Default collection implementation

If I am not mistaken default implementation for collection in Kodo is
LinkedList based
below is some statistics on collection performance (populating and iterating
collections)
the same test against 3 collections implementations (JDK 1.4.1)
Not only ArrayList by far the fastest and memory friendly it also garbage
collected much sooner and better -
I show here max memory consumption and last to would not be garbage
collected till all memory is in use (old generation GC)
and ArrayList seems to be collected by young gen GC because it was collected
very quickly between test cycles why other only when all memory was used
So please make ArrayList your default collection implementation :-)
Small collection size (40)
time(ms) memory(kb)
ArrayList 5,218 62,154
LinkedList 14,125 240,066
HashSet 27,000 311,825
the same but using using random inserts - append(index, object) rather than
append(object):
ArrayList 8937, 53591
LinkedList 15047, 240066
Larger collection size (200)
ArrayList 4860, 47709
LinkedList 18468, 290704
HashSet 34391, 422282
the same but using using random inserts - append(index, object) rather than
append(object):
ArrayList 11844, 47709
LinkedList 25766, 290704

Here is my quick and dirty perf test:
private static void perfTest() {
Integer v[] = new Integer[200];
for (int i = 0; i < v.length; i++) {
v[i] = new Integer(i);
Collection c[] = new Collection[10000];
long time = System.currentTimeMillis();
maxMem = 0;
for (int k = 0; k < 6; k++) {
for (int i = 0; i < c.length; i++) {
if (i % 2000 == 0) {
System.out.println(System.currentTimeMillis() - time + ", " +
maxMem());
//List l = new ArrayList();
//List l = new LinkedList();
//c[i] = l;
c[i] = new HashSet();
Collection co = c;
for (int j = 0; j < v.length; j++) {
co.add(v[j]);
//l.add(j/2, v[j]);
for (int i = 0; i < c.length; i++) {
if (i % 2000 == 0) {
System.out.println(System.currentTimeMillis() - time + ", " +
maxMem());
for (Iterator iterator = c[i].iterator(); iterator.hasNext();) {
iterator.next();
private static long maxMem = 0;
private static long maxMem() {
long mem = (Runtime.getRuntime().totalMemory() -
Runtime.getRuntime().freeMemory()) / 1000;
return mem;
// maxMem = Math.max(mem, maxMem);
// return maxMem;
"Abe White" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]..
Interesting. We'll certainly consider switching the default.

Similar Messages

  • Default Collection Option Set

    I currently use multiple collectors that I have created to scan different locations based upon IP Ranges. I have created them so that the collection is spread out over a one week period to minimize network activity.
    I have been directed to change my collection so that it happens every Sunday. All machines in the company are now "woken up" every Sunday to receive any necessary patches. I will be changing my collection schedule so that my inventories take place on Sunday also but I have a question about the Default Collection Option Set.
    Would it be better to make use of the Default Collection Option Set or should I create a separate Collection Set for this task? Also since I have only targeted specific IP Ranges in the past what should my settings be to ensure that I am looking at the entire network?
    I also do not remember - when they wake up the systems on the network will the machines inventory from the Login Page or do they actually need to be logged onto the network to complete the inventory.

    Originally Posted by DaryRo
    Would it be better to make use of the Default Collection Option Set or should I create a separate Collection Set for this task?
    I always create my own option sets and give them meaningful titles to make it a little easier to track what is going on. There is really no need (or advantage) to using the Default Option Set.
    Originally Posted by DaryRo
    Also since I have only targeted specific IP Ranges in the past what should my settings be to ensure that I am looking at the entire network?
    If you really want that one option set to collect from all clients then just the default settings in a new option set will work as long as you select a valid schedule on the first tab when creating the option set.
    Make sure that any new option set you create that you wish to use is actually associated to collection servers. Look at the properties of the collection servers and if they are set to inherit standard option sets then add the new option set in the Collection Server, Domain properties, if they are not set to inherit then add the new option set to each collection server.

  • How do I stop/remove screen saver photos in default collections?

    I installed Mavericks with no problems, however, I want to get rid of the screen savers/default collections. The desktop/wallpaper seems to be working fine: it rotates through my own "desktop pictures" collection.  However, I have been unable to eleminate the default collections photos from the screen savers. In System Preferences the source for screen savers is my "desktop pictures" folder, and my photos do come up, however, all the default collections photos are mixed in. If I uncheck Shuffle Slide Order, the default collections photos come on first.
    Now, here's the mystery: I deleted (with a Secure Empty Trash) the default collections photos! The folder is empty. I've also put all the
    com.apple.screensaver..... plist files in the trash. But they aren't deleted. Where are these photos coming from?  Why do they still show up? What do I have to do to get rid of them? I've searched the hard drive (as best I can) using a couple of the file names, but nothing comes up. Would I get a better search by using Terminal?

    Screen Saver changes on it’s own

  • Org.omg.CORBA.INITIALIZE: can't instantiate default ORB implementation

    Hello,
    I'm getting a following error message in .trc file (in udump):
    org.omg.CORBA.INITIALIZE: can't instantiate default ORB implementation
    This error is caused by very simple construction in my stored
    java procedure
    org.omg.CORBA.ORB orb = org.omg.CORBA.ORB.init();
    While loading my java procedure into Oracle 8.1.6.1 for NT,
    there are no error messages nor warning during resolving.
    I found, it's only problem of 8.1.6 version for NT,
    I can run my stored java programs on 8.1.5 for Linux.
    Doe's anybody have any idea what wrong with internal ORB
    in 8.1.6 Oracle RDBMS ?
    Thank you very much.
    null

    Laurent,
    When are you getting this error ? Is this error coming from Oc4J or are you getting this error from JDeveloper 9i ?
    regards
    Debu Panda
    Oracle

  • Can't instantiate default ORB implementation ....

    I'm developing a J2EE application, and I have this ERROR :
    java.lang.ExceptionInInitializerError: org.omg.CORBA.INITIALIZE: can't instantiate default ORB implementation com.visigenic.vbroker.orb.ORB minor code: 0 completed: No
         at java.lang.Throwable.fillInStackTrace(Native Method)
         at java.lang.Throwable.fillInStackTrace(Compiled Code)
         at java.lang.Throwable.(Compiled Code)
         at java.lang.Exception.(Compiled Code)
         at java.lang.RuntimeException.(RuntimeException.java:47)
         at org.omg.CORBA.SystemException.(SystemException.java:49)
         at org.omg.CORBA.INITIALIZE.(INITIALIZE.java:73)
         at org.omg.CORBA.INITIALIZE.(INITIALIZE.java:47)
         at org.omg.CORBA.ORB.create_impl(ORB.java:305)
         at
         at com.bo.wibean.WIServerImpl.init(WIServerImpl.java:214)
         at com.bo.wibean.WIServerImpl.(WIServerImpl.java:142)
         at retry.jspService(_retry.java:51)
    I'm using the OC4J r2. Some boby can help me ?

    Laurent,
    When are you getting this error ? Is this error coming from Oc4J or are you getting this error from JDeveloper 9i ?
    regards
    Debu Panda
    Oracle

  • Default collection Database Tables Changed!!!

    Hello,
    First of all I would like to thank Microsoft for an amazing product Team Foundation Server 2013. We recently migrated from TFS 2012 to TFS 2013 and My Team loved it !!! Especially the team collaboration features and "Features".
    My query is regarding Team Foundation Server Default Collection Database. I have a report in SSRS for Test Cases Statistics wherein we use tables viz. - "tbl_Plan" and "tbl_Suite". The mapping between these two tables has been done on
    basis of RootSuiteId of tbl_Plan and ParentSuiteId of tbl_Suite and PlanId of both tables.
    Till Team foundation server 2012 the table tbl_Plan had a column - "Name".
    In Team foundation server 2013, when I compile the procedure written for the Report, I get a compilation error for this column, since this no more exists in tbl_Plan. The column Name exists in tbl_PlanData now. I can't infer how to map the tables tbl_Plan
    and tbl_PlanData to keep my report working.
    Please help!!!
    Thanks in advance.
    Best Regards
    Yogesh kumar Hindoliya

    You should be using the TFS data warehouse (default db name: Tfs_Warehouse), preferably through the associated SSRS server.
    "You will find a fortune, though it will not be the one you seek." -
    Blind Seer, O Brother Where Art Thou
    Please Mark posts as answers or helpful so that others may find the fortune they seek.

  • Work Manager 6.1 Initialize / Default Collection

    Hi,
    I'm trying to default the Crew Member Collection from a complex table when the application initializes. I have added a Sub-Action to the Transmit Action which has an Enable Rule to determine if it executes.
    My issue is when I launch the Agentry Application, the Transmit Action is triggered and I can see my Enable Rule returns - True but my Sub-Action doesn't execute. ATE log extract below -
    The ATE log says my Action - ZCrewMemberDefaultAction has no enable rule configured, but the it has been set to "Always Enable"
    However if I manually trigger the Transmit Action (after the application has initialized) my Sub-Action executes and the Crew Members are defaulted.
    Can someone please help identify why my SubAction isn't being executed OR suggest any other options where I can execute my "Default Crew Member Logic" when the application is launched?
    I'm targeting the WPF platform (v7.0.4.203) and the complete ATE log is attached.
    Thanks,
    Stephen

    Of the actions in the ATE trace, Transmit seemed to make the most sense to try and plug my action into; hadn't tried the PM Login Action. I couldn't see other actions that might be suitable when the application is initialized.
    As a last resort I was going to create a Fetch BAPI to populate the collection, but thought it was redundant because I already have the required data in the Complex Table.
    OR
    Create a "Default Crew" button on the Crew Management View (Just got that working)
    Cheers.

  • What is the Java default ORB implementation class?

    I have a web application deployed on the Sun Java System Application Server 8. This application will also act as a CORBA client by invoking remote methods on another CORBA server.
    Our first approach was to use the ORB provided by the Sun App Server. But whenever the code reaches the point to initialize the ORB:
    orb = ORB.init(as, null); we encountered such exceptions:
    [#|2005-02-03T00:38:43.912-0600|WARNING|sun-appserver-pe8.0.0_01|javax.enterpris
    e.resource.corba._DEFAULT_.rpc.transport|_ThreadID=14;|"IOP00710209: (INTERNAL)
    Unable to create listener thread on the specific port"                         
    org.omg.CORBA.INTERNAL:   vmcid: SUN  minor code: 209  completed: No  
    at com.sun.corba.ee.impl.logging.ORBUtilSystemException.createListenerFa
    iled(ORBUtilSystemException.java:3142)                                         
            at com.sun.corba.ee.impl.logging.ORBUtilSystemException.createListenerFa
    iled(ORBUtilSystemException.java:3160)     When we deployed the same app on Tomcat, it worked fine. We later reasoned the exception was happening on the Sun App Server because perhaps it was trying to initialize another ORB with the same properties as the one initialized by the Sun App Server, and thus was trying to create another listener on a port already in use.
    On tomcat, the ORB used was the default ORB provided by Java. Thus, we thought we would try 'overriding' the ORB properties for the Sun App Server by specifiying this in the ORB.init() method:
            String as[] = null;
         Properties orbProperties = new Properties();
         orbProperties.put("org.omg.CORBA.ORBClass","com.sun.corba.se.internal.iiop.ORB");
         orbProperties.put("org.omg.CORBA.ORBSingletonClass","com.sun.corba.se.internal.iiop.ORB");
            orb = ORB.init(as, orbProperties);But when executing this, we get the exception as follows:
    Caused by: org.omg.CORBA.INITIALIZE: can't instantiate custom socket factory: co
    m.sun.enterprise.iiop.IIOPSSLSocketFactory  vmcid: 0x0  minor code: 0  completed
    : No                                                                           
            at com.sun.corba.se.internal.corba.ORB.parseProperties(ORB.java:1250)  
            at com.sun.corba.se.internal.POA.POAORB.parseProperties(POAORB.java:267)
            at com.sun.corba.se.internal.Interceptors.PIORB.parseProperties(PIORB.ja
    va:341)                                                                        
            at com.sun.corba.se.internal.corba.ORB.set_parameters(ORB.java:460)    
            at com.sun.corba.se.internal.POA.POAORB.set_parameters(POAORB.java:153)
            at com.sun.corba.se.internal.Interceptors.PIORB.set_parameters(PIORB.jav
    a:333)                                                                         
            at org.omg.CORBA.ORB.init(ORB.java:337)                                
            at com.covansys.ipceuc.corbalogic.SessionManager.<clinit>(SessionManager
    .java:159)      Some Sun sites mentioned that com.sun.CORBA.iiop.ORB is the Java ORB implementation. When trying to use this, we got a ClassNotFoundException.
    Also tried the following classes:
    com.sun.corba.se.internal.corba.ORB
    com.sun.corba.se.internal.core.ORB
    com.sun.corba.se.internal.org.omg.ORBAll of them reported exceptions as follows:
    Caused by: org.omg.CORBA.INITIALIZE: can't instantiate default ORB implementati
    n org.omg.CORBA.ORB  vmcid: 0x0  minor code: 0  completed: No                 
            at org.omg.CORBA.ORB.create_impl(ORB.java:297)                        
            at org.omg.CORBA.ORB.init(ORB.java:336)                               
            at com.covansys.ipceuc.corbalogic.SessionManager.<clinit>(SessionManage
    .java:158)                                                                    
            ... 55 more                                                           
    Caused by: java.lang.InstantiationException                                   
            at sun.reflect.InstantiationExceptionConstructorAccessorImpl.newInstanc
    (InstantiationExceptionConstructorAccessorImpl.java:30)                       
            at java.lang.reflect.Constructor.newInstance(Constructor.java:274)    
            at java.lang.Class.newInstance0(Class.java:308)                       
            at java.lang.Class.newInstance(Class.java:261)                        
            at org.omg.CORBA.ORB.create_impl(ORB.java:295)                        
            ... 57 more                                                           
    |#]                                                                            Anyone know what the Java ORB implementation class is, or whether this is possible at all?
    Thanks in advance.

    Hello
    The defaults for JDK 1.4.2 (at least) are shown it the code below:
            Properties p = new Properties ();
            p.put ("org.omg.CORBA.ORBSingletonClass",
                   "com.sun.corba.se.internal.corba.ORBSingleton");
            p.put ("org.omg.CORBA.ORBClass",
                   "com.sun.corba.se.internal.Interceptors.PIORB");
            p.put ("javax.rmi.CORBA.UtilClass",
                   "com.sun.corba.se.internal.POA.ShutdownUtilDelegate");
            p.put ("javax.rmi.CORBA.PortableRemoteObjectClass",
                   "com.sun.corba.se.internal.javax.rmi.PortableRemoteObject");
            System.setProperties (p);Of course you can use this code to set these defaults back. Be careful, if you do this inside Weblogic, for instance, it will likely abend.
    []'s
    Marcond

  • Default Collection Set For New Collect

    Good Morning,
    Since upgrading to 5.2 I notice that when I right click on a collection set to create a new collection Lightroom does not default to the collection set I right clicked on as the "Inside Collection Set" if my original collection set is nested inside another collection set. I am then force to scroll through a long list of collection sets to choose the correct one.
    It did not work like this in previous versions - 5.0 or 3.6.
    Is this an intentional change or some type of bug?
    Thanks
    Harry

    I have the same issue. In previous version of LR you could control click on a collection set, select "create collection" and the window would open with the same collection set selected. Now it jumps to the parent collection set of the one you clicked on forcing you to go back and scroll through to find the original collection set. It's a small issue but a pain all the same.

  • Catch-all or default collection?

    I currently organize photos by folder, I would like to start organizing by collection/smart collection instead.  (Folders will be organized chronologically only).  I would like to know if there is a catch-all collection, that is, if the photo is not in any other collection, it ends up in this default one.  I think this is necessary so that I don't loss track of any photo. 

    yiplong wrote:
    Thanks for your reply, but I am not sure what you were talking about.  Can you elaborate?
    Set up a smart collection with the following content:
    This smart collection will then automatically contain all the images which do not belong to a (non-smart) collection.
    Beat

  • Collection Mgmt - All Invoices in going in default collection group

    Hi,
    We have three groups say CG01, CG02, CG03 in segment CG and CG01 is default. What is happening now is All invoice of customer CUST01 for CG is getting assigned to default group.
    How can we have this changed like all invoices for customer CUST01 with company code CC01 should go to group CG01,  invoices of company code CC02 should go to CG02 and so on.
    Can this be done in config or needs to done in Badi. If Badi then what would be approriate Badi?
    Thanks.

    Hi,
    I concur Torsten, I recommend you check the security role of All Systems collection.
    For more information, please review the link below.
    Configuring Security for Configuration Manager
    http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/hh427332.aspx#BKMK_ConfigSecRole
    Also, you could create a custom collection using the same query with All Systems Collection. 
    We
    are trying to better understand customer views on social support experience, so your participation in this interview project would be greatly appreciated if you have time.
    Thanks for helping make community forums a great place.

  • Help me, please, to get right collection implementation

    I'm in anxiety about what kind of collection I need to choose:
    I need to store String names and map them to indecies.
    Than I need to get index of name by provide name to collection's method.
    I think that HashMap will be big, because List may store objects and have indecies, but I can find an appropriate method to get name index if I want. (except iterate via list elements using iterator).
    What do you think will be the best?

    I'm in anxiety about what kind of collection I need
    to choose:
    I need to store String names and map them to
    indecies.
    Than I need to get index of name by provide name to
    collection's method.
    I think that HashMap will be big, because List may
    store objects and have indecies, but I can find an
    appropriate method to get name index if I want.
    (except iterate via list elements using iterator).
    What do you think will be the best?I vote for java.util.List:
    List<String> values = new ArrayList<String>();
    String thisValue = "some String that's indexed";
    values.add(thisValue);
    int thisIndex = values.indexOf(thisValue);Read the javadocs.
    %

  • One object needs to map to several objects. Best collection implementation?

    Hello,
    What is the best kind of Collection to use for the following scenario?
    I 2 folders (stored in a folders_collection) and 10 files (stored in a files_collection). I iterate through and access a folder in the folders_collection one at a time. I then inspect the files_collection for files that belong to that folder. After I have all of the files that belong to that folder, I then add the files to an internal folder_attribute_collection of the folder_object. WHAT IS THE BEST COLLECTION TO STORE MY �FILES� OBJECTS IN?
    I was hoping to use an instance the MAP collection (Map files_collection = new TreeMap <�String_key�, file_object_value>();),�where the String key is the ID of the folder_object that the file belongs to. But maps don�t allow duplicate keys.
    Thanks
    RodneyM

    lol...I'll try.
    Objective:
    - I have a folder that has a folder ID called javaFolder_ID.
    - I have 5 files in a collection (javaFile_1,javaFile_2,javaFile_3,cobolFile1,cobolFile2).
    - Only 3 of the 5 files in the collection go with the folder above. The other two go to another folder.
    - I am currently: Looping through the files collection and inspect the ID of each file. If the file has the javaFolderID in it, then I add that file to the FILES collection attribute of the above folder.
    Instead of looping through the files collection, it would be great to be able to say:
    - for this folder ID: javaFolder_ID
    - access the files collection and return ALL files that have the "key" javaFolder_ID.
    - Now I have a collection of files that goes with the folder and I add them to the files collection attribute of the folder.
    Ex: using a tree map you can access elements of the collection by calling its key value. The problem here is that a map collection can not hold duplicate keys. So I can not provide one folder ID to the map collection, and have it return ALL the elements in the map collection with that ID.
    So I'm wondering if there is even a way to do something like this. If not I'll just resort to iterating through the collection. But when you have tons of objects it will take a bit longer.
    Thanks for giving this a shot.

  • Configuring Kodo default implementation for field of Collection type

    If I am not mistaken default implementation for field of Collection type in
    Kodo is
    LinkedList based proxy. It would be great if it were possible to configure
    Kodo to use a proxy of my choosing
    I did some tests and it seems to me that ArrayList is much more efficient
    than Linked list (see below)
    Is there any specific reason I am not aware of that makes LinkedList better
    than array list
    In my applications all collections a relatively small (or at least most of
    my collections are definitely small)
    and since I use Collection interface there is no inserts into middle of my
    collections - only appends (which ArrayList handles very well)
    So my question is can I make Kodo to use ArrayListProxy for fields of
    Collection type
    (except of course using ArrayList field instead of Collection which I do not
    want to do)
    below is some statistics on collection performance (populating and iterating
    collections)
    the same test against 3 collections implementations (JDK 1.4.1)
    Not only ArrayList by far the fastest and memory friendly it also garbage
    collected much sooner and better -
    I show here max memory consumption and last to would not be garbage
    collected till all memory is in use (old generation GC)
    and ArrayList seems to be collected by young gen GC because it was collected
    very quickly between test cycles why other only when all memory was used
    So please make ArrayList your default collection implementation :-)
    Small collection size (40)
    time(ms) memory(kb)
    ArrayList 5,218 62,154
    LinkedList 14,125 240,066
    HashSet 27,000 311,825
    the same but using using random inserts - append(index, object) rather than
    append(object):
    ArrayList 8937, 53591
    LinkedList 15047, 240066
    Larger collection size (200)
    ArrayList 4860, 47709
    LinkedList 18468, 290704
    HashSet 34391, 422282
    the same but using using random inserts - append(index, object) rather than
    append(object):
    ArrayList 11844, 47709
    LinkedList 25766, 290704

    You should be able to accomplish this fairly easily by extending
    SimpleProxyManager:
    http://solarmetric.com/Software/Documentation/2.4.3/docs/javadoc/com/solarmetric/kodo/util/SimpleProxyManager.html
    and overriding the appropriate methods (getCollectionCopy and
    getCollectionProxy).
    On Mon, 12 May 2003 12:26:21 -0400, Alex Roytman wrote:
    If I am not mistaken default implementation for field of Collection type in
    Kodo is
    LinkedList based proxy. It would be great if it were possible to configure
    Kodo to use a proxy of my choosing
    I did some tests and it seems to me that ArrayList is much more efficient
    than Linked list (see below)
    Is there any specific reason I am not aware of that makes LinkedList better
    than array list
    In my applications all collections a relatively small (or at least most of
    my collections are definitely small)
    and since I use Collection interface there is no inserts into middle of my
    collections - only appends (which ArrayList handles very well)
    So my question is can I make Kodo to use ArrayListProxy for fields of
    Collection type
    (except of course using ArrayList field instead of Collection which I do not
    want to do)
    below is some statistics on collection performance (populating and iterating
    collections)
    the same test against 3 collections implementations (JDK 1.4.1)
    Not only ArrayList by far the fastest and memory friendly it also garbage
    collected much sooner and better -
    I show here max memory consumption and last to would not be garbage
    collected till all memory is in use (old generation GC)
    and ArrayList seems to be collected by young gen GC because it was collected
    very quickly between test cycles why other only when all memory was used
    So please make ArrayList your default collection implementation :-)
    Small collection size (40)
    time(ms) memory(kb)
    ArrayList 5,218 62,154
    LinkedList 14,125 240,066
    HashSet 27,000 311,825
    the same but using using random inserts - append(index, object) rather than
    append(object):
    ArrayList 8937, 53591
    LinkedList 15047, 240066
    Larger collection size (200)
    ArrayList 4860, 47709
    LinkedList 18468, 290704
    HashSet 34391, 422282
    the same but using using random inserts - append(index, object) rather than
    append(object):
    ArrayList 11844, 47709
    LinkedList 25766, 290704

  • Overriding default implementation of TrustManager class

    The IBM JSSE provider's default TrustManager implementation doesn't allow anonymous cipher suites.
    http://www-128.ibm.com/developerworks/library/j-ibmsecurity.html?ca=drs-j4304
    I want to override it, so that anonymous cipher suites can be allowed.
    Does anyone know how to do this.
    Thanks,
    JVR

    A custom renderer needs to extend the abstract class
    javax.faces.Renderer and supply five methods. Four of
    them (encodeXXX and decode) make perfect sense, but
    the fifth one (getClientId) isn't in the same league.
    Wouldn't most renderers want to use the standard
    mechanism?
    Thanks for the feedback.
    This issue is already on the Expert Group's radar as an issue to be addressed. I would not be at all surprised if we end up with a standard base class for Renderers that includes a default implementation for things like getClientId().
    Craig

Maybe you are looking for

  • Iweb page modified with a simple html editor , now not display navigation menu

    Hello i've designed a site http://www.ballettgastini.ch with Iweb and was working till i've the needs to update a simple text in one page and get it via ftp from the server, modified with a simple html editor !!!!, and update via ftp on the server. n

  • JFormattedTextField as custom cell renderer in JTable?

    I have my custom renderers in my custom JTable that work quite good so far. After upgrading to JDK 1.4, i want to finally use formatted text fields in my JTable. So, i extended my renderes to also support formatters. But this doesn't seem to work. Th

  • BDC for ME21N (Flat file format)

    Hello,      I have to write a BDC for ME21N(stock transfer).... Someone pls give me the format of flat file... we need separate files for header and items or only one file is enough??? pls someone send me the format and code...... my email id is [ema

  • Open in CS4 Fit to Screen, from Bridge

    Is there a way I can open a RAW file in  ACR, and when I Open Image in CS4, they always open as fit to screen? The default seems to be 33.33%? Windows XP and CS4. Bob

  • MSS - Authorization

    Hi, Different Managers having different responsibilities need to have specific authorization to perform their specific functions... for instance a manager who is entitled to approve PO or approve training request or carry out appraisals etc..... Can