Diff b/w select endselect and select into table............
what is the difference b/w
Select
Endselect
and select into table....
Akshitha..
Hi,
When ever u want to append data into the workarea then use select ... endselect. When u r appending data into the internal table then use select. Also when u use select single then also use only select.
Eg: Using only Select
data : begin of itab occurs 0,
lifnr like lfa1-lifnr,
end of itab.
select single lifnr from lfa1 into itab.
data itab like lfa1 occurs 0 with header line.
select * from lfa1 into table itab.
Eg: Using Select .. endselect.
data : itab like lfa1 occurs 0,
wa like lfa1.
select * from lfa1 into wa.
append wa to itab.
endselect.
Regards
Similar Messages
-
Diff between select single and select upto 1 rows.
Hello aLL,
PL tell what is technical diff between select single and select upto 1 rows and how it is affecting the performance.
RushikeshHi
Knowing when to use SELECT SINGLE or SELECT ... UP TO 1 ROWS
A lot of people use the SELECT SINGLE statement to check for the existence of a value in a database. Other people prefer to use the 'UP TO 1 ROWS' variant of the SELECT statement.
So what's the difference between using 'SELECT SINGLE' statement as against a 'SELECT .... UP TO 1 ROWS' statement ?
If you're considering the statements
SELECT SINGLE field INTO w_field FROM table.
and
SELECT field INTO w_field FROM table UP TO 1 ROWS. ENDSELECT.
then looking at the result, not much apart from the extra ENDSELECT statement. Look at the run time and memory usage and they may be worlds apart.
Why is this ?? The answer is simple.
The 'SELECT SINGLE' statement selects the first row in the database that it finds that fulfils the 'WHERE' clause If this results in multiple records then only the first one will be returned and therefore may not be unique.
The 'SELECT .... UP TO 1 ROWS' statement is subtly different. The database selects all of the relevant records that are defined by the WHERE clause, applies any aggregate, ordering or grouping functions to them and then returns the first record of the result set.
Get the difference ??
If not, here is a good example, credit for this example goes to Richard Harper, a friend of mine on sapfans.com :
Create a Ztable called ZDifference with 2 fields in it, MANDT of type MANDT and POSNR of type POSNR. Make sure both of these are keys. Also create a table maintenance dialog for it (SE11->Utilities->Table Maintenance Generator). Fill the table with ten rows 000001-000010.
Then run the program shown below:
Code:
Program: Z_Difference
Purpose: A program that demonstrates the difference
between SELECT SINGLE and SELECT UP TO n ROWS.
This program requires the data table Z_DIFFERENCE
to have been created according to the structure
outlined in the text above and populated with
at least 10 records.
Creation Date: 21/04/2004
Requested By:
Reference Doc:
Author: R Harper
Modification History:
Date Reason Transport Who
Report Z_Difference
Message-id 38
Line-Size 80
Line-Count 0
No Standard Page Heading.
Start-Of-Selection.
Data: w_Single type Posnr,
t_Rows type standard table of Posnr
initial size 0
with header line.
Select single Posnr
from zDifference
into w_Single.
Select Posnr
into table t_Rows
from zDifference
up to 1 rows
order by Posnr descending.
Write :/ 'Select single:', w_Single.
Skip 1.
Write :/ 'Up to 1 rows :'.
Loop at t_Rows.
Write t_Rows.
EndLoop.
You should see the output:
Select single: 000001
Up to 1 rows : 000010
The first 'SELECT' statement selected the first record in the database according to any selection criterion in the 'WHERE' clause. This is what a 'SELECT SINGLE' does. The second 'SELECT' has asked the database to reverse the order of the records before returning the first row of the result.
In order to be able to do this the database has read the entire table, sort it and then return the first record. If there was no ORDER BY clause then the results would have been identical (ie both '000001') but the second select if given a big enough table to look at would be far slower.
Note that this causes a problem in the Extended Program Check if the full key is not specified in a 'SELECT SINGLE'. Replacing the 'SELECT SINGLE' by an "UP TO 1 ROWS" will give the same exact results without any warning but the program will run slower and consume more memory. This is a good example of a warning that we should ignore... considering you are sure of what you are doing !! -
Diff bw select single * and select upto one row
hai,
what is the difference between select single * and select upto one row.hi,
ex code
Report Z_Difference
Message-id 38
Line-Size 80
Line-Count 0
No Standard Page Heading.
Start-Of-Selection.
Data: w_Single type Posnr,
t_Rows type standard table of Posnr
initial size 0
with header line.
Select single Posnr
from zDifference
into w_Single.
Select Posnr
into table t_Rows
from zDifference
up to 1 rows
order by Posnr descending.
Write :/ 'Select single:', w_Single.
Skip 1.
Write :/ 'Up to 1 rows :'.
Loop at t_Rows.
Write t_Rows.
EndLoop.
According to SAP Performance course the SELECT UP TO 1 ROWS is faster than SELECT SINGLE because you are not
using all the primary key fields.
select single is a construct designed to read database records with primary key. In the absence of the primary key,
it might end up doing a sequential search, whereas the select up to 1 rows may assume that there is no primary key
supplied and will try to find most suitable index.
The best way to find out is through sql trace or runtime analysis.
Use "select up to 1 rows" only if you are sure that all the records returned will have the same value for the field(s)
you are interested in. If not, you will be reading only the first record which matches the criteria, but may be the
second or the third record has the value you are looking for.
The System test result showed that the variant Single * takes less time than Up to 1 rows as there is an additional
level for COUNT STOP KEY for SELECT ENDSELECT UP TO 1 ROWS.
The 'SELECT SINGLE' statement selects the first row in the database that it finds that fulfils the 'WHERE' clause
If this results in multiple records then only the first one will be returned and therefore may not be unique.
Mainly: to read data from
The 'SELECT .... UP TO 1 ROWS' statement is subtly different. The database selects all of the relevant records that
are defined by the WHERE clause, applies any aggregate, ordering or grouping functions to them and then returns
the first record of the result set.
Mainly: to check if entries exist.
You can refer to the below link..
http://www.sap-img.com/abap/difference-between-select-single-and-select-upto-one-rows.htm
rgds
anver
if hlped pls mark points -
Select Single * and Select upto one row
Hi all,
Can anybody tell me what is difference between Select single * and select upto one row?
And which one is better?
Thanks in advance.......According to SAP Performance course the SELECT UP TO 1 ROWS is faster than SELECT SINGLE because you are not using all the primary key fields.
select single is a construct designed to read database records with primary key. In the absence of the primary key, it might end up doing a sequential search, whereas the select up to 1 rows may assume that there is no primary key supplied and will try to find most suitable index.
The best way to find out is through sql trace or runtime analysis.
Use "select up to 1 rows" only if you are sure that all the records returned will have the same value for the field(s) you are interested in. If not, you will be reading only the first record which matches the criteria, but may be the second or the third record has the value you are looking for.
The System test result showed that the variant Single * takes less time than Up to 1 rows as there is an additional level for COUNT STOP KEY for SELECT ENDSELECT UP TO 1 ROWS.
The 'SELECT SINGLE' statement selects the first row in the database that it finds that fulfils the 'WHERE' clause If this results in multiple records then only the first one will be returned and therefore may not be unique.
Mainly: to read data from
The 'SELECT .... UP TO 1 ROWS' statement is subtly different. The database selects all of the relevant records that are defined by the WHERE clause, applies any aggregate, ordering or grouping functions to them and then returns the first record of the result set.
Mainly: to check if entries exist.
Select Single is the best one compared to UPto one rows.
Select Single will get the first record from the table which satisfies the given condition.So it will interact once with the database.
UTO 1 rows will get the list of the records for the given match and iwll show the first record from the list.So it will take time to get the record.
SELECT SINGLE VBELN from VBAK
where MATNR = '1M20'.
---Thjis will get the first matched record and will display the record
SELECT VBELN from VBAK
where MATNR = '1M20' upto 1 rows.
---Thjis will get the list of matched records and will display the first record
The Major difference between Select Single and Select UPTO 1 rows is The Usage Of Buffer for each.
Select Single will search for all the satisfied data and bring all that data into Buffer and later it will give to that data to the program.
Select UPTO 1 Rows will end the search after getting the 1st satisfied record and gives that record to the program.
Thus Select Single will take much processing time when compare with Select UPTO 1 rows.
Also
check these threads..
Difference between Select Single and Selct upto 1 row
Difference between Select Single and Select upto 1 row
Difference between select single and select upto one row
Difference between 'select single *' and 'select upto 1 rows'
difference between select single and select up to 1 rows
regards,
srinivas
<b>*reward for useful answers*</b> -
Regarding select single and select upto 1 rows
hi experts,
plz let me know about difference between select single and select upto 1 rows with small eg...
thnx in advance.Hi Ravi,
According to SAP Performance course the SELECT UP TO 1 ROWS is faster than SELECT SINGLE because you are not using all the primary key fields.
select single is a construct designed to read database records with primary key. In the absence of the primary key, it might end up doing a sequential search, whereas the select up to 1 rows may assume that there is no primary key supplied and will try to find most suitable index.
The best way to find out is through sql trace or runtime analysis.
Use "select up to 1 rows" only if you are sure that all the records returned will have the same value for the field(s) you are interested in. If not, you will be reading only the first record which matches the criteria, but may be the second or the third record has the value you are looking for.
The System test result showed that the variant Single * takes less time than Up to 1 rows as there is an additional level for COUNT STOP KEY for SELECT ENDSELECT UP TO 1 ROWS.
The 'SELECT SINGLE' statement selects the first row in the database that it finds that fulfils the 'WHERE' clause If this results in multiple records then only the first one will be returned and therefore may not be unique.
Mainly: to read data from
The 'SELECT .... UP TO 1 ROWS' statement is subtly different. The database selects all of the relevant records that are defined by the WHERE clause, applies any aggregate, ordering or grouping functions to them and then returns the first record of the result set.
Mainly: to check if entries exist.
Select Single is the best one compared to UPto one rows.
Select Single will get the first record from the table which satisfies the given condition.So it will interact once with the database.
UTO 1 rows will get the list of the records for the given match and iwll show the first record from the list.So it will take time to get the record.
SELECT SINGLE VBELN from VBAK
where MATNR = '1M20'.
---Thjis will get the first matched record and will display the record
SELECT VBELN from VBAK
where MATNR = '1M20' upto 1 rows.
---Thjis will get the list of matched records and will display the first record
The Major difference between Select Single and Select UPTO 1 rows is The Usage Of Buffer for each.
Select Single will search for all the satisfied data and bring all that data into Buffer and later it will give to that data to the program.
Select UPTO 1 Rows will end the search after getting the 1st satisfied record and gives that record to the program.
Thus Select Single will take much processing time when compare with Select UPTO 1 rows.
Also
check these threads..
Difference between Select Single and Selct upto 1 row
Difference between Select Single and Select upto 1 row
Thanks,
Reward If Helpful. -
Regarding select single and select upto???
HI All,
Cud u pls let me know the differences between select single and select upto??
and which is the better option?? pls its quite urgent..plss plss
plss
Thanx in Advance
PrasadHi..,
According to SAP Performance course the SELECT UP TO 1 ROWS is faster than SELECT SINGLE because you are not using all the primary key fields.
select single is a construct designed to read database records with primary key. In the absence of the primary key, it might end up doing a sequential search, whereas the select up to 1 rows may assume that there is no primary key supplied and will try to find most suitable index.
The best way to find out is through sql trace or runtime analysis.
Use "select up to 1 rows" only if you are sure that all the records returned will have the same value for the field(s) you are interested in. If not, you will be reading only the first record which matches the criteria, but may be the second or the third record has the value you are looking for.
The System test result showed that the variant Single * takes less time than Up to 1 rows as there is an additional level for COUNT STOP KEY for SELECT ENDSELECT UP TO 1 ROWS.
The 'SELECT SINGLE' statement selects the first row in the database that it finds that fulfils the 'WHERE' clause If this results in multiple records then only the first one will be returned and therefore may not be unique.
Mainly: to read data from
The 'SELECT .... UP TO 1 ROWS' statement is subtly different. The database selects all of the relevant records that are defined by the WHERE clause, applies any aggregate, ordering or grouping functions to them and then returns the first record of the result set.
Mainly: to check if entries exist.
Check this example ...
DATA: gv_vbeln TYPE vbak-vbeln,
gv_erdat TYPE vbak-erdat.
SELECT SINGLE vbeln erdat
FROM vbak
INTO (gv_vbeln, gv_erdat)
WHERE erdat = '12/01/2006'.
SELECT vbeln erdat
FROM vbak UP TO 1 ROWS
INTO (gv_vbeln, gv_erdat)
<b>ORDER BY erdat ASCENDING</b>.
ENDSELECT.
*In the example, the select single gets the first record that satisfies the WHERE clause unlike in the UP TO 1 ROWS where it sorts the database records by the earliest date and gets its VBELN.
<b>Try using the ORDER BY clause in SELECT SINGLE .. It gives an error !! U cannot use that with SELECT SINGLE</b>
The 'SELECT SINGLE' statement selects the first row in the database that it finds that fulfils the 'WHERE' clause If this results in multiple records then only the first one will be returned and therefore may not be unique.
Hope u understood !!
reward if it helps u..
sai ramesh -
"select count(*)" and "select single *" returns different result
Good day!
product version SAP ECC 6.0
oracle10
data transfers from external oracle db into customer tables using direct oracle db link
sometimes I get case with different results from 2 statements
*mytable has 10 rows
*1st statement
data: cnt type I value 0.
select count( * ) into cnt from mytable WHERE myfield_0 = 123 and myfield_1 = '123'.
*cnt returns 10 - correct
*2nd statement
select single * from mytable WHERE myfield_0 = 123 and myfield_1 = '123'.
*sy-dbcnt returns 0
*sy-subrc returns 4 - incorrect, 10 rows are "invisible"
but
1. se16 shows correct row number
2. I update just one row from "invisible" rows using se16 and 2nd statement returns correct result after that
can not understand why
thank you in advance.Thank you, Vishal
but,
general problem is that
1. both statements have the same WHERE conditions
2. 1st return resultset with data (sy-dbcnt=10), 2nd return empty dataset, but must return 1 in sy-dbcnt
Yes, different meaning, you are right, but must 2nd must return 1, because of "select single *" construction, not 0.
Dataset to process is the same, WHERE conditions are equal...
I think the problem is that how ABAP interperets select count(*) and "select single *".
Maybe "select count (*)" scans only PK from index page(s)? and "select single *" scans data pages? and something is wrong with that?
I'm new in SAP and didn't find any SAP tool to trace dump of data and indexes pages with Native SQL.
se16 shows all records.
And why after simple manual update of just one record using se16 "select single *" returns 1?
I've just marked one row to update, didn't change any data, then pressed "save". -
hi everybody
what is the exact difference between select single vbeln and select vbeln
In what situations i should use these select single vbeln or select vbeln
regards
hridhayanjili.Hai
Go through the following Document
According to SAP Performance course the SELECT UP TO 1 ROWS is faster than SELECT SINGLE because you are not
using all the primary key fields.
select single is a construct designed to read database records with primary key. In the absence of the primary key,
it might end up doing a sequential search, whereas the select up to 1 rows may assume that there is no primary key
supplied and will try to find most suitable index.
The best way to find out is through sql trace or runtime analysis.
Use "select up to 1 rows" only if you are sure that all the records returned will have the same value for the field(s)
you are interested in. If not, you will be reading only the first record which matches the criteria, but may be the
second or the third record has the value you are looking for.
The System test result showed that the variant Single * takes less time than Up to 1 rows as there is an additional
level for COUNT STOP KEY for SELECT ENDSELECT UP TO 1 ROWS.
The 'SELECT SINGLE' statement selects the first row in the database that it finds that fulfils the 'WHERE' clause
If this results in multiple records then only the first one will be returned and therefore may not be unique.
Mainly: to read data from
The 'SELECT .... UP TO 1 ROWS' statement is subtly different. The database selects all of the relevant records that
are defined by the WHERE clause, applies any aggregate, ordering or grouping functions to them and then returns
the first record of the result set.
Mainly: to check if entries exist.
You can refer to the below link..
http://www.sap-img.com/abap/difference-between-select-single-and-select-upto-one-rows.htm
Regards
Sreeni -
Select single and select upto 1 rows
Hi
What is the difference between select single and select upto 1 rows
Performance wise which one is the best
Regards,
MayaHi,
Difference Between Select Single and Select UpTo One Rows
According to SAP Performance course the SELECT UP TO 1 ROWS is faster than SELECT SINGLE because you are not using all the primary key fields.
select single is a construct designed to read database records with primary key. In the absence of the primary key, it might end up doing a sequential search, whereas the select up to 1 rows may assume that there is no primary key supplied and will try to find most suitable index.
The best way to find out is through sql trace or runtime analysis.
Use "select up to 1 rows" only if you are sure that all the records returned will have the same value for the field(s) you are interested in. If not, you will be reading only the first record which matches the criteria, but may be the second or the third record has the value you are looking for.
The System test result showed that the variant Single * takes less time than Up to 1 rows as there is an additional level for COUNT STOP KEY for SELECT ENDSELECT UP TO 1 ROWS.
The 'SELECT SINGLE' statement selects the first row in the database that it finds that fulfils the 'WHERE' clause If this results in multiple records then only the first one will be returned and therefore may not be unique.
Mainly: to read data from
The 'SELECT .... UP TO 1 ROWS' statement is subtly different. The database selects all of the relevant records that are defined by the WHERE clause, applies any aggregate, ordering or grouping functions to them and then returns the first record of the result set.
Mainly: to check if entries exist.
reward points if useful
regards,
ANJI -
what is the difference of select single and select upto statements
HI,
SELECT UP TO 1 ROWS is faster than SELECT SINGLE because you are not using all the primary key fields.
select single is a construct designed to read database records with primary key. In the absence of the primary key, it might end up doing a sequential search, whereas the select up to 1 rows may assume that there is no primary key supplied and will try to find most suitable index.
The best way to find out is through sql trace or runtime analysis.
Use "select up to 1 rows" only if you are sure that all the records returned will have the same value for the field(s) you are interested in. If not, you will be reading only the first record which matches the criteria, but may be the second or the third record has the value you are looking for.
The System test result showed that the variant Single * takes less time than Up to 1 rows as there is an additional level for COUNT STOP KEY for SELECT ENDSELECT UP TO 1 ROWS.
The 'SELECT SINGLE' statement selects the first row in the database that it finds that fulfils the 'WHERE' clause If this results in multiple records then only the first one will be returned and therefore may not be unique.
Mainly: to read data from
The 'SELECT .... UP TO 1 ROWS' statement is subtly different. The database selects all of the relevant records that are defined by the WHERE clause, applies any aggregate, ordering or grouping functions to them and then returns the first record of the result set.
Mainly: to check if entries exist. -
Defference between select single and select upto 1 row?
What is the Defference between select single and select upto 1 row?
Hi,
Difference Between Select Single and Select UpTo One Rows
According to SAP Performance course the SELECT UP TO 1 ROWS is faster than SELECT SINGLE because you are not using all the primary key fields.
select single is a construct designed to read database records with primary key. In the absence of the primary key, it might end up doing a sequential search, whereas the select up to 1 rows may assume that there is no primary key supplied and will try to find most suitable index.
The best way to find out is through sql trace or runtime analysis.
Use "select up to 1 rows" only if you are sure that all the records returned will have the same value for the field(s) you are interested in. If not, you will be reading only the first record which matches the criteria, but may be the second or the third record has the value you are looking for.
The System test result showed that the variant Single * takes less time than Up to 1 rows as there is an additional level for COUNT STOP KEY for SELECT ENDSELECT UP TO 1 ROWS.
The 'SELECT SINGLE' statement selects the first row in the database that it finds that fulfils the 'WHERE' clause If this results in multiple records then only the first one will be returned and therefore may not be unique.
Mainly: to read data from
The 'SELECT .... UP TO 1 ROWS' statement is subtly different. The database selects all of the relevant records that are defined by the WHERE clause, applies any aggregate, ordering or grouping functions to them and then returns the first record of the result set.
Regards,
Priya. -
Reg: read excel column and insert into table.
hi Friends,
i wanted to read the data from Excel and insert into in my oracle tables.
can you provide the link or example script.
how to read the column value from excel and insert into table.
please help.< unnecessary reference to personal blog removed by moderator >
Here are the steps:
1) First create a directory and grant read , write , execute to the user from where you want to access the flat files and load it.
2) Write a generic function to load PIPE delimited flat files:
CREATE OR REPLACE FUNCTION TABLE_LOAD ( p_table in varchar2,
p_dir in varchar2 DEFAULT ‘YOUR_DIRECTORY_NAME’,
P_FILENAME in varchar2,
p_ignore_headerlines IN INTEGER DEFAULT 1,
p_delimiter in varchar2 default ‘|’,
p_optional_enclosed in varchar2 default ‘”‘ )
return number
is
– FUNCTION TABLE_LOAD
– PURPOSE: Load the flat files i.e. only text files to Oracle
– tables.
– This is a generic function which can be used for
– importing any text flat files to oracle database.
– PARAMETERS:
– P_TABLE
– Pass name of the table for which import has to be done.
– P_DIR
– Name of the directory where the file is been placed.
– Note: The grant has to be given for the user to the directory
– before executing the function
– P_FILENAME
– The name of the flat file(a text file)
– P_IGNORE_HEADERLINES
– By default we are passing 1 to skip the first line of the file
– which are headers on the Flat files.
– P_DELIMITER
– Dafault “|” pipe is been passed.
– P_OPTIONAL_ENCLOSED
– Optionally enclosed by ‘ ” ‘ are been ignored.
– AUTHOR:
– Slobaray
l_input utl_file.file_type;
l_theCursor integer default dbms_sql.open_cursor;
l_lastLine varchar2(4000);
l_cnames varchar2(4000);
l_bindvars varchar2(4000);
l_status integer;
l_cnt number default 0;
l_rowCount number default 0;
l_sep char(1) default NULL;
L_ERRMSG varchar2(4000);
V_EOF BOOLEAN := false;
begin
l_cnt := 1;
for TAB_COLUMNS in (
select column_name, data_type from user_tab_columns where table_name=p_table order by column_id
) loop
l_cnames := l_cnames || tab_columns.column_name || ‘,’;
l_bindvars := l_bindvars || case when tab_columns.data_type in (‘DATE’, ‘TIMESTAMP(6)’) then ‘to_date(:b’ || l_cnt || ‘,”YYYY-MM-DD HH24:MI:SS”),’ else ‘:b’|| l_cnt || ‘,’ end;
l_cnt := l_cnt + 1;
end loop;
l_cnames := rtrim(l_cnames,’,');
L_BINDVARS := RTRIM(L_BINDVARS,’,');
L_INPUT := UTL_FILE.FOPEN( P_DIR, P_FILENAME, ‘r’ );
IF p_ignore_headerlines > 0
THEN
BEGIN
FOR i IN 1 .. p_ignore_headerlines
LOOP
UTL_FILE.get_line(l_input, l_lastLine);
END LOOP;
EXCEPTION
WHEN NO_DATA_FOUND
THEN
v_eof := TRUE;
end;
END IF;
if not v_eof then
dbms_sql.parse( l_theCursor, ‘insert into ‘ || p_table || ‘(‘ || l_cnames || ‘) values (‘ || l_bindvars || ‘)’, dbms_sql.native );
loop
begin
utl_file.get_line( l_input, l_lastLine );
exception
when NO_DATA_FOUND then
exit;
end;
if length(l_lastLine) > 0 then
for i in 1 .. l_cnt-1
LOOP
dbms_sql.bind_variable( l_theCursor, ‘:b’||i,
ltrim(rtrim(rtrim(
regexp_substr(l_lastLine,’([^|]*)(\||$)’,1,i),p_delimiter),p_optional_enclosed),p_optional_enclosed));
end loop;
begin
l_status := dbms_sql.execute(l_theCursor);
l_rowCount := l_rowCount + 1;
exception
when OTHERS then
L_ERRMSG := SQLERRM;
insert into BADLOG ( TABLE_NAME, ERRM, data, ERROR_DATE )
values ( P_TABLE,l_errmsg, l_lastLine ,systimestamp );
end;
end if;
end loop;
dbms_sql.close_cursor(l_theCursor);
utl_file.fclose( l_input );
commit;
end if;
insert into IMPORT_HIST (FILENAME,TABLE_NAME,NUM_OF_REC,IMPORT_DATE)
values ( P_FILENAME, P_TABLE,l_rowCount,sysdate );
UTL_FILE.FRENAME(
P_DIR,
P_FILENAME,
P_DIR,
REPLACE(P_FILENAME,
‘.txt’,
‘_’ || TO_CHAR(SYSDATE, ‘DD_MON_RRRR_HH24_MI_SS_AM’) || ‘.txt’
commit;
RETURN L_ROWCOUNT;
end TABLE_LOAD;
Note: when you run the function then it will also modify the source flat file with timestamp , so that we can have the track like which file was loaded .
3) Check if the user is having UTL_FILE privileges or not :
SQL> SELECT OWNER,
OBJECT_TYPE
FROM ALL_OBJECTS
WHERE OBJECT_NAME = ‘UTL_FILE’
AND OWNER =<>;
If the user is not having the privileges then grant “UTL_FILE” to user from SYS user:
SQL> GRANT EXECUTE ON UTL_FILE TO <>;
4) In the function I have used two tables like:
import_hist table and badlog table to track the history of the load and another to check the bad log if it occurs while doing the load .
Under the same user create an error log table to log the error out records while doing the import:
SQL> CREATE TABLE badlog
errm VARCHAR2(4000),
data VARCHAR2(4000) ,
error_date TIMESTAMP
Under the same user create Load history table to log the details of the file and tables that are imported with a track of records loaded:
SQL> create table IMPORT_HIST
FILENAME varchar2(200),
TABLE_NAME varchar2(200),
NUM_OF_REC number,
IMPORT_DATE DATE
5) Finally run the PLSQL block and check if it is loading properly or not if not then check the badlog:
Execute the PLSQL block to import the data from the USER:
SQL> declare
P_TABLE varchar2(200):=<>;
P_DIR varchar2(200):=<>;
P_FILENAME VARCHAR2(200):=<>;
v_Return NUMBER;
BEGIN
v_Return := TABLE_LOAD(
P_TABLE => P_TABLE,
P_DIR => P_DIR,
P_FILENAME => P_FILENAME,
P_IGNORE_HEADERLINES => P_IGNORE_HEADERLINES,
P_DELIMITER => P_DELIMITER,
P_OPTIONAL_ENCLOSED => P_OPTIONAL_ENCLOSED
DBMS_OUTPUT.PUT_LINE(‘v_Return = ‘ || v_Return);
end;
6) Once the PLSQL block is been executed then check for any error log table and also the target table if the records are been successfully imported or not. -
How can one read a Excel File and Upload into Table using Pl/SQL Code.
How can one read a Excel File and Upload into Table using Pl/SQL Code.
1. Excel File is on My PC.
2. And I want to write a Stored Procedure or Package to do that.
3. DataBase is on Other Server. Client-Server Environment.
4. I am Using Toad or PlSql developer tool.If you would like to create a package/procedure in order to solve this problem consider using the UTL_FILE in built package, here are a few steps to get you going:
1. Get your DBA to create directory object in oracle using the following command:
create directory TEST_DIR as ‘directory_path’;
Note: This directory is on the server.
2. Grant read,write on directory directory_object_name to username;
You can find out the directory_object_name value from dba_directories view if you are using the system user account.
3. Logon as the user as mentioned above.
Sample code read plain text file code, you can modify this code to suit your need (i.e. read a csv file)
function getData(p_filename in varchar2,
p_filepath in varchar2
) RETURN VARCHAR2 is
input_file utl_file.file_type;
--declare a buffer to read text data
input_buffer varchar2(4000);
begin
--using the UTL_FILE in built package
input_file := utl_file.fopen(p_filepath, p_filename, 'R');
utl_file.get_line(input_file, input_buffer);
--debug
--dbms_output.put_line(input_buffer);
utl_file.fclose(input_file);
--return data
return input_buffer;
end;
Hope this helps. -
Using Selection screen and selection screen output
Hi All,
I am trying to execute AT SELECTION-SCREEN and AT SELECTION-SCREEN output. Both the para's working fine seperately. But when I execute them together AT SELECTION-SCREEN output is not working. Please let me know how to solve this problem. Please see below for the code.
PARAMETERS: p_werks LIKE marc-werks OBLIGATORY MEMORY ID WRK,
p_lgort LIKE mard-lgort OBLIGATORY,
p_rlgort LIKE mard-lgort OBLIGATORY.
PARAMETERS: p_boml TYPE c RADIOBUTTON GROUP mode user-command flag.
SELECTION-SCREEN: BEGIN OF BLOCK b1 WITH FRAME TITLE text-001.
PARAMETERS: p_aufnr LIKE aufk-aufnr MODIF ID cp2.
SELECTION-SCREEN: END OF BLOCK b1.
*SELECTION-SCREEN COMMENT 1(44) text-004 FOR FIELD p_cmpl.
PARAMETERS: p_cmpl TYPE c RADIOBUTTON GROUP mode.
SELECTION-SCREEN: BEGIN OF BLOCK b2 WITH FRAME TITLE text-002.
PARAMETERS: p_matnr type marc-matnr MODIF ID cp1,
p_verid type afpo-verid MODIF ID cp1,
p_labst type mard-labst MODIF ID cp1.
SELECTION-SCREEN: END OF BLOCK b2.
PARAMETERS: p_mstr TYPE c RADIOBUTTON GROUP mode.
AT SELECTION-SCREEN output.
LOOP AT SCREEN.
IF p_boml <> 'X' AND
screen-group1 = 'CP1'.
screen-active = '1'.
MODIFY SCREEN.
ENDIF.
IF p_cmpl <> 'X' AND
screen-group1 = 'CP2'.
screen-active = '1'.
MODIFY SCREEN.
ENDIF.
MODIFY SCREEN.
ENDLOOP.
AT SELECTION-SCREEN.
IF p_boml EQ 'X'.
IF p_AUFNR EQ space.
MESSAGE e000(z1) WITH 'Please fill Production Order.'.
ENDIF.
endif.
IF p_cmpl EQ 'X'.
IF p_MATNR EQ space OR p_verid EQ space OR p_labst EQ space.
MESSAGE e000(z1) WITH text-003 'Production Version & Quantity. '.
ENDIF.
endif.
Thanks,
SenthilHi Senthil,
As far as my knowledge is concerned AT Selection-Screen output and AT Selection-Screen wont work together.In this code you are trying to do the validation in AT Selection-Screen. Instead of that try doin your validations in Start-of-selection Event.
i,e., modify your code as follows:
PARAMETERS: p_werks LIKE marc-werks OBLIGATORY MEMORY ID WRK,
p_lgort LIKE mard-lgort OBLIGATORY,
p_rlgort LIKE mard-lgort OBLIGATORY.
PARAMETERS: p_boml TYPE c RADIOBUTTON GROUP mode user-command flag.
SELECTION-SCREEN: BEGIN OF BLOCK b1 WITH FRAME TITLE text-001.
PARAMETERS: p_aufnr LIKE aufk-aufnr MODIF ID cp2.
SELECTION-SCREEN: END OF BLOCK b1.
*SELECTION-SCREEN COMMENT 1(44) text-004 FOR FIELD p_cmpl.
PARAMETERS: p_cmpl TYPE c RADIOBUTTON GROUP mode.
SELECTION-SCREEN: BEGIN OF BLOCK b2 WITH FRAME TITLE text-002.
PARAMETERS: p_matnr type marc-matnr MODIF ID cp1,
p_verid type afpo-verid MODIF ID cp1,
p_labst type mard-labst MODIF ID cp1.
SELECTION-SCREEN: END OF BLOCK b2.
PARAMETERS: p_mstr TYPE c RADIOBUTTON GROUP mode.
AT SELECTION-SCREEN output.
LOOP AT SCREEN.
IF p_boml <> 'X' AND
screen-group1 = 'CP1'.
screen-active = '1'.
MODIFY SCREEN.
ENDIF.
IF p_cmpl <> 'X' AND
screen-group1 = 'CP2'.
screen-active = '1'.
MODIFY SCREEN.
ENDIF.
MODIFY SCREEN.
ENDLOOP.
START-OF-Selection.
Perform validation.
form validation.
IF p_boml EQ 'X'.
IF p_AUFNR EQ space.
MESSAGE e000(z1) WITH 'Please fill Production Order.'.
ENDIF.
endif.
IF p_cmpl EQ 'X'.
IF p_MATNR EQ space OR p_verid EQ space OR p_labst EQ space.
MESSAGE e000(z1) WITH text-003 'Production Version & Quantity. '.
ENDIF.
endif.
endform.
Kindly reward if useful.
Thanks,
pavithra -
Selection Screen and Selection Button
Hi,
I have put in a screen this
SELECTION-SCREEN PUSHBUTTON /01(20) p_0031 USER-COMMAND _0031.
But It never enters 'at user-command' event !
What should i do ?Hi Stephan
If you specify the USER-COMMAND addition, the pushbutton must be assigned a function code fcode. The function code fcode must be specified directly and can only contain a maximum of 20 characters.
Before you can work with the pushbutton, you must specify a TABLES statement to declare an interface work area for the structure SSCRFIELDS from the ABAP Dictionary.
If the user selects the pushbutton on the selection screen, the runtime environment triggers the event AT SELECTION-SCREEN and the function code fcode is transferred to the ucomm component in the interface work area sscrfields.
Regards
Santosh
Maybe you are looking for
-
Cannot find file symbol not showing up
Hi - I have just done a massive move and backup etc. Things are going fine - just learned that every time you "reorganized" itunes music the entire file structure changes so a real back up with something like SyncBack totally ***** but... The questio
-
Webservice to RFC Scenario - Through Java Mapping
Hello All, In my integration scenario, I will receive a request from a webservice consumer. The webservice is my outbound interface. Now I have to write a Java Mapping for it because a similar interface (file to RFC) has been implemented using it and
-
Can Acrobat create forms which pull info from Excel for the fields?
Any suggestions on how to create multiple documents using fields from an Excel spreadsheet? I need to create over 400 of the same document but need personal information in each one, so not sure if this is something which I can do with Acrobat or if I
-
Help needed to install Flash Player : 'Non-Current Release' problem!
I been encountering problems while trying to install Flash Player on my laptop running Windows 7. Originally Flash Player does not work as I understand it is not supported on 64-bit Internet Explorer. After installing 32-bit IE, the following issue o
-
Can anyone help - Adobe Illustrator CS5.1 quit unexpectedly.
I have just prchased a Mac Book Pro with CS5.1 OSX 10.8.3. As my PC laptop died on Monday. Now illustrator keeps quitting unexpectedly every five minutes or so. Someone suggested changing the time zone, but it seems locked. I am just a desinger - wit