Difference between Airport Extreme 2011 and Airport Extreme Model

Is there a difference between Airport Extreme MD031LL/A and Airport Extreme MC340LL/A?

To get a detailed review of the 5G AirPort Extreme please check out this SmallNetBuilder article.

Similar Messages

Difference between Crsytal Report 2011 and Crystal Report for Enterprise 4

difference between Crystal Report 2011 and Crystal Report for Enterprise 4.0?
I think Crystl Reprt 2011 has more function, is it right?

Hi,
I recently attended a SAP Virtual trianing on SAP Business Objects BI 4.0.
Here are few extracts from that which probably shows some light to you:
SAP Crystal Reports 2011
1. UI and associated processing servers remain the same as CR 2008
2. Incremental update to CR 2008 with a few new features*
3. Continue to provide current CR 2008 functionality as-is for existing customers
SAP Crystal Reports for Enterprise 4.0
1. Major update & redesign of the Crystal Reports Designer and associated processing servers
2. Focus on streamlined report design, reporting against BI 4.0 Universe, & reporting against SAP BW data
3. Provide the foundation for all future releases of Crystal Reports
Differences between these two releases:
Data Source & Usage Type                                       General Recommendation
1. SAP BusinessObjects BI 4.0                                        SAP Crystal Reports Relational Universe (UNX) for Enterprise
OLAP Universe (UNX)
2. SAP NetWeaver BW 7 BEx Query (BICS)                    SAP Crystal Reports for Enterprise
3. SAP NetWeaver BW 3.5 BEx Query                             SAP Crystal Reports 2011
4. SAP Profitability Cost Management                              SAP Crystal Reports for Enterprise through Analysis View
SAP Strategy Management
SAP Budget, Planning and Consolidation
SAP Extended Analytics
5. Platform Driven Alerting                                                SAP Crystal Reports for Enterprise
6. Business Views                                                           SAP Crystal Reports 2011
7. Direct RDBMS or OLAP access                                    SAP Crystal Reports 2011
    SAP ERP/ Live Office Content/
    Enterprise search content
Regards
Gowtham

What is the difference between MacBook pro 2011 and 2012

What is the difference between MacBook pro 2011 and 2012

understanding that at the time of the question, there has not been any Macbook Pro 2012, now it is later and there is.
The difference is:
-CPU being used (2011 models: Sandy Bridge, 2012 models: Ivy Bridge)
-Graphics (2011: intel 3000 + on 15"/17" ATI, 2012: intel 4000 + on 5"/17" nvidia Geforce 650M)
-USB (2011: USB2.0 only, 2012: USB3.0)
-Bluetooth (2011. 2.1 + EDR, 2012: 4.0)
Ivy Bridge CPUs are smaller and are a little bit more energy-efficient.
Other than that, currently the devices are not much different in respect to performance (Apple's graphics driver performance is known to increase during upgrades, though, so the performance gap may widen up)

What is the difference between the iPad "3" and the latest model

I saw that the "new" iPad was recently replaced at the same time the "Mini" was released. What is the difference between the iPad "3" and the newest model?

The two differences that I can see are the new processor for the 4th gen iPad - the A6X which is supposed to be twice as fast as the current 3rd gen, and the new Lightning connector cable on the 4th gen.
Essentially that's all that there is ... Both have the retina display, iOS 6, same size, and so on.

Difference between the 5 ghz and the 2.4 ghz network on the Airport Extreme

Strenght signal-wise, is there a difference between the 5 ghz and the 2.4 ghz network on the Airport Extreme?
Is the 5 ghz network on the Airport Extreme the 802.11n signal that is supossed to have better speed and strenght than the 802.11g spec?
I am confused because I can not tell the difference in performance between both signal on my new A.E.

The laws of physics always dictate that in order to gain something....let's say speed....you have to give up something else.
In return for higher speed capabilities, 5 GHz signals are not as strong as 2.4 GHz signals, so they do not travel as far, or penetrate obstructions as well as 2.4 GHz signals.
If your Mac is in close proximity to the AirPort Extreme, it will probably connect to the 5 GHz band. If you take your Mac to the other end of the house, it will probably connect to the 2.4 GHz band. The point is, the Mac will choose the best signal quality and connect automatically based on its location in relation to the AirPort Extreme.
If you are curious to know which band the Mac is connecting to at an given time, hold down the option key on your Mac while you click on the fan shaped AirPort icon and look for the Channel setting. You will see either 2.4 GHz or 5 GHz displayed.

Creating a bridge with airport extreme (base) and airport express

i am having trouble creating a bridge with airport extreme (base) and airport express. i got the airport express to connect to my network. Airtunes sees it fine. i have an iMac (running Tiger) connected to the airport express via ethernet which i was hoping to get internet on (the iMac doesn't not have built in wireless and i had a spare airport express). now the airport express is no longer visible to the airport setup assistant on that iMac. but, like i mentioned, Airtunes is working fine, and the light is green.
i'm new to the wireless stuff. i am sure i just missed a step. how do i get the iMac to connect to the internet via my airport express bridging to my airport extreme wireless network?
your help is appreciated.

You can do this with the equipment you have. Configure the AirPort Extreme base station (AEBS) to act as a WDS main base station and configure the AirPort Express (AX) to act as a WDS remote base station. That will allow you to use the Ethernet port on the AX.
Unfortunately WDS also causes the available wireless bandwidth to be cut in half.

What is the performance difference between an Oct 2011 i5 and a June 2012 i7 in performance if they both have 16GB RAM

what is the performance difference between an Oct 2011 i5 and a June 2012 i7 in performance if they both have 16GB RAM

At least. The Core i7 can drive up to 8 concurrent 64-bit threads, more than an i5. Plus the 2011 models used the Sandy Bridge family of Intel chips, whereas the 2012 are the latest Ivy Bridge, that uses a much faster, less latency architecture.

Difference between Time Capsule 2009 and 2011

What is the spec difference between Time Capsule 2009 and 2011? I am looking at refurbished Time Capsules and the discriptions dont really help me.
• 2 TB, w/Simultaneous Dual-Band Wi-Fi, Originally released October 2009 – $249 CAD
• 2 TB, Originally released June 2011 – $259 CAD
tnx

jizzlets wrote:
I dont get what the "Simultaneous Dual-Band WIFI" means. Is that a good thing?
Means it uses both 2.4ghz band and 5ghz at the same time.. Most N wireless is 2.4ghz.. some can do either 2.4 or 5ghz.. but not at the same time.. TC can do both at the same time. It is a good thing.
Also, is it a good thing that it has been used 6-12 months?
No, it is not good.. but you have no idea of the history of the product. For a time capsule that matters. If it has been used for 12months, that comes off the lifespan at the other end.
For what you save buying new might be well worth it.

Difference between Logic Pro 9 and Logic Studio?

I have garage band and I notice that the instruments available are extremely limited, so I am looking to upgrade solely for the idea of getting more instruments and more features. Does the app store Logic Pro 9 have the extensive amount of official instruments to download for free? Or are there additional costs if you are looking to purchase the instruments for the app store logic 9?
I know that the studio version has mainstage, compressor and other programs etc, but what I am looking to find out is if there is a difference between what instruments, resources and materials found in the $210 Logic 9 and the Logic Studio version that you can't download for free from inside Logic 9?
Thanks

Hi
Segall wrote:
Does the app store Logic Pro 9 have the extensive amount of official instruments to download for free?
The instruments themselves are embedded within the Logic application, with the exception of the sample libraries for the EXS24 and Ultrabeat. All of the content, including the various Jampacks and sample libraries are available to download
Segall wrote:
Or are there additional costs if you are looking to purchase the instruments for the app store logic 9?
No.... free
Segall wrote:
I know that the studio version has mainstage, compressor and other programs etc, but what I am looking to find out is if there is a difference between what instruments, resources and materials found in the $210 Logic 9 and the Logic Studio version that you can't download for free from inside Logic 9?
The "Studio" DVD's include the now defunct Soundtrack Pro, which had around 20G of loops, beds and sound FX. Some of that material is now available for Final Cut X.
A few utility programs are also missing (Waveburner etc).
CCT

AirPort Management Utility and AirPort Admin Utility

Is there a difference between AirPort Management Utility and Airport Admin Utility? I see that the Airport Management Utility has not been updated for a while while the Airport Admin Utility is more recent. Does the latter replace the former?
Thanks!

Is there a difference between AirPort Management Utility and Airport Admin Utility?
Yes, the Management Utility gives you the ability to monitor some aspects of your Apple base station.
The AirPort Admin Utility allows you configure and control the Apple base station.
Does the latter replace the former?
No

Differences between PowerBook G3 400 and G3 500

Are there any differences between a Pismo 400 and a Pismo 500? If I buy a 400 for spares, will I be able to use the parts in my 500? Many thanks. Dafydd

I think I need parts, yes. I now have two Pismos, both 500s. One is great shape appearance-wise and has a nice screen. I recently tried to install an airport card and a new optical drive in it, but the Pismo wouldn't recognise either, by which I mean that the system profiler just behaved as if they were not there. It works fine otherwise. I bought a second Pismo for not much and it is running the Airport card and the new optical drive just fine. So there is nothing wrong with the card or the new drive. Problem is, the Pismo bought for not much is pretty beat up and the screen is going. So, basically, I want to try and combine the two into one where everything works. What do you think the problem is with the first Pismo that won't recognise the new hardware? Thanks for any advice. Dafydd

Difference between center,edge mmcm and edge direct allignments

What is the difference between center, edge mmcm and edge direct allignments.

Both of these terms are used most often used (but not exclusively) when describing source synchronous interfaces.
Edge Aligned vs. Center Aligned
When a device uses source synchronous communication, be it a device that sends data to an FPGA (an input to the FPGA) or a an FPGA sending data to an external device (an output of the FPGA), the device needs to define and describe the timing relationship between the clock and the data that it is forwarding to the other device. The receiving data needs to know this timing relationship in order to devise a mechanism to capture the data.
The timing relationship can really be just about anything, but two types are common:
Edge Aligned:
This is the simplest for the transmitting device. The device simply generates the forwarded clock and data using the same mechanism. If the sending device is an FPGA, then it uses an internal clock to drive an ODDR that drives the forwarded clock, and uses the same clock to send the forwarded data, either using an IOB flip-flop (SDR) or an ODDR flip-flop (DDR).
Using this mechanism, the timing relationship is often (but not always) described as a skew; i.e. the data will change +/-200ps around the edge/edges of the clock.
Of course, this clock/data timing relationship can rarely be used "as is" by the recieving device, so the receiving device will be responsible for adding some delay or other mechanism to use the forwarded clock to capture the forwarded data (i.e. an MMCM shift or an IDELAY).
Center Aligned:
This is supposed to be the simplest mechanism for the receiver. The transmitter uses some internal structure to place the edges of the forwarded clock in the middle of the forwarded data valid window. In an FPGA (as a transmitter), an internal clock would drive an ODDR for the forwarded clock, but the forwarded data would be driven from either an IOB FF using an inverted clock (SDR) or an ODDR using a clock that is 90 degrees out of phase (DDR). (Or it could be vice versa - the data uses the normal clock, and the forwarded clock uses the inverted or 90 degree clock).
Using this mechanism, the clock/data relationship is often (but not always) defined as a provided setup/hold relationship around the forwarded clock; i.e. the data will be valid 1.5ns before the edge of the clock and remain valid for 1.5ns after the edge of the clock.
The idea is that using this timing relationship, the receiver should be able to use the forwarded clock as is to capture the forwarded data. In general, though, this is rarely true, since most devices don't have an equal required setup and hold time; so the receiver still needs to modify the clock/data relationship to center its required window in the provided window.
MMCM vs. Direct Capture
This is a different concept. Regardless of which alignment is used (edge, center or something in between), the receiver (now we are assuming it is the FPGA doing the reception) needs to implement some clocking mechanism to use the forwarded clock to capture the forwarded data. There are really two styles:
Direct Capture:
The forwarded clock is brought in and goes directly to a clock buffer (either BUFG/BUFH or BUFR/BUFIO), which is used to capture the incoming data. Generally (as I said above), the clock/data timing relationship needs to be changed, and when using this capture mechanism, this can only be accomplished using an IDELAY on the clock or data (or both). When done this way, the clock has a propagation delay through the delay element (the IDELAY)
MMCM Capture:
Here, the forwarded clock is brought in on a clock capable I/O, then through an MMCM and from there to a BUFG or BUFH (with feedback to the MMCM). When done this way, the "common" way of modifying the clock/data timing relationship is by adjusting the phase delay of the MMCM output clock.
There is a subtle but extremely important difference in Vivado (and SDC/XDC) between a propagation delay and a phase delay (or phase shift). It has to do with how the tool determines which clock edge will capture data that is generated by a particular clock edge.
When we use a set_input_delay, we describe to Vivado a data window associated with a particular clock edge. By default, that data window will be captured by the next edge of the clock. The definition of the next edge is different when using these two mechanisms.
When a clock edge is propagated through a delay element, the resulting clock is the same edge. Lets take the example of a 10ns clock (rising at 0ns, falling at 5ns) with a 2ns delay (using an IDELAY) capturing an SDR data. The rising edge at time 0ns will generate a data window. By default, it will be captured by the next clock edge, which is at 10ns. After the 2ns of propagation delay, the internal clock at 12ns will be used to capture the window.
When a clock is phase shifted, a new clock is generated. Using the same example using an MMCM, the output clock of the MMCM rises at 2ns and falls at 7ns (and rises again at 12ns). So, the data window defined by the first rising edge of the input clock (at time 0), will be captured by the next rising edge of the phase shifted clock, which is at 2ns (this 2ns rising edge of the phase shifted clock is the "next" edge after the 0ns edge that generated the data window). This is different than the previous example, where the internal edge at 12ns (not 2ns) would capture the first window.
As a result, the constraints you use to describe the timing relationship (the set_input_delay) needs to be different between these two styles. Its also a bit messy, since the constraints that are correct for an MMCM with 2ns (or even 0.01ns) of phase delay are not correct for an MMCM with 0ns of phase delay (which is a bit icky).
I hope that clears things up!
Avrum

Difference Between Web application design and Report Designer

Hi,
I have searched in the forum as well i Google it but still i am not clear the difference between Web application Designer and report Designer , why especially we go for WAD ? and what is not possible in Report designer which we can do in WAD Please some one explain me that would be great helpful to me. i am having lot of confusion in this issue.
thanks,
Gal

Hi,
The Report designer is completely for formating of your query and results. Here you have the flexibility to design your query(one/more) results in your own way.
The WAD is for displaying various web items at one short for a single/multiple query. And here you have the flexibility to do the XML coding on the web items, but not as much you have the flexibility on Report Designer.
But, Report designer will have more performance issues than WAD. So, generally it helps when you need extreme formating of your reports.
Hope this clears your doubt.
Regards,
Srinivas.

From ABAP view, what is the difference between version 4.7 and ECC 6.0 ?

Hi,
I am a ABAP developer. I want to know the difference between version 4.7 and ECC 6.0 from a programmer
perspective.
I also want to know what is obsoleted and what is enhanced.
Thanks.
Best Regards,
Chris Gu

I'm not sure if any of this is in your 4.7 version, but I know it wasn't available in our 4.6C before we upgraded and we have found the following extremely helpful in ECC 6.0:
1. The new ABAP Debugger - Search SDN and you'll probably find a bunch of info on these enhancements
2. The Enhancement Framework - this is a great new framework allowing enhancements to standard SAP programs without having to use "core Mods". Had we known about it prior to our upgrade, we could have probably eliminated 75% or so of our custom Z Programs which are copies of standard SAP code and 100% of our core mods (of which we only have a handful)
3. Code Inspector and more importantly the ability to turn it on to automatically run when releasing a transport.
4. The ABAP workbench has changed a bit with a new editor including some minimal code completion.
5. Automatic generation of services from any remote enabled function module.
These are just a few of the things that I've found helpful in an upgraded environment.

What is the difference between Wine, Wineskin, Winery and Wine Bottler, and how do I get Wine to *ACTUALLY* work in Mountain Lion?

Ok, so this is my first post here and I am admittedly terrible at forums. Someone might say, "This was addressed in the ___________ thread by __________! Go read it!" --- that may be so but I've spent enough hours trying to google this problem into submission to no avail based on what is apparently working for others, so I would like a chance to get specific answers to specific questions that aren't from Mar 2011, etc.
So first of all, I'm confused by all the various Wine programs/apps/whatevers. I've seen Wine, Wineskin, Winery, Wine Bottler, and at this point I wouldn't be surprised if there are even more than that. What's the difference between all of these and how do they work with one another? What do I actually need to get windows programs working?
All of my google searches have led me to people giving out fish, but no one giving out fishing lessons. I'm not a pro at mac and windows and all that, but I'm a fairly bright individual who gets VERY frustrated, very quickly, when I don't understand the why and how of something I'm attempting.
I've also found "answers" where the person attempting to help starts off helpful enough, but degrades into the most archaic of techno-babble after about 5-6 sentences. On the other hand, I've watched tutorials on youtube where the poster decides to skip (apparently crucial) sections of the tutorial, and mutters such gems as: "... you might wanna have to run Wine first before you can do anything, cuz I think it has to configure it and set up a bunch of stuff"
O.o
A happy medium between techno-babble and the most basic of explanations would be ideal for me, and I'd imagine for others as well.
Here is a summarized history of my relationship with Wine:
Diablo II - I downloaded this awesome thing which ended up being... uh... I guess Diablo II in a Wineskin "wrapper". I'm not sure, all I know is that it's a D2 icon, and if I go to 'show package contents', it's got C drive, Program Files, et cetera inside of it. I double click it, it launches D2, and it works like a dream. <3
'Vanilla Install' - That's what I heard someone call it. It was the command/terminal style install using xquartz and xcode found at http://www.davidbaumgold.com/tutorials/wine-mac/. I followed every instruction to the letter, and got all the way to '$ sudo port install wine', at which point it started going smoothly, free from the possible error he described regarding the installation of xcode, and then just failed after I left the room to use the restroom and came back. Please don't ask me to repeat what the error was, because honestly, after reading more things on the interwebs, I'm confused as to why it's even necessary to go through all of that, so I'd rather not try that route again anyways, rendering the error message quite possibly irrelevant.
Wine + Wine Bottler - So I decided to try to seek out an easier method, as I know that one must exist that doesn't involve command lines. I found a video tutorial at http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m0BBkISOcEA, and oh man would it be great if that method had actually worked. Again, I followed all instructions provided to procure my free fish, and at the point in the video where he declares that "xquarts or x11 will open" - it doesn't open. Nothing opens. I was trying to install Star Sonata, btw.
So here I am, thoroughly worn out, frustrated at all the random places Wine is installed on my mac now, and just want someone to explain it all, from top down, without getting toooooooo technical on me. I know that might be asking a lot...

## I know that the poster has already found a solution, but the following is a possible answer for others that have similar issues.
For Winebottler, just go to their website and download it. Run the program. Choose .wine as your prefix (best choice) or whatever suits you best. You'll need a functional X11. If you can't use the one that comes with your mac, download the latest one from the website.
If your issue is one with Winebottler's Wine not running correctly due to X11, then you have a pretty ugly problem, although a simple upgrade is the best solution (Upgrade XQuartz.app).
http://www.davidbaumgold.com/tutorials/wine-mac/#part-1
The above website is the easiest way to get REAL wine on your computer. First of all, Wineskin WInery, etc. are NOT WINE. They are 3rd party apps that may use Wine or may have originally part of Wine, but they are no longer up to date with Wine. WineBottler is currently up to date with the stable releases of Wine (but not the maintenence releases).
For the website tutorial and to run Wine on your mac without using a thrid party app, you will need to know a few things.
First, you will need to know basic control of the command line. That means, sudo (you must know the administrator password to your computer), and the forms of cd (change directory).
Second, you will need Xcode. Download 4.2 (stable) or whatever other versions you want, but beware: It is over 1 GB, and you will need time for it to work.
Third, you will need to get MacPorts and configure it. The tutorial should have this data.
When you download wine (use sudo port install wine-devel for the latest development release of wine), it will first download a lot of dependencies. This will take a while. After that, it will download wine itself.
After obtaining wine, to run a program, open the terminal.app window.
cd desktop/XYZ/ZYZ\ WRQ
The above will first enter the desktop, then folder XYZ, then folder ZYZ WRQ. From here,
wine th11e.exe
Or whatever executable you are trying to open. (Using Subterranean Animism as my example).
It should, in theory, run the program. Watch the terminal for errors. If there is an X11 problem, then it's not wine acting up. If the app crashes or has other issues, check the Wine Application Database to see if your app is compatible with wine.
If you have any further questions or other things, feel free to reply; I may or may not get back to you, but there's a good chance that someone will come in eventually. Otherwise, the Wine Wiki should have some information.

Difference between Airport Extreme 2011 and Airport Extreme Model

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for