Difference between using FM and class in alv

does anyone know what's the main difference between using FM to create alv and using class to create alv?
in what condition we usually use FM or class?

using FM we can create Classical and Interactive ALV Reports.
The classes are used to create the ALV Reports with OOPS concept.
Check this for basic concepts of OOPS
https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/sdn/go/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/b6cae890-0201-0010-ef8b-f970a9c41d47
https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/sdn/go/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/1591ec90-0201-0010-3ba8-cdcd500b17cf
https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/servlet/prt/portal/prtroot/com.sap.km.cm.docs/library/webas/abap/abap%20code%20samples/alv%20grid/abap%20code%20sample%20to%20display%20data%20in%20alv%20grid%20using%20object%20oriented%20programming.doc
Tabstrip
https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/sdn/go/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/022ba607-0301-0010-e382-fdedca553f5f
Editable ALV
https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/sdn/go/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/ec31e990-0201-0010-f4b6-c02d876ce033
Tree
http://www.sapdevelopment.co.uk/reporting/alv/alvtree/alvtree_usrint.htm
General Tutorial for OOPS
https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/sdn/go/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/e8a1d690-0201-0010-b7ad-d9719a415907
Reward Points if useful

Similar Messages

Difference between interface pool and class pool

Hi,
Can any body tell me the difference between Interface pool and Class pool.
thank you in advance.
regards

Hi,
Class and Interface Pools
This section discusses the structure and special features of class and interface pools for global classes.
Global Classes and Interfaces
Classes and interfaces are object types. You can define them either globally in the Repository or locally in an ABAP program. If you define classes and interfaces globally, special ABAP programs called class pools or interface pools of type K or J serve as containers for the respective classes and interfaces. Each class or interface pool contains the definition of a single class or interface. The programs are automatically generated by the Class Builder when you create a class or interface.
A class pool is comparable to a module pool or function group. It contains both declarative and executable ABAP statements, but cannot be started on its own. The runtime system can create runtime instances (objects) through a request using the CREATE OBJECT statement. These objects execute the statements of the class pool.
Interface pools do not contain any executable statements. Instead, they are used as containers for interface definitions. When you implement an interface in a class, the interface definition is implicitly included in the class definition.
Structure of a Class Pool
Class pools are structured as follows:
Class pools contain a definition part for type declarations, and the declaration and implementation parts of the class.
Differences From Other ABAP Programs
Class pools are different from other ABAP programs for the following reasons:
·        ABAP programs such as executable programs, module pools, or function modules, usually have a declaration part in which the global data for the program is defined. This data is visible in all of the processing blocks in the program. Class pools, on the other hand, have a definition part in which you can define data and object types, but no data objects or field symbols. The types that you define in a class pool are only visible in the implementation part of the global class.
·        The only processing blocks that you can use are the declaration part and implementation part of the global class. The implementation part may only implement the methods declared in the global class. You cannot use any of the other ABAP processing blocks (dialog modules, event blocks, subroutines, function modules).
·        The processing blocks of class pools are not controlled by the ABAP runtime environment. No events occur, and you cannot call any dialog modules or procedures. Class pools serve exclusively for class programming. You can only access the data and functions of a class using its interface.
·        Since events and dialog modules are not permitted in classes, you cannot process screens in classes. You cannot program lists and selection screens in classes, since they cannot react to the appropriate events. It is intended to make screens available in classes. Instead of dialog modules, it will be possible to call methods of the class from the screen flow logic.
Local Classes in Class Pools
The classes and interfaces that you define in the definition part of a class pool are not visible externally. Within the class pool, they have a similar function to local classes and interfaces in other ABAP programs. Local classes can only be instantiated in the methods of the global class. Since subroutines are not allowed in class pools, local classes are the only possible modularization unit in global classes. Local classes have roughly the same function for global classes as subroutines in function groups, but with the significant exception that they are not visible externally
Reward points if useful....
Regards
AK

Difference Between Business Object And Class Object

Hi all,
Can any one tel me the difference between business object and class Object....
Thanks...
..Ashish

Hello Ashish
A business object is a sematic term whereas a class (object) is a technical term.
Business objects are all important objects within R/3 e.g. sales order, customer, invoice, etc.
The business objects are defined in the BOR (transaction SWO1). The have so-called "methods" like
BusinessObject.Create
BusinessObject.GetDetail
BusinessObject.Change
which are implemented (usually) by BAPIs, e.g.:
Business Object = User
User.Create => BAPI_USER_CREATE1
User.GetDetail => BAPI_USER_GET_DETAIL
CONCLUSION: Business Object >< Class (Object)
Regards
Uwe

Difference between using Java and Non-Java in Webi.

Hi ,
I have one more question requesting for an answer.
Would like to know what is the Difference between using Java and Non-Java in Webi.
Thank You in advance.
Appana Ganesh.

Hi,
check the Information in following post, the differences are discussed there:
http://scn.sap.com/thread/3295306
best regards,
Victor

Difference Between Using MVC And SwingUtilities For GUI Component Update

Hi Guys,
What are the difference of using the MVC (Model View Controler) pattern to update GUI and using the SwingUtilities of doing the same job?
Are there any big differences or shortcomings of any?
Thanks.

kap wrote:
Hi Guys,
What are the difference of using the MVC (Model View Controler) pattern to update GUI and using the SwingUtilities of doing the same job?
Are there any big differences or shortcomings of any?
Thanks.Your question is akin to asking, "What's the difference between using a car to get somewhere versus stepping on the gas pedal to do the same job?"
The use of SwingUtilities to update the "view" only pertains to updating components in a thread-safe manner, it has nothing to do with MVC. MVC would govern when the view gets updated (i.e. after the model changes), while SwingUtilties would be used to specify how the view gets updated.

Difference between using Binding and Value Attribute

what is the deference between using binding and value attribute, when I use binding attribute at the time of Value change listener is behaving like action listener,
Ex:
If I use value attribute, at the time of value change listener the component is not showing the result in the component but when I use Binding attribute it is happening automatically. So I want to know how the binding attribute is working.
I know, at the time of binding attribute the component is creating an instance at the bean side, So even also how it is following the life cycle of the JSF Frame work, and also Please suggest me weather which one is better to use either Binding or Value?

JNaveen wrote:
If I use value attribute, at the time of value change listener the component is not showing the result in the component but when I use Binding attribute it is happening automatically. So I want to know how the binding attribute is working.You need to learn about the JSF lifecycle. The ValueChangeEvent is invoked after conversion and validation in the 3rd phase, while the model values are updated in the 4th phase. In the valueChangeListener method you normally use ValueChangeEvent#getNewValue() to get the new value after the change.
I know, at the time of binding attribute the component is creating an instance at the bean side, So even also how it is following the life cycle of the JSF Frame work, and also Please suggest me weather which one is better to use either Binding or Value?Use the 'value' attribute to bind the value to the bean. Use the 'binding' attribute to bind the component to the bean. If you don't need to precreate the component or do other things than getting/setting its value, then there is no need for the 'binding' attribute.
Read on those links if you want to know something more about the JSF lifecycle:
[http://balusc.blogspot.com/2006/09/debug-jsf-lifecycle.html].
[http://jcp.org/aboutJava/communityprocess/final/jsr252/index.html] (pick 1st download).

Difference between "new classname()" and class.forName("...")?

Hi,
Please clarify me : What is the difference between the instnce creation by using new operator *( new ClassName())* and instance creation using class.forName("fully Qualified Name");
thanks
Gaurav

The compiler can tell you whether new ClassName() will be valid. For the other, you have to wait until runtime to know for sure.
new ClassName(...) can be invoked with arguments, and you provide them directly and simply. If you want to reflectively create an instance using a constructor that takes arguments, it's a more convoluted process.
Using new, you know which checked exceptions can be thrown and you catch them directly. Using reflection, you have to catch some other exception and unravel its cause.
You can use reflection (Class.forName and its more complicated cousins) when you don't know the classname at compile time.You can't do this with new.
Don't use reflection unless you have to. It's more complex, somewhat less performant, and it denies you certain compile time checks.

What is the difference between instance variable and class variable?

i've looked it up on a few pages and i'm still struggling a bit maybe one of you guys could "dumb" it down for me or give and example of how their uses differ.
thanks a lot

Instance is variable, class is an object.What? "Instance" doesn't necessarily refer to variables, and although it's true that instances of Class are objects, it's not clear if that's what you meant, or how it's relevant.
if you declare one instance in a class that instance
should be sharing within that class only.Sharing with what? Non-static fields are not shared at all. Sharing which instance? What are you talking about?
if you declare one class object it will share
anywhere in the current program.Err...you can create global variables in Java, more or less, by making them static fields. If that's what you meant. It's not a very good practice though.
Static fields, methods, and classes are not necessarily object types. One can have a static primitive field.

Difference between DriverManager.registerDriver and Class.forName?

Hi all,
I've noticed that the Oracle JDBC driver specifically asks to use DriverManager.registerDriver instead of Class.forName. What is the difference btw those 2 methods in loading and registering the driver?
Thanks.

I am trying to understand the jdbc, odbc drivers better.
Does the class my.sql.Driver refer to a driver for MySql or is it a driver itself?
with the lines one and two commented out, the code works fine. but with lines one and three commented out and the dbDriver being as specified in line two; no connection is made to the database. Can anyone explain this? and when i do Class.forName(dbDriver), is there a class by that name?
//String dbDriver = "sun.jdbc.odbc.JdbcOdbcDriver"; //one
//String dbDriver = "my.sql.Driver"; //two
String dbDriver = "MySql ODBC 3.51 Driver"; //three
String dbSource = "jdbc:odbc:mydb";
try {
     Class.forName(dbDriver);
     conn = DriverManager.getConnection(dbSource);
     statement = conn.createStatement();
} catch(Exception exception) {
     System.out.println(exception.getMessage()+" from the "+exception.toString());
     System.exit(1);

Difference between using bootcamp and building partitions with disk utility

hy everybody,
i successfully bought a mac (that was easy , installed windows 7 with bootcamp (quite easy) and now i 'd like to add linux also (considering ubuntu).
before i try to do it with bootcamp i'd like to know what the impact could be...
so i wonder; what does boot camp do and why shouldn't i do it manually with disk utility?
all inputs are welcome
cheers

Why not start by filling out hardware in your profile .sig as it makes a difference.

Difference between use of IS and AS while creating a Package or Procedure

Hi,
Had an interview in one of the company.
They asked me this, "What is the difference between using IS and AS while creating Package or Stored Procedure ?".
I checked creating package with same IS and AS, but there is no issues.
Kindly clarify me on this.
Lots of thanks in advance.
Regards,
Shiva

>
Had an interview in one of the company.
They asked me this, "What is the difference between using IS and AS while creating Package or Stored Procedure ?".
>
Quite frankly my first response to them would be: why do you even care?
That would be quickly followed by: do you have any meaningful questions you would like to ask? Perhaps something that might actually be relevant to what you do here?
I personally don't care if someone has memorized the syntax required to create DDL/DML. I care whether they know how and when to use it.
Check the docs for the syntax diagram and from at least 9i on it will be similar to this from 9i
http://docs.oracle.com/cd/B10501_01/appdev.920/a96624/08_subs.htm
>
A procedure is a subprogram that performs a specific action. You write procedures using the syntax:
[CREATE [OR REPLACE]]
PROCEDURE procedure_name[(parameter[, parameter]...)]
[AUTHID {DEFINER | CURRENT_USER}] {IS | AS}
[PRAGMA AUTONOMOUS_TRANSACTION;]
[local declarations]
BEGIN
executable statements
[EXCEPTION
exception handlers]
END [name];
>
Here is the link for 11g
http://docs.oracle.com/cd/B28359_01/appdev.111/b28370/create_procedure.htm
Note that the syntax for some objects requires one or the other and will not accept both.
>
CURSOR x IS ...
TYPE x IS ...
SUBTYPE x IS ...
CREATE TABLE x AS subquery
SELECT x AS "y" FROM z AS "w"
WITH x AS (SELECT ...

What is the difference between list display and grid display in alv report

Hai genious
i am a new of the abap, i dont know the alv report, i have a small doubt, can u please tell me what is the main difference between list display and grid display in alv report
thanks&regards
chinnu

Hi ,
1. For all practical purposes, they are the same.
2. Some differences:
a) from abap coding point of view,
alv list is done with Function modules,
alv gris can also be done with FM,
but can also be done using OO concepts.
b) Alv grid (using oo concept) requires
designing the screen layout .
Hence, in one screen, we can show more
then one alv grid
(we cannot show more than
one alv list on one screen)
c) ALV grid uses ActiveX controls
present on the Presentation Server.
Hence, it consumes More Memory
on the presentation server.
d) ALV LIST is Display Only.
Whereas
ALV Grid Can Be made EDITABLE for entry purpose.
e) In alv grid, these options are possible,
but not in alv list.
without horizontal lines
without vertical lines
without cell merging during sorts
display total lines above the entries
I hope it helps.
Regards,
Mamta
Edited by: Mamta Verma on Nov 27, 2008 6:41 AM

Question about main difference between Java bean and Java class in JSP

Hi All,
I am new to Java Bean and wonder what is the main difference to use a Bean or an Object in the jsp. I have search on the forum and find some post also asking the question but still answer my doubt. Indeed, what is the real advantage of using bean in jsp.
Let me give an example to illustrate my question:
<code>
<%@ page errorPage="errorpage.jsp" %>
<%@ page import="ShoppingCart" %>

<jsp:useBean id="cart" scope="session" class="ShoppingCart" />
<html>
<head><title>Shopping Cart</title></head>
<body bgcolor="#FFFFFF">
Your cart's ID is: <%=cart.getId()%>.
</body>
<html>
</code>
In the above code, I can also create a object of ShoppingCart by new operator then get the id at the following way.
<code>
<%
ShoppingCart cart = new ShoppingCart();
out.println(cart.getId());
%>
</code>
Now my question is what is the difference between the two method? As in my mind, a normal class can also have it setter and getter methods for its properties. But someone may say that, there is a scope="session", which can be declared in an normal object. It may be a point but it can be easily solved but putting the object in session by "session.setAttribute("cart", cart)".
I have been searching on this issue on the internet for a long time and most of them just say someting like "persistance of state", "bean follow some conventions of naming", "bean must implement ser" and so on. All of above can be solved by other means, for example, a normal class can also follow the convention. I am really get confused with it, and really want to know what is the main point(s) of using the java bean.
Any help will be highly apprecaited. Thanks!!!
Best Regards,
Alex

Hi All,
I am new to Java Bean and wonder what is the main
difference to use a Bean or an Object in the jsp. The first thing to realize is that JavaBeans are just Plain Old Java Objects (POJOs) that follow a specific set of semantics (get/set methods, etc...). So what is the difference between a Bean and an Object? Nothing.
<jsp:useBean id="cart" scope="session" class="ShoppingCart" />
In the above code, I can also create a object of
ShoppingCart by new operator then get the id at the
following way.
ShoppingCart cart = new ShoppingCart();
out.println(cart.getId());
...Sure you could. And if the Cart was in a package (it has to be) you also need to put an import statement in. Oh, and to make sure the object is accessable in the same scope, you have to put it into the PageContext scope. And to totally equal, you first check to see if that object already exists in scope. So to get the equivalant of this:
<jsp:useBean id="cart" class="my.pack.ShoppingCart"/>Then your scriptlet looks like this:
<%@ page import="my.pack.ShoppingCart %>
<%
ShoppingCart cart = pageContext.getAttribute("cart");
if (cart == null) {
    cart = new ShoppingCart();
    pageContext.setAttribute("cart", cart);
%>So it is a lot more work.
As in my mind, a normal class can also
have it setter and getter methods for its properties.True ... See below.
But someone may say that, there is a scope="session",
which can be declared in an normal object.As long as the object is serializeable, yes.
It may be
a point but it can be easily solved but putting the
object in session by "session.setAttribute("cart",
cart)".Possible, but if the object isn't serializable it can be unsafe. As the point I mentioned above, the useBean tag allows you to check if the bean exists already, and use that, or make a new one if it does not yet exist in one line. A lot easier than the code you need to use otherwise.
I have been searching on this issue on the internet
for a long time and most of them just say someting
like "persistance of state", "bean follow some
conventions of naming", "bean must implement ser" and
so on. Right, that would go along the lines of the definition of what a JavaBean is.
All of above can be solved by other means, for
example, a normal class can also follow the
convention. And if it does - then it is a JavaBean! A JavaBean is any Object whose class definition would include all of the following:
1) A public, no-argument constructor
2) Implements Serializeable
3) Properties are revealed through public mutator methods (void return type, start with 'set' have a single Object parameter list) and public accessor methods (Object return type, void parameter list, begin with 'get').
4) Contain any necessary event handling methods. Depending on the purpose of the bean, you may include event handlers for when the properties change.
I am really get confused with it, and
really want to know what is the main point(s) of
using the java bean.JavaBeans are normal objects that follow these conventions. Because they do, then you can access them through simplified means. For example, One way of having an object in session that contains data I want to print our might be:
<%@ page import="my.pack.ShoppingCart %>
<%
ShoppingCart cart = session.getAttribute("cart");
if (cart == null) {
    cart = new ShoppingCart();
    session.setAttribute("cart", cart);
%>Then later where I want to print a total:
<% out.print(cart.getTotal() %>Or, if the cart is a JavaBean I could do this:
<jsp:useBean id="cart" class="my.pack.ShoppingCart" scope="session"/>
Then later on:
<jsp:getProperty name="cart" property="total"/>
Or perhaps I want to set some properties on the object that I get off of the URL's parameter group. I could do this:
<%
ShoppingCart cart = session.getAttribute("cart");
if (cart == null) {
    cart = new ShoppingCart();
    cart.setCreditCard(request.getParameter("creditCard"));
    cart.setFirstName(request.getParameter("firstName"));
    cart.setLastName(request.getParameter("lastName"));
    cart.setBillingAddress1(request.getParameter("billingAddress1"));
    cart.setBillingAddress2(request.getParameter("billingAddress2"));
    cart.setZipCode(request.getParameter("zipCode"));
    cart.setRegion(request.getParameter("region"));
    cart.setCountry(request.getParameter("country"));
    pageContext.setAttribute("cart", cart);
    session.setAttribute("cart", cart);
}Or you could use:
<jsp:useBean id="cart" class="my.pack.ShoppingCart" scope="session">
<jsp:setProperty name="cart" property="*"/>
</jsp:useBean>The second seems easier to me.
It also allows you to use your objects in more varied cases - for example, JSTL (the standard tag libraries) and EL (expression language) only work with JavaBeans (objects that follow the JavaBeans conventions) because they expect objects to have the no-arg constuctor, and properties accessed/changed via getXXX and setXXX methods.
>
Any help will be highly apprecaited. Thanks!!!
Best Regards,
Alex

What is the difference between interactive report and alv interactive repor

what is the difference between interactive report and alv interactive report
could u plz explain clearly.

Hi Rajesh,
interactive report or alv interactive report , both are same but except the viewer, Abap List Viewer (ALV).
Here in i am placing a sample simple ALV Interactive report.
Just double click on the customer number to go to the next screen.
*& Report ZKAL_ALV_INTERACTIVE_1                                      *
REPORT ZKAL_ALV_INTERACTIVE_1                  .
TYPE-POOLS: SLIS.
TYPES: BEGIN OF TY_KNA1,
          KUNNR TYPE KUNNR,
          NAME1 TYPE NAME1,
          ORT01 TYPE ORT01,
        END OF TY_KNA1.
TYPES: BEGIN OF TY_VBAK,
          VBELN TYPE VBELN,
          ERNAM TYPE ERNAM,
          ERDAT TYPE ERDAT,
          NETWR TYPE NETWR,
          WAERK TYPE WAERK,
         END OF TY_VBAK.
&--WORK AREA & TABLE DECLARATION--
DATA: W_KNA1 TYPE TY_KNA1.
DATA: T_KNA1 TYPE STANDARD TABLE OF TY_KNA1 INITIAL SIZE 1.
DATA: W_VBAK TYPE TY_VBAK.
DATA: T_VBAK TYPE STANDARD TABLE OF TY_VBAK INITIAL SIZE 1.
&--FIELDCAT TABLE & WORK AREA--
DATA: W_FCAT TYPE SLIS_FIELDCAT_ALV.
DATA: T_FCAT TYPE SLIS_T_FIELDCAT_ALV.
DATA: W_FCAT1 TYPE SLIS_FIELDCAT_ALV.
DATA: T_FCAT1 TYPE SLIS_T_FIELDCAT_ALV.
&--EVENT TABLE AND WORK AREA--
DATA: W_EVENTS TYPE SLIS_ALV_EVENT.
DATA: T_EVENTS TYPE SLIS_T_EVENT.
DATA: W_EVENTS1 TYPE SLIS_ALV_EVENT.
DATA: T_EVENTS1 TYPE SLIS_T_EVENT.
&--COMMENT TABLE & WORK AREA--
DATA: W_COMMENT TYPE SLIS_LISTHEADER.
DATA: T_COMMENT TYPE SLIS_T_LISTHEADER.
DATA: W_COMMENT1 TYPE SLIS_LISTHEADER.
DATA: T_COMMENT1 TYPE SLIS_T_LISTHEADER.
&----APPENDING FCAT -
W_FCAT-COL_POS = 1.
W_FCAT-FIELDNAME = 'KUNNR'.
W_FCAT-SELTEXT_M = 'CUST. NO'.
W_FCAT-HOTSPOT = 'X'.            "HOT SPOT HAND SYMBOL
W_FCAT-EMPHASIZE = 'C119'.       "FOR COLORING THE COLUMN 1
APPEND W_FCAT TO T_FCAT.
CLEAR W_FCAT.
W_FCAT-COL_POS = 2.
W_FCAT-FIELDNAME = 'NAME1'.
W_FCAT-SELTEXT_M = 'CUST. NAME'.
APPEND W_FCAT TO T_FCAT.
W_FCAT-COL_POS = 3.
W_FCAT-FIELDNAME = 'ORT01'.
W_FCAT-SELTEXT_M = 'CITY'.
APPEND W_FCAT TO T_FCAT.
W_FCAT1-COL_POS = 1.
W_FCAT1-FIELDNAME = 'VBELN'.
W_FCAT1-SELTEXT_M = 'ORDER NO'.
W_FCAT1-EMPHASIZE = 'C519'.
APPEND W_FCAT1 TO T_FCAT1.
CLEAR W_FCAT.
W_FCAT1-COL_POS = 2.
W_FCAT1-FIELDNAME = 'ERNAM'.
W_FCAT1-SELTEXT_M = 'NAME OF PARTY'.
APPEND W_FCAT1 TO T_FCAT1.
W_FCAT1-COL_POS = 3.
W_FCAT1-FIELDNAME = 'ERDAT'.
W_FCAT1-SELTEXT_M = 'DATE'.
APPEND W_FCAT1 TO T_FCAT1.
W_FCAT1-COL_POS = 4.
W_FCAT1-FIELDNAME = 'NETWR'.
W_FCAT1-SELTEXT_M = 'ORDER VALUE'.
APPEND W_FCAT1 TO T_FCAT1.
W_FCAT1-COL_POS = 5.
W_FCAT1-FIELDNAME = 'WAERK'.
W_FCAT1-SELTEXT_M = 'CURRENCY'.
APPEND W_FCAT1 TO T_FCAT1.
&--APPEND COMMENTRY--
W_COMMENT-TYP = 'H'.
W_COMMENT-INFO = 'CUSTOMER DETAILS'.
APPEND W_COMMENT TO T_COMMENT.
CLEAR W_COMMENT.
&--APPEND EVENTS TABLE--
W_EVENTS-NAME = 'TOP_OF_PAGE'.
W_EVENTS-FORM = 'TOPPAGE'.
APPEND W_EVENTS TO T_EVENTS.
W_EVENTS-NAME = 'USER_COMMAND'.
W_EVENTS-FORM = 'SUB2'.
APPEND W_EVENTS TO T_EVENTS.
W_EVENTS1-NAME = 'TOP_OF_PAGE'.
W_EVENTS1-FORM = 'TOPPAGE1'.
APPEND W_EVENTS1 TO T_EVENTS1.
CLEAR W_EVENTS1.
W_EVENTS1-NAME = 'USER_COMMAND'.
W_EVENTS1-FORM = 'SUB3'.
APPEND W_EVENTS1 TO T_EVENTS1.
SELECT-OPTIONS: CUSTNO FOR W_KNA1-KUNNR.
SELECT KUNNR
         NAME1
         ORT01 FROM KNA1 INTO TABLE T_KNA1
         WHERE KUNNR IN CUSTNO.
CALL FUNCTION 'REUSE_ALV_GRID_DISPLAY'
EXPORTING
   I_CALLBACK_PROGRAM                = 'ZKAL_ALV_INTERACTIVE_12'
   I_BACKGROUND_ID                   = 'BIKE'
   I_GRID_TITLE                      = 'CUSTOMER DETAILS'
   IT_FIELDCAT                       = T_FCAT
   IT_EVENTS                         = T_EVENTS
TABLES
    T_OUTTAB                          = T_KNA1 .
FORM TOPPAGE.
CALL FUNCTION 'REUSE_ALV_COMMENTARY_WRITE'
    EXPORTING
      IT_LIST_COMMENTARY       = T_COMMENT
     I_LOGO                   = 'LOGO_ALV'.
ENDFORM. "END OF TOPPAGE SUB.
FORM SUB2 USING UCOMM LIKE SY-UCOMM FIELDS1 TYPE SLIS_SELFIELD.
READ TABLE T_KNA1 INTO W_KNA1 INDEX FIELDS1-TABINDEX.
SELECT VBELN
         ERNAM
         ERDAT
         NETWR
         WAERK
               FROM VBAK
               INTO TABLE T_VBAK
               WHERE KUNNR = W_KNA1-KUNNR.
CALL FUNCTION 'REUSE_ALV_GRID_DISPLAY'
EXPORTING
   I_CALLBACK_PROGRAM                = 'ZKAL_ALV_INTERACTIVE_12'
   I_BACKGROUND_ID                   = 'KALEEM'
   I_GRID_TITLE                      = 'LIST OF ORDERS'
   IT_FIELDCAT                       = T_FCAT1
   IT_EVENTS                         = T_EVENTS1
TABLES
    T_OUTTAB                          = T_VBAK.
ENDFORM.    "END OF SUB2.
FORM TOPPAGE1.
&--APPEND COMMENTRYOF SECONDRY SCREEN--
W_COMMENT1-TYP = 'H'.
W_COMMENT1-INFO = 'LIST OF ORDERS'.
APPEND W_COMMENT1 TO T_COMMENT1.
W_COMMENT1-TYP = 'S'.
W_COMMENT1-KEY = 'CUSTOMER'.
W_COMMENT1-INFO = W_KNA1-KUNNR.
APPEND W_COMMENT1 TO T_COMMENT1.
CLEAR W_COMMENT.
W_COMMENT1-TYP = 'A'.
W_COMMENT1-INFO = W_KNA1-NAME1.
APPEND W_COMMENT1 TO T_COMMENT1.
CLEAR W_COMMENT1.
CALL FUNCTION 'REUSE_ALV_COMMENTARY_WRITE'
    EXPORTING
      IT_LIST_COMMENTARY       = T_COMMENT1
     I_LOGO                   = 'LOGO_ALV'
REFRESH T_COMMENT1.
ENDFORM.    "END OF TOPPAGE1
FORM SUB3 USING UCOMM LIKE SY-UCOMM FIELDS1 TYPE SLIS_SELFIELD.
    READ TABLE T_VBAK INTO W_VBAK INDEX FIELDS1-TABINDEX.
SET PARAMETER ID 'AUN' FIELD W_VBAK-VBELN.
CALL TRANSACTION 'VA02' AND SKIP FIRST SCREEN.
ENDFORM.
U can also find some of the useful codes on WIKI-SDN.
Reward helpful Answers.
Regds,
Kaleem.

Are there any differences between using Adobe Illustrator on a MAC and on a PC?

Hello,
I'm about go enroll in a class specialized for teaching Adobe Illustrator in order to be able to use the program at work. The company that I work at uses Macintosh computers to deal with clerical work and everything, so I would like to know if there are any differences between using Adobe Ilustrator on a MAC and on a PC. The school that offers training teaches two types of classes, where one uses Illustrator on a MAC, and the other one on a PC. The PC class is able to have an earlier start date, which is why I'm sort of leaning towards choosing that class as I need to be able to use the software as soon as possible, but if there are main differences between the interface that will affect my knowledge of using Illustrator on a MAC after I take the class with Windows systems, then I will most likely be waiting for the class teaching in MAC systems.
Thanks in advance for the help!
Oh and another suggestion- should I take the Illustrator class in CS6 or CS5?

Reading through the CS5 vs CS6 performance thread, the Mac version seems to have worse performance than Windows version. From a starter's perspective the differences would most likely never be realized. It will take some time to see differences between even CS5 and CS6 other than the visual aspect of course.
Definitely take the CS6 versionso you can say you have it. CS5 is my preferred version, CS6 is garbage with the bugs it has for the type of work I use it for.

Difference between using FM and class in alv

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for