Different Calculations based on Hierarchy Level

Hi Experts,
I have a requirement to do different calculations of results based on the hierarchy level.
For example:
Level A - (total of maximums)
             Level B.1 - (maximum)
             Level B.2 - (maximum)
                    Level C
I need Level B to be the maximum and Level A to bo the total of the maximum values in Level B.
For example I may have a maximum in B.1 of 100 and a maximum of 200 in B.2
I then need to get a total of 300 in appearing in level A. Currently if I apply the maximum in the calculate results, it displays 200 in level A.
I then need to use these numbers at each level in formulas.
I am using BI 7.0.
Any ideas?
Thanks in advance!

Hi GreenHorn123,
According to your description, you want to apply condition with only one case statement which can affect any product region dimension. Right?
In Analysis Services, it's not supported to use one reference pointing to all available dimensions which the lower level hierarchy has same name. In this scenario, it's better to create one dimension which combines all the products region. You can have a
higher level for [Product-XX Region].
If you have any question, please feel free to ask.
Regards,
Simon Hou
TechNet Community Support

Similar Messages

How to define primary interaction based on hierarchy level

I have a 3 level product dimension, such as brand, product type, and product. Now I want to define primary interaction based on the level. If click on brand or product type, it will be drill down. If click on product, it will be send master-detail. Since there is only one column for this dimension on the report when report is constructed, how can I apply different interaction based on the product level?
Thanks

iif you are trying to do a normal hierarchical drill down from brand down to product type down to product, and if they are defined so in your database, defining a normal hierarchy is suffice.
iif you are trying to navigate to a different level in a hierarchy, do a pre-defined drill down.
all the above options must be defiend in RPD.
if your Q is not answered can you please elaborate further with the existing example.
-bifacts
http://www.obinotes.com

Auto.Reorder point calculation based on service level-calculation incorrect

Hi
I have gone through all the postings pertaining to this topic.Still I am not getting the calculation steps despite of using the same proposed in many of the threads.
My calculation and system calculation as follows:
Service level maintain in MRP2 view was 99.8, so R factor must be 4.00 as per the chart given in sap help.
Planned delivery was 10 days. Material is externally procured. No GR processing time. Schedule margin key was also 000.
Forecast was executed for next 3 months based on past history of 12 months. (Moving average method).
Forecast values for 03.2010 = 140, 04.2010 = 140, 05.2010 = 140.
MAD calculated by system and shown while executing forecast in material master was 48. Safety stock calculated by system was 108 and re-order point was 157.
Since lead time is shorter than forecast period, SS = RWMAD = 4(10/31)48 = 61.94
W = Lead time in days/Forecast period in days.
LTC (Lead time consumption) = 140*10/31 = 45.16
ROP = SS + LTC (lead time consumption) = 61.94 + 45.16 = 107.
Where as system proposal was 157.
Kindly throw some light where is the problem.
Thanks in advance.

Hi
It would be grateful if somebody throws light on the above scenario.

Formatting Based on Hierarchy level (Dynamically)

Hi Every one,
I came across a requirement like as show below.
Where ever the Hierarchy level is 2 in the rows then the entire columns should be colored as yellow...The rows should vary dynamically but the columns are static
Please help me to reach the above requirement.
Regards,
Saida Reddy G

Hi Mic,
First I want say Thank you for your replies...I need one clarification we are selecting some members on Based on pop up, see the below image as reference.
Based on which criteria the cross tab will give a drop list in Based on selection. I dont understand the how it is picking the members in the dropdown list ... If I know this thing I reach my requirement.
I hope you people got my point.....
regards,
Saida Reddy G

Measure calculation based on hierarchy

Hi
I have flatten an account table to form a hierarchy of 5 levels, each level in this hierarchy will have a flag about account type,
So what I need now is a calculation which has to dynamically change according to this account flag object.
For instance, when account flag is u201CEu201D then the calculation should multiplied with minus. But I have 5 levels of hierarchy also with 5 account flags.
How can I consider these 5 account flags at a time to update the measure, is that possible in Web Intelligence?
I hope the following example for table structure can help to understand the problem.
Acct 1     flag1     acct2     flag2     acct3     flag3     acct4     flag4     acct5     flag5
AAA     R     AAf     E     AAD     E     AAD     E     VVv     L
BBB     R     DDG     E     EFR     R     AAD     L     ERR     R
CCC     E     FGF     R     DFS     E     SDD     R     FDF     E
I have created the five levels accts and flags as individual objects in universe and using it in the webi report as follows,
Report:
Account ( drillable to 5 level)                 Calculate.measure
AAA                                           545464
BBB                                          1654546
CCC                                           - 4674697
The above report should work in a way like when I drill down into account for the next level say. Acct2 , then it should check with corresponding flag (flag2 ) for its calculations (whether to add u2013 or + symbol)
Similarly on entering each level by drilling down, the calculation or formula should behave like above scenario, like it should check the flag and update the calculation
Is this possible ?
What kind calculation should I use ?
Thanks
Dineshkumar

Thanks for the your time and response.we don't have a year range column i might need to create one in rpd wondering if there is a way to do it in the analyses directly. I created a year range in the analyses by writing a case statement in one of the year columns. As per your suggestion here i might not be able to use a yer range in the measure denominator By year range.

OBIEE 11g - formatting hierarchy levels

Hi, I'm playing with the new hierarchy functionality in 11g. I've found in the criteria tab where it's possible to give the dimension members different formats based on what level of the hierarchy they are at (using the "Hierarchy Level Properties" dialog). This formats the dimension lables appropriately, But I also want the associated numbers to inherit the same formatting. Is there any way to do this?
Thanks!
Scott

Ok, that's too bad. No way to format individual items, we're talking about thousands of accounts in an account hierarchy. I'll put in an enhancement request for this feature. I guess one related question, is there any way in answers to add a column that returns what level of a hierarchy the given row is at? If I could do that, then I could format the measures conditionally based on that column?
Thanks,
Scott

Aggregating data loaded into different hierarchy levels

I have some problems when i try to aggregate a variable called PRUEBA2_IMPORTE dimensinated by time dimension (parent-child type).
I read the help in DML Reference of the OLAP Worksheet and it said the follow:
When data is loaded into dimension values that are at different levels of a hierarchy, then you need to be careful in how you set status in the PRECOMPUTE clause in a RELATION statement in your aggregation specification. Suppose that a time dimension has a hierarchy with three levels: months aggregate into quarters, and quarters aggregate into years. Some data is loaded into month dimension values, while other data is loaded into quarter dimension values. For example, Q1 is the parent of January, February, and March. Data for March is loaded into the March dimension value. But the sum of data for January and February is loaded directly into the Q1 dimension value. In fact, the January and February dimension values contain NA values instead of data. Your goal is to add the data in March to the data in Q1. When you attempt to aggregate January, February, and March into Q1, the data in March will simply replace the data in Q1. When this happens, Q1 will only contain the March data instead of the sum of January, February, and March. To aggregate data that is loaded into different levels of a hierarchy, create a valueset for only those dimension values that contain data. DEFINE all_but_q4 VALUESET time
LIMIT all_but_q4 TO ALL
LIMIT all_but_q4 REMOVE 'Q4'
Within the aggregation specification, use that valueset to specify that the detail-level data should be added to the data that already exists in its parent, Q1, as shown in the following statement. RELATION time.r PRECOMPUTE (all_but_q4)
How to do it this for more than one dimension?
Above i wrote my case of study:
DEFINE T_TIME DIMENSION TEXT
T_TIME
200401
200402
200403
200404
200405
200406
200407
200408
200409
200410
200411
2004
200412
200501
200502
200503
200504
200505
200506
200507
200508
200509
200510
200511
2005
200512
DEFINE T_TIME_PARENTREL RELATION T_TIME <T_TIME T_TIME_HIERLIST>
-----------T_TIME_HIERLIST-------------
T_TIME H_TIME
200401 2004
200402 2004
200403 2004
200404 2004
200405 2004
200406 2004
200407 2004
200408 2004
200409 2004
200410 2004
200411 2004
2004 NA
200412 2004
200501 2005
200502 2005
200503 2005
200504 2005
200505 2005
200506 2005
200507 2005
200508 2005
200509 2005
200510 2005
200511 2005
2005 NA
200512 2005
DEFINE PRUEBA2_IMPORTE FORMULA DECIMAL <T_TIME>
EQ -
aggregate(this_aw!PRUEBA2_IMPORTE_STORED using this_aw!OBJ262568349 -
COUNTVAR this_aw!PRUEBA2_IMPORTE_COUNTVAR)
T_TIME PRUEBA2_IMPORTE
200401 NA
200402 NA
200403 2,00
200404 2,00
200405 NA
200406 NA
200407 NA
200408 NA
200409 NA
200410 NA
200411 NA
2004 4,00 ---> here its right!! but...
200412 NA
200501 5,00
200502 15,00
200503 NA
200504 NA
200505 NA
200506 NA
200507 NA
200508 NA
200509 NA
200510 NA
200511 NA
2005 10,00 ---> here must be 30,00 not 10,00
200512 NA
DEFINE PRUEBA2_IMPORTE_STORED VARIABLE DECIMAL <T_TIME>
T_TIME PRUEBA2_IMPORTE_STORED
200401 NA
200402 NA
200403 NA
200404 NA
200405 NA
200406 NA
200407 NA
200408 NA
200409 NA
200410 NA
200411 NA
2004 NA
200412 NA
200501 5,00
200502 15,00
200503 NA
200504 NA
200505 NA
200506 NA
200507 NA
200508 NA
200509 NA
200510 NA
200511 NA
2005 10,00
200512 NA
DEFINE OBJ262568349 AGGMAP
AGGMAP
RELATION this_aw!T_TIME_PARENTREL(this_aw!T_TIME_AGGRHIER_VSET1) PRECOMPUTE(this_aw!T_TIME_AGGRDIM_VSET1) OPERATOR SUM -
args DIVIDEBYZERO YES DECIMALOVERFLOW YES NASKIP YES
AGGINDEX NO
CACHE NONE
END
DEFINE T_TIME_AGGRHIER_VSET1 VALUESET T_TIME_HIERLIST
T_TIME_AGGRHIER_VSET1 = (H_TIME)
DEFINE T_TIME_AGGRDIM_VSET1 VALUESET T_TIME
T_TIME_AGGRDIM_VSET1 = (2005)
Regards,
Mel.

Mel,
There are several different types of "data loaded into different hierarchy levels" and the aproach to solving the issue is different depending on the needs of the application.
1. Data is loaded symmetrically at uniform mixed levels. Example would include loading data at "quarter" in historical years, but at "month" in the current year, it does /not/ include data loaded at both quarter and month within the same calendar period.
= solved by the setting of status, or in 10.2 or later with the load_status clause of the aggmap.
2. Data is loaded at both a detail level and it's ancestor, as in your example case.
= the aggregate command overwrites aggregate values based on the values of the children, this is the only repeatable thing that it can do. The recomended way to solve this problem is to create 'self' nodes in the hierarchy representing the data loaded at the aggregate level, which is then added as one of the children of the aggregate node. This enables repeatable calculation as well as auditability of the resultant value.
Also note the difference in behavior between the aggregate command and the aggregate function. In your example the aggregate function looks at '2005', finds a value and returns it for a result of 10, the aggregate command would recalculate based on january and february for a result of 20.
To solve your usage case I would suggest a hierarchy that looks more like this:
DEFINE T_TIME_PARENTREL RELATION T_TIME <T_TIME T_TIME_HIERLIST>
-----------T_TIME_HIERLIST-------------
T_TIME H_TIME
200401 2004
200402 2004
200403 2004
200404 2004
200405 2004
200406 2004
200407 2004
200408 2004
200409 2004
200410 2004
200411 2004
200412 2004
2004_SELF 2004
2004 NA
200501 2005
200502 2005
200503 2005
200504 2005
200505 2005
200506 2005
200507 2005
200508 2005
200509 2005
200510 2005
200511 2005
200512 2005
2005_SELF 2005
2005 NA
Resulting in the following cube:
T_TIME PRUEBA2_IMPORTE
200401 NA
200402 NA
200403 2,00
200404 2,00
200405 NA
200406 NA
200407 NA
200408 NA
200409 NA
200410 NA
200411 NA
200412 NA
2004_SELF NA
2004 4,00
200501 5,00
200502 15,00
200503 NA
200504 NA
200505 NA
200506 NA
200507 NA
200508 NA
200509 NA
200510 NA
200511 NA
200512 NA
2005_SELF 10,00
2005 30,00
3. Data is loaded at a level based upon another dimension; for example product being loaded at 'UPC' in EMEA, but at 'BRAND' in APAC.
= this can currently only be solved by issuing multiple aggregate commands to aggregate the different regions with different input status, which unfortunately means that it is not compatable with compressed composites. We will likely add better support for this case in future releases.
4. Data is loaded at both an aggregate level and a detail level, but the calculation is more complicated than a simple SUM operator.
= often requires the use of ALLOCATE in order to push the data to the leaves in order to correctly calculate the aggregate values during aggregation.

How to generate a Yearly report based on a calculation at the Month level

Have the need to create a report as follows. Any ideas on how this can be accomplished in OBI is appreciated. I have already tried different ways but non worked for me.
The data is stored in a table at day level as follows:
Day Amount_A Amouont_B
1/1/2008     100     100
1/15/2008     200     100
2/1/2008     100     400
2/15/2008     300     200
1/1/2009     100     300
1/15/2009     100     200
2/1/2009     200     100
2/15/2009     400     300
The report should be displayed at Year level. Amount_A is just the summation of Amount_A from the table at daily level rolled up to the Year level in the Time dimension. The same thing for Amount_B.
The formula for Absolute_Error is Absolute(Amount_A - Amount_B). But the problem is that it has to be calculated at the Month level instead of Day Level. So following is the logic for Absolute_Error:
Month     Amount_A Amount_B     Absolute_Error
Jan-2008     300     200     100
Feb-2008     400     600     200
Jan-2009     200     500     300
Feb-2009     600     400     200
The report should be displayed as follows:
Year Amount_A Amount_B     Absolute_Error
2008     700     800     300
2009     800     900     500
Note that the calculation of Absolute_Error results in a different value if it is calculated at the Month level and summed up to Year than if it were calculated at the Day level and then summed up to Year. It is required to be based on Month level for this report.
Is there a way to do this without having to build an aggregated fact table at the Month level?

Hi.
Do this:
1. Create Amount_A and Amount_B in BMM without SUM as default aggregation rule.
2. Now, just go to Answers and make report with three columns:
YEAR -- EXPRESSION 1 -- EXPRESSION 2
EXPRESSION 1 is:
sum(Amount_A) - sum(Amount_B)
EXPRESSION 2 is:
sum
abs
sum(Amount_A by MONTH)
sum(Amount_B by MONTH)
My example in Answers:
TIMES.CALENDAR_YEAR
sum(SALES.QUANTITY_SOLD_NORMAL) - sum(SALES.AMOUNT_SOLD_NORMAL)
sum( abs(sum(SALES.QUANTITY_SOLD_NORMAL by TIMES.CALENDAR_MONTH_DESC) - sum(SALES.AMOUNT_SOLD_NORMAL by TIMES.CALENDAR_MONTH_DESC) ) )
This will first summarize amount A and amount B on a month level and then do a difference, after that ABS and then sum on the year level.
This is workaround to avoid larger RPD changes.
Regards,
Goran O
http://108obiee.blogspot.com/

Drill in BW hierarchy level in webi based on input control selection

Hello Experts,
I have a requirement in Webi. The Webi report is based on BW hierarchy and it is using hierarhcy both in the report output block and also in the report prompts. We are are BI 4.0 SP5,Patch 6. The report has input controls in it based on the BW Hierarchy. When the report is first executed,the user can drill down the hierarchy by clicking on the "+" nodes to the max level as shown in the screenshot below.
Now, when the user selects an input control, the data gets filtered but the hierarchy level automatically expands. In other words, when they select a data hierarchy showed in the input control the hierarchy in table is shown expanded and they want to see the hierarchy in the table close automatically.
So ideally its like this when a value from input control is selected.
Whereas the user wants it to be like this automatically on selecting a particular value from the input control and not in expanded form.
I'm aware of the Hierarchy depth function but that only takes us to a particular node based on depth and then doesn't allow further drilling after that.
Is there any setting in webi/bex about always keeping all sub nodes closed to prevent this expansion on selection of input control?
Thanks and regards,
Abhishek

Just did some research on on this and the SAP best practice: The question itself is logically incorrect.
A report/table filter where there is a hierarchy may remove rows without respecting the hierarchy structure. For this reason, a filter can remove a parent node currently expanded and keep leaves or
nodes collapsed. To avoid returning an empty table in this case the system automatically expands the hierarchy in the block to shows the resulting members
Thats why it automoatically expands the hierarchy.
Closing this thread. Thanks.

Group a report based on a hierarchy level

Hi,
I'm struggling with a query that I'd like to group a report based on the selection of a hierarchy level.
Here's the situation: I've got a table with a "normal" hierarchy, say the EMP table from SCOTT with its EMPNO and MGR columns. What I'd like to have is a report that gives me the sum of the SAL column group by all members on a given hierarchy level. So fi, if I choose LEVEL = 1, Id like to see the overall total, if I choose LEVEL = 2, I'd like to see the sum of salary of all employees managed by this respective manager etc.
I know that there are possibilities to denormalize the table first and try to solve it from there, but what I'd like to know is whether anybody is aware of a more generic way to achieve that? What I could accept is a hard coded limitation of the number of nested levels, as this seems to be very hard to achieve in SQL.
In the real scenario, I'm using only balanced trees, so from that point of view, the reports will be consistent.
Any ideas?
Thanks, Jürgen

select l, sum(salary) from (SELECT last_name, employee_id, manager_id, salary, LEVEL l
FROM employees
START WITH employee_id = 100
CONNECT BY PRIOR employee_id = manager_id) where l > :input_level
group by l;

Different Essbase properties based on hierarchy that need to be exported to EPMA

Hello All,
I need to export Essbase and Planning dimensions that contain multiple hierarchies. Several of the node properties are different across the hierarchies. For example, Node 123 would have a '+' for PlanAggreation1 in Hierarchy 1 and a '~' for PlanAggregation1 in Hierarchy 2. I am trying to use the EPMA Export profiles. I can use different properties to collect the different property values per hierarchy but not sure how to include them in the export. Ideas? Recommendations are much appreciated!

Hello All,
I need to export Essbase and Planning dimensions that contain multiple hierarchies. Several of the node properties are different across the hierarchies. For example, Node 123 would have a '+' for PlanAggreation1 in Hierarchy 1 and a '~' for PlanAggregation1 in Hierarchy 2. I am trying to use the EPMA Export profiles. I can use different properties to collect the different property values per hierarchy but not sure how to include them in the export. Ideas? Recommendations are much appreciated!

Displaying all GL accounts according to hierarchy level(Based on ERGSL)

Hi all,
I have a requirement to display balance sheet and PL account for the given period...
1. I have to select all G L account numbers (BSEG-HKONT) with their amounts which belongs to same group (i.e. for those ERGSL value is same).
2.Display sum at each hierarchy level with respect to company codes.
From table FAGL_011ZC we can find the range of GL account (lower limit-VONKT upper limit-BISKT) and ERGSL using VERSN.
In T-code FSE2 we can see the hierarchy levels.
The table FAGL_011PC will get parent ane child relation ship for ERGSL.
I have to display all these GL accounts according to hierarchy leve.
please help me out in this regard.(if there any similer code it would be a great help).
Thank you all in advance!!!!
Ravi

Hi Bhanu,
thanks for your fast response, but this did not help. To make it more clear:
Lets assume, I have the following hierarchy:
<Root>
|
+- Good Customers
| |
| +- Customer_A
| |
| +- Customer_B
|
+- Bad Customers
    |
    +- Customer_C
    |
    +- Customer_D
I have the customer in the free characteristics of a more complex query. I restricted it to the hierarchy node "Good Customers".
In the web template i use a "Dropdown Box" with the customer as the assigend characteristic and read mode "Dimension".
In this example the dropdown box would show the entries
- All values
- Customer_A
- Customer_B
But I would like to see the entries
- All values
- Good customers
I already tried various settings in the query definition concerning the display hierarchy of the customer char with no success yet.
Regards,
Philipp

BEx report -two different calculations for a result for one key figure how?

All,
Maybe someone could help me with the following, we have a requirement to setup for one key figure two calculations for result rows. One result (average) for one level, and on a higher level -grand total have a (sum), as for our business it makes sense to do it this way. We have setup average for this KF, we get correct results (see below values 7,5 & 6,5) however for the grand total (across multiple products) so for one level up we need to have a different calculation. How could we achieve this?
Here is an example:
location     product          inventory
AAAA     11111          5
AAAA     11111          5
AAAA     11111          10
AAAA     11111          10
AAAA     Result          7,5      ---> average
AAAA     22222          5
AAAA     22222          6
AAAA     22222          7
AAAA     22222          8
AAAA     Result          6,5       -
> average
AAAA     Result (across products)          14      ---> here I want to have a sum of averages

This could be achieve only IF you upload a hierarchy for product inventory with different levels, wherein each level show subtotals and finally grand total will be shown at the end of the results.

Rollup calculations in Account hierarchy (parent-child type)

Hi,
I want to create a parent-child relationship type Account hierarchy using Universe. The hierarchy has to support different set of calculations for roll ups action for different branches in the same level.
Eg.
      Balance Sheet
          (+)Assets
          (-)Liabilities and Owners Equity
      Net Income
       (+)Operating Profit
       (+)Other Income and Expenses
       (-)Taxes
Balance Sheet = Assets -Liabilities and Owners Equity
Net Income = Operating Profit + Other Income and Expenses - Taxes
Regards, Sujeev

Measures automatically roll up.
Whether you define your measure with an aggregate or not, if the projection is set to Sum, it will roll up.
Measures that are to be summed should have Sum() wrapped round them at the universe level though.
What you may have is a lot of positive values in your database and no negatives.
If that's the case, you will need to use a case statement to determine the sign of the value.
E.g.
Sum(CASE WHEN Type='Asset' THEN table.value WHEN Type='Liability' THEN -1*table.value ELSE 0 END)

Calculation based on date key figures in BEx

Hi Friends,
Hi Friends,
I need to creat report for sales order data, which involved the calculation based on dates.
In my cune iam having the data at the granual level with the dates as key figures. the calculation that i need to do is VTW = Actual PGI date - Customer want date.
1) whn i run the report at the granual level my VTW is working correctly. No issues.
2) when i run the report at higher levels the date fields are updated with X, as the system is unable to aggrigate the dates. The dates are at the material level in a sales order. I need to show the VTW at the sales order level (each one of the two dates are same for all the materials). So, when i run the report with out mataril at the sales order level...i wanto sea the bothe date fields in a single line and also the VTW calculated as the different between throse two dates.
3) Once we get the VTW correctly at the sales orde level. if i drill down the report for material, i want to sea both the dates in every record againest the matarial, but the VTW only aginest the first record...that is againest the sales order. I dont waht the VTW value repeated/duplicated for all the records againest the sales order,as VTW makes sence only at the Sales Order level.
Please suggest me hwo i can achive the resulsts by meeting both Point 2 and 3.
Thanks for ur help...in advance.
Thanks,
Renu

Hi..
I have the data from the extractore and in the cube as below.
SALES ORDER    ITEM                MATERIAL            DATE1                         DATE2
101                        Item1               Mat1              01/01/2010                15/01/2010
101                        Item2               Mat2              01/01/2010                15/01/2010
101                       Item3                Mat3             01/01/2010                15/01/2010
I need the reports as below...
Report1:
SALES ORDER        DATE1                         DATE2                  VTW (DATE2 - DATE1)
101                        01/01/2010                15/01/2010                14
currently iam getting this Report1 output as below...
SALES ORDER        DATE1                         DATE2                  VTW (DATE2 - DATE1)
101                             X                                   X                           42
Report2: Out put required as below
SALES ORDER     ITEM                MATERIAL            DATE1                         DATE2      VTW (DATE2 - DATE1)
101                        Item1               Mat1              01/01/2010                15/01/2010              14
101                        Item2               Mat2              01/01/2010                15/01/2010
101                   I     tem3                Mat3             01/01/2010                15/01/2010
currently iam getting this Report2 output as below...
SALES ORDER     ITEM                MATERIAL            DATE1                         DATE2      VTW (DATE2 - DATE1)
101                        Item1               Mat1              01/01/2010                15/01/2010              14
101                        Item2               Mat2              01/01/2010                15/01/2010               14
101                   I     tem3                Mat3             01/01/2010                15/01/2010               14
As VTW is need to be measued at the sales order level and we always have the DATE1 & DATE2 as same for all the itesm, it should be shon as only 14 in the first record. It mean once iget the required output from Report one in a single line with VTW as 14, it should not repeat with every line , when i dril down the report for Items or materials.
Even if i can generate oly report2 as required in a single sheet ...that will be enough.
Plas kindly provide some solution as how we can achieve this,
Thanks,
Renu

Different Calculations based on Hierarchy Level

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for