Different units in total sum row

Hello Bex Experts,
I have orders with different Units in a report. currently the total sum row show * for Mix
How can I get the total sum for ST and KG like
Total Sum 366 KG
Total Sum 342 ST
BR Matthias

Hi Matthias,
If you want to sum their numbers regardless of the UNITS, just use the NODIM() in formula..But if you need to add them and have 1 unit for the result, you must convert one of the them to another unit..
Regards,
Loed

Similar Messages

Different unit Measures Total in over all Result

Dear All,
The quantity is in different unit of measures like
Presently getting:
10PC
10KG
10PC
20KG
10ton
Total *
when add all those things the over result shows the *
when i go with CKF NODIM option i could not found againest which order kgs are there and for which order pcs are there.
So there is any option getting the overall result   total of different unit of measures .
I want as below
10PC
10KG
10PC
20KG
10ton
Over all Result :
20pc
30kg
10ton
like that I need any possibility , Unit converion doing at transforamation level based on the conversion factors
but the base unit of measure and Alternate unit of measures are different orders are having different units , so it should be added.
Please can anybody provide the some information.
Thanks & Regards,
Sathish

Hi,
Thanks for your kind responce,
which you said is ok to some extent , but the report looks not good
as per your idea the report output is below
order unit1    unit2    unit3   value     qty
1        x          kg        x      10000      20
2       to          x         x          5000     10
it looks like that , it is not good again the customer want total of the all units so the above one will not give
in which way i mentioned in same either it is possible or not
Once again thanks for kind responce and Idea
Thanks & Regards
sathish

How to Hide rows in ALV without affecting total sum at the end of table?

Hi,
I need some help in hiding particular rows in an ALV Grid without affecting the total sum at the end of the table. I am trying to hide the rows that have negative quantities, but I still need those values so that the user can still compute for the total sums. Can anyone help? Thanks.
Joseph

Hi,
Hopw this way you can hide the rows in the GRID.
DATA:
ld_column      TYPE lvc_fname,
ld_hide          TYPE abap_bool.
FIELD-SYMBOLS:
<ls_entry>     TYPE any,
<ld_fld>         TYPE any.
ld_column = 'COL_1'. " column which you want to suppress if everything is zero
ld_hide     = abap_true. " = 'X'; default hide column
LOOP at <gt_outtab> ASSIGNING <ls_entry>.
    ASSIGN COMPONENT (ld_column) OF STRUCTURE <ls_entry> TO <ld_fld>.
    IF ( <ld_fld>   > 0 ).
      ld_hide = abap_false. " display column because at least single value > 0
      EXIT. " leave LOOP
    ENDIF.
ENDLOOP.
READ TABLE gt_fcat INTO ls_fcat
                       WITH KEY fieldname = ld_column.
IF ( syst-subrc = 0 ).
    ls_fcat-no_out = ld_hide.
    MODIFY gt_fcat FROM ls_fcat INDEX syst-tabix.
ENDIF.
hop you will get the total with for those columns too.
Regards,
Madhavi

Deletion of Total(Aggregated Sum) rows in planning book

I want to get rid of 'Total(Aggregated Sum)' rows in planning book tables.
'Total' line is useful but too many lines are uncomfortable for planners, so we're searching for the method not to use it.
If you know how to configure or use macro for it, please let me know.
Thank you,
HyeRee

Hi,
I can delete totals, but I can´t delete subtotals.
Macro Delete Totals
IF
New condition
   PLOBS_FOR_LEVEL( ACT_LEVEL ) = 1
Step 1 iterations
   ROW Ratio 1
      ROW_VISIBLE( 0 )
   ROW Ratio 2
      ROW_VISIBLE( 0 )
   ROW Ratio n
      ROW_VISIBLE( 0 )
ENDIF
This macros works ok to deleting row totals.
Raúl.

Summarize total for Row items in pivot table

Hi,
I have a certain number of row items and few fact columns. 2 of the row items are level based measures that will summarize on other conditions so I cannot have them in the Fact section. But for these 2 row items (in the Rows section) I want them to summarize the values (a total sum under) as for the Fact columns, but it seems impossible to do this in a pivot table.
I tried everything. This is a very irritating limitation to Pivot tables. Anyone have a good solution to this? (I have to use Pivot table because I have numbers showing for each month, table view will not work for this)

Hi Alf,
Just for everyone else checking this post out, here is the image you posted.
!http://i45.tinypic.com/15x50r6.jpg!
Now I see what you are talking about. Based on that screen-shot and your post, it looks like three of your measures (Arsbudsjett, Lok. budsjett, Akk.regnskap) are placed in the "Rows" section of the pivot table because you don't want them pivoted on the month. You just want them displayed as a single column and you want to pivot the other measure by month.
However, it appears that OBIEE does not summarize items in the "Rows" section and only provides sub-totals for columns in the "Measures" section.
I have two follow up questions
1) What technique are you using to breakup the column "KOSTRA art"? There seems to be some kind of grouping at the value "Lenn og sosiale utgifter". What is special about that value on how is that grouping or break in the data created?
2) One of those three measures, Akk.regnskap, does have a sub-total but the other two, Arsbudsjett, Lok. budsjett, do not. What is different about Akk.regnskap that causes it to have a sub-totals?
Thanks for the follow up questions.
-Joe

How to get total sum of big filtered table?

Hello
I'm using JDeveloper 11.1.1.3.0
I have an af:table with big data source (100 000 rows). The table have filters.
I want to display total count of the filtered rows and total sum by the one of column of the filtered rows in the footer of the table.
In my backing bean I can get a Map with all filter values:
Map<String, Object> filters = ((FilterableQueryDescriptor)table.getFilterModel()).getFilterCriteria();And, in this case, I may create the method for getting sum I need on my own.
In this method I may create SQL Query dynamically, because I have to process all filter values with different types
It is possible, but, maybe, there is a more easy way to do it?
Anatolii

Hi, sanchezis
Code example.
In the jsp:
                <af:column sortProperty="Sumv" sortable="true" filterable="false" align="end" width="125px"
                           headerText="#{bindings.TransactionView1.hints.Sumv.label}" id="c16">
                  <af:outputText value="#{row.Sumv}" id="qt4">
                    <af:convertNumber maxFractionDigits="2" minFractionDigits="2"/>
                  </af:outputText>
                  <f:facet name="footer">
                      <af:panelGroupLayout id="pg41" halign="right"
                                           layout="vertical">
                    <af:outputText value="#{backing_reptransactions.tableTransactionTotalSumV}" id="ot44">
                      <af:convertNumber maxFractionDigits="2" minFractionDigits="2"/>
                    </af:outputText>
                    </af:panelGroupLayout>
                  </f:facet>
                </af:column>In the backing bean:
    public double getTableTransactionTotalSumV() {
        DCIteratorBinding iter =
            binding.findIteratorBinding("TransactionView1Iterator");
        TransactionViewImpl vo = (TransactionViewImpl)iter.getViewObject();
        return vo.getFilteredTotalSumV();
    }In the ViewImpl (TransactionViewImpl) class.
    public double getFilteredTotalSumV() {
        double sumV = 0d;
        DBTransaction dbTransaction = getDBTransaction();
        ResultSet rs = null;
        String query = "SELECT SUM(SumV) sumvtotal FROM (" + getQuery() + ")";
        String str1 = "WHERE ROWNUM < :Bind_RangePage_High";
        String str2 = "WHERE Z_R_N > :Bind_RangePage_Low";
        int i = query.indexOf(str1);
        if (i > 0) {
            query = query.substring(0, i) + " " + query.substring(i + str1.length());
        i = query.indexOf(str2);
        if (i > 0) {
            query = query.substring(0, i) + " " + query.substring(i + str2.length());
        PreparedStatement st = dbTransaction.createPreparedStatement(query, 0);
        try {
            Object[] params = this.getWhereClauseParams();
            int index = 0;
            for (Object avalue : params) {
                String key = (String)((Object[])avalue)[0];
                if ((!key.equals("Bind_RangePage_High")) &&
                    (!key.equals("Bind_RangePage_Low"))) {
                    Object value = ((Object[])avalue)[1];
                    index++;
                    if (value instanceof Integer) {
                        st.setInt(index, (Integer)value);
                    } else if (value instanceof oracle.jbo.domain.Date) {
                        st.setDate(index,
                                   ((oracle.jbo.domain.Date)value).dateValue());
                    } else if (value instanceof java.sql.Date) {
                        st.setDate(index, (Date)value);
                    } else {
                        st.setString(index, (String)value);
            rs = st.executeQuery();
            if (rs.next()) {
                sumV = rs.getDouble("sumvtotal");
        } catch (SQLException e) {
            throw new JboException(e);
        } finally {
            if (st != null) {
                try {
                    st.close();
                } catch (SQLException e) {
        return sumV;
    public long getFilteredTotalCount() {
        return this.getEstimatedRowCount();
    }But, you need to know that in the TransactionView in the "General" - "Tuning" I set up next values:
"All rows",
"As needed",
"Fill Last Page of Rows when Paging through Rowset",
"Passivate State(..."
Access Mode - "Range Paging Incremental"
Range Size - 160
Range Paging Cache Factor - 3
If you have other values, then your SQL request may be different, so, you will have to rewrite it.
I talk about
"WHERE ROWNUM < :Bind_RangePage_High",
"WHERE Z_R_N > :Bind_RangePage_Low",
                if ((!key.equals("Bind_RangePage_High")) &&
                    (!key.equals("Bind_RangePage_Low")))If you have other solution, please, tell me.
Anatolii

Total sum to be displayed in a table view control ?

Hi,
I am unable to display the total sum of a column in a table view control( using HTMLB ). How should one display the sum of a column ?
THanks in advance,
VaraPrasad

Hi,
it should work once you are restricting the capacity of the out put port then it should provide that much rows only otherwise its a Bug.
Alternativily you are tellin to disaply using sorting then add a Sort operator to the output port and the display ur output port in down order.
But first option should work just check it again.
On which SP u r working?
Regards,
Govindu

Displaying a total sum value in the af:table - footer

Hello everyone,
I have seen various threads on how to calculate a summary column based on a af:column in an af:table. I would like the value of this column to be displayed in the af:table -> footer (right undernead the af:column)
I'm having trouble putting together the pieces. This is the last requirement I have on this page, so hopefully I won't have to start all over.
Here this what I have:
I have created my page. (jspx) I did not create the page with a "backing bean". I have seen in various threads that the backing bean can be used to programmatically populate the table.
This is what I have done so far.
For the DataModel:
I have created my entity object, and I have a view assigned to the object. I assigned the view to my Application Module.
For the UserInterface:
On the layout, I dragged the instance of the view from the page definition. I created an af:table.
My questions/train of thought are:
I didn't create a "backing bean" when I first created my jspx page. From the various threads that I have seen, they all reference this. Can anyone explain how I can do this when the page has already been created? I'm using jdev version 10.1.3.3
Within the backing bean, I assume this is where I would then create a method that would do the "sum" of my column.
To display the column:
I would then create an af:output_text and drag it to theh table footer. The binding section
If anyone has a prior thread that I haven't found that can point me in the right direction with what I already I would really appreciate it.
Thanks

Kuba,
By creating a managed bean against the page definition, you are able to access the "iterator". The iterator is an object that is based off of hte View object (which the page is build off of)... From there, you can then loop through the rows and add them together to come up with the total sum.
You can then reference this method in the TEST.java class since it was created as a managed bean.
I believe I got the gist of it now... Coming from an Oracle Forms perspecitive, it is actually pretty similar. Now I understand what Managed Beans are used for. Thanks again for the great example.
Danny

How to set different colors for even odd rows in a data table

hi,
In my project i hav a data table. i am using jsf. i want the rows of the data table different colors for even, odd rows. can i do it just setting the row class property ? or there should be there some other way? please help.
sailajoy

Hope this helps
<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Strict//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-loose.dtd">
<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1" />
<title></title>
<style type='text/css'>
.scrollContent {
height:100px;
overflow-x:hidden;
overflow-y:auto;
.scrollContent tr {
height: auto;
white-space: nowrap;
.scrollContent tr td:last-child {
padding-right: 20px;
.fixedHeader tr {
position: relative;
height: auto;
top: expression( this.parentNode.parentNode.parentNode.scrollTop + 'px' );
div.TableContainer {
border: 1px solid #7DA87D;
.headerFormat {
background-color: white;
color: #C8D7B5;
margin: 3px;
padding: 1px;
white-space: nowrap;
font-family: Helvetica;
font-size: 16px;
text-decoration: none;
font-weight: bold;
.headerFormat tr td {
border: 1px solid #C8D7B5;
background-color: #666633;
.bodyFormat tr td {
     color: #000000;
     margin: 3px;
     padding: 1px;
     border: 0px none;
     font-family: Helvetica;
     font-size: 12px;
.alternateRow {
background-color: #C8D7B5;
</style>
<style type="text/css">
div.TableContainer {
height: 121px;
overflow-x:hidden;
overflow-y:auto;
</style>
</head>
<body>
<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0"><tr><td><div id="TableContainer" class="TableContainer" style="height:230px;">
<table class="scrollTable">
<thead class="fixedHeader headerFormat">
<tr class="title">
<td title="Sort" align="center"><b>NAME</b> </td>
<td title="Sort" align="center"><b>Amt</b> </td>
<td title="Sort" align="center"><b>Lvl</b> </td>
<td title="Sort" align="center"><b>Rank</b> </td>
<td title="Sort" align="center"><b>Position</b> </td>
<td title="Sort" align="center"><b>Date</b></td>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody class="scrollContent bodyFormat" style="height:200px;">
<tr class="alternateRow">
<td>Maha</td>
<td>
<input type="text" name="textfield" size="7" />
</td>
<td align="right"><input type="text" name="textfield2" size="7" /></td>
<td align="right"><input type="text" name="textfield3" size="7" /></td>
<td><input type="text" name="textfield4" size="7" /></td>
<td align="right"><input type="text" name="textfield5" size="7" /></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Thrawl</td>
<td align="right">$9,550</td>
<td align="right">159</td>
<td align="right">100%</td>
<td>Co-Owner</td>
<td align="right">11/07/2003</td>
</tr>
<tr class="alternateRow">
<td>Marhanen</td>
<td align="right">$223.04</td>
<td align="right">83</td>
<td align="right">99%</td>
<td>Banker</td>
<td align="right">06/27/2006</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Peter</td>
<td align="right">$121</td>
<td align="right">567</td>
<td align="right">23423%</td>
<td>FishHead</td>
<td align="right">06/06/2006</td>
</tr>
<tr class="alternateRow">
<td>Jones</td>
<td align="right">$15</td>
<td align="right">11</td>
<td align="right">15%</td>
<td>Bubba</td>
<td align="right">10/27/2005</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Supa-De-Dupa</td>
<td align="right">$145</td>
<td align="right">91</td>
<td align="right">32%</td>
<td>momma</td>
<td align="right">12/15/1996</td>
</tr>
<tr class="alternateRow">
<td>ClickClock</td>
<td align="right">$1,213</td>
<td align="right">23</td>
<td align="right">1%</td>
<td>Dada</td>
<td align="right">1/30/1998</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Mrs. Robinson</td>
<td align="right">$99</td>
<td align="right">99</td>
<td align="right">99%</td>
<td>Wife</td>
<td align="right">07/04/1963</td>
</tr>
<tr class="alternateRow">
<td>Maha</td>
<td align="right">$19,923.19</td>
<td align="right">100</td>
<td align="right">100%</td>
<td>Owner</td>
<td align="right">01/02/2001</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Thrawl</td>
<td align="right">$9,550</td>
<td align="right">159</td>
<td align="right">100%</td>
<td>Co-Owner</td>
<td align="right">11/07/2003</td>
</tr>
<tr class="alternateRow">
<td>Marhanen</td>
<td align="right">$223.04</td>
<td align="right">83</td>
<td align="right">59%</td>
<td>Banker</td>
<td align="right">06/27/2006</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Peter</td>
<td align="right">$121</td>
<td align="right">567</td>
<td align="right">534.23%</td>
<td>FishHead</td>
<td align="right">06/06/2006</td>
</tr>
<tr class="alternateRow">
<td>Jones</td>
<td align="right">$15</td>
<td align="right">11</td>
<td align="right">15%</td>
<td>Bubba</td>
<td align="right">10/27/2005</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Supa-De-Dupa</td>
<td align="right">$145</td>
<td align="right">91</td>
<td align="right">42%</td>
<td>momma</td>
<td align="right">12/15/1996</td>
</tr>
<tr class="alternateRow">
<td>ClickClock</td>
<td align="right">$1,213</td>
<td align="right">23</td>
<td align="right">2%</td>
<td>Dada</td>
<td align="right">1/30/1998</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Mrs. Robinson</td>
<td align="right">$99</td>
<td align="right">99</td>
<td align="right">(-10.42%)</td>
<td>Wife</td>
<td align="right">07/04/1963</td>
</tr>
<tr class="alternateRow">
<td>Maha</td>
<td align="right">-$19,923.19</td>
<td align="right">100</td>
<td align="right">(-10.01%)</td>
<td>Owner</td>
<td align="right">01/02/2001</td>
</tr>
<tr >
<td>Thrawl</td>
<td align="right">$9,550</td>
<td align="right">159</td>
<td align="right">-10.20%</td>
<td>Co-Owner</td>
<td align="right">11/07/2003</td>
</tr>
<tr class="alternateRow" >
<td><strong>TOTAL</strong>:</td>
<td align="right"><strong>999999</strong></td>
<td align="right"><strong>9999999</strong></td>
<td align="right"><strong>99</strong></td>
<td > </td>
<td align="right"> </td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</div></td></tr></table>
</body>
</html>

Omit the final SUM row in a report using breaks

We have a report using breaking whereby it is broken for current day, week to date and month to date. We want to use the column SUM feature so that we have a count of all records for the day, week to date and month to date.
This works fine, however we also get a final sum row on the bottom of the report which is a sum of the month, week and day count. This is meaningless as the month includes the week which in turn includes the day - all it gives is a useless large number! :)
Is there a way to stop this final column being displayed?
Thanks in advance

I have managed to remove the last row in a table using the following code:
<script type="text/javascript">
$(document).ready(function() {
$("#JK_TEST .t7standard tr:last").remove();
</script>However, the report uses a bottom border implemented using a <TR> so I actually need to remove the second to last row. I have tried to work out how to do this but am still trying!!! Any suggestions?
EDIT::
DONE IT!!! :D:D :D
Cheers for the help!
<script type="text/javascript">
$(document).ready(function() {
$("#JK_TEST .t7standard tr:last").prev($('<TR>')).remove();
</script>Cheers!
Edited by: /dev/null on Mar 24, 2009 4:49 PM

Total - Sum of a function

Hi All,
The following is a test I performed in order to check a problem I got.
I created a simple function in Oracle which receives a number and returns it divided by 2. (NUM/2). I registered this function in Discoverer Administrator and then created a simple report with only one column: A calculated column, calling for this formula with the value of 1000. As expected, the returned value was 500. But when I tried to use Total->Sum of this column, it failed. All the other options (Average, Count...) worked, except the sum.
As I mentioned in the beginning, this is just a test for my real situation.
Any ideas how it can be solved?

Hi
Other than the neat workaround suggested by Russ, if my memory serves me right that issue was fixed in the final release for 4.1 - 4.1.48
The patch to upgrade Discoverer 4.1 Admin and Desktop is 3201601, while for Plus and Viewer the patch is 3201610. These patches will upgrade you to 4.1.48.06. If you are using E-Business Suite the patch you need is 3451636 which is the upgrade to 4.1.48.08.
All of these patches are still available for download on Metalink.
For further information on the latest patches please look on my blog here: http://learndiscoverer.blogspot.com/2006/09/releases-and-patch-numbers-september.html
I'll be updating this again very soon with the latest information for other releases but for 4.1 my posting is accurate.
Best wishes
Michael

Different Unit of weight, Delivery KG and LB

Hi all,
we're working with a material master record within several countries. Managed and also used in Europe. So MARA-GEWEI is posted with KG, therefore the sales order and at the end the delivery refers to this weight unit.
Our US friends using a scale with weight unit LB and during packing they should update the HU weight using "VL02n". The scale couldn't be integrated (no it-interface), therefore the data will be entered manually and we expect a lot of missentered data.
Any idea how to change the weight unit in the sales order / delivery? Do we have to use an user exit during order creation implementing "UNIT_CONVERSION_SIMPLE" or is there any other solution?
The T006 is maintained with LB / KG, the User Own data were also checked ... forgotten anything?
Thanks and best regards,
Dirk

Thanks you for the quick answer.
However the alternative unit of measure is not our aim, we're looking for a different unit of weight.
The articles were ordered with unit of measure PC and we want to determine the right weight for the parcel, once with a scale in KG and once in LB (as it is regular unit of weight in US).
Regards,
Dirk

Forecast horizon values are not being considered in Total demand row

Hello Experts,
We are in SCM 4.1 Version.
I have a question regarding Forecast horizon consderation in Planning book.
We have a weekly data view In our Planning book,and in that planning data view "Total demand" row is not calculating correctly for the products with Forecast horizon .
The entire Forecast is counted in Total demand without considering forecast horizon value for that Product.
But this is working fine for Daily data view.
I have also noticed that, Total demand values are calculating correcly in weekly view ( Forecast horizon value from the Product master is taken into account ) only when the Forecast horizon value crossing that week bucket.(i.e >7 days).
But usually we will have a Forecast horizon value of 3 days for all our products,.
What should we do to get the Total demand values correctly?
Thanks in advance..
SAPLOUIS.
Edited by: saplouis on Dec 5, 2010 6:42 AM

Check the macros on data view
Regards
Aban

In the info bar at the bottom of the iphoto window, why is the number of items different from the total

In the info bar at the bottom of the iphoto screen, why is the number of items different from the total?

What version of iPhoto and system are you running? What mode are you in, i.e. Events, Photos?
If it's the Photos mode the number at the bottom will represent the number of photos displayed in that mode or the number of photos selected in that mode. The number will match the number next to the photos mode only when there are no photos in that mode that are selected.
If you click on the Events icon and then back on the photos icon the numbers should match.
OT

IS-Retail:how to maintain different unit of measures for a article

hi experts,
                can anyone tell me how we maintain different unit of measures for sales and purchasing for a article.base unit of measure,order unit,var unit.Hope for a good answer.
Regards

Hi,
Go to MM42, select basic data view
In,Units of measure/ EANs /dimensions sub tab
there u can see four radio buttons
B.Un    Unit of measure is base unit (used internally only)
O.Un    Unit of measure is the order unit                             - Purchasing
D/L.Un Unit of measure is delivery unit/issue unit              - Logistics
S.Un    Unit of measure is the sales unit                             - Sales
for eg:
First line enter EA (each) or PC (piece) in Auom for a material and enter 1 in Number and select radio button for B.Un
Second line enter CT (carton) in Auom and enter 10 in Number and select radio button for O.UN (when you creating a PO it UOB automatically picks as CT)
Third line enter PALin Auom and enter 50 in Number and select radio button for D/l .UN (when u creating a delivery UOB picks as PAL ie pallets)
Fourth line enter EA or PC and enter 1 in Number and select radio button for S.UN (when u creating a Sales order UOB picks as EA or PC as u defined)
Mohan

Different units in total sum row

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for