Dimension L2 showing up as member of itself

We are building a PAS cube from BW through a BEx query using the IMPORT SCHEMA command. One of the dimensions (CUSTOMER) is being built in PAS in such a way that the output members are being included as input members in their own tree.
For example, the CUSTOMER dimension should look like this (and it does appear this way in both BW and in the BEx query):
ALL CUSTOMERS
...19 - US Customers
..........16 - Target
..........17 - K-Mart
...21 - Foreign Customers         
..........18 - Wal-Mart
Instead, when it is imported into PAS it looks like :
ALL CUSTOMERS      
...19 - US Customers
..........19 - US Customers
..........16 - Target
..........17 - K-Mart
...21 - Foreign Customers
..........21 - Foreign Customers
..........18 - Wal-Mart
In looking at the short member names for the dimension in PAS, they appear like this :
ALL CUSTOMERS      
...L2 19
..........L1 19
..........L1 16          
..........L1 17
...L2 21         
..........L1 21         
..........L1 18        
The short names are different, which is why the dimension compiles without an error. 
Any ideas as to why each L2 is showing up as a member in its own tree as an input member?
Edited by: Laura Mikovsky on Jul 22, 2009 1:46 AM

Hi Laura,
Can you tell us if you are connecting to BW through BAPI? Or are you still using ODBO?
Please check if the configuration for your linkID in PAS is according to the following note:
[Enabling BAPI connections within Application Server|https://service.sap.com/sap/support/notes/1297726]
Best regards!
Ricardo Vieira

Similar Messages

  • MDX : How to use filter on a dimension without showing it OR merge 2 attributes of the same dimension?

    Hello everyone,
    I'm kind of newbie with MDX language, I'm trying to get filtered measures from a cube with a specific layout.
    Here is my exemple :
    I want to get all the "order numbers" where the "invoice" cost is more than 300.  Each invoice is linked with an ID, one order number can have several invoices.
    So what I do is a select request with 2 dimensions : "order num" and "id_invoice"
    Here is the result : I get all the cost sorted by "order num" and I can easealy identify those who are above 300
    order num
    Id_invoice
    cost
    Total
    Total2
    15450307
    10032013094498
    1671
    1737
    ok
    15450307
    10032013099835
    66
    1737
    KO
    15450596
    10032013094078
    8524
    8524
    ok
    15451214
    10032013094119
    228
    4348
    KO
    15451214
    10032013097069
    978
    4348
    ok
    15451214
    10032013097071
    3142
    4348
    ok
    15542434
    10032013101736
    142
    142
    KO
    15550064
    10032013097016
    1261
    1261
    ok
    15550346
    10032013097586
    2252
    2252
    ok
    15550353
    10032013098446
    2617
    2617
    ok
    What i need : In "cost", I need to have the sum of each cost which are above 300 in one line (without showing the invoice id)
    order num
    cost
    Total
    Total2
    15450307
    1671
    1737
    ok
    15450596
    8524
    8524
    ok
    15451214
    4120
    4348
    ok
    15550064
    1261
    1261
    ok
    15550346
    2252
    2252
    ok
    15550353
    2617
    2617
    ok
    How is it possible to use a filter on a dimension without showing it or merge 2 attributes of the same dimension ?
    The problem is that if I show "id" column, the filter doesn't work properly : it compares 300 with the total cost of the whole order and does not compare with each invoice (which could be under 300 ! - see "KO" in Total2 column)
    Here is the request I use to generate this result :
    with
    member [Measures].[Total]
    as (
    [TP].[ID INVOICE].[All],
    [TP].[ORDER NUM].currentmember,
    [Measures].[COST]
    member [Measures].[Total2]
    as (
    IIF([Measures].[COST] >
    300, "ok",
    "KO")
    select
    {[Measures].[COST],[Measures].[Total],[Measures].[Total2]}
    on
    columns,           
    Filter
                 [TP].[ORDER NUM].[ORDER
    NUM].members *
                 [TP].[ID INVOICE].[ID
    INVOICE].members
                 ,[Measures].[COST]
    > 0
    on
    rows
    FROM [MYCUBE]
    Thank you  for your help !
    Kind regards,
    Olivier.

    Hi Olivier,
    hereunder a similar query against the AW. For all order numbers, we sum all lines above 30 without diplaying the line numbers:
    WITH
    MEMBER [Measures].[lines above 30] AS
    IIF(
    [Measures].[Internet Sales Amount] > 30,
    [Measures].[Internet Sales Amount],
    null
    MEMBER [Measures].[aggr lines above 30] AS
    SUM(
    exists(
    [Internet Sales Order Details].[Sales Order Line].[Sales Order Line],
    [Internet Sales Order Details].[Sales Order Number].currentmember
    [Measures].[lines above 30]
    SELECT
    [Measures].[Internet Sales Amount],
    [Measures].[aggr lines above 30]
    } ON 0,
    [Internet Sales Order Details].[Sales Order Number].[Sales Order Number] ON 1
    FROM ( SELECT
    [Product].[Category].[All Products] ON 0,
    [Internet Sales Order Details].[Sales Order Number].&[SO51177]:
    [Internet Sales Order Details].[Sales Order Number].&[SO51178]
    } ON 1
    FROM [Adventure Works] )
    I reduced the cube with a subselect.
    Philip,

  • How can I modify Time dimension to create a Top member above year members ?

    Hi experts,
    I would like to modify Time dimension to add a Top member above year members.
    I already did a test:
    I added a member in Time dimension which is the parent of all year members. I granted it these property values:
    - ID = TOTAL
    - EVDESCRIPTION = Total
    - LEVEL = TOTAL
    - HLEVEL = 1 (and I added 1 to all the other members)
    - TIMEID = 10000001
    All other properties were left blank for this member.
    I processed the dimension. It went well. But when I tried an evdre in BPC excel it failed.
    Any idea of something missing ?
    I am working on SAP BPC MS 7 SP4
    Thanks for your help
    Ludovic

    Hi Petar,
    Thanks for your answer. No doubt that we could solve the issue using on of the way you suggested.
    However, even though I had the evdre issue right after applying time dimension modifications, it occurs that the evdre issue was not due to time dimension modifications. I tested it better and I can tell that using "total" as a level works.
    Best regards,
    Ludovic

  • BW 3.5: DataSource Overview shows nothing for BW system itself!

    BW 3.5: RSA1 -> Select Source Systems, then pick BW system itself in the right pane, right click and pick DataSource Overview (note: we've got many exported datasources or data marts and replicated the datasources already to the BW system itself), then a small window pops up saying that "There is no application component hierarchy in BW for source system &1.  Load application component hierarchy from the source system now?" with Yes and No button.  I click Yes, then another frame shows up at the righthand side with a folder called "BW Development system BW client 100(the client name)", expend the folder, nothing under the folder!
    The DataSource Overview work for other source systems like R3 and EBP, but don't know why nothing shows up under the system itself!  We do have many data mart in the InfoSource view and we have replicated the datasources many times, still get nothing when conducting the DataSource Overview. 
    Welcome to every BW expert inputs!

    hi Kevin,
    think application component hierarchy for bw myself not transfered yet, try rsa9 (transfer application hierarchy component) ?

  • My macbookpro shows as a device on itself in finder - why and how do I get rid of it  Thanks!!

    Hello all.
    My macbookpro shows as a device on itself in finder - I'd like to know why or at the very least how to get rid of it.  Thank you!!

    Thank you!!  I was afraid something had happened because I am running Windows via VMWare and that somehow wires had gotten crossed.  I was leery of trying to get rid of it in case it was actually a duplication of something.  Thanks again!!

  • Account Dimension not showing all members in the cube in Analysis Services

    Hi,        
             In SAP - BPC 5.1 after processing account dimension all the members are created under account dimension in analysis services but the same cannot be found in the data cube. Hence the reports generated through SAP - BPC is not showing all the members.
             The issue looks very strange as we can see the members getting created but the same is not getting populated in the cubes. I am not able to visualize what exacly the issue is? Is it with the application or with the analysis services?
    Thanks
    Sharath

    Your sixth sense is correct, there is definitely support in MSAS and BPC 5.1 for multiple hierarchies in the account dimension.
    I'm also referring to parentH1 and parentH2, but perhaps we're still speaking of different things.
    In the past, I faced a very similar problem as you, and the root cause was because I had one member, let's call it FancyParent, which, in H1, had children Child1 and Child2.
    But in H2 it had children Child1, Child2 and Child3. I forget now if that was how I wanted the setup to be, or if it was a mistake on my part, but either way, MSAS doesn't allow this. The admin consol didn't complain when processing the dimension -- this was in Outlooksoft 5.0; perhaps validation has improved now.
    But the cube was completely unworkable. Certain things were calculating correctly, but everything in the account dimension in the area around FancyParent (above and below it, in both hierarchies) was quite unpredictable.
    By disabling first one, and then the other, of the two hierarchies, and disabling blocks of accounts, I was eventually able to pinpoint the problem. But it took days to figure out what was the problem. (The account dimension had 2500 members and 4 hierarchies, and it was not a pretty sight.)
    A parent must have the same definition of children in all hierarchies. It can't, as another example, have children in H1, and be a base member in H2. Each member can have different parents in the two hierarchies, but must always have the same children in both.
    To work around this problem, I had to create two separate accounts NetIncomeH1 and NetIncomeH2 (and PretaxIncomeH1, PretaxIncomH2, etc. all the way down to the point where they branched off), to get the two separate aggregations of the P&L in the two hierarchies. Once I did that, it made sense to me why, but I also swore off on frivolous extra hierarchies ever again.

  • Family Sharing- Photos not showing from 1 member

    We have 3 members in family sharing. The organizer, a parent/guardian, and a child. The child account was added the past 2 days. When the child member posts a photo to the family album, the organizer sees the photo, but the parent/guardian does not on either her iPhone or iPad. If the child account adds an event to the family calendar all members see the event on all devices. Photos posted by the organizer show up in the family album for the parent/guardian. It seems the problem lies only with the parent/guardian seeing the photos posted by the child.
    The parent/guardian iPad is running iOS 8.2 and rebooted. Her iPhone is running iOS 7.1.2 due to lack of space restricting software updates.
    Any ideas?

    Parent/guardian should try to sign out of icloud and itunes and restart device and sign back in. If that does not help I would actually try to restore one of the devices and setup as new. If that does not work, I would contact apple to check server side.

  • Dimension Maintanence showing error in awm112030_Standalone  version

    I am using awm112030_Standalone .
    When i am going to maintain a dimension, it's showing below error.
    INI: error creating a definition manager, Generic at TxsOqConnection::generic<BuildProcess>INI: XOQ-00703: error executing OLAP DML command "(SYS.AWXML!R11_LOAD_DIM_FINISH('FIN_MGMT_PROD_SUB_CAT_DIM.DIMENSION' 'YES') : ORA-00600: internal error code, arguments: [CRESET02], [], [], [], [], [], [], [], [], [], [], []
    ORA-00600: internal error code, arguments: [CRESET.EMPTY01], [], [], [], [], [], [], [], [], [], [], []
    )", Generic at TxsOqAWManager::evaluateExpression
    Thanks,
    Pallab Mandal

    Pallab,
    Please file an SR on this problem so that we can help you directly.
    David

  • Image Dimensions not showing

    This MAY be a Photoshop CS3 issue, so forgive me if it is, but I can no longer see image dimensions in the (Leopard) finder. The problem seems to have started when I upgraded to Photoshop CS3, but I upgraded to Leopard just a few days prior to the CS3 upgrade. If I look at images that were already on my hard drive before Leopard, the dimensions appear. Any new images I save via Photoshop no longer have dimensions appearing in the finder preview area.
    Edit: This definitely appears to be a Leopard issue. It appears that ALL new images, no matter which program saved it, do not have dimensions attached. I opened a jpeg with Preview and saved it as both a jpeg and a png, and no dimensions appeared.

    I was doing a lot of graphics stuff the other day, for many hours, and noticed that the things I had just saved were not showing the pixel dimensions in the Finder. For me simply selecting the image in the Finder caused the dimensions to appear. You might also try a restart, then open a folder with the new images and see if the dimensions are now present. Also had a bizarre result in Cover Flow where several newly created images all displayed as being exactly the same (all looked like the first image created). In that case a force restart of the Finder brought things back to sanity.
    Francine
    Francine
    Schwieder

  • Concatenate measure and dimension field shows not enough memory available

    Hello, I need to concatenate a measure and dimension, for dummy test I did  Cstr([Measures].[MeasureName]) + "dummy string, (unit of measure required here)"
    but this generate an error, please see image for required measure. 
    Executing the query ...
    Server: The operation has been cancelled because there is not enough memory available for the application. If using a 32-bit version of the product, consider upgrading to the 64-bit version or increasing the amount of memory available on the machine.
    Execution complete
    MDX Query:
    WITH 
    MEMBER [Measures].[Cant Fact Umv2] 
    AS Cstr([Measures].[Cant Fact Umv]) + "dummy string, (unit of measure required here)"
     SELECT 
     NON EMPTY { [Measures].[Cant Fact Umv], [Measures].[Cant Fact Umv2] } ON COLUMNS, 
     NON EMPTY { 
    ([Categoria Materiales].[Categoria Material].[Categoria Material].ALLMEMBERS * 
    [Productos].[Producto].[Producto].ALLMEMBERS * 
    [Ventas Analisis].[UM Venta].[UM Venta].ALLMEMBERS ) } 
     DIMENSION PROPERTIES MEMBER_CAPTION, MEMBER_UNIQUE_NAME ON ROWS FROM  [Ventas Analisis 2] CELL PROPERTIES VALUE, BACK_COLOR, FORE_COLOR, FORMATTED_VALUE, FORMAT_STRING, FONT_NAME, FONT_SIZE, FONT_FLAGS

    Why cant this be done at the presentation? why should you do it in MDX?
    Please Mark This As Answer if it solved your issue
    Please Vote This As Helpful if it helps to solve your issue
    Visakh
    My Wiki User Page
    My MSDN Page
    My Personal Blog
    My Facebook Page

  • Dimension build rule file (Sort member)

    I am loading sorted data for one of the dimension. But its is not coming in sorted fashion in outline. New member which i am adding is always coming in The end.Even though that member is in sorted format in the file.
    I am using generation method . I am putting member for only generation 2 and its alias.I tried using ascending option but it is giving me error
    Can any body help me with this

    As Glenn said, the build only builds new members. In order to have FULL control over the order of a resultant dimension's order, you need to blank out the dimension first and then build via the load rule. As Glenn mentioned, you can do "incremental dimension building". You can do this directly in EAS in an interactive manner by using outline/update outline in pull downs. Just do not save the outline until all your changes are done. You can also accomplish incremental builds via Esscmd or via MaxL, but I'll assume for right now you are still testing. The advantages of the incremental changes is that you can do a number of changes before Essbase commits to doing a restructure, which is time consuming, not to mention confusing if you are "deleting" (however temporary) the entire dimension's hierarchy.
    Regarding setting ascending order
    1) in the load rule's Dimension Build Settings prompt
    2) Select Dimension Build Settings tab
    3) highlight the dimension you are changing
    4) select Ascending for sort order
    This should work...I've never had it error out. However, I will say that it sorts the entire dimension...not just the siblings of a new member. Your upper level members will move as well. Because of this, the ascending sort in a load rule is undesirable. Give it a try. If you don't like the results, just don't save the outline.
    Kevin

  • UCCE CTIOS supervisor not showing the team member

    Hello,all. We have ICM 8.0(2) duplex environment. The CTIOS supervisor toolkit is not showing the most updated team member information. It's still showing the old team member who was removed already and not showing the newly added ones. Do we need to restart the CTIOS server when we change the team assignments? The webview report is showing the correct information though.
    Thanks.

    Hello,
        I have seen this happen before.  lookup how to execure an OPC exit (this will cause a temp outage in your contact center)....  This will resync the team's..
    It should just work normally however
    Chad

  • Difference between values of a single dimension is showing wrong data

    Hi ,
    I have a analysis , where I am displaying total revenue measure (in row) of all products agianst quaters dimension , scenario dimension (in col) . Scenario have two values - actual , budget ; variance (actual - budget) , I added by creating a calculated Item on Scenario column . Now the report looks like this :
    for Q1 : -
    revenue - > actual (523,263,250) budget (2,072,963,575,593) variance (- 496,053,029,268)
    But ,the figure of variance is showing incorrect value , it should be , - 2,072,440,312,343 .
    I tried sum , avg etc calculations ...all are coming in wrong figures ...
    Anything I am missing ?
    OBIEE version : 11.1.1.5
    data source essbase : 11.1.2

    Is that same behavior when you create a new column for variance in RPD?

  • How to show a Account member (date type) in reports??

    Hi,
    I have a Account member of date type.
    but when I am using that member in reports it is not showing me the date that I have entered in planning web form.
    I have the same member in planning web form and it is showing me proper date.
    Eg: 19/Dec/1985 is showing as 19851219 in report.
    How to display it in proper date format???
    Thanks,
    Sourabh

    I think you might be using Essbase database connection in reports where dates are stored as numbers. You probably need to use Planning database connection on your reports to make date data type show up correctly.

  • Duplicate members to be showed as shared member

    Hi all,
    working on ver11.1.1.3.X,i tried to build dimensions through rules file but some duplicate members are there in the .dim file. I have build the primary member hierarchy first and later tried to build the member hierarchy having duplicates,when i loaded the duplicate member hierarchy the members in primary member hierarchy were automatically deleted.
    I'm using Level reference for dimesion building. The duplicates in the second member hierarchy should be shown as shared members,
    can any one tell me how to make the duplicate members as shared with level reference?
    thanks in advance

    Hi gurus,
    I'm building two members of a dimension hierarchy through rule files, i have two .dim files in level reference format so i created two rule files.The problem is during defining the dimension build properties because some of the members in the second member hierarchy have to be defined as shared members.
    Let say i have a dim A and the members are B & C. I need to load B.dim,C.dim files by using level reference method through B1.rul,C1.rul files. C.dim has some  duplicate members of B.dim which are to be defined as shared members of C member.
    The duplicate members are at different levels(in B at Levl2 and in C at Levo- these Lev0 duplicate members have to be shared ).Please help me out in defining the dim build properties,
    thanks in advance
    Edited by: kailash on Jan 4, 2012 11:27 AM

Maybe you are looking for