Disable sound for specific users

How do I disable sound for specific users?

Theoretically if the user's not in the audio group, he shouldn't have access to sound devices.
$ ll /dev/snd/
total 0
drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 80 Oct 2 19:30 by-path
crw-rw----+ 1 root audio 116, 2 Oct 2 19:30 controlC0
crw-rw----+ 1 root audio 116, 8 Oct 2 19:30 controlC1
crw-rw----+ 1 root audio 116, 7 Oct 2 19:30 hwC0D0
crw-rw----+ 1 root audio 116, 13 Oct 2 19:30 hwC1D0
crw-rw----+ 1 root audio 116, 14 Oct 2 19:30 hwC1D1
crw-rw----+ 1 root audio 116, 15 Oct 2 19:30 hwC1D2
crw-rw----+ 1 root audio 116, 16 Oct 2 19:30 hwC1D3
crw-rw----+ 1 root audio 116, 4 Oct 4 09:12 pcmC0D0c
crw-rw----+ 1 root audio 116, 3 Oct 4 10:13 pcmC0D0p
crw-rw----+ 1 root audio 116, 5 Oct 2 19:30 pcmC0D1p
crw-rw----+ 1 root audio 116, 6 Oct 2 19:30 pcmC0D2c
crw-rw----+ 1 root audio 116, 9 Oct 2 19:30 pcmC1D3p
crw-rw----+ 1 root audio 116, 10 Oct 2 19:30 pcmC1D7p
crw-rw----+ 1 root audio 116, 11 Oct 2 19:30 pcmC1D8p
crw-rw----+ 1 root audio 116, 12 Oct 2 19:30 pcmC1D9p
crw-rw----+ 1 root audio 116, 1 Oct 2 19:30 seq
crw-rw----+ 1 root audio 116, 33 Oct 2 19:30 timer

Similar Messages

IN OBIEE, how to disable drilldown for specific users

How to disable drilldown action in a hierarchy as manager,lead,reporter.
in this scenario i need to disable hierarchy for the specified reporter and the upper two peoples will have that functionality
Awaiting ur reply
Bala

The RPD hierarchies themselves have no security attributes on them. So your left with a workaround or two. First one that springs to mind :
Create the report in question save this as 'Manager' report.
Create the report in question, disable drilling on the column in question, save this as 'Reporter' report.
Deploy both reports to the dashboard in seperate sections and use the section permissions (against the Webgroups those users exist in) to determine which section is displayed to which user.
Maybe more options will come up from other users, but this one is a start.
Hope this helps,
Alastair

Disable upload for specific users only

Hi,
I'm wondering if anyone else has found a need or solution to my problem.
I have a lot of users connecting to a FCS instance, many who should not be able to upload any content, just manipulate or otherwise interact with existing content. I've found that I can simply forbid access to all devices for a particular permission set, but that still allows users to "try" to upload, and is confusing. Further, it seems to hinder the duplicate functionality, which is desired in this use case.
Any thoughts? I'm running clean out of ideas here!
Thanks,
- James Heliker
[email protected]

John explained through an email to use the "browser" group - which essentially sets a trait permission (upload = forbid) for a specific user/set of users. However, this does not seem to change anything, as far as being able to upload a file.
I can't use the actual browser group as I have many other requirements also, but setting this trait permission on my existing groups does absolutely nothing as far as I can tell. Has anyone else dealt with this issue directly?
Thanks!
- James Heliker
[email protected]

Disable automapping for specific users

Hello All,
I have a DL which contains the users list and i have to remove automapping feature for them.
we have more than 3 sharedmailbox and 50+ users per sharedmailbox to disable this feature so i can't do it manually.
Can someone please help me with the powershell script which gets input from text file which contains username? Thanks in Advance
Regards,
Mac

Thanks Amit. Now i ran the whole script and getting the same error.
User or group "Userlogonname
" wasn't found. Please make sure you've typed it
correctly.
+ CategoryInfo : InvalidData: (:) [Add-MailboxPermission],
ManagementObjectNotFoundException
+ FullyQualifiedErrorId : FAC24C45,Microsoft.Exchange.Management.RecipientTasks.AddMailboxPermission
I'm very sure my sharedmailbox name is correct and as well the logon name in text file because when i ran the below script manually it get successful.
Add-MailboxPermission "India Mail" -User macman -AccessRights:FullAccess -AutoMapping $false

Disable release flag in service entry sheet for specific users

How can we disable the release flag for specific user/s in Service Entry Sheet(ML81N)?
Can any one suggest?
arjman

Hi dear,
In the ML81N T code, there is an object M_EINK_FRG Release code and code grp.
leave it empty. and assign the Role to the user with whoom you dont want to release the SES.
In this process the system will show you the green flag and also allow you to release the SES but when you will save it the system will give an Error Message about the Authorization.
this will not allow the user to release the SES.
Hope it Helps,
Regards,
Yawar Khan
Edited by: 1234_abcd on Jan 21, 2011 12:40 PM

Disable DSN for specific messages

Hi,
i have a problem, where i wish to disable DSN for specific internal users.
Scenario :
Interal User a sends a mail to special address c,
if mail host of special address c is not available or anything else i wish that internal user a is never informed that c didnt recieve his mail.
Can this be done ?
i thought about doing this with sieve.. but i dont know if DSNs generated by the IMS Master itself are also checked by sieve mechanism....

Please do notice that your bits do not support many of the features you want. And that later bits do. If you offer that to your company, perhaps you could update more often, or at least this time. We're not talking about a new package, here, but just an update to the one you have, that's not doing the job properly.
Also, if you had asked for what you needed at the beginning, I could have helped you better.
What you want is the sieve command, save-copy, or, perhaps monitor. Please see whitepaper, quoted below:
Saving Messages for Document Retention
If the reason you want to capture a copy of the message is for document retention, then you will want to take advantage of the new "capture" sieve action. You have to have iMS v5.2 or better to use this facility. The capture action can only be specified in a system or channel sieve; it is not available in user sieves. The general syntax is
capture "monitoraddress"
The monitor action is the same as the capture action. Users are encouraged to use the 'capture' instead of monitor as it best reflects the function being performed.
This action sends a DSN containing the original message in its entirety to the specified capture address. Since this is a DSN it is effectively a completely separate message so there's little chance of it causing side effects that will alert anyone to the monitoring. In particular, no addresses from the original message appear in the DSN header so there's very little chance of the capture copy getting forwarded to the wrong person by mistake. And even though the original message is encapsulated, it is a MIME encapsulation which means the content is easily accessible in any MIME-compliant user agent.
The capture action is nonstandard and undocumented. It was originally intended to be part of the habanero release, but the backporting of direct LDAP support to 5.2 means it is available in 5.2 as well. We certainly intend to support it in the future.
Saving Messages for Replay
There is an undocumented functionality in iMS for making a copy of messages for archival purposes. It's intended for saving sent messages in the event that they need to be replayed. We did this for folks who send mail via bad links to places where the mail may be received OK by an intermediate host but then subsequently lost on its way to the final destination.
This is done with the MESSAGE-SAVE-COPY mapping table. Entries in that table have the form
MESSAGE-SAVE-COPY
out-channel|from-address|D|msg-filename result
where
out-channel -- name of the channel the message is flowing out
from-address -- originator's address (envelope From: address)
D -- the letter "D" (stands for "dequeue" )
msg-filename -- name of the message file being dequeued.
result -- where to rename the file
Outbound Traffic
To save only messages out to the Internet, do
MESSAGE-SAVE-COPY
tcp_local|*|D|/instance-root/queue/tcp_local/*/* (tab-or-space)$Y/msg_save/$1/$2
Be aware that the archive isn't made until the message is actually dequeued from iMS (i.e., sent successfully or bounced). A rename operation is done (as opposed to a copy operation). As such, the message file has to remain on the same disk that the IMTA_QUEUE lives on.
Inbound Traffic
To capture inbound mail will want to have good control of what machines/pathways a message will take on its way into your systems. If your setup is such that mail always enters the site via an INBOUND relay and leaves the site via know outbound gateways, then inbound message flow is from INBOUND-MTA --> MsgStore machine.
Since you can have multiple MsgStore machines behind any one INBOUND-MTA, you will want to make configuration on the INBOUND-MTA machine such that it will use a dedicated queue to talk to the MsgStore machines. For instance, on the INBOUND-MTA machine, you could setup a rewrite rule in your imta.cnf file for MsgStore-A, MsgStore-B, ... MsgStore-Z like:
Node-A.store.domain.com.au $U%$D@tcp_to_store-daemon
Node-Z.store.domain.com.au $U%$D@tcp_to_store-daemon
and a corresponding 'tcp_to_store' channel which looks like:
! tcp_to_store
tcp_to_store smtp mx single_sys subdirs 20 noreverse maxjobs 7 \
pool SMTP_POOL maytlsserver allowswitchchannel \
saslswitchchannel tcp_auth
tcp_to_store-daemon
This has the effect of routing all mail to any of your MsgStore machines through tcp_to_store channel. Transactions to other machines in your setup will take the tcp_intranet channel.
With this in place you can then throw in a MSG-SAVE-COPY mapping table which reads:
MESSAGE-SAVE-COPY
*|*|D|/instance-root/imta/queue/tcp_to_store/*/* $Y/msg_save/tcp_to_store/$2/$3
the net effect will be a number of queue files in the /msg_save/tcp_to_store directory which are ready for replay. Note the $2 in the sample represents the subdir that the message was already in. As such if you have 'subdirs 20' on your tcp_to_store channel, you will want to precreate the /msg_save/tcp_to_save/000 thru 019 subdirectories with the appropriate ownership and permissions.
To initiate the replay, you want to simply move the /msg_save/tcp_to_store/### directories to the /instance-root/imta/queue/reprocess and issue the command 'imsimta cache -synch'. The MTA will start pushing out those messages to the store(s).
If you want to have multiple replays happening you can kick off parallel runs of the reprocess channel by doing 'imsimta run reprocess &' a number of times.
And, If you want to segregate the storage for each MsgStore machine, you can make new channel in addition to the one suggested 'tcp_to_store' channel. You would then have groups of rewrite rules directing traffic over those channels or you could have one rewrite rule per channel block that you setup. That way you can have distinct entries in your MSG-SAVE-COPY mapping table.
Finally, since there is a rename operation taking place when you use the MSG-SAVE-COPY mapping table, you will want to make sure that at the first pass that /msg_save is on the same device that your queues live on.
Short Term Arvchival
You could setup a process in cron to move those files to a new device on a periodic basis. Better yet, schedule this via the job_controller. For instance, these lines at the top of your job_controller.cnf file:
[PERIODIC_JOB=archive_mover]
command=/usr/iplanet/sitescripts/arc_mover.sh
time=/00:10
will run the arc_mover.sh script for you every 10 minutes. Your arc_mover.sh could look something like:
#!/bin/ksh
# ***Script is untested - should generate some ideas though****
DUMMY=`test -d /var/tmp/timestamp.dir || mkdir -p /var/tmp/timestamp.dir`
cd /msg_save
# First pass
for dir in `find ./ -type d`
do
DUMMY=`test -d /real/storage/area/$dir || mkdir -p /real/storage/area/$dir`
cd $dir
for msgfile in `find ./ -type f -newer /var/tmp/timestamp.dir -name "*.00"`
do
mv $msgfile /real/storage/area/$dir/
done
cd /msg_save
done
touch /var/tmp/timestamp.dir
# Second pass cause we do not know how long we took.
for dir in `find ./ -type d`
do
DUMMY=`test -d /real/storage/area/$dir || mkdir -p /real/storage/area/$dir`
cd $dir
for msgfile in `find ./ -type f -newer /var/tmp/timestamp.dir -name "00"`
do
mv $msgfile /real/storage/area/$dir/
done
cd /msg_save
done
exit

How to apply Software Restriction policy for specific user in local group policy object ?

I am working on implementing user based software restriction policy programmatically for local group policy object.
If i create a policy through Domain Controller,i do have option for software restriction policy in user configuration but in local group policy editor i don't have option for that.
When i look for the changes made by policy applied from Domain Controller in registry, they modifies registry values for specific users on path HKEY_USERS\(SID of User)\Softwares\Policies\Microsoft\Windows\Safer\Codeidentifiers
They also have registry.pol stored in SYSvol folder in Domain Controller. When i make the same changes in registry to block any other application, application is getting blocked.
I achieved what i wanted but is it right to modify registry values ?
PS:- I am using Igrouppolicyobject API

I achieved what I wanted but is it right to modify registry values ?
You also can modify a registry programmatically based policy. Check this:
http://blogs.msdn.com/b/dsadsi/archive/2009/07/23/working-with-group-policy-objects-programmatically-simple-c-example-illustrating-how-to-modify-a-registry-based-policy.aspx
We are trying to better understand customer views on social support experience, so your participation in this interview project would be greatly appreciated if you have time. Thanks for helping make community forums a great place.
Click
HERE to participate the survey.

Disable Statistics for specific Tables

Is it possible to disable statistics for specific tables???

If you want to stop gathering statistics for certain tables, you would simply not call DBMS_STATS.GATHER_TABLE_STATS on those particular tables (I'm assuming that is how you are gathering statistics at the moment). The old statistics will remain around for the CBO, but they won't be updated. Is that really what you want?
If you are currently using GATHER_SCHEMA_STATS to gather statistics, you would have to convert to calling GATHER_TABLE_STATS on each table. You'll probably want to have a table set up that lists what tables to exclude and use that in the procedure that calls GATHER_TABLE_STATS.
Justin
Distributed Database Consulting, Inc.
http://www.ddbcinc.com/askDDBC

Find Label Missing in Advanced Search For Specific User

for specifi users FIND label is showing but some of the users in advanced search this find label is missing . top of the applictaion it is there
plz let me know why this is problem is coming
find button should visible to all users......................
give me repaly ASAP

Hi
CRM 5.0
its not related to application,modification ..but my problem is the find label is working for some of the users.but some of the users find label is not there,
plz let me know where i have to make corrections for this problem........

SNR License Issue. How Can I Disable SNR for all Users?

Hi,
I Have an issue with SNR on CUCM 10.5 and with assignement of license type
I have a cluster with 400 users.
200 users use ip phone 3905 and should be use an Essential License.
When system check for assignement of license type , itassign a Basic License instead of an Essential License, because it see that users have SNR Enabled.
All users in my system have SNR enabled, and I can not disable it. All my user have Enable Mobility unchecked, and all my phone have Device Mobility Off, but system however see SNR enable.
How can i disable SNR for all users? This is a feature that client don't need.
I dont' have a sufficent number of licenses for support all 3905 in Basic License.
thanks for help.
Andrea

Well actually, Mobile Identity wouldn't apply to a 3905 unless those phones had another line on a Dual-Mode device like an iPhone or Android phone. So unless you have either of those in your system you can scratch that idea. Someone else may chime in here and try to help a bit more as RD/RDP are the main SNR culprits.

Data Level security for specific Users

Hi,
Can you please suggest some ideas on by-passing the Data Level security for specific users or specific group?
Currently, we have data level security defined on a group permissions for one group and for people belonging to another group, the security should not apply and they should see entire data.
But, key thing here is that, the user belongs to both the groups.
Any ideas helps.
Thanks,
Chandu.

So you are saying you want a user to belong to a group with data-level security filters, but you don't want the filters to apply to that user?
Why are they in the group then?
Are the data filter defined with variables or are the hard-coded?
If variables, you may be able to put logic in initialization block to set the variable appropriately for specific users.
I'd rethink the security model - when I define data level security filters, I tend to force users to only belong to a single group/role.

Password protect/disable printers for certain users under ML 10.8

I am looking for a solution to prevent my youger pupils to print everything without asking me. Is there a solution to protect/disable printers for certain users under ML 10.8 ?

Ok. The sharing interface is not robust enough (by itself) to password challenge print jobs. You may need to look at another printing technology known as CUPS. Apple created this for advanced print configuration, and it does offer Kerberos security with printing password challenges. I do not know if OS X server offers more granularity in configuration.
I won't be able to help you with the following as I do not use the CUPS printing solution here.
In Safari, type in the following and press return.
localhost:631
You will see a tabbed browser interface. And a bit of light reading ...

Disabling dropbox for certain users?

is there a way I can disable dropbox for one user and allow it for other user on the same machine, and if yes, how?
thank you
Last edited by pootzko (2008-09-30 20:20:20)

http://forums.getdropbox.com/topic.php? … post-22888

Hide settings icon for specific users

Hi
In share point 2013 we have settings icon at top right corner.
Is there any way, I can hide this icon for specific users.
Please help in this regard.
Thanks,
Anil

Hi Kumar,
Its possible.
1.Open the .master page in some textpad/SP Designer.
2.Look for below tag. This is the holder for SITE ACTIONS
<SharePoint:SiteActions
3.Look for the Menu item templates. These will clearly give you an idea on wht they will hold.
<SharePoint:MenuItemTemplate
4.There will be 2 attributes for each menu item called
PermissionsString & PermissionMode.
In the permission string give the required permission to the user to be shown or hide.
http://sharepoint.stackexchange.com/questions/66628/edit-settings-gear-icon
Please remember to click 'Mark as Answer' on the answer if it helps you

Hiding P0002-PERID for specific users

Does anyone know how to hide the social security number field field for specific users? We are trying to hide it both at the header level and detail level of IT 0002.
Thanks

Jeff,
Follow this link http://www.*********************/hr_security/hr_security.htm, otherwise request your SAP Security person/team.
Thanks,
Kiran.

Disable sound for specific users

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for