Elements workflow to iPhoto-best practice?

I'm helping a client move from her Windows 7/Elements environment to Lion. The catalog moved nicely.
The objective is to take a portion of her Elements photos to iPhoto in order to have it synch with her iPhone and iPad.
I'm not too familar with Elements. It seems to me that the only way to accomplish this is to open the pictures in editor and export them as jpeg. I would have thought there is a way to export copies of discrete items in the catalog.
Any suggestions?
Thanks

If using the Organizer you can cmd+click discrete items and choose File à Export As New
It’s best not to duplicate items in Organizer and iPhoto; so one or the other should be used.
It is possible to set up iPhoto with Elements as the external editor but if your client is familiar with Organizer from the windows Pc may want to stick with it.
http://kb2.adobe.com/cps/403/kb403605.html#main_Import_images_from_an_iPhoto__11_catalog_i nto_Photoshop_Elements

Similar Messages

Workflow history report best practice

Hi.
How do you recommend to make custom workflow history report(s)?
For example, let's think of the most simple document approval process: initiator uploaded document, manager reviews the document, if approved - document is marked as approved, if not - document should be modified by initiator. In real life
review can be done by group, business flow will be much more complicated, some tasks will be assigned to other users, etc.
Now, I need to show feedback received from users in a short, readable format. Let's say we need to know:
1) when review was made
2) who made it (name, position, email)
3) review outcome (approved/rejected/custom)
4) review comment
So, nothing unusual here.
I see the following options:
Make a view from different sources: workflow history list, workflow tasks list, current library. For me it sounds crazy.
Write necessary data into workflow history list and don't write there anything else. This option doesn't support multiple reports.
Write all data into workflow history list and then somehow filter its data. Again sounds crazy.
Write data into custom SharePoint list and then make views based on it. Looks flexible. But, probably, every workflow will need separated list.
Write data into external SQL database, then somehow show in SharePoint. The most flexible, can store practically any amount of data, apply any kind of transformation. But data is not in SharePoint directly, some data connection/sync issues might
occur.
What will you recommend?
BTW, there is additional question: all this logging creates so much "noise" in workflow diagram - I write some information on regular basis after some events and that requires adding multiple activities every time: set workflow status, update
item (set some custom status), write workflow history and write into some external data store. 3-4 repeating events - how can I "group" them into something like 1 activity?

Hi,
I would suggest you use the custom list option.
With SharePoint OOTB List, we can take use of the available features provided to manage data conveniently.
Also, as a data source, we can also generate different kinds of reports from SharePoint List using other reporting products such as Excel.
For the second question, I would suggest you open a single thread for it to let others in this forum easier to focus on one question in one single thread.
Feel free to reply if there are still any questions.
Best regards
Patrick Liang
TechNet Community Support

Picasa and iPhoto best practices

I have read many a post on the difficulties between these two programs and I understand it is like comparing apples to oranges.
However, having said all that, what about some advice for the stubborn ones among us. Here are my questions:
1. How do I set up iPhoto 11 to work with Picasa?
2. What tool can i use to monitor folders for changes like what Picasa does?
3. How can i delete a photo in iPhoto and know it is gone for good (such as an ex wife).
4. How do I create an online disaster recovery plan so that if I lose my data, I do not lose my photos?
5. How can I avoid duplicates?
6. How can I ensure that If I download a photo from email or online that it gets into iPhoto and Picasa simultaneously?
7. How can I use my existing folder structure from within iPhoto?
8. What other tips and tricks am I missing?
Thank you to all the experts in advance...

2. Where or what would I search for to find the google hack (if i wanted)
You don't search. It's built in to Picasa.
3. Yes, I want the existing file structure to be recreated in iPhoto. If I go the iPhoto route, I want to recreate what I have already done in finder that has taken me months.
If you want to duplicate your Folder Tree in iPhoto:
Start at the bottom of the hierarchy and drag a folder of images to the Album Heading in iPhoto. The pics will be imported and an Album of the same name created.
You can then create the Enclosing Folders in the iPhoto Window (File -> New Folder) and drag the Album to it. Folders can contain other Folders (Nested Folders) and Albums.
However, is your folder system date based? Then this form of organisation is a bit pointless in iPhoto when Smart Albums or the Calendar tool (Click on the wee magnifying glass in the Search Box) mean you can find the photos taken on any day, month or year at a click. With Smart Albums it's easy to find photos from specific range - say, June 3 to August 25, 2009 etc.
If your folder system is theme based - Xmas pics, Birthday pics etc, then you'll find Keywords are much more flexible, and can be used in conjunction with other criteria for making Smart Albums and searches.
4. If I have copy files unchecked in preferences, and I delete iPhoto trash, will that delete it from finder?
No. iPhoto will not delete any file outside its own Library.
5. Because I had the copy files unchecked, is it best to start again with that preference checked and do an import if I go the iPhoto route?
Yes. Up to iPhoto 09 you could use an App called AliasHerder, to convert to the Managed Library but that hasn't been updated for iPhoto 11 yet.
Some other comment son iPhoto v Picasa:
1. iPhoto is integrated throughout the OS and is available in every Open... or Attach... dialogue in the OS.
2. iPhoto is colour managed.
3. iPhoto can integrate with a wide range of online sharing sites.
4. iPhoto has Keepsakes: books, calendar and so on
Finally, and this may or may not be important to you, but when you install Picasa you accept an End User licence that allows Google to update the application when it wants to, with no further recourse to you. Should there be a problem with an update, as can happen to any software developer from time to time, you have no way of refusing that update.
Regards
TD

2nd Mac - best practices using iPhoto on both?

Hi -
I just got a new MacBook and have an iMac that is still the "hub" of my photo library. It is, in fact, about a 180 GB iPhoto library. I know that I can't sync libraries between Macs (a shame - someone should come up with a way to that assuming they haven't already!) so I'm just looking for any best practices?
I got the MacBook to be able to work on some photos while on the road - I can at least work on post processing in Photoshop, etc. I'm thinking now that my best strategy is to possibly work with the images on my MacBook, importing them into the iPhoto library if desired. Then use my Photo sharing service - Phanfare - to "sync" them? It requires me to download them on the other side and pull them again into the iPhoto Library on the iMac?
I don't use the Mobile Me Gallery but I suppose that would be another way to have access to them on the alternate computer?
Any other best practices or suggestions?
Thx!

So, if there are times when I'm not home to access my external drive, then going with the two libraries is the best solution, yes?
Perhaps, but you can get very small and portable external HDs these days.
I'm not sure though if I should really make both a 180 GB iPhoto library, do you? It is a back up true, but seems like a chunk to move
But you only do it once. The first time. Thereafter you're simply updating the other with the changes.
At least maybe I could split into pictures from 2009 - 2010 and have that library for both my iMac and the MacBook. I very rarely access before then (only if I need something specific) so then I could access that via the iMac exclusively?
That would be viable.
I would maintain a +full Library+ on the Desktop, the mobile versions a Smaller subset.
I'm sort of ruling out the one library on the external solution because it eliminates the possibility of being remote -
As I said above you can get tiny portable drives...
unless there is some swanky Login to My Computer or something that works with a Mac that can go remotely to my computer and then to my external drive.
*_This_* might help.
Regards
TD

Best practices for managing Movies (iPhoto, iMovie) to IPhone

I am looking for some basic recommendations best practices on managing the syncing of movies to my iPhone. Most of my movies either come from a digital camcorder into iMovie or from a digital Camera into iPhone.
Issues:
1. If I do an export or a share from iPhoto, iMovie, or QuickTime, what formats should I select. I've seem 3gp, mv4.
2. When I add a movie to iTunes, where is it stored. I've seen some folder locations like iMovie Sharing/iTunes. Can I copy them directly there or should I always add to library in iTunes?
3. If I want to get a DVD I own into a format for the iPhone, how might I do that?
Any other recommedations on best practices are welcome.
Thanks
mek

1. If you type "iphone" or "ipod" into the help feature in imovie it will tell you how.
"If you want to download and view one of your iMovie projects to your iPod or iPhone, you first need to send it to iTunes. When you send your project to iTunes, iMovie allows you to create one or more movies of different sizes, depending on the size of the original media that’s in your project. The medium-sized movie is best for viewing on your iPod or iPhone."
2. Mine appear under "movies" which is where imovie put them automatically.
3. If you mean movies purchased on DVD, then copying them is illegal and cannot be discussed here.
From the terms of use of this forum:
"Keep within the Law
No material may be submitted that is intended to promote or commit an illegal act.
Do not submit software or descriptions of processes that break or otherwise ‘work around’ digital rights management software or hardware. This includes conversations about ‘ripping’ DVDs or working around FairPlay software used on the iTunes Store."

Workflow not completed, is this best practice for PR?

Hi SAP Workflow experts,
I am new in workflow and now responsible to support existing PR release workflow.
The workflow is quite simple and straightforward but the issue here is the workflow seems like will never be completed.
If the user released the PR, the next activity is Requisition released that using task TS20000162.
This will send work item to user (pr creator) sap inbox which when they double click it will complete the workflow.
The thing here is, in our organization, user does not access SAP inbox hence there are thousands of work item that has not been completed. (our procurement system started since 2009).
Our PR creator will receive notification of the PR approval to theirs outlook mail handled by a program that is scheduled every 5 minutes.
Since the documentation is not clear enough, i can't digest why the implementer used this approach.
May I know whether this is the best practice for PR workflow or not?
Now my idea is to modify the send email program to complete the workitem after the email being sent to user outlook mail.
Not sure whether it is common or not though in workflow world.
Any help is deeply appreciated.
Thank you.

Hello,
"This will send work item to user (pr creator) sap inbox which when they double click it will complete the workflow."
It sounds liek they are sending a workitem where an email would be enough. By completing the workitem they are simply acknowledging that they have received notification of the completion of the PR.
"Our PR creator will receive notification of the PR approval to theirs outlook mail handled by a program that is scheduled every 5 minutes."
I hope (and assume) that they only receive the email once.
I would change the workflow to send an email (SendMail step) to the initiator instead of the workitem. That is normally what happens. Either that or there is no email at all - some businesses only send an email if something goes wrong. Of course, the business has to agree to this change.
Having that final workitem adds nothing to the process. Replace it with an email.
regards
Rick Bakker
hanabi technology

Transfer iphoto library to external harddrive. Best practice?

Need to transfer iphoto library to external harddrive due to space issues. Best practice?

Moving the iPhoto library is safe and simple - quit iPhoto and drag the iPhoto library intact as a single entity to the external drive - depress the option key and launch iPhoto using the "select library" option to point to the new location on the external drive - fully test it and then trash the old library on the internal drive (test one more time prior to emptying the trash)
And be sure that the External drive is formatted Mac OS extended (journaled) (iPhoto does not work with drives with other formats) and that it is always available prior to launching iPhoto
And backup soon and often - having your iPhoto library on an external drive is not a backup and if you are using Time Machine you need to check and be sure that TM is backing up your external drive
LN

Best practice for workflow triggering from Web Dynpro UI

Hello, workflow community!
I'm working on a task which allow to trigger the workflow by clicking a button in Web Dynpro UI. As always, there are multiple ways to do that, for instance, to use SAP Workflow API (SAP_WAPI_START_WORKFLOW) or to raise an event upon the button click, which will be caught by workflow template.
In my opinion, the optimal solution is to call FM, which will call ABAP-class, raising an event, which, in turn, will be caught by workflow template. In this case, FM will service kind of wrapper, where we can implement some additional checks if needed.
But the question is what approach is the best practice — to raise an event or use SAP_WAPI_*?
Thanks.

let combine, use SAP_WAPI_CREATE_EVENT
usually I would not recommend creating a workflow directly (SAP_WAPI_START_WORKFLOW) since when I look for workflows in a system I usually start from SWE2 (the event linkage) which uses events so the workflow you start by SAP_WAPI_START_WORKFLOW will not be seen there, also SWE2 gives you better control for starting the workflow, you can easily deactivate an event linkage. finding where you called the workflow by SAP_WAPI_START_WORKFLOW will be more difficult and deactivation will require a code change.
so use events, and start them by SAP_WAPI_CREATE_EVENT
Also pay attention that you have a check function module option in SWE2.

Best practice for smooth workflow in PrE?

Hi all. I'm an FCP user for many many years, but I'm helping an artist friend of mine with a Kickstarter video...and he's insistent that he's going to do it himself on his Dell laptop running Win7 and PrE (I believe v11, from the CS3 package)...so I'm turning to the forum here for some help.
In Apple Land (that is, those of us still using FCP 7), we take all our elements in whatever format they're delivered to us and transcode them to ProRes, DVCPro HD or XDCAM...it just makes it easier not to deal with mixed formats on the timeline (please, no snarky comments about that, OK, I turn out broadcast work every week doing this so this method's got something going for it...). However, when I fired up PrE I see that you can edit in all sorts of formats, including long-GOP formats like .mts and mp4 files that I wouldn't dream of working with natively in FCP...I don't enjoy staring at spinning beachballs that much.
Now, remembering that he's working with a severely underpowered laptop, with 2 gig of RAM, and a USB2 connection to his 7200 rpm "video" drive...and also considering that most of the video he'll be using will come in two flavors (AVHCD from a Canon Vixia 100, and HDV from a Canon EX-something or other), what would be the best way to proceed to maximize the ease at which he can edit? I'm thinking that transcoding to something like Motion-JPEG or some other inter-frame compressed AVI format would be the way to go...it's a short video and he won't have that much material so file size inflation isn't an issue...speed and ease of processing the video files on the timeline (or do they call it a "Sceneline") is.
Any advice (besides "buy another computer") would be appreciated...

Steve, thanks, this is helping me now.
I mention MJPEG because, as an Interframe compression method, it's less processor-intensive than GOP style MPEG compressions. Again, my point of reference is the Mac/FCP7 world (so open my eyes as to how an Intel processor running Win7 would work differently), but over there best practice says NOT to edit in a GOP-base codec (XDCAM being the exception which proves the rule, eg, render times), but to transcode everything from, say, h264 or AVCwhatever into ProRes. YES, I know PrE (and PPRO) doesn't use ProRes...not asking that. But, at least at this juncture, any sort of a hardware upgrade is out of the question...this is what he's gonna be using to edit. Now if I was going to be using an underpowered Mac laptop to try and edit, I most certainly would not try to push native AVCHD .mts files or native h264 files through it...those don't even work well with the biggest MacPro towers. What is it about PrE that allows it to efficiently work with these processor-intensive formats? This is the crux of the issue, as I'm going to advise my friend to "work this way" and I don't want to send him down the garden path of render hell...
And finally, your advice to run tests is well-given...since I have no experience with PrE and his computer, I guess that's where we'll start...

Best Practice for Conversion Workflow

Hello,
I'm converting video files from our "home grown" virtual media reserve to iTunes U. Some of the files are in RM format, some are already compressed .mov's (not H.264) and some I have the original DV files for.
Anyone out there have a best practice for converting these file types for posting to iTunes U? I have Final Cut Studio (Compressor), QT Pro and Squeeze available to me.
Any experience you have with this would be helpful.
Thanks,
Jeana

For converting old files to a podcast compatible video and based on the machine you have, consider elgato turbo.264. It is a fairly priced "co-processor" for video conversion. It is comprised of an application and a small USB device with a encoder chip in it. In my experience, it is the fastest way to create podcast video files. The amount of time that you will save will pay for the device quickly (about $100). Plus it does batch conversion of any video that your system currently plays through QuickTime. it has all the necessary presets and you can create your own. It has a few minor limitations such as not supporting (at this moment) enhanced podcasting features such as chapter markers and closed-captions but since you have old files for conversion, that won't matter.
For creating new content, the workflow varies a lot. Since you mention MP3s, I guess you are also interested in audio files. I would stick with GarageBand, especially if you are a beginner plus it supports enhanced podcasts.
In any case the most important goal is to have the simplest and fastest way to go from recording to publication. The less editing the better. To attain that, the best methods will require the largest investments. For example, for video production the best way is to produce the content live so when you finish recording it is only a matter of encoding and publishing. that will require the use of a video switcher that can ingest at least one video camera and a computer output to properly capture presentation material. That's the minimum. there are several devices that can do this for you. Some are disguised PCs and some connect to a PC for tapeless recording. You can check the Tricaster, which I like but wish it was a Mac and not a Windows Xp PC. Other routes may include video mixers from manufacturers like Edirol, Pansonic or Sony connected to a VTR or directly to a Mac for direct-ti-disc capture. I f you look at some of the content available in iTunes U, you will see what I explain here. This workflow requires preparation and sufficient live support but you will have your material ready for delivery almost immediately after the recorded event. No editing required. Finally, the most intensive workflow is to record everything separately and edit it later, which is extremely time consuming.

Oracle Custom Workflow Redesign best practices

Hi All,
Morning , need some help with this scenario.
We are in the process of redesigning existing developed custom Oracle Workflows in our system ( Oracle Apps Release 12.0.6 )
hence wanted to know if there are steps or guidelines/best practices which could be followed in this situation on points like handling performance issues with the workflow , how to handle the purging of the obsolete workflow data , design steps regards notifications, how to handle error conditions with workflow activities and how to retry activities ( means if any activity within the workflow process shows error how it could be retried or re executed in real time without any delay).
means any pointers which could be considered for this redesign actvity , any best practices document/steps and guidelines would be really very very helpful here...
Regards

This is a very broad question - narrowing it to specifics might help folks respond better.
There are a lot of documents on MOS that refer to best practices from a technology stack perspective.
Oracle Workflow Best Practices Release 12 and Release 11i (Doc ID 453137.1)
As far as functional practices are concerned, these may vary from module to module, as functionality and workflow implementation vary from module to module.
FAQ: Best Practices For Custom Order Entry Workflow Design (Doc ID 402144.1)
HTH
Srini

IPhoto 11: Best practice to export a slideshow

Hi all,
after reading some posts on this matter I'm almost more confused than beginning so I hope someone can help me with "latest" best practices.
Hi have iPhoto 11 and normally I'm making slideshows for watching on HD TV.
For DVD burning I'm using Toast 11 (instead of iDVD).
Then, considering that converting in DVD I'll loose in quality, which are the best export parameters I should use ?
I've been suggested to use (I may have transalted something wrongly as I'm using the Italian version):
Export -> Personal Setting
Keeping "Export for Quick Time usage" -> Options
Under Video tab:
Compression: H.264
Speed Frequency: 25 (for PAL) with Automatic below
Compressor Quality: Max
Codify: Quick (single)
Under Dimension tab:
Dimension: 1920x1080 HD
Thanks in advance for your advice here.
Regards
Giancarlo

OK, so let me repeat just to be sure I understood well.
Could you confirm that all parameters I'm using are OK but dimensions?
About dimensions:
a. use 720x526 when I'm burning a standard DVD for 4:3
b. use 1024x576 when I'm burning a standard DVD for 16:9 .... is this feasible or just a. is available ?
c. use 1280x720 or 1920x1080 when I'm burning a BR (for HD watching)
Am I right ?
Regards
Giancarlo

Best Practice, Going from iPhoto to Aperture 3

I'm looking for advice on a best practice of moving from an iPhoto Library to Aperture 3. That is, if I even should do so.
I know that I can keep the photos in place (in iPhoto) and still access them from Aperture. (Or import just selected photos as needed.) Assuming disk space isn't an issue, would it not be better to import all of the iPhoto library into Aperture and only use Aperture going forward?
Is there a reason I might want to consider another path?
Any other setup advice for about to be first time users would be appreciated. Anything from your experiences you'd wish you had done differently etc.
Thanks

Welcome to Aperture. The question of whether to use just one photo app be it iPhoto or Aperture or to try and use both has been covered here extensively.
The short answer is to pick one of the applications and commit to it. Trying to use both in some combination is at best going to make your life miserable and at worst, well whats worst than a miserable life?
I know that I can keep the photos in place (in iPhoto) and still access them from Aperture. (Or import just selected photos as needed.) Assuming disk space isn't an issue, would it not be better to import all of the iPhoto library into Aperture and only use Aperture going forward?
Yes you can keep the photos in iPhotos library, you can move them into Aperture library or you could move them to some other place on your disk and have Aperture access them from there. Again if your going to use Aperture then the best advice is to only use it.
Any other setup advice for about to be first time users would be appreciated. Anything from your experiences you'd wish you had done differently etc.
Take the time to become familiar with the different possible configurations of the Aperture library. The User manual is a good place to start, they did a good job explaining it all. And of course use this list, there are may good posts if you search for them, and many good people willing to offer advice.

Best practice to back up our most important asset : iPhoto!

Hi everyone!
I consider my 30k photos which I've carefully tagged/marked/modified/red eyed/etc as my most important asset. I've spent days and days on iPhoto to eventually build this 50GB library.
I've bought my 500 GB TC few months ago and now guess what, it's completely full!
Modifications calculation, deletion and updates of my library are now taking forever. I understand from this board that Time Machine/TC is updating the 50GB as a whole instead of updating only the modifications ... what a nightmare in this almost ideal apple world!
Any recommendation to share? Any free apps to do this work for me?
So far my personal brainstorming came to this process:
1) download "Time Machine Editor"
2) schedule updates to be daily or weekly
3) be patient
Thanks for sharing your best practices!
dofre

I would get a program such as SuperDuper ( http://www.versiontracker.com/dyn/moreinfo/macosx/22126 ) to CLONE your hard drive onto the external (as an image, if you don't have a free partition) and then when your new HD comes back, clone it back.
SuperDuper is well worth the $20 shareware fee.

Best practice for reclassifying Cost Center/Element

Dear experts,
Currently the company I'm working for are using SA document (FB50) if there are mistakes when posting cost to Cost Center, they will DR New Cost Center and CR Old Cost Center.
However, it is seem a bit difficult to trace the changes later on. Hence, I would like to ask for opinions on what is the best practice for reclassifying cost center or cost element.
Right now, I'm planning to propose of using KB11N to reclassify cost center. Is this a good practice and easy to trace the cost movement? Is there any different with normal journal adjustment via FB50 and KB11N?
Need some advices from experts.

Hi:
Both options are viable. If you reverse posting in FB50 then FI GL account postings will also be reversed and along with cost center postings. Hence here advantage is that cost center reversal will be with referenced to the original document with which wrong posting were made. Disadvantage here is that you will to post the entry again in FB50 . In KB11N you will simply transfer cost center amount from wrong to new one that should be in place of it but here you will have no reference . I personally think reversing posting through FB50 is viable options , reverse postings can be seen in KSB1 as well against that cost center.
Regards

Elements workflow to iPhoto-best practice?

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for