Enhanced Interafce Determination Split Mapping Performance factor

Hi,
I want to know is it a good practice to use Split Mapping using the Enhanced Interface Determination (EO-Maintain Order at Runtime is unchecked) and let the JEE adapter handle bundlings, etc.
If the number of messages split are more say in order of thousands, it causes severe stress on the JEE Server and it goes down.
Is Enhanced Interface Determination recommended to be used for high volume or any parmeters have to be tuned for its use.
Thanks.
Regards,
Sudharshan N A

Hi
Enhanced Interface Determination can be used for High Volume
BPM is the other option for multimapping.
But as compared to BPM , Enhanced interface Determination is the better option by performance .
Regards
Abhijit

Similar Messages

How enhanced receiver determination works..?

hi all,
In enhanced receiver determination Interface mapping(which has java mapping) I have also included logic to make some change in content of input file and dynamic configuration for output file name. My input and output are flat files. So I m using dummy structure. In interface determination i m not referring any Interface mapping.
Receiver determination is working properly But neither dynamic file name nor the changes in content of file are reflecting in out put file.
Is it mandatory to use separate mapping in interface determination to change the content of file and dynamic file name?
Thanks
Jai
Edited by: Jaideep Baid on May 29, 2010 6:27 PM

Is it mandatory to use separate mapping in interface determination to change the content of file and dynamic file name?
The mapping used to in receiver Determination is to decide the Receiver.....the mapping used in Interface Determination is to create the target structure....both are to be developed and used separately (one in Receiver Determination and other in Interface Determination respectively)....this wiki gives you an example:
http://wiki.sdn.sap.com/wiki/display/SI/StepbyStepguidetoExplainEnhancedReceiver+Determination
Regards,
Abhishek.

Enhanced Receiver Determination synchronous

Hi all,
I am running into a bit of a problem when using enhanced receiver determination on a SOAP - XI - RFC scenario on a NW2004 SP17 XI system.
According to the help.sap.com (http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw04/helpdata/en/43/a5f2066340332de10000000a11466f/content.htm) I have to make an interface mapping to the "ReceiverDetermination" async abstract interface.
Here is my problem: "ReceiverDetermination" is asynchronous and my source (SOAP) interface is synchronous, but it seems impossible to define a interface mapping between a synchronous and asynchronous interface.
Do any of you have any ideas and/or suggestions to solve my current predicament?
Steven

Hi,
After some experimentation I found a solution.
It involves building a sync/sync bridge in an Integration Process and using a Receiver Determination step in that Integration Process.
The Integration Process forces you to store the request/response messages in an abstract ASYNC interface. When the Receiver Determination step calls the Receiver Determination Object in the directory, it uses the abstract async interface of the request message, instead of normal sync interface.
This enables you to build an enhanced receiver determination interface mapping using the abstract async interface used to store the message in the integration process.
Steven

Enhanced receiver determination and value mapping

I want to use enhanced receiver determination functionality in my scenario.
I couldn't see any message interface or data type under http://sap.com/xi/XI/System.
we are on Sp08 nw04s and SAP BASIS 7.0 software component in IR.
I don't want to hard code my business service name in mapping.How can I achieve this?
Thanks,
Rekha.
Message was edited by:
Rekha Lather

Hi,
> couldn't see any message interface or data type under http://sap.com/xi/XI/System.
we are on Sp08 nw04s and SAP BASIS 7.0 software component in IR.
After upgradation to SP08 on NW04s , did you reimport the SAP BASIS Component into your IR? Ask your basis admin team to reimport the SAP basis Component into the IR.
>I don't want to hard code my business service name in mapping.How can I achieve this?
Similar discussion available in the comments section of this blog,
/people/venkataramanan.parameswaran/blog/2006/03/17/illustration-of-enhanced-receiver-determination--sp16
Would suggest you use value Mapping.
Regards
Bhavesh

Abap proxy with attachments in enhanced interface determination/mapping

Hi guys.
We were receiving a abap proxy from ECC with a pdf attached in the header.
This was the scenario PROXY ---> FILE
We used the PayloadSwapBean Module in a Receiver File Adapter to get this document and put it in a FTP Server.
Now we have to make and improvement in the scenario and we have to generate two receiver interfaces so the scenario looks like this:
PROXY ---> FILE and JDBC.
So we have to use an enhanced interface mapping and an enhanced interface determination.
The problem is that with this enhanced interface determination/mapping the attached document is lost.
Any solution?
Thanks a lot.
Regards.

> The problem is that with this enhanced interface determination/mapping the attached document is lost.
I know there was an issue in early PI 7.1 SP versions. maybe you find a bug fix for this?
Otherwise report to SAP.

Enhanced Reciever Determination Map problem

Hi,
i am working on enhanced reciever determination, i followed this blog for reference
/people/venkataramanan.parameswaran/blog/2006/03/17/illustration-of-enhanced-receiver-determination--sp16
after the mapping recievers MT (predefined from BASIS) . i have tested with the following payload and it is working fine.i got my ERD is working
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<ns0:MT_SampleFile_sx xmlns:ns0="urn:TestScenario">
 <Person>
 <name>mr</name>
 <age>123</age>
 </Person>
 <Person>
 <name>ms</name>
 <age>12</age>
 </Person>
</ns0:MT_SampleFile_sx>
if i give the payload with more mr or ms node like below, i am getting error.
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<ns0:MT_SampleFile_sx xmlns:ns0="urn:TestScenario">
 <Person>
 <name>mr</name>
 <age>123</age>
 </Person>
 <Person>
 <name>mr</name>
 <age>12</age>
 </Person>
 <Person>
 <name>ms</name>
 <age>1256</age>
 </Person>
</ns0:MT_SampleFile_sx>
ERROR: Cannot produce target element /ns1:Receivers/Receiver[3]/Service. Check xml instance is valid for source xsd and target-field mapping fulfills requirements of target xsd
can any one help me to solve this problem
Thank You,
Madhav

Hi,
I had checked UDF. As per UDF you want to give ,
<name>mr</name>
instead
<name>Mr</name>
Change the payload and map like below,
Receiver:
Name(Change Context to parent)--SplitByValue(ValueChange)--CollapseContext--Receiver
Service:
Name(Change Context to parent)--ServiceDetermination(UDF)--SplitByValue(EachValue)--Service
Regards,
Prakasu.M

1:2 Message Mapping WithOut BPM - Split mapping created no messages Error

Hi,
I am a new-bie to SAP PI and am trying out the following scenario without BPM.
Make multiple files based on Age received from input file.Input File contains Name,DOB and Output File contains Name, Age.
I want to create 2 files, one containing details of people with Age <21 and the other output file containing details of people with Age >= 21.
To acheive this,
In IR, I created 2 DT and 3 MT,1 MM with 2 Target MT,both having occurences 0..unbounded, 1 IM with 2 Target MI,both having occurences 0..unbounded
And in ID, 1 Sender Agreement, 2 Receiver Agreement, 1 Receiver Determination, 1 Interface Determination using Enhanced Interface Determination.
When i run this scenario, I am getting the following error "Split mapping created no messages"
Please let me know how can I resolve it.

Oops, I did not know that.
Thanks for that information. uhuuuuuuuuuuu, atlast the message is processed and I am seeing output files created.
But, there is still one problem. My output files are created with just the following content
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?>
<ns1:MT_2OP_File_Out xmlns:ns1="http://POC_Sec1_1IP2OP2" />
In MM, I see the output message as follows:
Message
 Message1
 MT_2OP_File_Out
 Employee
 Name
 Age
 Message2
 MT_2OP_File_Out1
 Employee1
 Name
 Age
The mapping done:
MT_2OP_File_Out and MT_2OP_File_Out with the Message Type element on source end.
Employee and Employee1 are mapped as
 Age -> removeContext -> SplitByValue[Each Value] < 21, Map Employee
 Age -> removeContext -> SplitByValue[Each Value] >= 21, Map Employee1 resp
The fields are straight maps.
Is there any basic mapping error that I am making. Please help.

No messages created from split mapping error .....

HI XI Friends..
In My XML to RFC scenario,,
i am doing message splitting withput BPM.
in message mapping ..i changed target message occurance to unbounded
and same i did in interface mapping also..
static test is OK..creating multiple target messages in static test.
in interface determination,using enhanced option i given interface mapping.
file is picking but in SXMB_MONI ...i am getting error like this
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes" ?>
- 
- <SAP:Error xmlns:SAP="http://sap.com/xi/XI/Message/30" xmlns:SOAP="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/envelope/" SOAP:mustUnderstand="">
<SAP:Category>XIServer</SAP:Category>
<SAP:Code area="MAPPING">GENERIC</SAP:Code>
<SAP:P1>No messages created from split mapping</SAP:P1>
<SAP:P2 />
<SAP:P3 />
<SAP:P4 />
<SAP:AdditionalText />
<SAP:ApplicationFaultMessage namespace="" />
<SAP:Stack>No messages created from split mapping</SAP:Stack>
<SAP:Retry>M</SAP:Retry>
</SAP:Error>
please guide me..
regards
ram

Hi Ram,
Check these..
Split mapping created no messages
Message Split without BPM - Error
cheers,
Prashanth
P.S Please mark helpful answers

Multi-Mapping "Split mapping created no messages"

Hi there
I have some issie when trying to create multiple messages from a single message. I am using file to file adapter and in the interface determination, enhanced config. Also my file structures are setup correctly. The inbound and outbound structure looks the same so theres no funny mapping used. I cheked my comm channels in the RWB and its fine and when I do a test config in the integration builder it complains about my interface determination but does not say whats wrong. Just the icon. I looked at some of the other blogs but they do not really help. Any ideas what this might be? The inbound message looks like this:
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?>
- <ns:MT_Allocations_Reply_OUTB xmlns:ns="urn:metcash.co.za:test">
- <IDOC_Recordset>
- <IDOC_Structure>
<PLANT>134</PLANT>
<ORDER_NUM>50885006</ORDER_NUM>
<FILLER>1</FILLER>
<PLU_NUM>00000000074893650</PLU_NUM>
<QTY>000024.00</QTY>
<FILLER_2>j</FILLER_2>
</IDOC_Structure>
- <IDOC_Structure>
<PLANT>134</PLANT>
<ORDER_NUM>50885006</ORDER_NUM>
<FILLER>1</FILLER>
<PLU_NUM>00000000074893650</PLU_NUM>
<QTY>000024.00</QTY>
<FILLER_2>j</FILLER_2>
</IDOC_Structure>
- <IDOC_Structure>
<PLANT>134</PLANT>
<ORDER_NUM>50885006</ORDER_NUM>
<FILLER>1</FILLER>
<PLU_NUM>00000000074893650</PLU_NUM>
<QTY>000024.00</QTY>
<FILLER_2>j</FILLER_2>
</IDOC_Structure>
</IDOC_Recordset>
</ns:MT_Allocations_Reply_OUTB>
*And the Error:*
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes" ?>
- 
- <SAP:Error xmlns:SAP="http://sap.com/xi/XI/Message/30" xmlns:SOAP="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/envelope/" SOAP:mustUnderstand="">
<SAP:Category>XIServer</SAP:Category>
<SAP:Code area="MAPPING">GENERIC</SAP:Code>
<SAP:P1>Split mapping created no messages</SAP:P1>
<SAP:P2 />
<SAP:P3 />
<SAP:P4 />
<SAP:AdditionalText />
<SAP:ApplicationFaultMessage namespace="" />
<SAP:Stack>Split mapping created no messages</SAP:Stack>
<SAP:Retry>M</SAP:Retry>
</SAP:Error>
Thanx,
Jan
Edited by: Jan de Lange on Nov 24, 2008 10:25 AM

I checked my config in the IR with the following payload, but is still only shows a stop icon on interface determination & mapping with no error trace:
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?>
<ns:MT_Allocations_Reply_OUTB xmlns:ns="urn:metcash.co.za:test">
<IDOC_Recordset>
<IDOC_Structure>
<PLANT>134</PLANT>
<ORDER_NUM>50885006</ORDER_NUM>
<FILLER>1</FILLER>
<PLU_NUM>00000000074893650</PLU_NUM>
<QTY>000024.00</QTY>
<FILLER_2>j</FILLER_2>
</IDOC_Structure>
<IDOC_Structure>
<PLANT>134</PLANT>
<ORDER_NUM>50885006</ORDER_NUM>
<FILLER>1</FILLER>
<PLU_NUM>00000000074893650</PLU_NUM>
<QTY>000024.00</QTY>
<FILLER_2>j</FILLER_2>
</IDOC_Structure>
<IDOC_Structure>
<PLANT>134</PLANT>
<ORDER_NUM>50885006</ORDER_NUM>
<FILLER>1</FILLER>
<PLU_NUM>00000000074893650</PLU_NUM>
<QTY>000024.00</QTY>
<FILLER_2>j</FILLER_2>
</IDOC_Structure>
</IDOC_Recordset>
</ns:MT_Allocations_Reply_OUTB>

Split mapping created no messages -Mluti Mapping

Hi ,
I am using Multimapping without BPM,XML to flat file Scenario (PI SP12) and I am getting this following error in SXMB_MONI
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes" ?>
- 
- <SAP:Error xmlns:SAP="http://sap.com/xi/XI/Message/30" xmlns:SOAP="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/envelope/" SOAP:mustUnderstand="">
<SAP:Category>XIServer</SAP:Category>
<SAP:Code area="MAPPING">GENERIC</SAP:Code>
<SAP:P1>Split mapping created no messages</SAP:P1>
<SAP:P2 />
<SAP:P3 />
<SAP:P4 />
<SAP:AdditionalText />
<SAP:ApplicationFaultMessage namespace="" />
<SAP:Stack>Split mapping created no messages</SAP:Stack>
<SAP:Retry>M</SAP:Retry>
</SAP:Error>
I know this is very known error.
I refered Split mapping created no messages
and blog /people/jin.shin/blog/2006/02/07/multi-mapping-without-bpm--yes-it146s-possible
but they didn't help,but I have just one target message structure not two like in the blog.
I double checked my source input XML file
1.mapped my header (0--unbounded) to the Message type ,cos I need to get many file as many times my header occur in the source.
2.checked in MM target Mesasge is 0---Unbounded
3.checked in IM target Messag is 0--- unbounded
4.used Enhanced Interface determination.
when I test with the same sample XML data in test MM ,I am getting
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<ns0:Messages xmlns:ns0="http://sap.com/xi/XI/SplitAndMerge"><ns0:Message1></ns0:Message1></ns0:Messages>
seems like no data in it,but system message is Mapping executed successfully
does it give like this when use multimapping?
basically it is not able to split the source message as required.
any suggestion?I think I chcked all whatever needs to be right.
thank you,
Babu

Hi Agasturi,
thank you for your response.
>>If the Pay load is huge some time it will be empty message after pasting one time try to execute it again, Let us check the error message now.
I don't think my message is huse.just 60MB but header repeating like 100 times ,so it would generate 100 output files
OK,for safe side,I just took one record from my payload and also three records from my payload (SXMB_MONI),I get the same error in SXMB_MONI
"Split mapping created no messages "
and in MM Testing similar to the previous one ,like
no output data just empty tags as given in my very first message and system status "mapping executed Successfully.
I have done similar scenarios using Muli mapping ,and I did this same way.there is no difference .I did exactly same as my earlier interface.but in this interface I have only differences from earlier interface "occurences of my source structure.
earlier I have SOURCE Header(1-unbounded ),header fields 1-1 trailer (0unbounded) trailer fields 1-1 so I created my target structure Header,header fields 1-1 and trailer(0unbounded) trailer fields 1-1 that time.
now I have
SOURCE Header(0-unbounded ),header fields 0-1 trailer (0unbounded) trailer fields 0-1 so I created my target structure Header,header fields 0-1 and trailer(0unbounded) trailer fields 0-1
and mapped my header(0unbounded) to my MT-XYZ(0unbounded (after changing in the message tab occu to 0--unbounded)) to get as many as my hear times.
any suggestion?
thank you,
Babu.

Enhanced Interface Determination?

Hi All,
I have a scenario where i need to do a header validation . if validation succeeds i have to map source to target data and sent to SAP system. if validation fails i need to map source to error data and sent it to MQ system.
I am using enhanced receiver determination for selecting proper receiver based on the header validation. but in this case inspite of failed header validation there is no error message in SXMB_MONI...
what i wanted is that when header validation fails , error message should be displaced in moni and also a error message (xml ) should be sent to MQ system.
for implemention the above mentioned feature , i took another message mapping and interface mapping where i am explicitly throwing error -- Repository work.
In configuration , i just create one more receiver determination with new message type and in existing interface determination , i added the additional interface mapping ( throwing error ).
due to above changes , i am getting three message in Moni.. if header validation fails.
1. which indicated that there is message splitting.
2. one successful message ( source to error xml file ) to be sent to MQ system.
3. error message where i am explicitly throwing error .
can we have a situation where we have only one error message in moni and also the error is sent to MQ system?..
i guess there is some feature in interface determination.. what is enhaced interface determination..
I hope i am clear with my requirement..
Ranjeet Singh...

Have a look
/people/robin.schroeder/blog/2006/11/15/using-dynamic-receiver-determination-with-sync-interface
/people/venkataramanan.parameswaran/blog/2006/03/17/illustration-of-enhanced-receiver-determination--sp16
List of receivers can be dyamically determined and assigned at runtime using enhanced receiver determination .
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw04/helpdata/en/43/a5f2066340332de10000000a11466f/content.htm
Thanks

Enhanced Inerface Determination for File to IDoc scenario

I am using Enhanced Interface Determination in my scenario - where I map my source message (from a single instance) into more than one IDoc messages (separate instance of Idoc for each occurance of a particular segment in the source message). To implement this I am 1:n message mapping for Message Splitting.
The mapping is being executed successfully and several instances of the target IDoc type is being created at the runtime. But at the technical routing step I am getting error:
<SAP:Stack>Messages in multi-message format can only be sent to one Adapter Engine</SAP:Stack>
Does this mean that we cannot use Multi-Mapping for Message Splitting for IDoc Outbound Channels? Even if all the target messages (more than one) are being sent through the same Inbound interface and same Reciever IDoc Channel?
Regards,
Suddha

Thanks Farooq for your valuable advice.
You know what, I read those restrictions in the help.sap.com but had thought there must be some work around. It says split messages are sent using only one AE, but I hoped that Idoc and Http can be used as they are not part of AE and rather IE itself. Anyways, can't help...............but could help me understand what are the technical reasons for these restrictions?
The blog is really a nice one and very helpful..............thanks! I used multi-mapping in exactly similar way as in the blog and used enhanced interface determination - but the target message being Idoc
Is BPM the only option for my scenario?
Regards,
Suddha

Error with Enhanced Interface determination

Hi Experts,
In enhanced interface determination for message splitting w/o BPM, i have given the interface mapping.
But while testing the configuration.......... i am getiing an error at Interface Determination & Mapping which is not showing any processing log.
My mapping program works fine.
could anyone tell me where the problem is....

Hi,
Can you post the error message that you are getting....it will help experts solve your problem accurately.
Regards,
Abhishek.

Intermittent JDBC error in Enhanced Receiver Determination

Hi,
I have an interface that use Enhanced Receiver Determination in PI 7.1 EHP1.
The database is DB2 on i5/os 6.1
Sometimes message ends in error :Error when determining the receiver: Problem while determining receivers using interface mapping: Runtime exception occurred during application mapping com/sap/xi/tf/_HI01_to_ReceiverDetermination_;
But the same message with same values is successfull earlier.
This is not a design problem; the interface is working well 95% of the time.
I found some JDBC error in NWA java logs:
Error in sax handler parsing request: Error when executing statement for table/stored proc. 'table' (structure 'statement'): java.sql.SQLException: [SQL0104] Token "BUSINESS_SYSTEM" was not valid. Valid tokens: FOR SKIP WITH FETCH ORDER UNION EXCEPT OPTIMIZE.
Error when calling an adapter by using the communication channel CC_RECEIVER_JDBC_PIDB2 (Party: *, Service: INTEGRATION_SERVER_PX1, Object ID: cb7ea38fb2ac3a06b12d79f5ade2bcf7) XI AF API call failed. Module exception: (No information available). Cause Exception: 'Error processing request in sax parser: Error when executing statement for table/stored proc. 'table' (structure 'statement'): java.sql.SQLException: [SQL0104] Token "BUSINESS_SYSTEM" was not valid. Valid tokens: FOR SKIP WITH FETCH ORDER UNION EXCEPT OPTIMIZE.'.
Thrown:
com.sap.aii.af.service.api.AFException: XI AF API call failed. Module exception: (No information available). Cause Exception: 'Error processing request in sax parser: Error when executing statement for table/stored proc. 'table' (structure 'statement'): java.sql.SQLException: [SQL0104] Token "BUSINESS_SYSTEM" was not valid. Valid tokens: FOR SKIP WITH FETCH ORDER UNION EXCEPT OPTIMIZE.'.
at com.sap.aii.af.service.api.AdapterAccess.sendMsg(AdapterAccess.java:214)
at com.sap.aii.af.service.api.AdapterAccess.execute(AdapterAccess.java:283)
at com.sap.aii.ibrun.server.lookup.AdapterProxyLocal.execute(AdapterProxyLocal.java:119)
at com.sap.aii.ibrun.server.lookup.SystemAccessorInternal.execute(SystemAccessorInternal.java:76)
at com.sap.aii.mapping.lookup.DataBaseAccessor.execute(DataBaseAccessor.java:74)
at com.sap.aii.mappingtool.flib7.SelectSingle.selectSingle(SelectSingle.java:54)
at sun.reflect.GeneratedMethodAccessor607.invoke(Unknown Source)
at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:25)
at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:592)
Any idea? Can high volume cause the JDBC Receiver to fail?
Martin

hi,
you r trying to impliment Lookup for the file adapter which is not synch in nature and hance u r not getting the responce back.
please find the link which deals with how to impliment lookup for file adapter.
https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/scn/wiki?path=/display/xi/file%252blookup%252bin%252budf.
now once u get rhe runtime receiver u can perform enhanced receiver determination (write a simple UDF)
regards,
navneet.

Interface Determination under Enhanced Receiver Determination Scenario

Hi,
One of the very basic assumption for Enhanced Receiver Determination is that Receivers are found at run time, and one of the such requirement is that we don't know about Receiver Business System at the time of configuration.
Now for such scenarios, how do we configure "Interface Determination". For Interface Determination one of the input filed is "Receiver Service/Party", in addition to "Sender Service/Party" plus "Sender Interface"
Since we don't know Receivers at config, what value(s) should come in "Receiver Service/Party" in Interface Determination at config time.
Thanking all of you in advance

Hi Rajan,
You have to do the following things:-
First, maintain Database Table in SAP XI. Which contains several keys like Sender, Receiver system and then according to that key combination we perform a JCO call and fetch the values which gives us the correct receiver and interface.
Create a Data Type which will be having Two elements Service And Interface.
Now careate a message type and message interface for this data type. This will be for your receiver.
Then use source payload and perform a message mapping between Sender Payload & this Message Type.
Use UDF and make a JCO call and fetch table entries for service and interface.
Then in Directory perform extended determination and use this mapping into it. The result will be Service & Interface.
Thanqs
Biplab

Enhanced Interafce Determination Split Mapping Performance factor

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for