Error when doing validation for fieldsoftable inTable maintenance generator

Hi All,
I have issue after doing table maintenance generator for a a table.
Actually i have created a table then table maintenance genarator also created.
Then i need to do some validatons on few of these table fields so i went to Screen of Table Maintenance and Added on MODULE Validations at the end.
Then double clicked on that include but by mistake i have added that module in standard Include LSVIMF04.
And there i added one condition for table field and saved/checked code.
And then i have come out of that code.
Now this code is effecting All the Table maintenance screens in my system.
How can i solve this issue.
I will not be able to go to that include again and revert back the changes.
Can anybody solve this issue!
Thanks,
Deep.

Hi,
As it is a standard include we will not be able to edit at all.
When Table maintenance screen is opened it is giving error saying Table not declared.
We will not be able to do any manipulation.
Thanks,
Deep.

Similar Messages

  • Validation for records inTable maintaince generator

    Hi friends,
    I have created a table ZSTUDENT_INFO. and i have created a table maintaince generator for it....
    now i have fields...
    ZSCHOOL , ZCLASS , ZNAME , ZAGE  , ZROLLNO.
    now i have school and class as key fieilds....
    now my requiremnet is when the user his entering his records
    case 1)  for same school and class the roll number is unique ie : we cant have 2 persons with same roll numbers
                        for example  :
                             school        class      name     age     roll no
                                Adams      4            rahul       8         2
                                Adams      5            Rahul      9         2
                               adams       4            kiran        8         2
    ist 2 records are differnet ist record is 4thclass and 2nd record is for 5th class but the rd record is same as ist record...
    now in this case the user should not able to save the 3rd record as alredy same record is there..
    case 2)  when the user is entering the record he should check in the table whetther the same combination alredy exits in teh table or not .. if exists it should give us an error mesage saying data already exits..
    How can i do this and where should i do this...
    Regards
    Satish

    Hi satish,
    First of all if it is a key field system will take care of giving the duplicate record error.
    If you want to do any validations in table maintenance generator. Please check the following links or search the forum
    with the Table Maintenace Generator events.
    https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/scn/go/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/8129f164-0a01-0010-2a8e-8765287250fc?overridelayout=true
    https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/scn/go/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/8129f164-0a01-0010-2a8e-8765287250fc
    If i misunderstood your requirement, please elaborate the question.
    Thanks

  • Error when doing GR for production order with serial number

    I'm not familiar with serial number and equipment management but I'm trying to help my user resolve this issue.
    This product is returned from customer site.
    I saw that this material is being reset in IQ02 from status in warehouse to become Available when the material is consumed in the production order via 261 movement type. So now the status is available. Then the user went to change a new serial number. Later, GR for production order is done in MB31. Errors are encountered when prompted to enter the new serial number.
    Configurations XX01 and XX02 are different
    Message no. CX126
    Configuration of serial number SN02 incompatible with document item
    Message no. IO226

    Hi..
    Can you please explain in detail, I facing same problem, while assigning unrestricted stock to sales order.
    Regards,
    Sumit Pukale

  • Account Determination Error when doing GI for Delivery from Projects

    Hi,
    When we try and Goods Issue a delivery from Projects, we get the following error:
    Account determination for entry 0 GBB 0001 ___ 7900 not possible
    We are not sure why the Account grouping code comes through with no value. Please could someone assist with this issue.
    Regards,
    De Wet

    Hi,
    Check in T code OBYC,whether the account determination is maintained against the valuation class for BPX.
    Regards

  • Error when doing LA for PO related to vendor 310000

    HI Expert,
    My user is trying to do LA for PO related to vendor 310000 but she's having error says :
    "Enter / rate type M for 2010.04.01 in the system setting"
    When i check long text error, it says that :
    DIAGNOSIS
    For conversion of an amount into another currency, an entry is missing in the currency conversion table
    PROCEDURE
    Add the missing entry in the currency conversion table
    My question is, what is the table for currency conversion? what entry is missing? where do i check? Is there any tcode i can use to check? Please advise

    Please check this answered link:
    Imports PO
    PO
    Edited by: Afshad Irani on May 19, 2010 3:52 PM

  • SharePoint Error "The security validation for this page is invalid" when delete an item

    Hi,
    I have SharePoint 2010 setup and works fine until today all of a sudden it throws error "The security validation for this page is invalid" when delete a SharePoint document or list item.
    There is no custom event handler deployed on library/list, and it should not be account issue as the same account works yesterday, and even after I turn off security validation from Central Admin, it still doesn't work.
    The only change I did is turn off Dynamic Compression from IIS, after that I tried enable back Dynamic Compression but it still doesn't work.
    Does anyone know what could be the possible reasons? Thanks in advance.

    hi,
     in the page just try to make this :
    <SharePoint:FormDigest runat="server" />
    PrasadWT

  • Error while doing  GR for scheduling aggrement

    Dear Experts,
    We are facing error while doing GR for scheduling aggrement.
    we have done the following steps.
    1) Scheduling aggreement in ME31L
    2) Released in ME35L
    3) Mainatined Sch.Agmt Schdule in ME38 for todays and date 200 qty and other line is 800 qty.
    When we are trying to do GR in MIGO system is giving the following message.
    Document 5500000152 does not contain any selectable items
    can I know what I have missed in the above steps.
    Please guide me to resolve this.
    Regards,
    Prasad

    Hi,
    Please check Please check if Gr is already done against this document.  Also please check whether you have attached SA in the source list with line items.
    T-code:ME01
    Enter Mat.code & Plant.
    In the next screen pl.do the following:
    Valid from - commencement date of the SA
    Valid to - End date of the SA
    Vendor - Vendor on whom the SA is released
    POrg - Your purchase organisation
    PPL - Leave it blank(This is only for interplant)
    OUn - Ordering unit
    Agreement - SA number
    Item - 1
    I hope this will resolve your issue. Thanking you

  • I am getting error while doing MFBF for semifinisg good

    Hi,
    i am getting error while doing MFBF for semifinisg good
    Existing standard cost estimate cannot be used
    Message no. RM175
    Diagnosis
    This error appears under the following circumstances:
    The existing standard cost estimate cannot be used for backflushing activities as the repetitive manufacturing profile was not maintained correctly when the standard cost estimate was carried out.
    The standard cost estimate must come from product costing. Other cost estimates (such as base object controlling) are not possible.
    Procedure
    The repetitive manufacturing profile assigned to the material at the time of the planned cost estimate must be a profile for repetitive manufacturing with product cost collector.
    Use product costing to create the standard cost estimate.

    I had already check REM profile repetitive mfg profile final backflush w. activities.
    this particular material is semifinish material attached in BOM of finish material.
    backflush of finish good is possible but now new requirement is to do production booking for the semifinish material.
    i had assign production version , done routing and maintain REM profile,
    created material cost with quantity structure ck11n then run the costing in ck40n.
    still getting the error what else is to done to able to book this thru MFBF.

  • Error when loggong on for external ID "": Error during SAML 2.0 logon

    Hi,
    I'm getting be below error when trying to use SAML SSO for a ABAP Webdynpro page on a NW 7.4 system. When I access the page, it redirects to the identity provider, comes back to the page and it shows the logon page. I'm looking for any ideas of things I could look at.
    N  SAML20 SP (client 400): Incoming Response
    N  SAML20 Binding:          POST
    N  SAML20 IdP Name:         http://xxxxxx/adfs/services/trust
    N  SAML20 Status Code:      urn:oasis:names:tc:SAML:2.0:status:Responder
    N  SAML20 SP (client 400): Default ACS endpoint: https://xxxxxx/sap/saml2/sp/acs/400 , old default ACS endpoint
    N  SAML-Trace: CALL 'SAML login': SY-SUBRC = 222 , PWDCHG = 0
    N  *** ERROR => SAML-Trace: Path = /sap/bc/webdynpro/sap/oauth2_authority [sign.c       16519]
    N  {root-id=005056AD26DF1ED4B69880FF4BE51F68}_{conn-id=005056AD26DF1ED4B69880FF4BE53F68}_1
    N  *** ERROR => SAML-Trace: Returncode = 222 [sign.c       16519]
    N  *** ERROR => SAML-Trace: Message class = SAML number = 011 [sign.c       16519]
    N  *** ERROR => SAML-Trace: Message = Error when logging on for external ID "": Error during SAML 2.0 logon [sign.c       16519]
    I have updated the service to use alternate logon procedure and added the handler CL_HTTP_EXT_SAML20
    I have added the identity provider through transaction SAML2, but it does not seem to be working.
    Here is a decrypted SAML assertion:
    <samlp:Response ID="_9c844d84-8117-4851-8270-aeb12e935daf"
      Version="2.0"
      IssueInstant="2015-04-02T00:21:06.477Z"
      Destination="https://xxxxxxxxx/sap/saml2/sp/acs/400"
      Consent="urn:oasis:names:tc:SAML:2.0:consent:unspecified"
      InResponseTo="S005056ad-26df-1ed4-b699-c4c630853f68"
      xmlns:samlp="urn:oasis:names:tc:SAML:2.0:protocol"
      >
      <Issuer xmlns="urn:oasis:names:tc:SAML:2.0:assertion">http://xxxxxxxx.com/adfs/services/trust</Issuer>
      <ds:Signature xmlns:ds="http://www.w3.org/2000/09/xmldsig#">
      <ds:SignedInfo>
      <ds:CanonicalizationMethod Algorithm="http://www.w3.org/2001/10/xml-exc-c14n#" />
      <ds:SignatureMethod Algorithm="http://www.w3.org/2001/04/xmldsig-more#rsa-sha256" />
      <ds:Reference URI="#_9c844d84-8117-4851-8270-aeb12e935daf">
      <ds:Transforms>
      <ds:Transform Algorithm="http://www.w3.org/2000/09/xmldsig#enveloped-signature" />
      <ds:Transform Algorithm="http://www.w3.org/2001/10/xml-exc-c14n#" />
      </ds:Transforms>
      <ds:DigestMethod Algorithm="http://www.w3.org/2001/04/xmlenc#sha256" />
      <ds:DigestValue>08HK08VLpJC23JoQs+p+oHbDBvjRF+9NwBeowmlFTrY=</ds:DigestValue>
      </ds:Reference>
      </ds:SignedInfo>
      <ds:SignatureValue>xxxxxxx</ds:SignatureValue>
      <KeyInfo xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/09/xmldsig#">
      <ds:X509Data>
      <ds:X509Certificate>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</ds:X509Certificate>
      </ds:X509Data>
      </KeyInfo>
      </ds:Signature>
      <samlp:Status>
      <samlp:StatusCode Value="urn:oasis:names:tc:SAML:2.0:status:Responder">
      <samlp:StatusCode Value="urn:oasis:names:tc:SAML:2.0:status:NoPassive" />
      </samlp:StatusCode>
      </samlp:Status>
    </samlp:Response>

    Hi Brian,
    I am not sure but you could check below thread and couple of sap note.
    Single Sign On - Sharepoint 2010 to SAP using ADFS
    1799402 - Automatic account creation for SAML 2.0 SP
    1257108 - Collective Note: Analyzing issues with Single Sign On (SSO)
    It may help you to resolve / identify the cause of the issue.
    BR
    AKJ

  • Getting the error while doing PGI for depot delivery

    Hi
    I am getting the below error while doing PGI for Depot delivery. This error is happening only when I taking the materials from stock transfer order which has more than 10 line items. Same issue is not happening when I am taking one material in Stock transfer order in & same material in depot delivery. Please see the screen shots below attachment. I have already maintained no range for the object J_1IDEPINV for year 2014.
    Regards
    PK

    Moved from SAP ERP SD Sales to Internationalization and Unicode.  Please post all your CIN related queries here.  Also ensure that before posting, you made efforts in searching in SCN or Google.  The reason for this indication is the issue you posted has already been discussed many times here and you will get some clue had you searched.
    G. Lakshmipathi

  • - 0 fatal error(s), 3 error(s)     ----------- Payload: Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 5 5.6.0.0 Adobe_Lightroom_x64.msi_5.6 -----------  ERROR: Key not valid for use in specified state.    ERROR: Install MSI payload failed with error: 1603 - Fatal error durin

    I keep getting this error code when trying to download         
    - 0 fatal error(s), 3 error(s) ----------- Payload: Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 5 5.6.0.0 Adobe_Lightroom_x64.msi_5.6 ----------- ERROR: Key not valid for use in specified state. ERROR: Install MSI payload failed with error: 1603 - Fatal error during installation. MSI Error message: Key not valid for use in specified state. ERROR: Third party payload installer Adobe_Lightroom_x64.msi failed with exit code: 1603

    Generally this error happens because of an encrypted folder or insufficient permissions on that folder: http://support.microsoft.com/kb/834484 (MS Explanation)
    Adobe has a page here: Error 1603: A fatal error occurred during installation

  • HT6413 I keep getting a installation pkg error when installing icloud for windows 7 on my pc.

    I keep getting an windows installation error when installing icloud for windows 7.  I have tried installing manually without success.

    There is a very long way which is removing anything related to Apple including stuff in the registry.
    The short way is as follows. It worked for me.
    I have seen that in the forum EXCEPT the registry trick which is missing and does the different.
    1. Remove the Apple account from Outlook.  In my case a me.com account.
    2. Disconnect the connection to ICloud in the control panel of version 3.1.
    REBOOT and open Outlook to see that all traces of the email account and of ICloud are gone.
    3. Uninstall ICloud 3.1. I used REVO Uninstaller in Safe way mode. It removed some stuff in the registry from what I see; but not sure.
    4. Delete as much stuff as possible in the C \Program Files (x86) \Common Files \ Apple
    and C\Program Files\Common Files \Apple.  My computer is 64 bits.
    5. Go to the registry by typing regedit.exe or simply type regedit in the Start Box. Search for ICloud.  I deleted TWO entries related to ICloud. Otherwise, you will still see the ICloud control panel despite the fact that you removed 3.1.
    6. then I was able to install ICloud 4 immediately.  Upon restarting it asked me my email and password and added itseft to Outlook like it was before. Be aware that you address book in Outlook could be deleted, so do an export before.

  • Error when executing statement for table/stored proc  DB2 - Data Truncation

    Hi,
      I have one call sp in XI with n parameters int and two parameters out.
       well, to implement the interface gives the following error
    com.sap.aii.af.ra.ms.api.DeliveryException: Error processing request in sax parser: Error when executing statement for table/stored proc. 'SPSAPAR9' (structure 'Statement'): java.sql.SQLException: The number of parameter values set or registered does not match the number of parameters
    Thanks for your help
    Ximena
    Edited by: Ximena Gonzalez on Feb 19, 2008 11:50 AM
    Edited by: Ximena Gonzalez on Feb 20, 2008 12:17 PM

    My Error is change
    Error while parsing or executing XML-SQL document: Error processing request in sax parser: Error when executing statement for table/stored proc. 'SAPPRG.SPSAPAR9' (structure 'Statement'): java.sql.DataTruncation: Data truncation
    but de change DT SP
    <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
    <ns1:AlistReqDet2_MT xmlns:ns1="urn:proxl:tmuc:proxl01:AlistReqItems">
    <Statement>
    <SPSAPAR9 action="EXECUTE">
      <table>SAPPRG.SPSAPAR9</table>
      <ISAPNU1 isInput="TRUE" type="STRING">0080000353</ISAPNU1>
      <ISAPEM1 isInput="TRUE" type="STRING">'LU'</ISAPEM1>
      <ISAPC05 isInput="TRUE" type="STRING">15353</ISAPC05>
      <ISAPSEC isInput="TRUE" type="STRING">10</ISAPSEC>
      <ISAPLOT isInput="TRUE" type="STRING">'lats'</ISAPLOT>
      <ISAPCA1 isInput="TRUE" type="STRING">10</ISAPCA1>
      <ISAPCA2 isInput="TRUE" type="STRING">10</ISAPCA2>
      <ISAPKIL isInput="TRUE" type="STRING">10</ISAPKIL>
      <ISAPES1 isInput="TRUE" type="STRING">'T'</ISAPES1>
      <ISAPSW isOutput="TRUE" type="STRING" />
      </SPSAPAR9>
      </Statement>
      </ns1:AlistReqDet2_MT>

  • TS1702 I got this error when doing a restore

    I got this error when doing a restore and the restrictions were turned on .  I disabled restrictions and the restore was able to complete.

    The error in itunes had a link to http://support.apple.com/kb/TS1702.  I placed this message here for anyone that might navigate to the same message and would hopefully find this.  Yes turning off restrictions allowed the restore to complete and everyone is now happy.

  • Error when creating interval for number range object

    Hi,
           I am trying to transport my BW stuff from QA to Production and I am getting the following error in the transport logs. The info objects are inactive in RSA1.
    Start of the after-import method RS_IOBJ_AFTER_IMPORT for object type(s) IOBJ (Activation Mode)
    Characteristic YRESD: Error when creating interval for number range object BIM0000396
    Can some body advise me what's wrong? Is something need to be maintained in number ranges?
    Also when I am checking the objects in RSA1, I am getting a message saying "source system WD110 does not exist", WD110 is our dev system. How can I change the source system after transport?
    Thanks.
    Edited by: Raj G on Mar 20, 2008 11:38 AM

    Also when I am checking the objects in RSA1, I am getting a message saying "source system WD110 does not exist", WD110 is our dev system. How can I change the source system after transport?
    Which system are you checking this?
    refer: Re: Transport Source Systems from DEV to Testing for step to map the source systems for transport

Maybe you are looking for