ESB- Licensing issues and etc

Hi All,
I was wondering if i could have a few of my doubts cleared
1. According to my understanding since EDI requires licensing and certification, If i use ESB and make it transform the document to some other format. Then if i can post the same document through some 3rd party software whose only function is to post to a particular OXTA or HTTP URL for example.
Will there be any legal issues here ?
2. Where can i find a list of possible transformation which ESB supports. (cXML,OAG,EDI,Rossatenet, UBL etc)
3. Is there any possible comparision between ESB and B2B in terms of transformations and handling/processing documents?
Cheers
Ravi

ESB delivered with basic adapters, DB, AQ, JMS etc.
If you want to use for Rosettanet,EDI etc you need to buy the relevant adapters.
But ESB should not be used for this purpose as it does not have the relevant security and partner link definition stuff that B2B has, this is why they are two different products.
The adapters are just connection technology.

Similar Messages

Adobe acrobat 9 pro installation/licensing issues

I installed my licensed copy of Acrobat 9 on a new Windows 7 system. Acrobat launched but would not open files and shuts down on attempt. Message is "Licensing for this product has stopped working" with subtext "You cannot use the product at this time. You must repair the problem by uninstalling and then reinstalling this product or contacting your IT administrator or Adobe customer support for help."
I doubt any of you have a solution, so I simply remark on what transpired as a warning and complaint:
1. I went to Adobe databse and found that a patch was provided to correct installations/licensing problems on windows 7. I downloaded it and installed per instructions. It did not resolve the problem.
2. I uninstalled/reinstalled several times. no resolution.
3. I called customer support and was outsourced to someone who knew little and first sent me to a kb article having to do with 'expired licensing' even though I clearly informed them that the message and the fact had nothing to do with expired licenses. They finally referred me to kb405970 on "Licensing has stopped working". I tried all of the applicable solutions (methods 1-6) and none of them worked. Now I will have to wait until tomorrow (though I had pressing work to do today) to contact support again. I fear I will get another outsourced tech who knows little and wastes more of my time. Such is Adobe's way of supporting paid and licensed product users.
I understand and sympathize with Adobe's wishes to protect its products from piracy. However, I expect and paid for a product which works on major and supported operating systems like windows 7. I also understand that if MS or Mac put out a new OS or version, it may require certain adjustments or updates on Adobe's part. What I do not understand (or have patience with) is that 1) Adobe failed to provide a patch that works; 2) that it then sends me to an outsourced customer service tech who didn't have the knowledge to correct the problem and gave me the wrong information to begin with*. What I finally got was the kb article with a series of multi-step instructions for several methods, none of which worked. This is an unprofessional and unethical response to those of us who have paid for our product and expect it to work under reasonable conditions in a supported environment. This is not an acceptable good-faith effort to resolve issues for which Adobe should take full responsibility.
If any of you do happen to have a real solution (or had a similar problem) do let me know....
*The first thing the outsourced tech wished to do was get onto my machine via a remote connection, before anything was tried other than giving them the error message and have them provide me with the wrong information. It became clear that this person had less knowledge than I do (which isn't saying much) and there was no way I was going to permit a clueless techie to crawl around in my machine and fiddle with settings. That is simply asking for trouble. I'm perfectly capable of opening panels and following instructions myself. DC should be the last thing tried; not the first.

Bill, I tried as you suggested - installed every update from 9.1 through 9.3.4. The 'license not working message persists'. The only change was that now Acrobat will not close and must be forced to shut down from the taskbar menu. I appreciate the suggestion though.
Called Adobe (Manila) again, within the hours given on their contact page for installation and licensing issues, and was told "It's Sunday, nobody here can help you". Finally, after an hour of hammering got them to get me a supervisor (their script says to tell the customer there "Is no supervisor available on Sunday" - Finally the "supervisor", Alvin, suggested I need a new serial number and left me on the line while he called someone else to get on. Cameback and informed me that he couldn't get one, I'd have to call Monday (how's that for having solutions?) Result: wasted more time and had more delay on my project.
Conclusion: Adobe has become obsessed and 'piranoic' about piracy and licensing to the extent that they put that first and client/customer needs second (if that). After reading a lot of online 'Adobe Sucks' forums, I'm inclined to believe Adobe is shooting itself in its own foot and is not going to be a reliable method of presentation/document transmission in the future - service and support is an integral part of software and other concerns such as piracy or licensing need to be transparent to legitimate users. Sad that they spend so much time on this, when they need to be fixing real problems. As well, these outsourcing Philipines companies are poor substitutes for good support - they are so scripted and obsessed with regulations over solutions that it is clear that only the most persistent users will get anywhere with them. As a frontline of contact with after-sale clients, they are going to cost Adobe a lot of potential business in the future, whatever their short-term savings. Too bad. Adobe used to be a leader in the market.
Next round: Calling Manila again this am. to be continued...

JMF Licensing Issues

Hello,
I am trying to extend my knowledge of Java into creating a multimedia application that includes a MP3 player however there a few things i would like to enquire about.
Once i have this application completed would i require everyone who wishes to run it to have JMF with the MP3 plugin to be able to run it ?
Can i bundle the JMF jar's along with my application if it were to be a non profit project ?
I am aware that i can use Java Web Start to fetch the required components but i plan to bundle it as a executable JAR and possibly as a Native Code exe.
Please do answer.
Regards,
- FaeLLe
http://www.FaeLLe.com

Because JMF does not support MP3's do to licensing
issues, and cannot play DIVX, I am planning on using
JNI to interface with pre-existing media players (IE:
Windows Media Player/QuickTime/Winamp).Support for mp3 and ogg are among top ten RFEs.
http://bugs.sun.com/bugdatabase/view_bug.do?bug_id=4499904
http://bugs.sun.com/bugdatabase/view_bug.do?bug_id=4479349
And it seems that things are not likely to change in the near future. Perhaps you are better off avoiding Java altogether for this type of app?

REgarding licensing issues involvng 'Computername' and the use of UpperCase4 vs Lowercase Letters

Does any one know if it would cause problems for the Office 365 software license to be displayed as licensed to an ALL CAPS name like 'MY-FAVORITE-PC' but the computer itself shows the computer name to be 'my-favorite-pc"?
If it does, which one should I change? A couple of people here have had this same problem (which usually occurs when they change to using a different PC for their account) I have to Deactivate their Old PC namer and then install the licnse to
their New OC using whatever name it has.
On more than one system, this has resulted in various odd "failure to contact Microsoft server" issues when activating. The problem continues for 7 days and then their copy of Office starts showing reed warning bards and eventually gets totally
unusable.
However, if I uninstall the office, deactivate the license, and reinstall it once again, it install just fine and acts ok but invariably at some point, the same thing occurs.
On one of them I noticed the difference in the case of the letters used in the computer name and the license name. On others I am wondering about various software add ins for Outlook or some other 3rd part application causing the problem. Whatever
it is, it gets extremely annoying. Officer 365 apparently must run an activation sequence almost constantly while Office 2010 (and I presume 2013) ran it once and were done with it.
Searching Google I have found too many possible reasons along with a lot of people who have had the same problems but no one seems to have the 100% solution. This has only started happening since we switched to Office 365 and only
seems to occur on systems that are changed out to different ones with the same User's 365 Account which is in good standing and has 5 available licenses of which only one is in use.
In the case of the caps vs lowercase I also wonder if changing the name to CAPS on their PC would create additional problems on its own?

Hi Questorfla,
For the Office 365 software license issue, I recommend you can post in dedicated Office 365 Forum to get a better response:
http://community.office365.com/en-us/f/148.aspx
If there is anything else regarding this issue, please feel free to post back.
Best Regards,
Anna Wang

T440S to T440s - program and data transfer, OS licensing issue

Hi,
Obviously not able to open these critters up. I have a new T440s that I would like to transfer my programs and data to. Is there a program out there that can do this without having to pull out the hard drive to image?
My current one has Windows 8.1. The new one has Windows 7 with the Windows 8.1 recovery discs. Issue is, I believe that the Windows license is tied to the hardware? Therefore I would have to make a recovery disc set of Windows 7.....then use the Windows 8.1 recovery discs then move my programs and data over.
Windows Easy Transfer does not look like it can do the best job.
I thought about bringing it to the store for them to swap the drives but then worried alot about the whole licensing issue. (not to mention the possible loss of my warranty) Unless if it is done professional and the license could be stripped out of the existing drive and new drive moved to new machine....perhaps a way to get the license keys from the new system somehow.
Thanks in advance.

Hello.
If you look at the bottom of the machines, and they both have the Windows 8 sticker, your machines are licenced and the product key is embedded in the BIOS.
You can use this program: ProduKey to view and write down your keys, but if you use either the Recovery disks or a WIndows 8 Pro retail DVD to reinstall Windows, your key will be picked up automatically by the installation.
For migration of your files, programs and settings, you could simply clone your current WIndows 8.1 installation onto the new drive using, assuming your installation is UEFI and thus your HD is GPT partitioned, Macrium Reflect, which many users here have had a good experience with. That would save you time from having to reinstall Windows on the new machine as well and all you'd have to do is to enter the embedded Windows key of your new machine to activate it.
Macrium Reflect
That's at least one suggestion, but there are many ways to go about this.
Hope this helps.
Cheers!
ThinkPad W540 (20BG) - i7-4800MQ/24GB // ThinkPad T440s (20AQ) - i7-4600U/12GB
ThinkPad T440p (20AW) - i7-4800MQ/16GB // ThinkPad Helix (3698-6EU) - i5-3337U/4GB
ThinkPad W520 (4282-W4Q) - i7-2720QM/32GB // ThinkPad T400 (2767-W1C) - P9500/8GB
ThinkPad T61 (7665-CTO) - T7700/4GB // ThinkPad T60p (8741-C2G) - T7400/4GB

Licensing issue by using Applications AC and PC

Hi,
The SAP GRC 10.0 solution comes as bundled solution for AC, PC and RM. While downloading the SAP GRC 10.0 all the three components are downloaded but in a dormant state.
With the release of GRC 10.0, Access Control and Process Control are offered as an integrated solution, both at the data layer and at the user interface layer. This new unified platform enables increased harmonization of key master data.
GRC 10.0 is a harmonized platform. Although maintenance of data within AC and PC is similar in 10.0 as it was in previous releases, there are some key differences. The following master data is shared between AC and PC for the release 10.0 integration scenario.
u2022 Organizations
u2022 Business Processes
u2022 Business Subprocesses
u2022 Controls
SAP GRC System Add-ons:
Access Control, Process Control and Risk Management are contained in one ABAP add-on u201CGRCFND_Au201D
SAP Backend System Plug-ins:
A. GRCPINW: NW Function Modules hold the AC functions for ERP systems without HR (former non-HR RTA)
B. GRCPIERP: PC relevant features are contained in the plug-in GRCPIERP, for example, for running automated controls and the HR relevant functions for AC (former HR RTA)
There are multiple activation points for AC, PC and RM:
u2022 SAP GRC SPRO -> activate the Application. However
u2022 When we go for the Plug-ins (GRCPIERP) installation in backend systems with HR function module it also brings in the PC relevant features.
u2022 Mitigating Control definition based on Organizations
I had activated the Application AC and PC for some time assuming that PC is required to create the Mitigation Control and Organizations. However I just realized that Mitigating Control and Organization can be created even without Activating PC, which does nothing but removes the additional features of PC.
My Query:
u2022 Kindly let me know if I can still use PC to create and assign Mitigating Control as a shared resource for AC and PC or I have violated Licensing issue by using Applications AC and PC when I am supposed to use just Access Control.
u2022 How is shared resources in SAP GRC 10 dealt in terms of Licensing of Applications in SAP GRC 10.
Thanking you in advance.

all the new pc's we've purchased for a time now, don't have a Win7 CoA product key attached, even though they come with Win7 downgrade rights, so your strategy to use the CoA pkeys for the Win7 install on the new machines might be flawed.
We don't buy HP, and I'm in Australia, so I'm not sure if this will be the same for you.
Also, the OEM image that you would use to re-deploy/re-image with, may need to be different for varying models (OEMs might include different drivers, or other checks or blockers, in their image and OOBE scripts), and, the embedded OEM "master" product key/certificate
could vary (or not align) across model types/generations.
Ours do have the SLIC table in firmware and the OA markers, and we use VL Win7 Enterprise anyway, so our 40,000 machine fleet means VL and Software Assurance as a part of our EA + Select is an (expensive) no-brainer really.
The other thought I have for you, is the re-imaging rights that are bestowed when you have a VL agreement (and therefore, are not bestowed if you don't have one). Because we do have a VL agreement, I've never dived into how it might be worked if we didn't
have VL.
http://www.microsoft.com/licensing/about-licensing/briefs/reimaging.aspx
http://www.microsoft.com/licensing/about-licensing/briefs/downgrade-rights.aspx
If you do look at a VL agreement, I'm told they start from as few as 5 machines. And, if you purchase new pc's, you have the option to enrol the new pc's into Software
Assurance within 90days of purchase, which I imagine would save you some cost, compared to attaching SA to them at a later time, presumably requiring you to pay full ticket price for that.
I'd recommend you get some advice from an MS reseller, even if only to work out what the various options/costs might be.
Don
(Please take a moment to "Vote as Helpful" and/or "Mark as Answer", where applicable.
This helps the community, keeps the forums tidy, and recognises useful contributions. Thanks!)

ESB WSDL generation and compatibility issues

Hi all.
I have a need to integrate Oracle ESB with TIBCO, and I'm facing some issues regarding the use of namespaces in WSDL.
In ESB, when I create a routing service, its corresponding WSDL has a targetNamespace attribute, for example, http://www.oracle.com/myRS
When I deploy this routing service using the "Invokable from external services" property checked, ESB automatically generates another WSDL, which contains the SOAP and ESB bindings and imports the previous WSDL. This WSDL's targetNamespace has the same value of the targetNamespace from the previous WSDL (http://www.oracle.com/myRS)
When TIBCO needs to consume the ESB web service ( the automatically generated one), it's complaining that the two WSDLs have the same targetNamespace, and they shouldn't (according to them).
Here's is an example:
1 - I create a routing service. It's WSDL looks like this:
<definitions name="TIBCOIntegrationRS" targetNamespace="http://oracle.com/esb/namespaces/TIBCOIntegration" xmlns="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/wsdl/" xmlns:tns="http://oracle.com/esb/namespaces/TIBCOIntegration" xmlns:inp1="http://xmlns.oracle.com/pcbpel/adapter/db/top/CvrdRaCustomersIFace">
<types>
<schema xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema">
<import namespace="http://xmlns.oracle.com/pcbpel/adapter/db/top/CvrdRaCustomersIFace" schemaLocation="CvrdRaCustomersIFace_table.xsd"/>
</schema>
</types>
<message name="CvrdRaCustomersIface_request">
<part name="CvrdRaCustomersIface" element="inp1:CvrdRaCustomersIface"/>
</message>
<portType name="execute_ppt">
<operation name="execute">
<input message="tns:CvrdRaCustomersIface_request"/>
</operation>
</portType>
</definitions>
2 - I deploy the routing service, and get another WSDL that is automatically generated:
<definitions xmlns="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/wsdl/" xmlns:plt="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/ws/2003/05/partner-link/" xmlns:soap="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/wsdl/" xmlns:xs="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema" xmlns:wsdl="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/wsdl/" xmlns:import="http://oracle.com/esb/namespaces/TIBCOIntegration" xmlns:http="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/wsdl/http/" xmlns:esb="http://www.oracle.com/esb/" xmlns:ws="http://www.example.com/webservice" xmlns:tns="http://oracle.com/esb/namespaces/TIBCOIntegration" targetNamespace="http://oracle.com/esb/namespaces/TIBCOIntegration">
<import namespace="http://oracle.com/esb/namespaces/TIBCOIntegration" location="http://denis:80/esb/slide/ESB_Projects/DadosCliente_TIBCOIntegrationESB/TIBCOIntegration_TIBCOIntegrationRS.wsdl"/>
<portType name="execute_ppt">
<operation name="execute">
<input message="tns:CvrdRaCustomersIface_request"/>
</operation>
</portType>
<binding name="__esb_TIBCOIntegrationRS_execute_ppt" type="tns:execute_ppt">
<esb:binding/>
<operation name="execute">
<esb:operation event-name="TIBCOIntegration.TIBCOIntegrationRS.execute"/>
<input/>
</operation>
</binding>
<binding name="__soap_TIBCOIntegrationRS_execute_ppt" type="tns:execute_ppt">
<soap:binding xmlns:soap="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/wsdl/soap/" style="document" transport="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/http"/>
<operation name="execute">
<soap:operation xmlns:soap="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/wsdl/soap/" style="document" soapAction="execute"/>
<input>
<soap:body xmlns:soap="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/wsdl/soap/" use="literal"/>
</input>
</operation>
</binding>
<service name="ESB_TIBCOIntegrationRS_Service">
<port name="__soap_TIBCOIntegrationRS_execute_ppt" binding="tns:__soap_TIBCOIntegrationRS_execute_ppt">
<soap:address xmlns:soap="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/wsdl/soap/" location="http://denis:80/event/TIBCOIntegration/TIBCOIntegrationRS"/>
</port>
<port name="__esb_TIBCOIntegrationRS_execute_ppt" binding="tns:__esb_TIBCOIntegrationRS_execute_ppt">
</port>
</service>
<plt:partnerLinkType name="execute_pptLT">
<plt:role name="execute_pptProvider">
<plt:portType name="tns:execute_ppt"/>
</plt:role>
</plt:partnerLinkType>
</definitions>
3 - We can see that both WSDLs have the same targetNamespace, and that's what TIBCO is complaining about.
I've been reading the W3C WSDL spec (2.0), and found a note regarding the use of the import clause in WSDL:
http://www.w3.org/TR/2007/REC-wsdl20-20070626/#import_namespace_attribute
It has the following fragment:
"The namespace attribute information item is of type xs:anyURI. Its actual value indicates that the containing WSDL 2.0 document MAY contain qualified references to WSDL 2.0 components in that namespace (via one or more prefixes declared with namespace declarations in the normal way). This value MUST NOT match the actual value of targetNamespace attribute information item in the enclosing WSDL 2.0 document"
I don't know if ESB is currently working with WSDL 2.0 specification. I's mentioned here just for a comparison.
So, the question is: Is it allowed and W3C compatible to use the same targetNamespace in the enclosing WSDL as well as in the imported one?
thanks
Denis
Message was edited by:
[email protected]
Message was edited by:
[email protected]

Hi ,
This is Shobana K from PeopleTools.
I am also facing a similar issue.
The ESB services exposed for external invocation are nested wsdls meaning one WSDL imports another.
Consider this nested WSDL for example-
http://10.176.162.55:8888/esb/wsil/NestedESB_synchronous/NestedSynch_RS?wsdl
Above wsdl corresponds to the base wsdl containing the binding and service information. This in turn imports another WSDL http://10.176.162.55:8888/esb/slide/ESB_Projects/8.50_ESB_Nested_wsdl_NestedESB_synchronous/NestedESB_synchronous_NestedSynch_RS.wsdl
which contains port type, message and schema information. These wsdls are formed in accordance to the "import authoring style" defined in 2.1.2 section of the WSDL1.1 specification.
The authoring style used in ESB wsdl is exactly the same as the one shown in the WSDL spec but for one point.
In case of ESB, both the wsdls(base as well as the imported one) have the same target namespace. Is it possible for 2 wsdls to have the same target namespace within the same scope?
In order to parse the WSDL for the required information, we need to look at the information both in the base wsdl as well as the imported wsdl. While trying to locate the correct information in the right wsdl, we make use of the namespace value used with the element name. For e.g, the base wsdl may only be containing the binding information. This in turn will refer to the port type information available in the imported wsdl. Now, while parsing, we make use of the namespace value associated with the port type element name in the base wsdl.Based on the namespace value, we decide which wsdl contains this information.
In the sample nested ESB wsdl that I have quoted above http://10.176.162.55:8888/esb/slide/ESB_Projects/8.50_ESB_Nested_wsdl_NestedESB_synchronous/NestedESB_synchronous_NestedSynch_RS.wsdl, the tns(this namespace) value associated with the port type element corresponds to the target namespace value in both the wsdls and the value happens to be the same. Hence while parsing, when we look for the port type and message information belonging to the "tns" namespace, we tend to search for those information only in the base wsdl and not the imported one.This sounds logical and it would have worked had the target namespace been different for the 2 wsdls. It fails in this case because both the WSDLs have the same target namespace. In such cases, how should we go about parsing the wsdl?
Your inputs and feedback will be greatly appreciated.
Thanks a lot in advance.
Regards,
Shobana K

I've read others' posts on this issue and still need an answer that works. Safari keeps dropping wireless; no issues on a Dell laptop with XP in same room. Cleared cache, etc. - any other ideas?

I've read others' posts on this issue and still don't have an answer that works! Safari keeps dropping wireless connection every 5 - 10 minutes (it's gotten progressively worse over the last month). My husband, sitting 10 ft across from me, has no issues on a Dell laptop with XP so doesn't appear to be the router or ISP. Safari v5.0.6 Mac OS 10.5.8. Cleared cache, tried kill commands in Terminal, restarts, etc. Only restarting seems to keep it at bay for a period, but then it will start again. Any other ideas?

You posted a question about a problem connecting a Mac to a wireless router. You have an old Dell laptop that works well with that router.
I pointed you to a brief discussion with another poster who had a problem connecting a Mac to a wireless router. He had an old Dell laptop that worked well with that router. I suggested he upgrade the router firmware. He upgraded it, and the problem was solved. Another poster in that thread did the same thing, and his problem was also solved. Within the last day or two, I made the same suggestion to a third poster in another thread, and his problem was solved too.
Conclusion: Upgrading the router firmware helps sometimes.
If I understand your response, you think that checking for a firmware update isn't even worth a try. Am I missing something?

My free trial has expired a week into the trial. I have contacted support and they haven't solved the issue. Stated to use forum to solve my license issue for this computer.

My free trial has expired a week into the trial. I have contacted support and they haven't solved the issue. Stated to use forum to solve my license issue for this computer.

Did you have an Adobe trial running on this same computer before? Maybe your previous trial was used for 3 weeks and then you uninstalled it? If so, you're only eligible for a 1 week trial on this computer.
Nancy O.

DataGuard and EM licensing issue

Hi,
Anyone can tell me, if I setup a standby server using DATA Guard, how many user licenses should I purchase for the standby server?
For the tuning pack, configuratin pack for EM, if only one dba access the EM dbcontrol website, how many user license should I purchase?
Thanks

Hi,
Anyone can tell me, if I setup a standby server using
DATA Guard, how many user licenses should I purchase
for the standby server?
The only legal response to this comes from ORacle. You need to get a quotable Oracle source to give you an answer.
One such source is at http://www.oracle.com/corporate/pricing/specialtopics.html
For the tuning pack, configuratin pack for EM, if
only one dba access the EM dbcontrol website, how
many user license should I purchase?
Same answer as above.
That said, in the docs on the site referenced above, as well as in the Licensing docs for the database, Oracle states the EM Packs must be licensed to the same level as the database being managed, regardless of the number of people using the pack ... 2 CPU database license means 2 CPU Diag Pack license.
And that makes a peculiar kind of sense - the use of the pack benefits ALL the DB users, not just the DBA using the pack.

ESB METADATA ISSUES WHILE DEPLOYING ESB SERVICE GROUPS AND SERVICES

Customer has SOA Suite 10.1.3.4 with MLR#8.
We have 2 separate SOA based integrations being shipped to the customer which
he can install together. The 2 integrations share a ESB service group called
"EBS" under which some ESb services are registered.
One of the integration was installed/deployed on the SOA server successfully
and the services were running successfully.
When the second integration was installed, it gave some errors while
deploying/registering the common ESB service group and the ESB services under
it.
<error code="1067" severity="5">
<description>Already esb metadata is getting modified by {0}.Concurrent
modification of esb metadata is not allowed.</description>
<fix>Please try after sometime.If Error Persists, Contact Oracle
Support</fix>
</error>
The customer tried bouncing the SOA server and the SOA db as well before
re-trying but no help.
Any pointers ?
Thanks.

i would recommend delete and recreate the ESB Components.
R u using some scripts to create it or is it manually from ESB Console ?

Licensing Issue Quality Management 9.0 with UCCX 8.5

Hi guys,
The UCCX compatibility matrix, Cisco WFO System config Guide plus QM 9.0 installation guide all state QM9.0 is compatible with UCCX 8.5(SU3).
We have ordered QM9.0 licenses using part number
L-CCX-90-QM-L-K9=:L-CCX-90-QM-L-K9= : CCX 9.0 Quality Manager Server , 10 Seats LICENSE ONLY
I am unable to add these licenses to our UCCX server as I am getting:
Error: The Cisco Unified CCX Quality Manager Seat feature (2nd line) of xxxxx.lic has unsupported version number (9.0)
Has anyone installed QM9.0 with UCCX 8.5 and if so what licenses did you have to purchase?
Thanks!

I have not done this yet, I was looking into getting the license to do same you are doing. Thanks for the heads up. I will wait to see outcome of your attempt.
My main drive to go to 9.x is to get IE9 32 bit support with the latest 9.x SR as I have a handful of supervisors who have Windows 7 and using it to play back recordings, etc and I'm tired of the compatibility issues and time spent on their PCs to keep it running after they do other updates, etc. Was hoping 9.x with the IE9 and 32 bit support would help with those headaches.

Have the Adobe Muse CC (2014) licensing issues been resolved?

Have the Adobe Muse CC (2014) licensing issues been resolved?
I am patiently waiting for some word on whether I can go ahead a install the new version of Muse CC (2014) software on my systems without running into the quagmire that so many are experiencing. I simply can't afford to run the risk that I will be stuck with a "trial version" for the next 30 days without some assurance from Adobe that they will be able to solve the problems in that time frame. It would be nice if adobe would send out an email that explains the situation to all of it's users so we know what's going on and when the issue is resolved. Collectively we all pay a lot money for these "updates", so I don't think it's to much to ask.
Kind Regards,
wrgould
PS: Please reference this forum discussion - Muse CC 2014 wants Serial Number, though i pay monthly for muse

A screenshot of the error when a site is opened. I've reinstalled, restarted.. etc. Thanks! J

Adobe CS3 Licensing Issue

I have Vista Business, Adobe CS3 with student licensing. It has worked great for three months. Now I'm back in school and I get an error that says "Licensing for this product has stopped working:". It is registered.
I've followed all of the fixes listed here and it still will not work. I have emailed support and they gave me the same fixes as here. Someone must know how to fix it, it's their software.
I tried to uninstall but all I get is the Install Wizard. I went through it once, inserted the disk and waited patiently. I have rebooted each and every time I've made changes. NOTHING WORKS!. I can't even unistall it, that is strange.
Does someone have another method of getting this going again. I have assignments due and it has really caused me a lot of stress.
Thanks for the help,
Paul

Here are a few snippets that get posted often when people are
having
problems installing:
See if this TechNote helps:
Error "Some problems occurred during installation",
"Component install
failed", or "Shared components failed to install" (Adobe
Creative Suite 3)
http://www.adobe.com/go/kb401401
More tech notes to check out:
Error "Installing Adobe Photoshop CS3 results in a conflict
with Adobe
Photoshop CS3" when you install Creative Suite 3 or Photoshop
CS3
http://www.adobe.com/go/kb401551
Remove Creative Suite 3 and CS3 point products from Windows
XP, Windows
Vista and Mac OS
http://www.adobe.com/go/kb401090
If these doesn't help, please open an official Adobe
Technical Support case
and we can help you get the trial version installed:
http://www.adobe.com/support/contact/
Nadia
Adobe® Community Expert : Dreamweaver
CSS Templates |Tutorials |SEO Articles
http://www.DreamweaverResources.com
~ Customisation Service Available ~
http://www.csstemplates.com.au
"Sloth_Boy" <[email protected]> wrote in
message
news:f52jh5$5f2$[email protected]..
> The title pretty much sums it up. Basically, whenever I
run setup.exe of
> any of
> the CS3 applications on my system (photoshop CS3,
dreamweaver CS3.etc) the
> setup loads and then nothing happens. The setup.exe
process is in the
> memory
> but it doesn't do anything and doesn't return any errors
at all. This
> happens
> both when I try to install and/or uninstall CS3
applications. I have a
> feeling
> it's to do with some sort of licensing issue as I
received an error in
> Dreamweaver saying to reinstall the application due to a
licensing issue.

SAP License Audit and DDIC user

Hello, we recently completed our first SAP License Audit and an issue came up with our DDIC user in the productive client. According to the SAP Licensing and Auditing documentation DDIC is not counted in clients 000 and 001, however we have DDIC in client 400 (our productive client) and I set it as a SAP Web AS User in the Contractual User Type. However, we should not have to pay for a standard SAP user and I was going to remove DDIC from client 400, but I see it's needed for transports.
How can I assign DDIC a user type that does not consume a SAP License?
- Regards,
Richard

Hi Richard,
You don't need to and should not remove DDIC and SAP* from your productive client.
As Nick mentioned already, please assign License type 'Test' to the standard users SAP*, DDIC etc in your productive client (400).
When the users are defined with 'TEST' license type, they will not be measured in System License Audit report.
Cheers !!
Satya.
PS: Points always encourage me to reply...

ESB- Licensing issues and etc

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for