EText - Multiple elements in the same record

I was wondering if it is possible to put multiple elements within a single record using eText. For example
<SELECTION>
<CRITERIA>
<INVOICE>INV_NUM1</INVOICE>
<INVOICE>INV_NUM2</INVOICE>
<INVOICE>INV_NUM3</INVOICE>
<INVOICE>INV_NUM4</INVOICE>
</CRITERIA>
</SELECTION>
Produces the following output
INV_NUM1 INV_NUM2 INV_NUM3
INV_NUM4

<NEW RECORD>     FILE_HEADER
1     25     Alpha     R, ‘ ‘     Invoice[1] || Invoice[3]|| Invoice_number
26     25     Alpha     R, ‘ ‘     Invoice[2]
51     25     Alpha     R, ‘ ‘     Invoice[3]
You are in the record FILE_HEADER and at level <LEVEL>     Invoice.
so any element is accessible under or above is available , like above Invoice_number is accessible if that is available under <INVOICE>

Similar Messages

Design multiple elements in the same row

hi,
i am new to web dynpro java. how to design multiple elements in the same row. ie a textfield and inputfield in the same row in form design layout.
thanx

Hi Viral Patel,
To design multiple elements in the same row. Follow below Steps
1.) Open your View --> Select Layout Tab --> In the Outline Explorer --> There will be a Default " RootUIElementContainer " --> Select it --> Right Click & Select Insert Child Option --> A new Window appears --> Select TransparenContainer & Press Finish --> Now Select TransparentContainer --> Right Click & Select Insert Child Option --> Add TextView and Press Finish --> Similarly add InputField to the newly added TransparentContainer.
---> Now to add above two UI Elements in the same row in form design layout --> Select Newly added TransparentContainer --> In the Properties Change layout Property to GridLayout & set colCount --> 2 .
It will make the above two UI Elements in the same Row
With Regards,
Roop Kumar.

Multiple User Accessing the same record issue

I am planning to design an app where we have the following use case requirement.
If a user who is logged into the system is accessing a record(plan in this case) anyone else who is logged into the system at the same time should be locked out of that same plan but should still be able to access other plans in the system. A plan has many things associated with it so the 2nd user should be locked out of everything associated to the plan being accessed by the first user.
What is the best way to implement this at the application or the database level?
Here are some options we have been bouncing around.
1. When the first user logs in and accesses the first plan we lock the plan at the app level using a singleton class which has one and only one instance on the app server. The plan_id can be put as an entry into a hashtable which can be in the session and is created if one does not exist. When the 2nd user tries to access the same plan, since the plan_id is still in the hashtable he would be locked out. However we somehow need to timeout the first user after 30 mts of inactivity or so so that others can access the plan and are not locked out for ever if the first user walks away from his PC or does not close his browser, thus keeping his session alive indefinitely.
2. In the database in the plan table we add a column for 'locked'. When the first entry is created in the plan table locked column is marked as 'yes' or 1 and when the user closes the browser we use some javascript to trigger an event which changes that 'yes' or 1 to 'no' or 0 thus unlocking the plan. However the big issue we see in this concept is that we will have to put a javascript onUnload method in all jsp pages in the app because the user could be anywhere in the app after starting his plan access after login.
Conceptually the 2 options are the same but one is done at the app whereas the other is at the database level.
Is there a better way to handle this scenario using transactions or some other technological option.
Thanks

Another solution involving no modification of the database structure:
As soon as a user want to access a plan, try to UPDATE the plan record... if it fails, the record was locked
by another user before. When the user has finished with the plan, you can COMMIT or ROLLBACK the changes, which will free the lock for other users.
An advantage of this solution is that if program crashes unexpectedly, there will automatically be a ROLLBACK.
Of course, you need a transaction for this... and perhaps more if you want to separate the 'locking transaction' (virtual update just for restricting access) from the 'operating transaction' (in which you will
do the DB stuff: inserts, updates, deletes, etc.)
Hope this helped,
Regards.

How to import multiple elements into the same line in structure Framemaker (i.e. no carriage return between elements).

I have a successful import process going now (DTD, EDD, ReadWriteRules, and Template) that imports a number of elements, but each onto a separate line. I now need to import three elements in a row on a single line. How do I set up to do that?

Dear Wild,
A container element a structured document can either be a paragraph element, that contains one or more complete FrameMaker paragraphs (elements corresponding to chapters, titles, and list items, for instance, are typically paragraph elements), or a text range element, with content that comprises part of a paragraph. An EDD doesn't need to identify paragraph elements since containers are paragraphs by default. You make an element a text range with a text format rule that specifies TextRangeFormatting.
In your case, if you have a wrapper element that contains the three elements you want to appear on a single line, in the EDD, add a text format rule for the three inline elements that specifies TextRangeFormatting; specify the formatting of the overall paragraph in the element definition for the wrapper. If you don't have a wrapper, though, the overall paragraph will inherit formatting from whatever the containing element is; the containing element may be the document's root element or a major division such as a chapter or section. If that element's formatting is not what you want here, you can leave the "inline" elements as separate paragraph so that you can specify their formatting, but make the first two run-in heads (which is done in the Placement property of the pagination properties).
--Lynne

Transaction across multiple databases in the same BDB environment

Hi,
I have multiple databases and one metadata database all in the same BDB environment. At runtime I want to create an additional database, update this database and update the metadata database in the same environment under one transaction. Are there any issues in having transactions that span multiple databases in the same environment?
Thanks,
Pooja

There is virtually no difference between using multiple databases and a single database in a transaction. Concurrency is determined by other factors such as whether multiple threads access the same records. See the Writing Transactional Applications for more information:
http://www.oracle.com/technology/documentation/berkeley-db/je/TransactionGettingStarted/index.html
--mark

In Elements 7.0, how can I delete multiple photos at the same time?

In Adobe Photoshop Elements 7.0, how can I delete multiple photos at the same time? Please be a little specific so I can follow your instructions as I'm not real smart at computers; I'm an intermediate user. Thank you.

Shift-click the photos or Ctrl-click them to select them, then right-click one of them and choose Delete from Catalog. They will all go together.

Map several records to different elements in the same xml node

Hi,
I am trying to map data from relational tables to elements as per my xml schema. One of my tables has several records that I need to map to different elements in the same xml node.
For example:
Customer_Id | Param_Id |Param_Name
212 | 1 |State
212 | 2 |Country
212 | 3 |ZipCode
I can not change the structure of this existing table and need to work with it.
How do I map the different params for a specific customer to my Customer node in the schema?
One option is to join on the parameters table several times, but there ought to be a better way!
PLEASE HELP!!!
Thanks,

First I question the design that contains/allows 600 attributes on an element. They sound like they really should be elements in the XML.
Regardless, the following (NOT TESTED) should work for you (assuming you want to write one SQL with 600 columns)
CREATE OR REPLACE VIEW APPLICATION_XML
OF XMLTYPE
Element "LOAN_APPLICATION"
with object ID
substr(extractValue(object_value,'/LOAN_APPLICATION/APPLICATION_DATA/@CallID'),1,5)
AS
WITH parm_tb AS
SELECT MAX(DECODE(prv_valu, 1, prv_value)) BusinessType,
       MAX(DECODE(param_id, 2, prv_value)) Product,
       MAX(DECODE(param_id, 3, prv_value)) SomethingElse
FROM parameter_details
WHERE prv_pmh_header_id = 1
SELECT xmlElement
   ("APPLICATION_DATA",
     xmlAttributes
      p.prv_detail_id as "CallID",
      p.PRV_PRM_PARAM_ID as "RandomID",
      p.prv_value as AppInitDate
     xmlElement
     ("PRODUCER_DATA",
       xmlAttributes
        parm_tb.BusinessType as "BusinessType" ,
        parm_tb.Product as "Product"
FROM parameters_table p
WHERE p.PRV_PMH_HEADER_ID = 1

Trying Multiple File Uploads for the same record

Okay I"m trying to upload 3 images on a form that will go
into my gallery. Image types are jpg,gif,eps. What I've got to work
so far is for all three images to upload to my server which is
great, However when I look into my table, all three images are the
eps image. What's wrong with this code? Again I don't won't
separate records, just the ability to load 3 different images in
the same record in my table. See code below

The FILE.ServerFile variable is only going to contain the
information from the most recent <cffile> call.

Multiple Users accessing the same core set of queried data

Hi. We have a small call center and we want to build an app where the users can query the same core set of data and use it to initiate calls to study participants. The trick is that they will also need to update each record with information from the call. So we need to stop two call center agents from potentially calling the same participant at the same time.
Is there a good method or best practice for creating a app to do this? The concern is that multiple call center agents would be querying the screen with the same core set of records (for example, querying by 'Ready for Call' status). When a call is placed the agent will have a conversation with the participant and ultimately end up updating the record after about 10 minutes. So my question is whether there is a good way to keep multiple agents from working with the same record (e.g. calling the same participant simultaneously)?
Right now it seems that Oracle will lock a record for update, but only after an agent has initiated a change to the record. This still leaves a window of opportunity for two or more agents to be calling the same participant at the same time.
Any thoughts or ideas on this would be greatly appreciated. Thanks so much.

By 'standard record locking system' do you mean there is nothing I need to do programatically? No block level properties to change?
So you are saying this is just the way it always works. So as soon as one of our call center agents opens a record all I have to do is create a pending update to any field?
But won't another user be able to open the form and just query that record not knowing another user has it open?

Multiple DEVL_PROJECT_ID for the same model in CZ_DEVL_PROJECTS Table.

Hi,
Did anyone came across this issue!! I am triggering the config engine from back and and trying to pick up a model but it has multiple devl_project_id's. :(
I could see multiple DEVL_PROJECT_ID for the same model in CZ_DEVL_PROJECTS Table. Apart from DEVL_PROJECT_ID and created_by_date every thing looks the same.
Below are the 2 records the data from the table
select * from CZ.CZ_DEVL_PROJECTS where product_key = '122:17056' and DEVL_PROJECT_ID in (12943,15321)
DEVL_PROJECT_ID     NAME     ORIG_SYS_REF     CREATION_DATE     LAST_UPDATE_DATE     PERSISTENT_PROJECT_ID     MODEL_TYPE
12943     ASI XXX MODEL(122 17056)     OPTIONAL:122:17056     12/18/2012 10:01     12/18/2012 10:01     11100     A
PRODUCT_KEY     ORGANIZATION_ID     INVENTORY_ITEM_ID     BOM_CAPTION_RULE_ID     NONBOM_CAPTION_RULE_ID
122:17056     122     17056     802     801
15321     ASI XXX MODEL(122 17056)     OPTIONAL:122:17056     12/26/2012 23:10     12/26/2012 23:10     11100     A
122:17056     122     17056     802     801
Thanks in advance,
-vijay

It can be possible to have multiple devl_project_id for the same model in cz_devl_projects Table.
Case -1 : When you delete the existing model and re-import again.
case 2:
When you publish the model locally, it will create the same copy of the record with different devl_project_id, creation_date, last update_date etc..\
You can see that for published records the last_updat_login, checkout_user will be null and for the original model, last_update_login,checkout_user (if model is locked) will not be null.
-Murali
Edited by: 907569 on Jan 8, 2013 10:55 AM

CLR trigger - handling multiple inserts at the same time

Hi
I've developed a CLR trigger which operates on inserts performed on a staging table. The trigger implements some business logic and then inserts or updates a record in a target table. Whether an insert or update is performed depends on whether
a record with the same ID already exists in the target (i.e. a select * from target where ID = 123).
This works fine in most scenarios, but occasionally I am getting duplicates in the target table and have noticed that this seems to occur when inserts on the staging table happen at exactly the same time (i.e. multiple inserts for the same ID at
the same time). In this situation duplicates are created in the target table because at the time of the inserts, no record with that ID exists in the target table (i.e. the select returns no records), therefore a new record is created for each.
Is there a known way to deal with this scenario? For example, would locking the target table on insert result in the subsequent selects against the target table waiting until the target table had been updated, therefore the select would return a record
for the given ID.
I didn't really want to lock the whole target table on insert, because there are potentially other users reading that table (selects) and these would also have to wait for the insert to complete.
I'd appreciate any thoughts on how to deal with this and avoid duplicates in the target table. I'm unable to change the way the data is coming in to the staging table, so my trigger code must deal with the above scenario.
Thanks in advance.
John

First if you do not want any duplicate values in a column (or combination of columns) you should add a constraint to ensure this is never possible. A
unique index
like this should do this trick.
CREATE UNIQUE NONCLUSTERED INDEX [IX_yourIndexName] ON [dbo].[YourTableName]
[yourColumn1] ASC,
-- add more columns that make the unique combination that you don't want repeated
You can then add a try/catch block in your trigger code, if you get an exception based on this index then the record was created by another executing instance of this trigger and in that case you should do an update (or not, not sure what the rest of your
logic is) in your catch block. This is the easiest solution and does not involve table locks. The only drawback is the first one to commit the insert will win and you have no guarantee which process or data set that will be. Also i have no idea how big the
table is, how frequently changes are made, and what the data type is so you should
keep this in mind when creating your index so you don't run into unexpected high index fragmentation which can lead to performance problems when executing updates and inserts.
You could also create a
named transaction with scope serializable around your insert/update block and execute your reads using a
NOLOCK hint
which should allow them to retrieve uncommitted writes and not create a long wait. The downside is is that the data might not be 100% accurate depending on if a transaction fails or not if there happens to be an update at the same time as a select but maybe
this is not a big deal to the calling code.
-Igor

Multiple Browsers with the same Page Flow

I have a legacy application that I am working on migrating to Weblogic. The
legacy application allowed the user to have multiple windows of the same
module open at the same time. Users found this useful if they wanted to look
at two different records in the same module. For example, if you had a
registration app and you wanted to look at Joe's registration information
and Sue's registration. Is it possible to have two browsers within the same
session open and pointing to the same RegistrationController.jpf?
Thank You.
Michelle

I believe our problem is that our form beans are class members of the page
flow thus when you open another instance of the same controller the form
beans are overwritten. Our GUI is displayed as modules containing multiple
tabs with a form bean for each tab. The module has a controller, signifying
the page flow for the module. So, one record in a module will span multiple
tabs. We did not want to have one big form bean that is why we multiple
form beans. But it now looks like we will need to store these form beans
perhaps to the session in a collection identified by the window instance
they belong to.
We also need to do multiple different page flows but I don't think nested
page flows will not work here because the page flows would almost need to be
nested of each other. I guess you could almost think of as each module is
an independent application however some can be invoked by others.
<Rich Feit> wrote in message news:[email protected]..
Hi Michelle,
Yes, that should be just fine. That page flow will remain the "current
page flow" as requests from both browser windows hit it. The NetUI
runtime synchronizes the action methods, so you don't need to worry about
thread-safety within them.
There's also a way to have multiple different active page flows at the
same time, but in this case you don't need to do anything special.
Rich

Loading multiple instances of the same loader

Hello everyone,
I am trying to load in 5 pictures but 2 of those pictures need to be added multiple times to the same scene. For example you would use Loader to load one tree but would show that tree 9 times. The problem I am experiencing is that each object loads fine once but objects that are the same with different x and y values are placed at the last location that was set in the loop.
            for(var i=0; i < LoadedXml.resources.resource.(@type==LoadedXml.resources.resource.@type[fileCount]).@coun t; i++)
                sprite.name = LoadedXml.resources.resource.@type[fileCount] + i;
                sprite.x = LoadedXml.objects.object.(@type==LoadedXml.resources.resource.@type[fileCount] && @instance == i).@x;
                sprite.y = LoadedXml.objects.object.(@type==LoadedXml.resources.resource.@type[fileCount] && @instance == i).@y;
                table.push(sprite);
this code sets the properties but say the count is equal to 9 and the last x and y set is 20 , 20. Then all of the objects are placed at 20,20. Even though they are clearly placed in there own element within the array. If anyone can help please please do it.
Dexter

then your xml parsing is faulty.

Deploy multiple instances of the same stateless session EJB

I have a stateless session bean.
The methods on the bean operate against DB tables.
Q: Can I deploy multiple instances of the same stateless session bean, but specify a different JNDI/datasource name in the deployment descriptor?
The method calls are all enclosed within a single invocation, just that I need to hit different databases (all with the same schema), and Id like to be able to lookup the EJB via a different JNDI name, and have the exact same functionality, just against different deployed datasources.
Does the spec allow/support this?
If not, any suggestions as to how to achieve this sort of functionality?
Im using JBoss 3.2.1 on Solaris, so Im not sure whether or not this is a JBoss "issue" or a limitation of the EJB Spec (or me being just plain wrong and trying to do something the "wrong way")
Nick

I have a stateless session bean.
The methods on the bean operate against DB tables.
Q: Can I deploy multiple instances of the same
stateless session bean, but specify a different
JNDI/datasource name in the deployment descriptor?
The method calls are all enclosed within a single
invocation, just that I need to hit different
databases (all with the same schema), and Id like to
be able to lookup the EJB via a different JNDI name,
and have the exact same functionality, just against
different deployed datasources.
Does the spec allow/support this?
If not, any suggestions as to how to achieve this sort
of functionality?
Im using JBoss 3.2.1 on Solaris, so Im not sure
whether or not this is a JBoss "issue" or a limitation
of the EJB Spec (or me being just plain wrong and
trying to do something the "wrong way")
NickI haven't done it but judging from the deployment descriptors yes.
For example if I have two bounded datasources java:/Database1 and java:/Database2
Lets say I have a session bean called MySession, then in your ejb-jar.xml you would have (notice that the desc, display, and ejb-name are the only differences)
<session>
<description>MySessionAlpha</description>
<display-name>MySessionAlpha</display-name>
<ejb-name>MySessionAlpha</ejb-name>
<home>com.mycorp.MySessionRemoteHome</home>
<remote>com.mycorp.MySessionRemote</remote>
<local-home>com.mycorp.MySessionLocalHome</local-home>
<local>com.mycorp.MySessionLocal</local>
<ejb-class>com.mycorp.MySessionFacadeBean</ejb-class>
<session-type>Stateless</session-type>
<transaction-type>Container</transaction-type>
<resource-ref>
<res-ref-name>jdbc/DataSource</res-ref-name>
<res-type>javax.sql.DataSource</res-type>
<res-auth>Container</res-auth>
</resource-ref>
</session>
<session>
<description>MySessionBeta</description>
<display-name>MySessionBeta</display-name>
<ejb-name>MySessionBeta</ejb-name>
<home>com.mycorp.MySessionRemoteHome</home>
<remote>com.mycorp.MySessionRemote</remote>
<local-home>com.mycorp.MySessionLocalHome</local-home>
<local>com.mycorp.MySessionLocal</local>
<ejb-class>com.mycorp.MySessionFacadeBean</ejb-class>
<session-type>Stateless</session-type>
<transaction-type>Container</transaction-type>
<resource-ref>
<res-ref-name>jdbc/DataSource</res-ref-name>
<res-type>javax.sql.DataSource</res-type>
<res-auth>Container</res-auth>
</resource-ref>
</session>
But now in the jboss.xml, we will have the following elements. What you may notice is that are bound to different remote and local jndi names. But the resource bindings are very different. The res-ref-name stays the same, but the jndi-name are different. I think this will work for you.
<session>
<ejb-name>MySessionAlpha</ejb-name> <jndi-name>ejb/com/mycorp/MySessionAlphaRemoteHome</jndi-name> <local-jndi-name>ejb/com/mycorp/MySessionAlphaLocalHome</local-jndi-name>
<resource-ref>
<res-ref-name>jdbc/datasource</res-ref-name>
<jndi-name>java:/Database1</jndi-name>
</resource-ref>
</session>
<session>
<ejb-name>MySessionBeta</ejb-name> <jndi-name>ejb/com/mycorp/MySessionBetaRemoteHome</jndi-name> <local-jndi-name>ejb/com/mycorp/MySessionBetaLocalHome</local-jndi-name>
<resource-ref>
<res-ref-name>jdbc/datasource</res-ref-name>
<jndi-name>java:/Database2</jndi-name>
</resource-ref>
</session>

Timesten replication with multiple interfaces sharing the same hostname

Hi,
we have in our environment two Sun T2000 nodes, running SunOS 5.10 and hosting a TT server currently in Release 7.0.5.9.0, replicated between each other.
I would like to have some more information on the behavior of the replication w.r.t. network reliability when using two interfaces associated to the same hostname, the one used to define the replication element.
To make an example we have our nodes sharing this common /etc/hosts elements:
151.98.227.5 TBMAS10df2 TBMAS10df2-10 TBMAS10df2-ttrep
151.98.226.5 TBMAS10df2 TBMAS10df2-01 TBMAS10df2-ttrep
151.98.227.4 TBMAS9df1 TBMAS9df1-10 TBMAS9df1-ttrep
151.98.226.4 TBMAS9df1 TBMAS9df1-01 TBMAS9df1-ttrep
with the following element defined for replication:
ALTER REPLICATION REPLSCHEME
ADD ELEMENT HDF_GNP_CDPN_1 TABLE HDF_GNP_CDPN
CHECK CONFLICTS BY ROW TIMESTAMP
COLUMN ConflictResTimeStamp
REPORT TO '/sn/sps/HDF620/datamodel/tt41dataConflict.rpt'
MASTER tt41data ON "TBMAS9df1-ttrep"
SUBSCRIBER tt41data ON "TBMAS10df2-ttrep"
RETURN RECEIPT BY REQUEST
ADD ELEMENT HDF_GNP_CDPN_2 TABLE HDF_GNP_CDPN
CHECK CONFLICTS BY ROW TIMESTAMP
COLUMN ConflictResTimeStamp
REPORT TO '/sn/sps/HDF620/datamodel/tt41dataConflict.rpt'
MASTER tt41data ON "TBMAS10df2-ttrep"
SUBSCRIBER tt41data ON "TBMAS9df1-ttrep"
RETURN RECEIPT BY REQUEST;
On this subject moving from 6.0.x to 7.0.x there has been some changes I would like to better understand.
6.0.x reported in the documentation for Unix systems:
If a host contains multiple network interfaces (with different IP addresses),
TimesTen replication tries to connect to the IP addresses in the same order as
returned by the gethostbyname call. It will try to connect using the first address;
if a connection cannot be established, it tries the remaining addresses in order
until a connection is established.
Now On Solaris I don't know how to let gethostbyname return more than one interface (the documention notes at this point:
If you have multiple network interface cards (NICs), be sure that “multi
on” is specified in the /etc/host.conf file. Otherwise, gethostbyname will not
return multiple addresses).
But I understand this could be valid for Linux based systems not for Solaris.
Now if I properly understand the above, how was the 6.0.x able to realize the first interface in the list (using the same -ttrep hostname) was down and use the other, if gethostbyname was reporting only a single entry ?
Once upgraded to 7.0.x we realized the ADD ROUTE option was added to teach TT how to use different interfaces associated to the same hostname. In our environment we did not include this clause, but still the replication was working fine regardless of which interface we were bringing down.
My both questions in the end lead to the same doubt on which is the algorithm used by TT to reach the replicated node w.r.t. entries in the /etc/hosts.
Looking at the nodes I can see that by default both routes are being used:
TBMAS10df2:/-# netstat -an|grep "151.98.227."
151.98.225.104.45312 151.98.227.4.14000 1049792 0 1049800 0 ESTABLISHED
151.98.227.5.14005 151.98.227.4.47307 1049792 0 1049800 0 ESTABLISHED
151.98.227.5.14005 151.98.227.4.48230 1049792 0 1049800 0 ESTABLISHED
151.98.227.5.46050 151.98.227.4.14005 1049792 0 1049800 0 ESTABLISHED
TBMAS10df2:/-# netstat -an|grep "151.98.226."
151.98.226.5.14000 151.98.226.4.47699 1049792 0 1049800 0 ESTABLISHED
151.98.226.5.14005 151.98.226.4.47308 1049792 0 1049800 0 ESTABLISHED
151.98.226.5.44949 151.98.226.4.14005 1049792 0 1049800 0 ESTABLISHED
Tried to trace with ttTraceMon but once I brought down one of the interfaces did not see any reaction on either node, if you have some info it would be really appreciated !
Cheers,
Mike

Hi Chris,
Thanks for the reply, I have few more queries on this.
1.Using the ROUTE CLAUSE we can use multiple IPs using priority level set, so that if highest priority level set in thr ROUTE clause for the IP is not active it will fall back to the next level priority 2 set IP. But cant we use ROUTE clause to use the multiple route IPs for replication simultaneously?
2. can we execute multiple schema for the same DSN and replication scheme but with different replication route IPs?
for example:
At present on my system, I have a replication scheme running for a specific DSN with stand alone Master-Subscriber mechanism, with a specific route IP through VLAN-xxx for replication.
Now I want to create and start another replication scheme for the same DSN and replication mechanism with a different VLAN-yyy route IP to be used for replication in parallel to the existing replication scheme. without making any changes to the pre-existing replication scheme.
for the above scenarios, will there be any specific changes respective to the different replication schema mechanism ie., Active Standby and Standalone Master Subscriber mechanism etc.,
If so what are the steps. like how we need to change the existing schema?
Thanks In advance.
Naveen

EText - Multiple elements in the same record

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for