Expression Filters Performance

Hi,
I'm trying to test the expression filters functionality using two tables:
Env: Oracle 11g R2 (11.2.0.2) EE on AIX
T1 is the data table and contains about 90 million rows with around 60 columns. Only 4 columns are evaluated in the filter with three of them always having a value (me_cat, me_tp, me_code) and the other one (base_plan) having nulls in some rows.
T2 contains 666 expressions using the four columns I mentioned before in every expression.
I have tried different parameters for the index on the T2(expression column) but it doesn't help at all.
This is the query I'm using:
insert into ma_pps_mpt_eligibles
select
m.id_monthly_record,
m.id_client,
m.name_client,
m.cd_sex,
m.cd_race,
m.dt_birth,
m.sig,
m.dt_elig,
m.dt_smib_from,
m.dt_smib_thru,
m.flag_smib,
m.cd_buy_in,
m.base_plan,
m.mc_county,
m.mc_statuscode,
m.mc_cd_occur,
m.me_cat,
m.me_code,
m.dt_me_open,
m.dt_me_close,
m.me_tp,
m.me_sd,
m.me_cd_occur,
m.age,
m.contractor,
m.mc_plan,
m.dt_mc_from,
m.dt_mc_to,
m.cd_smib_buyin,
m.id_hmo,
m.id_state_rg,
m.excl_prem,
m.excl_count,
m.rate_pure,
m.rate_admin,
m.page_count,
m.rg_page,
m.voucher_page,
m.id_provider_sp,
m.srv_grp,
m.srv_code,
m.med_choice_code,
m.dt_admit,
m.dt_discharge,
m.dt_int_admit,
m.flag_alias,
m.id_client_real,
m.zip_mail,
m.size_family,
m.income_family,
m.education,
m.id_case,
m.flag_tx_hold,
m.id_type_plan,
m.cd_partition,
m.validity,
m.hic,
m.ssn,
m.flag_lockin,
m.counter,
m.rg_comp_id,
t.id_mtp_elig_rule
from
ma_pps_monthly m,
ma_pps_mtp_elig_rules_exp t
where
m.cd_partition = '201104' and
m.validity = 0 and
evaluate
t.mtp_rule_condition,
ty_ma_pps_mtp_elig_attr (m.me_cat, m.me_tp, m.me_code, m.base_plan).getvarchar()
) = 1
What I'm doing/assuming wrong here?
Has anyone tried to evaluate such amount of data?
Regards,
Galo

what exactly is the problem? it doesn't work? it takes too long?

Similar Messages

  • Is ABAP expression FORM - PERFORM can be used in SAP BI 7.0 transformation

    Hello
    Is ABAP expression FORM - PERFORM can be used in SAP BI 7.0 transformations or method odf class is a recommended approach?
    Thanks

    SAP BI 7.x Transformations use OO ABAP where the logic that you enter into the tranformational routines (Start Routine, Characteristic Routines and End Routine) are inside METHODS. PERFORM and FORM are procedural-based ABAP and cannot be used in METHODS.
    CLASS-METHOD and Function Modules are your best bets for processing outside of the transformational routine. As for performance, we use both and haven't found any signicant difference between the two (our custom Function Modules usually perform only slight better than our custom METHODS).

  • Expression Builder performance

    Is there anything that can be done about the Expression Builder performance? Whenever I need to make a change to an XPath expression I've got to wait 2-3 minutes for JDev to respond. Very irritating. I'm using 10.1.3.3.0 (Build 070615.0525)

    If you look at this document :
    http://download.oracle.com/docs/cd/B31017_01/integrate.1013/b28981/appx_deploydesc.htm
    and search for :
    xpathValidation
    "xpathValidation      Default value is True. If set to False, the compiler does not validate the XPath queries."
    maybe this is what you need.

  • Parallel execution for Expression Filters

    I'm looking for any information on whether expression filters are amenable to parallel execution or not.
    I had a look through the documentation without success, and saw that in the type declarations for supporting objects there is no mention of DETERMINISTIC or PARALLEL_ENABLE. However, the static functions and procedures do not look like they have any constructs that the database would see as an impediment for parallel execution.
    Can anyone advise on this?

    Thanks for that.
    Maybe in a parallel query environment the index will not be used. But I was really wondering whether the execution of the Evaluate function itself would be parallelised, as it invokes functions that are not explicitly marked as deterministic or as safe for parallel execution.
    http://download.oracle.com/docs/cd/B19306_01/appdev.102/b14251/adfns_packages.htm#BABIGDGE
    Well, I'll see if I can investigate (maybe I'll have to suspend those system triggers that prevent modification of the Type ... just for experimental reasons, you understand).

  • Are there risks involved with turning on messenger express filtering

    Sun Java(tm) System Messaging Server 6.2-4.03 (built Sep 22 2005)
    libimta.so 6.2-4.03 (built 04:37:42, Sep 22 2005)
    SunOS ims-a 5.9 Generic_118558-39 sun4u sparc SUNW,Sun-Fire-480R
    The following doc describes how to turn on messegger express filtering:
    http://docs.sun.com/source/817-6266/postinstall.html#wp19950
    We're wondering if there any risks involved with turning this on. Why isn't this turned on by default?
    Thanks,

    jeffbeck wrote:
    Sun Java(tm) System Messaging Server 6.2-4.03 (built Sep 22 2005)
    libimta.so 6.2-4.03 (built 04:37:42, Sep 22 2005)
    SunOS ims-a 5.9 Generic_118558-39 sun4u sparc SUNW,Sun-Fire-480RYou may want to consider updating this to a later patch release e.g. 118207-63 if you want to stay on MS6.2 or 120228-25 if you want to upgrade to MS6.3.
    The following doc describes how to turn on messegger express filtering:
    http://docs.sun.com/source/817-6266/postinstall.html#wp19950
    We're wondering if there any risks involved with turning this on. There are the obvious risks i.e. something new/different is a risk and of course users will be adding sieve rules to their accounts which increases load on the messaging server MTA. You would need to add a lot of rules to be a problem though.
    In general though the risk is minimal.
    Why isn't this turned on by default?Customer who run messaging server don't necessarily have a webserver installed which is required to host the MailFilter.war so it isn't enabled by default.
    Regards,
    Shane.

  • Expression Filter Performance Issues / Misuse?

    I'm currently evaluating the Expression Filter functionality for a new requirement. The basic idea of the requirement is that I have a logging table that I want to get "interesting" records from. The way I want to set it up is to exclude known, "uninteresting", records or record patterns.
    So as far as an implementation I was considering a table of expressions that contained expression filter entries for the "uninteresting" records and checking this against my logging table using the EVALUATE operator and looking for a 0 result.
    In my testing I wanted to return results where the EVALUTE operator is equal to 1 to see if my expressions are correct. In doing this I was experiencing significant performance issues. For example my test filter matches 72 rows out of 61657 possible entries. It took Oracle almost 10 minutes to evaluate this expression. I tried it with and without an Expression Filter index with no noticeable change in execution time. The test case and query is provided below.
    Is this the right use case for Expression Filter? Am I misunderstanding how it works? What am I doing wrong?
    Test Case:
    Version
    BANNER
    Oracle Database 11g Enterprise Edition Release 11.2.0.1.0 - Production
    PL/SQL Release 11.2.0.1.0 - Production
    CORE    11.2.0.1.0      Production
    TNS for 32-bit Windows: Version 11.2.0.1.0 - Production
    NLSRTL Version 11.2.0.1.0 - Production
    Objects & Query:
    CREATE TABLE expressions( white_list VARCHAR2(200));
    CREATE TABLE data
    AS
    SELECT OBJECT_ID
         , OWNER
         , OBJECT_NAME
         , CREATED
         , LAST_DDL_TIME
    FROM   DBA_OBJECTS
    BEGIN
      -- Create the empty Attribute Set --
      DBMS_EXPFIL.CREATE_ATTRIBUTE_SET('exptype');
      -- Define elementary attributes of EXF$TABLE_ALIAS type --
      DBMS_EXPFIL.ADD_ELEMENTARY_ATTRIBUTE('exptype','data',
                                            EXF$TABLE_ALIAS('test_user.data'));
    END;
    BEGIN
      DBMS_EXPFIL.ASSIGN_ATTRIBUTE_SET('exptype','expressions','white_list');
    END;
    INSERT INTO expressions(white_list) VALUES('data.owner=''TEST_USER'' AND data.created BETWEEN TO_DATE(''08/03/2010'',''MM/DD/YYYY'') AND TO_DATE(''08/05/2010'',''MM/DD/YYYY'')');
    exec dbms_stats.gather_table_stats(USER,'EXPRESSIONS');
    exec dbms_stats.gather_table_stats(USER,'DATA');
    CREATE INDEX expIndex ON Expressions (white_list) INDEXTYPE IS EXFSYS.EXPFILTER
      PARAMETERS ('STOREATTRS (data.owner,data.object_name,data.created)
                   INDEXATTRS (data.owner,data.object_name,data.created)');
    SELECT /*+ gather_plan_statistics */ data.* FROM data, expressions WHERE EVALUATE(white_list,exptype.getVarchar(data.rowid)) = 1;
    DROP TABLE expressions PURGE;
    BEGIN
            DBMS_EXPFIL.DROP_ATTRIBUTE_SET(attr_set => 'exptype');
    END;
    DROP TABLE data PURGE;

    Hi,
    If you are already using the queries and are stable enough then rather than modifying query you can try other options to improve the query performance like data compression of the cube, creation of aggregates, placing cube on BIA or creating cache for the query.
    Best Regards,
    Prashant Vankudre.

  • Oracle 10g Express Edition performances

    I'm looking for something about performances of Oracle 10g Express Edition to make a little presentation for the University. Can anyone help me?
    Thnaks

    I'm looking for something about performances of
    Oracle 10g Express Edition to make a little
    presentation for the University. Can anyone help me?What's the matter with the docco? 1 processor only, 1GB ram, one db
    and 4GB disk.
    As to how this will affect your* performance, this can only be
    done by you testing under given conditions. However, if you are doing
    Uni work, why not use the EE - you only have to pay for deployment AFAIK.

  • Which is correct Syntax for IN function in SQL expressions filters?

    Hi,
    I want to build a report which looks at the last 4 snapshot dates.
    I obtained each snapshot date using this filter
    Snapshot Date."Snapshot Date" =TIMESTAMPADD( SQL_TSI_WEEK,-10, TIMESTAMPADD(SQL_TSI_DAY, ( 7 - dayofweek(current_date) + 2), current_date) ) A
    now the second one would be:
    Snapshot Date."Snapshot Date" =TIMESTAMPADD( SQL_TSI_WEEK,-10, TIMESTAMPADD(SQL_TSI_DAY, ( 6 - dayofweek(current_date) + 2), current_date) ) B
    third one
    Snapshot Date."Snapshot Date" =TIMESTAMPADD( SQL_TSI_WEEK,-10, TIMESTAMPADD(SQL_TSI_DAY, ( 5- dayofweek(current_date) + 2), current_date) ) C
    4th one
    Snapshot Date."Snapshot Date" =TIMESTAMPADD( SQL_TSI_WEEK,-10, TIMESTAMPADD(SQL_TSI_DAY, ( 4 - dayofweek(current_date) + 2), current_date) ) D
    to simplify them let's call the filters A, B , C, D
    so, my sql expression should be like something like Snapshot Date."Snapshot Date" in 'A', 'B', 'D', 'C'
    I have tried to combine the below, with brackets and comma separated, without brackets, with single quotes and without, but I always get a syntax error.
    Snapshot Date."Snapshot Date" in TIMESTAMPADD( SQL_TSI_WEEK,-10, TIMESTAMPADD(SQL_TSI_DAY, ( 7 - dayofweek(current_date) + 2), current_date) ) ,
    TIMESTAMPADD( SQL_TSI_WEEK,-10, TIMESTAMPADD(SQL_TSI_DAY, ( 6 - dayofweek(current_date) + 2), current_date) ) ,
    TIMESTAMPADD( SQL_TSI_WEEK,-10, TIMESTAMPADD(SQL_TSI_DAY, ( 5 - dayofweek(current_date) + 2), current_date) ) ,
    TIMESTAMPADD( SQL_TSI_WEEK,-10, TIMESTAMPADD(SQL_TSI_DAY, ( 4 - dayofweek(current_date) + 2), current_date) )
    It doesn't seem to like the IN function either.
    Any idea?
    Regards
    G.
    Edited by: user6185307 on Oct 27, 2009 8:07 AM

    Take each of these filters and union them in your answers report.
    This way, you filter down to exactly the last 4 days.

  • XPath Expression Builder Performance after Oracle FMW PS4 Upgrade

    Hi,
    Is there anyone out there on OFMW PS4 and facing performance issues with the BPEL Assign 'XPath Expression Builder'. We have a scenario where the BPEL process has to reference many schemas (arnd. 50+) from referenced Partner Link WSDLs and its own composite. The Expression Builder seems to be very very slow (takes minutes to load) as compared PS2 (only seconds).
    Are we alone on this one / anyone has any experience/fix/workaround?
    BTW,
    We've unchecked the "Validate" check box from SOA Preferences, still no luck.
    Regards,
    Srinath.

    Hi,
    Is there anyone out there on OFMW PS4 and facing performance issues with the BPEL Assign 'XPath Expression Builder'. We have a scenario where the BPEL process has to reference many schemas (arnd. 50+) from referenced Partner Link WSDLs and its own composite. The Expression Builder seems to be very very slow (takes minutes to load) as compared PS2 (only seconds).
    Are we alone on this one / anyone has any experience/fix/workaround?
    BTW,
    We've unchecked the "Validate" check box from SOA Preferences, still no luck.
    Regards,
    Srinath.

  • Jsp 2.0 Expression Language Performance

    Hi,
              We're using EL throughout our application JSPs and Tags (${x} expressions), and we've discovered that for each dynamic expression used, the weblogic implementation creates a new ExpressionEvaluator object, a new Parser object, performs the parsing at runtime and returns the needed value. This leads to an enourmous amount of unneeded objects which multiply our needed heap for a given activity by several times. We did not measure the CPU impact of the runtime parsing, but my guess is that it will be a significant one.
              The weblogic implementation uses javelin.jsp.* classes for the ExpressionEvaluator (it is hard coded in the generated java classes that JspC creates). This implementation does not have any kind of caching for expressions that have already been parsed, and create a new ExpressionEvaluator for each expression even though the requirement is that ExpressionEvaluators need to be thread-safe (as written in the javax.servlet.jsp.el documentation).
              As we see it, this implementation is not suitable for performance oriented servers. Our garbage collection times will not be tolerable with this kind of implementation and the maximum load on the system will be degraded by several hundred percents.
              So I have several questions:
              1. Is it possible to tell the JspC compiler to use a different expression evaluator ?
              2. Do u have support for an EL API that is more suitable for performance oriented behavior ?
              3. Why don't the Jsp compiler use the official JspContext.getExpressionEvaluator() method ?
              4. As I understand, the method in (3) is container oriented - so which kind of expression evaluator does this method return when used in Weblogic ? Is it the javelin implementation ?
              I would really appreciate your help in this matter, as u this is a very urgent one.
              Thanks a lot

    This issue has been addressed by CR261427 by caching the expression parse trees and reusing them when the same expression text appears elsewhere in the code.
    Please contact support to get a patch for this issue.

  • Airport express/extreme performance

    I am going to buy either an airport extreme or airport express. It will be used only for Internet access for my ipad.
    I did a google search and found a lot of information on the airport extreme, and it should meet my needs fine. Because of cost and portability, I would prefer the airport express, but I have not been been able to find anything on it, especially as to performance (e.g. how well it penetrates walls in a house).
    Does anyone know of any reviews or other performance information on the airport express?
    BTW, the airport will be connected to my Verizon Fios Actiontec router. I will disable the wifi radio in the Actiontec. Also, I will probably buy direct from Apple refurbished.
    http://store.apple.com/us/browse/home/specialdeals/mac/mac_accessories

    I happened to notice that the technical specifications for the airpot extreme on the apple site indicate that the "wireless protocols" are "IEEE 802.11a/b/g/n". In contrast, the corresponding technical specifications for the airport express are shown as "Draft 802.11n" and "802.11a/b/g". A footnote to the airport express but not the airport extreme technical specifications indicates that:
    The AirPort Express Base Station is based on an IEEE 802.11n draft specification and is compatible with IEEE 802.11a, IEEE 802.11b, and IEEE 802.11g.
    I looked at the pertinenet wikipedia page, and it contained the following:
    802.11n is a recent amendment which improves upon the previous 802.11 standards by adding multiple-input multiple-output antennas (MIMO) and many other newer features. The IEEE has approved the amendment and it was published in October 2009.[9][10] Prior to the final ratification, enterprises were already migrating to 802.11n networks based on the Wi-Fi Alliance's certification of products conforming to a 2007 draft of the 802.11n proposal.
    So, it appears that the airport express has not been updated. Does this make a difference in performance or compatbility with my iPad? I really don't want to overthink this issue, but the reason I am buying an airport device is to solve problems I am having with my verizon fios actiontec wireless router, and I do want to solve the problem.
    Thanks!

  • FM extraction -Filtering -Performance issue

    Hi,
    I have FM which givee me history of users who executed t-codes.I don't want to read all data and then filter.Instead I want to it be filtered (Only 3 usernames) in the FM extraction itself.
    This because it will take a lot of time and performance is effecting.
    Any ideas?
    call function 'SAPWL_STATREC_DIRECT_READ'
        exporting
          read_start_date = fdat
          read_start_time = ftim
          read_end_date   = tdat
          read_end_time   = ttim
          read_client     = cli
         READ_USERNAME   = S_UNAME-LOW
        importing
          normal_records  = normal_records_tbl.
      if sy-subrc <> 0.
    MESSAGE ID SY-MSGID TYPE SY-MSGTY NUMBER SY-MSGNO
            WITH SY-MSGV1 SY-MSGV2 SY-MSGV3 SY-MSGV4.
      endif.
      out_data[] = normal_records_tbl[].
      append out_data.
    Rgds
    Praveen

    Hi Praveen,
                     Take the 3 user names which you want to display into an internal table with a field UNAME.Then write the code like this...
    Loop at itab.
    call function 'SAPWL_STATREC_DIRECT_READ'
    exporting
    read_start_date = fdat
    read_start_time = ftim
    read_end_date = tdat
    read_end_time = ttim
    read_client = cli
    READ_USERNAME = ITAB-UNAME
    importing
    normal_records = normal_records_tbl.
    if sy-subrc 0.
    MESSAGE ID SY-MSGID TYPE SY-MSGTY NUMBER SY-MSGNO
    WITH SY-MSGV1 SY-MSGV2 SY-MSGV3 SY-MSGV4.
    endif.
    endloop.
    Regards,
    Ramana
    Edited by: venkata ramana on Jan 9, 2008 12:52 AM

  • Forte Express Application performance

    Greetings,
    We are in the process of developing an application using Forte Express.
    We have approx. 20 windows, each of which may have 4-5 folders or a nested array
    window. The windows work in pairs. One window will show a brief version of
    records in an array window. When we double-click on a row, we popup a detailed
    version of the record which also has folders to show associations with this
    record.
    Our development is taking place on a Dec Alpha 2100 and two 250's. The
    performance was not that bad considering we were in development mode and several
    instances of Express was running on each machine.
    We recently had to give a demo of what we had accomplished so far. We
    deployed the application and ran it on a 486 66Mhz running Win95 and it was
    incredibly slow. We also ran it on a Pentium-133 and was not much better.
    The delay for popping up detailed windows after double clicking in an array
    field could easily take 10 seconds. We have to run our application on an
    Dec Alpha 2100 to get descent performance!
    Has anybody else experienced this poor performance? What is your
    performance like? Any comments/suggestions appreciated.
    Note: Our database server was a Sparc 5 with 64Meg. Pretty slow but
    we only had one user accessing the database. The Server was also
    not compiled since we were told by the Forte people that the gain
    in performance did not warrant the extra trouble required to
    compile.
    Regards,
    ____ \ / ____ CrossKeys Systems Corporation
    ___ \ X / ___
    \ X X / Crosskeys Centre Peter Kelly
    X X X 350 Terry Fox Drive Software Designer
    ___/ X X \___ Kanata, Ontario
    ____/ X \____ Canada K2K 2P5 [email protected]
    _____/ \_____ (613) 591-1600 Ext. 8247

    Gunnar, I had dbms_snapshot.refresh embedded on one page as "after submit" process and it was enough to crash the application. Apex pages are rendered on-the-fly and the (materialized) view refresh takes somehow too long.
    The same thing happens if you create a regular view that selects from remote database. Connection speed between the host and remote database doesn't seem to matter.
    My solution is NOT to refresh materialized views in Apex pages at all. I've recreated my materialized views with the following parameters
    REFRESH COMPLETE ON DEMAND START WITH sysdate+0 NEXT sysdate+1/24
    so that it refreshes every hour and it works perfectly. Let me know if it helps.
    Przemek

  • Filtering performance

    Hi!
    I would like to filter data acquired at 100 Hz with Labview 7.1.
    If I use the default filter box (configuration : 2nd order butterworh filter with a band pass of [5 Hz - 30 Hz] ),
    the filtering process seems to be done at a frequency lower than 100 Hz.
    If I use the IIR module, the VI performance are improved but it does not reach 100 Hz.
    What are the performance of the filtering box?
    Thx

    It is not clear exactly what filter performance you are looking for. If your data is sampled at 100 Hz, then the Nyquist criterion specifies that any signal components above 50 Hz cannot be accurately represented. In fact if there are components above 50 Hz in the signal fed to the data acquisition device, the sampled signal is irretrievably corrupted. Also make sure that your filter knows what the sample rate was. If your data is of type waveform, the timing data is included. If your data is an array of values, you must specify the sample period or frequency. How you do that depends on which filter VI you are using.
    Lynn

  • Questions about Expression Filters

    Hi.
    I've read several times the excellent article "Filter Data Before you Get it" and am seriously considering as number one option for implementing an "Event and Notification Module" for an application. The flexibility and advantages addressed at the end of the article are good enough reason. However i have the following questions:
    - Can I add or delete and attribute to an existing attribute set?. The idea would be to provide users with the ability to add or delete attributes of interest through the use of some metadata. If not, what would be the implications of recreating the attributtes, since there are several objects related to an attribute set(types, triggers, etc.).
    - Can i evaluate expressions on a one by one basis?. The example showed always evaluate all expressions at the same time. My idea here, would be give the users the possibility of specifying the frequency of evaluating a particular expression, since all might not be equally important.
    - Can i use the result of a pl/sql function and use it in an expression set. Again, sometimes things might be more complicated than evaluating columms of a table on a expression.
    Thanks in advance .... Regards, Luis ...!

    Luis,
    Please find my responses below.
    - Can I add or delete and attribute to an existing attribute set?. The idea would be to provide users with the ability to add or delete attributes of interest through the use of some metadata. If not, what would be the implications of recreating the attributes, since there are several objects related to an attribute set(types, triggers, etc.).At this time, an attribute set associated with an expression column cannot be edited (adding new attributes or deleting some attributes). The index and the trigger created to maintain the expression column are closely tied with the attribute set. So, you will have to drop the Expression Filter index and unassign the attribute set in order to recreate the attributes.
    - Can i evaluate expressions on a one by one basis?. The example showed always evaluate all expressions at the same time. My idea here, would be give the users the possibility of specifying the frequency of evaluating a particular expression, since all might not be equally important.Yes, this can be done by specifying additional predicates in the query with EVALUATE operator. For example, the following query only evaluates the expression associated with a specific customer.
    SELECT * FROM Customers
    WHERE CustId = 1234 and
    EVALUATE (Interest, :data) = 1
    But, what is the logic behind "all might not be equally important" ? Often, rules are associated with a priority and the matching rules are ordered based on their priority. In this case, all the expressions are evaluated. But the application ignores the rules with low priority when there a matching rule with high priority.
    - Can i use the result of a pl/sql function and use it in an expression set. Again, sometimes things might be more complicated than evaluating columns of a table on a expression.Yes, you can use user-defined functions in the stored expressions. See Example 10.3 in the Application Developer's Guide - Rules Manager and Expression Filter (10g Release 2) for a sample.
    If you have 10g Release 2, you may also want to look at the Rules Manager feature. This feature allows declarative specification of complex Event-Condition-Action rules in the database and it is built on Expression Filter feature. With the Rules Manager, the ORDERING and CONSUMPTION event management policies can be used to control the execution of specific rules (may relate to your second question).
    Please let us know if you have additional questions.
    Thanks,
    -Aravind.

Maybe you are looking for

  • Hooking up the Badge installer ?

    Hey, I am trying to hook up a catalyst fxp to the Adobe Badge installer, and I am having problems ... Basically I don't know enough about Flex to get this right ... I have got the .js and html all correct and can get it working when I use the example

  • Error occurred while connecting to the FTP server: java.lang.NullPointerExc

    Hello Experts, I have a scenario wherein i have to send file from FTP to application server of ECC. I don't want to do any mapping and transformation; Just need to transfer the file as it is. I have achieved this using Integrated scenario. But in the

  • Why do we have to go through flash players to download DE?

    Okay So after my acrobat reader 8 digital editions fail with an error message, I have to delete everything and just to be on the safe side, reinstall with a acrobat reader 7 After getting countless error messages "failing to autenticate" when i try t

  • When I hit return after typing, the cursor returns to the beginning of the sentence

    I open a new layer. I type my text I hit return' The cursor starts typing at the beginning of the sentence, typing right over the text I just finished.  It will not go to the next line.  I've been using PS since 2 and I have never seen this nor do I

  • How to fit image inside canvas Container?

    Hi All, I want to fit an image inside a canvas. Making x and y to 0 of image is not working. My problem is I am rotating image at 90 and I want to save that image. If i save normally it is not taking rotation. So I am adding that image in a canvas an