Fact column without aggrigation at rpd level is showing error in report

Hi,
in my repository fact table is there "service request".
in that fact i have created one column and i havent given aggrigation. And i havent given levels also.
But if i create report by using this column, it is throwing error.
how to create messure without aggrigation and without levels?
Thanks
Anjireddy

What is the error that you get?
Thanks,
Venkat
http://oraclebizint.wordpress.com

Similar Messages

No fact table exists at the requested level of detai error

Hi Gurus,
Gud Evening,
There is a report with 10 columns and its coming fine when ever we are adding new column some date column (Start Date) it is showing the below error
State: HY000. Code: 10058. [NQODBC] [SQL_STATE: HY000] [nQSError: 10058] A general error has occurred. [nQSError: 43113] Message returned from OBIS. [nQSError: 14025] No fact table exists at the requested level of detail:
Can any give some suggestions..
Regards

Hi,
You have to go to the fact LTS and set granularity for each dimension associated with it. You might be bringing a column from a dimension in your report, for which you didn't set up granularity in the facts LTS.
Thanks
Venkat
OBIEEDeveloper

No fact table exists at the requested level of detail Error.

Hi Everybody,
Facing a issue on the using Fact less Fact tables.
Scenario:
========
Using two subject areas to develop a report.OBIEE 11g
Fact1 --> Compensation Plan Assignments Real Time
Fact2 --> Participant Detail Real Time"."Participant Details
On both facts we created dummy metrics on respective table id's and aggregated to ROWCOUNT.
As i said in earlier we are using the above 2 subject areas to develop reports.
Logical SQL:
===========
SELECT
0 s_0, "Incentive Compensation - Compensation Plan Assignments Real Time"."Role"."Role Name" s_1,
"Incentive Compensation - Participant Detail Real Time"."Participant Details"."Cost Center" s_2,
"Incentive Compensation - Participant Detail Real Time"."Participant Details"."Country Code" s_3,
"Incentive Compensation - Participant Detail Real Time"."Participant"."Participant First Name" s_4,
"Incentive Compensation - Participant Detail Real Time"."Participant"."Participant Last Name" s_5,
"Incentive Compensation - Participant Detail Real Time"."Participant"."Party Number" s_6
FROM "Incentive Compensation - Earnings Real Time" FETCH FIRST 65001 ROWS ONLY
Error Message:
==============
Expression 'RowCount:[DAggr(Fact - Compensation Plan Assignment.RowCount by [ Dim - Participant Details.Cost Center, Dim - Compensation Role.Role Name, Dim - Participant.Participant Name] )]' converted to NULL because [nQSError: 14020] None of the fact tables are compatible with the query request RowCount:[DAggr(Fact - Compensation Plan Assignment.RowCount by [ Dim - Participant Details.Cost Center, Dim - Compensation Role.Role Name, Dim - Participant.Participant Name] )]..
[2013-10-21T12:18:45.000-05:00] [OracleBIServerComponent] [TRACE:2] [USER-34] [] [ecid: 004uJx90aHO9lZ73VJJNB80007eh000gl_,0:2:1:9:5] [tid: 457c2940] [requestid: f2e001b] [sessionid: f2e0000] [username: [email protected]] -------------------- Query Status: [nQSError: 14025] No fact table exists at the requested level of detail:
Please share some ideas on this or any guidelines will be very much helpfull.

Govardhan,
Did u configured any Dimension Hierarchy please set the levels in that particular Fact LTS.
For more info,check the below thread
https://forums.oracle.com/thread/2134934
Thanks,

No fact table exists at the required level of detail

Hi All,
I am getting the below error in report level(11.1.1.6.4).
No fact table exists at the required level of detail.
Thanks & Regards,
Chandra

Hi Chandra,
One of the possibility for this error can be:
if you have 2 sets of dimension and fact say (D1 & F1) , (D2 & F2) and these are 2 sets are not connected to each other. In report criteria if you have columns from all the tables. Then the result will be.'No fact table exists at the required level of detail' error.
Regards,
Arjun.

[nQSError: 14025] No fact table exists at the requested level of detail:

Hi All,
I am using OBIEE 11.1.1.6.8.
I have below senario...My fact table contains 3 LTS(yearly, Monthly, Weekly) and TimeDim contains3 LTSs(yearly, Monthly, Weekly)
Fact-Weekly joins with (D1,D2,D3) & TimeDimWeekly
Fact-Monthly joins with (D1,D2,D3) & TimeDimMonthly
Fact-Yearly joins with (D1,D2,D3) & TimeDimYearly
I hv also set the Fact source content to appropriate level of TimeDIM and details level of other Dimensions.
when i build a report using only year_code or month_code_or week_code as filter the query is going to appropriate physical sources
ie. if i take week_code as filter then the query firing to FactWeek, TimeDimWeekly & other Dimensions
if i take Month_code as filter then the query firing to FactMonthk, TimeDimMonthly & other Dimensions
Problem is when I use dynamic filter its is giving [nQSError: 14025] No fact table exists at the requested level of detail: error.
My filter is something like this using presentation variable pvTime (filter is prompted)
case '@{pvTime}'
when 'Weekly' Then "Calendar"."Week - WYYYY"
when 'Monthly' Then "Calendar"."Month - MONYYYY"
when 'Yearly' Then "Calendar"."Year ID" end
Please help me if I missed any step
Thanks
Smita

Its a guess but try the below.. As you are using the CASE statement in your filter, use it in the below way.
Store the value that is prompted into a presentation Variable
YOUR WAY
case '@{pvTime}'
when 'Weekly' Then "Calendar"."Week - WYYYY"
when 'Monthly' Then "Calendar"."Month - MONYYYY"
when 'Yearly' Then "Calendar"."Year ID" end
SUGGESTED WAY
(case '@{pvTime}'='Weekly' and "Calendar"."Week - WYYYY" = '@{new PV}' THEN 1
when '@{pvTime}'='Monthly' and "Calendar"."Month - MONYYYY" = '@{new PV}' THEN 1
when '@{pvTime}'='Yearly' and "Calendar"."Year ID" = '@{new PV}' THEN 1 ELSE 0 END) =1
This might correct the way your are using your CASE statement in Filters..

HTTPS Without client authentication shows error of Certificate

Hi Experts,
I am trying to develop a SOAP to RFC scenario where in SOAP sender HTTP security level - HTTPS Without Client Authentication is selected.
I have downloaded WSDL from Sender agreement and trying to test web service from SOAPUI. Now as per my understanding simply placing request to HTTPS:<host>:<port>:XISOAPAdapter/....   with correct user should work and this scenario shouldn't need any certificates.
However in SOAPUI and even in RWB SOAP Sender, I am receiving error that - Client Certificate required.
Any comments on why would it be happening ?    In fact whatever option in HTTP Security level I select, error remains same. In NWA is there any other configuration to be done to make this work ?
Is below understanding right ?
-- >> HTTPS Without client authentication will not need certificate exchange and simply user authentication will do
Thanks..
regards,
Omkar.

Hello Omkar,
What you are trying to do is Consume a SOAP->RFC scenario (synchronous) from SOAP UI and you want that to be secure. With this requirement, just having the certificates alone is not sufficient (sorry for late response..i just came across this post when i was searching something else )
1)How did you generate the certificate and the private key? Because Key Generation plays a Big Part in it. The Key should have been signed by a CA. Though its not signed by a CA, a trick which would work is, at the time of Key generation, provide the Organization Name as SAP Trust Community and Country as DE.
2) At the time of Key Generation definitely it shall ask for a password. You remember that.
3) Export the Private Key as PCKS12 format and the certificate as Base64 format and have it in your local system, (shall be used later in SOAP UI and NWA)
Here follows the major part
4) Open NWA and go to Configuration Management->Authentication
5) Go to Properties Taband click Modify
6) Under Logon Application select the check box "Enable Showing Certificate Logon URL Link on Logon Page" and save it.
7) Now go to the Components Tab.
8) Search for client_cert Policy Configuration name and Edit it it. Make sure the following Login Modules are maintained in the same Order
==> Name: com.sap.engine.services.security.server.jaas.ClientCertLoginModule
       Flag : Sufficient
==> Name: BasicPasswordLoginModule
       Flag: Optional
9) Now Select the name com.sap.engine.services.security.server.jaas.ClientCertLoginModule and you can see lots of entries under the Login Module Options. Remove them all and add anew entry (case sensitive). Save it.
==>Name: Rule1.getUserFrom
       value : wholeCert
10) Now search for the Policy Configuration name sap.com/com.sap.aii.adapter.soap.app*XISOAPAdapter
and edit it.
11) Under the Authentication stack select the template client_cert against the used template label. and save it
12)If you are using AXIS Adapter, do the steps 11 for the Policy Configuration name sap.com/com.sap.aii.axis.app*XIAxisAdapter.
13) Now in NWA navigate to Operation management->Identity Management
14) Search for the user PIISUSER (or any user id which you thing has good amount of authorizations to access the service)
15)Click Modify and go to the TAB Certificates and upload the certificate (not the private key) which you downloaded in step 3.
16) With this setup what you have done is you have created proper certificate, enabled certificate based logon for SOAP and AXIS adapter and associated the certificate with a user id.
17) usually in Dual stack PI, we will have the same certificate added to the server pse in strustsso2 tcode. But since its single stack, just make sure in the cert and keys you add this certificate to teh Trusted CAs and also to the Server Keystore.
18) Now in SOAP UI Right Click on the Project Name->Select Show Project View->Under the WS Security Configurations->Go to Keystore and certificates and add the Private Key
19) In SOAP UI under the operation name, in the Request, in stead of providing user credentials, choose the private key name against the SSL Keystore entry.
20) Before you execute the scenario make sure you have chosen the HTTPS url and https port is proper. Usually its 443, but some customers configure their own port.
Scenario should work now. Else if you track it using XPI Inspector, you can find out easily at which step it has gone wrong.
Good Luck!!
Best Regards,
Sundar

Filter on Fact columns at report level- obiee 11g

Hello,
The error I am getting in my report is : Incorrectly defined logical table source (for fact table SUMM) does not contain mapping for [LEDGERFACT.CD, LEDGERFACT.YEARID].
The Model(Physical and BMM Layer) is as follows: DIM_LF_B is joined to 2 fact tables LEDGERFACT and SUMMARY
DIM_RPT_PARAM -> DIM_LF_B -> LEDGERFACT
DIM_RPT_PARAM -> DIM_LF_B -> SUMMARY
Note that the aggregation is not set for any of the Fact columns. (I am aware that all measures have to be set some aggregation type , but Client restrictions as not to edit the rpd :( )
Now on the report front, i have pulled following columns:
>> Col name: Description ||| Forumla: DIM_RPT_PARAM.ITEM_DESC
>> Col name: Actual Amt ||| Formula: case when SUMMARY.MONTHID=3 and SUMMARY.YEARID=2012 then sum(SUMM.AMT_1) else 0 end
>> Col name: Plan Amt ||| Formula: case when LEDGERFACT.YEARID=2012 and LEDGERFACT.CD=300 then sum(LEDGERFACT.AMT_1) else 0 end
I am not able to understand as to why the BI server is throwing the error.
I tried removing the case condition and just applying the sum(as below), and the report comes up.
Col name: Description ||| Forumla: DIM_RPT_PARAM.ITEM_DESC
Col name: Actual Amt ||| Formula: sum(SUMM.AMT_1)
Col name: Plan Amt ||| Formula: sum(LEDGERFACT.AMT_1) Also for the following combination the report works
1)
>> Col name: Description ||| Forumla: DIM_RPT_PARAM.ITEM_DESC
>> Col name: Actual Amt ||| Formula: sum(SUMM.AMT_1)
>> Col name: Plan Amt ||| Formula: case when LEDGERFACT.YEARID=2012 and LEDGERFACT.CD=300 then sum(LEDGERFACT.AMT_1) else 0 end
2)
>> Col name: Description ||| Forumla: DIM_RPT_PARAM.ITEM_DESC
>> Col name: Actual Amt ||| Formula: case when SUMMARY.MONTHID=3 and SUMMARY.YEARID=2012 then sum(SUMM.AMT_1) else 0 end
>> Col name: Plan Amt ||| Formula: sum(LEDGERFACT.AMT_1)
Any help appreciated.
Thnks,
Shruti
Edited by: 970002 on Mar 28, 2013 7:18 AM

Hi Shruthi,
To be clear you have one table 'DIM_LF_B' and its separated out as FACT and DIM in BMM layer with respective formulas ? If yes check this http://www.varanasisaichand.com/2012/04/fact-and-dimension-from-single-source.html
let me know if it is different
Thanks,
Saichand

Logical column currency format properties at rpd level?

I need to show the currency amount with dollar symbol for a logical column and that should happen at rpd level.
Is there anyway we could do that ?
thank you

Hi User.
You can have logical column name as 'Amount in $' or 'Amount in Dollar'
this is the best practice..
Then if you want value to be suffixed by $ , you can go for data formatting in column properties.....
this is commonly used....
mark if Correct/helps .
fiaz

OBI Joining two lookup tables. [nQSError: 14025] No fact table exists at the requested level of detail

Hello,
I basically have only fact tables that I need for my analysis. No dimensions, no hierarchies.
When add two tables in OBI Answers to start the analysis I see this error:
[nQSError: 14025] No fact table exists at the requested level of detail
I have them defined as lookup tables. How can I join lookup tables?
In order to pre-filter them using the user_name session variable.

Hi Nagireddy.
As described:
open your rpd. go to "manage" -> Variable Manager / New / Session / Variable. so to create a new session variable in the .rpd.
then you create a variable NO_FORCE_TO_DETAIL_BIN and se the default to 1.
BUT....this did actually not do the trick
I have created a logical table that is a table made up of the two that I just want to join and as soon as I create a bi answers report that contain columns from those two tables I see the error 14025.

Implicit Fact Column being ignored

Hi,
I have a Business model containing two fact tables with a shared sets of conformed dimensions. Dim1 and Dim2 are both mapped to Fact1 and Fact2.
When I select attributes from Dim1 and Dim2 (without facts), OBIEE picks Fact2 to pull up the records. Since I want OBIEE to use Fact1, I've setup an Implicit Fact Column using a measure of Fact1.
After restarting all services, OBIEE still picks Fact2 (probably because it has less -conformed- dimensions). When I check the physical query, the Implict Fact Column is NOT included in the select statement so OBIEE is basically ignoring it.
Is there any config-setting which influences how OBIEE activates the Implicit Fact Column?
OBIEE-version = 10.1.3.4.1
Thanks!

Well.... not really suggestions... but I did some more google research and came out with some comments...Pls. note that they are not mine comments... just copy/paste from a couple of blogs.
"This column is generally the *lowest granularity column* of the fact table like Row_wid etc"
"It all boils down to the granularity of the data present in the fact tables.
If a fact contains data at a more granular level then always that will be preferred over the other fact.
The 'Implicit fact column' comes into picture when you want to enforce a fact as the default path when used in a report."
"For dimension-only queries across multiple dimensions, Oracle BI Server picks the most economical fact table source
based on t*he number and levels of joined dimensions*."
Antonio
BExpert, Brazil

Implicit Fact Column - am I thinking about this the right way?

My exploration of the Implicit Fact Column is below. Let me know if you think this is the intended usage.
When the BI Server sees a request where one Dimension is being constrained by another, it has to pick a fact table that contains references to these two dimensions. The "Implicit Fact Column", which is set in the Presentation Layer of the RPD is used to guide the BI Server towards one or more Fact tables that can be used to satisfy the request. In the absence of the Implicit Fact Column, I noticed that the BI Server was choosing random fact tables so I went exploring how this feature worked. I set the Implicit Fact column in my Presentation layer and then went looking to see how the queries were generated.
For my example, my two dimensions are Program and Channel. I want to see the list of Channels available for a Program. Without the Implicit Fact Column, the queries are of the form:
select distinct T289.CHANNEL_NAME as c1,
T36001.PROGRAM_NAME as c2
from
DIM_PROGRAMS T36001,
DIM_CHANNELS T289,
SomeRandomFactTable T41210
where ( T289.DIM_CHANNEL_KEY = T41210.DIM_CHANNEL_KEY and T36001.DIM_PROGRAM_KEY = T41210.DIM_PROGRAM_KEY )
order by c1, c2
The nice part about this is that there is only one set of Program / Channel combinations returned. The downside is that the Fact table that is chosen to resolve the combinations can be any Fact table under the purview of the BI Server. It doesn't even have to be in the same subject area where the Program and Channel were chosen. When I set the Implicit Fact Column, the queries are of the form:
select distinct T289.CHANNEL_NAME as c1,
T36001.PROGRAM_NAME as c2,
T35832.DIM_SITE_KEY /* this is the implicit fact column */
from
DIM_PROGRAMS T36001,
DIM_CHANNELS T289,
AFactTableMappedToFactColumn T35832
where ( T289.DIM_CHANNEL_KEY = T35832.DIM_CHANNEL_KEY and T35832.DIM_PROGRAM_KEY = T36001.DIM_PROGRAM_KEY )
order by c1, c2
I was happy that I could predict what Fact table was being used, but now the results are wrong as I get a duplicate set of records for every DIM_SITE_KEY / Channel / Program combination. I decided to play a little Algebra trick. Knowing that the DIM_SITE_KEY was a numeric value, I defined the Implicit fact column as DIM_SITE_KEY / DIM_SITE_KEY which will always result in a value of 1. Now I get queries that look like:
select distinct T289.CHANNEL_NAME as c1,
T36001.PROGRAM_NAME as c2,
T35832.DIM_SITE_KEY / nullif( T35832.DIM_SITE_KEY, 0) as c3
from
DIM_PROGRAMS T36001,
DIM_CHANNELS T289,
AFactTableMappedToFactColumn T35832
where ( T289.DIM_CHANNEL_KEY = T35832.DIM_CHANNEL_KEY and T35832.DIM_PROGRAM_KEY = T36001.DIM_PROGRAM_KEY )
order by c1, c2
Since DIM_SITE_KEY / DIM_SITE_KEY is always equal to 1, I only get one set of Program / Channel combinations. I get the added bonus of knowing which set of Fact tables are going to be used to satisfy the request.

Perfect Analysis, But one important note is when using implicit fact table, Always select measure( Which has some aggregation) as a implicit fact column. So that will allows the query will eliminate duplicate rows by doing a group by operation.
Other note is make sure performance is good. When we don't have a good model for fact tables, when the tables contains large set of data, make sure performance is good by doing indexes or caching to load the prompts.
- Madan

OBIEE 11g - No fact table exists at the requested level of detail

My dimesion tables are snow-flake.
Table1 has Key, ProductName, ProductSize, Table2Key
Table2 has Key, ProductDepartment, Table3Key
Table3 has Key, ProductDivision
I have created 2 hierarchies (in same dimension Product). Note: ProductSize is in Table1.
ProductDivision > ProductDepartment > ProductName (shared level)
ProductSize > ProductName (shared level)
There are 2 fact tables
Fact1 is at ProductName level
Fact2 is at ProductDepartment level
When I create a request with columns as ProductSize and some measure; and filter it on ProductDepartment. The request fails with error "No fact table exists at the requested level of detail", but the request can ideally be answered using fact with ProductName level.
I have properly defined logical level keys in the hierarchies and logical level in the LTS (content tab)
Can anyone point me what I am doing wrong here?

Since both fact tables are at same granular level I would suggest to map each other (Signon_A maping Signon_B) in BMM layer logical fact @source.
Considering them as Fact and with fact extension.
BTW: Did you try by setting implicit fact at subject area properties?
Edited by: Srini VEERAVALLI on Feb 1, 2013 9:04 AM

No fact table exists at the requested level of detail

We have two fact tables F1,F2 and D1, D2, D3, D4, D5 dimensions.
They are connected line this.
F1 to D1, D2, D3 and self dimension D_of_F1
F2 to D2, D3 and self dimension D_of_F2
Means D2 and D3 are common dimensions between two facts.
D_of_F1
         |
         |
D1--F1--D2
         |      |
         |      |
        D3   |
        |       |
        |       |
        |-F2-|
        |
        |
        |
   D_of_F2
Hierarchies
H1 for D1
H2 for D2
H3 for D3
H_of_F1 for D_of_F1
H_of_F2 for D_of_F2
and pinned LTS of F1 --> H1 detail, H2 Detail,H3 Detail, H_of_F1 Detail
and pinned LTS of F2 --> H2 Detail,H3 Detail, H_of_F2 Detail
We are selecting these columns
D1.C1, D1.C2, D2.C1, D2.C2,D3.C1 and report works perfactly.
But when I add D_of_F2.C1 then report gives this error
Message returned from OBIS. [nQSError: 43119] Query Failed: [nQSError: 14025] No fact table exists at the requested level of detail
Please help me to solve this error....
I m new in OBIEE concepts so not able to trubleshoot...
Thank you.

i'm try to do an analysis between two tables (that have a relatinship), we had inclued first the FACTURA.FACTURA_COD, then columns from COBRANCAS and it work's. When we inclued the FACTURA.COMISSIONISTA_ID it return the fowlling error :check the level set in content tab in fact table.it can happen that FACTURA.COMISSIONISTA_ID is at a lower level than specified in fact table.
Regards,
Sandeep

No Fact table exists at this detail level error

Hi All,
I am trying to develop an RPD and was trying to use a simple example of joining two fact tables in OBIEE through confirmed dimension.
This is my example:
Fact A: Student ID (FK)......Measure1, Measure2...
Fact B: Student ID (FK)........Measure A, Measure B
DIM 1: Student ID (PK),.....
I would like to give the users the option of joining Fact A and Fact B through Dim 1( Which is a conforming Dimension)
I tried with out level based hierarchy and got NO Fact exists at this level of detail.
Then I tried creating the level based hierarchy on Dim 1 and selected the detail level for the fact table and I am still getting the error message.
Am i doing some thing wrong here ? Or Am i missing any important setting ?
Is there a way to check whether the dimension is a conforming dimension or not in OBIEE.
Your help is much appreciated.
Thanks
Venu

Can we use between operator in physical join. We did that, its successfully checking in, but when we re-open the join, its show in RED color.
So, got doubt, can we use between?When you checkout the rpd object in online mode it would display in red, this is not an error.
"No fact table exists at the requested level of detail"; what does this error meanThis error usually happens if you have not mapped the content level correctly in the logical table source.
Rgds,
Dpka

Using a Fact Column in Prompt

Hi,
I have requirement to use a Fact Column (Eg: Control flag) to be used in the Column Prompt. What is the best way of using it such that query performance will improve. If I use it directly it might have scan through my entire fact table which will have a performance impact.
Is there a best way to do it?
Thanks,
GJ

Hi GJ,
The "proper" way to model this in the RPD is to add the column on to a dimension vs. leaving it on the fact table. i.e. the underlying physical fact table becomes a source for both a logical dimension and the logical fact. OBIEE smart enough to sort everything out.
Having said that - the real performance issue could be because, in a prompt, it would have to scan a potentially huge fact table to get the distinct values of the control flag. If that's the case, then you should either 1) build a real dimension table to make it faster (this would be preferable), or 2) add a bitmap index to the control flag column on the fact table, which would also greatly improve the performance of the "select distinct control flag from fact table" query.
Hope this helps!
Scott

Fact column without aggrigation at rpd level is showing error in report

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for