FI CO Reconciliation

Hi Experts,
I need to answer a question for our client which is not using SAP New GL... so I need to find an answer in the past...
thanks for your helps,
FX
Question: Determine the cause, corrective action, or reconciliation measures to remedy differences between the legal reporting (from FI) and management (from CO) reporting financial data

Hi,
You can check note 423889 for finding inconsistencies between FI and CO. The reasons for this inconsistencies could vary from missing configuration (e.g. non-defined cost element) to 'bugs' in the earlier releases of SAP.
Regards,
Eli

Similar Messages

Changing vendor reconciliation account

Hi Experts
There are around 1500 vendors for whom we entered wrong reconciliation account. There would be around 20000 line items (uploaded line items, open line items and cleared line items).
Now I want to know what would be the best practice for correcting mistake.
1. Do we need to create new vendor master and transfer balances to new balances to vendor master using LSMW program
2. Do we need to change reconciliation account and run F101 every month end for next 8-10months unless all opening balance is knocked off.
Please let me know impact of above two options considering volume and reporting.
Meenu

If option 2 is acceptable to business, then I would suggest to go with second option, SAP allows to modify Reconciliation account with respective configuration change at master data setup. However, I am not sure, how system would react in following situation, please do a POC for same:
After recon account is changed from 1000 to 1001 at respective vendor master record, and you are processing a payment for against open item, which was recorded with 1000 recon account. In this case, just double check, whether system is able bring open items for clearing and also check it is adjusting against 1000 recon account.
Best regards

Change Customer Reconciliation Account

I need some assistance in verifying the steps for changing Recon account for a group of customers.
Scenario. We have a group of customers (about 60) who have postings to them. Some of the posting are open and some are cleared. We need to change the reconciliation account on these customers. We are running under ECC 6.0
I know how to change the reconciliation account on the customer. That is not a problem. The problem comes with handling the open and cleared items already posted to these customers.
I believe that at some point in time I need to run trans F101. In order to run this transaction I need to define an adjustment account using transaction OBBW. One of my questions here is do I define this as an adjustment account for both the old and the new reconciliation account or for just the old reconciliation account.
Now most of my questions relate to:
1.     What are the steps required in order to run F101(FAGLF101 for 6.0)?
2.     Is there something that I will need to do each month or will this be a one time situation only for me?
3.     Will/are there any special steps required for clearing the open items once the reconciliation accounts have been changed?
4.     Is there anything else (any gotchas) that I should be aware of?
Any assistance will be greatly appreciated.
Greg Brown
FI/CO Consultant

the thread you sent me answers part of my questions (namely the fact that I need multiple recon adjustment accounts and the basic steps for executing F101 (FAGLF101).
However, with regards to my other questions, here is what I am interpreting from the thread.
1. Is there something that I will need to do each month or will this be a one time situation only for me?
<b>Assumed answer:</b> I will need to run this every month until the balance of the old recon account for the customers in question is zero.
2. Will/are there any special steps required for clearing the open items once the reconciliation accounts have been changed?
<b>Assumed answer:</b> Apparently not. I will clear the old items (posted but not cleared at the time I changed the recon account) from the old recon account; clear new items (posted and cleared after I change the recon account) for the customer for the new recon account.
Am I correct on this?
Any additional help that you can provide me will be greatly appreciated.
Greg Brown

Questions on AP and PO Accrual Reconciliation?

Dear all,
I know the purpose of "The AP and PO Accrual Reconciliation Report" provides a transactional breakdown of each accrual account with a net balance not equal to zero in a summarized or full transaction details version.
However, I found out that on of the Purchase Order has been done the PO receipt and created an invoice in AP (validate and accounted). But the report still showing PO is 0 and AP is 343,000 in AP and PO Accrual Reconciliation report. I am just wondering what I have done wrong suppose the PO and AP should be equal in that case.
Please advice.
Thanks.

Is there any miscellaneous transactions recorded in error to your accrual accounts,These miscellaneous transactions or transactions unrelated to purchase order receipts may be from Payables.

Error in updating OBNK Table ( Bank Statements and Reconciliations,Manual)

PLease advise ,
Bank Statements and Reconciliations,Manual Reconciliation
Client is receiving the following message:
Error in updating OBNK Table
Edited by: Philip Eller on May 20, 2008 9:03 AM

Hi Darpal Thiarha,
Please kindly refer to note 1132591 and note 1128677 to see if these are relevant to this issue. Upgrading to 2007A PL15 or above may avoid such issues relevant with the error 'Error in updating OBNK Table'.
Regards,
Candice Ren
SAP Business One Forums Team

Reconciliation to verify data in R/3 and BW

Hi Experts,
Can any one explain me how we will maintain reconciliation to verify the data in SAP R/3 and SAP BW are same or not after the data loads. Please explain all the sources that we have.
Thanks in advance
Mallik

For Unit Test, you don't need to reconcile all the records. So, I take a couple of selections. Using these, go to RSA3 in R/3 and extract the data and take sub-totals in Excel.
Now, go to Info Provider in BW, and using same selections, download the data in BW or BEx and take sub-totals again and compare both.
If the extractor is generic extractor based on View/Tables, you can go one additional step and get data from SE16 in R/3 to make sure RSA3 and Tables also match.
For Business Content extractor, its a little difficult is do this step because most of them are Function Modules.
This should be enough as long as your selections are good.
You can compare the data from RSA3. Run RSA3 and save the data in a file and then compare with BW.
You can compare the PSA data with R/3 to check whether your data transport is correct.But its very much important the end result (with data in Data Targets ex.Infocube...) should be reconciled with the R/3 data to check your update and transfer rules are working fine.
The second part is too tricky since you cannot directly compare the reports while the formats and grouping are different.
You can execute the reports in R/3 and apply the Update and transfer conversions (at least for random records) then reconcile with the BW data.
Take a look on the note: 543188
"How to Reconcile Data Between SAP Source Systems and SAP NetWeaver BI"
The Data Reconciliation procedure is still in the SAP action item for the future release.
But we can reconcile the data by extracting the reports and compare with the query output in Excel sheet.
Please check for a tool "Excel Compare" in google which is really useful in comparing excel files.
https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/servlet/prt/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/7a5ee147-0501-0010-0a9d-f7abcba36b14
https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/servlet/prt/portal/prtroot/com.sap.km.cm.docs/library/biw/how%20to%20validate%20infocube%20data%20by%20comparing%20it%20with%20psa%20data
By this method you can compare your infocube data with PSA ones...clearly, every changes in R/3 (due to user exit or, above all, BW-specific standard logic) is not taken into account...if you want to consider also this part (back-end), there is no std method and it depends from every specific flow!
also check in service.sap.com/bi
https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/servlet/prt/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/7a5ee147-0501-0010-0a9d-f7abcba36b14
One way is to define Remote Cube on the R3 data source and create multiprovider on BW with the Remote Cube and the BW target. Subtract the KF on R3 from the KF in BW - anything not 0 becomes an exception.
Sometimes the source on R3 is not as straight forward and we have had ABAP developers create summary table on R3 to compare to BW.
Actually one to one Data comparison between R/3 and BW is done during Integration Test phase. During this time we need to sit with R/3 team and work closely because they know exactly the numbers in R/3 side and which tables Data resides and all. After loading Data same data in to BW we compare the numbers between R/3 BW. If both the teams feel there is some data missing then we start the analysis. As a first stem we will see in the extractors then BW side during transformation like transfer and update rules.
Pleases see this document for more help
https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/servlet/prt/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/968dab90-0201-0010-c093-9d2a326969f1
https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/servlet/prt/portal/prtroot/com.sap.km.cm.docs/library/biw/how%20to%20validate%20infocube%20data%20by%20comparing%20it%20with%20psa%20data
verifying the data which is coming from R/3 to BW system. That is called as Reconciliation.
That process is done with v lookup functionality.
Hope this helps and assihn points, if so
Regards
Raja

Reconciliação interna com IRF no Pagamento

Bom dia pessoal,
Estou precisando uma uma ajuda. Não vou colocar valores reais, mas vou explicar o que está acontecendo. Meu cliente passou o teto do imposto retido configurado nos detalhes da empresa no contas à pagar (R$ 5.000). Toda nota que ele fizer neste mes, sujeito a IRF, será contabilizado. Digamos que ele tenha feito uma Nota fiscal de Entrada no valor de R$ 100,00 com um imposto retido de 5% configurado para retenção no pagamento. O sistema só irá contabilizar esse imposto quando ele for pagar pelo contas à pagar. O problema é que meu cliente não está realizando o pagamento pelo contas à pagar. Ele fez um lançamento contábil confrontando o PN com uma conta caixa no valor de R$ 100. Na hora de efetuarmos a reconciliação da NFE com o lançamento contábil o sistema critica pois, na verdade, ele deve pagar R$ 95 reais e não os R$ 100. A mensagem é esta "Usar o mesmo código de imposto retido na fonte da categoria de pagamento para todas as transações durante a reconciliação " . Como devo proceder?

Boa tarde,
Neste caso, é necessário fazer um contas a pagar para a nota em questão. Dessa forma, o sistema irá fazer a retenção do valor do imposto e a reconciliação será feita automaticamente, não sendo necessário o lançamento contábil.
Att.,
Tiago Miranda.

Reconciliação Interna / Imposto Retido na Fonte

Boa tarde,
Estou tentando fazer uma reconciliação Interna para um PN (Fornecedor) e é exibida a seguinte mensagem de erro no rodapé do SAP B1:
"O imposto retido na fonte tem de ser processado para pelo menos uma das transações selecionadas. Isto só é possivel restingindo a reconciliação a transações com o mesmo código IRF."
O que pode estar havendo?
Obrigado.

Bom dia,
Estou com este mesmo problema. Ninguém mais passou por esta situação?

What is difference between Reconciliation Account and Revenue account.?`

What is difference between Reconciliation Account and Revenue account.?
Where does it effects after a sales order , delivery doc. or billing doc.?

Hello Mukesh the comments givan by Amol and Siva kumar are correct.
Here I am telling you how these accouts arer wrking in sales order and at billing and delivery.
Our reconsilation account is reconsile with customer that why when you create the sales order you are mentioning the customer at this time reconsiation account works.
Whenever you doing any posting there is an accounting entry is mae in accounts book right .
At the time of Delivery and billing both the accounts are affected as per the accounting rule .
I hpoe this will you help you
Regards
ravi

RFINDEX - Errors in section Reconciliation INDEX vs BSEG

Hi Experts,
After converting a normal GL account into OIM, we have executed the report RFINDEX for consistency check.
We have found errors in the section Reconciliation INDEX vs BSEG.
But I am not sure what exactly the system trying to make me understand and the list of documents that got affected.
Analysis log says that error msg appears at XBLNR field in BSEG & BSIS table.
However, we do not find the field in BSEG table. Then why the system is showing it as "error msg "?
May I request the forum to throw some light and route me towards solution for overcoming the issue?
Regards,
BSK..

Hi Surya,
Please note first of all that the repair option in RFINDEX is only available for use SAP Support. We never recommend that customers or general systems users use this report in repair mode themselves. It can lead to further inconsistencies if used incorrectly.
The error you have seen on this account related to XBLNR is arising because there are differences in the values when comparing the contents of field BKPF-XBLNR and BSIS-XBLNR for a particular set of line items. The XBLNR field is in the header table BKPF and not BSEG.
This error is usually a non critical error and can occur when customising settings such as user exits, substitutions update the XBLNR field in one table (eg BKPF) but not in another (eg BSIS). In these types of situations we usually advise customers to first take time in understanding why the values are updated for XBLNR in their system; the field is highly customizable and therefore errors like this can often appear in systems when running RFINDEX. There is no bug in the standard system which causes these types of differences.
The good news is that this error has nothing to do with the open item management which you enabled. Otherwise you would see error messages like "XOPVW" etc. From your description it seems that the conversion to Open Item Management you did was successful.
Kind regards,
Declan

AP PO Reconciliation Report

Hello everyone
In the attached sample of AP PO reconciliation report, there is a balance for PO but none for AP. Does it mean that no invoices were raised for that particular PO?

Hello,
Between Receiving and Invoicing, this report should print accrual account with a net balance not equal to zero in a summarized (so, this include, for example, Quantities differ between receipts and invoices, unit price differences, ... POs invoiced but not received)
Now, for the case you reported, and assuming that full matching (billing) was occurred run the Accrual Reconciliation Load Run again to clear out POs from report.
Thank you

Trial balance reconciliation a/c mismatch

hi all
iam having an error in trial balance in sap
the trial balance total of vendor reconciliation 13000600 in coming 14943287.90 in total but when iam going to f.42 and take out the total of that particular reconciliation a/c the total is 15003287.9 in vendor balance report there is an excess of 60000 here
please suggest what could be the problem.
in which report i can see the bifurcation of 13000600
Kind regards'
Aman

Hi Aman,
Please check the details of the entries at table level for table LFB1. You can through transaction SE16 for that. There you can find whether any different reconciliation accounts are involved in this.
Warm regards,
Murukan Arunachalam

Notification for reconciliation events.

I have configured the task in the Design console for receiving the email notification for the recon events (insert and update) for xellerate User process form.
The steps that I followed are:
In the Design Console add the email notification information in the Reconciliation Insert Received (or Reconciliation Update Received) process task for Xellerate User:
a. Open Process Management - Process Definition and query for "Xellerate User"
b. Double-click on the box to the left of the task "Reconciliation Insert Received" (or "Reconciliation Update Received").
c. In the pop-up window, click on the Assignment tab and configure to use the default rule, target type User, and set the "User" column to the login of the user who should receive the email notifications.
d. Click on the Notification tab and check the "Assignee" checkbox, set the status to "C" for Completed, and then set the Email column to the email template to send.
I have setup the Email Server IT Resource as well as the email Ids.Still I am not receiving any emails for the events.
Am i doing something wrong in the design console configuration?
Any help is appreciated.Thanks

In Assignment tab - As you have configured assignment of this user to some user, you can configure email as follow
Scroll right - provide email template name under "Email Name", click on check box "Send Email"
Run PurgeCache.sh after these changes.

Report for Reconciliation of serial number -Need Table help

Hi all,
I am working on Report to get info on "Reconciliation of serial number"
The business flow is as below: (Transaction MIGO)
1.     Receipt of Gas Cylinder u2013 (Mvt type 501M)
2.     Transfer Cylinder to Production dept.- (Mvt type 311M)
3.     Transfer empty Cylinder to Empty storage location after utilization u2013 (Mvt type 312M)
4.     Empty Cylinder return to Vendor u2013 (Mvt type 502M)
I want to know No. of days between step 1. Gas Cylinder receipt (Mvt 501M) and step 4. Return of empty Cylinder to Vendor (Mvt 502M) based on selection --> Material, Serial No, Vendor, Plant
I have analyzed few Tables:
1. MKPF   ->   (Material movement Dates)
2. MSEG ->   (Plant, Storage location)
3. EQUI    ->   (Equipment, Material and Serial Number link)
But unable to find out link between MSEG and EQUI.... Can you please help me to find out link?
(P.S.: I have checked IQ09 transaction as well but not getting required information.)

Hello
Look on the tables OBJK and SER03 . Here you should have the link to EQUI via field OBJK-OBKNR, OBJK-EQUNR and MSEG via fields SER03-OBKNR, SER03-MBLNR, SER03-MJAHR, SER03-ZEILE
Edited by: Piotr Dudzik on May 25, 2010 4:58 PM

Bank Reconciliation Statement

Hi Friends,
I require some information on BRS. I've not done that until now and I'm supposed to give an end user training on the same.
My issue is I need the steps that I need to teach the end users, like:
if I go to FF67, we have an option called Statement number, when I'm randomly entering a number like 1, it is not accepting and says opening and closing balances not found for the statement number.
I'm highly confused to go further.
I'd appreciate if someone would give me some info on ,like what are the prerequisites before i could go ahead and use FF67. what is import data using ff_5
Regards
Sandhya

Hi,
in FF67 transaction code you have to put all the required fields. for opening balance you have to give the pervious month's closing balance as opening balance for this month.if you are going for BRS for the month novenber then you have to put the closing balance of october as aopening balance of november.
As you going for the first time give sap balance as it was suggested in the above paragraph and put the closing balance November (as per the bank statement)..........after doing of couple bank statement reconciliation you can see the bank balance(as per bank statement) will mathch to the main account balance(sap system),,,,,,,,,,then it will be easy to take opening balance from Overview Tab (new statement).
after this you have press enter to go the next page you have to plot the individual figures in combination with transaction key have been customized for incoming , outgoing, bank charges etc.
remember that at the below of the second page will be Dr = Cr after the plotting the transactions(as per bank statement) for the month which you are doing BRS ............then press cntrl+s (twice Ecc5.0& ecc6.0 version)
If the posting is successful, the Brs items will remain the sub accounts (incoming and outgoing) and These sub accounts show those entries,which will flow from the sub account which are not cleared
in the bank statement .
Bank Main account balance is the actual balance as per the bank statement whereas the Bank sub accounts denote the reconciliation items.
with Regards,
Sudipto

Whts the corresponding BW report for AP Liability Reconciliation report?

HI All,
Whts the corresponding BW report for AP Liability Reconciliation report?
R/3 report is: S_ALR_87012082 u2013 provides vendor balances that make this up.
Whts the BW report for validating the R/3 data.
Please Reply.
Thansk in Advance.

Hi,
Yes, I was getting partial results. I got rid of it by unchecking the the options in the 'SQL' tab in the Universe parameters.
Thanks for the help.
Regards,
Alok.

FI CO Reconciliation

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for