FIELD VALIDATION PROBLEM

Hello Experts,
CASE SY-UCOMM.
WHEN 'PUSH'.
CLEAR : ZRG23OPGBAL , WA_RG23OPGBAL.
ZRG23OPGBAL = WA_RG23OPGBAL.
SELECT SINGLE * FROM ZRG23OPGBAL WHERE EXGRP = WA_RG23OPGBAL-EXGRP.
IF SY-SUBRC = 0.
MESSAGE 'EXCISE GROUP ALREADY EXISTS' TYPE 'E'.
ELSEIF SY-SUBRC <> 0.
INSERT ZRG23OPGBAL.
IF SY-SUBRC = 0.
MESSAGE 'RECORD CREATED SUCESSFULLY' TYPE 'I'.
ENDIF.
ENDIF.
CLEAR : WA_RG23OPGBAL.
ENDCASE.
The above is my coding , here i have a problem ie. when ever a error message is returned , all the field becomes inactive and i am not able to enter any value into that field. So please kindly help me how i can get rid of it.
Thanks in Advance.

Hi Arun,
You can make a small change in the code to make it work in the way you intend to.
In the message that you are displaying in the Code, you can display it like Error.
So, Create a message class in SE91. Store the messages there according to your requirement.
In the code you write this.
MESSAGE S001(your_message_class) DISPLAY LIKE 'E'.
With this the user will get back the screen processing and unlike an Error message this will not lock the screen.
Let me know if this solves your requirement.
Hope this will help.
Thanks,
Samantak.

Similar Messages

Field Validation on Custom Obj. 4: Value of one field making other Req.

Hello All,
I have been working on a field validation problem for a while. I have a custom Picklist on CO4. This picklist has two values YES and NO (a checkbox does not meet requirements). What I need to do is If Picklist='YES' then FieldA, FieldB, and FieldC are Required else they are not required. FieldA = Text (short), FieldB = Date, and FieldC = Currency. I've tried numerous ways to validate on Fields A, B, and C with statements like IIf(Picklist=LookupValue(Picklist,"YES"),FieldA<>NULL,FieldA) or IIf(FieldValue(Picklist)="YES",FieldA<>NULL,FieldA) etc... these were just my latest attempts at this point I'm jsut trying random things to try to get it working. I am probably using incorrect syntax (even though it passes the sytax checker). If anyone has any suggestion let me know. Also if I haven't made clear what it is I'm attempting to do let me know and I'll try to clarify.
Thanks,
Z

Hi,
if I understand correctly, you want this functionality:
If Picklist = NO => it doesn't matter what values are contained in Field A, B and C.
If Picklist = YES => Field A is not null and Field B is not null and Field C is not null
To trigger the validation when the picklist value changes then you have to configure the Field Validation for the Picklist:
[<Picklist>]=LookupValue("Picklist","NO") OR ( Len([<Field_A>])>0 AND Len([<Field_B>])>0 AND Len([<Field_C>])>0 )
You have to put the validation also on Field_A and Field_B and Field_C, because in case of an update of , let's say, Field_B, you should prevent that Field_B is blanked.
If someone updates only Field_B and he doesn't change the value of the Picklist, the validation expression put on the Picklist is not evaluated.
Simona

Trying to create a Field Validation Expression and need help

I have a picklist field and another field that are in question. I want to set some sort of rule that forces the second field to be populated only If specific values are selected from the picklist field.
I was going the route of a field validation Rule, but everything i've tried so far does not produce the results i am trying to achieve.
The first type of expression i tried was:
([<plProduction_Print_Account_Category_ITAG>] <> LookupValue("OCC_CUST_LOV_ACCOUNT_1", "No Production Print") AND ([<stSIC_Code_ITAG>] IS NULL))
This is generating the field validation error message when i select any of the correct values from the picklist. the problem is still the second field, which will generate the error if a value is entered into the second field, regardless of the picklist value selected. Switching the "IS NULL" to "IS NOT NULL" only reverses the problem on the second field, causing the error to generate when the second field is updated to a NULL or blank value.
I also tried :
= 'No Production Print' AND [<stSIC_Code_ITAG>] IS NOT NULL
and got similar results.
([<plProduction_Print_Account_Category_ITAG>] = LookupValue("OCC_CUST_LOV_ACCOUNT_1", "No Production Print"))
Similar results as well.
Does this need to be an IIF statement? Do I need to make this a workflow expression instead? i could really use some help as I have tried everything i can think of and admit, i'm not the expression guru!!!. Any assistance would be appreciated.
TeknoMan

Yes we have the same request and we used the following expression. Example we have a field "Método de pago" ( [<plMtodo_de_pago_ITAG<]), it's values are "CHEQUE and DEPOSITO" if we select DEPOSITO three more fields were requiered Route, Sucursal de banco and Clabe so we have to put this validation in the four fields including Metodo de pago.
[<plMtodo_de_pago_ITAG>] <> "DEPOSITO" OR ([<Route>] IS NOT NULL AND [<nSucursal_de_banco_ITAG>] IS NOT NULL AND [<stCLABE_ITAG>] IS NOT NULL)
well in the field CLABE we put the following [<plMtodo_de_pago_ITAG>] <> "DEPOSITO" OR ([<Route>] IS NOT NULL AND [<nSucursal_de_banco_ITAG>] IS NOT NULL AND [<stCLABE_ITAG>] IS NOT NULL AND Len([<stCLABE_ITAG>])=18) this was because the len of the value must be 18 characters.
I hope this works for you
Regards Catalina Valadez
Edited by: CatalinaV on 12/03/2009 10:54 AM
Edited by: CatalinaV on 12/03/2009 10:55 AM

Field Validation on Read Only Field

I'm trying to create a pop up error box if a field contains null values. The problem is that the field I'm trying to do the validation on is a read-only field. It's the Account field on the Contact Object or Module. It won't allow me to include validation. The goal here is to have a POP UP ERROR box come up if someone does not select a value for that field. Making it required doesn't generate a popup box, it only has a small "required" text next to the field which can be easily missed by a user. Any ideas?

Hi !
I found the way to do what you wan't, but it sounds a bit strange for me...
You have to put a field validation on the Account Id field. I made some tests to know what is in the AccountId field when it's blank and i see that the value is "No Match Row Id" !!
So your validation rule must be simply
*<> "No Match Row Id"*
It worked for me, the error message appears... But I think this is something we have to report to Oracle...
Hope this will help, feel free to ask more !
Max

Bypass Required Field Validation when needed in PDF Dynamic Form

I faced a tricky situation, where some fields are required, but we need to allow bypass required (mandatory) validation rule when saving the form, and require to fill such fields when submitting the form. In other words, provide flexible control when to turn On / Off this feature.
I wanted to implement a flexible solution, and I will post my findings here. Appreciate your feedback for improvements.
Steps:
1. Mark rquired fields as required.
2. Specify "Empty Message" as "This field cannot be left blank", or similar.
3. Specify "Validation Script Message" as "This field must have a proper value before submit", or similar.
4. Create a Global Form Level Variable something like "StopTotalValidation" and default as "1" means by default, Turn Off Validation for some cases.
5. For the fields which require this type of control, add the script (to be defined later) on the "validate" event:
myTools.validateForRequiredField(this);
6. Create a Script Object "myTools" and add the following script:
function initStringFunc() {
//call this function on Document Initialize
String.prototype.trim = function() {
    return this.replace(/^\s+|\s+$/g,"");
String.prototype.ltrim = function() {
    return this.replace(/^\s+/,"");
String.prototype.rtrim = function() {
    return this.replace(/\s+$/,"");
String.prototype.isEmpty = function() {
    return (this == null) || this.trim() == "";
function setNodeProperty(theNode, theProperty, newValue) {
   if (theNode[theProperty] != newValue) {
        theNode[theProperty] = newValue;
function isNodePropertyEmpty(theNode, theProperty) {
    var result;
    if (theNode == null || theNode[theProperty] == null) {
        result = true;
    } else {
        result = theNode[theProperty].isEmpty();
    return result;
function disableTotalValidation() {
    StopTotalValidation.value = "1";
function enableTotalValidation() {
    StopTotalValidation.value = "0";
function isTotalValidationOn() {
    return StopTotalValidation.value != "1";
function isTotalValidationOff() {
    return StopTotalValidation.value == "1";
const conRequired = "(required)";
function validateForRequiredField(theFld) {
    // Bypass Required Field Validation when Global Validation is Off.
    var result=false;
    if (theFld) {
        if (theFld.mandatory && theFld.mandatory == "error") {
            if (myTools.isNodePropertyEmpty(theFld, "rawValue")) {
                myTools.setNodeProperty(theFld, "rawValue", conRequired);
            if (isTotalValidationOn()) {
                if (isNodePropertyEmpty(theFld, "rawValue") || theFld.rawValue.toLowerCase() == conRequired.toLowerCase()) {
                    result = false;
                } else {
                    result = true;
            } else {
                result = true;
    } else {
        result = false;
    return result;
7. Now, on the click of "Save" button call the function "disableTotalValidation()" and on the click of "Submit" button call the function "enableTotalValidation()".
I have just finished implementing the above solution, and as per my initial testing, it is working fine.
I will post this to my Google Docs workspace, and provide updates their.
Tarek.

Hi Tarek,
I see what you mean in relation to clarity if you used the form variable approach. It was only a suggestion. Like so many things in LC, there is more than one way to finding a solution to a problem.
The triple equal sign (===) is testing if the condition is equal, but to a higher standard. It is testing if the values are identical to each other. For example if you were testing if a textfield was empty, with Equality (==) you might have this:
if (this.rawValue == null || this.rawValue == "") {
     // Some script
If you use Identity (===) you can do the same thing with less script:
if (this.rawValue === null) {
     // Some script
It is also useful when testing the value of an object, but also the type (eg string, number, Boolean).
Lastly, it can be used for non-identity (!==).
In relation to createNode() etc, apart from John's blog, it is covered in the LC documents: http://www.adobe.com/support/documentation/en/livecycle/documentation.html. Look for the scripting guides and the guide to the XML Form Object Model.
Good luck,
Niall

Currency field validation

Hi All,
For SRM-MDM catalog workflow, I want to write a currency field validation to find out the catalog item data records where difference between the original price and the new price for the same catalog item data is greater than 1%.
So as a precursor to the final validation expression, I wrote a very primitive validation expression like:
IF((Contract Price.Amount - [Original].Contract Price.Amount)>1,FALSE,TRUE)
And I was expecting that this should return a FALSE boolean value whenever difference is greater than 1. But surprisingly, irrespective of the difference in the amount, it always returns a TRUE value.
I am wondering whether it is a problem with the validation expression or is it a bug? I am working on SAP MDM 5.5 SP04 Patch 02 (5.5.63.71).
Any suggestions would be appreciated.
Thanks,
Satyen

Hi Nisha,
Thank you for your reply.
As I had mentioned in my previous post, irrespective of whether, amount value is incremented or decremented, it always returns FALSE.
Syntactically and logically, your validation expression is correct but still it always return an error message (a FALSE value).
What do you reckon, is it a bug in the MDM software?
Regards,
Satyen

Reg Missing Field Validation Message

Hello All,
I am trying to use field validation for making a field required when a specific value from a pick list is chosen, i am using this with a custom object.
i have written the Field Validation:
IIf(([<plStatus_of_Search_ITAG>] = 'Completed' AND [<stTechnology_ITAG>] IS NULL),N,[<stTechnology_ITAG>])
and typed some error message and saved the field, signed off and signed in
after that the validation is not getting triggered and when i checked the fiels validation textbox, i found the "Field Validation" condition and "Field Validation Error Message" missing. why is this happening?
as i have saved them.. what might be the problem.
regards,
Uday

Hi Arvindh,
The issue was solved after i cleared cookies and offline client, i was a browser issue.
Thanks.

MX8 IE7 field validation issue

I'm having a problem with using CFFORM and simple field
validation -- by simple, I mean simply setting required="YES" on a
CFINPUT field. The JavaScript that CF8 generates is something like:
quote:
if( !_CF_hasValue(_CF_this['CompanyName'], "TEXT", false )
apparently this is invalid in IE7. CF5 generated the above
as:
quote:
if( !_CF_hasValue(_CF_this.CompanyName, "TEXT", false ) )...
this is valid in IE7.
Help!

Nevermind! A naming problem. For some unknow reason, the form
name was hardcoded to "CFFORM_1". This creates a naming conflict if
there are multiple forms that are unnamed because CF will name the
first unnamed form "CFForm_1" -- boom!
Unfortunately, CF nor JavaScript warns you of this collision.
I hope this helps someone else.

Avoiding Manadatory Field Validation

Hello,
I require to populate a few fields based on a value selected from a dropdown. However, I am using a custom screen with all manadatory fields, hence getting stuck with mandatory field validation.
I tried using AT EXIT-COMMAND in PAI, but then the selected value is not passed, and hence the population of screen fields is not happening.
Any suggestion for me?
Regards
Prasenjit Mitra
Pune, India

HI Prasenjit
The manadatory validation has the more priority so it will not allow any other statements to process.
Instead fo going for Obligatory addition for that parameter you can validate it manually in the PAI event like
If <parameter> is initial.
message e001(zer). --->show error message
else
<code>
endif
HI
the problem is you can use AT EXIT-COMMAND but you cant pass the value at the same time. so i suggest you to use the validation using coding by which you can pass the value
regards
kishore
Message was edited by: Harikishore Sreenivasulu

UIX - unable to turn off client and server side field validation

Hello,
I've scoured the forums for info on how to turn off client / server side field validation, for the very common case of a Cancel button. Here's the use case:
User enters a page displaying records of some kind that can be edited, or an option to create a new one. User clicks create, is taken to a new data entry form. Before entering any data, the user decides he isn't interested, and clicks the cancel button.
The problem I'm having is that I'm getting messages that required fields have no values. I have found several references on this forum that setting the submitButton attribute unvalidated="true" will turn off client side validation. Here's what my submitButton looks like:
<submitButton text="Cancel" event="success" unvalidated="true"/>
But I am still getting errors, such as:
JBO-27014: Attribute ListName in DealerListAppModule.WebDlrListsView1 is required
Now I have also seen references in the forums to turning off server side validation by overriding the validatModelUpdates method in the DataAction. I have done this too. No luck.
Any ideas why this isn't working? I have seen other posts in the forums stating that there were improvements in JDev 10.1.2 that caused a create but not insert, where you could just navigate away from the page you were on, without having to worry about rolling back the create of a new record. I am also not seeing this behavior either. I am using 10.1.2, completely updated, but when I execute a create, if I navigate back from the create page to the original one without saving (i had to fool with this to get it to work because of the validation problems above), I am still seeing the blank, created record in my rowset. I originally created my project in 9.0.5.2, but am now using 10.1.2, and having migrated the project.
So what's the deal? What's the definitive way to turn off both client side and server side validation, and what's the status of this create but not insert functionality?
Brad

Haven't worked with this but possibly this method of "deactivation" is not valid in 11gR2? Have you cross checked that with Oracle support?

Mandatory field validation error occurs when user cancels out of blank "cre

Hi - I'm building an application using Oracle 10g 9.0.5.2, with ADF/UIX/Struts.
I followed the technique described in the tutorial
http://otn.oracle.com/obe/obe9051jdev/uixtutorial/lesson_uix.htm
In that example they have a page called BrowseDeptEmp. On this page is a
create button, which is linked to a /createEmpAction before displaying the
FormEmp uix page, where the user is supposed to enter new employee data.
So I did the same thing, but I added a cancel button on the FormEmp.uix page.
If the user presses cancel on the FormEmp page, it goes through a 'rollback' DataAction (with a rollback operation dragged on it) and then back
to the main page.
here's my problem:
If the user
1. clicks the create button on the BrowseDeptEmp page
2. Sees the blank form in the FormEmp page
3. Changes his mind (does not want to add a new employee) and clicks cancel
The FormEmp page displays validation errors on the fields that are mandatory in the DB! So the user
can't cancel out of the create page unless he fills in the mandatory fields...!!
How do I cancel out of a create page 1) without entering any data on the page and 2) without getting
mandatory field validation messages?
It must be simple but i can't figure it out....
Please help :)
Thanks
Des

I don't understand how this can happen if the user has not entered any data.
Is there a commit action somewhere that is being triggered before the rollback?
is your cancel button a submit button?
one way to fix this is to convert the submit button into a
regular button and have the regular button go directly to your DataAction (the one with the rollback).
you can automatically create this button by drawing a pageLink from the page to the DataAction in the page flow diagram.

Need field validation help

I have read the all documentation, but still cannot get what I believe is a simple field validation to work properly. Can somebody assist?
Here is the situation. I have two fields: one is a checkbox and the other an integer field. ( If the integer field is 0 or null ) AND (the checkbox is not checked or null) then we need to show the user an error message. Seems simple. I’m trying to take baby steps to get this to work so I understand it, but have not been successful.
I know the message only triggers if the validation equates to False. I believe that field validations trigger whenever a record is save no matter if the field that has the validation was changed. If this is not correct, please advise.
Starting out simple: I added the follow validation to the checkbox field: [<integerField>] <> 0 The data in the UI clearly shows a 0 in this field, but when I update the record, the error message is not display. Can somebody explain why? Is my syntax wrong?
I need to understand how to correctly compose the field validations and also how to account for ‘null values’.
Any help would be greatly appreciated.
I also tried this on the checkbox field: ( [<checkboxfield>] LTGT 'Y' AND [<Integerfield>] = 0 ) but again it does not display message. LTGT = < >
I wish Oracle had a webnair on how to write field validations. :)
Thanks.

Validation can be a trial and error exercise. There are a couple of key points to remember.<ul><li>First, always check the sytax before saving. This will only catch some very basic issues, but it can helpful.</li><li>Second, always click save for the Field Edit before testing. I know I forget to do this half the time, and it can be frustrating to find out that the validation would have worked if you had saved the change to the field.</li><li>Another key is to allow for the validation to be skipped during integration or by administrators. This can be managed with the ExcludeChannel() and UserValue() functions.</li><li>Finally, there are a couple of key points to be understood about when field validation rules will fire. The following circumstances prevent a field validation expression from being evaluated:<ul><li>A field is left blank when the record is created. Field validation does not force a value to be required.</li><li>A field has a pre-existing invalid value, and it is not changed when it is updated.</li></ul></li></ul>
With all of that said, let's discuss your problem. I think you want the validation to work as follows: <ul><li>If the number is greater than zero, do nothing</li><li>If the number is less than or equal to zero or null, then check to see if the flag is checked. If the flag is checked, do nothing, otherwise give a message.</li></ul>
If that is true, you have a nested IIf statement. The statement would be similar to the one below. This would be for the number field, and you would repeat the same for the checkbox field. Note that in this expression, I am returning the value for the field being validated.
IIf([<IndexedNumber0>] > 0,[<IndexedNumber0>],IIf([<IndexedBoolean0>]='Y',[<IndexedNumber0>],"Invalid"))
Good Luck,
Thom

How can I do field validation on the last two characters of a text field?

I have a text field. The user is required to enter the last two characters as numbers. I want to apply validation on this field. How can i achieve the same?
EX: If the user enter ABCDE, an error messgae stating the last two digit should be numeric.
I tried using the below in the field validation which did not work.
(0+Right([<ExternalSystemId>],2)) > 0 AND (0+Right([<ExternalSystemId>],2)) < 99.
Any ideas would help?

Try this-
FindOneOf(Right([<Field1>],"2"),"abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz")=0
rgds,
Amit

Mandatory field validation on Page links.

We have created a Portal application where we included different applications as taskflows. We have also created a tabbed interface which helps us to communicate from one task flow to another taskflow. When we are in one page of taskflow and try to move to another page of different taskflow using tabbed interface we receive mandatory field validation error which prevents us to move to any other page until we fill all the mandatory fields. We need to move to different page of taskflow by using the tabbed interface even without filling all the necessary mandatory fields. Can anyone help us to resolve this issue as this is very important for our project.

<b>Layout</b>
<%@page language="abap" %>
<%@extension name="htmlb" prefix="htmlb" %>
<htmlb:content design="design2003" >
<htmlb:page title="Check Pernr " >
    <htmlb:form>
      <htmlb:textView text   = "Personnel No."
                      design = "EMPHASIZED" />
      <htmlb:inputField id    = "pernr"
                        value = "<%= lv_pernr %>" />
<%
if lv_no_pernr = 'X'.
%>
<script language="Javascript">
alert ("Personnel no. is not Valid")
</script>
<%endif.%>
   </htmlb:form>
</htmlb:page>
</htmlb:content>
<b>ONINPUTPROCESSING</b>
DATA: l_pernr TYPE persno.
DATA: data TYPE REF TO cl_htmlb_inputfield.
data ?= cl_htmlb_manager=>get_data( request = runtime->server->request
                                         name     = 'inputField'
                                         id       = 'pernr' ).
IF data IS NOT INITIAL.
    l_pernr = data->value.
ENDIF.
CLEAR lv_no_pernr.
SELECT SINGLE pernr FROM pa0000 INTO l_pernr WHERE pernr EQ lv_pernr.
IF sy-subrc NE 0.
lv_no_pernr = 'X'.
ENDIF.
<b>PAGE ATTRIBUTES</b>
lv_no_pernr     TYPE     FLAG
lv_pernr     TYPE     PERSNO
hope this helps.
A

Weblogic Portal: Error While Deploying: VALIDATION PROBLEMS WERE FOUND

Hello friends
I am getting following error while deploying EAR on server.
“Module named 'MyEAR' failed to deploy. See Error Log view for more detail.”
Steps I followed:
1: Created one portal domain successfully and was able to start the serve after thatr.
2: Created one Portal EAR Project and added it on server.
Now when I am restarting the server, getting following error/log
**“weblogic.management.DeploymentException: VALIDATION PROBLEMS WERE FOUND**
**problem: cvc-complex-type.2.4c: Expected element 'module@http://java.sun.com/xml/ns/javaee' before the end of the content in element application@http://java.sun.com/xml/ns/javaee:<null>”**
Exception stack Trace:
java.lang.Exception: Exception received from deployment driver. See Error Log view for more detail.
at oracle.eclipse.tools.weblogic.server.internal.WlsJ2EEDeploymentHelper$DeploymentProgressListener.watch(WlsJ2EEDeploymentHelper.java:1566)
at oracle.eclipse.tools.weblogic.server.internal.WlsJ2EEDeploymentHelper.deploy(WlsJ2EEDeploymentHelper.java:470)
at oracle.eclipse.tools.weblogic.server.internal.WeblogicServerBehaviour.publishWeblogicModules(WeblogicServerBehaviour.java:1346)
at oracle.eclipse.tools.weblogic.server.internal.WeblogicServerBehaviour.publishToServer(WeblogicServerBehaviour.java:803)
at oracle.eclipse.tools.weblogic.server.internal.WeblogicServerBehaviour.publishOnce(WeblogicServerBehaviour.java:623)
at oracle.eclipse.tools.weblogic.server.internal.WeblogicServerBehaviour.publish(WeblogicServerBehaviour.java:516)
at org.eclipse.wst.server.core.model.ServerBehaviourDelegate.publish(ServerBehaviourDelegate.java:708)
at org.eclipse.wst.server.core.internal.Server.publishImpl(Server.java:2690)
at org.eclipse.wst.server.core.internal.Server$PublishJob.run(Server.java:272)
at org.eclipse.core.internal.jobs.Worker.run(Worker.java:55)
Caused by: weblogic.management.DeploymentException: VALIDATION PROBLEMS WERE FOUND
problem: cvc-complex-type.2.4c: Expected element 'module@http://java.sun.com/xml/ns/javaee' before the end of the content in element application@http://java.sun.com/xml/ns/javaee:<null>
at weblogic.application.internal.EarDeploymentFactory.findOrCreateComponentMBeans(EarDeploymentFactory.java:193)
at weblogic.application.internal.MBeanFactoryImpl.findOrCreateComponentMBeans(MBeanFactoryImpl.java:48)
at weblogic.application.internal.MBeanFactoryImpl.createComponentMBeans(MBeanFactoryImpl.java:110)
at weblogic.application.internal.MBeanFactoryImpl.initializeMBeans(MBeanFactoryImpl.java:76)
at weblogic.management.deploy.internal.MBeanConverter.createApplicationMBean(MBeanConverter.java:88)
at weblogic.management.deploy.internal.MBeanConverter.createApplicationForAppDeployment(MBeanConverter.java:66)
at weblogic.management.deploy.internal.MBeanConverter.setupNew81MBean(MBeanConverter.java:314)
at weblogic.deploy.internal.targetserver.operations.ActivateOperation.compatibilityProcessor(ActivateOperation.java:81)
at weblogic.deploy.internal.targetserver.operations.AbstractOperation.setupPrepare(AbstractOperation.java:295)
at weblogic.deploy.internal.targetserver.operations.ActivateOperation.doPrepare(ActivateOperation.java:97)
at weblogic.deploy.internal.targetserver.operations.AbstractOperation.prepare(AbstractOperation.java:217)
at weblogic.deploy.internal.targetserver.DeploymentManager.handleDeploymentPrepare(DeploymentManager.java:747)
at weblogic.deploy.internal.targetserver.DeploymentManager.prepareDeploymentList(DeploymentManager.java:1216)
at weblogic.deploy.internal.targetserver.DeploymentManager.handlePrepare(DeploymentManager.java:250)
at weblogic.deploy.internal.targetserver.DeploymentServiceDispatcher.prepare(DeploymentServiceDispatcher.java:159)
at weblogic.deploy.service.internal.targetserver.DeploymentReceiverCallbackDeliverer.doPrepareCallback(DeploymentReceiverCallbackDeliverer.java:157)
at weblogic.deploy.service.internal.targetserver.DeploymentReceiverCallbackDeliverer.access$000(DeploymentReceiverCallbackDeliverer.java:12)
at weblogic.deploy.service.internal.targetserver.DeploymentReceiverCallbackDeliverer$1.run(DeploymentReceiverCallbackDeliverer.java:45)
at weblogic.work.SelfTuningWorkManagerImpl$WorkAdapterImpl.run(SelfTuningWorkManagerImpl.java:516)
at weblogic.work.ExecuteThread.execute(ExecuteThread.java:201)
at weblogic.work.ExecuteThread.run(ExecuteThread.java:173)
Caused by: weblogic.descriptor.DescriptorException: VALIDATION PROBLEMS WERE FOUND
problem: cvc-complex-type.2.4c: Expected element 'module@http://java.sun.com/xml/ns/javaee' before the end of the content in element application@http://java.sun.com/xml/ns/javaee:<null>
at weblogic.descriptor.internal.MarshallerFactory$1.evaluateResults(MarshallerFactory.java:245)
at weblogic.descriptor.internal.MarshallerFactory$1.evaluateResults(MarshallerFactory.java:231)
at weblogic.descriptor.internal.MarshallerFactory$1.createDescriptor(MarshallerFactory.java:155)
at weblogic.descriptor.BasicDescriptorManager.createDescriptor(BasicDescriptorManager.java:323)
at weblogic.application.descriptor.AbstractDescriptorLoader2.getDescriptorBeanFromReader(AbstractDescriptorLoader2.java:788)
at weblogic.application.descriptor.AbstractDescriptorLoader2.createDescriptorBean(AbstractDescriptorLoader2.java:409)
at weblogic.application.descriptor.AbstractDescriptorLoader2.loadDescriptorBeanWithoutPlan(AbstractDescriptorLoader2.java:759)
at weblogic.application.descriptor.AbstractDescriptorLoader2.loadDescriptorBean(AbstractDescriptorLoader2.java:768)
at weblogic.application.ApplicationDescriptor.getApplicationDescriptor(ApplicationDescriptor.java:301)
at weblogic.application.internal.EarDeploymentFactory.findOrCreateComponentMBeans(EarDeploymentFactory.java:178)
as it is ‘brand new ‘ – IDE generated application, weblogic-application.xml is untouched.
Thanks & Regards

I have seen this problem also. To be clear, this occurs straight out of the box. In other words - launch eclipse, create a new workspace, create a new portal EAR project with the wizard, and then try to deploy it without touching anything. In fact, try changing the portal's facets to anything, plain EAR, 11g default, Portal EAR - it doesn't matter. It will not deploy. Either you get this error or you get deployment errors complaining about missing library references in the weblogic-application.xml. Then - you have to do surgery just to get an 'out of the box' portal to run. Very frustrating.

FIELD VALIDATION PROBLEM

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for