First patch for the non-released 9iAS 9.0.4

Today I mentioned the first patch is released for 9ias 9.0.4 (patch 3089193). Strange that Oracle already releases patches for a product that itself has not been released yet. Is it that difficult to implement that patch into the base version? I heard that we may expect 9iAS 9.0.4 around september/october so there should be time enough.

Well -- to respond to the patches...
9.0.2.1 core patchset breaks my Jdev/BC4J application with an error indicating the BC4J tables couldn't be updated
So, I try 9.0.2.2 patch. Can't get past installation instructions (posted message yesterday about this -- no response yet).
javax.naming.CommunicationException: webdev1.softmatic.esoftmatic.com:4031. Root exception is java.lang.IllegalArgumentException: object is not an instance of declaring class
Patches have definitely not helped here.
To be constructive:
1) Looking for 9.0.4 release to allow clustering of OC4J processes even if installed with reports/forms (i.e. allow me to use EM to cluster, even if EM can't cluster the reports servers). It would be nicer to have EM cluster reports services too, but probably need smart way of updating CGICMD.DAT, for example. I could deal with just clustering the OC4J portions, but to prevent me from doing it because I've installed the "business intelligence" is frustrating because I know the capability is there -- I just can't get there because we use the reports too.
2) Looking for text/xml/configuration files on NT to use Windows CRLF (cgicmd.dat, opmn.xml, etc). Annoying, especially since I have to document the installation procedures for disaster recovery and need to include unix to dos type utilities, etc. Getting a real editor isn't my problem, it's the disaster recovery plan where you can't count on people knowing how to deal with it themselves.
3) Looking for way to deploy 9.0.3 JDeveloper BC4J to 9.0.2 safely (docs say you can't)...As a generalization, allow deployment of newer jdev/bc4j libraries with the applications. The "tightness" of BC4J within 9iAS causes issues. Development environments are updated more regularly than production -- hence the ability to fully deploy newer applications to the older app servers is key.
There are probably others... but those topics seem to not come up in the forums.
Jeff

Similar Messages

I am thinking of getting my first Macbook pro for uni and was just wondering which one would be the best? The macbook pro or macbook pro with retina display? or even wait for the new release in 2013 ?

I am thinking of getting my first Macbook pro for uni and was just wondering which one would be the best? The macbook pro or macbook pro with retina display? or even wait for the new release in 2013 ?

If your budget is unlimited, look at both the retina and non-retina and make a decision based on your preferences. If funds are tight, explore the options in the refurbished section. Unless you are dealing with courses that demand specific performance parameters, any one of these options will suffice.
Ciao.

Problem in BOM or component allocation for the Non- codified Item in a PO.

Hi All,
Please advise how to explode a BOM or Assign component in a Purchase order with Item category (L) for a Operation oriented material for which no material code is created from a production order .
Actually in my scenario, no raw material component will send to the Sub -Contract Vendor. Only Assembled operation material lets say operation 20 from a routing ( which is not having material code ) from an In - house production from a shopfloor has to be sent to the vendor to create a operation 30 material , which is also not having a material code." How to explode a BOM or component allocation for the Non- codified Item in a PO".
Kindly give me the IMG settings for the above scenario.
regards,
YK

Hi Prasobh,
Tnx for your suggestion. But, the client external processing routing is not constant activity . Based on the Operation bottlenecks client is sending the operation as external Processing. For Eg., If on first order operation 20 be external , Then in second order operation 20 need not be external. operation 30 may go out for external processing. Client does not want a material code for each operation.
Give your valuable suggestion.
regards,
YK

[svn] 3048: Always map urls through the rootURL property, even for the non-proxy case.

Revision: 3048
Author: [email protected]
Date: 2008-08-29 15:40:17 -0700 (Fri, 29 Aug 2008)
Log Message:
Always map urls through the rootURL property, even for the non-proxy case. This might
change the behavior slightly if you set rootURL on HTTPService for the non-proxy case
as that would have been ignored in the current code path but it seem less consistent.
If rootURL is not set, it defaults to the swf's URL which should give the same relative
URL semantics we get today by default when rootURL is not set.
blazeDS checkintests pass
Modified Paths:
flex/sdk/trunk/frameworks/projects/rpc/src/mx/rpc/http/AbstractOperation.as

Of the second and third scripts, the latter could perhaps be deemed the "most secure"; however, it might block more than you want. If you really want to use one of those, then I'd suggest using the second script. Otherwise, I'd recommend that you take a look here. (I only slightly examined the first script.... I do not understand the language of the comments, and I'm no iptables whiz. )
Also, note that you don't have to use an actual script to set up the rules; rather, you can save the rules you want to a file that will be read by iptables automatically (/etc/iptables/iptables.rules). Here's a modified version of mine:
# /etc/iptables/iptables.rules
# These rules (and the commented instructions) derived from:
# http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=159661
*nat
:PREROUTING ACCEPT [163:50538]
:POSTROUTING ACCEPT [40:2451]
:OUTPUT ACCEPT [40:2451]
COMMIT
*filter
:INPUT ACCEPT [0:0]
:FORWARD ACCEPT [0:0]
:OUTPUT ACCEPT [0:0]
:FIREWALL - [0:0]
:TRUSTED - [0:0]
-A INPUT -j FIREWALL
-A FORWARD -j DROP
-A FIREWALL -m state --state RELATED,ESTABLISHED -j ACCEPT
-A FIREWALL -i lo -j ACCEPT
-A FIREWALL -j TRUSTED
-A FIREWALL -j DROP
# put your own exceptions here, like so (replacing <tcp/udp> with either "tcp" or
# "udp" -- minus the quotes -- and <port number> with the port you'd like to open):
# -A TRUSTED -p <tcp/udp> -m <tcp/udp> --dport <port number> -j ACCEPT
COMMIT
Of course, there are benefits to keeping the rules in a script. For instance, you could then easily set the default iptables rules, allow all traffic, etc. Plus, some firewall-related things (such as the various echo commands in the scripts you provided) cannot (to my knowledge) be done by iptables alone.
If you already have a script that sets up the rules you would like to use, you can save yourself the hassle of creating a rules file by following the directions outlined here.
Last edited by ssjlegendx (2008-08-06 20:17:00)

Patch for the lastest zero day vulnerability

Hi
Microsoft has released a patch for the latest zero day vulnerability. In the page
https://support.microsoft.com/kb/2887505 it is written:
"You must have security update 2870699 installed for this Fix it to provide effective protection against this issue."
Question: What happens if this path is installed and 2870699 has not been installed yet?
a: Will not provide effective protection against this issue before 2870699 has been installed - but work fine when it has been installed?
or
b: Will never provide effective protection against this issue if 2870699 is installed after the fix in 2887505.
Thanks in advance
Best regards Harald

Hi,
This fixit is a appcompat shim, performs as a temporary Advanced Workaround to help protect against attempts to exploit this vulnerability. I think
it is recommended to install the two updates in sequence just as described in the KB.
To better understand this, I’d like to share the following articles with you:
CVE-2013-3893: Fix it workaround available
http://blogs.technet.com/b/srd/archive/2013/09/17/cve-2013-3893-fix-it-workaround-available.aspx
Regards,
Yolanda

Latest PeopleTools patch for the next PeopleTools only upgrade

Hi All,
Is it mandatory to be in the latest PeopleTools patch for the next PeopleTools only upgrade?
For eaxmple, I am in PT8.50 and I plan to upgarde to PT8.51. Is it mandatory to apply the latest patch(PT 8.50.14 Product Patch) before the PeopleTool upgrade?
Thanks
Soundappan

Whether it is not mandatory to be on the latest Peopletools patch for a Peopletools version upgrade, you should be on the least recommanded one if any. It is maybe playing on words, but hope you see the difference.
It is well explained in the following pdf, page 16 :
http://download.oracle.com/docs/cd/E18563_01/psft/acrobat/upt851_091010_upt851.pdf
"+*Download required for upgrade fixes.*+
+Before you start applying this upgrade, check the list of required fixes. It is very important that you+
+download all Required for Upgrade fixes for PeopleSoft PeopleTools. Go to My Oracle Support, Patches+
+& Updates, PeopleSoft, and search for the PeopleSoft PeopleTools Required for Upgrade fixes for your+
+new release.+"
Nicolas.

Non-stock purchase for the non-valuated item

For normal valuated items, if we make it account assigned on PO, it didn't update the inventory on receipt but rather gets charged to the cost object on the PO.
Can we have similar functionality for non-valuated item.
We are having a non-valuated but stock item purchasing scenario. For this we are updating only the quantity of receipt but the value is getting charged to the cost object on PO.
Now user wants to buy same item and charge it to the specific cost object (it's oka upto this point)..AND don't want to update the quanity in inventory.
So in short can we control the no qty. update for the non-valuated item as we can control for valuated item through account-assigned purchasing.

Hi,
But why u need quantity and value both of a material should not be updated ??
Ok...
Create a Material type and go to OMS2 and click Quantity upadating and Value updating in Dialog Structure .Now Check ur valuation Area( example Plant) and do not tick Quantity upadating and Value updating check box.
Now try ur transaction and it will work without affecting quantity and value.
If helpful then reward.
Regards,
Biju K

New Gl- report with some details of CO for the non leading ledger

Hi,
I am using New GL. I have 2 ledgers (local ledger and USGAAP); The local ledger is the leading ledger, so is the one which impacts to CO. I need some information in CO (mainly cost center) for the non-leading ledger (USGAAP). I am thinking in create a report painter with the table of non-leading ledger, but I cannot find a table in NGL which save the CO object and can choose the ledger. I am looking too, this information by a standard report, but I cannot find one.
Any idea about a solution of this situation?
Thanks,
Cecilia

Hi Cecilia, did you assign Cost Center scenario (FIN_CCA) to your ledgers?, otherwise NGL Tables (FAGLFLEXT and FAGLFLEXA) won't have Cost Center field populated. If this is the case, maybe your only option is use BKPF then BSEG + BSEG_ADD (Entry View of Accounting Document for Additional Ledgers) and pull Cost Center from there.
I hope this helps.

Wher can I find the 8.1.7.2 patch for the Sun OS 5.8

I need to find the patch for the Oracle 8.1.7.0 to take it to 8.1.7.2 and it is running on Sun Solaris 5.8. I have looked through the Oracle site but haven't found anything that looks viable.
Thanks
Ted

Which Oracle site did you try? As far as I know the only place you can get the patches is through Oracle's Metalink( metalink.oracle.com ).
I need to find the patch for the Oracle 8.1.7.0 to take it to 8.1.7.2 and it is running on Sun Solaris 5.8. I have looked through the Oracle site but haven't found anything that looks viable.
Thanks
Ted

Questions for the october release

Hey there,
two questions for the october release update:
1. We often use filmconvert in our workflow. Is it possible to send a sequence via Direct Link to SpeedGrade and keep and see the effect?
2. Can I send a sequence with some AfterEffects Dynamic Link pieces in it to SpeedGrade to grade the project or will the connection get lost?
Thanks for your help
Jesko

All effects should come over. No mention about Linked comps, though.
http://tv.adobe.com/watch/adobe-at-ibc-2013/adobe-speedgrade-cc-october-2013-release-overv iew/

Will there be a patch for the security flaw for iMac version 10.6.8.?

Will ther be a patch for the security flaw for iMac version 10.6.8?

What security flaw are you referring to? If you're referring to the recent SSL flaw, that was only present in OS X 10.9.
Regards.

[svn] 3734: Fixing advanced CSS descendant selectors for the alpha release.

Revision: 3734
Author: [email protected]
Date: 2008-10-17 22:13:34 -0700 (Fri, 17 Oct 2008)
Log Message:
Fixing advanced CSS descendant selectors for the alpha release.
- We now check descendant types against any superclass.
- Removed StyleProtoChain.getClassStyleDeclarations()'s recursive "Class" lookup for each superclass of an IStyleClient during the search for type selectors in the hierarchy. This was replaced with a simple describeType-based description (called once per type).
- Added a method to report whether any advanced styles had been registered with the StyleManager to optimize style declaration matching for the default case of simple style declarations.
- Removed advanced selector cache key calculation from StyleProtoChain in favor of the legacy simple type level cache. Future work may be required to cache advanced, display list sensitive style information.
- Fixed the specificity calculation for global selectors.
QE: Yes
Doc: No.
Checkintests: Pass
mxunit styles tests: Pass
select mustella styles tests: Pass
Reviewer: Glenn
Bugs:
SDK-17351 - [Advanced CSS] Descendant selectors don't work for Application
SDK-17361 - [Advanced CSS] If you use descendant and id selectors together, the id selector doesn't work correctly
SDK-17385 - [Advanced CSS] If you use descendant and class selectors together, the class selector doesn't work correctly
Ticket Links:
http://bugs.adobe.com/jira/browse/SDK-17351
http://bugs.adobe.com/jira/browse/SDK-17361
http://bugs.adobe.com/jira/browse/SDK-17385
Modified Paths:
flex/sdk/trunk/frameworks/projects/framework/src/mx/core/UIComponent.as
flex/sdk/trunk/frameworks/projects/framework/src/mx/styles/CSSSelector.as
flex/sdk/trunk/frameworks/projects/framework/src/mx/styles/CSSStyleDeclaration.as
flex/sdk/trunk/frameworks/projects/framework/src/mx/styles/IAdvancedStyleClient.as
flex/sdk/trunk/frameworks/projects/framework/src/mx/styles/IStyleManager3.as
flex/sdk/trunk/frameworks/projects/framework/src/mx/styles/StyleManager.as
flex/sdk/trunk/frameworks/projects/framework/src/mx/styles/StyleManagerImpl.as
flex/sdk/trunk/frameworks/projects/framework/src/mx/styles/StyleProtoChain.as
flex/sdk/trunk/frameworks/projects/framework/src/mx/utils/NameUtil.as
flex/sdk/trunk/modules/compiler/src/java/flex2/compiler/css/StyleDef.vm
flex/sdk/trunk/modules/compiler/src/java/flex2/compiler/css/StyleModule.vm
flex/sdk/trunk/modules/compiler/src/java/flex2/compiler/mxml/gen/ClassDefLib.vm

Is there a patch for the NTP security issue that does not require Xcode?

Is there a patch for the NTP security issue that does not require Xcode? I have an older Intel mini that can't be upgraded beyond 10.6.8 and I currently don't have room for Xcode 3.2.5. Has somebody trustworthy posted these binaries?

NTP fix for Snow Leopard: https://drive.google.com/folderview?id=0BxQCbeIgpA2uVjFiN1h4bGZNQ2c&usp=sharing
You can also go to System Preferences/Date & Time and deselect Set time Automatically.
Snow Leopard users: Turn off automatic date and time in System Preferences immediately

PeopleTools patch for the next PeopleTools only upgarde

Hi All,
Is it mandatory to be in the latest PeopleTools patch for the next PeopleTools only upgrade?
For eaxmple, I am in PT5.0 and I plan to upgarde to PT51. IS it mandatory to apply the latest patch(PT 8.50.14 Product Patch) before the PeopleTool upgrade?
Thanks
Soundappan
Edited by: soundappan on Dec 29, 2010 2:32 PM

Somehow I did not noticed that thread earlier.
It has been cross posted here below :
Latest PeopleTools patch for the next PeopleTools only upgrade
Nicolas.

[svn:fx-trunk] 5269: Remove style metadata for the non-inheriting verticalAlign, paddingLeft, paddingTop, paddingRight, paddingBottom styles.

Revision: 5269
Author: [email protected]
Date: 2009-03-12 11:35:42 -0700 (Thu, 12 Mar 2009)
Log Message:
Remove style metadata for the non-inheriting verticalAlign, paddingLeft, paddingTop, paddingRight, paddingBottom styles.
QE Notes: None
Doc Notes:
Bugs: None
Reviewer: None
tests: checkintests, mustella
Modified Paths:
flex/sdk/trunk/frameworks/projects/flex4/src/mx/components/TextView.as
flex/sdk/trunk/frameworks/projects/flex4/src/mx/graphics/TextBox.as
flex/sdk/trunk/frameworks/projects/flex4/src/mx/graphics/TextGraphic.as
flex/sdk/trunk/frameworks/projects/flex4/src/mx/styles/metadata/BasicTextLayoutFormatStyl es.as
Added Paths:
flex/sdk/trunk/frameworks/projects/flex4/src/mx/styles/metadata/NonInheritingTextLayoutFo rmatStyles.as

Anyone able to help?

First patch for the non-released 9iAS 9.0.4

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for