Frequency of Checkpoint

Hi,
in 10g R2, where else other than Alertlog can I check the frequency of Checkpoint ?
In alertlog I have :
Thread 1 cannot allocate new log, sequence 3064
Checkpoint not complete
I can not see why. Any idea ?
Thank you.
I tried this :
ALTER SYSTEM SET fast_start_mttr_target=20 SCOPE=BOTH;
But in alertlog I saw :
Sun Nov 15 09:55:54 2009
ALTER SYSTEM SET fast_start_mttr_target=20 SCOPE=BOTH;
Sun Nov 15 09:56:10 2009
FAST_START_MTTR_TARGET 20 is out of the valid MTTR range, use 461 instead.
Sun Nov 15 09:57:31 2009

Hi,
The checkpoint frequency is affected by different configuration parameters. The most usual case is the size of redo logs. To use FSMT parameter (which is a straightforward way to control instance time to recover from instance crash and spikes of IO writes during checkpointing), you should use big enough redo logs - to reduce normal checkpoint frequency, and set FSMT to a reasonable value. For instance, suppose that you have 300 MB redo logs and your checkpoint frequency is once in 5 minutes due to log switch. To achieve frequency of once in 10 minutes, you should increase the size of redo logs to 600 MB. Then, if you'd like to make sure that DB crash recovery time is, let's say, 6 minutes, you should set FSMT to 360. Be aware that normal checkpoints due to log swich are not eliminated, they just becomes quicker due to less work to be done. Also remember that FSMT is some sort of "permanent checkpointing" - DBWR performs small writes to advance thread checkpoint, and does it all the time, thus reducing IO spikes by distributing number IO over the period.

Similar Messages

  • Process dbwriter and checkpoint

    Hi,
    It is known that when the redo log buffer is full at the third(1/3) , the datas which are in the redolog buffer are sent to the database's redo log files .
    What happens then with the dbwriter process and the checkpoint process?Is there a new sequence number( SCN=system change number) created when the redo log buffer is sent to the database ?
    Secondly, concerning the log_check_point_interval, can you explain to me what means that "in the number of redo log file blocks that can exist between an incremental checkpoint and the last block written to the redo log. This number refers to physical operating system blocks, not database blocks."
    LOG_CHECKPOINT_INTERVAL specifies the frequency of checkpoints in terms of the number of redo log file blocks that can exist between an incremental checkpoint and the last block written to the redo log. This number refers to physical operating system blocks, not database blocks.
    I don't exactly understand when occurs a log_checkpoint and what means that it concerns operating system blocks and not database blocks.
    Does it mean it concerns the redo log buffer?
    Thanks a lot for your answer.
    Best regards.
    Nathalie

    DBWR does not write dirty buffers to the corresponding disk blocks until the Redo for those blocks (i.e. the changes made to the blocks) has been written by LGWR to the online redo log files. Therefore, Redo is always written to disk before modified blocks (whether they be table or index or undo blocks) are rewritten to disk.
    The block size for online redo log files is NOT the database block size (which is specified by the instance parameter db_block_size). Redo log files are written direct to the OS and use the OS's block size -- which is typically 512bytes.
    Thus, specifying LOG_CHECKPOINT_INTERVAL of, say, 100000 is an instruction to Oracle that "when the current online redo log file is about 50MB (100000 512byte blocks is 48.82125MB) written, issue a Checkpoint to DBWR so that DBWR also writes dirty buffers to disk". That way, every checkpoint interval is actually smaller than the actual online redo log file (a checkpoint will still be issued when the online redo log file is full and a switch logfile occcurs).
    Hemant K Chitale

  • About DBWn & Checkpoint

    Hi All,
    I have a confusion over this two statements .
    DBWn defers writing to the data files until one of the following events occurs:
    • Incremental or normal checkpoint
    Checkpoint
    An event called a checkpoint occurs when the Oracle background process DBWn writes all the modified database buffers in the SGA, including both committed and uncommitted data, to the data files.
    I want to know whether
    DBWn cause Checkpoint to occur
    or
    Checkpoint cause DBWn to occur.
    Regards
    Rama

    DBWn executes most of the checkpoint tasks and CKPT does the rest.
    Checkpoints are triggered by LOG_CHECKPOINT_INTERVAL parameter and redo log switches (from http://download-uk.oracle.com/docs/cd/B19306_01/server.102/b14237/initparams109.htm#sthref455):
    LOG_CHECKPOINT_INTERVAL specifies the frequency of checkpoints in terms of the number of redo log file blocks that can exist between an incremental checkpoint and the last block written to the redo log. This number refers to physical operating system blocks, not database blocks.
    Regardless of this value, a checkpoint always occurs when switching from one online redo log file to another. Therefore, if the value exceeds the actual redo log file size, checkpoints occur only when switching logs. Checkpoint frequency is one of the factors that influence the time required for the database to recover from an unexpected failure.
    Message was edited by:
    Pierre Forstmann

  • Checkpoint interval

    Hi All,
    I m new in oracle can any one tell me what would be the correct answer of this question
    you are attempting to increase the checkpoint interval on your database.Each of the following choices will affect the duaration/or frequency of checkpoint,except one.
    A)size of redo log
    B)number of datafile
    C)LOG_CHECKPOINT_INTERVAL
    D)LOG_CHECKPOINT_TIMEOUT
    thanks in Advance .

    Personally, I don't mind helping out with people doing tests, though I would have thought the answer to this was pretty darn'd obvious. I certainly don't see the point in taking the trouble to write to say you won't take the trouble to reply!
    Parameters that have the word CHECKPOINT in them are likely to have an effect on the rate at which checkpoints happen, don't you think? So that rules out C and D.
    To decide between A and B as the one that has no effect, it would help if you tried to remember what a checkpoint actually is, of course. It's the point in the lifetime of the database when DBWR decides to start flushing dirty buffers to disk. All sorts of things can trigger when that happens: shutting down the instance will do it, for example. So will putting a tablespace into hot backup mode. Dropping a table. Switching redo logs is another...
    Oooh! Now there's a giveaway. If switching redo logs when one has filled up causes a checkpoint, then presumably it will take a lot longer to fill up a big redo log than a small one. Therefore, big logs must slow down the rate of checkpointing and smaller ones must speed it up.
    Which rather means there's only one right answer left, doesn't it?

  • Which parameter to change to avoid "cannot allocate new log"

    Hello Everyone.
    I'm running 9i r2 on windows 2003 SD edition server with ISCSI attached. on the ISCSI drive i have 1 group of redo logs together with DBF's in the data directory. The other 2 redo groups are on the 2 separate local disks together with archive logs (in another folder).
    I'm getting a few "cannot allocate new log" errors every couple of days and in the event viewer "Archive process error: ORACLE Instance prdps - Can not allocate log, archival required"
    I'm not sure which parameter i should change.
    Current setup:
    db_writer_processes     1
    dbwr_io_slaves          0
    Here is the output from v$sysstat:
    49     DBWR checkpoint buffers written     8     7410575
    50     DBWR transaction table writes     8     7748
    51     DBWR undo block writes     8     4600265
    52     DBWR revisited being-written buffer     8     5313
    53     DBWR make free requests     8     26383
    54     DBWR free buffers found     8     19838373
    55     DBWR lru scans     8     21831
    56     DBWR summed scan depth     8     21265425
    57     DBWR buffers scanned     8     21265425
    58     DBWR checkpoints     8     1719
    59     DBWR cross instance writes     40     0
    60     DBWR fusion writes     40     0
    This is from alert.log:
    Fri Mar 06 00:25:52 2009
    ARC0: Completed archiving log 1 thread 1 sequence 7004
    Fri Mar 06 00:25:54 2009
    Thread 1 advanced to log sequence 7006
    Current log# 3 seq# 7006 mem# 0: E:\ORACLE\ORADATA\PRDPS\REDO03A.LOG
    Current log# 3 seq# 7006 mem# 1: F:\ORACLE\ORADATA\PRDPS\REDO03B.LOG
    Current log# 3 seq# 7006 mem# 2: G:\ORACLE\ORADATA\PRDPS\REDO03C.LOG
    Fri Mar 06 00:25:54 2009
    ARC1: Evaluating archive log 2 thread 1 sequence 7005
    ARC1: Beginning to archive log 2 thread 1 sequence 7005
    Creating archive destination LOG_ARCHIVE_DEST_1: 'F:\ORACLE\ORADATA\PRDPS\ARCHIVE\PRDPS_001_07005.ARC'
    Fri Mar 06 00:26:03 2009
    Thread 1 advanced to log sequence 7007
    Current log# 1 seq# 7007 mem# 0: E:\ORACLE\ORADATA\PRDPS\REDO01A.LOG
    Current log# 1 seq# 7007 mem# 1: F:\ORACLE\ORADATA\PRDPS\REDO01B.LOG
    Current log# 1 seq# 7007 mem# 2: G:\ORACLE\ORADATA\PRDPS\REDO01C.LOG
    Fri Mar 06 00:26:03 2009
    ARC0: Evaluating archive log 2 thread 1 sequence 7005
    ARC0: Unable to archive log 2 thread 1 sequence 7005
    Log actively being archived by another process
    ARC0: Evaluating archive log 3 thread 1 sequence 7006
    ARC0: Beginning to archive log 3 thread 1 sequence 7006
    Creating archive destination LOG_ARCHIVE_DEST_1: 'F:\ORACLE\ORADATA\PRDPS\ARCHIVE\PRDPS_001_07006.ARC'
    Fri Mar 06 00:26:15 2009
    ARC1: Completed archiving log 2 thread 1 sequence 7005
    ARC1: Evaluating archive log 3 thread 1 sequence 7006
    ARC1: Unable to archive log 3 thread 1 sequence 7006
    Log actively being archived by another process
    Fri Mar 06 00:26:16 2009
    Thread 1 cannot allocate new log, sequence 7008
    All online logs needed archiving
    Current log# 1 seq# 7007 mem# 0: E:\ORACLE\ORADATA\PRDPS\REDO01A.LOG
    Current log# 1 seq# 7007 mem# 1: F:\ORACLE\ORADATA\PRDPS\REDO01B.LOG
    Current log# 1 seq# 7007 mem# 2: G:\ORACLE\ORADATA\PRDPS\REDO01C.LOG
    Thread 1 advanced to log sequence 7008
    Current log# 2 seq# 7008 mem# 0: E:\ORACLE\ORADATA\PRDPS\REDO02A.LOG
    Current log# 2 seq# 7008 mem# 1: F:\ORACLE\ORADATA\PRDPS\REDO02B.LOG
    Current log# 2 seq# 7008 mem# 2: G:\ORACLE\ORADATA\PRDPS\REDO02C.LOG
    Fri Mar 06 00:26:16 2009
    ARC1: Evaluating archive log 3 thread 1 sequence 7006
    ARC1: Unable to archive log 3 thread 1 sequence 7006
    Log actively being archived by another process
    ARC1: Evaluating archive log 1 thread 1 sequence 7007
    ARC1: Beginning to archive log 1 thread 1 sequence 7007
    Should i just change
    db_writer_processes     1
    dbwr_io_slaves          2
    Thank you
    Any help appreciated.

    This message indicates that Oracle wants to reuse a redo log file, but
    the
    corresponding checkpoint associated is not terminated. In this case,
    Oracle
    must wait until the checkpoint is completely realized. This situation
    may be encountered particularly when the transactional activity is
    important.
    check for:
    - Background checkpoint started.
    - Background checkpoint completed.
    These two statistics must not be different more than once. If this is
    not true, your database hangs on checkpoints. LGWR is unable to
    continue
    writing the next transactions until the checkpoints complete.
    Three reasons may explain this difference:
    - A frequency of checkpoints which is too high.
    - A checkpoints are starting but not completing
    - A DBWR which writes too slowly.
    The way to resolve incomplete checkpoints is through tuning
    checkpoints and
    logs:
    1) Give the checkpoint process more time to cycle through the logs
    - add more redo log groups
    - increase the size of the redo logs
    2) Reduce the frequency of checkpoints
    - increase LOG_CHECKPOINT_INTERVAL
    - increase size of online redo logs
    3) Improve the efficiency of checkpoints enabling the CKPT process
    with CHECKPOINT_PROCESS=TRUE
    4) Set LOG_CHECKPOINT_TIMEOUT = 0. This disables the checkpointing
    based on
    time interval.
    5) Another means of solving this error is for DBWR to quickly write
    the dirty
    buffers on disk. The parameter linked to this task is:
    DB_BLOCK_CHECKPOINT_BATCH.
    DB_BLOCK_CHECKPOINT_BATCH specifies the number of blocks which are
    dedicated
    inside the batch size for writing checkpoints. When you want to
    accelerate
    the checkpoints, it is necessary to increase this value.

  • FAST_START_MTTR_TARGET

    Hi all,
    If lets say my log switch is happening after 20 mins.. And my value for fast_Start_mttr_target is 200... So normally checkpoint should happen at log switch that means when a log group is filled then... but 200 seconds are smaller than 20 minutes.. So will oracle perform a checkpoint every 200 seconds even if the log group is half filled lets say... So my question is in this case.. Will oracle perform a checkpoint before a log group is filled as in the above case?

    Hi girish,
    About my question, there was no relation of this question to operating system and oracle version.. I simply gave all details that fast_start_mttr_target is set to 200 and lets say log switch is happening every 20 minutes.. So i wanted just a yes or no....Its was a basic oracle arhitecture common for all versions 9i onwards... So the answer seems to me is that now dbwr will work according to this parameter by writing dirty buffers from buffer cache to datafiles and indicating this in the log buffer that these buffers wont be required for next instance recovery.
    After reading all your links, i think setting this parameter to high value means your frequency of checkpoints is low and instance recovery may take long time and if this parameter is low then this may lead to database contention for disk i/o.
    So overall answer is yes, dbwr does keeps buffer cache with datafiles, if fast_start_mttr_target is set to a lower value.
    The bottomline should be that you if you set this parameter to 200 lets say as above mentioned, then instance recovery time will not be 200 seconds, infact we are setting a limit that if beyond this value no dirty buffer should remain in database buffer cache.....

  • Redo Log Switch 결과...

    환경 : 8.1.7.3.0 (no archive log 모드)
    log_checkpoint_timeout = 0
    log_checkpoint_interval = 999999999
    redo log size = 200M
    현재 check point는 log switch 상태에서만 가능하도록 설정된 것 같습니다.
    거래량이 적어서 그런지 log switch는 30시간 주기입니다.
    제가 실행한 것은 아래 4번째 로그가 current일때
    alter system checkpoint를 하고 조금 있다가..
    alter system switch logfile를 하여 1번째가 current가 된 상황입니다.
    3/16일 14시 까지도 계속 active상태입니다...
    1. 문제가 생긴건지요??? 도움부탁합니다...
    2. no archive log mode에서도 switch 주기를 줄이는 것이 복구에 도움이 되나요...?
    ===========================================
    STATUS , FIRST_CHANGE#,FIRST_TIME
    CURRENT , 8846777646687,2007-03-15 16:57:55
    INACTIVE, 8846777587798,2007-03-14 10:34:40
    INACTIVE, 8846777609448,2007-03-14 17:17:38
    ACTIVE , 8846777643690,2007-03-15 16:01:22

    no archivemode에서 정상복구를 바라는 것인지요?
    잘못된 정책이란 생각이 듭니다.
    no archive mode에서 v$log의 first_change# 중에 가장 작은 것
    이 v$recover_file의 change# 보다 크거나 같다면 복구불능입니다.
    배치작업이라도 있어서 log switch가 한번의 cycle을 돌게 되면 이전
    백업으로는 복구불능입니다. archive mode로 지금 바로 바꾸시지요..
    log_checkpoint_timeout은 checkpoint에 대한 timeout 시간값을
    지정하는 것입니다.
    LOG_CHECKPOINT_INTERVAL specifies the frequency of checkpoints in terms of the number of redo log file blocks that can exist between an incremental checkpoint and the last block written to the redo log. This number refers to physical operating system blocks, not database blocks.
    checkpoint는 아시는 바와 같이 데이터파일과
    리두로그 컨트롤파일의 SCN을 일치시키는 것입니다. 주요한 것은
    DBWR프로세스가 데이터파일에 write를 하겠구요.
    물론 checkpoint와 인스턴스 복구는 관련이 있습니다. checkpoint timeout을
    적당히주면 instance recovery에서 좀 더 빠르게 instance 복구후 DB가
    open되겠습니다. 만약 설정하신대로 하신다면 DB를 abort로
    내리고 open하게 되면
    instance recovery시에 더 많은 시간이 필요하겠습니다.
    게다가 트랜잭션으로 인한 log switch하는 시간이 30시간보다
    작다면 timeout을 준들 영향을 주지 않겠지요. redo log가 꽉
    차게 되면 log switch를 자동으로 하게 되는데 log switch를
    하기전에 checkpoint를 주게 되어 있으니까요.
    그런데 checkpoint와 물리적/논리적 복구와는 다른 개념입니다.
    checkpoint는 위에서 말씀드린 instance recovery와 관련이 있고
    물리적/논리적 복구에서는 archive file이 떨어져 있는가 current redo log가
    존재하는가에 따라서 복구가능여부를 결정되는 것이지요..
    그리고 ACTIVE 상태라는 것은 문서상의 정의에서는 archive mode일 경우
    archiving이 되는 중일 경우, 그리고 이 상태는 complete recovery시에 redo log
    적용시 필요한 정보가 있다는 것입니다.
    no archive mode에서 복구정책을 적용 하겠다는 것은 위험한 발상인 것 같습니다.
    물론 DSS시스템의 경우에는 이미 정책을 no archive mode로
    만들어두고 주말마다 offline backup을 하기도 합니다.
    하지만 DSS에서는 하루에 300번 이상의 log switch가 일어나는
    경우가 있을 정도이니 아무리 백업이 되어 있다 한들 완전복구는
    불능이겠지요. offline backup을 했을 때까지만 복구가 됩니다.
    $LOG
    This view contains log file information from the control files.
    Column Datatype Description
    GROUP#
    NUMBER
    Log group number
    THREAD#
    NUMBER
    Log thread number
    SEQUENCE#
    NUMBER
    Log sequence number
    BYTES
    NUMBER
    Size of the log (in bytes)
    MEMBERS
    NUMBER
    Number of members in the log group
    ARCHIVED
    VARCHAR2(3)
    Archive status (YES |NO)
    STATUS
    VARCHAR2(16)
    Log status:
    UNUSED - Online redo log has never been written to. This is the state of a redo log that was just added, or just after a RESETLOGS, when it is not the current redo log.
    CURRENT - Current redo log. This implies that the redo log is active. The redo log could be open or closed.
    ACTIVE - Log is active but is not the current log. It is needed for crash recovery. It may be in use for block recovery. It might or might not be archived.
    CLEARING - Log is being re-created as an empty log after an ALTER DATABASE CLEAR LOGFILE statement. After the log is cleared, the status changes to UNUSED.
    CLEARING_CURRENT - Current log is being cleared of a closed thread. The log can stay in this status if there is some failure in the switch such as an I/O error writing the new log header.
    INACTIVE - Log is no longer needed for instance recovery. It may be in use for media recovery. It might or might not be archived.
    no archive mode에서도 복구하는 여러가지 방법들이 있기는 합니다.
    예를들어 current redo log가 깨졌을 때에 recovery 방법이라던지
    등등이 문서에 있긴하지요. 하지만 no archivemode에서 백업을 붓고
    복구하는 방법은 찾아보기 힘드실 것입니다. 위에서도 말씀드렸듯이
    no archive mode에서
    v$recover_file의 CHANGE# > v$logl의 minimum FIRST_CHANGE# 이면 데이터파일은 복구가능합니다.
    그러나 CHANGE# <= minimum FIRST_CHANGE# 이면 복구 불가능합니
    다. 그러니 백업을 붓고 복구를 하는 방법에 대한 문서는 거의
    찾기 힘듭니다. advance 방법에 대한 문서에서만 adjust_scn을 쓴다던지 하는 등이 나와있을 뿐입니다.
    글 수정:
    민천사(민연홍)
    아무래도 졸면서 썼나봅니다.;;
    interval과 timeout은 엄연히 다른데요. 왜 timeout과 interval을
    혼동했는지..;;
    LOG_CHECKPOINT_INTERVAL specifies the frequency of checkpoints in terms of the number of redo log file blocks that can exist between an incremental checkpoint and the last block written to the redo log. This number refers to physical operating system blocks, not database blocks.
    LOG_CHECKPOINT_TIMEOUT specifies (in seconds) the amount of time that has passed since the incremental checkpoint at the position where the last write to the redo log (sometimes called the tail of the log) occurred. This parameter also signifies that no buffer will remain dirty (in the cache) for more than integer seconds.

  • Checkpoint Frequency

    We are having a peculiar problem in one of our database server. The server is experiencing high log switch frequency during particular time of the day between 3 and 4 AM. 74 log switches per hour. We know for sure that there is a bunch of batch jobs that run during that time. Is there a way where we can indentify the problematic sql that generates this volume of redo?
    Regards,
    Bala

    Ok, first, solve the log switch problem. Since you normally have 3 log switches/hour, and at peak, you have 120 in a 2 hour period, that's 60 log switches/hour. So, make your logs 20x larger than they are. This way, you'll get 3 log switches/hour at peak. But, that makes the logs way too large for non-peak. So, to address that, use the archive_lag_target, to guarantee you never go more than, say 20 or 30 minutes without a log switch.
    Once you've got the logs sized properly, look at the undo issues. You'll need to determine how much undo is being generated during your peak time, and then size the undo tablespace accordingly. Finally, make sure undo_retention is set to a reasonable number.
    Hope that helps,
    -Mark

  • Checkpoint frequency when the database is open.

    Dear All,
    I am facing a lot of problem with some checkpoint parameters.
    FAST_START_IO_TARGET = value in what?
    LOG_CHECKPOINT_INTERVAL = value in no. of OS blocks
    LOG_CHECKPOINT_TIMEOUT = value in seconds
    Almost every places (Documentation and our books) it is
    mentioned that they are used only for instance recovery. Is it
    true? If so, then we don't have any way to force checkpoint to
    occur frequently when the database is running. Is there any way?
    I think the last two parameters work also when the database is
    running.
    If multiple parameters used for checkpoint will oracle use FIFO
    system or it will choose only the most aggressive parameter?
    Please see the Backup&Recovery slide 2-12. It show the case of
    instance recovery. As the most aggressive parameter
    LOG_CHECKPOINT_INTERVAL is issuing checkpoint first. Will there
    be any checkpoint at "C" or checkpoint will occur at any other
    point again set by LOG_CHECKPOINT_INTERVAL ?
    Please help me to solve this problem.
    Have a nice time,
    Tarek
    BASE Ltd, Dhaka

    There is an execellent document available on metalink explaining
    the details of the checkpoint mechanism and how to tune it.
    Document's name is "Checkpoint Tuning and Troubleshooting Guide",
    Doc Id is 147468.1.
    That document explains the parameters you ask about and
    tells you a helluva lot about checkpoints and how to get
    them to do just as you want.
    If you do not have access to Metalink, drop me a mail
    notice at [email protected], and I'll send you
    a copy via email.
    Hope that helps.
    All the best
    Michael

  • Cannot allocate new log, sequence Checkpoint not complete

    Hi,
    Im having very frequent log switches and Im getting error as
    " cannot allocate new log, sequence Checkpoint not complete"
    I was having 3 redo log groups with 50 MB each. After I found this error in the alert log; I increased teh number of redo log groups to 6 with 50MB each. Still the issue is not getting resolved.
    Please suggest what will be the best solution for this.
    Following is a snippet from alertlog.
    ==================================================
    Sun Apr 19 09:14:08 2009
    Thread 1 advanced to log sequence 5811
    Current log# 2 seq# 5811 mem# 0: /u01/app/oracle/oradata/mview/redo02.log
    Thread 1 cannot allocate new log, sequence 5812
    Checkpoint not complete
    Current log# 2 seq# 5811 mem# 0: /u01/app/oracle/oradata/mview/redo02.log
    Sun Apr 19 09:14:18 2009
    Thread 1 advanced to log sequence 5812
    Current log# 3 seq# 5812 mem# 0: /u01/app/oracle/oradata/mview/redo03.log
    Thread 1 cannot allocate new log, sequence 5813
    Checkpoint not complete
    Current log# 3 seq# 5812 mem# 0: /u01/app/oracle/oradata/mview/redo03.log
    Thread 1 advanced to log sequence 5813
    Current log# 1 seq# 5813 mem# 0: /u01/app/oracle/oradata/mview/redo01.log
    Thread 1 cannot allocate new log, sequence 5814
    Checkpoint not complete
    Current log# 1 seq# 5813 mem# 0: /u01/app/oracle/oradata/mview/redo01.log
    Sun Apr 19 09:14:32 2009
    Thread 1 advanced to log sequence 5814
    Current log# 2 seq# 5814 mem# 0: /u01/app/oracle/oradata/mview/redo02.log
    Thread 1 cannot allocate new log, sequence 5815
    Checkpoint not complete
    Current log# 2 seq# 5814 mem# 0: /u01/app/oracle/oradata/mview/redo02.log
    Thread 1 advanced to log sequence 5815
    Current log# 3 seq# 5815 mem# 0: /u01/app/oracle/oradata/mview/redo03.log
    Thread 1 cannot allocate new log, sequence 5816
    Checkpoint not complete
    Current log# 3 seq# 5815 mem# 0: /u01/app/oracle/oradata/mview/redo03.log
    Sun Apr 19 09:14:44 2009
    =========================================================
    Regards
    Pratheej

    Anand... wrote:
    Hi Sir,
    Although i too had suggested increasing the redo logfile size, but after going through [http://asktom.oracle.com/pls/asktom/f?p=100:11:0::::P11_QUESTION_ID:69012348056] i was little confused as Tom has mentioned
    Another way is to make the log files smaller, hence increasing the frequency with which we checkpoint ---- Can you explain why so.
    I was a little surprised when I read that posting - but noticed it was dated May 2000 - when databases were still quite small and less busy. (And Tom suggested 25MB as being "modest" rather than "tiny" - which is probably what many people would call 25MB these days). And May 2000 probably means 8.0 or 8.1 - and the whole log buffer, redo generation, checkpointing technology has changed a lot since then.
    Basically, if you hit "checkpoint not complete", you need more online log space so that it's possible during the busiest times to keep generating redo log information while the checkpoint queues are being cleared far enough to allow older log files to be recycled.
    You can do this by adding more log files, or by increasing the sizes of the log files you use. Tom's point, I think, was that if you chose the option to add more files and kept them small (or even made them smaller) then the volume of dirty data blocks that you could create while filling a log file would be small, so the database writer wouldn't have to do much work to make each log file available for re-use. (I'm not sure I'd agree with the approach, though - even for 8i - because it could easily lead to an increase in the volume of datablocks written, even if it did bypass the checkpoint issue).
    Regards
    Jonathan Lewis
    http://jonathanlewis.wordpress.com
    http://www.jlcomp.demon.co.uk
    "For every expert there is an equal and opposite expert."
    Arthur C. Clarke

  • Thread 1 cannot allocate new log - Checkpoint not complete caused by small

    Hello, one of my customers databases (setup by the customer) is running in archivelog mode. We find every day in the archivelog more than 10x the error "...cannot allocate new log - Checkpoint not complete "
    The system has theese parameters:
    select group#,members,bytes from v$log;
    GROUP# MEMBERS BYTES
    1 2 8388608
    2 2 8388608
    3 2 8388608
    4 2 8388608
    5 2 8388608
    6 2 8388608
    7 2 8388608
    8 2 8388608
    9 2 8388608
    10 2 8388608
    I asked the formder admin, why the redologs has only 8mb size. The answer was: "To find out, when there was big activity in the database. The count of archivelogs are bigger if you has small redologs. If you use some 250m redologs, we cannot see when tha database has big load. But this is important in case of recovery to recover the database to the point in time before the big load was has taken place." ... ???
    Okay, if the customer wants to have 8 MB redologs ... I don´t care. But how can i prevent now the error message? The only way for me is to setup more redolog groups. But it would be very confusing to have 50 or 70 groups of redologs.
    What can I do else to prevent the error?

    what is the log frequency?
    logfile size?
    can you check fast_start_mttr_target as well
    check the following description:
    Sometimes, you can see in your alert.log file, the following corresponding
    messages:
    Thread 1 advanced to log sequence 248
    Current log# 2 seq# 248 mem# 0: /prod1/oradata/logs/redologs02.log
    Thread 1 cannot allocate new log, sequence 249
    Checkpoint not complete
    This message indicates that Oracle wants to reuse a redo log file, but
    the current checkpoint position is still in that log. In this case, Oracle must
    wait until the checkpoint position passes that log. Because the
    incremental checkpoint target never lags the current log tail by more than 90%
    of the smallest log file size, this situation may be encountered if DBWR writes
    too slowly, or if a log switch happens before the log is completely full,
    or if log file sizes are too small.
    When the database waits on checkpoints,redo generation is stopped until the
    log switch is done.
    Edited by: CKPT on Jul 19, 2010 7:37 PM

  • Checkpoint not complete - BR0976W

    Recently, my SAP always got this error when I enter t-code DB14 and double click a "Database check" item :
    BR0976W Database message alert - level: WARNING, line: 1281, time: 2011-06-12 01.13.45, message : Checkpoint not complete
    I am using Oracle 9i, SAP Kernel release 640, archive log mode.
    What should I do now ?
    Add more log files ? Decrease the log switch frequency ?
    Any ideal ?

    Hello Ming,
    as Markus wrote check SAP note 79341, maybe you are affected by the problem described in section 5: "Selftune Checkpointing". This is quite common.
    The best way to prevent "checkpoint not complete" messages would be to speed up IO for the online redologs. Make sure that writing to disk is as fast as possible for your online redo logs. Most of the time slow IO causes these messages.
    Regards,
    Mark

  • Checkpoint not complete error in alert log

    version : 10.2.0.5 , 11.2.0.2
    This is what I found about "Checkpoint not complete" from google
    "+This message indicates that Oracle wants to reuse a redo log file, but the current checkpoint position is still in that log. In this case, Oracle must+
    +wait until the checkpoint position passes that log. Because the incremental checkpoint target never lags the current log tail by more than 90%+
    +of the smallest log file size, this situation may be encountered if DBWR writes too slowly, or if a log switch happens before the log is completely full,+
    +or if log file sizes are too small.+ "
    Question1.
    What do they mean by Oracle reusing a redo log file ? When one ORL is full , oracle will switch to the next one ; it won't reuse it. Right ?
    Question2.
    "the current checkpoint position is still in that log" . What is checkpoint position ?
    Question3. How often does a checkpoint occur ? (frequency as per time)

    Question1.
    What do they mean by Oracle reusing a redo log file ? When one ORL is full , oracle will switch to the next one ; it won't reuse it. Right ?You have some groups of redo log, each redo log has members with same information. Redo log run in a circular way, when a group is full, changes to the next group of redo log and when the last group is written continue overwritten the first group.
    http://docs.oracle.com/cd/B28359_01/server.111/b28310/onlineredo001.htm
    Question2.
    "the current checkpoint position is still in that log" . What is checkpoint position ?copy and paste from:
    http://docs.oracle.com/cd/E14072_01/server.112/e10713/startup.htm#BABGDACG
    "A data structure that indicates the checkpoint position, which is the SCN in the redo stream where instance recovery must begin"
    Question3. How often does a checkpoint occur ? (frequency as per time)Checkpoints occur in diferents situations, not per time, please check:
    http://docs.oracle.com/cd/E11882_01/server.112/e16508/startup.htm#CNCPT89045

  • Checkpoint not complete in DB13

    Hi all,
    I'm getting this warning message every day in the checkDB job of DB13 :
    BR0976W Database message alert - level: WARNING, line: 193239, time: 2008-02-13 13.01.39, message:
    Checkpoint not complete                                                                           
    BR0976W Database message alert - level: WARNING, line: 194490, time: 2008-02-14 00.32.58, message:
    Checkpoint not complete                                                                           
    BR0976W Database message alert - level: WARNING, line: 194509, time: 2008-02-14 00.34.10, message:
    Checkpoint not complete                                                                           
    BR0976W Database message alert - level: WARNING, line: 194630, time: 2008-02-14 01.25.17, message:
    Checkpoint not complete                                                                           
    BR0976W Database message alert - level: WARNING, line: 194655, time: 2008-02-14 01.26.37, message:
    Checkpoint not complete
    Here is the content of the alert file at line 194655
    Thu Feb 14 01:26:37 2008
    Thread 1 cannot allocate new log, sequence 104916
    Checkpoint not complete
      Current log# 13 seq# 104915 mem# 0: G:\ORACLE\PRD\ORIGLOGA\LOG_G13M1.DBF
      Current log# 13 seq# 104915 mem# 1: H:\ORACLE\PRD\MIRRLOGA\LOG_G13M2.DBF
    Can someone helps me to solve that problem ?
    Many thanks,
    Alex

    Hi
    Follow the instructions below
    1. Check at first if the problem only happens at times with an extraordinary high amount of redo logs.Check if it is possible to reduce the amount of redo log information being generated. If e.g. the "checkpoint not complete" situation only happens during online backups, you should make sure that the tablespaces are set into backup mode sequentially and not in parallel.
    2. Check if there is a temporary or permanent I/O bottleneck related to DBWR. Possible indications are high values for the wait events "write complete waits", "free buffer waits" or "db file parallel write. In addition you can perform an ORADEBUG trace of the DBWR process. In case of doubts please also contact your hardware vendor. Especially if the database seems to get stuck with "checkpoint not complete" for a longer time (> 1 minute), (temporary) I/O problems are likely.
    3. If "checkpoint not complete" occurs sporadically especially during times of high system load, you can increase the amount of redo log space or the number of DBWR processes:
    a) Increase the size of the redo log files (e.g. double size) Increasing the size of the redo log files is particularly useful if there are small time frames between the log switches (< 1 minute during peak load). The disadvantage of big redo log files is the lower checkpoint frequency and the longer time Oracle needs for an instance recovery.
    Hope this helps
    Farooq

  • "checkpoint not complete" in alert log file.

    Hi, all.
    I have got a message of "Checkpoint not complete" in alert log file.
    Thread 2 advanced to log sequence 531
    Current log# 7 seq# 531 mem# 0: \\.\REDO231
    Current log# 7 seq# 531 mem# 1: \\.\REDO232
    Thread 2 cannot allocate new log, sequence 532
    Checkpoint not complete
    Current log# 7 seq# 531 mem# 0: \\.\REDO231
    Current log# 7 seq# 531 mem# 1: \\.\REDO232
    I searched "Checkpoint not complete" issue in this forum.
    As solutions,
    1. add more redo log groups
    2. increase the size of redo log
    3. check I/O contention
    4. set LOG_CHECKPOINT_INTERVAL, LOG_CHECKPOINT_TIMEOUT or
    FAST_START_MTTR_TARGET
    I think No.4 is the possible first approach in our environment.
    I think No.1 and No2 are not the ploblems in our environment.
    I ask the above issue oracle support center, but
    I was told that "if you are not getting this message frequently, you do not need to worry about it" from an oracle engineer.
    Is this true?? If I am not getting this message frequently, there is no problem
    in terms of database integrity, consistency, and performance?
    I will be waiting for your advice and experience in real life.
    Thanks and Regards.

    Redo Log Tuning Advisory and Automatic Checkpoint Tuning are new features introduced in Oracle 10G, if you are on 10g you may benefit from these features.
    The size of the redo log files can influence performance, because the behavior of the database writer and archiver processes depend on the redo log sizes. Generally, larger redo log files provide better performance, however it must balanced out with the expected recovery time. Undersized log files increase checkpoint activity and increase CPU usage. As rule of thumb switching logs at most once every fifteen minutes.
    Checkpoint frequency is affected by several factors, including log file size and the setting of the FAST_START_MTTR_TARGET initialization parameter. If the FAST_START_MTTR_TARGET parameter is set to limit the instance recovery time, Oracle automatically tries to checkpoint as frequently as necessary. Under this condition, the size of the log files should be large enough to avoid additional checkpointing due to under sized log files.
    The redo logfile sizing advisory is specified by column optimal_logfile_size of v$instance_recovery. This feature require setting the parameter "fast_start_mttr_target" for the advisory to take effect and populate the column optimal_logfile_size.
    Also you can obtain redo sizing advice on the Redo Log Groups page of Oracle Enterprise Manager Database Control.
    To enable automatic checkpoint tuning, unset FAST_START_MTTR_TARGET or set it to a nonzero value(This is measured in seconds and by default, this feature is not enabled, because FAST_START_MTTR_TARGET has a default value of 0). If you set this parameter to zero this feature will be disabled. When you enable fast-start checkpointing, remove or disable(set to 0) the following initialization parameters:
    - LOG_CHECKPOINT_INTERVAL
    - LOG_CHECKPOINT_TIMEOUT
    - FAST_START_IO_TARGET
    Enabling fast-start checkpointing can be done statically using the initialization files or dynamically using -
    SQL> alter system set FAST_START_MTTR_TARGET=10;
    Best regards.

Maybe you are looking for

  • Opening Closing CD Tray without Apple Keyboard

    Hello, this is a simple question but I can't seem to find the answer. I switched to a Logitech G11 Keyboard for using in MSFT XP(bootcamp). I can open the tray by using the iTunes eject button. I have no way to close it except to manually push it in.

  • What are the Update tables?

    In LO Delta scenario, Data posted parallel into document tables and update tables. What are the Document tables? What are the Update tables? Give example for Application 11, which is document tables, and update tables?

  • Validate multiple signatures on one document

    I want to send out meeting minutes to be signed by 3 different people. I made a digital signed validation signature account for myself many ago -- so mine is set up. But I'm at a loss as to how to establish the account for the other two signatories.

  • Please please help! iMovie 09 won't load my project

    Hi, I've been slowly working on a project from a holiday we took early 2009 (yep, I mean slowly). I was actually getting close to having the movie finished and ready for export but now iMovie won't even show the project and this is a long project The

  • What is Face Less Component?

    Hi Friends, I just wanna to know about Face Less Components in WebDynpro ABAP. I have read the Sap Help documents but i cannot understand, What is Faceless Components and what is the Use of that. Regards, Pradeep