Frequency of query use

Hi experts,
I want to find out how many times a particular query has been accessed (in 3.1). I tried working with ST03N as well with table RSDDSTAT but didnt get a clear picture. I am still amazed how people find this mode useful to gauge the frequency of use. Probably I am not interpriting the data well.
Would preferably like to know who have used a particular query on a particular day.

zsl05,
We normally use the atatistics cubes ...
As for BW3.1 - not sure which cubes get populated...
1. Are you collecting statistics ?
2. If you are.... then there should be a cube for aggregated statistics - go through the same and it should be able to give you the info.
RSRT will give only the OLAP and DB time for the query - no. of times used will not be available.
Arun

Similar Messages

  • ABAP query using logical database KDF is not populating custom fields

    Hi Experts ,
    I created two following queries
    1.       VENDORCATKDF – uses KDF logical database
    2.       VENDORCATLFA1 – uses table = LFA1
    I’m pulling the same information in both queries:
    ·         Vendor Number
    ·         Country
    ·         Vendor Name
    ·         Vendor Category  (custom fields added to LFA1)
    The results for the query that uses the logical database KDF is incorrect.  It doesn’t pull in the flag on the custom field LFA1-ZMRO.   Even though the logical database KDF is made up of the table LFA1 and has these fields. 
    Is there something that can be done – so that all of these “custom” category fields under LFA1 (such as LFA1-ZZMRO) – get pulled into queries – when we use the logical database KDF ?

    Hi,
    I have got the error removed by ensuring that fields from one table are a part of one line ( taking help of ruler) only. But the underlying problem remains, the output is not ALV but List output.
    I do not think having additional fields in the query is reason for this.
    Is it bcoz iI am adjusting the output length of columns to ensure no hierarchical error ?
    Can we not have a query using LDB which is shown as SAP List?
    Regards,
    Garima.

  • Frequency counter unreliable using rotary vane anemometer

    I have set up an anemometer to measure air flow speed, with the signal being acquired by a 9402 module in a cDAQ-9174 chassis (4 slot). I am using Signal Express 2011 to program the instrument.
    I have set up a frequency counter task, using a maximum frequency of 1.8 kHz a minimum frequency of 250 mHz, rising edge and 1-counter (low frequency). The output is scaled using y = 0.0111x + 0. This gives 20 m/s when the frequency is 1.8 kHz.
    The readings given by Signal Express give a very noisy signal, at a frequency much higher than the bandwidth of the anemometer. The range is in the order of 20% of the mean. I have attached a PDF of the signal, for two different air flow sources, the seproj file and the tdms file for one of the runs. I have also observed that the counter output is rounded to the nearest multiple of 10, e.g. 490, 470, 480, 480, 470, etc.
    Is this consistent with a digital bounce issue? Is this consistent with an earthing issue? Is this consistent with a sample rate issue? Any other ideas for investigating this issue?
    thanks
    Attachments:
    EXPT 20 - ANEMOMETER NOISE.pdf ‏49 KB
    EXPT 20 Anemometer Noise.seproj ‏637 KB

    I have logged the voltage signal coming from the anemometer, using our 9239, a report of a few cycles is attached as a PDF. The graph clearly shows a small digital bounce. The noise is small compared to the signal, is there any way it can be filtered when acquired by the 9402?
    Other tests that I ran showed a background noise in the order of 50 microVolts and a frequency of 50 Hz, this is very likely a background noise from a power supply (we run at 50 Hz in Aus) but is many orders of magnitude smaller than the signal, I assume it would be ignoredby the 9402.
    Attachments:
    EXPT 20 Anemometer Noise Voltage.seproj ‏261 KB
    EXPT 20 Anemometer Noise Voltage.pdf ‏19 KB

  • Getting an error when i am execution a BI query using ABAP.

    Hi Expert,
    I am getting an error when i am execution a BI query using ABAP. Its Giving me this Error "The Info Provider properties for GHRGPDM12 are not the same as the system default" and in the error analysis it saying as bellow.
    Property Data Integrity has been set differently to the system default.
    Current setting: 0 for GHRGPDM12
    System default: u2019 7 u2018
    As I am very new to BI and have very limited knowledge, so I am not able to understand this problem. Can any one help me to resolving this issue. Previously it as working fine, I am getting this error last 2 days.
    when i am debugging , I am getting error from
    create instance of cl_rsr_request
    CREATE OBJECT r_request
    EXPORTING
    i_genuniid = p_genuniid.
    this FM. Its not able to create the object. Can any one please help me out.
    Thanks in advance.
    Regards
    Satrajit

    Hi,
    I am able to solve this problem
    Regards
    Satrajit

  • Error while accessing Query using Query Analyzer

    dear experts...
    while accesiing the query using query analayzer...
    we are getting below error...
    What has happened?
    URL http://xxx.xxx.xxx.xx:XXXX/irj/servlet/prt/portal/prtroot/pcd!3aportal_content!2fcom.sap.pct!2fplatform_add_ons!2fcom.sap.ip.bi!2fiViews!2fcom.sap.ip.bi.bex call was terminated because the corresponding service is not available.
    Note
    The termination occurred in system BI1 with error code 404 and for the reason Not found.
    The selected virtual host was 0 .
    What can I do?
    Please select a valid URL.
    If you do not yet have a user ID, contact your system administrator.
    ErrorCode:ICF-NF-http-c:001-u:ANAND-l:E-i:PSRCCPRDA003_BI1_00-v:0-s:404-r:Notfound
    HTTP 404 - Not found
    Your SAP Internet Communication Framework Team
    thanks for helping me...
    anand

    Hi friends,,
    instead of getting the link like
    http://128.222.125.57:9000/sap/bw/bex?cmd=ldoc&infocube=ZMC_SRH1&query=AGINGV21A&sap-language=EN(working link)
    am getting below link...which is getting an error....
    http://128.222.125.57:9000/sap/bw/://:/irj/servlet/prt/portal/prtroot/pcd!3aportal_content!2fcom.sap.pct!2fplatform_add_ons!2fcom.sap.ip.bi!2fiViews!2fcom.sap.ip.bi.bex?QUERY=AGINGV21A
    above marked is the unwanted thing so how can i change my link in query designer???
    please suggest me firneds

  • Unable to create new query using query manager

    Hi friends,
    I have been trying to create a query using query manager for couple of hours but still not able to.I am following the instructions given in oracle Peopletools 8.52 : Peoplesoft query
    Chapter - creating new queries.
    Below are the steps I am going through to create new query:
    Step - I open the component Reporting Tools-> Query->Query Manager , I don't get the tabbed pages one for search an existing query and another for create new query.
    Please follow this link to see how the page is displayed in first step:
    http://uploadpic.org/v.php?img=EvMvVAXX1E
    Step 2 - When I click on create new query link, I am redirected to a page where it asks for record name to add in the query. But, even this page is not displayed as how it supposed to be
    http://uploadpic.org/v.php?img=GzHh3f6krU
    Step 3 - Following the above step, when I click on Person record to add into my query I am asked to select the fields that I want to display in the output.
    But I somehow do not get the proper tabbed pages where individual pages are there to add the attributes to complete the query like adding multiple records, fields, query, expressions, prompt...etc
    http://uploadpic.org/v.php?img=Wbbla3Q3jE
    I am neither able to select multiple records in my query nor able to customize my query to get the desired results.
    Below is the query that I want to create using query manager:
    SELECT P.EMPLID,P.BIRTHDATE, N.NAME, A.ADDRESS1, A.ADDRESS2, A.CITY
    FROM PS_PERSON P, PS_NAMES N, PS_ADDRESSES A
    WHERE P.EMPLID = N.EMPLID AND
    N.EMPLID = A.EMPLID AND
    P.BIRTHDATE BETWEEN to_date('1990/1/1','yyyy/mm/dd') and to_date('1991/1/1','yyyy/mm/dd');

    Hi,
    As I cannot access your screenshot by the blocking of company firewall rules.
    I'm guessing currently you are using PT 8.52.00 version, correct?
    This should be a bug, that you need to apply the 8.52.0X patch, not sure which patch fix this, you can apply the latest one to solve this issue for no tab page of query manager. (PT 8.52.06)
    Hope this helps.
    Thanks,
    Saxon SI

  • In DBI , how to find out the Source Query used for the Report

    Hi All,
    How to find out the Source Query used to display the data in the DBI Reports or Dashboards. We can get it in Apps Front end by Going to Help and Record Histroty. But DBI Runs in Internet Explorer so i dont know how to get the source query ( SELECT Query ) Used.
    In IE we have View --> Source . But that does not help since it gives the HTML Coding and not the SELECT Query used.
    If anyone has ever worked on it...Please help me in finding it.
    Thanks,
    Neeraj Shrivastava

    Hi neeraj,
    You can see the query used to display reports.Follow these steps to get the query.
    1)Login to oracle apps
    2)Select "Daily Business Intelligence Administrator" responsiblity.
    3)Now click on "Enable/Disable Debugging" (Now u enabled debugging)
    4)now open the report which you want to see the query of
    5)In view source it displays query along with the bind varilables.
    Feel free to ping me if you have any doubts
    thanks
    kittu

  • How do i know if my query using  SORT_AREA_SIZE   or temporary tablespace ?

    Good Morning  Everyone !
    My DB version is 10.2.0.1
    I have large table  exactly 3 million records.
    SQL> select count(*) from tab1;
    COUNT(*)
       300000
    SQL> select * from tab1 order by no DESC;
    sorting  ... in process
    300000 rows selected.
    in Terminal 2 : I tried to find  sorting details -   ( No rows  selected - why ? )
    SQL> select USERNAME , USER , TABLESPACE , SQL_ID from v$tempseg_usage  ;
    no rows selected
    SQL> /
    no rows selected
    When i google i have seen this ;
    If  Oracle cannot do the sort in memory  (SORT_AREA_SIZE initialisation parameter), space will be allocated in a temporary tablespace for doing the sort operation.
    REF_LINK : TEMPORARY Tablespaces and TEMPFILES | Oracle FAQ
    MY DOUBT QUESTION :   How do i know if my query using  SORT_AREA_SIZE   or temporary tablespace ?
    Thanks in advance.

    @ JohnWatson
    I have seen some articles from ORA - FAQ. Good.
    SQL> select USERNAME , USER , TABLESPACE , SQL_ID from v$tempseg_usage;
    USERNAME                       USER   TABLESPACE                      SQL_ID
       SCOTT                               SYS          TEMP                            fh9vqgyd6m0d1
    PGA management means that sorting only 300000 rows  may well occur in memory
                Is this (3 million rows) -  standard  value for 10g version ?
    Thanks JohnWatson

  • How can I perform this kind of range join query using DPL?

    How can I perform this kind of range join query using DPL?
    SELECT * from t where 1<=t.a<=2 and 3<=t.b<=5
    In this pdf : http://www.oracle.com/technology/products/berkeley-db/pdf/performing%20queries%20in%20oracle%20berkeley%20db%20java%20edition.pdf,
    It shows how to perform "Two equality-conditions query on a single primary database" just like SELECT * FROM tab WHERE col1 = A AND col2 = B using entity join class, but it does not give a solution about the range join query.

    I'm sorry, I think I've misled you. I suggested that you perform two queries and then take the intersection of the results. You could do this, but the solution to your query is much simpler. I'll correct my previous message.
    Your query is very simple to implement. You should perform the first part of query to get a cursor on the index for 'a' for the "1<=t.a<=2" part. Then simply iterate over that cursor, and process the entities where the "3<=t.b<=5" expression is true. You don't need a second index (on 'b') or another cursor.
    This is called "filtering" because you're iterating through entities that you obtain from one index, and selecting some entities for processing and discarding others. The white paper you mentioned has an example of filtering in combination with the use of an index.
    An alternative is to reverse the procedure above: use the index for 'b' to get a cursor for the "3<=t.b<=5" part of the query, then iterate and filter the results based on the "1<=t.a<=2" expression.
    If you're concerned about efficiency, you can choose the index (i.e., choose which of these two alternatives to implement) based on which part of the query you believe will return the smallest number of results. The less entities read, the faster the query.
    Contrary to what I said earlier, taking the intersection of two queries that are ANDed doesn't make sense -- filtering is the better solution. However, taking the union of two queries does make sense, when the queries are ORed. Sorry for the confusion.
    --mark                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                       

  • SAP / ABAP Query - using logical database

    Hi ,
    We have a mandate to implement SAP Query using only Logical Databases (LDB ) .
    We understand that there are several issues using this approach .
    1 ) Paralled tables in MM need to be displayed on separate lines .
    2 ) Statistics based on fields from 2 different tables cannot be produced eg: EKPO ( PO Number )  and EKKN . (Cost Center )
    Please share your experiences .
    Thank you in advance .
    Kishore
    Kishore

    Adeel,
    I do appreciate your experience and respect you for knowledge on SAP Query. 
    Joining tables seem simple to IT experts but not so for end users.  SAP Query is an end-user tool and users seem to need a simple user-friend, drag-and-drop solution to extract information using SAP Query based on a pre-defined infoset.  Various SAP conferences have been advocating the use of SAP delivered Logical Databses to create infosets in order to harness the various advantages of LDBs. 
    In MM there are several LDBs (e.g. ELM, EBM etc) to create queries on EKPO and EKKN.  The problem arises when you use the same LDB to extract information from more than the above two tables e.g. EKPO, EKET, EKKN and EKBE.  SAP expects you to display fields on multiple lines and also does not allow producing statistics based on fields from two parallel tables say EKKN and EKBE.  Moreover, multi-line reports cannot be produced in the ALV/SLV format.  
    We are also looking for best practise solutions in providing SAP Query to MM or FI users based on SAP delivered Logical Databases.  
    Pascal

  • Please help to re-write this query using exists or with

    Hi please help to re-write this query using exists or with, i need to write same code for 45 day , 90 days and so on but sub query condition is same for all
    SELECT SUM (DECODE (t_one_mon_c_paid_us, 0, 0, 1)) t_two_y_m_mul_ca_
    FROM (SELECT SUM (one_mon_c_paid_us) t_one_mon_c_paid_us
    FROM (
    SELECT a.individual_id individual_id,
    CASE
    WHEN NVL
    (b.ship_dt,
    TO_DATE ('05-MAY-1955')
    ) >= SYSDATE - 45
    AND a.country_cd = 'US'
    AND b.individual_id in (
    SELECT UNIQUE c.individual_id
    FROM order c
    WHERE c.prod_cd = 'A'
    AND NVL (c.last_payment_dt,
    TO_DATE ('05-MAY-1955')
    ) >= SYSDATE - 745)
    THEN 1
    ELSE 0
    END AS one_mon_c_paid_us
    FROM items b, addr a, product d
    WHERE b.prod_id = d.prod_id
    AND d.affinity_1_cd = 'ADH'
    AND b.individual_id = a.individual_id)
    GROUP BY individual_id)
    Edited by: user4522368 on Aug 23, 2010 9:11 AM

    Please try and place \ before and after you code \Could you not remove the inline column select with the following?
    SELECT a.individual_id individual_id
         ,CASE
            when b.Ship_dt is null then
              3
            WHEN b.ship_dt >= SYSDATE - 90
              3
            WHEN b.ship_dt >= SYSDATE - 45
              2
            WHEN b.ship_dt >= SYSDATE - 30
              1
          END AS one_mon_c_paid_us
    FROM  items           b
         ,addr            a
         ,product         d
         ,order           o
    WHERE b.prod_id       = d.prod_id
    AND   d.affinity_1_cd = 'ADH'
    AND   b.individual_id = a.individual_id
    AND   b.Individual_ID = o.Individual_ID
    and   o.Prod_CD       = 'A'             
    and   NVL (o.last_payment_dt,TO_DATE ('05-MAY-1955') ) >= SYSDATE - 745
    and   a.Country_CD    = 'US'

  • Execute a query using ABAP  (XSLT transformation issue)

    Hello,
    I made the steps from this blog (part I, II and III).
    /people/durairaj.athavanraja/blog/2005/12/05/execute-bw-query-using-abap-part-iii
    When trying to run the XSLT transformation, I got the message that : XML invalid source file.
    I am not sure what are the steps for running a transformation, or running it for this case ,maybe something it's not ok. I just run it, did not provide any information.
    Any suggestions ? Did anyone use the function module described in this blog ?
    Thank you very much in advance.

    try giving
    CALL TRANSFORMATION (`ID`)
    SOURCE meta = meta_data[]
    output = <ltable>[]
    RESULT XML xml_out
    OPTIONS xml_header = 'NO'.
    and check - sometimes the codepages configured in the BW system tend to cause an issue... I am not sure if the syntax is right though - but you are basically trying to bypass any encoding that is happening in the query transformation....
    http://www.sapetabap.com/ovidentia/index.php?tg=fileman&sAction=getFile&inl=1&id=4&gr=Y&path=ABAP%2FABAPENANGLAIS&file=ABAP-XML+Mapping.pdf&idf=41
    Edited by: Arun Varadarajan on May 18, 2009 11:28 PM

  • How to use user defined function in select query using Toplink

    Hi Friends
    I am little bit of new in Toplink stuff... so please help me...
    I have to database functions 1. encrypt and 2. decrypt.
    I want to exceute the following sql query using toplink
    select port, database, user_name, decrypt(encrypt('String which is to be encrypt ','password'),'password') from CONFIGURATION
    can anyone tell me , how to write code in toplink which will give the about sql output.
    thanks .....

    The "Specifying a Custom SQL String in a DatabaseQuery" section in the TopLink Developer's Guide may help... http://download-uk.oracle.com/docs/cd/B32110_01/web.1013/b28218/qrybas.htm#BCFHDHBG

  • User constructed query using dropdowns

    Hi all,
    I am trying to create a sql query using select lists with an application page. My problem is that written as a statement it would say;
    select count (distinct id)
    from requests
    where date_raised between '01 JUN 07' and '30 JUN 07';
    but if try to have a select list passing 'date_raised' or 'date_closed' it still works but if I put another for 'between' and 'not between' it has a problem, for example;
    select count (distinct id)
    from requests
    where :P5_SL_RAISED_CLOSED :P5_SL_BETWEEN :P5_START_DATE and :P5_END_DATE
    and date_closed is null or date_closed >:P5_END_DATE;
    Could someone help me please, I searched the forums and nobody seems to have done this. (Or maybe it's so simple they just didn't post!)
    Thanks,
    Jay

    Hi Jay,
    you can accomplish this in following way:
    change your report type to SQL Query(PL/SQL function body returning SQL Query),
    then in region source try this:
    begin
    return 'select count (distinct id)
    from requests where ' || :P5_SL_RAISED_CLOSED ||' '|| :P5_SL_BETWEEN || ' to_date('''|| :P5_START_DATE ||''',''DD-MM-YYYY'') AND to_date(''' || :P5_END_DATE || ''',''DD-MM-YYYY'') and date_closed is null or date_closed > to_date('''|| :P5_END_DATE || ''',''DD-MM-YYY'')';
    end;
    Of course, you should change DD-MM-YYYY to date format used in your fields.
    Hope this helps.
    Tomasz K>

  • Modify query used in Materialized View

    Are there any ways to modify the query used in materialized view without dropping the materialized view. I dont think alter materialized view has such an option.
    Please provider me your suggestions.

    you have to give "ENABLE QUERY REWRITE" option then u can change your query

Maybe you are looking for