From clause query works ok in form designer,  gets an ORA-01422 ran on web

I am using forms 6i patch 9 with 10g database.
I have two ‘FROM clause queries’ fired via a block/key-exeqry trigger in a if/elsif.
The first/top SET BLOCK PROPERTY works perfect and populates the block.
But the bottom/second SET BLOCK PROPERTY select (after the elsif)
Is also based on a user entered field value and generates a ora-01422 error.
The problem is that both top and bottom set block properties
work fine when ran in forms designer,
But when I compile it on the app_server and run the web version
1. the top all ‘FROM clause query’ works fine
2. the bottom ‘FROM clause query’ works fine if only one record to return.
3. the bottom ‘FROM clause query’: gets the ora-01422 if > 1 record to return.
FRM-40735: KEY–EXEQRY trigger raised unhandled exception ORA-01422
The ORA-01422: ‘Exact fetch returned more than the exact number of rows’.
Both set block property selects ‘share’ a block property/where clause of FAC_ID = :FACILITIES.ID
The entered value in the entry field should populate 1 to many associated records
in the bottom (elsif) set block property (and does so correctly when ran in forms designer)
The block’s key-exeqry code:
–-query all records associated with fac_id only
if (:emission_stacks.stack_id_num is null) then
     SET_BLOCK_PROPERTY('EMISSION_STACKS',QUERY_DATA_SOURCE_NAME,
     '(SELECT C.ID, A.ID EP_ID,A.FAC_ID,A.NUM,A.DESCRIPTION,C.PARENT_MODE_ID,
C.STACK_ID, C.CAPTURE_PERCENT, C.CAPTURE_METHOD, C.DATE_TESTED
FROM EMISSION_POINTS A,
EP_MODES B,
CAPTURING_DEVICES C
WHERE A.ID = B.EP_ID AND
B.ID = C.PARENT_MODE_ID AND
C.CD_ID IS NULL AND
C.PARENT_MODE_ID IS NOT NULL AND
C.STACK_ID IS NOT NULL)');
EXECUTE_QUERY;
elsif
(:emission_stacks.stack_id_num is not null) then
–-(query all records associated with fac_id and the entry field value)
SET_BLOCK_PROPERTY('EMISSION_STACKS',QUERY_DATA_SOURCE_NAME,
     '(SELECT C.ID, A.ID EP_ID, A.FAC_ID, A.NUM, A.DESCRIPTION, C.PARENT_MODE_ID,
C.STACK_ID, C.CAPTURE_PERCENT, C.CAPTURE_METHOD, C.DATE_TESTED
FROM EMISSION_POINTS A,
EP_MODES B,
CAPTURING_DEVICES C,
STACKS S
WHERE A.ID = B.EP_ID AND
B.ID = C.PARENT_MODE_ID AND
C.STACK_ID = S.ID AND
C.CD_ID IS NULL AND
C.PARENT_MODE_ID IS NOT NULL AND
C.STACK_ID IS NOT NULL AND
S.NUM = '''||:emission_stacks.stack_id_num||''')');
EXECUTE_QUERY;
** I have multiple database items in the block.
Data block properties:
Database/
Data Base Block = Yes
Query Allowed= Yes
Is there a way to overcome the ora-01422?
And populate the block with multiple rows(records)?
Any suggestions appreciated.

Sorry, false alarm, I made a mistake
the form is working fine the way it should,
without error. (No ora-01422 errror is occurring now.)
I just got a new version of humming bird,
which I used to compile the form with
and did not have the binary switch on:
--long story short, a new fmx was not created
and I was not seeing the current version of screen
at runtime.
Thank you.

Similar Messages

  • From Clause query with form variables

    forms 9.0.4 rdbms 9.2
    Is it possible to create a From Clause query with form variables generated from another block (but in the same form)? I am not having any success.
    I searched Metalink. It appears that according to DOC ID # 69884.1, in Forms 6i, this is not possible. Metalink suggest in DOC ID 104771.1 implementating a dynamic From Clause, but when I duplicate the example on my system, I receive an Oracle error. Further investigation from the web form (DISPLAY ERROR) indicates that the system does not see the dynamic value.
    Has anyone else run into this error? Has this been fixed in forms 9.0.4 and I am just missing something? Does a dynamic from clause query work? Can anyone point me to an example or post an example or offer any advise.
    thanks in advance

    As far as I know it is not possible to use block items in a from clause query in forms 9.0.4. Here is my solution for a From-Clause-Query via the 'Query-Data-Source-Name-Property':
    To use the values of the block items in my from clause query I implemented a database package with getter and setter routines for the block item values I needed for the query.
    In the Key-Exeqry-Trigger of the From-Clause-Query-Block I set the global package variables with values of the block-items I am interested in. In the From-Clause-Query I used the values in the where-clause via package functions which return the global package variables.
    Hope my solution will work for your problem.

  • Getting from clause query to work right?

    Hello, me again :) waves
    I am at a point now in my application where I need to base a block on a join. I have played around with Forms and used some very simple queries.
    As an example, consider these this SQL:
    select users.user_name, users_info.email from users, users_info where users_info.users_id = users.users_id
    this should return a username and an email address.
    Now, when I add this to a block, set the block's type to "from clause query" and create a canvas/frame/textboxes for the output it doesn't work. I try to "enter query"/"execute query". I get an FRM-40505 error (unable to perform query). I have defined all the columns in the blocks "query data source columns" property.
    I have searched through all the Developer books we have here as well as this forum. I would like to not have to create a view in the database for every little screen I need to make :(
    Ideas?

    The Database Item names in the block should match with the column names in the query. I think we don't have to set query data source columns property. So try creating a new block without this query data source columns property and with this from clause query and see if it works or not ?
    Partha
    null

  • Form blows up when clicked in data block using a FROM clause query

    Hi,
    I have a form that has two blocks. The detail block is based on a "FROM query clause" in the 'Query Data Source Type' in the block Properties.
    I have a simple select in the 'Query Data Source Name'.
    I made sure the select is enclosed in parenthesis and the alias names in the SELECT are the same as the ITEMS defined in the block
    The data needs to be displayed in a tabular fashion.
    When I run the form, the data is displayed correctly..but when I click the mouse on any item of this block or try to scroll down, everything just blows up and it closes my form.
    I have made sure both blocks have the same properties. But, this seems to happen no matter what.
    Any help in regard is greatly appreciated.
    Thanks much,
    Vijji

    This is how I set the relationship for the detail block say BLOCK2.
    1. I first do this:
    Database Data Block = YES
    Query Allowed = YES
    Query Data Source Type = FROM clause query Query Data Source Name = ( select jio.order_header_id order_header_id, jii.item_code item_code, SUM(jii.item_qty) item_qty from joe_indv_items jii, joe_indv_orders jio where jii.indv_order_id = jio.indv_order_id group by jio.order_header_id, jii.item_code )
    The master and detail need to be tied by the order_header_id which I can get from the header block.
    2. In the WHEN-NEW_BLOCK-INSTANCE trigger for BLOCK2, I wrote the following where I dynamically pass the order_header_id:
    DECLARE
    q varchar2(1000);
    BEGIN
         q := '(SELECT jio.order_header_id order_header_id,
         jii.item_code item_code,
         SUM(jii.item_qty) item_qty
         FROM joe_indv_items jii, joe_indv_orders jio
         WHERE jio.order_header_id = ' || :HEADERS.order_header_id||'
         AND jii.indv_order_id = jio.indv_order_id
         GROUP BY jio.order_header_id, jii.item_code )';
         CLEAR_BLOCK;
    SET_BLOCK_PROPERTY('BLOCK1', QUERY_DATA_SOURCE_NAME, q);
    EXECUTE_QUERY;
    END;
    I am not sure if I should write the exact select statement in the Query Data Source Name or not.
    Please advice.
    Thanks much,
    Vijji

  • KEY-EXEQRY trigger and FROM CLAUSE QUERY problem

    Hi,
    I have a form designed in Oracle Forms6i. I have two block on it, BlockA and BlockB.
    When BlockA is queried with some data to search, I need to build the FROM CLAUSE QUERY for BlockB. It uses the same WHERE condition as I used to search BlockA.
    I am building the FROM CLAUSE QUERY and executing query for BlockB on KEY-EXEQRY trigger of BlockA.
    It works fine, if first time, I query the BlockA without any specific data. But it gives me error 'ORA-01008: not all variables bound' if I query the BlockA with specific data very first time.
    Please advise.
    Thanx
    Zaaf

    No, I am not using any substitution variables. To get the LAST_QUERY for BlockA, I am using Get_Block_Property.
    But now I switched it to :system.LAST_QUERY and it worked.
    Thank you!

  • SET_BLOCK_PROPERTY('QUERY_DATA_SOURCE_NAME') with FROM clause query data block

    Two block :
    - Block A based on table
    - Block B based on FROM clause query
    In WHEN-NEW-RECORD-INSTANCE of block A, I perform a SET_BLOCK_PROPERTY('BLOCK_B','QUERY_DATA_SOURCE_NAME','(...)'); and then query block B (... depends on value taken by 'code' column in block A).
    At runtime it works till 'code' does not change (query_data_source_name does not change) but when I navigate to a record having a different 'code', it got the folowing message :
    41380 - Cannot set the blocks query data source.
    Any idea or suggestion ?

    Hello all i m trying dynamically change query_data_source_name but its not working.
    i did the followings
    Forms(10g2) block level:Query_data_source_type
    Query_data_source_name:SELECT 1,2,3,4,5 FROM dual;
    in control Block:
    when_button_press my code is
    GO_BLOCK('blk_query');
    Clear_Block(No_Validate);
    set_block_property('blk_query',query_data_source_name,
    'SELECT col1,col2,col3,col4,col5 FROM mytable');
    execute_query;
    same result:unable to query error.
    any one can help me regarding this issue.

  • From Clause Query

    Designer Version 6.5.95.4.8
    Configuration: 4.0.12
    Release 4.10
    Database 10g
    Forms [32 Bit] Version 6.0.8.25.2 (Production)
    Can someone help me with From Clause query in Designer?
    Designer Help files do not seem to cover this in depth.
    Here is what I did so far.
    1. Created module component
    2. Set Datasource Type to Query
    3. Code to set the query at run time:
          GO_BLOCK('LINK_DTL');
          CLEAR_BLOCK(NO_VALIDATE);
          vFromClauseQuery := '(SELECT DISTINCT p_code, e_code '||
                               'FROM code_table '||
                               'WHERE L_YEAR = '||:LINK.l_year||' AND L_SEQ = '''||:LINK.l_seq||''')';
          SET_BLOCK_PROPERTY('LINK_DTL',QUERY_DATA_SOURCE_NAME,vFromClauseQuery);
          DO_QUERY;   
    Also I created unbound columns :p_code and :e_code for the block, to receive the results from the query (is that the correct way to do it?)
    When I run the form, my block is empty, and if I open the form in form builder, the block that I had set to have datasource of "query" has datasource type of "table" ???
    Thanks

    Bind variables cannot be referenced in from clause query (this is a bug/enhancement 767062).
    But, in PRE-QUERY trigger we can write built-in
    SET_BLOCK_PROPERTY (block_name, QUERY_DATA_SOURCE_NAME, value);
    For example:
    DECLARE
    l_deptno dept.deptno%TYPE := 50;
    l_from_clause VARCHAR2 (1000);
    BEGIN
    l_from_clause :=
    '(SELECT deptno, dname, loc FROM dept WHERE deptno < ' || l_deptno || ')';
    SET_BLOCK_PROPERTY (:SYSTEM.TRIGGER_BLOCK, QUERY_DATA_SOURCE_NAME, l_from_clause);
    END;
    Regards,
    Zlatko Sirotic

  • FROM Clause Query and Invisible records :(

    HI:
    My form has a block based on a FROM clause query (QUERY DATA SOURCE TYPE).
    This works fine with no errors. Count hits suggests that it is retrieving records but my Item is not displaying the records. I have nine records in total but all fields are blank even though I can 'scroll' through the nine (invisible) records.
    Strange, any ideas people ?
    thanks.
    N.

    Thanks you for the reply but its not the cause of the 'probem'. My items are in a multi record block ( I have tried single item bock / No Items displayed 1 etc..) but to no avail.
    The strange thing about it is that I can Message(:blk.item) and the value displays on the Message bar but there are no values displayed in the Canvas Item at runtime ????? Very strange or does someone know something I dont.
    I can even scroll to the end of the record set ( 9 recs).
    I have never caome across this before has anyone else ?
    Thanks
    N.

  • Using FROM clause query in block

    I have a block using a FROM clause query instead of a table. I have two items in the block that correspond to the select statement. Here's the SQL statement I've entered:
    SELECT BEZEICHNUNG, ZEIT_TYP_NR
    FROM ZEIT_TYPE
    WHERE ZEIT_TYP_NR IN
    (SELECT ZEIT_TYP_NR
    FROM PROM_ZEIT_TYP
    WHERE PROM_TYP_NR = :GLOBAL.PROM_TYP_NR)
    When I run forms, it ADDS to my SQL statement!! Here's what it does:
    SELECT BEZEICHNUNG,ZEIT_TYP_NR
    FROM (SELECT BEZEICHNUNG, ZEIT_TYP_NR FROM ZEIT_TYPE) WHERE ZEIT_TYP_NR IN
    (SELECT ZEIT_TYP_NR
    FROM PROM_ZEIT_TYP
    WHERE PROM_TYP_NR = :1)
    can anyone tell me why it's adding this first line to my select statement??

    "a from clause query" is the rather strange name forms uses for what is generally known as in an in-line view.
    Your in-line view is being treated by forms the same way as it would a table, it sticks a SELECT, a list of columns determined from the database items in the block and a FROM on the beginning. If the user specifies query criteria in enter-query mode it will quite correctly apply the where clause to the outer select rather than to the in-line view.

  • Master detail with from clause query

    Hi!
    I have 2 blocks: master and detail. The master block is based on a from clause query. Since I have to insert, update and delete on this block I have created the on-insert, on-update, on-delete and on-lock triggers (and the respective procedures).
    In this block I have on-populate-details and pre-delete triggers created by the master-detail relation.
    Now I have a problem!
    Since I only want to commit to db when I click the "ok" button and I want to insert and delete records from these 2 blocks, when I insert records into the detail block (and master too), it forces me to save changes if I change the focus of the current record of de master block to another record within the same block.
    How can I do this in order to insert records saving changes only when I click the button?
    Thanks!
    Ana

    I think that it is intended behaviour: when detail records are populated and there are uncommited changes so Forms asks if user wants to save changes.

  • FROM CLAUSE QUERY, how to construct?

    Have always used the data block wizard so am probably missing something quiet simple. I have created a new form and am manually creating a simple test block. What i've done so far:
    Block Properties
    Database Data block: No
    Enforce Primary Key: Yes
    Query allowed: Yes
    Query data source type: FROM clause query
    Query data source name: select department_id, department_name from departments
    Query data source columns: department_id (number), department_name (varchar2)
    Created a canvas with and put two items, department_id (set as Primary key) and department_name on it.
    When i run the form i get... FRM-41003 This function cannot be performed here.
    What am i doing wrong and what steps should i be taking?
    Gus
    Oracle 10g

    first of all you should set the DATABASE DATA BLOCK property to YES, not NO.
    it is a database block though not based on a TABLE, rather on a FROM CLAUSE QUERY, but it is a database block.
    another thing, when you run the form, what function you are trying to perform when you get the error: "FRM-41003 This function cannot be performed here."
    i guess you are trying to query the data. if its same, then that should be resolved once you set the DATABASE DATA BLOCK to YES.

  • Block based on "From clause query" and substitution variable

    Hi Folks,
    I have a "From clause query" block type, which is based on query that uses a substitution variable (:BLOCK.COLUMN) from previous block. When I run a query, then I obtain an error: ORA-01008: not all variables bound.
    My query looks like:
    select seq_no, prod_code, descr, curr_code,
           max(decode(sched_type_code,'ROLLOVER',amt,0)) OUTSTD_DRAW,
           max(decode(sched_type_code,'INTCHG',amt,decode(sched_type_code,'FEEREC',amt,0))) OUTSTD_INTEREST_FEE
    from
        select r.fac_no, r.prod_code, f.descr, r.prod_seq_no seq_no, r.curr_code, r.sched_type_code,sum(nvl(rep_amt,0)) amt
          from repay_scheds r,
               fac_prods f
         where r.fac_no = f.fac_no
           and r.prod_code = f.prd_code
           and r.prod_seq_no = f.seq_no
           and r.fac_no = :B2.FAC_NO
           and r.trans_ref_from is not null
           and r.status         <> 'P'
        group by r.fac_no, r.prod_code, f.descr, r.prod_seq_no, r.curr_code, r.sched_type_code 
    group by seq_no, prod_code, descr, curr_code
    having max(decode(sched_type_code,'ROLLOVER',amt,0)) >0 or max(decode(sched_type_code,'INTCHG',amt,decode(sched_type_code,'FEEREC',amt,0))) > 0Once I replace that substitution variable in query condition with some exact test number then it works fine.
    select seq_no, prod_code, descr, curr_code,
           max(decode(sched_type_code,'ROLLOVER',amt,0)) OUTSTD_DRAW,
           max(decode(sched_type_code,'INTCHG',amt,decode(sched_type_code,'FEEREC',amt,0))) OUTSTD_INTEREST_FEE
    from
        select r.fac_no, r.prod_code, f.descr, r.prod_seq_no seq_no, r.curr_code, r.sched_type_code,sum(nvl(rep_amt,0)) amt
          from repay_scheds r,
               fac_prods f
         where r.fac_no = f.fac_no
           and r.prod_code = f.prd_code
           and r.prod_seq_no = f.seq_no
           and r.fac_no = 2012500
           and r.trans_ref_from is not null
           and r.status         <> 'P'
        group by r.fac_no, r.prod_code, f.descr, r.prod_seq_no, r.curr_code, r.sched_type_code 
    group by seq_no, prod_code, descr, curr_code
    having max(decode(sched_type_code,'ROLLOVER',amt,0)) >0 or max(decode(sched_type_code,'INTCHG',amt,decode(sched_type_code,'FEEREC',amt,0))) > 0How can I use substitution variable within query for "From clause query" block type? Or any other way how to get the same result?
    Thanks for your reply.
    Tomas

    I have a solution:
    Before entering block I'm calling function, that populates my block:
    PROCEDURE POP_<<MY_BLOCK>>_BLOCK IS
      query_txt varchar2(2000);
    BEGIN
       query_txt := '(select seq_no, prod_code, descr, curr_code,
                            max(decode(sched_type_code,''ROLLOVER'',amt,0)) OUTSTD_DRAW,
                            max(decode(sched_type_code,''INTCHG'',amt,decode(sched_type_code,''FEEREC'',amt,0))) OUTSTD_INTEREST_FEE
                                                  from
                                                     select r.fac_no, r.prod_code, f.descr, r.prod_seq_no seq_no, r.curr_code, r.sched_type_code,sum(nvl(rep_amt,0)) amt
                                                       from repay_scheds r,
                                                            fac_prods f
                                                      where r.fac_no = f.fac_no
                                                        and r.prod_code = f.prd_code
                                                        and r.prod_seq_no = f.seq_no
                                                        and r.fac_no = '||:B2.FAC_NO||'
                                                        and r.trans_ref_from is not null
                                                        and r.status         <> ''P''
                                                     group by r.fac_no, r.prod_code, f.descr, r.prod_seq_no, r.curr_code, r.sched_type_code 
                                                 group by seq_no, prod_code, descr, curr_code
                                                 having max(decode(sched_type_code,''ROLLOVER'',amt,0)) >0 or max(decode(sched_type_code,''INTCHG'',amt,decode(sched_type_code,''FEEREC'',amt,0))) > 0)';
       Go_Block('<<MY_BLOCK>>' );
       Clear_Block ;
       Set_Block_Property( '<<MY_BLOCK>>', QUERY_DATA_SOURCE_NAME, query_txt) ;
       -- populate my  block --
       Execute_Query ;
    END;Thanks,
    Tomas

  • Block based on from clause query

    Hi all...
    I am using forms 10g .....
    When I wanted block based on from clause query...
    I used this query ( SELECT * FROM exit INNER JOIN enter ON exit.ent_num = enter.ent_num where enter.depart=1)...
    When I run form .....
    frm-40505 oracle error unable to perform query
    Thank you
    Edited by: osa3_12 on Dec 10, 2009 4:33 AM

    hi
    try something like this.
      1* select empno,ename from emp where empno=empno order by 1
    SQL> /
         EMPNO ENAME
          7000 Sarah
          7369 SMITH
          7499 ALLEN
          7521 WARD
          7566 JONES
          7654 MARTIN
          7698 BLAKE
          7782 CLARK
          7788 SCOTT
          7839 KING
          7844 TURNER
         EMPNO ENAME
          7876 ADAMS
          7900 JAMES
          7902 FORD
          7934 MILLER
          8898 Sheela
    16 rows selected.
      1* select empno,ename from emp where empno=7000
    SQL> /
         EMPNO ENAME
          7000 Sarah
    SQL> sarah

  • Insert in a "FROM clause query" block

    I have a block based on "FROM clause query" (querying two different tables). I want to be abble to insert in this block. I wrote the DML code to insert in both tables, but I then need to stop forms who try to insert by itself, because it fails and rollback my change. How can I do this ?

    If you have Oracle Server 8.1.6+ you can
    create a database view with these two tables
    and create a "instead of" trigger to insert
    in both tables. It will be faster to
    execute, your Forms becomes simpler and it
    is easier to manage. Example from the
    Oracle Server documentation :
    CREATE TABLE customers_sj
    ( cust NUMBER(6),
    address VARCHAR2(50),
    credit NUMBER(9,2) );
    CREATE TABLE customers_pa
    ( cust NUMBER(6),
    address VARCHAR2(50),
    credit NUMBER(9,2) );
    CREATE TYPE customer_t AS OBJECT
    ( cust NUMBER(6),
    address VARCHAR2(50),
    credit NUMBER(9,2),
    location VARCHAR2(20) );
    CREATE VIEW all_customers (cust)
    AS SELECT customer_t (cust, address, credit, 'SAN_JOSE')
    FROM customers_sj
    UNION ALL
    SELECT customer_t (cust, address, credit, 'PALO_ALTO')
    FROM customers_pa;
    CREATE TRIGGER instrig INSTEAD OF INSERT ON all_customers
    FOR EACH ROW
    BEGIN
    IF (:new.cust.location = 'SAN_JOSE') THEN
    INSERT INTO customers_sj
    VALUES (:new.cust.cust, :new.cust.address,:new.cust.credit);
    ELSE
    INSERT INTO customers_pa
    VALUES (:new.cust.cust, :new.cust.address, :new.cust.credit);
    END IF;
    END;
    null

  • FROM clause query dara block

    Hi,
    A data block which was created using FROM clause query, can be set as master block of another block? So i want to build a detail block and the master block being the 1st block, made with FROM clause query.
    Thanks

    i observed that a block created with FROM clause query cannot be a detail block, but it can be a master block. Correct?Yes, a From Clause based Block can be the master table in the Master - Detail relationship. I have successfully created a Form with this type of relationship! (I found my demo - I had it reversed).
    I tried to create a FROM clause data block as detail block (and set a relationship with a master block) but i encountered an error at the relation and i deleted it (also the automatically generated triggers).This was my experience when I attempted a demo form that had the From Clause based block as a Detail in the Master - Detail relationship. The error in the On-Populate-Details triggers was easily fixed (the query has to be wrapped in parenthesis) but when I ran the form there was no coordination between the blocks.
    but anyway, are these things written in the documentation?Not that I have ever found. It was always my understanding that if Oracle considered the data block to be a "base table block" (eg; block property Database Data Block = Yes) then all of the features of a base table block were available. The only thing I found in the documentation (Forms Help system - search on: "About creating a Master-Detail Relationship" and open the resulting document) indicated that a relationship should not be created where the detail block is based on a procedure, but it was OK if the master block was based on a procedure (see the Limitations section of the aforementioned document). I guess you could infer that this limitation applies to From Clause based blocks as well, but this is not explicitly stated in this document.
    Craig...

Maybe you are looking for

  • Can't activate iCloud for iWorks on iPad 1

    I've trouble to get the usage of iCloud activated within the iWorks Suite on my iPad 1. In comparison to other devices (e.g. the iPad of a coworker) I'm missing the Documents & Data section within the iCloud settings on the iPad. Settings of Keynote,

  • Acrobat 8 standard problem

    have been trying to convert some word docs to pdf t he program starts to convert the gives error message that con vertion has failed correct the error and try again (have no idea what the error is) i have successfully used this pr ogram before so wha

  • How to specify character style to anchored objects markers depending on the objects formats?

    I have a long document contains much of anchored text frames with custom positions and want to delete them by aplying character styles to their markers.

  • Soap to rfc scenario error

    Hi PI Experts,       For the first time i was doing soap to rfc scenario. I have created all the objects in the ID and in the IR and also created a web service from ID an then i have saved the wsdl in my system. I have uploaded the wsdl in altova xml

  • Production Release of 9.2.0.4.0 Beta

    Is there currently any agreed date as to when ODP.NET 9.2.0.4.0 will be released as a production version? Since we are having significant problems with the following bug, Memory leak in OracleConnection using OS authentication.. [Bug #2975476], we ar