Gathering Statistics on NON-PARTITIONED objects

Hi,
Is it possible to manually gather stats only for Non-Partitioned objects without touching any of the Partitioned objects?
Oracle Version: 11.1.0.7
Thanks,
Ishan

@Hoek and Kuljeet:
I am sorry on missing out on this info.
What I mean is that, I don't want to hard-code the NON-PARTITIONED table names or take names from USER_TABLES. Oracle should pick it up automatically like the way it does it for PARTITIONED tables.
Thanks,
Ishan
Edited by: Ishan on Jun 7, 2012 6:01 PM

Similar Messages

  • Relation between computing and gathering statistics

    Hi gurus,
    What is the relation between computing and gathering statistics for a database object.Are they mutually dependent or one doesn't have anything to do with the other?How they affect performance of a database??
    plz dont redirect..just bottom lines are expected(be specific)
    Thanks in advance
    anirban

    computing term used to collect 100% statistics along with analyze command.
    gather stats is a new package provided by the oracle, also recommend to use this instead of analyze. You can also take 100% stats, like compute with analyze command, in gather stats pacakge, parameter estimate_percent=>null.
    exec dbms_stats.gather_table_stats('SCHEMA',TABLE',cascade=>true,estimate_percent=>NULL);
    Jaffar

  • Gathering statistics on partitioned and non-partitioned tables

    Hi all,
    My DB is 11.1
    I find that gathering statistics on partitioned tables are really slow.
    TABLE_NAME                       NUM_ROWS     BLOCKS SAMPLE_SIZE LAST_ANALYZED PARTITIONED COMPRESSION
    O_FCT_BP1                        112123170     843140    11212317 8/30/2011 3:5            NO                    DISABLED
    LEON_123456                      112096060     521984    11209606 8/30/2011 4:2           NO                   ENABLED
    O_FCT                           115170000     486556      115170 8/29/2011 6:3            YES        
    SQL> SELECT COUNT(*)  FROM user_tab_subpartitions
      2  WHERE table_name =O_FCT'
      3  ;
      COUNT(*)
           112I used the following script:
    BEGIN
      DBMS_STATS.GATHER_TABLE_STATS(ownname          => user,
                                    tabname          => O_FCT',
                                    method_opt       => 'for all columns size auto',
                                    degree           => 4,
                                    estimate_percent =>10,
                                    granularity      => 'ALL',
                                    cascade          => false);
    END;
    /It costs 2 mins for the first two tables to gather the statistics respectively, but more than 10 mins for the partitioned table.
    The time of collecting statistics accounts for a large part of total batch time.
    And most jobs of the batch are full load in which case all partitions and subpartitions will be affected and we can't just gather specified partitions.
    Does anyone have some experiences on this subject? Thank you very much.
    Best regards,
    Leon
    Edited by: user12064076 on Aug 30, 2011 1:45 AM

    Hi Leon
    Why don't you gather stats at partition level? If your partitions data is not going to change after a day (date range partition for ex), you can simply do at partition level
    GRANULARITY=>'PARTITION' for partition level and
    GRANULARITY=>'SUBPARTITION' for subpartition level
    You are gathering global stats every time which you may not require.
    Edited by: user12035575 on 30-Aug-2011 01:50

  • How important is gathering statistics on SYS objects?

    Hi,
    How important is gathering statistics on Data dictionary tables and other X$ tables in SYS schema. Is it bad to keep the statistics. Recently our Sr.DBA has deleted all the SYS schema stats telling that it will inversely affect the DB performance. Is it true?
    Regards
    Satish

    Hi Satish,
    *10g:*
    A new DBA task in Oracle Database 10g is to generate statistics on data dictionary objects which are contained in the SYS schema. The stored procedures dbms_stats.gather_database_stats and dbms_stats.gather_schema_stats can be used to gather the SYS schema stats. Here is an example of using dbms_stats.gather_schema_stats to gather data dictionary statistics:
    EXEC dbms_stats.gather_schema_stats(’SYS’);
    *9i*
    While it is supported in 9.2 to gather statistics on the data dictionary and fixed views, doing so isn't the norm.
    There is a bug fixed only in 10gR2 (not expected to be back-ported to 9.2) that caused this error. The fix is – don’t generate statistics against SYS – especially not the Fixed tables.
    For this query, let's see if we can get a better plan by removing statistics or by getting better statistics, or if we need to do something else to tune it. Take the SYS statistics as before, but with gather_fixed => false.
    I would like for you to test first by deleting the statistics on these two X$ tables and see how the query runs (elapsed time, plan).
    delete_table_stats('SYS','X$KQLFXPL');
    delete_table_stats('SYS','X$KGLOB');
    Then you can take statistics on them using gather_table_stats and check again (elapsed time, plan).
    gather_table_stats('SYS','X$KQLFXPL');
    gather_table_stats('SYS','X$KGLOB');
    The issue with this is that the contents of these fixed views, particularly x$kqlfxpl, can change dramatically. Gathering fixed object statistics may help now and cause problems later as the contents change.
    Warning, this is a bit dangerous due to latch contention, see the following note. I've supported a couple of very busy systems that were completely halted for a time due to latch contention on x$kglob due to monitoring queries (particularly on v$open_cursors).
    Note.4339128.8 Ext/Pub Bug 4339128 - Heavy latch contention from queries against library cache views.
    Hope this answers your question . . .
    Donald K. Burleson
    Oracle Press author
    Author of "Oracle Tuning: The Definitive Reference":
    http://www.dba-oracle.com/bp/s_oracle_tuning_book.htm

  • Oracle 11.2 - Perform parallel DML on a non partitioned table with LOB column

    Hi,
    Since I wanted to demonstrate new Oracle 12c enhancements on SecureFiles, I tried to use PDML statements on a non partitioned table with LOB column, in both Oracle 11g and Oracle 12c releases. The Oracle 11.2 SecureFiles and Large Objects Developer's Guide of January 2013 clearly says:
    Parallel execution of the following DML operations on tables with LOB columns is supported. These operations run in parallel execution mode only when performed on a partitioned table. DML statements on non-partitioned tables with LOB columns continue to execute in serial execution mode.
    INSERT AS SELECT
    CREATE TABLE AS SELECT
    DELETE
    UPDATE
    MERGE (conditional UPDATE and INSERT)
    Multi-table INSERT
    So I created and populated a simple table with a BLOB column:
    SQL> CREATE TABLE T1 (A BLOB);
    Table created.
    Then, I tried to see the execution plan of a parallel DELETE:
    SQL> EXPLAIN PLAN FOR
      2  delete /*+parallel (t1,8) */ from t1;
    Explained.
    SQL> select * from table(dbms_xplan.display);
    PLAN_TABLE_OUTPUT
    Plan hash value: 3718066193
    | Id  | Operation             | Name     | Rows  | Cost (%CPU)| Time     |    TQ  |IN-OUT| PQ Distrib |
    |   0 | DELETE STATEMENT      |          |  2048 |     2   (0)| 00:00:01 |        |      |            |
    |   1 |  DELETE               | T1       |       |            |          |        |      |            |
    |   2 |   PX COORDINATOR      |          |       |            |          |        |      |            |
    |   3 |    PX SEND QC (RANDOM)| :TQ10000 |  2048 |     2   (0)| 00:00:01 |  Q1,00 | P->S | QC (RAND)  |
    |   4 |     PX BLOCK ITERATOR |          |  2048 |     2   (0)| 00:00:01 |  Q1,00 | PCWC |            |
    |   5 |      TABLE ACCESS FULL| T1       |  2048 |     2   (0)| 00:00:01 |  Q1,00 | PCWP |            |
    PLAN_TABLE_OUTPUT
    Note
       - dynamic sampling used for this statement (level=2)
    And I finished by executing the statement.
    SQL> commit;
    Commit complete.
    SQL> alter session enable parallel dml;
    Session altered.
    SQL> delete /*+parallel (t1,8) */ from t1;
    2048 rows deleted.
    As we can see, the statement has been run as parallel:
    SQL> select * from v$pq_sesstat;
    STATISTIC                      LAST_QUERY SESSION_TOTAL
    Queries Parallelized                    1             1
    DML Parallelized                        0             0
    DDL Parallelized                        0             0
    DFO Trees                               1             1
    Server Threads                          5             0
    Allocation Height                       5             0
    Allocation Width                        1             0
    Local Msgs Sent                        55            55
    Distr Msgs Sent                         0             0
    Local Msgs Recv'd                      55            55
    Distr Msgs Recv'd                       0             0
    11 rows selected.
    Is it normal ? It is not supposed to be supported on Oracle 11g with non-partitioned table containing LOB column....
    Thank you for your help.
    Michael

    Yes I did it. I tried with force parallel dml, and that is the results on my 12c DB, with the non partitionned and SecureFiles LOB column.
    SQL> explain plan for delete from t1;
    Explained.
    | Id  | Operation             | Name     | Rows  | Cost (%CPU)| Time     |    TQ  |IN-OUT| PQ Distrib |
    |   0 | DELETE STATEMENT      |          |     4 |     2   (0)| 00:00:01 |        |      |            |
    |   1 |  DELETE               | T1       |       |            |          |        |      |            |
    |   2 |   PX COORDINATOR      |          |       |            |          |        |      |            |
    |   3 |    PX SEND QC (RANDOM)| :TQ10000 |     4 |     2   (0)| 00:00:01 |  Q1,00 | P->S | QC (RAND)  |
    |   4 |     PX BLOCK ITERATOR |          |     4 |     2   (0)| 00:00:01 |  Q1,00 | PCWC |            |
    |   5 |      TABLE ACCESS FULL| T1       |     4 |     2   (0)| 00:00:01 |  Q1,00 | PCWP |            |
    The DELETE is not performed in Parallel.
    I tried with another statement :
    SQL> explain plan for
    2        insert into t1 select * from t1;
    Here are the results:
    11g
    | Id  | Operation                | Name     | Rows  | Bytes | Cost (%CPU)| Time     |    TQ  |IN-OUT| PQ Distrib |
    |   0 | INSERT STATEMENT         |          |     4 |  8008 |     2   (0)| 00:00:01 |        |      |            |
    |   1 |  LOAD TABLE CONVENTIONAL | T1       |       |       |            |          |        |      |            |
    |   2 |   PX COORDINATOR         |          |       |       |            |          |        |      |            |
    |   3 |    PX SEND QC (RANDOM)   | :TQ10000 |     4 |  8008 |     2   (0)| 00:00:01 |  Q1,00 | P->S | QC (RAND)  |
    |   4 |     PX BLOCK ITERATOR    |          |     4 |  8008 |     2   (0)| 00:00:01 |  Q1,00 | PCWC |            |
    |   5 |      TABLE ACCESS FULL   | T1       |     4 |  8008 |     2   (0)| 00:00:01 |  Q1,00 | PCWP |            |
    12c
    | Id  | Operation                          | Name     | Rows  | Bytes | Cost (%CPU)| Time     |    TQ  |IN-OUT| PQ Distrib |
    |   0 | INSERT STATEMENT                   |          |     4 |  8008 |     2   (0)| 00:00:01 |        |      |            |
    |   1 |  PX COORDINATOR                    |          |       |       |            |          |        |      |            |
    |   2 |   PX SEND QC (RANDOM)              | :TQ10000 |     4 |  8008 |     2   (0)| 00:00:01 |  Q1,00 | P->S | QC (RAND)  |
    |   3 |    LOAD AS SELECT                  | T1       |       |       |            |          |  Q1,00 | PCWP |            |
    |   4 |     OPTIMIZER STATISTICS GATHERING |          |     4 |  8008 |     2   (0)| 00:00:01 |  Q1,00 | PCWP |            |
    |   5 |      PX BLOCK ITERATOR             |          |     4 |  8008 |     2   (0)| 00:00:01 |  Q1,00 | PCWC |            |
    It seems that the DELETE statement has problems but not the INSERT AS SELECT !

  • Best practices for gathering statistics in 10g

    I would like to get some opinions on what is considered best practice for gathering statistics in 10g. I know that 10g has auto statistics gathering, but that doesn't seem to be very effective as I see some table stats are way out of date.
    I have recommended that we have at least a weekly job that generates stats for our schema using DBMS_STATS (DBMS_STATS.gather_schema_stats). Is this the right approach to generate object stats for a schema and keep it up to date? Are index stats included in that using CASCADE?
    Is it also necessary to gather system stats? I welcome any thoughts anyone might have. Thanks.

    Hi,
    Is this the right approach to generate object stats for a schema and keep it up to date? The choices of executions plans made by the CBO are only as good as the statistics available to it. The old-fashioned analyze table and dbms_utility methods for generating CBO statistics are obsolete and somewhat dangerous to SQL performance. As we may know, the CBO uses object statistics to choose the best execution plan for all SQL statements.
    I spoke with Andrew Holsworth of Oracle Corp SQL Tuning group, and he says that Oracle recommends taking a single, deep sample and keep it, only re-analyzing when there is a chance that would make a difference in execution plans (not the default 20% re-analyze threshold).
    I have my detailed notes here:
    http://www.dba-oracle.com/art_otn_cbo.htm
    As to system stats, oh yes!
    By measuring the relative costs of sequential vs. scattered I/O, the CBO can make better decisons. Here are the data items collected by dbms_stats.gather_system_stats:
    No Workload (NW) stats:
    CPUSPEEDNW - CPU speed
    IOSEEKTIM - The I/O seek time in milliseconds
    IOTFRSPEED - I/O transfer speed in milliseconds
    I have my notes here:
    http://www.dba-oracle.com/t_dbms_stats_gather_system_stats.htm
    Hope this helps. . . .
    Don Burleson
    Oracle Press author
    Author of “Oracle Tuning: The Definitive Reference”
    http://www.dba-oracle.com/bp/s_oracle_tuning_book.htm

  • Partition an Non Partition Table in 11.2.0.1

    Hi Friends,
    I am using Oracle 11.2.0.1 Oracle Database.
    I have a table with 10 Million records and it's a Non Partitioned Table.
    1) I would like to partition the table (with partition by range ) without creating new table . I should do it in the existing table itself (not sure DBMS_REDEFINITION is the only option ) (or) can i use alter table ...?
    2) Add one partition which will have data for the unspecified range.
    Please let me know the inputs on the above
    Regards,
    DB

    Hi,
    what is the advantage of using DBMS_REDEFINITION over normal method (create partition table,grant access,insert records)You can't just add a partition in a non-partitioned table. You need to recreate existing table to have it partitioned (you can't just start adding new partitions to existing non-partitioned table). Advantage of dbms_redefinition is that it is online operation to re-create an existing table and and your data always remains available during table recreation
    I would like to know how to copy the object privileges,constraints,indexes from Non Partitioned table (sales) to Partitioned table (sales_part) which i am creating. will >DBMS_REDEFINITION.COPY_TABLE_DEPENDENTS help on this?First you need to tell us what method you are using to partition an existing table? If you are using dbms_redifiniiton, you really don't need to worry about triggers, indexex or constraints at all. Just follow any document which explains how to use dbms_redifinition. Dr. Tim has done a lot of work for dummys like us by writing documents for us. Follow this document.
    http://www.oracle-base.com/articles/misc/partitioning-an-existing-table.php
    If so can i use DBMS_REDEFINITION.COPY_TABLE_DEPENDENTS alone for copying the table dependents alone after i create partition table (or) it should be used along with >DBMS_REDEFINITION.START_REDEF_TABLE only?See above document which i mentioned.
    Salman

  • Gathering Statistics in 10.7 NCA with 8i Database

    In preparation for the 11i upgrade we are first migrating our database to 8i
    (strongly recommended Category 1 pre-upgrade step 5).
    I have contacted Oracle Support on whether it is recommended to gather
    statistics in a 10.7 NCA environment (optimizer_mode remains RULE). Oracle
    Support says NOT to gather statistics in a 10.7 environment.
    This is contradictory information to several documents I have found.
    Furthermore, Oracle has provided ADXANLYZ.sql and FND_STATS for the 10.7
    environment.
    The following sources recommend gathering statistics in a 10.7 environment:
    1) 10.7 Installation Manual (A47542-1) page A-16
    2) 11i Upgrade Manual (A69411-01) page 2-5
    3) Metalink note 1065584.6
    Can somebody please clarify? Your feedback is much appreciated.
    Thank you,
    Rich
    null

    <BLOCKQUOTE><font size="1" face="Verdana, Arial">quote:</font><HR>Originally posted by Rich Cisneros:
    We will be running 10.7 NCA in a server partitioned mode for 6-8 month using 7.3.4.4 with 8.1.6.2.
    Should I gather statistics as part of the 8i database upgrade (still 10.7) or part of the 11i Application upgrade?<HR></BLOCKQUOTE>
    Rich,
    Gather Statistics is only relevant to databases running with optimiser mode = COST or CHOOSE. Apps 10.7 runs with optimiser mode = RULE so you don't need to gather statistics until you start your actual upgrade to 11i, which will run with CBO.
    Hope this makes it clear.
    Steve

  • Implications of not gathering statistics

    Hi,
    I have a scenario that is provoking vigorous debate in my workplace and may do so here.
    We have a table with about 70 million rows in it. It grows at the rate of about 3-4 million rows a month, the rows being loaded daily rather than in one lot at the end of the month. Gathering statistics takes about 6 hours and takes a significant part of our 9 hour window for completion of various batch jobs, including loading the new rows.
    The new rows do have quite different values in certain columns (some indexed) to the existing data. However, as these rows are processed over the course of a week they will come to look just like the existing rows.
    The action that we're considering is to stop gathering statistics after every large data load and instead to do this every few months instead on the basis that the new data should not skew the balance of the existing data significantly. However, this has divided opinions.
    The database is running on Oracle 10g R2.
    Any thoughts?
    Russell.

    Oracle's default collection may or may not be the best for you given the size.
    For a table this large you should have the partitioning option. If you do then you should write your own stats collection to only look at active partitions and, if possible, set archival data partition's tablespaces to READ ONLY.
    Then with respect to collection ... do some research on what estimate percentage gives you stats good enough to support a good plan. In 10gR2 this may be a very high number. With 11g and above the default collection seems sufficiently improved you can trust it.
    SB advises "let Oracle be Oracle" and I agree. Right up until doing that hurts performance and interferes with the primary purpose of the database: Supporting your organization and its customers.

  • Move data from Non Partitioned Table to Partitioned Table

    Hi Friends,
    I am using Oracle 11.2.0.1 DB
    Please let me know how can i copy /move the data from Non -Partitioned Oracle table to the currently created Partiotioned table.
    Regards,
    DB

    839396 wrote:
    Hi All,
    Created Partitioned table but unable to copy the data from Non Partitioned table:
    SQL> select * from sales;
    SNO YEAR NAME
    1 01-JAN-11 jan2011
    1 01-FEB-11 feb2011
    1 01-JAN-12 jan2012
    1 01-FEB-12 feb2012
    1 01-JAN-13 jan2013
    1 01-FEB-13 feb2013into which partition should row immediately above ("01-FEB-13") be deposited?
    [oracle@localhost ~]$ oerr  ora 14400
    14400, 00000, "inserted partition key does not map to any partition"
    // *Cause:  An attempt was made to insert a record into, a Range or Composite
    //          Range object, with a concatenated partition key that is beyond
    //          the concatenated partition bound list of the last partition -OR-
    //          An attempt was made to insert a record into a List object with
    //          a partition key that did not match the literal values specified
    //          for any of the partitions.
    // *Action: Do not insert the key. Or, add a partition capable of accepting
    //          the key, Or add values matching the key to a partition specification>
    6 rows selected.
    >
    SQL>
    SQL> create table sales_part(sno number(3),year date,name varchar2(10))
    2 partition by range(year)
    3 (
    4 partition p11 values less than (TO_DATE('01/JAN/2012','DD/MON/YYYY')),
    5 partition p12 values less than (TO_DATE('01/JAN/2013','DD/MON/YYYY'))
    6 );
    Table created.
    SQL> SELECT table_name,partition_name, num_rows FROM user_tab_partitions;
    TABLE_NAME PARTITION_NAME NUM_ROWS
    SALES_PART P11
    SALES_PART P12
    UNPAR_TABLE UNPAR_TABLE_12 776000
    UNPAR_TABLE UNPAR_TABLE_15 5000
    UNPAR_TABLE UNPAR_TABLE_MX 220000
    SQL>
    SQL> insert into sales_part select * from sales;
    insert into sales_part select * from sales
    ERROR at line 1:
    ORA-14400: inserted partition key does not map to any partition
    Regards,
    DB

  • Exporting a PDF so that non-printing objects show but don't print?

    I've just spent a couple hours trying to find an answer to this in the forums, but can't. (The most frustrating was one thread where the original poster said, "I found the answer here," and gave a link that went right back to the main page of the forum. Argh.)
    Okay, anyway ... what I need to do?
    I've got a document with graphics that I want to show up on the pdf when I export it, but that--if a reader prints it--don't print.
    The document looks like a 3-ring binder with "tabs" for each section--just like the real thing. But the rings and tabs go right up to the edge and look terrible when printed, and whose printer can print right at the edge of the paper, anyway? But the tabs work as navigational links while looking a the pdf, and the rings just make it look cool, so I WANT them in the pdf.
    I've tried:
    Turning the entire layer into a non-printing layer (one that "shows" but does not "print"). But when I export it to a pdf, it doesn't show up on the pdf to look at OR to print. So that doesn't work.
    Using the Attribute option to turn each object into a non-printing object, but so far as I can tell, that doesn't do a thing, because they still print from the pdf.
    Exporting with the "create pdf layers" turned on and off. Exporting with the "include non-printing items" turned on and off.
    Basically, I've pretty much tried everything. I gather, from browsing the forums, that this is POSSIBLE, but can't for the life of me figure out what to do to make it happen. (Short of hiding the tabs' layer and creating an entirely separate PDF and calling it "Print version" which is not exactly what I want to do!)
    Is there maybe some magical combination of ons and offs I need to select to make this whole thing work?
    (And, seriously, am I the only person who thinks the supporting documentation is just dreadful? I can't find anything in any of the Help screens that even mentions this, much less explains how to do it.)
    Any help is appreciated!!
    --Deb

    Partial progress...
    The button option (and, I'm using CS3, by the way--I should have said that originally) does work in terms of showing on the pdf but not printing.
    The problem is that it messes up the way the document looks.
    I said it's designed to look like a 3-ring binder with tab-dividers between each section, and each tab has a hyperlink to take you to that section.
    Now, when you've got a paper binder in front of you, the tabs stay in the same sequence, and often overlap a bit (which mine do). The problem I'm having, having turned all of them into buttons, is that when you click on any of them, it "jumps" to the front of the row, so that they don't "flow" in the correct sequence.
    Am I explaining this well? You know, the top-most tab is at the top of the pile, the next one is always below it and above the third one, and so on ... you never see the second tab on TOP of the first one. I'm trying to get the document to act as close to a hard-copy binder as I can, and it did ... except the buttons keep jostling each other for attention...
    I'm going to go play around with this some more now, but ... any suggestions? (Other than restructuring my tabs so that they don't overlap at all?)

  • How to find out the Non Partitioned Tables used 2Gb on oracle

    Hi team
    how to find out the Non Partitioned Tables used > 2Gb on oracle where not is sys & system
    regards

    heres 1 I made earlier
    set pagesize 999
    set linesize 132
    col owner format a25
    col segment_name format a60
    select owner,segment_name,segment_type,(bytes/1024/1024)"MB size"
    from dba_segments
    where owner not in ('SYS','SYSTEM','XDB','MDSYS','SYSMAN') -- edit for taste
    and segment_type = 'TABLE'
    having (bytes/1024/1024) > 2000
    group by bytes, segment_Type, segment_name, owner
    order by 4 asc

  • Non-Partitioned Global Index on Range-Partitioned Table.

    Hi All,
    Is it possible to create Non-Partitioned Global Index on Range-Partitioned Table?
    We have 4 indexes on CS_BILLING range-partitioned table, in which one is CBS_CLIENT_CODE(*local partitioned index*) and others are unknown types of index to me??
    Means other 3 indexes are what type indexes ...either non-partitioned global index OR non-partitioned normal index??
    Also if we create index as :(create index i_name on t_name(c_name)) By default it will create Global index. Please correct me......
    Please help me in identifying other 3 indexes types by referring below ouputs!!!
    select INDEX_NAME,TABLE_NAME,PARTITIONING_TYPE,LOCALITY from dba_part_indexes where TABLE_NAME='CS_BILLING';
    INDEX_NAME TABLE_NAME PARTITI LOCALI
    CSB_CLIENT_CODE CS_BILLING RANGE LOCAL
    select index_name,index_type,table_name,table_type,PARTITIONED from dba_indexes where table_name='CS_BILLING';
    INDEX_NAME INDEX_TYPE TABLE_NAME TABLE_TYPE PAR
    CSB_CREATE_DATE NORMAL CS_BILLING TABLE NO
    CSB_SUBMIT_ORDER NORMAL CS_BILLING TABLE NO
    CSB_CLIENT_CODE NORMAL CS_BILLING TABLE YES
    CSB_ORDER_NBR NORMAL CS_BILLING TABLE NO
    select INDEX_OWNER,INDEX_NAME,TABLE_NAME,COLUMN_NAME from dba_ind_columns where TABLE_NAME='CS_BILLING';
    INDEX_OWNER INDEX_NAME TABLE_NAME COLUMN_NAME
    RPADMIN CSB_CREATE_DATE CS_BILLING CREATE_DATE
    RPADMIN CSB_SUBMIT_ORDER CS_BILLING SUBMIT_TO_INVOICE
    RPADMIN CSB_SUBMIT_ORDER CS_BILLING ORDER_NBR
    RPADMIN CSB_CLIENT_CODE CS_BILLING CLIENT_CODE
    RPADMIN CSB_ORDER_NBR CS_BILLING ORDER_NBR
    select dip.index_name, dpi.locality, dip.partition_name, dip.status
    from dba_part_indexes dpi, dba_ind_partitions dip
    where dpi.table_name ='CS_BILLING'
    and dpi.index_name = dip.index_name;
    INDEX_NAME LOCALI PARTITION_NAME STATUS
    CSB_CLIENT_CODE LOCAL CSB_2006_4Q USABLE
    CSB_CLIENT_CODE LOCAL CSB_2006_3Q USABLE
    CSB_CLIENT_CODE LOCAL CSB_2007_1Q USABLE
    CSB_CLIENT_CODE LOCAL CSB_2007_2Q USABLE
    CSB_CLIENT_CODE LOCAL CSB_2007_3Q USABLE
    CSB_CLIENT_CODE LOCAL CSB_2007_4Q USABLE
    CSB_CLIENT_CODE LOCAL CSB_2008_1Q USABLE
    CSB_CLIENT_CODE LOCAL CSB_2008_2Q USABLE
    CSB_CLIENT_CODE LOCAL CSB_2008_3Q USABLE
    CSB_CLIENT_CODE LOCAL CSB_2008_4Q USABLE
    CSB_CLIENT_CODE LOCAL CSB_2009_1Q USABLE
    CSB_CLIENT_CODE LOCAL CSB_2009_2Q USABLE
    CSB_CLIENT_CODE LOCAL CSB_2009_3Q USABLE
    CSB_CLIENT_CODE LOCAL CSB_2009_4Q USABLE
    select * from dba_part_indexes
    where table_name ='CS_BILLING'
    and locality = 'GLOBAL';
    no rows selected
    -Yasser
    Edited by: YasserRACDBA on Mar 5, 2009 11:45 PM

    Yaseer,
    Is it possible to create Non-Partitioned and Global Index on Range-Partitioned Table?
    Yes
    We have 4 indexes on CS_BILLING range-partitioned table, in which one is CBS_CLIENT_CODE(*local partitioned index*) and others are unknown types of index to me??
    Means other 3 indexes are what type indexes ...either non-partitioned global index OR non-partitioned normal index??
    You got local index and 3 non-partitioned "NORMAL" b-tree tyep indexes
    Also if we create index as :(create index i_name on t_name(c_name)) By default it will create Global index. Please correct me......
    Above staement will create non-partitioned index
    Here is an example of creating global partitioned indexes
    CREATE INDEX month_ix ON sales(sales_month)
       GLOBAL PARTITION BY RANGE(sales_month)
          (PARTITION pm1_ix VALUES LESS THAN (2)
           PARTITION pm2_ix VALUES LESS THAN (3)
           PARTITION pm3_ix VALUES LESS THAN (4)
            PARTITION pm12_ix VALUES LESS THAN (MAXVALUE));Regards

  • Preflight Report lists Non-Opaque Object in InD CS3?

    In the preflight report there is mention of Non-Opaque objects. Why is this bad, how can I recognize that this is an issue and how do I fix the problem. I researched a bit and found suggestions to make separate layers for the text/lines and images with the text and lines above the image. Then when the page is flattened in the PDF process, the resolution should be better. I still do not know how to recognize that there would be an issue. Please help.

    Best practice is to keep the transparency live for as long as possible, ideally flattening in the RIP at output, but there are still a lot of printers whose equipment is outdated (or their thinking), and for them it will be necessary to provide a flattened PDF for printing.
    If your printer is flagging this as a problem, it could be he's one of the dinosaurs, and you should either go with the flow or find another printer who lives in this century.

  • How to Compress non-image object in Acrobat 9 Pro/Acrobat X Pro

    Hi,
    I am newbie and don't know where to post this question exactly. Forgive me if I am incorrect.
    How can we compress "non-image object" in "Acrobat 9 Pro/Acrobat X Pro"
    Thanks in advance for your suggestion & help.
    Thanks & Regards,
    Raja. S

    Thanks for the reply.
    I want to compress the "non-image" objects (i.e pagragraph contents and not images) for the entire PDF file in the "Acrobat pro X" application manually and not with the tool.
    Please share me if you have any idea on this.
    Thanks,
    Raja. S

Maybe you are looking for