GTT table getting Row Exclusive lock

I have a procedure which loads a table which is used for reporting.
Currently it is a single process which picks up most of the data after joining 2-3 big tables(around 70-80GB) and then loading the main table.
The joins are on PI and also partitions are also being used. Then a lot of updates are done on the main table to update other columns which are being picked from different tables.
As the processing is happening on huge amount of data(around 1M), so processing is taking a lot of time.
This process is taking around 40-45 minutes.
I am planning to use parallelism to run it in 75 sessions. So the initial big insert will be faster and later on all the updates will be done on smaller chunks which will benefit the performance.
I planned to use GTT table so that i dont have to create 75 temp tables for each sessions.
But while using GTT table(ON COMMIT DELETE ROWS) in parallel sessions, i am seeing that the GTT table is getting Row Exclusive lock and the time taken by overall process is increasing by lot.
So i tested by using 75 temp tables. There i saw that the performance has increased by lots as assumed initially.
Please let me know if there is any other way or how to remove the locks on GTT table.

First you should question why you think you need 75 GTT.
Also your question contains no useful information
(no four digit version of Oracle, no OS, no number of processors) , this paragrah
Currently it is a single process which picks up most of the data after joining 2-3 big tables(around 70-80GB) and then loading the main table.
The joins are on PI and also partitions are also being used. Then a lot of updates are done on the main table to update other columns which are being picked from different tables.
As the processing is happening on huge amount of data(around 1M), so processing is taking a lot of time.
This process is taking around 40-45 minutes.tells nothing,
so basically your questions boils down to
- Hey I come from a sqlserver background (this is just an educated guess), how can I find a workaround to wreck Oracle to make it work like sqlserver.
75 parallel sessions on say 4 to 8 processors is a very bad idea, as these sessions will be simple competing for resources.
Also a row exclusive lock is just that: a row level lock. This isn't a problem, usually.
Sybrand Bakker
Senior Oracle DBA

Similar Messages

  • Pl sql row level locking with wait ?

    Hi,
    I am using oracle 10g.
    I am new to Oracle locks. I have two tables Table1(id_no, employee, salary) and Table2(id_no, employee, salary).
    I need to pull any requested row from Table1 into Table2 only once on demand. I have a procedure to pull data and there could be more than one requests try to call same procedure to pull a row from Table1 into Table2 at any given time.
    I coded below to achieve row level lock. if one transaction gets row level lock on Table1 at 2, so other Transactions should wait till the lock is released at line 2 or 5 to avoid duplicates.
    But below code is not working, I am getting duplicates when I call this using two concurrent java threads.
    How do I control this concurrency issue so that I can avoid duplicate entries in Table2. Could any one please help?
    1.begin
    2.select 0 into emp_cnt
    3.from Table1 where id=id_no
    4.for update;
    5.update Table1 set employee='xyz'
    6.where id=id_no;
    7.select count(*) into table2_cnt from Table2 where id=id_no;
    8.if(table2_cnt =0) then
    9.code to insert above row from Table1 to Table2;
    10.end if;
    11.commit;
    12.End;
    Edited by: 980916 on Jan 9, 2013 5:48 PM

    Welcome to the forums and welcome to Oracle.
    Lets establish one thing right from the beginning ... the Oracle Database is not a Microsoft product.
    There is no general reason to use row level locks, you should not want to use row level locks, you don't need row level locks, and you will almost never have any valid reason to consider row level locks.
    That said there are two situations were it may be necessary to lock a row prior to an update or delete (possibly in a merge) and in those cases you want to use the built-in SELECT FOR UPDATE syntax. (Demo here: http://www.morganslibrary.org/reference/deadlocks.html#dlfu). But we should be clear here ... one rarely needs to use this locking mechanism as the chances of a collision in a well designed application are essentially zero.
    Also as you are new to Oracle please explore the dynamic performance view V$RESERVED_WORDS and do not name objects, columns, etc. with reserved word names not that there is an excuse in any product to name a column "ID." Something Joe Celko has railed about for decades and a tradition I think we should all follow.
    In the case of your posted code example (btw please read the FAQ and learn how to use tags) the solution is SELECT FOR UPDATE if locking can be justified which is unlikely.
    Edited by: damorgan on Jan 9, 2013 6:11 PM                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                       

  • Updating  a  row  in  table  exclusive  lock on entire table

    Hi
    We have table master table and few child tables .
    when we try to update a row in master table , it is locking entire table
    i.e seems update process holding exclusive lock on entire table
    it is not allowing any furthur update to that table
    Could you please tell me what could be the problem for that
    Thanks,
    - AK

    Does the table has primary key - foreign key relationship? Try disabling the constraint and see if it works. If it works then it is about unindexed foreign key issue.

  • Unable to update when executed, table gets lock Execution does not stop Execution even for an hour

    Following is my Query unable to update when Executed table gets lock Execution does not stop even for an hour.
    update Employees 
          set Status = 'Close'
          where statusid IN (select statusid 
                                             from MyView 
                                              where DownloadedDate ='2014-07-27 00:00:00.000'
    here Employee contains 3,00,000 of records and Subquery return 1,50,000 Empid 
    i tried in various ways but not able to solve, statusid  column have no index on,  i tried using cursor but it does not work.
    plz let me know how to solve this Issue, THANKS IN ADVANCE.

    Hello,
    You should better post your question to a more related Forum, like Transact-SQL or SQL Server Database Engine; this Forum is for samples & community Projects.
    Have you checked the execution plan if indexes are used?
    You could update the data in chunks, e.g. 10.000 rows per execution. For this you have to add a TOP clause and a filter to update only those, who are not updated yet.
    update TOP (10000) Employees
    set Status = 'Close'
    where statusid IN
    (select statusid
    from MyView
    where DownloadedDate ='2014-07-27 00:00:00.000')
    AND Status <> 'Close'
    Olaf Helper
    [ Blog] [ Xing] [ MVP]

  • Exclusive locks on IFS tables

    We have a servlet application that accesses IFS 9.0.1.1 via the IFS API.
    We are having a problem where sessions are putting an exclusive lock on certain SYS_LOBnnnnnnnnn objects which (in turn) prevents other sessions from gaining an exclusive lock on the ODM_DOCUMENT table.
    Today, the following statement (issued by some IFS API call) was causing an exclusive lock which was never released:
    update odm_document set READBYOWNER := 1 where id = :2
    This statement put an exclusive lock on the SYS_LOB0000046893C00006$$ object and that lock was never released and we had to kill the session.
    Any guidance would be appreciated. Thanks.

    The mappings when run does acquire an exclusive lock on the target table and yes it does only when it is run in set based mode, this is absolutely true. If you run a mapping in set based mode and loading some data in millions it takes an exclusive lock on the target table. You can verify it by querying the v$lock table, or by using the session browser in any of SQL querying tools.
    The problem can be overcome by running in row based mode as suggested by you, but when data volume is huge I dont think the row based mode gives a satisfactory preformance.
    Anyways, thanks for all your suggestions. Lets see if I can find any other way out.

  • GETTING ROW COUNTS OF ALL TABLES AT A TIME

    Is there any column in any Data dictionary table which gives the row counts for particular table..
    My scenario is...i need to get row counts of some 100 tables in our database...
    instead of doing select count(*) for each table....is there any way i can do it?
    similary How to get column counts for each table..in database .For example
    Employee table has 3 columns...empid,empname,deptno....i want count(empid),
    count(empname),count(deptno) ...is there any easy way for finding all column counts of each table in data base? is it possible?

    Why does "select count(mgr) from emp" return null and not 13?Good question ;)
    Seems that xml generation in principle can't handle »counting nulls«:
    SQL> select xmltype(cursor(select null c from dual)) x from dual
    X                                                
    <?xml version="1.0"?>                            
    <ROWSET>                                         
    <ROW>                                           
    </ROW>                                          
    </ROWSET>                                        
    1 row selected.
    SQL> select cursor(select count(null) c from dual) x from dual
    Cur
    0 
    1 row selected.
    SQL> select xmltype(cursor(select count(null) c from dual)) x from dual
    select xmltype(cursor(select count(null) c from dual)) x from dual
    Error at line 1
    ORA-31011: XML parsing failed
    ORA-19202: Error occurred in XML processing
    LPX-00229: input source is empty
    Error at line 0
    ORA-06512: at "SYS.XMLTYPE", line 0
    ORA-06512: at line 1
    but
    SQL> select xmltype(cursor(select count(1) c from dual)) x from dual
    X                                                
    <?xml version="1.0"?>                            
    <ROWSET>                                         
    <ROW>                                           
      <C>1</C>                                       
    </ROW>                                          
    </ROWSET>                                        
    1 row selected.Looks like a bug to me ...

  • Trying to get row counts for all tables at a time

    Hi,
    i am trying to get row counts in database at a time with below query but i am getting error:
    its giving me ora-19202 error..please advise me
    select
          table_name,
          to_number(
            extractvalue(
              xmltype(dbms_xmlgen.getxml('select count(*) c from '||table_name))
              ,'/ROWSET/ROW/C')
              count
        from all_tables;

    ALL_TABLES returns tables/views current user has access to. These tables/views are owned not just by current user. However your code
    dbms_xmlgen.getxml('select count(*) c from '||table_name)does not specify who the owner is. You need to change it to:
    dbms_xmlgen.getxml('select count(*) c from '||owner || '.' || table_name)However, it still will not work. Why? As I said, ALL_TABLES returns tables/views current user has access to. Any type of access, not just SELECT. So if current user is, for example, granted nothing but UPDATE on some table the above select will fail. You would have to filter ALL_TABLES through ALL_SYS_PRIVS, ALL_ROLE_PRIVS, ALL_TAB_PRIVS and PUBLIC to get list of tables current user can select from. For example, code below does it for tables/views owned by current user and tables/views current user is explicitly granted SELECT:
    select
          t.owner,
          t.table_name,
          to_number(
            extractvalue(
              xmltype(dbms_xmlgen.getxml('select count(*) c from '||t.owner || '.' || t.table_name))
              ,'/ROWSET/ROW/C')
              count
        from all_tables t,user_tab_privs p
        where t.owner = p.owner
          and t.table_name = p.table_name
          and privilege = 'SELECT'
    union all
    select
          user,
          t.table_name,
          to_number(
            extractvalue(
              xmltype(dbms_xmlgen.getxml('select count(*) c from '||t.table_name))
              ,'/ROWSET/ROW/C')
              count
        from user_tables t
    OWNER                          TABLE_NAME                                                          COUNT
    SCOTT                          DEPT                                                                    4
    U1                             QAQA                                                                    0
    U1                             TBL                                                                     0
    U1                             EMP                                                                     1
    SQL> SY.

  • Unable to update, when executed table gets lock and Execution does not stop even for an hour.

    Following is my Query, which unables to update. When Executed, table gets lock and Execution does not stop even for an hour.
    update Employees 
          set Status = 'Close'
          where statusid IN (select statusid 
                                             from MyView 
                                              where DownloadedDate ='2014-07-27 00:00:00.000'
    here Employee contains 3,00,000 of records and Subquery return 1,50,000 Empid 
    i tried in various ways but not able to solve, statusid  column have no index on,  i tried using cursor but it does not work.
    plz let me know how to solve this Issue, Its very Important to get solve as all my further work depends on Updation
    , THANKS IN ADVANCE.

    See also your other thread with the same question:
    http://social.msdn.microsoft.com/Forums/en-US/80243625-fc3b-4ee1-bce1-4adcdbc16c14/unable-to-update-when-executed-table-gets-lock-execution-does-not-stop-execution-even-for-an-hour?forum=sqlserversamples
    Olaf Helper
    [ Blog] [ Xing] [ MVP]

  • Monitor exclusive lock on a table and send notification email through EM

    Hi,
    I have Oracle10g and EM10G running on different servers.
    now one of my plsql code creates an exclusive lock on one of my tables.
    i want to monitor this exclusive lock on this table through the EM. and when the exclusive lock on the table is continuing for more than 1 hour, i want an email notification sent to me by the EM.
    How can i do this?
    Can someone help me achieve this above situation.
    Thanks.
    Philip.

    One of the nice about OEM is that a lot of the things are self explanatory. E.g. I never read docs to set up our first user defined metrics. It is really just to dive in there. Define a metric and the sql you want to use for monitoring the lock. Then you just go and create email notification for this when it hits warning or critical treshold.

  • Table gets maintained via Zprogram although it is locked

    Hi Experts,
    I have one doubt ,i am maintaining one table suppose z22_ekko via SM30. As soon as i go to sm30 ,an entry gets created in Central Lock table by SAP
    As you can see this entry (Transaction SM12)
    Table is locked in 'Write Mode (E)' means no other user can maintain same table same time. In other session when i am trying to maintain via 'SM30' it is ok showing error 'Table is locked'. But when i try to maintain z22_ekko via a Z program with modify or Insert statement ,table gets modified although it is locked . How is it possible? If table is locked it should not allow user to modify via Zprogram also.
    please clarify this doubt.
    Regards,
    A.Trivedi

    Hi Ashish,
         If we try to visualise the SAP as a product deeply, we will realise that SAP is nothing but the same existing java .net c c++ technology where in it stores data using the similar RDMS concepts. Then what makes it different, Standardization of not only business process but also the way a developer diggs into the code. If using some standard function module we try to update a table it wont update it will say object is locked.
         Standard Procedure
              1.   Check object(table) is locked or not
              2a. If locked then show message
              2b. if not locked then lock the object
              3.   update/insert into table
              4.   unlock the table.
         Non Standard way(directly to step 3)
              update/insert into table
         So physically the tables are not locked using SM30. These are conceputally locked by lock objects using ENQUEUE and DEQUEUE. Hence we check these locks we will find the table as locked and we will not read it. Logically its always open.
    For details try out this link
    http://help.sap.com/erp2005_ehp_06/helpdata/EN/91/01274dc2e048d4b473fe5c45ae4e29/frameset.htm
    I hope this might help you
    HAPPY ABAPing
    -VIshal

  • Query to get rows betwen x and y + table total row count

    Hi,
    I try get rows between e.g. 100 and 150 when I sort by some column
    My query is now like this
    SELECT  *
    FROM
      (SELECT a.*,
        row_number() OVER (ORDER BY OWNER ASC) rn,
        COUNT(1) over() mrn
      FROM (SELECT * FROM all_objects) a
    WHERE ROWNUM BETWEEN least(100,mrn) AND 150It is not very fast if I run that kind select from big table
    Any tips to optimize this query?
    Regards,
    Jari

    Hi,
    I'm so bad with SQL :(
    Here is sample where I need that kind query.
    http://actionet.homelinux.net/htmldb/f?p=100:504
    It looks standard Apex report but it is not.
    It is just test to use query to output html using htp package
    I send parameter start row, max rows, column I like order by.
    Now I do query for cursor
        /* Report query */
        l_sql := '
          SELECT * FROM(
            SELECT a.*, row_number() OVER (ORDER BY '
            || l_sort_col
            || ' '
            || l_sort_ord
            || ') rn, COUNT(1) over() mrn
            FROM(' || l_sql || ') a
          ) WHERE rn BETWEEN LEAST(' || l_start_row || ',mrn) AND ' || l_last_row
        ;Then I loop cursor and output html.
    You can order report by click heading and there is that pagination
    I did not know that I could find examples by "pagination query" =), thanks for that tip for both of you.
    I know Apex have reports ,
    but I need have features that Apex templates can not provide at least yet.
    So I have study that generating html tables using custom package instead Apex report should be best approach to get layouts I need.
    Regards,
    Jari
    Edited by: jarola on Jan 21, 2011 10:38 PM

  • Can not get exclusive lock on the shared drive of Azure file storage

    One of my application need exclusive access on the data folder where it writes the data.
    I have setup data folder in Z drive which is shared drive of Azure File system.
    The application is not able to get the exclusive access on the data folder and throws IO exception.
    Is that not possible with shared drive of azure file system

    Hi Subodh,
    You could refer the following link for details on how pessimistic concurrency (Exclusive lock) managed in Azure Storage:
    http://azure.microsoft.com/blog/2014/09/08/managing-concurrency-in-microsoft-azure-storage-2/
    Please be advised that an Exclusive lock on an Azure File Share is not possible using REST Protocol and need to be done using the SMB Protocol.
    You could refer the following link for details on how to manage SMB File locking:
    https://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/azure/dn194265.aspx?f=255&MSPPError=-2147217396
    Hope this helps.
    Regards,
    Malar.

  • How to get row index in dynamically populated table?

    Hi,
    I am following example given in http://balusc.xs4all.nl/srv/dev-jep-dat.html to Dynamically populate datatable. How can I get row index while populating table in populateDynamicDataTable() method
    private List myList;
    private String[] headers; // Optional.
    private HtmlDataTable dynamicDataTable;
    // Actions ----------------------------------------------------------
    public void loadMyList() {
    // Set headers (optional).
    headers = new String[] {"header1", "header2", "header3"};
    // Set rows. This is a stub example, just do your dynamic thing.
    String[] row1 = {"ID1", "Name1", "Value1"};
    String[] row2 = {"ID2", "Name2", "Value2"};
    String[] row3 = {"ID3", "Name3", "Value3"};
    // Convert rows to List and set the List.
    myList = new ArrayList();
    myList.add(Arrays.asList(row1));
    myList.add(Arrays.asList(row2));
    myList.add(Arrays.asList(row3));
    public void populateDynamicDataTable() {
    //*********************** I want current row in this method *************//
    // Any columns?
    if (myList != null && myList.size() > 0) {
    dynamicDataTable = new HtmlDataTable();
    // Get amount of columns.
    int columns = ((List) myList.get(0)).size();
    // Set columns.
    for (int i = 0; i < columns; i++) {
    // Set header (optional).
    UIOutput header = new UIOutput();
    header.setValue(headers);
    // Set output.
    UIOutput output = new UIOutput();
    ValueBinding myItem =
    FacesContext
    .getCurrentInstance()
    .getApplication()
    .createValueBinding("#{myItem[" + i + "]}");
    output.setValueBinding("value", myItem);
    // Set column.
    UIColumn column = new UIColumn();
    column.setHeader(header);
    column.getChildren().add(output);
    // Add column.
    dynamicDataTable.getChildren().add(column);
    // Getters ----------------------------------------------------------
    public List getMyList() {
    return myList;
    public HtmlDataTable getDynamicDataTable() {
    if (dynamicDataTable == null) {
    loadMyList(); // Reload to get most recent data.
    populateDynamicDataTable();
    return dynamicDataTable;
    // Setters ----------------------------------------------------------
    public void setMyList(List myList) {
    this.myList = myList;
    public void setDynamicDataTable(HtmlDataTable dynamicDataTable) {
    this.dynamicDataTable = dynamicDataTable;
    I have tried dynamicDataTable.getRowIndex, but it returns -1
    Is there any other way?
    Thanks ,
    Chitra.

    When you dynamically populate a datatable, you're populating the columns, not the actual rows.
    Just add EL to the styleClass attribute, like:styleClass="#{myBean.myTable.rowIndex == 1 ? 'highlightedClass' : 'defaultClass'}"where 'myTable' refers to a HtmlDataTable property in the backing bean.

  • Suppress warnings re exclusive locking

    We're using ASE 15.7 on Windows but this may apply to other platforms. Certain stored procs where we're locking a table in exclusive mode inside a trans generate warnings: (number 12103, Severity 10)
    Table 'x' in database 'y' was not locked in 'exclusive' mode because a covering lock in 'exclusive' mode was found.
    I guess I have 2 questions - are we doing something wrong that's causing this and is there a way to suppress these?  According to the docs it's informational.

    Hi David,
    You aren't doing anything particularly wrong.
    If you were writing your own reporting client using the Open Client SDK, or perhaps using some existing client that had some features for defining error handlers, you avoid seeing the message by using an error handler that did not output it.  If you are using a general purpose client like isql, there currently isn't a way to directly surpress output of the message.  There is an open feature request for that, CR 234335.  However, it has been open since 2001, and I don't expect to see any action on it soon.  (You could open an incident to express your interest in it and increase its priority if you wish).  However, there is also a way to just avoid the message in the first place.
    The message is output when you use LOCK TABLE to request a lock that you already have.
    You can avoid it by checking master..syslocks to see if you already have such a lock and only calling LOCK TABLE if you don't have it.
    if not exists (
                        select id from master..syslocks
                        where id = object_id("t1")
                        and type = 1
                        and spid = @@spid
    begin
          lock table t1 in exclusive mode
    end
    ------  demonstration:
    create table t1 (c1 int)
    go
    begin tran
    lock table t1 in exclusive mode - - create an existing exlusive table lock
    go
    lock table t1 in exclusive mode  -- try to get another exclusive table lock
    go                                               -- this outputs the message
    if not exists (select id from master..syslocks
      where id = object_id("t1")
      and type = 1
      and spid = @@spid)
    begin
    lock table t1 in exclusive mode
    end
    go                                                  -- this does not output the message
    rollback tran
    go
    id          dbid   page       type   spid   class
             fid    context row    loid        partitionid nodeid
    (0 rows affected)
    id          dbid   page       type   spid   class
             fid    context row    loid        partitionid nodeid
       576002052      6          0      1     14 Non Cursor Lock
                  0       0      0          28           0   NULL
    (1 row affected)

  • Row level locks

    Hi All,
    Version - Oracle Database 10g Enterprise Edition Release 10.2.0.2.0
    I have a card's data in a table. Whenver a two different sessions/threads selects the data sometimes they get the same card.
    Now I need to lock the record. If Thred-1 selects then it will lock the first records and thread-2 must select the second record as the first record is locked by thread-1.
    I have written a piece of code , at first session it locks one record and when second session select it selects no records.
    I have takem MIN group function because I want the cards to be selected in order.
    Can you please tell where is my code went wrong or need some changes. Data and code is given below.
    SQL> SELECT * FROM crm_pps_cards_sz ORDER BY 1;
    CARD_NO          PIN  SERIAL_NUMBER DATE_CREATED DATE_MERGED DATE_ALLOCATED DATE_REGISTERED
    6338079966430591 9985 9950013661    12/06/2011                             
    6338079973369543 6858 9950013660    12/06/2011                             
    6338079978994154 7144 9950013655    12/06/2011                             
    6338079981471778 7631 9950013654    12/06/2011                             
    6338079986365041 7849 9950013657    12/06/2011                             
    SQL>
    Thread - 1
    Connected to Oracle Database 10g Enterprise Edition Release 10.2.0.2.0
    Connected as crm
    SQL> set serveroutput on
    SQL>
    SQL> DECLARE
      2    l_rec crm_pps_cards_sz%ROWTYPE;
      3    CURSOR c IS
      4      SELECT * FROM crm_pps_cards_sz t WHERE t.card_no =
      5      (SELECT MIN(card_no) card FROM crm_pps_cards_sz)
      6      FOR UPDATE NOWAIT SKIP LOCKED;
      7 
      8  BEGIN
      9    OPEN c;
    10    FETCH c
    11      INTO l_rec;
    12    CLOSE c;
    13    dbms_output.put_line('Card Allocated ' || l_rec.card_no);
    14 
    15  END;
    16  /
    Card Allocated 6338079966430591
    PL/SQL procedure successfully completed
    SQL>
    Thread - 2
    Connected to Oracle Database 10g Enterprise Edition Release 10.2.0.2.0
    Connected as crm
    SQL> set serveroutput on
    SQL>
    SQL> DECLARE
      2    l_rec crm_pps_cards_sz%ROWTYPE;
      3    CURSOR c IS
      4      SELECT * FROM crm_pps_cards_sz t WHERE t.card_no =
      5      (SELECT MIN(card_no) card FROM crm_pps_cards_sz)
      6      FOR UPDATE NOWAIT SKIP LOCKED;
      7 
      8  BEGIN
      9    OPEN c;
    10    FETCH c
    11      INTO l_rec;
    12    CLOSE c;
    13    dbms_output.put_line('Card Allocated ' || l_rec.card_no);
    14 
    15  END;
    16  /
    Card Allocated
    PL/SQL procedure successfully completed
    SQL> My concern is that it must allocate in the order
    6338079966430591
    6338079973369543
    ....

    It is because MIN(ard_no) is able to find value from table which is locked by you thread 1 and thread 1 mentioned NOWAIT thus it thread 2 went out without getting anything.
    Please check my reply to your duplicate thread "row level locking" .

Maybe you are looking for

  • Sync multiple iPhones and iPod Touch's to one PC

    I am going to have one iPhone 4 32GB and two iPod Touch 8GB's with one PC. I read up on how to sync different playlists to each device. However, I am unclear on how to sync different Apps to each device. The iPods I will have are much smaller capacit

  • Photos from iPhoto into Photoshop look pixelated

    Photos that look beautiful in iPhoto and Preview, when opened in CS3 look pixelated.  Same dimensions pixels, 3264 x 2448.  Tried exporting from iPhoto to desktop at maximum quality and then opening as Smart Objects but still pixelated!  Print pixela

  • Supported Video Cards

    Hi Gang! Does anyone know where i might be able to find a list of supported video cards for the Apple Cinema 23" HD display. Our company finally upgraded our standard from the 20" ACD, and today we received our first 23" HD display. Woo Hoo! I connec

  • Write ABAP routine in transformation rule

    Dear all, I am very new to ABAP. Currently I would like to transfer some data from cube A to cube B. The problem is Cube A and B have different Unit of Mesure. The product standard cost is based on each Item's UOM. For example: Cube A data: ItemNo } 

  • ABAP List Viewer help

    Hi. I have a abap list viewer, when I do a filter by the first name with 'XXXX' the program doesn't find any data, but if no filter as been done the XXXX appears. How can I solve this?