Having doubt on logical operators and,or .

I have written a query like
select ename from emp where mgr=7902 or sal=1600 and job='salesman';
The o/p of above query is
ename
smith
I unable to understand the o/p it has given for me .
the table is
EMPNO ENAME JOB MGR HIREDATE SAL COMM DEPTNO
7369 SMITH CLERK 7902 17-DEC-80 800 20
7499 ALLEN SALESMAN 7698 20-FEB-81 1600 300 30
7521 WARD SALESMAN 7698 22-FEB-81 1250 500 30
7566 JONES MANAGER 7839 02-APR-81 2975 20
7654 MARTIN SALESMAN 7698 28-SEP-81 1250 1400 30
7698 BLAKE MANAGER 7839 01-MAY-81 2850 30
7782 CLARK MANAGER 7839 09-JUN-81 2450 10
7788 SCOTT ANALYST 7566 19-APR-87 3000 20
7839 KING PRESIDENT 17-NOV-81 5000 10
7844 TURNER SALESMAN 7698 08-SEP-81 1500 0 30
7876 ADAMS CLERK 7788 23-MAY-87 1100 20
EMPNO ENAME JOB MGR HIREDATE SAL COMM DEPTNO
7900 JAMES CLERK 7698 03-DEC-81 950 30
7902 FORD ANALYST 7566 03-DEC-81 3000 20
7934 MILLER CLERK 7782 23-JAN-82 1300 10

Hi,
welcome to the forum.
Please read SQL and PL/SQL FAQ
Additionally when you put some code please enclose it between two lines starting with {noformat}{noformat}
i.e.:
{noformat}{noformat}
SELECT ...
{noformat}{noformat}
Regarding your query the problem is the case of literal 'salesman':select ename from emp where mgr=7902 or sal=1600 and job='SALESMAN';
ENAME
SMITH
ALLEN
Regards.
Al

Similar Messages

Query form requires Logical operators and/or Quotes

In ORACLE 9I Jdeveloper beta I used the BC4J JSP wizard to create a - Query Form. The query form looks nice and runs except I have to also include the logical operators (= > <) and Quotes. For example to query on the name Joe I have to enter it as ="JOE". If I use JOE it gives me a JSP error. The error message shows the generated Select statment with the where clause JOE but is missing the "=" and quotes.
How do I hard code the "=" and quotes around strings so that the user doesn't have to?

In ORACLE 9I Jdeveloper beta I used the BC4J JSP wizard to create a - Query Form. The query form looks nice and runs except I have to also include the logical operators (= > <) and Quotes. For example to query on the name Joe I have to enter it as ="JOE". If I use JOE it gives me a JSP error. The error message shows the generated Select statment with the where clause JOE but is missing the "=" and quotes.
How do I hard code the "=" and quotes around strings so that the user doesn't have to?

I am having trouble with Logic 7 and my Motu 828mkII

I am running Logic Pro 7 with a MOTU 828mkII. Logic is not seeing the audio signal from any of the rear analog inputs on my 828. The 828 is receiving the signal and I have fiddled with cuemix to make sure everything is as it should be. Motu support said that it was a logic issue, in spite of that, I sent the unit back to them to fix it and it returned with the same issue, that it is working but logic is not. I am doing something wrong. . . please tell me what it is. thanks!

What do you have selected in the drivers menu in audio hardware prefs?

Logical operators in Oracle select query

Hello all,
Can i use logical operators in oracle select queries?
for 1 and 0 =0 ; 1 or 0 =0
if i have two fileds in a table COL1 have a value of 1010 and COL2 have a value of 0001.
Is there any way to use select col1 or col2 from table? where or is a logical operator?
Regards,

Hi,
NB wrote:
Hello all,
Can i use logical operators in oracle select queries?Sure; Oracle has the logical operators AND, NOT and OR. All the comparison operators, including >, >=, = !=, EXISTS, IN, IS NULL, LIKE and REGEXP_LIKE are really logical operators, since they return logical values. You can use them in SELECT statements, and other places, too.
for 1 and 0 =0 ; 1 or 0 =0
if i have two fileds in a table COL1 have a value of 1010 and COL2 have a value of 0001.It's unclear what you want. Maybe you'd be interested in the BITAND function:
http://download.oracle.com/docs/cd/B28359_01/server.111/b28286/functions014.htm#sthref1080
BITAND is the only logical function that I know of. Many other functions, especially numberical fucntions such as MOD, have applications in logic.
Is there any way to use select col1 or col2 from table? where or is a logical operator?Whenever you have a question, please post a little sample data (CREATE TABLE and INSERT statements), and also post the results you want from that data.
Explain how you get those results from that data.
Always say which version of Oracle you're using.

Spatial query w/ logical operators in a subquery on Linux using Oracle 1

Hello...
I'm being given XML that I need to parse and create SQL from it. Below my signature is the SQL that I generate (its a simple example) and can be more elaborate due to the logical operators (AND and OR) given in the XML.
The problem that we're seeing is performance-based: when one of the logical operator queries is Spatial-based, like below. Running it in JDBC, the query never returns.
The spatial query just by itself returns ~300 rows (takes approximately 0.2 seconds). The "PERCENTAGE" query by itself returns about ~40000 rows (takes approximately ~.8 seconds).
If we run the query below with 2 non-spatial subqueries, the result returns and performance is very acceptable (~ 0.9 seconds)-- the result set is about 80000 rows.
Thanks,
Jim
=========================
SELECT
COLUMN_WE_WANT , RESULTS
FROM
TABLE_A
WHERE
COLUMN_WE_WANT IN
SELECT
COLUMN_WE_WANT
FROM
TABLE_A
WHERE
SDO_OVERLAPBDYINTERSECT(TABLE_A.MY_SPATIAL_COLUMN,
SDO_GEOMETRY(2003,
4326,
null,
SDO_elem_info_array( 1 , 3 , 1 ),
SDO_ORDINATE_ARRAY( lng_1,lat_1 , lng_2,lat_2 , lng_3,lat_3 , lng_4,lat_4 , lng_1,lat_1 )
) = 'TRUE'
OR
COLUMN_WE_WANT IN
SELECT
COLUMN_WE_WANT
FROM
TABLE_B
WHERE
SOME_PERCENTAGE_RATE_COLUMN < 90
)

Its difficult to comment without seeing the execution plan. You should trace this query to get a better idea of exactly what's happening.
Depending on the complexity of the logical operators, I would look at doing this using set operations. So for an OR you might have...
SELECT COLUMN_WE_WANT, RESULTS
FROM TABLE_A
WHERE COLUMN_WE_WANT IN (
     SELECT COLUMN_WE_WANT
     FROM TABLE_A
     WHERE SDO_OVERLAPBDYINTERSECT(TABLE_A.MY_SPATIAL_COLUMN,SDO_GEOMETRY(2003,4326,
     NULL, SDO_elem_info_array( 1 , 3 , 1 ),
     SDO_ORDINATE_ARRAY( lng_1,lat_1 , lng_2,lat_2 , lng_3,lat_3 , lng_4,lat_4 , lng_1,lat_1 ) )) = 'TRUE'
UNION
     SELECT COLUMN_WE_WANT
     FROM TABLE_B
     WHERE SOME_PERCENTAGE_RATE_COLUMN < 90)For an AND, you would use INTERSECT.
Edited by: Reggie to remove the extra INTERSECT

Spatial query w/ logical operators in a subquery on Linux using Oracle 10g

Hello...
I'm being given XML that I need to parse and create SQL from it. Below my signature is the SQL that I generate (its a simple example) and can be more elaborate due to the logical operators (AND and OR) given in the XML.
The problem that we're seeing is performance-based: when one of the logical operator queries is Spatial-based, like below. Running it in JDBC, the query never returns.
The spatial query just by itself returns ~300 rows (takes approximately 0.2 seconds). The "PERCENTAGE" query by itself returns about ~40000 rows (takes approximately ~.8 seconds).
If we run the query below with 2 non-spatial subqueries, the result returns and performance is very acceptable (~ 0.9 seconds)-- the result set is about 80000 rows.
Thanks,
Jim
=========================
SELECT
COLUMN_WE_WANT , RESULTS
FROM
TABLE_A
WHERE
COLUMN_WE_WANT IN
SELECT
COLUMN_WE_WANT
FROM
TABLE_A
WHERE
SDO_OVERLAPBDYINTERSECT(TABLE_A.MY_SPATIAL_COLUMN,
SDO_GEOMETRY(2003,
4326,
null,
SDO_elem_info_array( 1 , 3 , 1 ),
SDO_ORDINATE_ARRAY( lng_1,lat_1 , lng_2,lat_2 , lng_3,lat_3 , lng_4,lat_4 , lng_1,lat_1 ) )
) = 'TRUE'
OR
COLUMN_WE_WANT IN
SELECT
COLUMN_WE_WANT
FROM
TABLE_B
WHERE
SOME_PERCENTAGE_RATE_COLUMN < 90
)

There is a spatial forum. You will likely have a far better experience there.

Search format with logical operators in TREX

We've activated the index for business object BUS1001006 for material master on SES_ADMIN. The index was created successfully and the two new search help was activated as well. Now testing it in development, I'm trying to figure out how you include logical operators (AND, OR, etc...) inside your search term.
For example I want to search materials that has ADAPTOR or AMPLIFIER. If I specify exactly "ADAPTOR or AMPLIFIER" (without the quotes) it does not return any search results.
I'm trying this both on the two new search help and on program COM_SE_SEARCH_IIF_TEST.
Can you let me know how to do this please ?
Thanks in advance.

You have to distinguish between attribute search and full text search:
In attribute search you can use logical operators by using the generic Select Options just like in any other search help.
In full text search all entered search words are interpreted with AND conditions.
If you just press the generic F1 for help on the field "Full Text Search" you will receive the complete standard documentation.
OR conditions in full text search are not supported because of the restrictions of the generic F4 UI.
If you want to support OR conditions you should consider installing the SAP product NetWeaver Enterprise Search. The full text search in it's generic search UI contains a query parser that supports the following (and more) features:
[http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nwes72/helpdata/en/d0/297dfa25a24a57a31e8364ee2ad7eb/frameset.htm]
Instead of contructing OR conditions it's sometimes much more convenient to browse with NetWeaver Enterprise Search through the distinct value lists of attributes: Read "Narrowing Down Results" in:
[http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nwes72/helpdata/en/df/f2fb01b6844246b121497b633d83a5/frameset.htm]
Enjoy! - Klaus

Logical operators -- convert OR to ||

Is there anyway to build an if statement from words such as AND,OR?
I have expression language in xml and I'd like to somehow convert that to a java representation.
The only way I can think of is auto generating source, compiling, then running. But that's not something I really want to get into.
Just wondering if anyone has any ideas other than generating source.
I just thought if I can change the xml to have something like if("myval".equals("test")) or "myval".equals("test1")) and then I can just do the conversion to logical operators and return a boolean if the statement is true or false.

ForumKid2 wrote:
Is there anyway to build an if statement from words such as AND,OR?
I have expression language in xml and I'd like to somehow convert that to a java representation.
The only way I can think of is auto generating source, compiling, then running. But that's not something I really want to get into.
Just wondering if anyone has any ideas other than generating source.1. Parse to intermediate form
2. Write an interpreter to run that form.
3. Run the interpreter.

I am having major issues with Logic 8 and want to reinstall.

I am having a lot of issues with Logic 8 and want to do a re-install. What is the procedure and what do I need to uninstall first. I need to be careful, because I don't want to affect my Logic 7.
Any suggestions?

What problems?
The first thing to do is trash the preferences. As far as affecting Logic 7, once you install 8, 7 is "forgotten" about. I'm assuming your L8 is a real version, not a "borrowed from the interweb" one.

Logical operators using "AND" and "OR" operators

I currently have written code which has two for loops to search a user query. I am able to search user queries entered for a simple and composed query. Eg. Simple query can be "Hello" and composed query can be "Hello World".
What i would like to do now is be able to use logical operators such as "AND", "OR" when searching e.g. "Hello AND World" or "Hello OR World" Once this is done i would like to score the highest point depending on where the query is found.
Could someone please help me with either giving me some tips of going about this or some starting code and hints. I have attached some code below which explains what i am currently doing to do the simple query.
private void SearchButtonActionPerformed(java.awt.event.ActionEvent evt) {
/* Gets the simple query enterted into the text field. It then looks at the strippedFile in memmory */
long start = System.currentTimeMillis();
// long elapsed = System.currentTimeMillis() - start;
String userQuery = SearchTextField.getText();
StringTokenizer userQ = new StringTokenizer(userQuery);
String[] brokenStrings = new String[userQ.countTokens()];
int counter2 = 0;
while (userQ.hasMoreTokens()) {
String moreStrings = userQ.nextToken();
brokenStrings[counter2] = moreStrings;
counter2++;
int Simplematches = 0;
for (int i = 0; i < strippedFile.length; i++) {
String LongCurrentLine = strippedFile;
StringTokenizer st = new StringTokenizer(LongCurrentLine);
String[] currentline = new String[st.countTokens()];
int counter = 0;
while (st.hasMoreTokens()) {
String moreStrings1 = st.nextToken();
currentline[counter] = moreStrings1;
counter++;
highlighter.highlight(HTMLOutputTextArea, userQuery);
for (int j = 0; j < brokenStrings.length; j++) {
for (int k = 0; k < currentline.length; k++) {
if (brokenStrings[j].equalsIgnoreCase(currentline[k])) {
long elapsed = System.currentTimeMillis() - start;
Simplematches++;
String output = "\"" + currentline[k] + "\" was found on line " + (i + 1) + "." + " At postion " + (k + 1) + " and took " + elapsed + " milliseconds." + " Found " + Simplematches + " matches" + "\n";
//String output = "\"" + currentline[k] + "\" was found on line " + (i + 1)+ "." + " At postion " + (k + 1) + " Found "+ Simplematches+ " matches"+ "\n";

jschell wrote:
london_guy86 wrote:
jschell wrote:
Not clear what you search, but....
First you need to specifically define the syntax. For example what does the following mean?
a OR b AND c OR d
Once you do that then you parse the input to create an expression tree. Then you write an interpreter to run the expression tree.Is there any chance you could give me a starter code or soe sources i could look at. I really dont understand how to go about doing what you have mentioned. As in i have declared the syntax at the moment and i am then using the replaceAll() and calling in what i have declared. with empty strings.
Is this what you mean?Hard to say since I don't understand your statement.
There are three parts
1. Parse the expression.
2. Interpret the expression
3. Do the "search", this is actually part of 2 however it should be possible to implement some or all of it separate from 1 and 2.
Do NOT mix the three parts until you are ready to mix them.
Your posted code is mixing them.
Presumably what you posted is mostly search. So to start re-write JUST the search code as a class.
However you can't really do that until you define what the expressions do.After doing everything you mentioned do you think it would be hard to get a score on the best match search found?
If not could you also give me some tips towards that if you know any.
Thanks

"LOGIC PRO X: Disk is too slow or System Overload. (-10010)" This is the message that I was having since two weeks ago with my Logic 9. I updated two days ago to Logic X and I am still having the same problem.

"LOGIC PRO X: Disk is too slow or System Overload. (-10010)" This is the message that I was having since two weeks ago with my Logic 9. I updated two days ago to Logic X and I am still having the same problem.
I recently formatted my computer. In other words, I'm not using too much memory of my HD. My Memory Ram is 8GB.

dandotcraig wrote:
A week before logic X comes out it starts bugging out... i deleted a bunch of stuff on my HD and cleaned up everything... didnt fix anything... then logic x came out and I though oh i better update that will fix everything... and im still having the same problems... its rediculous.
Umm,, no offence... but what is ridiculous... is you didn't troubleshoot the original problem but instead you assumed it was a LP9 problem so you updated to LPX which is still in its early days and is likely to be less stable than LP9... rather than more so!
So.. Here's the thing....
LP9 was working fine and then stopped working normally according to you. Therefore what changed at the time LP9 stopped working normally?
Here are just a few ideas to think about.. for around the time this started..
Did you update Logic Pro 9... OS X... Drivers for Midi/Audio or other connected devices?
If you did, did you then restore from a backup you made prior to these problems occuring and what happened when you did so? (assuming you do make backups of your system?)
Did you install any new Apps on your Mac?
Did you add a new Hard Drive? How is it formatted?
Did you start recording or creating music in a different way to how you used to before the problem started?
Have you started using a different SI or FX plugin or plugins.. More or different FX for example.. Did you install a new version of a plugin?
Is all your software legal? (Have to ask because some people install all kinds of illegal plugins and whatever else.. and have no idea how the 'cracks' work or what they might affect/mess up/conflict with in the process)
Have you looked at the System logs to see if anything is happening out of the ordinary when you get these messages?
Have you looked at OS X's Activity monitor to see if any app or routine is kicking in hard when you get this issue?
Basically, you need to think about and look for what changed... because something apparently changed to suddenly cause these issues...given you said you didn't have them until a certain timeframe and some of the questions above, I hope, will get you thinking..
....and maybe a few of the others here will come up with other ideas and suggestions to help you...
Good luck and let us know how you got on...

Vivado 2015.2: Simulation and synthesis reverse bit order of std_logic_vector in logical operators

In both simulation and synthesis the logical operators on std_logic_vector bit-reverse the operands in the result, at least in the case where the result of the expression is passed to a function.
I suspect this issue applies to other operators as well, though I have only tested the problem with the logical operators. I also suspect the issue exists in other situations where a function is not involved.
This is incompatible with both ModelSim simulation and XST synthesis and it breaks a lot of our code.
The attached xsim7.vhd example shows the issue. The xsim7.tcl script will run the Vivado simulation. Under Windows, the xsim7.bat will run the whole thing. The xsim7.xpr project file allows synthesis under Vivado, and you can look at the schematic to see the issue in the synthesized netlist.
The source module also simulates under ModelSim and synthesizes under XST, and these show what I believe to be correct behavior.
Can someone please verify this error and either file a CR or tell me to file an SR?
Ian Lewis
www.mstarlabs.com

Hello Bharath,
When I said "what was index 'LOW becomes index 'HIGH" I meant the 'LOW of the source operands and the 'HIGH of the result, independent of the actual index range. I would have no problem with any 'HIGH and 'LOW on the result of the operator as long as the direction matched the left source operand, though personally I would prefer the same 'HIGH and 'LOW as that of the left operand.
Looking at the IEEE implementation of logical "or" on std_logic_vector from package std_logic_1164: https://standards.ieee.org/downloads/1076/1076.2-1996/std_logic_1164-body.vhdl:
-- or
FUNCTION "or" ( l,r : std_logic_vector ) RETURN std_logic_vector IS
ALIAS lv : std_logic_vector ( 1 TO l'LENGTH ) IS l;
ALIAS rv : std_logic_vector ( 1 TO r'LENGTH ) IS r;
VARIABLE result : std_logic_vector ( 1 TO l'LENGTH );
BEGIN
IF ( l'LENGTH /= r'LENGTH ) THEN
ASSERT FALSE
REPORT "arguments of overloaded 'or' operator are not of the same length"
SEVERITY FAILURE;
ELSE
FOR i IN result'RANGE LOOP
result(i) := or_table (lv(i), rv(i));
END LOOP;
END IF;
RETURN result;
END "or";
the operator does exactly what Vivado seems to be doing: alias the downto source vectors to a to range of 1 to 'LENGTH and then return a vector of 1 to 'LENGTH. This both bit reverses the downto indexes (the alias on the source operands does that) and changes the range to "to" with a 'LOW value of 1.
This gives us the 'LEFT 1 and 'RIGHT 4 we see.
So far, I have found no definition from IEEE of what logical operators, such as "or", are supposed to do on std_logic_vector except as defined by this piece of code for "or" and the other operators' associated bodies from the std_logic_1164 package.
What this code does seems like a horrible decision about how to implement the logical operators on std_logic_vector with respect to range direction, but it is compatible with what Vivado does, and incompatible with what XST does. (I had never investigated this issue before because what ModelSim and XST did made perfect sense to me.)
That the assignment (Result := s) works as expected, makes sense. The assignment of the "to" range s to the "downto" range Result maintains the 'LEFT relationship. That is, Result'LEFT (index 3) receives s'LEFT (index 1). So, the bits are reversed a second time.
That ISIM does not match what XST does seems like a defect no matter how you look at it. Your simulation can never match your synthesis if you care about the range direction inside a function (and I suspect in other places too). This deserves an SR or CR if you are still doing any work on those two tools. I think you may not be.
Are you able to find out whether Vivado was changed from XST on purpose with respect to the behavior of logical operators?
If this is "as designed" then I have to start working on updating our code to live with it. But, if this is something that happened by accident, and you will change Vivado to match XST, then I probably want to wait. Updating our code to live with this behavior is going to be a pretty big job.
Thank you for your help,
Ian

Images XOR, AND, etc... logical operators to compare two distinct objects

is there a way of comper two images without comparing all it bytes...
the problem: actually I�m parsing the values of the bytes of the two images and then comparing it...
idea: if I have the two byte arrays containing the image info.. may I use a logical operator to compare these objects ??

FelipeGaucho again,
Did you come up with an optimized method for logical operators? I actually want to perform the boolean operations to turn most pixels of an image to zero, then compress that (as in your post 'String compressor II'). Are these two posts related for you as well? They are separated by several months.
abnormal,
I'm assuming that Java's classes would be optimized, but if my code will execute at the same speed as theirs, then I guess I can stop searching for optimized (or already provided) classes. Do you know if Java's provided classes run faster than classes we create? I'm going to test the provided System.arraycopy against my own while waiting for a reply.

Having logic board and inverter replaced - will post results.

My MBP is afflicted with the CPU whine and the LCD whine, not to mention the "Moo". I solved the Airport not connecting automatically issue on my own.
Talked to Apple about the whines, they wanted me to take it to the local guys, which I was happy to do. I dropped it off this morning, going to pick it up after work.
They are ordering me a replacement logic board, and the inverter (at my request). I will keep my MBP until they come in and then they will swap the new parts in.
I'm guessing it won't be a short wait for the parts, but I will follow up in this thread detailing further results and noise levels.
Personally, I am very impressed with the local service response. They agreed to get the inverter at my request even after opening it up and finding the noise to all eb coming from the logic board.
I know it ***** to wait... but there is more to come. Any questions about my specific machine, etc; post and I will answer.

BrenM - Good luck with your MBP! I hope the replacement logic board and inverter resolve the issues.
As for me, my MBP has been at an Apple Authorized Service Provider in Oakville, Ontario for about a week and a half. They first ordered a replacement logic board, which came from California ... took 2 or 3 days. Unfortunately the replacement logic board did not resolve the high-pitched "whine" issue. The tech told me it is quieter, but not gone .... So on Monday he advised me that they are replacing the inverter, which is on order. They expect to receive it on Wednesday. To be honest, I don't think the inverter will address the high-pitched "whine", as I've been following this issue on here very closely. But it probably will resolve the buzz from the screen when adjusting the brightness, so that's good.
The ASP that I took my MBP to in Oakville has been great. They're really on the ball with it and I know they are doing the best they can. But what it really comes down to is ... if Apple doesn't have an issue to this high-pitched "whine", there's not much the ASP can do. I appreciate them replacing the logic board and inverter, but it's really Apple that needs to get their act in gear and resolve this once and for all. The MBP's have been out for what ... 5-6 weeks now? This has been a hot topic ever since people starting receiving their MBP's, and Apple needs to face the fact that people are not going to let this go until a solution is provided.
The ASP told me that if after replacing the inverter it is still not resolved, I'll need to put up with it until Apple resolves the issue, as there's nothing else they can do. I asked him - what if it takes Apple 2-3 months to resolve the issue? He said I can bring it right back in to have it fixed. So that's good.
The other thing I was considering is when I get my MBP back, to contact Customer Relations and put up a fuss to receive a replacement. But ... then the replacement will probably have the high-pitched "whine". I don't know what to do at this point. It sort of bothers me that my $3000 MBP is no longer pristine, as it has been serviced and received replacement parts ... what do you guys think? Should i be firm with customer relations and (politely) demand a repacement?

Control Logic Operators for D\A output.

SignalExpress (SE) has been quick to setup measurement from an A\D. These reading need to be used as inputs to logic to determine if an output current should be activated.
Logic operators should include:
* <, >, =
* boolean: and, or
* control: if (condition1 and condition2 and condition 3) then, turn on current.
It is unclear if SE is the right tool for the job. If you have SE experience implementing these functions, please weigh-in with actionable guidance. If you work for NI, please indicate as well. Thank you.

Hi gatorback,
From what you said, I doubt that SignalExpress will be able to do what you want. If your application requires a relatively low update speed (10ish times a second or less), you may be able to get away with using LabVIEW to build your control logic, and setting up the logic in LabVIEW would be fairly easy. Could you tell us a bit more about your application and what you are trying to accomplish?
Kevin W.
Applications Engineer
National Instruments

Having doubt on logical operators and,or .

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for