Help needed for PK_REV_COL unique constraint violation

We’re receiving a SNPW.PK_REV_COL unique constraint violation when trying to reverse a pipe delimited source file. There are no duplicate column names within the source file but the same column names are used across several different input files. Does anyone have a solution to this problem?

Hi,
This is a problem with the Reversed tables from ODI.
Go to work repository and truncate any "snp_rev...." tables.
That should solves it.
Cezar Santos
[www.odiexperts.com]
Edited by: Cezar Santos - www.odiexperts.com on 20/10/2009 15:34

Similar Messages

ORA-00001 Unique constraint Violation Error

We are upgrading our NW BW 7.01 java server to 7.3 and during the Downtime phase of the Installer, while running the Offline Migration, we are getting an error "EP-KM-BC: Unique Constraint Violation error: ORA-000001". Unknown Object# (12xxxxxx) does not exist. We have one CI and two DI. Any help would be greatly appreciated.

Hi Anil,
You need to clear the data from the table
1. SHD_AP_PROPVALUE
2. SHD_KMC_AP_PROP
3. SHD_AP_MC
Repeat the phase and also follow the sapnote
1873288 - RUN_OFFLINE_MIGRATION phase fails during SAP NetWeaver migration
Also paste the logs of RUN_OFFLINE_MIGRATION phase.
With Regards
Ashutosh Chaturvedi

Reattempt of insert after a ORA-0001 unique constraint violation

Hi,
I'm inserting into a table. The primary key on this table is made up of the user id and a one-up transaction number. Unfortunately, I cannot change the design of this table.
Because I have to query the table to get the next transaction number before I insert into the table, I sometimes get a ORA-0001 (unique constraint violation) error because some other session grabbed the next transaction number and committed before I did.
To deal with this I retry the insert, that is, read the table again for the next tran number and insert. I allow for this up to 3 times. If after the third attempt I fail again, I rollback.
I'm seeing 3 records in the table.
So here are my questions: Do I need to rollback when I get the ORA-0001 error? I thought I wouldn't have to. If I do, why? The insert failed, how could the commit statement commit 3 records?
Thanks!

No, the userid and transaction numbers are not the same (combined) for each of the 3 rows.
Here is the logic to retry again when I get a ORA-0001:
PROCEDURE insert_record(
table1_rec_in IN table1%ROWTYPE,
tran_number OUT table1.trans_number%TYPE,
attempt_number IN PLS_INTEGER)
IS
next_tran_number table1.trans_number%TYPE;
BEGIN
SELECT NVL(MAX(trans_number), 0) + 1
INTO next_tran_number
FROM table1
WHERE userid = table1_rec_in.table1_userid;
INSERT INTO table1
(userid,
trans_number,
amount,
transdate)
VALUES
(table1_rec_in.userid,
next_tran_number,
table1_rec_in.amount,
SYSDATE);
tran_number := next_tran_number;
EXCEPTION
WHEN DUP_VAL_ON_INDEX THEN
IF attempt_number < 3
THEN
DECLARE
next_attempt_number PLS_INTEGER;
BEGIN
next_attempt_number := attempt_number + 1;
insert_record(
table1_rec_in,
tran_number,
next_attempt_number);
END;
ELSE
RAISE unable_to_insert_rec;
END IF;
WHEN OTHERS THEN
RAISE unable_to_insert_rec;
END;
I'm using recursion to try the insert again. Is this the source of my problems? I don't see it and can't reproduce it.

Unique Constraint Violation on Merge

I'm getting a unique constraint violation on the following but I don't understand why. I know there are duplicates on remote.customer_id but I'm doing a distinct on that column but still the error. In my local table, customer_id is the primary key so it must be unique. If I remove the primary key constraint altogether, the error goes away.
Can anyone tell me why both DISTINCT and UNIQUE fail to eliminate duplicates in this merge statement? I have confirmed that remote.customer_id is the source of the duplicates.
merge into CUSTOMER c
using (
select DISTINCT remote.customer_id,
remote.name_1,
remote.name_2,
remote.name_3,
remote.name_4,
remote.house_number_and_street,
remote.city,
remote.region,
remote.country_code,
remote.postal_code,
p.customer_id_of_bus_partner
from D_CUSTOMER@BW_LINK remote
left join D_CUSTOMER_PARTNER_FUNCTIONS@BW_LINK p
on p.customer_id = remote.customer_id
where p.partner_function_id = 'ZS'
) remote
on (c.customer_id = remote.customer_id)
when matched then
update set c.name_1 = remote.name_1,
          c.name_2 = remote.name_2,
          c.name_3 = remote.name_3,
          c.name_4 = remote.name_4,
          c.house_number_and_street = remote.house_number_and_street,
          c.city = remote.city,
          c.region = remote.region,
          c.country_code = remote.country_code,
          c.postal_code = remote.postal_code
when not matched then
insert (c.customer_id,
               c.name_1,
               c.name_2,
               c.name_3,
               c.name_4,
               c.house_number_and_street,
               c.city,
               c.region,
               c.country_code,
               c.postal_code,
               c.customer_id_of_bus_partner
values (remote.customer_id,
               remote.name_1,
               remote.name_2,
               remote.name_3,
               remote.name_4,
               remote.house_number_and_street,
               remote.city,
               remote.region,
               remote.country_code,
               remote.postal_code,
               remote.customer_id_of_bus_partner
LOG ERRORS INTO DML_ERROR_LOG ('Customer Merge') REJECT LIMIT 5;
Edited by: bjiggs on Mar 25, 2010 10:56 AM

When you mentioned the following in previous post...
+unable to get a stable set of rows in the source tables+
...I suspected this :-)
This is EQUIVALENT to "Mutating Table trigger/function" error...
...in the sense that the the "target rows" which are
supposed to be changed (by this statement)
are FOUND/MATCHED in the "source result set" MULTIPLE TIMESThe main reason this error comes up is...
In the SOURCE result set, there are MORE than one ROW that MATCHED the TARGET result set.
In this scenario the row with PK=3 matches more than one SOURCE rows, which one is supposed to be used for updating?
Yes indeed, oracle is unable to get a stable set of rows in source tables.
However the PK=4 is not matched in the target result set, so the statement will attenpt to insert both rows resulting in UNIQUE contraint error.
This was the case with OP in this posts.
This can be seen in your example by commenting one of the rows in table S with PK=3.
sudhakar@ORCL>drop table D;
Table dropped.
sudhakar@ORCL>drop table S;
Table dropped.
sudhakar@ORCL>create table D ( pk number, a varchar2(10),
2 constraint d_pk primary key (pk));
Table created.
sudhakar@ORCL>
sudhakar@ORCL>insert into D values( 1, 'a');
1 row created.
sudhakar@ORCL>insert into D values( 2, 'a');
1 row created.
sudhakar@ORCL>insert into D values( 3, 'a');
1 row created.
sudhakar@ORCL>
sudhakar@ORCL>commit;
Commit complete.
sudhakar@ORCL>
sudhakar@ORCL>create table S ( pk number, a varchar2(10));
Table created.
sudhakar@ORCL>
sudhakar@ORCL>insert into S values( 1, 'b');
1 row created.
sudhakar@ORCL>insert into S values( 2, 'b');
1 row created.
sudhakar@ORCL>insert into S values( 3, 'b');
1 row created.
sudhakar@ORCL>--insert into S values( 3, 'b');
sudhakar@ORCL>insert into S values( 4, 's');
1 row created.
sudhakar@ORCL>insert into S values( 4, 't');
1 row created.
sudhakar@ORCL>
sudhakar@ORCL>commit;
Commit complete.
sudhakar@ORCL>
sudhakar@ORCL>
sudhakar@ORCL>merge into d
2 using s
3 on (d.pk = s.pk)
4 when matched then update
5 set d.a = s.a
6 when not matched then insert
7 (d.pk, d.a)
8 values (s.pk, s.a);
merge into d
ERROR at line 1:
ORA-00001: unique constraint (SUDHAKAR.D_PK) violated
sudhakar@ORCL>vr,
Sudhakar B.

Unique constraint violation on version enabled table

hi!
we're facing a strange problem with a version enabled table that has an unique constraint on one column. if we rename an object stored in the table (the name-attribute of the object is the one that has a unique constraint on the respective column) and rename it back to the old name again, we get an ORA-00001 unique constraint violation on the execution of an update trigger.
if the constraint is simply applied as before to the now version enabled table, I understand that this happens, but shouldn't workspace manager take care of something like that when a table with unique constraints is version enabled? (the documentation also says that) because taking versioning into account it's not that we try to insert another object with the same name, it's the same object at another point in time now getting back it's old name.
we somewhat assume that to be a pretty standard scenario when using versioned data.
is this some kind of bug or do we just miss something important here?
more information:
- versioning is enabled on all tables with VIEW_WO_OVERWRITE and no valid time support
- database version is 10.2.0.1.0
- wm installation output:
ALLOW_CAPTURE_EVENTS OFF
ALLOW_MULTI_PARENT_WORKSPACES OFF
ALLOW_NESTED_TABLE_COLUMNS OFF
CR_WORKSPACE_MODE OPTIMISTIC_LOCKING
FIRE_TRIGGERS_FOR_NONDML_EVENTS ON
NONCR_WORKSPACE_MODE OPTIMISTIC_LOCKING
NUMBER_OF_COMPRESS_BATCHES 50
OWM_VERSION 10.2.0.1.0
UNDO_SPACE UNLIMITED
USE_TIMESTAMP_TYPE_FOR_HISTORY ON
- all operations are done on LIVE workspace
any help is appreciated.
EDIT: we found out the following: the table we are talking about is the only table where the unique constraint is left. so there must have been a problem during version enabling. on another oracle installation we did everything the same way and the unique constraint wasn't left there, so everything works fine.
regards,
Andreas Schilling
Message was edited by:
aschilling

hi!
we're facing a strange problem with a version enabled table that has an unique constraint on one column. if we rename an object stored in the table (the name-attribute of the object is the one that has a unique constraint on the respective column) and rename it back to the old name again, we get an ORA-00001 unique constraint violation on the execution of an update trigger.
if the constraint is simply applied as before to the now version enabled table, I understand that this happens, but shouldn't workspace manager take care of something like that when a table with unique constraints is version enabled? (the documentation also says that) because taking versioning into account it's not that we try to insert another object with the same name, it's the same object at another point in time now getting back it's old name.
we somewhat assume that to be a pretty standard scenario when using versioned data.
is this some kind of bug or do we just miss something important here?
more information:
- versioning is enabled on all tables with VIEW_WO_OVERWRITE and no valid time support
- database version is 10.2.0.1.0
- wm installation output:
ALLOW_CAPTURE_EVENTS OFF
ALLOW_MULTI_PARENT_WORKSPACES OFF
ALLOW_NESTED_TABLE_COLUMNS OFF
CR_WORKSPACE_MODE OPTIMISTIC_LOCKING
FIRE_TRIGGERS_FOR_NONDML_EVENTS ON
NONCR_WORKSPACE_MODE OPTIMISTIC_LOCKING
NUMBER_OF_COMPRESS_BATCHES 50
OWM_VERSION 10.2.0.1.0
UNDO_SPACE UNLIMITED
USE_TIMESTAMP_TYPE_FOR_HISTORY ON
- all operations are done on LIVE workspace
any help is appreciated.
EDIT: we found out the following: the table we are talking about is the only table where the unique constraint is left. so there must have been a problem during version enabling. on another oracle installation we did everything the same way and the unique constraint wasn't left there, so everything works fine.
regards,
Andreas Schilling
Message was edited by:
aschilling

Unique constraint violation error

Hello All,
I have a procedure called - FHM_DASHBOARD_PROC which inserts the data into a table called FHM_DASHBOARD_F fetching records from several tables. However, for a particular type of record, that data is not being inserted because of the Unique constraint violation
the procedure is:
create or replace
PROCEDURE FHM_DASHBOARD_PROC AS
DB_METRICS_CNT1Z number;
--V_PODNAME varchar2(10);
V_KI_CODE_DB_STATSZ varchar2(50);
V_ERRORSTRING varchar2(100);
--CURSOR PODNAME_CUR IS SELECT PODNAME,SHORTNAME FROM CRMODDEV.POD_DATA WHERE PODSTATUS_ID=1 AND PODTYPE_ID=1 ORDER BY PODNAME;
-- DB STATS
BEGIN
-- OPEN PODNAME_CUR;
    --   LOOP
      --   FETCH PODNAME_CUR INTO V_PODNAME,V_POD_SHORTNAME ;
        -- EXIT WHEN PODNAME_CUR%NOTFOUND;
           BEGIN
                 SELECT COUNT(*) INTO DB_METRICS_CNT1Z FROM FHM_DB_METRICS_F A, FHM_DB_D B where A.DBNAME=B.DBNAME and PODNAME=V_PODNAME AND DB_DATE=TRUNC(SYSDATE-1);
                           DBMS_OUTPUT.PUT_LINE('DB_METRICS_CNT1Z :'|| DB_METRICS_CNT1Z);
                           IF DB_METRICS_CNT1Z >0 THEN
                    DBMS_OUTPUT.PUT_LINE('DB STATS');
                   INSERT INTO FHM_DASHBOARD_F(PODNAME,DASH_DATE,KI_CODE,KI_VALUE,KI_STATUS)
                      (SELECT PODNAME, DASH_DATE AS CU_DATE, KI.KI_CODE, NVL(PF.KI_VALUE,0),
                                                              CASE
                                                               WHEN PF.KI_VALUE = ki.warning_threshold then 2
                    when PF.KI_VALUE=0 then 0
                    ELSE 1
                    END AS ALERT_STATUS
                    FROM
                    (SELECT PODNAME,DB_DATE AS DASH_DATE,decode(a.stats_last_status,'SUCCEEDED',1,'FAILED',2,'STOPPED',2,NULL,0) KI_VALUE from
                    FHM_DB_METRICS_F a,fhm_db_d b where a.dbname=b.dbname and podname='XYZ' and db_date=TRUNC(SYSDATE-1) and dbtype='OLTP')PF,
                    FHM_KEY_INDICATOR_D KI where PF.PODNAME=KI.POD_NAME AND KI.TIER_CODE=3 AND KI.KI_NAME='DB_STATS'
                    AND (PF.PODNAME,TRUNC(PF.DASH_DATE),KI.KI_CODE) NOT IN (SELECT PODNAME,DASH_DATE,KI_CODE FROM FHM_DASHBOARD_F));
                             COMMIT;
                         ELSE
                                SELECT KI_CODE INTO V_KI_CODE_DB_STATSZ FROM FHM_KEY_INDICATOR_D WHERE POD_NAME=V_PODNAME AND KI_NAME='DB_STATS';
                                 DBMS_OUTPUT.PUT_LINE('V_KI_CODE_DB_STATSZ :'||V_KI_CODE_DB_STATSZ);
                                 INSERT INTO FHM_DASHBOARD_F(PODNAME,DASH_DATE,KI_CODE,KI_VALUE,KI_STATUS) VALUES(V_PODNAME,TRUNC(SYSDATE-1),V_KI_CODE_DB_STATSZ,0,0);
                                 COMMIT;
                         END IF;
     EXCEPTION
                        WHEN OTHERS THEN
                        V_ERRORSTRING :='INSERT INTO FHM_DASHBOARD_F_ERROR_LOG(POD_NAME,KI_NAME,ERRORNO,ERRORMESSAGE,DATETIME) VALUES
               ('''||V_PODNAME||''',''DB_STATS'','''||SQLCODE||''','''||SQLERRM||''',SYSDATE)';
               EXECUTE IMMEDIATE V_ERRORSTRING;
                        COMMIT;
          END;
      --END LOOP;
--CLOSE PODNAME_CUR;
END;
END FHM_DASHBOARD_PROC;and the table where the data is inserting is
CREATE TABLE "CRMODDEV"."FHM_DASHBOARD_F"
    "PODNAME" VARCHAR2(25 BYTE) NOT NULL ENABLE,
    "DASH_DATE" DATE,
    "KI_CODE"   NUMBER NOT NULL ENABLE,
    "KI_VALUE" NUMBER,
    "KI_STATUS" NUMBER,
    CONSTRAINT "FHM_DASHBOARD_F_DATE_PK" PRIMARY KEY ("DASH_DATE", "PODNAME", "KI_CODE") USING INDEX PCTFREE 10 INITRANS 2 MAXTRANS 255 NOLOGGING COMPUTE STATISTICS STORAGE(INITIAL 4194304 NEXT 1048576 MINEXTENTS 1 MAXEXTENTS 2147483645 PCTINCREASE 0 FREELISTS 1 FREELIST GROUPS 1 BUFFER_POOL DEFAULT) TABLESPACE "CRMODDEV_IDX" ENABLE,
    CONSTRAINT "FHM_DASHBOARD_F_KI_CODE_FK" FOREIGN KEY ("KI_CODE") REFERENCES "CRMODDEV"."FHM_KEY_INDICATOR_D" ("KI_CODE") ENABLE
PCTFREE 10 PCTUSED 40 INITRANS 1 MAXTRANS 255 NOCOMPRESS NOLOGGING STORAGE
    INITIAL 3145728 NEXT 1048576 MINEXTENTS 1 MAXEXTENTS 2147483645 PCTINCREASE 0 FREELISTS 1 FREELIST GROUPS 1 BUFFER_POOL DEFAULT
TABLESPACE "CRMODDEV_TBL" ENABLE ROW MOVEMENT ;the Primary key constraint is FHM_DASHBOARD_F_DATE_PK and is on 3 columns of the table DASH_DATE, PODNAME, KI_CODE
And this is the query used in the Procedure for inserting the data into the table
(SELECT PODNAME, DASH_DATE AS CU_DATE, KI.KI_CODE, NVL(PF.KI_VALUE,0),
                               CASE
                               WHEN PF.KI_VALUE = ki.warning_threshold then 2
when PF.KI_VALUE=0 then 0
ELSE 1
END AS ALERT_STATUS
From
(Select Podname,Db_Date As Dash_Date,Decode(A.Stats_Last_Status,'SUCCEEDED',1,'FAILED',2,'STOPPED',2,Null,0) Ki_Value From -- Added Distinct
FHM_DB_METRICS_F a,fhm_db_d b where a.dbname=b.dbname and podname in ('XYZ') and db_date = TRUNC(SYSDATE-2) and dbtype='OLTP')PF,
Fhm_Key_Indicator_D Ki Where Pf.Podname=Ki.Pod_Name And Ki.Tier_Code=3 And Ki.Ki_Name='DB_STATS'
And (Pf.Podname,Trunc(Pf.Dash_Date),Ki.Ki_Code) Not In (Select Podname,Dash_Date,Ki_Code From Fhm_Dashboard_F));It gives *2 record* as result
XYZ 20-JAN-12     2521     1     1
XYZ 20-JAN-12     2521     1     1
So it gives Unique constraint violation error while inserting. Then, I changed in the above inserting code by adding a distinct clause. After that the query gives only ONE record as result. However, that record also is not being inserted into the table and giving the same error.
Now the question is How shall I insert this record into the table successfully ?
Though the message is too long, However, I have given you the full structure of the object/procedure and error.
Thank You in Advance.

when you have 5 columns in the result set adding DISTINCT is n ot the solution as you may get the same error again.
Check the target table whether the data exists before inserting ..if not check the table structure for unique constraint created on other columns.
select *from <table_name>
where
DASH_DATE=date '2012-01-20'
and PODNAME='XYZ'
and KI_CODE=2521;

Unique constraint violation

Hi,
I am a newbie to oracle..
I have a composite primary key consisting of sequence,reg_no,srvc_code and srvc_type..
when i tried inserting a record through the application it is showing that Unique constraint violated..But i did not find the record in the table for the same values
and if I insert the same values with an sql insert statement,the record is inserted successfully..Please suggest me the possibilities of getting such an error.

952759 wrote:
Hi,
I am a newbie to oracle..
I have a composite primary key consisting of sequence,reg_no,srvc_code and srvc_type..
when i tried inserting a record through the application it is showing that Unique constraint violated..But i did not find the record in the table for the same values
and if I insert the same values with an sql insert statement,the record is inserted successfully..Please suggest me the possibilities of getting such an error.Either Oracle is mistaken or you are mistaken.
I'll give you 1000 to 1 odds that Oracle is correct & you are mistaken.
How can we reproduce what you report?
How do I ask a question on the forums?
SQL and PL/SQL FAQ

Uniqueness constraint violation: service

Hi;
I upgrade to bpel 3.1.3.5.0; and after i cannot create a web service proxy from bpel process ! i always had this error "uniqueness constraint violation: service "
Any ideas

WSDLs were supplied by third party managing the web service I am attempting to generate the proxies for. I'm unsure of the method used to create the WSDL files.

Help needed for writing query

help needed for writing query
i have the following tables(with data) as mentioned below
FK*-foregin key (SUBJECTS)
FK**-foregin key (COMBINATION)
1)SUBJECTS(table name)
SUB_ID(NUMBER) SUB_CODE(VARCHAR2) SUB_NAME (VARCHAR2)
2           02           Computer Science
3           03           Physics
4           04           Chemistry
5           05           Mathematics
7           07           Commerce
8           08           Computer Applications
9           09           Biology
2)COMBINATION
COMB_ID(NUMBER) COMB_NAME(VARCHAR2) SUB_ID1(NUMBER(FK*)) SUB_ID2(NUMBER(FK*)) SUB_ID3(NUMBER(FK*)) SUBJ_ID4(NUMBER(FK*))
383           S1      9           4           2           3
384           S2      4           2           5           3
---------I actually designed the ABOVE table also like this
3) a)COMBINATION
COMB_ID(NUMBER) COMB_NAME(VARCHAR2)
383           S1
384           S2
b)COMBINATION_DET
COMBDET_ID(NUMBER) COMB_ID(FK**) SUB_ID(FK*)
1               383          9
2               383          4
3               383          2
4               383          3
5               384          4
6               384          2
7               384          5
8               384          3
Business rule: a combination consists of a maximum of 4 subjects (must contain)
and the user is less relevant to a COMB_NAME(name of combinations) but user need
the subjects contained in combinations
i need the following output
COMB_ID COMB_NAME SUBJECT1 SUBJECT2      SUBJECT3      SUBJECT4
383     S1     Biology Chemistry      Computer Science Physics
384     S2     Chemistry Computer Science Mathematics Physics
or even this is enough(what i actually needed)
COMB_ID     subjects
383           Biology,Chemistry,Computer Science,Physics
384           Chemistry,Computer Science,Mathematics,Physics
you can use any of the COMBINATION table(either (2) or (3))
and i want to know
1)which design is good in this case
(i think SUB_ID1,SUB_ID2,SUB_ID3,SUB_ID4 is not a
good method to link with same table but if 4 subjects only(and must) comes
detail table is not neccessary )
now i am achieving the result by program-coding in C# after getting the rows from oracle
i am using oracle 9i (also ODP.NET)
i want to know how can i get the result in the stored procedure itsef.
2)how it could be designed in any other way.
any help/suggestion is welcome
thanks for your time --Pradeesh

Well I forgot the table-alias, here now with:
SELECT C.COMB_ID
, C.COMB_NAME
, (SELECT SUB_NAME
FROM SUBJECTS
WHERE SUB_ID = C.SUB_ID1) AS SUBJECT_NAME1
, (SELECT SUB_NAME
FROM SUBJECTS
WHERE SUB_ID = C.SUB_ID2) AS SUBJECT_NAME2
, (SELECT SUB_NAME
FROM SUBJECTS
WHERE SUB_ID = C.SUB_ID3) AS SUBJECT_NAME3
, (SELECT SUB_NAME
FROM SUBJECTS
WHERE SUB_ID = C.SUB_ID4) AS SUBJECT_NAME4
FROM COMBINATION C;
As you need exactly 4 subjects, the columns-solution is just fine I would say.

Color management help needed for adobe CS5 and Epson printer 1400-Prints coming out too dark with re

Color management help needed for adobe CS5 and Epson printer 1400-Prints coming out too dark with reddish cast and loss of detail
System: Windows 7
Adobe CS5
Printer: Epson Stylus Photo 1400
Paper: Inkjet matte presentation paper with slight luster
Installed latest patch for Adobe CS5
Epson driver up to date
After reading solutions online and trying them for my settings for 2 days I am still unable to print what I am seeing on my screen in Adobe CS5. I calibrated my monitor, but am not sure once calibration is saved if I somehow use this setting in Photoshop’s color management.
The files I am printing are photographs of dogs with lots of detail I digitally painted with my Wacom tablet in Photoshop CS5 and then printed with Epson Stylus 1400 on inkjet paper 20lb with slight luster.
My Printed images lose a lot of the detail & come out way to dark with a reddish cast and loss of detail when I used these settings in the printing window:
Color Handling: Photoshop manages color, Color management -ICM, OFF no color adjustment.
When I change to these settings in printer window: Color Handling: Printer manages color. Color management- Color Controls, 1.8 Gamma and choose Epson Standard it prints lighter, but with reddish cast and very little detail and this is the best setting I have used so far.
Based on what I have read on line, I think the issue is mainly to do with what controls are set in the Photoshop Color Settings window and the Epson Printer preferences. I have screen images attached of these windows and would appreciate knowing what you recommend I enter for each choice.
Also I am confused as to what ICM color management system to use with this printer and CS5:
What is the best ICM to use with PS CS5 & the Epson 1400 printer? Should I use the same ICM for both?
Do I embed the ICM I choose into the new files I create?
Do I view all files in the CS5 workspace in this default ICM?
Do I set my monitor setting to the same ICM?
If new file opens in CS5 workspace and it has a different embedded profile than my workspace, do I convert it?
Do I set my printer, Monitor and PS CS5 color settings to the same ICM?
Is using the same ICM for all devices what is called a consistent workflow?
I appreciate any and all advice that can be sent my way on this complicated issue. Thank you in advance for your time and kind help.

It may be possible to figure out by watching a Dr.Brown video on the subject of color printing. Adobe tv
I hope this may help...............

File missing (file\BCD error code 0Xc0000034 help need for work!

file missing (file\BCD error code 0Xc0000034 help need for work! what can i do?
have an p 2000 notebook pc

Hi bobkunkle, welcome to the HP Forums. I understand you cannot boot passed the error you are receiving.
What is the model or product number of your notebook? What version of Windows is installed?
Guide to finding your product number
Which Windows operating system am I running?
TwoPointOh
I work on behalf of HP
Please click “Accept as Solution ” if you feel my post solved your issue, it will help others find the solution.
Click the “Kudos, Thumbs Up" on the bottom to say “Thanks” for helping!

Regarding ORA-00001: unique constraint violation error

Hi ,
This is Venkat. I am new to OWB.
When I run the mapping I am getting the ORA-00001: unique constraint violation error.
My loading type is Update/Insert.
My target table Primarykey is combination of 3 keys.
Please give me the suggestions. It is very urgent.
Thanks,
Venkat

1) If you can disable/drop the indexes on the table, you can load the data and then do a SQL query grouping by the PK/UI to show which rows have a count > 1 i.e. the duplicates.
2) If you can't alter the target table, perhaps create a dummy copy of the table without pk/indexes and load to that and then do above query.
3) Run the mapping via the debugger and set a breakpoint just before your target table and examine the data to see if you can spot the duplicates.
4) Put a deduplicator into the mapping (just before target table), this may allow you to load data but doesn't solve the real problem as to why you have duplicates.
Si

Help need for force to signout All session ! how...

hi
help need for force to signout All session ! how ??
Solved!
Go to Solution.

Hi and welcome to the Skype Community,
To force a signout of all instances your Skype is signed into please change your password: https://support.skype.com/en/faq/FA95/how-do-i-change-my-password
Follow the latest Skype Community News
↓ Did my reply answer your question? Accept it as a solution to help others, Thanks. ↓

OWB 10.2.0.4.36: Unique Constraint Violation on WB_RT_SERVICE_QUEUE_TAB.

Hello.
I'm using OWB 10.2.0.4.36. I've recently started to get an error on a mapping that has been scheduled and running successfully for several years now. The details are below. This only occurs on one specific mapping. I've synchronized my metadata in OWB and also redeployed the mapping and the associated source/target objects. Still the issue occurs.
I'm looking for help in troubleshooting the error and preventing it from happening again. I've taken a look at the packages, but they are OWB packages and I'm not really going to touch those for fear of bringing down my entire system.
I haven't really found any suggestions via Google, the forum or Metalink.
Any thoughts?
Thanks.
Dan
Connected to:
Oracle Database 10g Enterprise Edition Release 10.2.0.4.0 - 64bit Production With the Partitioning, OLAP, Data Mining and Real Application Testing options
Session altered.
Role set.
Stage 1: Decoding Parameters
| location_name=ATLAS_STAGING_PROD
| task_type=PLSQL
| task_name=M_BSO_COMPANY_STG_FULL
Stage 2: Opening Task
| l_audit_execution_id=2509772
Stage 3: Overriding Parameters
Stage 4: Executing Task
begin
ERROR at line 1:
ORA-00604: error occurred at recursive SQL level 1
ORA-00001: unique constraint (DW_REPOS.SYS_C005805) violated
ORA-06512: at "DW_REPOS.WB_RTI_QUEUES", line 202
ORA-06512: at "DW_REPOS.WB_RTI_SERVICE_EXECUTION", line 500
ORA-06512: at "DW_REPOS.WB_RTI_SERVICE_EXECUTION", line 558
ORA-06512: at "DW_REPOS.WB_RT_EXECUTION_CONTROL", line 13
ORA-06512: at "DW_REPOS.WB_RT_API_EXEC", line 365
ORA-06512: at "DW_REPOS.WB_RT_API_EXEC", line 726
ORA-06512: at line 10
Disconnected from Oracle Database 10g Enterprise Edition Release 10.2.0.4.0 - 64bit Production With the Partitioning, OLAP, Data Mining and Real Application Testing options.

I am also having same problem and my environment is
Environment: Oracle 9.2.0.3, OWB 10g, workflow 2.6.2, sun solaris 2.8 - 64 bits. Does installing/upgrading OWF 2.6.2 to 2.6.3 solve the problem and does it have any ripple effect on the system if you upgrade the OWF from 2.6.2 to 2.6.3? Please help.....

Query help needed for querybuilder to use with lcm cli

Hi,
I had set up several queries to run with the lcm cli in order to back up personal folders, inboxes, etc. to lcmbiar files to use as backups. I have seen a few posts that are similar, but I have a specific question/concern.
I just recently had to reference one of these back ups only to find it was incomplete. Does the query used by the lcm cli also only pull the first 1000 rows? Is there a way to change this limit somwhere?
Also, since when importing this lcmbiar file for something 'generic' like 'all personal folders', pulls in WAY too much stuff, is there a better way to limit this? I am open to suggestions, but it would almost be better if I could create individual lcmbiar output files on a per user basis. This way, when/if I need to restore someone's personal folder contents, for example, I could find them by username and import just that lcmbiar file, as opposed to all 3000 of our users. I am not quite sure how to accomplish this...
Currently, with my limited windows scripting knowledge, I have set up a bat script to run each morning, that creates a 'runtime' properties file from a template, such that the lcmbiar file gets named uniquely for that day and its content. Then I call the lcm_cli using the proper command. The query within the properties file is currently very straightforward - select * from CI_INFOOBJECTS WHERE SI_ANCESTOR = 18.
To do what I want to do...
1) I'd first need a current list of usernames in a text file, that could be read (?) in and parsed to single out each user (remember we are talking about 3000) - not sure the best way to get this.
2) Then instead of just updating the the lcmbiar file name with a unique name as I do currently, I would also update the query (which would be different altogether): SELECT * from CI_INFOOBJECTS where SI_OWNER = '<username>' AND SI_ANCESTOR = 18.
In theory, that would grab everything owned by that user in their personal folder - right? and write it to its own lcmbiar file to a location I specify.
I just think chunking something like this is more effective and BO has no built in back up capability that already does this. We are on BO 4.0 SP7 right now, move to 4.1 SP4 over the summer.
Any thoughts on this would be much appreciated.
thanks,
Missy

Just wanted to pass along that SAP Support pointed me to KBA 1969259 which had some good example queries in it (they were helping me with a concern I had over the lcmbiar file output, not with query design). I was able to tweak one of the sample queries in this KBA to give me more of what I was after...
SELECT TOP 10000 static, relationships, SI_PARENT_FOLDER_CUID, SI_OWNER, SI_PATH FROM CI_INFOOBJECTS,CI_APPOBJECTS,CI_SYSTEMOBJECTS WHERE (DESCENDENTS ("si_name='Folder Hierarchy'","si_name='<username>'"))
This exports inboxes, personal folders, categories, and roles, which is more than I was after, but still necessary to back up.. so in a way, it is actually better because I have one lcmbiar file per user - contains all their 'personal' objects.
So between narrowing down my set of users to only those who actually have saved things to their personal folder and now having a query that actually returns what I expect it to return, along with the help below for a job to clean up these excessive amounts of promotion jobs I am now creating... I am all set!
Hopefully this can help someone else too!
Thanks,
missy

Help needed for PK_REV_COL unique constraint violation

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for