How to reduce the fetch time of this sql?
Here is the SQL, three-table join and joining conditions are:
ms_ets_cntrl.ims_cntrt_oid=ims_alctn.ims_alctn_oid
ims_alctn.ims_trde_oid=ims_trde.ims_trde_oid
SELECT 'MCH' Type, ims_ets_cntrl.STTS tp_stts, count(*) Count FROM ims_ets_cntrl where ims_ets_cntrl.ims_cntrt_oid in
(select ims_alctn.ims_alctn_oid FROM ims_alctn, ( select ims_trde.ims_trde_oid from ims_trde
where ( IMS_TRDE.IMS_TRDE_RCPT_DTTM >= TO_DATE('10/29/2009 00:00', 'MM/DD/YYYY HH24:MI') AND IMS_TRDE.IMS_TRDE_RCPT_DTTM <= (TO_DATE('11/5/2009 23:59', 'MM/DD/YYYY HH24:MI')) )
AND (IMS_TRDE.GRS_TRX_TYPE IN ('INJECTION','WITHDRAWAL','PAYMENT') OR IMS_TRDE.SSC_INVST_TYPE = 'FC' AND 1=1 and IMS_TRDE.SERVICE_TYPE='FS' )) TRDE
where IMS_ALCTN.IMS_TRDE_OID=TRDE.IMS_TRDE_OID) and ims_ets_cntrl.outbnd_dest = 'ETD' group by ims_ets_cntrl.STTSOptimizer and related parameter info:
SQL> show parameter optimizer
NAME TYPE VALUE
optimizer_dynamic_sampling integer 1
optimizer_features_enable string 9.2.0
optimizer_index_caching integer 0
optimizer_index_cost_adj integer 100
optimizer_max_permutations integer 2000
optimizer_mode string CHOOSE
SQL>select pname, pval1, pval2 from sys.aux_stats$ where sname='SYSSTATS_INFO';
DSTART 11-16-2009 10:23
DSTOP 11-16-2009 10:23
FLAGS 1
STATUS NOWORKLOADHere is autotrace output:
Execution Plan
0 SELECT STATEMENT Optimizer=CHOOSE
1 0 SORT (GROUP BY)
2 1 VIEW
3 2 SORT (UNIQUE)
4 3 TABLE ACCESS (BY INDEX ROWID) OF 'IMS_ETS_CNTRL'
5 4 NESTED LOOPS
6 5 NESTED LOOPS
7 6 TABLE ACCESS (BY INDEX ROWID) OF 'IMS_TRDE'
8 7 INDEX (RANGE SCAN) OF 'IMS_TRDE_INDX4' (NON- UNIQUE)
9 6 TABLE ACCESS (BY INDEX ROWID) OF 'IMS_ALCTN'
10 9 INDEX (RANGE SCAN) OF 'IMS_ALCTN_INDX1' (NON -UNIQUE)
11 5 INDEX (RANGE SCAN) OF 'IMS_ETS_CNTRL_INDX1' (NON -UNIQUE)
Statistics
0 recursive calls
0 db block gets
244608 consistent gets
58856 physical reads
0 redo size
497 bytes sent via SQL*Net to client
499 bytes received via SQL*Net from client
2 SQL*Net roundtrips to/from client
2 sorts (memory)
0 sorts (disk)
1 rows processedHere is TKPROF output:
call count cpu elapsed disk query current rows
Parse 1 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 0
Execute 1 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 0
Fetch 2 4.85 129.72 53863 244608 0 1
total 4 4.85 129.72 53863 244608 0 1
Misses in library cache during parse: 1
Optimizer goal: CHOOSE
Parsing user id: 63
Rows Row Source Operation
1 SORT GROUP BY
12972 VIEW
12972 SORT UNIQUE
12972 TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID IMS_ETS_CNTRL
46236 NESTED LOOPS
19134 NESTED LOOPS
19744 TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID IMS_TRDE
176922 INDEX RANGE SCAN IMS_TRDE_INDX4 (object id 34099)
19134 TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID IMS_ALCTN
19134 INDEX RANGE SCAN IMS_ALCTN_INDX1 (object id 34094)
27101 INDEX RANGE SCAN IMS_ETS_CNTRL_INDX1 (object id 34101)
********************************************************************************Explain plan output:
PLAN_TABLE_OUTPUT
| Id | Operation | Name | Rows | Bytes | Cost |
| 0 | SELECT STATEMENT | | | | |
| 1 | SORT GROUP BY | | | | |
| 2 | VIEW | | | | |
| 3 | SORT UNIQUE | | | | |
|* 4 | TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID | IMS_ETS_CNTRL | | | |
| 5 | NESTED LOOPS | | | | |
| 6 | NESTED LOOPS | | | | |
|* 7 | TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID| IMS_TRDE | | | |
|* 8 | INDEX RANGE SCAN | IMS_TRDE_INDX4 | | | |
| 9 | TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID| IMS_ALCTN | | | |
|* 10 | INDEX RANGE SCAN | IMS_ALCTN_INDX1 | | | |
|* 11 | INDEX RANGE SCAN | IMS_ETS_CNTRL_INDX1 | | | |
Predicate Information (identified by operation id):
4 - filter("IMS_ETS_CNTRL"."OUTBND_DEST"='ETD')
7 - filter("IMS_TRDE"."GRS_TRX_TYPE"='INJECTION' OR "IMS_TRDE"."GRS_TRX_TYPE"='WITHD
RAWAL' OR "IMS_TRDE"."GRS_TRX_TYPE"='PAYMENT' OR "IMS_TRDE"."SSC_INVST_TY
PE"='FC' AND "IMS_TRDE"."SERVICE_TYPE"='FS')
8 - access("IMS_TRDE"."IMS_TRDE_RCPT_DTTM">=TO_DATE('2009-10-29 00:00:00', 'yyyy-mm-
dd hh24:mi:ss') AND "IMS_TRDE"."IMS_TRDE_RCPT_DTTM"<=TO_DATE('2009-11-05
23:59:00', 'yyyy-mm-dd hh24:mi:ss')
10 - access("IMS_ALCTN"."IMS_TRDE_OID"="IMS_TRDE"."IMS_TRDE_OID")
11 - access("IMS_ETS_CNTRL"."IMS_CNTRT_OID"="IMS_ALCTN"."IMS_ALCTN_OID")
Note: rule based optimizationCould you please help tune this sql?
How can I reduce the elapsed time? How can I reduce query read?
If there is any other info that you need, please let me know!
thank you very much!
What exactly is this logic meant to do?
AND (ims_trde.grs_trx_type IN ('INJECTION', 'WITHDRAWAL', 'PAYMENT')
OR ims_trde.ssc_invst_type = 'FC'
AND ims_trde.service_type = 'FS')is that really:
AND (ims_trde.grs_trx_type IN ('INJECTION', 'WITHDRAWAL', 'PAYMENT')
OR ims_trde.ssc_invst_type = 'FC')
AND ims_trde.service_type = 'FS'or is it maybe:
AND (ims_trde.grs_trx_type IN ('INJECTION', 'WITHDRAWAL', 'PAYMENT')
OR (ims_trde.ssc_invst_type = 'FC'
AND ims_trde.service_type = 'FS'))?
Similar Messages
-
How to reduce the elapsed time on this query.
Oracle10.2.0.5 on AIX6.1.
Here is the awrsql report of a query for a one hour window.
Here UNBILLED has 120million records which is partitioned and subpartitioned. It has 10 partitions and 312 subpartitions. One subpartition has 10M records, 10 others have 1M each and 270 subpartitions have 360K records each. And 31 subpartitions are empty.
And BILLED has 300K records.
Looking at report you can see that out of 984 seconds, 958 is used for IO. Machine is PowerPC_POWER5 with 8CPU and disk storage on EMC.
Stat Name Statement Per Execution % Snap
Elapsed Time (ms) 984,327 5,561.2 28.6
CPU Time (ms) 40,760 230.3 29.8
Executions 177 N/A N/A
Buffer Gets 1,923,456 10,867.0 46.9
Disk Reads 203,832 1,151.6 25.1
Parse Calls 0 0.0 0.0
Rows 106,200 600.0 N/A
User I/O Wait Time (ms) 958,766 N/A N/A
Cluster Wait Time (ms) 0 N/A N/A
Application Wait Time (ms) 0 N/A N/A
Concurrency Wait Time (ms) 0 N/A N/A
Invalidations 0 N/A N/A
Version Count 1 N/A N/A
Sharable Mem(KB) 31 N/A N/A
SQL_ID akg45a750sh0u
DELETE UNBILLED WHERE (MSG_ID, MSG_ID2,SPLIT_ROW_NUM) IN (SELECT MSG_ID,MSG_ID2, SPLIT_ROW_NUM FROM BILLED
WHERE BILL_REF_NO = :B2 AND BILL_REF_RESETS = :B1 )
Plan hash value: 3879210699
| Id | Operation | Name | Rows | Bytes | Cost (%CPU)| Pstart| Pstop |
| 0 | DELETE STATEMENT | | | | 1 (100)| | |
| 1 | DELETE | UNBILLED | | | | | |
| 2 | NESTED LOOPS | | 1 | 112 | 0 (0)| | |
| 3 | TABLE ACCESS BY GLOBAL INDEX ROWID| BILLED | 1 | 65 | 0 (0)| 1 | 1 |
| 4 | INDEX RANGE SCAN | BILLED_XCB_BILL_REF_TRANS | 1 | | 0 (0)| | |
| 5 | INDEX UNIQUE SCAN | UNBILLED_PK | 1 | 47 | 0 (0)| | |
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Is there way to improve the elapsed time( currently 5,561.2 msec per execution) of the query?
Thanks for your time...user1014212 wrote:
You're giving very interresting pointers.. Especially the one using the GTT table... Thanks...
I was also looking from a DBA point of view, say increasing the DB_CACHE_SIZE from 5GB to 8GB as the machine has almost 32GB memory out of which 13GB is free memory. Because the timed event is "db file sequential read" which takes 95% of Total Call time.
select * from V_$SGA_TARGET_ADVICE;
post SQL & FORMATTED results using tags -
How to reduce the Logout time in IDM
Hi Everyone,
Help me in Solving the issue.
When i click on the logout button of the end user interface in sun idm, it is taking 20 secs to come back to the login page (login.jsp) which is causing very much delay in the process. I want to reduce this time. Dont know exactly what is the backend process.
Kindly help me if you know any solution for the same.
Thank you in advance.Srikanth,
It would be better to use a database table(s) to store your audit trail information than an xml file, which could grow beyond a manageable size and then require housekeeping efforts and file rolling, etc. It would also be much easier to query user related information out of the logs, pareto charts for failed vs. successful login attempts, etc. if the data was stored in a database.
Have you considered modifying the Relogin.jsp page link in the portal's sub-menu bar? How about making your own version of this web page and changing the link pointer? Keep in mind that whatever result you come up with here will need a significant update for NetWeaver UME compatibility in version 12.0.
Regards,
Jeremy -
How to reduce the cloning time if using cold backup?
Hi,
We are using EBS r12 (12.0.6) with database 10.2.0.3 in Linux Redhat 4 32-bit envoirnment.
Our datbase size is around 480 GB and we are facing the issues to provide the clone to my consultants for meet the target timelines in given time.
(Source:)---- Production Dell R900 Server machine having 32-GB RAM and 8 Quard Core CPU's.
(Target:)---- Clone Dell 2950 Server machine having 16-GB RAM and 4-Quard Core CPU's.
Currectly we are taking cold backup like:
1: Auto shutdown EBS r12 database nighthy at 12:00 AM daily and compress the backup using tar utility in linux. This process takes 6:00 hours aprox:
2: After that we move compressed file to clone machine and then uncompressed it, and this process takes 5:00 hours aprox.
3: And performe standard cloning steps.
Questions:
1: How to reduce time of this backup process?
3: Is there any other way to reduce the cloning process.
2: What type of backup oracle recommended to their customers for this type of process?
Thanks.1: How to reduce time of this backup process?Without using third party tools, it might be hard to tune the timing of compressing/uncompressing the file.
Have you tried to use scp command? This would help if your network throughput is acceptable.
3: Is there any other way to reduce the cloning process.Since the main issue you have with the copy, then you might copy the files remotely from the source to the target, or using any other storage/backup tools (like file system snapshot).
2: What type of backup oracle recommended to their customers for this type of process?Oracle does not recommend any type of backup as the tools used are not Oracle products.
Thanks,
Hussein -
How to reduce the open time of Ms proejct 2010 plans which are taking 6 minutes to open.
In our company there is many plans which are uploaded in Project server 2010.
all linking to each other and in master plan all also link with master project.
when we open any project plan in Ms Project 2010 then it is taking 5 to 7 minutes time.
I dont know why . it's too much time.Is this issue specific to one master project? Do you have MS recommended db maintenance plan in place. Try updating database statics by executing SP_updatestats on all 4 project databases
Hrishi Deshpande Senior Consultant -
Reduce the execution time of catproc.sql
how can i reduce the time of execution of catproc.sql, I have increased the size of redo log files from 5m to 40m, but still performance hasn't improved much,
any suggestion
regards
asifIs it still running? Almost half an hour now.
By the time we find a solution maybe it's already done :)
I don't think you could do much after it's already started. As long as it's not hung, it will finish sooner or later. Make sure there are no other applications runing on the server to compete CPU and diskio with oracle. -
Oracle 10g: How to reduce the select * time
Hello,
We have 10 million entries in our database (Oracle 10g in windows 32 bit machine.)
The execution of 'select * ....' takes 3 to 4 hour. Is there any way to reduce this time.
Is any tool available which can read the oracle export data and produce the output in text file format.
or any idea ?
Thanks
With Regards
Hemant.hem_kec wrote:
Hello EdStevens
Is that 3 to 4 hours scrolling data past your screen?Answer: The Oracle is taking 3-4 hr to produce the output.
OK, let me try again. Where is the output being directed? To the screen? To a file?
The reason I ask is that often people will say "It takes n minutes to run this query" when in fact Oracle is producing the result set in a few seconds and what is taking n minutes is to run the results past the screen.
You should take a statspack report while the query is running and see where it is spending its time.
>
That's a different problem. I assume by "export data" you mean a .dmp file created by exp or expdp? If so what do you hope to achieve by outputting it in text format? What is the business problem to be solved?Answer: Since customer want to read all 10 milion entries. so we are think if we can dump (Oracle export) the data and using some tool (not Oracle) to read the data so there is no wait for the customer.As stated, a dmp file is oracle proprietary binary file that exists solely to transport data across platforms/versions. It is not suitable for your purpose. You are far better off finding where the current query is spending its time than looking for some kludge. 10 million rows of data is still 10 million rows of data. Do you think extracting it from the db, storeing it in some other format, and having some other tool read it off of disk in that format is going to be faster than simply selecting it from the db -- asking the db to do what it was designed to do?
>
>
Thanks
With Regards
Hemant. -
Hi All ,
In Case of reading huge amount of record from BPC Cube from BADI code , performing calculations and writing back huge amount of data into the cube , It takes lot of time . If there is any suggestion to read the data from Cube or writing data into the cube using some Parallel Processing methods , Then Please suggest .
Regards,
SHUBHAMHi Gersh ,
If we have a specific server say 10.10.10.10 (abc.co.in) on which we are working, Then under RZ12 we make the following entry as :
LOGON GROUP INSTANCE
parallel_generators abc.co.in_10 ( Lets assume : The instance number is 10 )
Now in SM59 under ABAP Connections , I am giving the following technical settings:
TARGET HOST abc.co.in
IP address 10.10.10.10
Instance number 10
Now if we have a scenario of load balancing servers with following server details (with all servers on different instance numbers ) :
10.10.10.11
10.10.10.13
10.1010.10
10.10.10.15
In this case how can we make the RZ12 settings and SM59 settings such that we don't have to hardcode any IP Address.
If the request is redirected to 10.10.10.11 and not to 10.10.10.10 , in that case how will the settings be.
I have raised this question on the below thread :
How to configure RZ12 and SM59 ABAP connection settings when we have work with Load Balancing servers rather than a specific server .
Regards,
SHUBHAM -
How to improve the run time of this query
Is there any way to improve this query,
I have a table which SR_WId with atleast one subtype as 'Break Fix', 'Break/Fix','Break Fix/Corrective Maint','Break Fix-Corrective Maint'. then i can have other subtype as 'Break Fix', 'Break/Fix', 'Follow Up', 'Follw-Up','T&'||'M Break Fix','Break Fix/Corrective Maint','Break Fix-Corrective Maint'.
Let me know if this is okay or to modify it.
SELECT DISTINCT A.SR_WID AS SR_WID
FROM WC_SR_ACT_SMRY_FS A
WHERE EXISTS
(SELECT NULL FROM WC_SR_ACT_SMRY_FS B
WHERE B.ACT_TYPE = 'Maintenance'
AND B.ACT_SUBTYPE in ('Break Fix', 'Break/Fix','Break Fix/Corrective Maint','Break Fix-Corrective Maint') AND B.NBR_OF_ACTIVITIES = 1 AND B.SR_WID = A.SR_WID
GROUP BY B.SR_WID
HAVING COUNT(B.SR_WID) >= 1)
AND A.ACT_TYPE = 'Maintenance'
AND A.ACT_SUBTYPE IN ('Break Fix', 'Break/Fix', 'Follow Up', 'Follw-Up','T&'||'M Break Fix','Break Fix/Corrective Maint','Break Fix-Corrective Maint')SELECT DISTINCT A.SR_WID AS SR_WID
FROM WC_SR_ACT_SMRY_FS A
WHERE EXISTS(
SELECT NULL
FROM WC_SR_ACT_SMRY_FS B
WHERE B.ACT_TYPE = 'Maintenance'
AND B.ACT_SUBTYPE IN
('Break Fix',
'Break/Fix',
'Break Fix/Corrective Maint',
'Break Fix-Corrective Maint')
AND B.NBR_OF_ACTIVITIES = 1
AND B.SR_WID = A.SR_WID
GROUP BY B.SR_WID
HAVING COUNT(B.SR_WID) >= 1 )
AND A.ACT_TYPE = 'Maintenance'
AND A.ACT_SUBTYPE IN
('Break Fix',
'Break/Fix',
'Follow Up',
'Follw-Up',
'T&' || 'M Break Fix',
'Break Fix/Corrective Maint',
'Break Fix-Corrective Maint');First of all, you can omit the GROUP BY and HAVING part in the sub-select -
we already know thath the only value for B.SR_WID can be A.SR_WID and
COUNT(B.SR_WID) will always be at least 1, otherwise the sub-select will
return nothing.
As a second step, you could transform EXISTS() into IN():
SELECT DISTINCT SR_WID
FROM WC_SR_ACT_SMRY_FS A
WHERE SR_WID IN(
SELECT B.SR_WID
FROM WC_SR_ACT_SMRY_FS B
WHERE B.ACT_TYPE = 'Maintenance'
AND B.ACT_SUBTYPE IN
('Break Fix',
'Break/Fix',
'Break Fix/Corrective Maint',
'Break Fix-Corrective Maint')
AND B.NBR_OF_ACTIVITIES = 1)
AND ACT_TYPE = 'Maintenance'
AND ACT_SUBTYPE IN
('Break Fix',
'Break/Fix',
'Follow Up',
'Follw-Up',
'T&' || 'M Break Fix',
'Break Fix/Corrective Maint',
'Break Fix-Corrective Maint'); -
How to reduce the query fetch from TKPROF output?
Hi,
Below is my query contains the TKPROF output.Here fetch is too high. How to reduce the fetch from here. And please check the explain plan is good or not?
SELECT czci.config_hdr_id,
czci.config_rev_nbr,
asoqla.quantity,
(SELECT
node_desc.LOCALIZED_STR
FROM CZ_LOCALIZED_TEXTS node_desc,
CZ_PS_NODES ps_nodes,
CZ_CONFIG_ITEMS czci1
WHERE czci1.config_hdr_id = asoqld.config_header_id
AND czci1.config_rev_nbr = asoqld.config_revision_num
AND node_desc.INTL_TEXT_ID = ps_nodes.INTL_TEXT_ID
AND NVL(node_desc.LANGUAGE,userenv('LANG')) = userenv('LANG')
AND czci1.PS_NODE_ID = ps_nodes.PERSISTENT_NODE_ID
AND ps_nodes.DEVL_PROJECT_ID = (SELECT MAX(DEVL_PROJECT_ID) FROM CZ_DEVL_PROJECTS WHERE NAME LIKE 'Control Model')
AND czci1.PARENT_CONFIG_ITEM_ID IN (SELECT sub_sub.CONFIG_ITEM_ID FROM CZ_CONFIG_ITEMS sub_sub
WHERE sub_sub.CONFIG_HDR_ID = asoqld.config_header_id
AND sub_sub.CONFIG_REV_NBR = asoqld.config_revision_num
AND sub_sub.PS_NODE_NAME = 'fittings')) fitting_material,
(SELECT
node_desc.LOCALIZED_STR
FROM CZ_LOCALIZED_TEXTS node_desc,
CZ_PS_NODES ps_nodes,
CZ_CONFIG_ITEMS czci
WHERE czci.config_hdr_id = asoqld.config_header_id
AND czci.config_rev_nbr = asoqld.config_revision_num
AND node_desc.INTL_TEXT_ID = ps_nodes.INTL_TEXT_ID
AND NVL(node_desc.LANGUAGE,userenv('LANG')) = userenv('LANG')
AND czci.PS_NODE_ID = ps_nodes.PERSISTENT_NODE_ID
AND ps_nodes.DEVL_PROJECT_ID = (SELECT MAX(DEVL_PROJECT_ID) FROM CZ_DEVL_PROJECTS WHERE NAME LIKE 'Control Model')
AND czci.PARENT_CONFIG_ITEM_ID IN (SELECT sub_sub.CONFIG_ITEM_ID FROM CZ_CONFIG_ITEMS sub_sub
WHERE sub_sub.CONFIG_HDR_ID = czci.CONFIG_HDR_ID
AND sub_sub.CONFIG_REV_NBR = czci.CONFIG_REV_NBR
AND sub_sub.PS_NODE_NAME = 'tubing')) tubing_material
FROM aso_quote_lines_all asoqla,
aso_quote_line_details asoqld,
cz_config_items czci
WHERE asoqla.quote_header_id = 55774
AND asoqla.item_type_code = 'MDL'
--AND asoqla.org_id = 2763
AND asoqla.quote_line_id = asoqld.quote_line_id
AND asoqld.config_header_id = czci.config_hdr_id
AND asoqld.config_revision_num = czci.config_rev_nbr
AND czci.ps_node_name = 'CONTROL MASTER ASLY'
call count cpu elapsed disk query current rows
Parse 1 0.04 0.03 0 0 0 0
Execute 1 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 0
Fetch 3 0.09 0.08 0 5100 0 19
total 5 0.13 0.12 0 5100 0 19
Misses in library cache during parse: 1
Optimizer goal: ALL_ROWS
Parsing user id: 173 (APPS)
Rows Row Source Operation
3 TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID CZ_LOCALIZED_TEXTS (cr=2161 pr=0 pw=0 time=32425 us)
40 NESTED LOOPS (cr=2158 pr=0 pw=0 time=32276 us)
3 NESTED LOOPS (cr=2147 pr=0 pw=0 time=32156 us)
3 NESTED LOOPS (cr=925 pr=0 pw=0 time=15885 us)
3 TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID CZ_CONFIG_ITEMS (cr=665 pr=0 pw=0 time=13456 us)
5490 INDEX RANGE SCAN CZ_CONFIG_ITEMS_PK (cr=96 pr=0 pw=0 time=1237 us)(object id 3049621)
3 TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID CZ_CONFIG_ITEMS (cr=260 pr=0 pw=0 time=2401 us)
1094 INDEX RANGE SCAN CZ_CONFIG_ITEMS_PK (cr=19 pr=0 pw=0 time=250 us)(object id 3049621)
3 TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID CZ_PS_NODES (cr=1222 pr=0 pw=0 time=16249 us)
3 INDEX RANGE SCAN CZ_PS_NODES_N12 (cr=1219 pr=0 pw=0 time=16211 us)(object id 750095)
1 SORT AGGREGATE (cr=1211 pr=0 pw=0 time=16125 us)
209 TABLE ACCESS FULL CZ_DEVL_PROJECTS (cr=1211 pr=0 pw=0 time=15883 us)
18 INDEX RANGE SCAN CZ_LOCALIZED_TEXTS_N1 (cr=11 pr=0 pw=0 time=68 us)(object id 31504)
3 TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID CZ_LOCALIZED_TEXTS (cr=2161 pr=0 pw=0 time=31499 us)
40 NESTED LOOPS (cr=2158 pr=0 pw=0 time=31351 us)
3 NESTED LOOPS (cr=2147 pr=0 pw=0 time=31215 us)
3 NESTED LOOPS (cr=925 pr=0 pw=0 time=15271 us)
3 TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID CZ_CONFIG_ITEMS (cr=665 pr=0 pw=0 time=12441 us)
5490 INDEX RANGE SCAN CZ_CONFIG_ITEMS_PK (cr=96 pr=0 pw=0 time=1230 us)(object id 3049621)
3 TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID CZ_CONFIG_ITEMS (cr=260 pr=0 pw=0 time=2795 us)
1094 INDEX RANGE SCAN CZ_CONFIG_ITEMS_PK (cr=19 pr=0 pw=0 time=264 us)(object id 3049621)
3 TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID CZ_PS_NODES (cr=1222 pr=0 pw=0 time=15920 us)
3 INDEX RANGE SCAN CZ_PS_NODES_N12 (cr=1219 pr=0 pw=0 time=15863 us)(object id 750095)
1 SORT AGGREGATE (cr=1211 pr=0 pw=0 time=15753 us)
209 TABLE ACCESS FULL CZ_DEVL_PROJECTS (cr=1211 pr=0 pw=0 time=15452 us)
18 INDEX RANGE SCAN CZ_LOCALIZED_TEXTS_N1 (cr=11 pr=0 pw=0 time=79 us)(object id 31504)
19 TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID CZ_CONFIG_ITEMS (cr=778 pr=0 pw=0 time=20571 us)
5816 NESTED LOOPS (cr=202 pr=0 pw=0 time=8497 us)
21 NESTED LOOPS (cr=96 pr=0 pw=0 time=2037 us)
23 TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID ASO_QUOTE_LINES_ALL (cr=47 pr=0 pw=0 time=1427 us)
1058 INDEX RANGE SCAN ASO_QUOTE_LINES_ALL_N1 (cr=9 pr=0 pw=0 time=51 us)(object id 81688)
21 TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID ASO_QUOTE_LINE_DETAILS (cr=49 pr=0 pw=0 time=596 us)
21 INDEX RANGE SCAN ASO_QUOTE_LINE_DETAILS_N1 (cr=28 pr=0 pw=0 time=323 us)(object id 81706)
5794 INDEX RANGE SCAN CZ_CONFIG_ITEMS_PK (cr=106 pr=0 pw=0 time=1424 us)(object id 3049621)Hi
After affed the exist operator i got below output. But it is more than that the previous one.
SELECT czci.config_hdr_id, czci.config_rev_nbr, asoqla.quantity,
(SELECT node_desc.localized_str
FROM cz_localized_texts node_desc,
cz_ps_nodes ps_nodes,
cz_config_items czci1
WHERE czci1.config_hdr_id = asoqld.config_header_id
AND czci1.config_rev_nbr = asoqld.config_revision_num
AND node_desc.intl_text_id = ps_nodes.intl_text_id
AND NVL (node_desc.LANGUAGE, USERENV ('LANG')) = USERENV ('LANG')
AND czci1.ps_node_id = ps_nodes.persistent_node_id
AND ps_nodes.devl_project_id = (SELECT MAX (devl_project_id)
FROM cz_devl_projects
WHERE NAME = 'Control Model')
AND EXISTS (
SELECT NULL
FROM cz_config_items sub_sub
WHERE sub_sub.config_hdr_id = asoqld.config_header_id
AND sub_sub.config_rev_nbr = asoqld.config_revision_num
AND sub_sub.ps_node_name = 'fittings'
AND czci1.parent_config_item_id = sub_sub.config_item_id))
fitting_material,
(SELECT node_desc.localized_str
FROM cz_localized_texts node_desc,
cz_ps_nodes ps_nodes,
cz_config_items czci1
WHERE czci1.config_hdr_id = asoqld.config_header_id
AND czci1.config_rev_nbr = asoqld.config_revision_num
AND node_desc.intl_text_id = ps_nodes.intl_text_id
AND node_desc.LANGUAGE = USERENV ('LANG')
AND czci1.ps_node_id = ps_nodes.persistent_node_id
AND ps_nodes.devl_project_id = (SELECT MAX (devl_project_id)
FROM cz_devl_projects
WHERE NAME = 'Control Model')
AND EXISTS (
SELECT NULL
FROM cz_config_items sub_sub
WHERE sub_sub.config_hdr_id = czci.config_hdr_id
AND sub_sub.config_rev_nbr = czci.config_rev_nbr
AND sub_sub.ps_node_name = 'tubing'
AND czci1.parent_config_item_id = sub_sub.config_item_id))
tubing_material
FROM aso_quote_lines_all asoqla,
aso_quote_line_details asoqld,
cz_config_items czci
WHERE asoqla.quote_header_id = 55774
AND asoqla.item_type_code = 'MDL'
--AND asoqla.org_id = 2763
AND asoqla.quote_line_id = asoqld.quote_line_id
AND asoqld.config_header_id = czci.config_hdr_id
AND asoqld.config_revision_num = czci.config_rev_nbr
AND czci.ps_node_name = 'CONTROL MASTER ASLY'
call count cpu elapsed disk query current rows
Parse 1 0.02 0.03 0 0 0 0
Execute 1 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 0
Fetch 3 0.16 0.14 0 16526 0 19
total 5 0.18 0.17 0 16526 0 19
Misses in library cache during parse: 1
Optimizer goal: ALL_ROWS
Parsing user id: 173 (APPS)
Rows Row Source Operation
3 TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID CZ_LOCALIZED_TEXTS (cr=7874 pr=0 pw=0 time=51192 us)
40 NESTED LOOPS (cr=7871 pr=0 pw=0 time=50953 us)
3 NESTED LOOPS (cr=7860 pr=0 pw=0 time=50729 us)
3 TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID CZ_CONFIG_ITEMS (cr=6638 pr=0 pw=0 time=33183 us)
3 INDEX RANGE SCAN CZ_CONFIG_ITEMS_N1 (cr=6635 pr=0 pw=0 time=33060 us)(object id 31734)
3 TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID CZ_CONFIG_ITEMS (cr=6536 pr=0 pw=0 time=22873 us)
1292 INDEX UNIQUE SCAN CZ_CONFIG_ITEMS_PK (cr=5244 pr=0 pw=0 time=15326 us)(object id 3049621)
3 TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID CZ_PS_NODES (cr=1222 pr=0 pw=0 time=17483 us)
3 INDEX RANGE SCAN CZ_PS_NODES_N12 (cr=1219 pr=0 pw=0 time=17411 us)(object id 750095)
1 SORT AGGREGATE (cr=1211 pr=0 pw=0 time=17266 us)
209 TABLE ACCESS FULL CZ_DEVL_PROJECTS (cr=1211 pr=0 pw=0 time=16844 us)
18 INDEX RANGE SCAN CZ_LOCALIZED_TEXTS_N1 (cr=11 pr=0 pw=0 time=122 us)(object id 31504)
3 NESTED LOOPS (cr=7874 pr=0 pw=0 time=48203 us)
3 NESTED LOOPS (cr=7860 pr=0 pw=0 time=47973 us)
3 TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID CZ_CONFIG_ITEMS (cr=6638 pr=0 pw=0 time=30352 us)
3 INDEX RANGE SCAN CZ_CONFIG_ITEMS_N1 (cr=6635 pr=0 pw=0 time=30218 us)(object id 31734)
3 TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID CZ_CONFIG_ITEMS (cr=6536 pr=0 pw=0 time=20960 us)
1292 INDEX UNIQUE SCAN CZ_CONFIG_ITEMS_PK (cr=5244 pr=0 pw=0 time=14224 us)(object id 3049621)
3 TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID CZ_PS_NODES (cr=1222 pr=0 pw=0 time=17570 us)
3 INDEX RANGE SCAN CZ_PS_NODES_N12 (cr=1219 pr=0 pw=0 time=17510 us)(object id 750095)
1 SORT AGGREGATE (cr=1211 pr=0 pw=0 time=17395 us)
209 TABLE ACCESS FULL CZ_DEVL_PROJECTS (cr=1211 pr=0 pw=0 time=16937 us)
3 TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID CZ_LOCALIZED_TEXTS (cr=14 pr=0 pw=0 time=165 us)
3 INDEX UNIQUE SCAN CZ_LOCALIZED_TEXTS_PK (cr=11 pr=0 pw=0 time=132 us)(object id 3050530)
19 TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID CZ_CONFIG_ITEMS (cr=778 pr=0 pw=0 time=41677 us)
5816 NESTED LOOPS (cr=202 pr=0 pw=0 time=16173 us)
21 NESTED LOOPS (cr=96 pr=0 pw=0 time=3617 us)
23 TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID ASO_QUOTE_LINES_ALL (cr=47 pr=0 pw=0 time=2528 us)
1058 INDEX RANGE SCAN ASO_QUOTE_LINES_ALL_N1 (cr=9 pr=0 pw=0 time=83 us)(object id 81688)
21 TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID ASO_QUOTE_LINE_DETAILS (cr=49 pr=0 pw=0 time=1053 us)
21 INDEX RANGE SCAN ASO_QUOTE_LINE_DETAILS_N1 (cr=28 pr=0 pw=0 time=598 us)(object id 81706)
5794 INDEX RANGE SCAN CZ_CONFIG_ITEMS_PK (cr=106 pr=0 pw=0 time=8245 us)(object id 3049621) -
How to reduce the query execution time
hai all,
We have created query on Purchasing Cube 0PUR_C01 for
Purchase Order (PO) analysis for single vendor materials, but it is taking long time to execute (about 45 sec...).
In the above Query we have used the following things:
In Columns:
i) Exceptional aggregation for maximum & minimum PO Net Price using reference characteristic as Calendar Day.
ii) Minimum PO Price value we have multiplied with Actual GR Quantity for the calculation of Impact of Lowest PO Net Price.
iii) Number of vendors calculated key figure.
In Rows:i) Only Material
In Filters:
i) Plant with variable select Option u2013 Optional.
ii) Calendar Year / Month with Select Option u2013 Optional.
iii) Material with excluded Unassigned (#).
iv) Vendor with excluded Unassigned (#).
Following are we have used for Performance:
i) Aggregates using Propose from query (only for this query).
ii) Partitioning on Calendar Year / Month (For 1 year 14 partitions) i.e. (04.2007 to 03.2008).
iii) Collapse.
iv) In RSRT we have set the following properties
Read Mode = H
Req.Status = 0
Catch Mode = 4
Persistence Mode = 3 (BLOB)
Optimization mode = 0.
Our inputs to this Query:
i) We are passing plant range 1201 to 1299.
ii) Calendar Year / Month 04.2007 to 03.2008.
So please suggest me how to reduce the execution time.
please help me.
Thanks,
kiran manyamHi,
First of all its a complete question with all the details. Good work.
As you partitioned the cube based on calmonth and you are also giving calmonth in selection, it will definitely work towards improved query performance.
As you are putting plant values in the selection, is there any aggregate available on plant characteristics? If not creating a aggregate on plant will help.
Regards,
Yogesh -
How can I reduce the recording time of the webcam?
How can I reduce the recording time of the webcam?
thanks
AlexKeep in mind that Logic also has a limit of 8550 quarter notes. So changing the time signature to 4/8 can get longer recording times. So make sure you change this setting along with the song end. See page 93 in the reference manual.
MBP 1.83 & MDD 1G DP Mac OS X (10.4.7) Logic Pro 7.2.2, Motu 828MkII+828, Firebox LC&XT, Tranzport, Unitor8+(3x)AMT-8's -
How do I change my iTunes settings to lower the resolution of movies I download to reduce the download time?
If you're buying HD movies, you can change the setting in the Store preferences in iTunes to prefer 720p. Or you can just buy SD versions.
Regards. -
Web report for opening it takes long time how to reduce the time?
HI Experts,
I created report using webi. For next time while opening it takes more time. How to reduce the time.Hi Manikandan,
There could be multiple reason behind the bad performance.
1. Are you using supported JVM version to run Webi reports?
2. Do the reports contain prompts? Are the LOVs set to "Automatic refresh before use"? If yes, uncheck it.
3. How many queries do the report has? Can you run the queries one by one and check which query is taking much time?
4. If it based on relational database, copy and run it against the database directly and check how much time it takes. If more, you may have to fix the issue at database level like using temporary tables, indices, etc.
5. Also check if there are firewalls or proxy server between client and server communication. if yes, try to refresh the report directly on BO server and check.
6. Check if there is any hinderance between BO server and Database server communcation.
Hope it will help.
Regards,
Yuvraj -
OK, for the third time writing this this session, after setting up iCloud on my IPMini, how do I access the clod to use the iWork apps?
Note that you can not log into iCloud.com through the browser on an iOS device, only from a computer. If you want to use the iWork apps on your iOS device, you will need to purchase the apps from the app store if you don't qualify to get them for free.
Maybe you are looking for
-
How to restrict the charactersitic values in reporting
Hi All, I have a CCA report with characterstic "GL Accont". Instead of displaying the complete characteristic values i want to display the first 3 characters out of EIGHT characters in that report( say "10003WW", i need to display it as "100" only).
-
How to add a log file to an MaxDB?
I see that we have only one log file there. I want to add more. Please help either the syntax or the GUI menu path. Thanks!
-
We are migrating forms from forms6i to 9i In forms 6i they are using the below code. l_cursor := dbms_sql.open_cursor; dbms_sql.parse(l_cursor, l_stmt,2); l_result := dbms_sql.execute(l_cursor); dbms_sql.close_cursor(l_cursor); In forms9i this is giv
-
Speed of whatsapp with Nokia Asha 302
I am a long time Nokia fan and wanted to buy Nokia Asha 302. I would prefer having a qwerty physical keypad and this is the best option available in Nokia now. I am using an android phone too with 1.2GHZ dual core processor + 1 GB RAM and 16 GB inter
-
Rman Retention policy to recovery window
Hi, I have few basic doubts in RMAN backup policy 1 . Is that possible to set Retention policy to recovery window in minutes?? 2 . If i set Backup Retention Policy to recovery window to 3 days and i am performing RMAN differential incremental backup