How to remove frequently called numbers

Is there a way to remove or delete those numbers that are called? Under the tab favorites a list shows up how do I get rid of that list without deleting my contacts?

That removes them from the Recent tab, but it's similar for the Favorites tab (which I believe was the question, if I'm reading the post correctly), i.e., Contacts > Favorites > settings bar (the three vertical dots) > Remove From Favorites > place check next to the ones you want to delete > Done. And again, they won't be deleted in your Contacts. That at least works on a Samsung S5 with the latest updates; on some phones and some OS', that list under the Favorites tab can't be removed.

Similar Messages

How do I add most frequently called numbers

How do I add most frequently called numbers?
Thank you,
Marilyn

If you mean call favorites, open Phone, tap the Favorites button at the bottom, tap the plus sign at the top, choose the contact and number you want to add.

How to remove the track numbers

When I burn an mp3 disk. Itune adds the track number to the file name of my music and any folder on the cd. My cd player only will display the first 12 characters of the song name, which is "01 - Walking", when it could be "Walking on S". Which is a bit better. Is there a way to turn this numbering off, or can I burn to a harddrive folder and then edit the names taking the numbering out and then burn that folder to the cd??
Rachael

Do this...
Quit iTunes.
Open the Terminal application.
Type or copy paste this into the Terminal window.
defaults write com.apple.iTunes create-filenames-with-tracknumber -bool FALSE
Open iTunes.
Go to iTunes prefs -> Advanced.
Uncheck *Keep iTunes music folder organized*, then recheck it.
It will go through and remove all track numbers.
Any new additions to iTunes will not have track numbers placed in the filename.
To set it back to normal (if you want at some time), open Terminal and copy/paste
defaults write com.apple.iTunes create-filenames-with-tracknumber -bool TRUE

How to remove wrlock calls ?

We have analysed the performance of our applications using Quantify and find that a lot of the time is spent in calls to llrw_wrlock/unlock etc.
Our application is written in C++ built using SunWS4.2 on Solaris 2.6.
The application is single-threaded but sits on top of a thread-safe 'architecture' designed in-house.
We make use of the RogueWave libaries Tools.h/Money.h, and of Oracle 8.1.6.
I know from dbx that our application consists of 3 threads. 1 of which is the 'application' thread (where the application functionality is executed), 1 thread sits on a signotify wait, another sits on a condtimedwait.
I have looked on google to try to identify what the llrw_wrlock is (I had already guessed it was mutex lock related) - and came to the conclusion that it may be related to thread context switching. (We are using unbound LWP threads). I also determined that we were using a SCHED_OTHER thread scheduling policy. So I concluded that if I could keep the 'application' thread on CPU (or more to the point - on LWP) then I might improve performance.
I experimented with changing thread scheduling policy (using sched_setscheduler) but eventually found that only SCHED_OTHER is supported on Solaris when using native Solaris threads. (Note to Sun: the man pages are very poor in this area - man sched_setscheduler gives the impression that the other policies are supported - and it is not until one does 'man thr_setprio' that one realises that only SCHED_OTHER is supported - or if one is lucky enough to have the Sun Education "Multi-threaded Application Programming" manual to hand ;-[ ).
I also experimented with changing thread priority for the 'application' thread (trying priorities of 120 through to 127, and also a priority of 10 - in case I had misunderstood the man pages).
All my experiments have been to no avail - there was no performance change between my modified applications and the unmodified.
I also created a stock C++ application
int k=0;
for (int i = 0; i< 1000;++i)
for (int j=0;j < 1000000; ++j)
k++;
I compiled this and compared it against the same algorithm executed from within one of our 'architecture' wrappers - again no difference in performance, which gave me the impression that there was no negligible performance overhead caused by the"multi-threaded" nature of our architecture.
This has led me to believe that the Quantify figures produced are a red-herring ?
Can anyone else confirm my findings or has had similar performance issues that they have now overcome ? (If so - could you please indicate what the solution is ?)
Many thanks
Paul McGrath

We have analysed the performance of our applications
using QuantifyYou may be interested to know that the latest version of Workshop,
called Sun ONE Studio 7 Enterprise Edition, comes with a tool
called Performance Analyzer that will give you a lot more information.
In particular, it will tell you not only where you are spending your
time but how you got there (call stack) and which of multiple paths
through the call stack is taking the most time. It will also analyze
time spent at various types of locks.
and find that a lot of the time is
spent in calls to llrw_wrlock/unlock etc.As you probably know, rw_wrlock is an interface to something
called a readers-writer lock. It is a form of mutual exclusion lock
that allows many readers into a protected section but only one
writer. llrw_wrlock is new to me, but it's virtually certain to be
related.
So I
concluded that if I could keep the 'application'
thread on CPU (or more to the point - on LWP) then I
might improve performance.
I experimented with changing thread scheduling policy
(using sched_setscheduler) but eventually found that
only SCHED_OTHER is supported on Solaris when using
native Solaris threads.Based on your comment that you want to keep the app on
one LWP, I think you are more interested in the scope of
contention than in priority or policy. Scope of contention
is the scope within which the LWP competes for resources.
Threads are not visible to Solaris or the Solaris 2.6 scheduler.
Only LWPs are visible. By using unbound threads, you are
potentially using fewer kernel-scheduled LWPs than user-
created threads. Setting the scope of contention of your app
thread to systemwide rather than its present setting will
allow the thread to contend for resources (CPU time, for
example) directly at a system level. It will make it a bound
thread, which means that your thread (a user-level concept)
will be bound one-to-one with an LWP (an OS-level concept).
Binding the thread to an LWP allows the thread to compete,
through its LWP, for resources.
However, that is not your problem because...
I know from dbx that our application consists of 3
threads. 1 of which is the 'application' thread (where
the application functionality is executed), 1 thread
sits on a signotify wait, another sits on a
condtimedwait....and that means that two of your three threads are just
sitting there and not taking or wasting any resources.
They will just sit quietly until they are allowed to proceed
by getting notified in the case of the first one or by either
having the condition on which it is waiting met or having
the timeout expire in the case of the second one. And
if those two threads aren't taking any time then...
I also experimented with changing thread priority for
the 'application' thread (trying priorities of 120
through to 127, and also a priority of 10 - in case I
had misunderstood the man pages).... adjusting the priority is not going to help because
a higher priority only lets you go ahead of another LWP
with a lower priority that is taking resources that you
want. However, the other LWPs are sitting quietly and
not taking any resources. You can have any priority you
want, high or low, and your results will not change
because priority determines your place in line and you
are the only one in line at the moment.
This has led me to believe that the Quantify figures
produced are a red-herring ?Sounds good to me. Although I have never used Quantify,
the story that Quantify is telling (and that I am able to
judge only second-hand from your retelling thereof) is not
correct, or is at least incomplete.
Can anyone else confirm my findings or has had similar
performance issues that they have now overcome ? (If
so - could you please indicate what the solution is
?)The solution is to get Sun ONE Studio 7 Enterprise Edition
and use Performance Analyzer. Performance Analyzer
will tell you where your time is going in terms of inclusive
or exclusive elapsed wall clock time, CPU time, system
time or user time. On an UltraSPARC-III, it will use the
hardware counters to show you where you are spending
time on cache misses, pipeline stalls, mispredicted
branches, and a dozen other factors. It will attribute the
time to specific methods and even a specific line of
source. It will analyze your code built with compilers from
Sun, gnu, PGI, Fujitsu, and any other. If you have no money
then get the Try-and-Buy and at least take it for a spin on
this problem.

How to remove duplicate phone numbers under iMessage settings?

I've been using iMessage for a while now and a lot of my friends have brought to my attention that every iMessage I sent showed it came from my email rather than my phone number. So I signed out of iMessage and tried logging back in using my phone number and it would not work, saying the activation did not go through. So I tried again and again throughout the day and it finally worked eventually. The problem is I get a duplicate (lots of it) of my phone numbers, I'm guessing from my countless attempts at signing in. How do I go about removing all the duplicates that are grayed out? Also why do the last three have tick marks next to them? How do I make it so that only one of them is tickmarked and delete the rest of the duplicates. I've provided screenshots below.
Also, "waiting for activation..." has been shown under the settings for almost the whole day. How long does this take?

I've tried signing out and back in again. It doesn't do anything. I still get the unnecesarily long list of duplicate phone numbers and have 2 or 3 of them randomly tick marked. I've tried this multiple times, it doesn't get rid of them at all. As far as I'm concerned, my friends do receive my iMessage from my number rather than my email. I just find it a nuisance to have such a long list of my phone number 25 times over. I don't think it affects anything though, but any way to get rid of them would be great.
Also, it's been 3 days and it still says "waiting for activation" on my iMessage and Facetime settings. How long does this take? As far as I know, my friends have told me iMessaging with me is flawless but I'm confused as to why it's still trying to activate.

How to display incoming caller numbers from india

I live in US. When some one calls from india, No caller ID is displayed on iphone. How to see the number. I already verified that the callers did not blocked their numbers from being visible.

I am using att. The number gets displayed on other att phones but not on iphone. This makes me believe that it should be problem with iphone.!

Serial Number Management, how to remove item serial numbering?

Hello,
I assigned serial numbers an item on the system, but i don't use serial numbering. now when i create a Goods Receipt PO for this item i have to assign serial numbers for it. can this be removed and how? the serial numbers are managed on every transaction.
Thanks

Hi,
If you dont want to use the serial number at all, you can always go the particular item and chane the "Manage Item By" to None provided you don't have any instock for that item If you have some stock, you have to make the in stock zero and then change this setting.
Else, you can use, On release only setting rather than On every transaction. Hope this helps.
Thanks,
Joseph

Pages 5.1 can anyone help with removing previous page numbers please?

Hi. in the new pages 5.1 I have made a section break at page 10 in a document and found how to start numbering from page 10 as page 1. Can anyone please tell me how to remove the page numbers from 1 to 10 that preceed this section?

from the speed can I assume that it was adsl (copper) and not fibre connection?
which hub do you have?
can you enter your phone number and post results remember to delete number https://www.btwholesale.com/includes/adsl/main.html
If you like a post, or want to say thanks for a helpful answer, please click on the Ratings star on the left-hand side of the post.
If someone answers your question correctly please let other members know by clicking on ’Mark as Accepted Solution’.

Remove gridlines in Numbers

Does anyone know how to remove gridlines in Numbers? In Excel, you click on Options and uncheck the gridlines checkbox. In Numbers, I can't find the same. Any suggestions?

Hi Will,
That's not the behaviour I'm getting. Here's a screen shot, taken while Show Print view was in effect. The table on the right is a duplicate of the one on the left. Except for being selected, and having different names, the tables are identical.
Note that the light grey fill of the header row and header column is visible in both, as is the darker grey fill I applied to two cells in the original table before duplicating.
Preparing these, I did notice one missing instruction in my previous post; Removing the cell borders requires a two pass process:
Select the block of cells (or the whole table)
Pass 1
click the border selection button (left of the one showing "thin" in the post above) and choose Outside Edges.
Click the line style button ("thin") and select 'none'
Pass 2
click the border selection button (left of the one showing "thin" in the post above) and choose Inside Borders.
Click the line style button ("thin") and select 'none' (even if it already shows this).
Click away from the table to deselect it and view the results.
Regards,
Barry

N8 how to bring back Frequently Dialed numbers

My N8 had the Frequently Dialed numbers widget on the home screen, but i removed it. How can I get it back there?
Solved!
Go to Solution.

You have to add a widget called Favourites to one of your homescreens. If you don't already have a blank position in the homescreen you will need to remove an existing widget to make space.
I presume you already know how to edit and setup a homescreen since you were able to remove the widget in the first place.

I have all my devices connected to iCloud. I would like a reduced contact list on my iPhone without removing any from my master list on my computer. How do I delete contact numbers from my phone without disrupting the master list on my computer?

I have all my devices connected to iCloud. I would like a reduced contact list on my iPhone without removing any from my master list on my computer. How do I delete contact numbers from my iphone without disrupting the master list on my computer?

Are you trying to reduce the visual clutter on the phone, save space on the phone, or limit the security exposure if your phone is stolen?
If you are only wanting to reduce the visual clutter and make scrolling through the list faster, you could set up a group on the computer containing only the contacts you want to see on my phone (called, for example, "Show on my Phone") and enable only that group inside Contacts on the phone. You might even have one or more existing groups that you could enable that way (maybe "Family" and "Personal").

How can i remove a pages/numbers template

How can i remove a pages/numbers template.
They used to be in the library in my home map, but i can't find the library on my HD.
Is there anyone who knowes a solution
Greets Kloria

Hi everyone,
I find the answer myself.
Go tot the finder, select Go in the menu, push the alt button and there it is.
De library is now visible and you can open it.
Find Application support > iWorks > Pages or Numbers > Templates > My Templates.
Remove the template, thats it.
Greets Kloria

How do I remove my caller id from my samsung convoy phone so that the person I call does not see my name?

How do I remove my caller id from my samsung convoy phone so that the person I call does not see my name?

MojaveMoon's solution will work if there is only one person you want to block your ID from; if you want to block your caller ID from everyone, you can go to your account online, go to Change Features, and scroll down till you see Caller ID block. Instructions say that once this is activated, you can dial *82 before any # you WANT to display your number to, but all others will be blocked.
If you are on a Family share plan, the account owner needs to log in and choose your line to activate this feature.

"Ghost" page numbers on every second page - how to remove?

Hi,
I'm setting a short book with Pages and after importing from Word, I'm seeing duplicate, partially hidden additional page numbers on every second page. I'd like to remove them entirely, keeping Pages' page numbering. Removing and inserting page numbers doesn't help and the second set of numbers can't be selected in any way (clicking, dragging don't work). One solution would be to re-import from word, deselecting page numbers beforehand, but I'd rather like avoid this step as I made many changes in Pages.
Here's a screenshot showing the duplicate page numbers: http://dl.dropbox.com/u/3304376/pages_bug.png
Does anybody have an idea how to remove them?

Hello,
Sometimes in the process of importing from Word, page numbers are improperly converted to Master Objects or Background Objects. Go to Format > Advanced > Make Master Objects Selectable. Then, with the cursor in the Margin of the document, press the Command Key (Cursor changes to an Arrow) and drag the cursor diagonally across the page number to select it. Then press the Delete key and the number should be gone. You need to check carefully to make sure that you have eliminated all the instances. There may be one per Section.
Jerry

How can I increase the number of saved previously called numbers?

When I press the call key about 10 in/out called numbers show up. My old phone had like 50 previously called or received numbers. How can I increase the number of saved calls?

Unfortunately there is no such setting to increase number of saved calls on the device.
Message Edited by rafo on 15-05-2009 12:53 PM
if your issue solved set "Solution" mark at the relevant post

How to remove frequently called numbers

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for