How to set number of rows in filters?

Hi, we need to set another number of rows which is displayed in filters on bex or web template?
Thanks for advice

Hi Pavel,
can you please specify your question more clearly. If you are on NW 7.0 you can determine a number of colums for your filter item with following command:
COLUMNS
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw70ehp1/helpdata/en/85/08e241aa8e9d39e10000000a155106/content.htm
If you meant the amount of rows within the analysis item you can use following command within your analysis item:
BLOCK_ROWS_SIZE (numbers of rows displayed at once)
BLOCK_ROWS_STEP_SIZE (numbers of rows to be scrolled for one step)
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw70ehp1/helpdata/en/76/489d39d342de00e10000000a11402f/content.htm
Brgds,
Marcel
Edited by: Marcel Landsfried on Feb 10, 2009 7:45 PM
Edited due to wrong url

Similar Messages

How to set number of rows in "Rows Per Page Selector" in Interactive Report

Hi Guys,
Is there any way to set the number of rows in "Rows Per Page Selector" in Interactive Report. By default it is set to 15.
I know one way is to change the number of rows when you are running the report and then set that as 'Default Report Setting'.
If anybody is aware of any other way, please let me know.
Cheers,
Ashish Agarwal
http://www.dbcon.com.sg

Hi Pavel,
can you please specify your question more clearly. If you are on NW 7.0 you can determine a number of colums for your filter item with following command:
COLUMNS
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw70ehp1/helpdata/en/85/08e241aa8e9d39e10000000a155106/content.htm
If you meant the amount of rows within the analysis item you can use following command within your analysis item:
BLOCK_ROWS_SIZE (numbers of rows displayed at once)
BLOCK_ROWS_STEP_SIZE (numbers of rows to be scrolled for one step)
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw70ehp1/helpdata/en/76/489d39d342de00e10000000a11402f/content.htm
Brgds,
Marcel
Edited by: Marcel Landsfried on Feb 10, 2009 7:45 PM
Edited due to wrong url

How to set number of Rows of a table to be displayed based on user action?

Hi Experts,
I am getting data into the table. But only 5 records are displayed default. I want it to be a user selection.
If user wishes to see 10 records, then first 10 records should get displayed. If user selects 'n' records then 'n' records should get displayed..
How to achieve this?
Regards,
Yugesh A.

hi Yugesh ,
1 create a input field UI
2 bind its value property to a attribute
3 suppose ca_check attribute ( type string ) under node cn_check is binded
read this in ur doinit of the view
DATA lo_nd_cn_check TYPE REF TO if_wd_context_node.
DATA lo_el_cn_check TYPE REF TO if_wd_context_element.
DATA ls_cn_check TYPE wd_this->element_cn_check.
DATA lv_ca_check LIKE ls_cn_check-ca_check.
* navigate from <CONTEXT> to <CN_CHECK> via lead selection
lo_nd_cn_check = wd_context->get_child_node( name = wd_this->wdctx_cn_check ).
* get element via lead selection
lo_el_cn_check = lo_nd_cn_check->get_element( ).
* get single attribute
lo_el_cn_check->get_attribute(
    EXPORTING
      name = `CA_CHECK`
    IMPORTING
      value = lv_ca_check ).
4 nw for ur table , make a another context attribute of type either string or I , say attr1
bind its visiblerowcount property of table to attr1
5 make a attribute in ATTRIBUTES tab of type string , say attribute
set its value to lv_ca_check in doinit itself
wd_this->attribute = lv_ca_Check
6 nw in the method , where u need to validate how m,any rows user enter or doinit itself , set attr1 to the value of that attribute created under ATTRIBUTES tab ( named attribute)
DATA : lv_count type string .
lv_count = wd_this->attribute
7 nw its very simple , set attr1 to lv_count , as it contains the count of the number which has entered in the input field
DATA lo_nd_cn_check TYPE REF TO if_wd_context_node.
DATA lo_el_cn_check TYPE REF TO if_wd_context_element.
DATA ls_cn_check TYPE wd_this->element_cn_check.
DATA attr1 LIKE ls_cn_check-ca_check.
* navigate from <CONTEXT> to <CN_CHECK> via lead selection
lo_nd_cn_check = wd_context->get_child_node( name = wd_this->wdctx_cn_check ).
* get element via lead selection
lo_el_cn_check = lo_nd_cn_check->get_element( ).
* set single attribute
lo_el_cn_check->set_attribute(
    EXPORTING
      name = `attr1`
      value = lv_count ).
I hope it shud help
proceed like these , u wud be able to achieve the desired functionality
regards,
amit
Edited by: amit saini on Oct 20, 2009 1:12 PM

How to generate an incrementing batch-number per set number of rows

Hi,
How could you generate an incrementing batch-number per set number of rows for a table in SQL?
The returned result set of the SQL query should show a preceding batch number per row set and incremented by 1 for the next row set.
Eg, you want to start the batch_number by 1 for the first three returned rows of the table and than increment by 1 for the next three rows.
The result set would look like:
BATCH_NO, TAB_COL1, TAB_COL2, TAB_COL3, TAB_COL4, ..
1, ...
1, ...
1, ...
2, ...
2, ...
2, ...
3, ...
3, ...
3, ...
etc.
Cheers.

Many thanks guys, I would have never thought about these options.. Yes the reason for adding the preceding batch number has to do with migrating data from a source table where we only can grab small sets of rows at the time to bring across to a target table.
Cheers.

How to get number of rows return in SELECT query

i'm very new in java, i have a question:
- How to get number of rows return in SELECT query?
(i use SQL Server 2000 Driver for JDBC and everything are done, i only want to know problems above)
Thanks.

make the result set scroll insensitve, do rs.last(), get the row num, and call rs.beforeFirst(), then you can process the result set like you currently do.
         String sql = "select * from testing";
         PreparedStatement ps =
          con.prepareStatement(sql,ResultSet.TYPE_SCROLL_INSENSITIVE,ResultSet.CONCUR_READ_ONLY);
         ResultSet rs = ps.executeQuery();
         rs.last();
         System.out.println("Row count = " + rs.getRow());
         rs.beforeFirst();~Tim
NOTE: Ugly, but does the trick.

How to increase number of rows display in ESS

Hi All,
how to increase number of rows display in ESS applications especially in Time approval inbox from standard display of 5 rows to say like 20 rows? is there a quick way to do it?
Thanks all
Murty

Kalpesh,
it is actually in web dynpro view, I have seen this setting and it doesnt give option for increasing default number of rows in web dynpro application. Table is dynamically constructed in web dynpro implementation and I have the hard time finding out., Any help is appreciated in these lines,
Thanks
Murty

How to restrict number of rows display using ig:gridView

Hi
All
How to restrict number of rows display using <ig:gridView datasource="{mybean.mylist}">
i am getting 10 rows using data_row . i wanna show only first 5 rows .
pageSize ="5" will be ok . but it displays remaining rows in next page. but i want to display only first 5 rows . is there any attribute to restrict number of rows.
thanks
rambhapuri

I have no idea which component you're talking about. If want to discuss here about a non-Sun JSF component, then please mention about the name, version and build in detail. You can also consider posting this question at the website/forum/mailinglist of the component manfacturer rather than here. At least I can tell you that the Sun JSF h:dataTable has the 'rows' attribute for that. I can also suggest you to just take a look in the TLD documentation of the component in question. There should be all possible attributes listed with a detailed explanation about the behaviour.

How to calculate number of rows for perticular characterstic in SAP BI Bex

Hi experts,
Please let me know how to calculate ' number of rows ' for perticular characterstic in Bex query.
Thanks & Regards,
Babu..

Hello,
You can try this
Create a CKF and assign the vale 1 to it. Open the query and select Character where you want to display ' number of rows ', go to properties windows, select 'display', in the results row drop down box, select 'always display'.
Thanks.
With regards,
Anand Kumar

How to display number of rows as columns in a select statement? This is on

How to display number of rows as columns in a select statement? This is on 10g R2.
Thanks,
R

For the current (ie. row 1 of 100)
row_number over (order by -pick_a_column_set) as rnfor the total number of columns returned in your query
count(*) over() as total_count

How to count number of rows in table

can I get number of row in table except Count(*) in pl/sql
is there any other way

Also posted and answered here
how to count number of rows in table
count(*) will be the fastest way. It is only slow if the table has a vast number of rows, in which case why do you need to know the tables has 73552436467721 rows and not 73552436467737 rows. It doesn't seem to be much use. Either that or you are counting them a lot, which again seems rather pointless.

How to set to display rows no. in source program

how to set to display rows no. in source program ?

Hi,
If u r working in 4.5B or older then u ll get it automatically.
If u want to get numbering in 4.7 or ECC u just do this.
Utilities -> settings -> ABAP editor
Then u can select new editor or lod and u can find lot of options there.
Regards,
Subbu

How do I set number of rows displayed in portlet

How do I specify how many rows will be displayed when I publish a workbook as a Portal Portlet ? I tried to set the number of rows per page using Plus, but this is not reflected in the portlet.

Naviagte Ak Developer>Define Regions
define Display Rows

Estimated and actual number of rows at filtered statistics

I have query like this:
SELECT productID FROM dbo.table WHERE nar_closed=1 AND nar_status=0
I have filtered index:
CREATE NONCLUSTERED INDEX [x_status] ON [dbo].[Table]
(nar_status ASC)
INCLUDE(productID)
WHERE nar_closed=1
In execution plan I can see that there is index seek - so optimal plan. But, estimated number of rows is 1716930 and actual number of rows is only 63260. How is that possible? I have rebuild index and statistic is up to date. Statistic is also filtered(like
index). Is there some problem with filtered statistics?
What should i do, to get actual and estimated number of rows similar?

I'm usually busy Monday night, but it turned that I got this one off.
SELECT @productID=i.item_id
FROM dbo.order_item i INNER JOIN dbo.order_header h ON i.header_id = h.header_id
WHERE i.last_item=1 AND i.item_finished=0 AND h.order_status IN(1,2,3) OPTION (MAXDOP 1, RECOMPILE)
So this is a different query from which I looked at during the weekend. Yes, you get incorrect estimates, but there is a simple reason for this. Look this query:
SELECT h.order_status, COUNT(*)
FROM order_header h
JOIN order_item i ON i.header_id = h.header_id
GROUP BY h.order_status
ORDER BY h.order_status
The output is:
order_status
0 434
1 4
2 357231
4 2311649
But look at:
SELECT h.order_status, COUNT(*)
FROM order_header h
JOIN order_item i ON i.header_id = h.header_id
WHERE i.last_item = 1
AND i.item_finished = 0
GROUP BY h.order_status
ORDER BY h.order_status
This produces:
order_status
0 76
1 4
2 63179
4 1
You have a skew. There is big correlation between having a row with item_last = 1 and item_finished = 0 and order_status = 2. Which you probably knew already. But SQL Server has no clue!
I was trying to figure out exactly how it arrived at that number, but SQL Server may be smarter than me, because my computations landed at even lower numbers.
Dealing with skews is often difficult, and you tend to end up with tricks, some uglier than others. I tried adding this filtering statistics on order_item:
CREATE STATISTICS order_item.header_filter_stat ON
order_item(header_id) WHERE last_item = 1 AND item_finished = 0
WITH FULLSCAN
But that lowered the estimate even more! If I drop the filter index ix_last, I get a Merge Join, wich only has a 50% misestimate, but I suspect that it does not give better performance. (The data volume is not significant to tell.)
I'm not concered about memory grant but with number of estimated rows.
But your concern was hash spill, and hash spill occurs because the memory grant is too low, and it is low due to the low row estimate.
Erland, I'm assigning to the varibale just for the sake of example - to get rid of table result set.
But since the query is logically different, the optimizer could produce a different plan. It does not seem to make that shortcut, but you never know. When I don't want to see the result set, I usually use SELECT INTO.
Erland Sommarskog, SQL Server MVP, [email protected]

How to get number of rows

Hi!
Can someone tell me how to obtain the number of rows returned by a query?
I tried to use getFetchSize() but it seems to always return 0 for my query.
THANKS in advance!
ResultSet testRS = Stmt.executeQuery(testStmt);
int size = testRS.getFetchSize();
System.out.println("size = " + size);
Wo Lay

To get the number of rows returned, you have to loop
through the result set, or do a "select count" (which
is more efficient since it doesn't have to pass the
rows across the network) ...Looping around the entire result set is not very performance efficient. Then agin if you use count (*) you actually execute an extra query.
The best thing you can do is:// assume res is your result set.
res.last();
int rows = res.getRow();This way you only have to execute one query and you don't really need to loop around the entire result set. Of course you will have to have a scrollable result set, if this is supported by your DB.
Hope that helped.
afotoglidis

How to find number of rows in a table

i have one table ,it contains millions of record,how can i know number of rows in that table without using count(*),
i tried in user_table ,for the column NUM_ROWS,but it is not showing number of rows,pls send me a solution for this.
regards,
singh

Ok, that only was to show simply that max option
might not an option to reduce execution time.Yes, but I/O variances have a tendency to really skew the observed elapsed execution time - making execution time alone a poor choice to determine what SQL will perform better than another.
Both MAX(ROWNUM) and COUNT(*) results in the same amount of I/O - as both uses the exact same execution plan, I/O wise. In this example, a FTS.
SQL> create table testtab nologging as select * from all_objects where rownum < 10001;
Table created.
-- warmed up the buffer cache with a couple of SELECTs against TESTAB in order
-- to discard PIOs from the results
SQL> set autotrace on
SQL> select count(*) from testtab;
COUNT(*)
10000
Execution Plan
Plan hash value: 2656308840
| Id | Operation | Name | Rows | Cost (%CPU)| Time |
| 0 | SELECT STATEMENT | | 1 | 35 (9)| 00:00:01 |
| 1 | SORT AGGREGATE | | 1 | | |
| 2 | TABLE ACCESS FULL| TESTTAB | 9262 | 35 (9)| 00:00:01 |
Note
- dynamic sampling used for this statement
Statistics
0 recursive calls
0 db block gets
131 consistent gets
0 physical reads
0 redo size
223 bytes sent via SQL*Net to client
238 bytes received via SQL*Net from client
2 SQL*Net roundtrips to/from client
0 sorts (memory)
0 sorts (disk)
1 rows processed
SQL> select max(rownum) from testtab;
MAX(ROWNUM)
10000
Execution Plan
Plan hash value: 2387991791
| Id | Operation | Name | Rows | Cost (%CPU)| Time |
| 0 | SELECT STATEMENT | | 1 | 35 (9)| 00:00:01 |
| 1 | SORT AGGREGATE | | 1 | | |
| 2 | COUNT | | | | |
| 3 | TABLE ACCESS FULL| TESTTAB | 9262 | 35 (9)| 00:00:01 |
Note
- dynamic sampling used for this statement
Statistics
0 recursive calls
0 db block gets
131 consistent gets
0 physical reads
0 redo size
225 bytes sent via SQL*Net to client
238 bytes received via SQL*Net from client
2 SQL*Net roundtrips to/from client
0 sorts (memory)
0 sorts (disk)
1 rows processed
So seeing that we have the exact same baseline for both queries, and that PIO does not influence the results, we time a 1000 executions of both.
SQL> declare
2 cnt number;
3 begin
4 for i in 1..1000
5 loop
6 select count(*) into cnt from testtab;
7 end loop;
8 end;
9 /
PL/SQL procedure successfully completed.
Elapsed: 00:00:03.19
SQL>
SQL> declare
2 cnt number;
3 begin
4 for i in 1..1000
5 loop
6 select max(rownum) into cnt from testtab;
7 end loop;
8 end;
9 /
PL/SQL procedure successfully completed.
Elapsed: 00:00:15.87
SQL>
This shows that what makes the MAX() more expensive is just that - determining the MAX(). For each row, Oracle has to call its internal MAX() function with two values - the current max result and the new value. This function then returns the new max value. This overhead per row adds up to a significant overhead in execution time - making the MAX() approach 5x slower than the COUNT() approach.

How to set number of rows in filters?

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for