Input Ready Queries in Workbook are taking lots of time to save

Hi Folks,
We have workbook which contains input ready queries. When user enter planning values and save the inputted values then it is taking more than 30 minutes to save the data to real time infocube. We have some VBA code on this workbook which is used for formatting and displaying pop-ups when user enters wrong values. Even though we have VBA it should not be taking 30 mins to save.
Please suggest what might have went wrong.
Thanks.
Regards,
Rik

Hi raj,
Thanks for your reply.
Please tell me with which BEx patch you have faced this issue.
We are on BI7.0 SP 19.
Thanks.
Regards,
Rik

Similar Messages

PO taking lot of time to save / generate.

Hi Guys,
I'm trying to create a new PO in my Quality ECC 6.0 system. The PO gets generated successfully and the Spool is also generated for the same, but the problem is that it was taking around 20 minutes earlier to save the PO ( Purchase order ).
Now its taking 5 minutes which is also a lot of time as compared to milli seconds which it should take.
There are 2 tables which remain locked till its saved and so we cannot proceed with the subsequent steps with the same PO
Please guide me what can be the reason for this and the correct solution to the same.
1. There is one BTC job in Stopped mode for 600118 seconds , could this be a reason.
2. There were around 78 users logged on when I generated the PO, which includes RFC & DIA, Its not many users but could this be a reason?
Please suggest at the earliest if possible how can I reduce this time and what can be the possible reasons for this High response time, my Integration Test is all held up cause of this
Regards,
Nitin

Hi Sreenivas
I checked the Transaction Profile -> Earlywatch.
For transaction ME21n the total Response time was 3381s around 56 minutes.
For my user the response time came out to be 647s around 10 minutes.
Please tell me how shall i reduce the time,
Regards,
Nitin

FB32 Taking lots of time while save(like 1 hour and more)

Hi All,
While i run FB32 its used for customer credit limit When i changes the limit and click on save button its stuck for hours and when i check through basis guy it was stuck in VBPA table i dont know whats worng with this standrerd T-CODE if any one can help me?
Tnx in Advance
Reg.
Lalit Paliwal

Hi raj,
Thanks for your reply.
Please tell me with which BEx patch you have faced this issue.
We are on BI7.0 SP 19.
Thanks.
Regards,
Rik

(Urgent) form taking lots of time to load and fetch the data

Hi
I have very serious problem of perfomance. I have installed oracle portal and configured it properly.
Now except form everything working perfectly. but only forms and links are taking lots of time to load
as well as for fetching data. I try to tune my sga and aslo findout hits and miss but i didnt find any
any problem for it. it is ok. can u help me pls. how can i make my form fast.
My operation system is NT.
version of database oracle 8.1.7
Oracle Portal 3.0.8
Thanks in advance
raju parmar
[email protected]
null

hi chetan
Lots of Thanks.
Now it working perfect.
Raju
<BLOCKQUOTE>quote:<HR>Originally posted by Chetan Kashyap ([email protected]):
The workaround is provided at: http://technet.oracle.com:89/ubb/Forum81/HTML/000395.html <HR></BLOCKQUOTE>
null

Unposted values are not display in input-ready queries - BRAIN 485

Hi experts,
After installing the support package level from "7.00 SP16" to "7.00 SP21" we meet an issue in our input-ready queries.
When we use the setting "Access Type for Result Values" according to master data in a query with time characteristics in columns, the system error BRAIN 485 occurs & no cells are not displayed.
Any idea ?
Thanks in advance,
Laurent

Hi raj,
Thanks for your reply.
Please tell me with which BEx patch you have faced this issue.
We are on BI7.0 SP 19.
Thanks.
Regards,
Rik

Convert to Formula using input ready queries

Hi,
Has anyone used converting to formula for input ready queries? When I use this for some reason all the values disappear in the rows and columns (including characteristic and key figure values). I would be interested to know if anyone has used this approach successfully.
Many thanks,

Also I want to convert this update routine 3.5 to work in 7
fill the internal table "MONITOR", to make monitor entries
IF COMM_STRUCTURE-costelmnt+2(1) = '7'.
    IF COMM_STRUCTURE-costelmnt+2(3) BETWEEN '700' AND '774'.
      RESULT = '70'.
    ELSEIF COMM_STRUCTURE-costelmnt+2(3) BETWEEN '775' AND '789'.
      RESULT = '75'.
    ELSEIF COMM_STRUCTURE-costelmnt+2(3) BETWEEN '790' AND '799'.
      RESULT = '79'.
    ENDIF.
ELSE.
    CASE COMM_STRUCTURE-costelmnt+2(1).
      WHEN '1'.
        RESULT = '10'.
      WHEN '2'.
        RESULT = '20'.
      WHEN '3'.
        RESULT = '30'.
      WHEN '4'.
        RESULT = '40'.
      WHEN '5'.
        RESULT = '50'.
      WHEN '6'.
        RESULT = '60'.
      WHEN '8'.
        RESULT = '80'.
      WHEN OTHERS.
        RESULT = '00'.
    ENDCASE.
ENDIF.
if the returncode is not equal zero, the result will not be updated
RETURNCODE = 0.
if abort is not equal zero, the update process will be canceled
ABORT = 0.
The source is KSTAR(costelement)

Function Module Extraction from KONV Table taking lot of time for extractio

Hi
I have a requirement wherein i need to get records from KONV Table (Conditions (Transaction Data) ). i need the data corresponding to Application (KAPPL) = 'F'.
For this i had written one function module but it is taking lot of time (@ 2.5 hrs) for fetching records as there are large number of records in KONV Table.
I am pasting the Function Module code for reference.
kindly guide me as to how the extraction performance can be improved.
Function Module Code:
FUNCTION ZBW_SHPMNT_COND.
""Local interface:
*" IMPORTING
*" VALUE(I_REQUNR) TYPE SBIWA_S_INTERFACE-REQUNR
*" VALUE(I_ISOURCE) TYPE SBIWA_S_INTERFACE-ISOURCE OPTIONAL
*" VALUE(I_MAXSIZE) TYPE SBIWA_S_INTERFACE-MAXSIZE OPTIONAL
*" VALUE(I_INITFLAG) TYPE SBIWA_S_INTERFACE-INITFLAG OPTIONAL
*" VALUE(I_UPDMODE) TYPE SBIWA_S_INTERFACE-UPDMODE OPTIONAL
*" VALUE(I_DATAPAKID) TYPE SBIWA_S_INTERFACE-DATAPAKID OPTIONAL
*" VALUE(I_PRIVATE_MODE) OPTIONAL
*" VALUE(I_CALLMODE) LIKE ROARCHD200-CALLMODE OPTIONAL
*" TABLES
*" I_T_SELECT TYPE SBIWA_T_SELECT OPTIONAL
*" I_T_FIELDS TYPE SBIWA_T_FIELDS OPTIONAL
*" E_T_DATA STRUCTURE ZBW_SHPMNT_COND OPTIONAL
*" E_T_SOURCE_STRUCTURE_NAME OPTIONAL
*" EXCEPTIONS
*" NO_MORE_DATA
*" ERROR_PASSED_TO_MESS_HANDLER
The input parameter I_DATAPAKID is not supported yet !
TABLES: KONV.
Auxiliary Selection criteria structure
DATA: l_s_select TYPE sbiwa_s_select.
Maximum number of lines for DB table
STATICS: l_maxsize TYPE sbiwa_s_interface-maxsize.
Maximum number of lines for DB table
STATICS: S_S_IF TYPE SRSC_S_IF_SIMPLE,
counter
 S_COUNTER_DATAPAKID LIKE SY-TABIX,
cursor
 S_CURSOR TYPE CURSOR.
Select ranges
RANGES: L_R_KNUMV FOR KONV-KNUMV,
 L_R_KSCHL FOR KONV-KSCHL,
 L_R_KDATU FOR KONV-KDATU.
Declaring internal tables
DATA : I_KONV LIKE KONV OCCURS 0 WITH HEADER LINE.
DATA : Begin of I_KONV occurs 0,
 MANDT LIKE konv-mandt,
 KNUMV LIKE konv-knumv,
 KPOSN LIKE konv-kposn,
 STUNR LIKE konv-stunr,
 ZAEHK LIKE konv-zaehk,
 KAPPL LIKE konv-kappl,
 KSCHL LIKE konv-kschl,
 KDATU LIKE konv-kdatu,
 KBETR LIKE konv-kbetr,
 WAERS LIKE konv-waers,
 END OF I_KONV.
Initialization mode (first call by SAPI) or data transfer mode
(following calls) ?
IF i_initflag = sbiwa_c_flag_on.
Initialization: check input parameters
 buffer input parameters
 prepare data selection
The input parameter I_DATAPAKID is not supported yet !
Invalid second initialization call -> error exit
 IF NOT g_flag_interface_initialized IS INITIAL.
 IF
 1 = 2.
 MESSAGE e008(r3).
 ENDIF.
 log_write 'E' "message type
 'R3' "message class
 '008' "message number
 ' ' "message variable 1
 ' '. "message variable 2
 RAISE error_passed_to_mess_handler.
 ENDIF.
Check InfoSource validity
 CASE i_isource.
 WHEN 'X'.
 WHEN 'Y'.
 WHEN 'Z'.
 WHEN OTHERS.
 IF 1 = 2. MESSAGE e009(r3). ENDIF.
 log_write 'E' "message type
 'R3' "message class
 '009' "message number
 i_isource "message variable 1
 ' '. "message variable 2
 RAISE error_passed_to_mess_handler.
 ENDCASE.
Check for supported update mode
 CASE i_updmode.
For full upload
 WHEN 'F'.
 WHEN 'D'.
 WHEN OTHERS.
 IF 1 = 2. MESSAGE e011(r3). ENDIF.
 log_write 'E' "message type
 'R3' "message class
 '011' "message number
 i_updmode "message variable 1
 ' '. "message variable 2
 RAISE error_passed_to_mess_handler.
 ENDCASE.
 APPEND LINES OF i_t_select TO g_t_select.
Fill parameter buffer for data extraction calls
 g_s_interface-requnr = i_requnr.
 g_s_interface-isource = i_isource.
 g_s_interface-maxsize = i_maxsize.
 g_s_interface-initflag = i_initflag.
 g_s_interface-updmode = i_updmode.
 g_s_interface-datapakid = i_datapakid.
 g_flag_interface_initialized = sbiwa_c_flag_on.
Fill field list table for an optimized select statement
(in case that there is no 1:1 relation between InfoSource fields
and database table fields this may be far from beeing trivial)
 APPEND LINES OF i_t_fields TO g_t_fields.
Interpretation of date selection for generic extraktion
 CALL FUNCTION 'RSA3_DATE_RANGE_CONVERT'
 TABLES
 i_t_select = g_t_select.
ELSE. "Initialization mode or data extraction ?
 CASE g_s_interface-updmode.
 WHEN 'F' OR 'C' OR 'I'.
First data package -> OPEN CURSOR
 IF g_counter_datapakid = 0.
 L_MAXSIZE = G_S_INTERFACE-MAXSIZE.
 LOOP AT g_t_select INTO l_s_select WHERE fieldnm = 'KNUMV'.
 MOVE-CORRESPONDING l_s_select TO l_r_knumv.
 APPEND l_r_knumv.
 ENDLOOP.
 LOOP AT g_t_select INTO l_s_select WHERE fieldnm = 'KSCHL'.
 MOVE-CORRESPONDING l_s_select TO l_r_kschl.
 APPEND l_r_kschl.
 ENDLOOP.
 Loop AT g_t_select INTO l_s_select WHERE fieldnm = 'KDATU'.
 MOVE-CORRESPONDING l_s_select TO l_r_kdatu.
 APPEND l_r_kdatu.
 ENDLOOP.
*In case of full upload
Fill field list table for an optimized select statement
(in case that there is no 1:1 relation between InfoSource fields
and database table fields this may be far from beeing trivial)
 APPEND LINES OF I_T_FIELDS TO S_S_IF-T_FIELDS.
 OPEN CURSOR G_CURSOR FOR
 SELECT MANDT
 KNUMV
 KPOSN
 STUNR
 ZAEHK
 KAPPL
 KSCHL
 KDATU
 KBETR
 WAERS
 FROM KONV
 WHERE KNUMV IN l_r_knumv
 AND KSCHL IN l_r_kschl
 AND KDATU IN l_r_kdatu
 AND KAPPL EQ 'F'.
 ENDIF.
 Refresh I_KONV.
 FETCH NEXT CURSOR G_CURSOR
 APPENDING CORRESPONDING FIELDS OF TABLE I_KONV
 PACKAGE SIZE S_S_IF-MAXSIZE.
 IF SY-SUBRC <> 0.
 CLOSE CURSOR G_CURSOR.
 RAISE NO_MORE_DATA.
 ENDIF.
 LOOP AT I_KONV.
 IF I_KONV-KAPPL EQ 'F'.
 CLEAR :E_T_DATA.
 E_T_DATA-MANDT = I_KONV-MANDT.
 E_T_DATA-KNUMV = I_KONV-KNUMV.
 E_T_DATA-KPOSN = I_KONV-KPOSN.
 E_T_DATA-STUNR = I_KONV-STUNR.
 E_T_DATA-ZAEHK = I_KONV-ZAEHK.
 E_T_DATA-KAPPL = I_KONV-KAPPL.
 E_T_DATA-KSCHL = I_KONV-KSCHL.
 E_T_DATA-KDATU = I_KONV-KDATU.
 E_T_DATA-KBETR = I_KONV-KBETR.
 E_T_DATA-WAERS = I_KONV-WAERS.
 APPEND E_T_DATA.
 ENDIF.
 ENDLOOP.
 g_counter_datapakid = g_counter_datapakid + 1.
ENDIF.
ENDFUNCTION.
Thanks in Advance
Regards
Swapnil.

Hi,
one option to investigate is to select the data with a condition on KNUMV (primary IDX).
Since shipment costs are store in VFKP I would investigate if all your F condition records are used in this table (field VFKP-KNUMV).
If this is the case then something like
SELECT *
FROM KONV
WHERE KNUMV IN (SELECT DISTINCT KNUMV FROM VFKP)
or
SELECT DISTINCT KNUMV
INTO CORRESPONDING FIELD OF <itab>
FROM VFKP
and then
SELECT *
FROM KONV
FOR ALL ENTRIES IN <itab>
WHERE...
will definitively speed it up.
hope this helps....
Olivier

Select query is taking lot of time to fetch data.....

Select query is taking lot of time to fetch data.
 SELECT algnum atanum abdatu abzeit abname abenum bmatnr bmaktx bqdatu bqzeit bvlenr bnlenr bvltyp bvlber b~vlpla
 bnltyp bnlber bnlpla bvsola b~vorga INTO TABLE it_final FROM ltak AS a
 INNER JOIN ltap AS b ON btanum EQ atanum AND algnum EQ blgnum
 WHERE a~lgnum = p_whno
 AND a~tanum IN s_tono
 AND a~bdatu IN s_tocd
 AND a~bzeit IN s_bzeit
 AND a~bname IN s_uname
 AND a~betyp = 'P'
 AND b~matnr IN s_mno
 AND b~vorga <> 'ST'.
Moderator message: Please Read before Posting in the Performance and Tuning Forum
Edited by: Thomas Zloch on Mar 27, 2011 12:05 PM

Hi Shiva,
I am using two more select queries with the same manner ....
here are the other two select query :
***************1************************
SELECT * APPENDING CORRESPONDING FIELDS OF TABLE tbl_summary
 FROM ztftelpt LEFT JOIN ztfzberep
 ON ztfzberep~gjahr = st_input-gjahr
 AND ztfzberep~poper = st_input-poper
 AND ztfzberepcntr = ztftelptrprctr
 WHERE rldnr = c_telstra_projects
 AND rrcty = c_actual
 AND rvers = c_ver_001
 AND rbukrs = st_input-bukrs
 AND racct = st_input-saknr
 AND ryear = st_input-gjahr
 and rzzlstar in r_lstar
 AND rpmax = c_max_period.
and the second one is
*************************2************************
SELECT * APPENDING CORRESPONDING FIELDS OF TABLE tbl_summary
 FROM ztftelnt LEFT JOIN ztfzberep
 ON ztfzberep~gjahr = st_input-gjahr
 AND ztfzberep~poper = st_input-poper
 AND ztfzberepcntr = ztftelntrprctr
 WHERE rldnr = c_telstra_networks
 AND rrcty = c_actual
 AND rvers = c_ver_001
 AND rbukrs = st_input-bukrs
 AND racct = st_input-saknr
 AND ryear = st_input-gjahr
 and rzzlstar in r_lstar
 AND rpmax = c_max_period.
for both the above table program is taking very less time .... although both the table used in above queries have similar amount of data. And i can not remove the APPENDING CORRESPONDING. because i have to append the data after fetching from the tables. if i will not use it will delete all the data fetched earlier.
Thanks on advanced......
Sourabh

Partition switching taking lots of time

I have a partitioned table. All the partitions of this table are mapped to a single filegroup.
When I am trying to switch partition, it is taking lots of time more than 5 mins for a single partition.
I can see that there is a file in the filegroup and its size is very high that is 234GB.
Can partition switching take more time due to file size?
or is there any other issue?
I need help in finding out what is the problem.
Thanks,

So you are running ALTER TABLE SWITCH? Check for blocking. The operation requires an Sch-M lock which means that it is blocked any query that is running, including queries using NOLOCK.
Erland Sommarskog, SQL Server MVP, [email protected]

Extractor taking lots of time.

hi experts,
we are using extractor 2LIS_13_VDKON to extract the data.
but its taking lots of time.how can i solve this problem.
any help appreciated.

Hi,
Have you done any enhancements(Append) to this DS.If so, make sure that code is performance optimistic.
Basically the setup table for 2LIS_13_VDKON will has the lot of data. For example, it holds at n avarage 10 records for each billing item record.
So also check system is uploading records to the New table of ODS or not.
With rgds,
Anil Kumar Sharma .P

Web-I Report taking lots of time to refresh when filters changed

In BO XI 3.1 Web-I report is taking lot of time to refresh when any changes are made in edit query mode on the filters.
When the query is runned for the first time it runs well, but if we make any changes in the filters pane, it is taking lots of time to refresh, and when we cancel the query web-i server is not releasing the server resources (CPU, Memory)
Did anyone face this kind of a problem, and resolved it.
Please let me know your thoughts
Thank you

Hi,
why do you need 100K rows in your reports? Is there a way to consolidate/aggregate your data on the database?
Comparing sqlplus and BOBJ is a little bit unfair. Let me explain you why:
sqlplus starts displaying data after the query returns the first results. I am sure that if you measure the time that sqlplus needs to display ALL rows, this should be way more than just 10 secs.
On the other hand BOBJ will display something as soon as the first page can be created. Depending on the way your report is structured, it may be the case that the WebI server should first get ALL rows in order to be able to display the first page of your report. This is for example the case if you let the total number of pages being displayed or if you display total sums already at the header of your report or if you have added a chart based on your data also in the header of your report. Of course, after the first call the report will be cached (and thus fast to be displayed) until you change again the parameters values for your query.
Since you do not display (or do you use this function in a variable or a formula, maybe?) the total number of pages in your report, I can only assume that you either trying to display total sums (or other kinds of aggregated values) or a chart in the first page of your report. Can you confirm this?
Regards,
Stratos

Browser is taking lot of time in loading forms

Hi
I am working on forms 10g..
when i am running my form.... the browser is loading applet and jar files.
After loading this it is taking lot of time to show forms...
Even I am clearing all my temp files frequently...
Why it is taking so much time??
What I have to do so that it can load forms in very least time??
Thanks

After loading this it is taking lot of time to show forms...This could be caused by a resource issue on the Client PC. By resource I mean available RAM, JRE memory settings, etc. It could also be a conflict between the Client OS, installed JRE and the Browser. Please tell us what the Client OS, JRE and Browser are as well as how much RAM is installed on the client pc.
Even I am clearing all my temp files frequently...Are you clearing the Browsers temporary internet files or the JRE's JAR cache? If the JRE's JAR cache then you are forcing the client to download the JAR each time you clear the JAR cache.
The slowness can also be caused by how large your FORMS files are and what you are doing in the Pre-Form and When-New-Form-Instance triggers. If you are performing numerous calls to the database or calling SYNCHRONIZE too many time in any of the triggers that fire when a Form initially loads then this will cause your form to load slower.
Hope this helps,
Craig B-)
If someone's response is helpful or correct, please mark it accordingly.

Delete taking lot of time

Hi
I have a delete statement..which is taking lot of time. If I select this scenerio only 500 records are coming. But delete is taking lot of time.
Please advise.
delete from whs_bi.TRACK_PLAY_EVENT a
where a.time_stamp >=to_date('5/27/2013','mm/dd/yyyy')
and a.time_stamp <to_date('5/28/2013','mm/dd/yyyy')Thanks in adv.
KPR

Lets check the wait events.
Open 2 sessions, 1 for running the update command and another for monitoring wait events. The session in which you want to run UPDATE, find the SID of that session ( SELECT userenv('SID') from dual ).
Now run the update in one session (of which we have already found the SID).
Run following query in another session
select w.sid sid,
 p.spid PID,
 w.event event,
 substr(s.username,1,10) username,
 substr(s.osuser, 1,10) osuser,
 w.state state,
 w.wait_time wait_time,
 w.seconds_in_wait wis,
 substr(w.p1text||' '||to_char(w.P1)||'-'||
 w.p2text||' '||to_char(w.P2)||'-'||
 w.p3text||' '||to_char(w.P3), 1, 45) P1_P2_P3_TEXT
from v$session_wait w, v$session s, v$process p
where s.sid=w.sid
and p.addr = s.paddr
and w.event not in ('SQL*Net message from client', 'pipe get')
and s.username is not null
and s.sid = &your_SIDWhile UPDATE is running in another session, run above query in second session for 5-6 times, with gap of (say) 10 seconds. If you can give us the output of monitoring query (from all 5-6 runs), that might throw more light on whats going under the hood.

Taking lot of time for loading

Hi,
We are loading data from HR to BI. Connection between HR and BI has been done recently. When I am trying to load data from HR to BI it taking lot of time--for example to load 5recs its taking 8hrs. Its same for every datasource. Should we change anything in settings to makes IDOCS work proper? Thanks

You have to isolate the part that is taking the time.
- Is R/3 extraction quick? (You can check with RSA3 and see how long does it take.)
- If R/3 extraction is slow, then is the selection using an index? How many records are there in the table / view?
- Is there a user exit? Is user exit slow?
You can find out using monitor screen:
- After R/3 extraction completed, how long did it take to insert into PSA?
- How long did it take in the update rules?
- How long did it take to activate?
Once you isolate the problem area, post your findings here and someone will help you.

Reading, comparing and appending two files is taking lot of time

public static void main(String args[])
     BufferedReader bSource = null;
     String sSource="";
     String sSourceData="";
     BufferedReader bDestination = null;
     String sDestination="";
     String sDestinationData="";
     try
          bSource = new BufferedReader(new FileReader("C:/TEMP/Source.map"));
          while((sSource = bSource.readLine()) != null)
               sSourceData+=sSource;
          bDestination = new BufferedReader(new FileReader("D:/TEMP/Destination.map"));
          while((sDestination = bDestination.readLine()) != null)
               sDestinationData+=sDestination;
     catch(IOException ioe)
          System.out.println(ioe.getMessage());
     finally
          try
               bSource.close();
               bDestination.close();
          catch(Exception e)
     if(sDestinationData.contains(sSourceData))
          fDestinationFlag=false;
     else
          fDestinationFlag=true;
     if(fDestinationFlag)
          BufferedReader br2 = null;
          BufferedWriter bw2 = null;
          try
               br2 = new BufferedReader(new FileReader("C:/TEMP/Source.map"));
               bw2 = new BufferedWriter(new FileWriter("D:/TEMP/Destination.map",true));
               while((line2 = br2.readLine()) != null)
                    bw2.write(line2);
                    bw2.newLine();
                    bw2.flush();
          catch(IOException ioe)
               System.out.println(ioe.getMessage());
          finally
               try
                    br2.close();
               catch(Exception e)
               try
                    bw2.close();
               catch(Exception e)
}I am comparing the contents of the two files Source.map (containing 3 lines) and Destination.map (containing 5000+ lines). The contents of the Source.map gets appended in the Destination.map only if it does not contain the same.
Now my program is doing the necessary, but it is taking lot of time. It's taking 1 min 26 seconds.
Could anyone please tell me what do I modify in may program to make it execute much faster.

1) Just compare the byte content - no need to convert to Strings.
2) Compare a block (say 256K bytes) at a time - no need to read the whole file into memory.
3) Compare the file lengths first - if they are different then the content cannot be the same.
4) When appending one file to the other, set the 'append' flag in the constructor of FileOutputStream to true.

Input Ready Queries in Workbook are taking lots of time to save

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for