Install MSI as restricted user?

I have set up an Zenworks desktop management agent MSI package which
installs fine when it is associated to a normal user (when set to force
run). If I want to do a force run when associated to a workstation
group it wont work, you have to double click the icon after it has been
cached. This isnt really how I would like it, I would like it to
automatically install.
1, can I get this to automatically install when associated to the
workstation?
If I have to get a user to click on the icon it will work fine for a
normal user but on certain users they have a restrictive policy which
says they are not allowed to install stuff so when they have the icon
popup in their NAL window (because its associated to that workstation)
and click it, it returns an error of 1625 (a restrictive policy is
stopping the installation)
2, Is there anyway around this?
Thanks
Total5

How could I copy to the c:\temp and then delete it? I am trying to do an
automatic install without any user intervention so I can push this out
over night, but I will definatley give the unsecured system user ago.
Cheers
Israel De Leon;2694744 Wrote:
> What if you first copy the ZFDAgent.msi to C:\Temp and
> then continue in installing locally. Then after the install,
> delete the msi from the Temp directory. You can also run it
> as an unsecured System User, which will temporarily
> allow the Admin rights.
>
>
> >>> On 4/5/2007 at 11:10 AM, in message
> <[email protected]_engineer.com>,
> Total5<[email protected]_engineer.com> wrote:
>
> Craig, thanks for the reply
>
> There are a few more bits of info since my last post.
>
> 1, the msi is on a NetWare share and yes it is a UNC path to it
>
> I have been trying a few changes whilst trying to get it running and
> itis set up now as....
>
> Assocaited to workstations and set to Force cache, Force run, and
> showin NAL
>
> It is set to pre install of schedule type none
>
> It has MSI properties for our middle tier address etc.......
>
> Everything else is standard settings. (the app I am doing is The
> ZfDagent)
>
> I have now had some luck installing this on our LAN. If I associatethis
> to a user with the settings mentioned it will install itself asexpected
> (without any user intervention)....great!
>
> But...
>
> If I want to associate it to workstations (which I do) it will cacheand
> then I have to run the NAL icon which will then distribute thepackage,
> really I could do with this happening automatically. I havesome users
> which have group policies applied to them, of which one ofthem is they
> are not allowed to install msi or exe's.
> So, if one of them users is on a workstation which needs the NAL
> iconclicking it just returns a MSI error code: 1625
>
> Now here comes the best bit......
>
> When this is done over the WAN I am getting different error codes
>
> These are associated to workstations
> 1, Installed as a restricted account - error code 1625
>
> 2, Installed as (admin user in NDS) restricted on the workstation
> -error 1612
>
> 3, Installed as (standard user in NDS) restricted on the workstation
> -error 1603
>
> 4, Installed as (admin user in NDS) admin on the workstation -
> error1612
>
> And this one, associated to admin user in NDS and admin on
> theworkstation - error 1625
>
> Hope any of this helps?????
>
>
> Craig Wilson;2671674 Wrote: > can you post the details of the MSI app
> you are trying to install?
> >
> > Is the MSI on a NetWare or Windows Share?
> > Are you using a UNC path to specify the path to the MSI install?
> >
> > Have you made other configuration changes to the app from the
> default
> > settings that may be noteworthy?
> >
> >
> > --
> > Craig Wilson - MCNE, MCSE, CCNA
> > Novell Support Forums Volunteer Sysop
> >
> > Novell does not officially monitor these forums.
> >
> > Suggestions/Opinions/Statements made by me are solely my own.
> > These thoughts may not be shared either Novell or any rational
> human.
> >
> > "Total5" <[email protected]_engineer.com> wrote in message
> > news:[email protected]_engineer.com...
> > >
> > > I have set up an Zenworks desktop management agent MSI package
> which
> > > installs fine when it is associated to a normal user (when set to>
> force
> > > run). If I want to do a force run when associated to a workstation
> > > group it wont work, you have to double click the icon after it has>
> been
> > > cached. This isnt really how I would like it, I would like it to
> > > automatically install.
> > >
> > > 1, can I get this to automatically install when associated to the
> > > workstation?
> > >
> > > If I have to get a user to click on the icon it will work fine for
> a
> > > normal user but on certain users they have a restrictive policy>
> which
> > > says they are not allowed to install stuff so when they have the>
> icon
> > > popup in their NAL window (because its associated to that>
> workstation)
> > > and click it, it returns an error of 1625 (a restrictive policy is
> > > stopping the installation)
> > >
> > > 2, Is there anyway around this?
> > >
> > > Thanks
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Total5-- Total5
Total5

Similar Messages

Force Adobe Shockwave updates to install as a restricted user:

For security purposes I'm investigating what it would take to force Adobe Shockwave Player updates to run under a restricted user account in a corporate environment. I was hoping for a solution similar to Adobe Flash where you could create a scheduled task to run the update as the SYSTEM account but shockwave seems to behave a little differently than Flash.
I've also read that you can enable/disable auto updates by modifying the registry keys "HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Wow6432Node\Macromedia\Shockwave 10\AutoUpdate" and "HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Wow6432Node\Adobe\Shockwave 12\AutoUpdate", however, when I modify these parameters they are not reflected when you right click on the shockwave video player -> select properties -> and then check/uncheck the update options. Am I missing something here?
I have been testing with a somewhat older version of Shockwave to see if it would ever update to the newest version but I can't see where it ever updates. Have others run into this issue? How do you keep shockwave up to date in your corporate environment?

You might want to look at implementing Munki. Munki is mainly intended as a means of distributing both initial Application installs, but also updates for those applications, e.g. Microsoft Office. It can however also automate installing Apple Software Updates. Importantly it does not require the end user to ever enter any administrator details to allow these updates to be installed.
See https://code.google.com/p/munki/wiki/AppleSoftwareUpdatesWithMunki
(Munki is free.)

How do I restrict users from installing applications?

Or more specifically, yahoo messenger. I can't seem to figure this one out. Two user settings on our machines (public and admin), public does not have admin priveleges, so cannot make modifications like installing applications, but someone seems to keep installing messenger all the same. I investigated and figured out that it seems like when logged onto the public account, one can still install applications in their user/applications folder without needing to authenticate. or maybe Yahoo Messenger doesn't read as an application, so it doesn't need authetication? I am trying to make it so no one can install any application without admin priveleges.

"Parental Controls" works on a "white list" principle, so if an app isn't available in the "Accounts" pref pane, it shouldn't be accessible for the "managed" user because the default is to deny everything not on the list.
But also be aware that the type of "Parental Controls" you have selected may affect the user's ability to use a given programme. For example, if the "Allow supporting programmes" checkbox is selected, it may be possible to launch indirectly a programme that hasn't been approved explicitly.
Also, note that a "Simple Finder" account doesn't (and isn't intended to) restrict application access at all, whereas a "Some Limits" account does.
And as "Keith Gaboury1" points out, if a given service allows access through a web interface, restriction of a programme on the local computer won't have any effect.
"Parental Controls" are somewhat effective in preventing users from using unauthorized programmes, but as far as preventing the installation of apps, that is something that would be fairly difficult to do if the user is to have a functional account. If a user can save files to a directory (such as their home folder or "/Users/Shared" or the "admin" user's "Drop Box"), it would be possible for them to install an application there. There are ways of preventing executables in the user's own "home" from functioning, but then they could always run an app from a CD or a flash drive or a disk image instead (I'm not sure how to block those). So the "white list" approach of controlling application use (as opposed to installation) is probably the best compromise.

Microsoft Word Has Not Been Installed for the Current User

Hi, everybody
I'm just starting our attempt to put together ZfD app packages for MS Office 2007. I've tried 2 different route with poor results for each. I'm looking for guidance and suggestions and, hey really, the simple final solution. :)
Objectives: Each app package will install locally one of the Office apps (e.g., Word) if it is not installed and then launch it, otherwise it will launch it. It gets installed locally to the C: drive using all the MS default choices, but runs from the desktop ZEN/NAL shortcut. All desktops are XP, not Vista or W7.
Routes tried and failed...
1) Simple app, uses distribution and run scripts to figure out if already installed, then installs using network shared drive and config.xml file for just the one app. The result ought to work -- no particular error in the package, those are fixed -- but what happens is something different each time with the MS setup.exe, and it never does complete without its own error (various and different each time). So, this appears to be completely unreliable because launching MS's setup.exe from a simple app is unpredictable and incomplete.
2) Snapshot of a successful setup.exe and config.xml install. This ALMOST works... well it does in fact work but the snapshotted app gives an error once it finishes launching -- "Microsoft Word Has Not Been Installed for the Current User" -- and exits. From the research I've done on this message, the MS program sees the "wrong" Windows profile on the destination environment, compared to that in the snapshot, and figures it's now been installed from a bootleg copy of Office 2007.
At this stage all I can think of is expletives. We've paid for everything, I've followed all the usual and customary steps, played by the rules, been polite (and also used the necessary computer swear words), and now I just want to insult everyone in Microsoft's marketing department for ruining everyone's life yet again. Can't we just do this, is it too much to ask!?!
Please help me. What is really going to work for distributing and maintaining Office 2007 apps using our ZfD environment? ALL USEFUL SUGGESTIONS WELCOME. Thank you. Bless you.
-Kent S.
Be strong as a ship and wise as a whale

These questions are really best in the Microsoft Office Forums.
These are MS Office Questions not ZEN Questions.
Novell did not design Microsoft's Office Install.
I have nothing against snapshots, but it does not work great with the Office
installs, which you yourself know since you are posting here with problems
based on that.
And your other method you are trying with the break out is not working well.
We also know that from experience.
We can tell you that the way most people install it and the way most people
succeed doing it, is by doing it the way recommended and designed by
Microsoft.
ZEN does that just fine.
Craig Wilson - MCNE, MCSE, CCNA
Novell Knowledge Partner
Novell does not officially monitor these forums.
Suggestions/Opinions/Statements made by me are solely my own.
These thoughts may not be shared by either Novell or any rational human.
"KentFSmith" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
>
> Thank you, Grimlock (-Grimlock?-)
>
> Through a google search I encountered a very close suggestion, and the
> poster said they couldn't remember the name of a MS utility but that
> there was one that would break out the individual MSIs from the Office
> 2007 setup.exe bundle. The dependent app appears to be a simple and
> possibly elegant solution, but without a good way to break out the MSIs
> I don't see how to do anything other than with a config.xml ('Config.xml
> file in the 2007 Office system'
> (http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/l.../cc179195.aspx)).
>
> Do you know of that utility and where I can find it?
>
> There is a lot of history here now of just doing the individual
> applications. Everyone gets Word and Excel, but much fewer get
> PowerPoint and Access. All other reasons aside, a compelling one is the
> reduced number of help calls to the Help Desk here. Occasionally we
> also just run the whole Office install for someone who needs some of the
> odd utilities, but that is easily cost-justifiable for us to break them
> out as exceptions. Otherwise, we focus 90% of our support on just Word
> and Excel and it pays off nicely.
>
> If we switch to putting full Office 2007 on all PCs then there may be a
> better approach that include other tools than ZfD, such as the fact that
> we replace 1/3 of all PCs in the organization each year (so that no
> hardware is more than 3 years "behind"). We could put 1/3 of all Office
> 2007 installs into the new PC image. But we still need to support all
> the use of the apps after the install, so ZfD MUST work well, it simply
> MUST work well or we're screwed, to use the vernacular. Also, just
> switching from what we've been doing for years -- single app orientation
> -- means introducing new-ish issues that have to discover and explain to
> our comrades, and to adjust our orientation with unknown future costs.
>
> But that may end up being the simplest adequate solution. And that's
> what I want.
>
> -K
>
> grimlock;1883526 Wrote:
>> Craig Wilson wrote:
>> > You should really focus on #1.
>> > Snapshot is not the way to go.
>> >
>> > Details about what is Not working or what random behavior may help
>> folks.
>> > Ask in the MS forums may help too. dont' mention zenworks.
>> > Just say you are installing as Administrator from a share and getting
>> these
>> > errors.
>> >
>> > While not 100% accurate, it should be good enough to get some good
>> feedback.
>> >
>>
>> Nor is installing 1 app at a time. Install the whole suite, have an
>> icon for each app that runs the exe for that app with a dependency on
>> the another app that points to the installer msi.
>>
>> If any user runs any app, it will run if the executable is there
>> (meaning it's been installed). If the executable is not there then it
>> calls the dependent application (the installer app) and installs it,
>> and
>> then runs it.
>
>
> --
> KentFSmith
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> KentFSmith's Profile: http://forums.novell.com/member.php?userid=2927
> View this thread: http://forums.novell.com/showthread.php?t=391573
>
>

[事例紹介]Install MSI payload failed with error: 110 - 指定されたデバイスまたはファイルを開けません.

このようなインストールトラブルの解決事例がありましたのでご紹介します。
【問題点】
CS5.ｘ Windows 版インストール時、「インストールに問題があります Exit Code:7」エラーが発生。
エラーサマリーには以下のエラーが含まれていました。
【エラーサマリー抜粋】
----------- Payload: {08D2E121-7F6A-43EB-97FD-629B44903403} Microsoft_VC90_CRT_x86 1.0.0.0 -----------
ERROR: 指定されたデバイスまたはファイルを開けません。
ERROR: Install MSI payload failed with error: 110 - 指定されたデバイスまたはファイルを開けません。
MSI Error message: 指定されたデバイスまたはファイルを開けません。
【解決方法】
これはMSI（Windows Installer）に関するエラーメッセージです。
Windows Installer を修復することで解決しました。
手順については以下を参照してください。
■Windows Installer の修復によるインストールトラブル対処方法（Windows）
http://kb2.adobe.com/jp/cps/890/cpsid_89088.html?sdid=JSRPP
この方法で解決しなかった、という方がいらっしゃいましたら、エラーサマリーをぜひ投稿してください。
なお、この解決方法は以下の文書にも掲載されています。
■「インストールに問題があります」エラーの対処方法（Creative Suite 5, 5.5）
http://kb2.adobe.com/jp/cps/894/cpsid_89463.html?sdid=JSRPP

The Error 1603 usually occurs due to insufficient privileges.
Try the following steps:
> Enable the hidden Admin Account on Windows 7 ( Ref : http://www.howtogeek.com/howto/windows-vista/enable-the-hidden-administrator-account-on-wi ndows-vista/ )
> Disable all Non-Microsoft Startup Services. (Ref : http://helpx.adobe.com/x-productkb/global/disable-startup-items-services-windows.html )
> Disable all the Antivirus softwares like CA, Norton,Mc Afee etc. temporarily from the computer.
Reboot and try installing in the new enabled Admin user account and check.
Regards,
Rave

IE11 restricted users opens links in new window instead new tab

Hello,
Have a problem. All restricted users, on several machines when try to open link in new tab, link opens in new window instead new tab. Pressing ctrl+K or ctrl+T works fine. Resetting browser setting didn't help. Red cross near resetting user customizations.
Administrators don't have this problem. OS: Windows 7 x64 + IE 11. Machine belongs to workgroup. All available updates are installed. Is there any decision?
Thanks

Hi,
This might be related with the UAC settings. See
this thread.
How are the restriction of the users configured here?
Best regards
Michael Shao
TechNet Community Support

Problems with restricted users, urgent help needed

Greetings,
I represent a company called eChiron, a service desk company for several client companies.
We have a client company that has bought between 100 to 200 cell phones, all Nokia 6233. They all run client PCs with windows XP SP2 and are all restricted users (mandatory).
We've installed 2 nokia PC suites as pilot prior to mass deploying and have both failed to run correctly.
They execute correctly if the user is changed to local admin (being that the method of instalation), but when reverting back to restricted user the application doesn't work correctly.
It starts and (apparently) conects to the mobile phone trough bluetooth interface. In reality the conectivity is nonexistent (we've tested by turning off the mobile phone...) and the connection log reports "conection failed".
As i mentioned before, it's not an hardware fault since it all works correctly in admin mode.
Thanks in advance for any possible help,
J
Edit: the installed version is the latest (17/december) and the language is portuguese.
Message Edited by echiron on 17-Dec-2007 02:27 PM

This has always been a limitation in PC suite, I assume you've tried the latest version 6.85?
You may want to take a look at the link below, it may suit your needs better.
http://www.businesssoftware.nokia.com/pc_suite_downloads.php

Install MSI payload failed with error: 1603

I had problems on upgrades got message to run Acrobat clean tool
I did it then I run new installation from Creative Cloud
failed installation gave me the following error and to contact adobe support. What I have to do?
Exit Code: 7
Please see specific errors below for troubleshooting. For example, ERROR:
-------------------------------------- Summary --------------------------------------
- 0 fatal error(s), 3 error(s)
----------- Payload: Acrobat Professional 11.0.0.0 {23D3F585-AE29-4670-8E3E-64A0EFB29240} -----------
ERROR: Impossibile installare il servizio "Adobe Acrobat Update Service" (AdobeARMservice). Assicurarsi di disporre di privilegi sufficienti per l'installazione dei servizi di sistema.
ERROR: Install MSI payload failed with error: 1603 - Errore irreversibile durante l'installazione.
MSI Error message: Impossibile installare il servizio "Adobe Acrobat Update Service" (AdobeARMservice). Assicurarsi di disporre di privilegi sufficienti per l'installazione dei servizi di sistema.
ERROR: Third party payload installer AcroPro.msi failed with exit code: 1603

The Error 1603 usually occurs due to insufficient privileges.
Try the following steps:
> Enable the hidden Admin Account on Windows 7 ( Ref : http://www.howtogeek.com/howto/windows-vista/enable-the-hidden-administrator-account-on-wi ndows-vista/ )
> Disable all Non-Microsoft Startup Services. (Ref : http://helpx.adobe.com/x-productkb/global/disable-startup-items-services-windows.html )
> Disable all the Antivirus softwares like CA, Norton,Mc Afee etc. temporarily from the computer.
Reboot and try installing in the new enabled Admin user account and check.
Regards,
Rave

GW8 HP1 Windows client - problems with restricted users

I've reproduced these on a few clean WinXP and Windows 2003 systems in both a GW 7.0.3 upgrade scenario and fresh install of GW 8 HP1 scenario. I am curious if anyone else has been able to reproduce these:
- Client ignores DefaultIPAddress and DefaultIPPort values for non-administrative users. If these are defined under HKEY_CURRENT_MACHINE\Software\Novell\GroupWise by the installer's setup.cfg, they are ignored when the user who is logged in is a non-administrative user. Administrative user profiles correctly pull these values but non-administrative users always try ngwnameserver. If the user profile is upgraded to an admin profile, then they start reading DefaultIPAddress and DefaultIPPort. This does not seem to be a permissions problem on the reg. keys themselves, as the values can be read by regedit when logged in as the user.
- Client does not setup MAPI profiles for the Address Book for a non-administrative user. Windows Messaging configuration dialog opens if you try to use the Address Book. If the user account is upgraded to an admin, then the next GW startup will configure the profile correctly. Downgrading the user to a non-admin at that point allows the Address Book to continue to function.
This also does not seem to be a permission problem writing to the MAPI profiles registry keys under HKCU\Software\Microsoft\Windows NT\Current Version\Windows Messaging Subsystem. I can manually import the correct keys when logged in as the restricted user and then the Address Book works without issue.
It does not look like in both cases the GW client even attempts to access the registry keys in question as per RegMon.
GW 7.0.3 client on the same equipment does not have a problem.
Any thoughts? Any other issues people have seen running GW 8 as a non-administrative user?

Originally Posted by elarsson
I've reproduced these on a few clean WinXP and Windows 2003 systems in both a GW 7.0.3 upgrade scenario and fresh install of GW 8 HP1 scenario. I am curious if anyone else has been able to reproduce these:
- Client ignores DefaultIPAddress and DefaultIPPort values for non-administrative users. If these are defined under HKEY_CURRENT_MACHINE\Software\Novell\GroupWise by the installer's setup.cfg, they are ignored when the user who is logged in is a non-administrative user. Administrative user profiles correctly pull these values but non-administrative users always try ngwnameserver. If the user profile is upgraded to an admin profile, then they start reading DefaultIPAddress and DefaultIPPort. This does not seem to be a permissions problem on the reg. keys themselves, as the values can be read by regedit when logged in as the user.
- Client does not setup MAPI profiles for the Address Book for a non-administrative user. Windows Messaging configuration dialog opens if you try to use the Address Book. If the user account is upgraded to an admin, then the next GW startup will configure the profile correctly. Downgrading the user to a non-admin at that point allows the Address Book to continue to function.
This also does not seem to be a permission problem writing to the MAPI profiles registry keys under HKCU\Software\Microsoft\Windows NT\Current Version\Windows Messaging Subsystem. I can manually import the correct keys when logged in as the restricted user and then the Address Book works without issue.
It does not look like in both cases the GW client even attempts to access the registry keys in question as per RegMon.
GW 7.0.3 client on the same equipment does not have a problem.
Any thoughts? Any other issues people have seen running GW 8 as a non-administrative user?
I've reproduced this now with the FCS GW 8 client as well.
Also a point of clarification on the MAPI profiles -- in an upgrade scenario from GW 7 client, if the user profile previosuly existed on the machine and had the MAPI settings configured by the GW 7 client, then they will work fine with GW 8. The issue seems to only occur with new user profiles, logging into a machine as a non-administrative user. The GW 8 client does not create the proper registry keys for the MAPI profile under HKEY_CURRENT_USER and the Address Book does not function.

DUN Bluetooth connection to PocketPC, Vista and restricted user rights

Hallo,
I've successfully established a DUN connection to my Pocket WM5-based QTEK 9100 smartphone via Bluetooth and the Toshiba Stack, latest version. My notebook is a X200-21D with Vista Home Premium.
Everything works well as far as I don't change the Vista user to an user with restricted rights, for the user with Administrator rights the Bluetooth Utility created a new DUN connection and a new modem with a virtual COM port. The user with the restricted rights isn't allowed to setup a new connection but this is necessary to connect to the smartphone with the Bluetooth Utility. On the administrative account the radio button to allow the connection to be dialed from other users is disabled and greyed out, so there is now way to open it for other users.
How can I setup an Bluetooth DUN connection for a user with restricted rights ?
Thank you in advance !

Should the Restricted user use the same DUN configuration like the Admin ?
If so, then you can use "Bluetooth Settings-> Custom Mode". This allows you to
select the "33600 Standard Modem" from the list which was configured before by
the Admin. So every DUN which was configured by the Admin can be used by the
Restricted user with this method. Restricted users can not install hardware, so
if the Admin has not installed a modem, then also the Restricted user can not use it.
The Admin can pre-install a modem with the Bluetooth stack installation.
This is useful if the restricted user should be able to configure a DUN connections
with advanced modem settings which are not used by the Admin.
This should be possible if the "as.ini" file has a line "MODEMINST = 1"

Restrict Users from saving files on Local PC but forced to Network Shared Location

Hi,
We have the Domain in Windows 2003 Standard.
How can I restrict users from saving files in their Local PC?
Also, need to forced them to save the files in Network Location with permissions...
Thanks.
~CoolPra~

Hi,
You can create a file screen to prevent users from saving files on a certain volume. File screens are used to block specific types of files from being saved on a volume or in a folder tree. A file screen affects all folders in the designated path. You need
to update the server to Windows Server 2003 R2 to install the File Server Resource Manager.
File Screening Management
http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/cc772675(v=ws.10).aspx
Best Regards,
Mandy
We
are trying to better understand customer views on social support experience, so your participation in this
interview project would be greatly appreciated if you have time.
Thanks for helping make community forums a great place.

Error: Install MSI Payload failed with error: 1635 / ERROR. DW050: - Acorbat Prof. Install failen

Hi all
I have bought Adobe Creative Suite 6, Master collection on DVD (with various Adobe-Products
Iwork with windows XP (SP3, German)
The error-log shows various WARNINGS and 2 Errors to Adobe Professional 10.0.0.0
- Install MSI payload failed with error: 1635 -"Das Patchpaket konnte nicht geöffnet werden. Stellen Sie sicher, dass das Patchpaket vorhanden ist und das Sie darauf zugreifen können oder wenden Sie sich an den Hersteller".
-> The patch-packet can't be opened. Make shure that the patch-packet is available and you can access it or contact the vendor"
- ERROR: DW050: Acrobat Professiona: Install failed
Adobe Professional was not installed, the other products are installed now
Very nice..
What can i do now?
Help please

Hi Mylenium
Thanks for your fast replay, but...
=> Do i have to deinstall the Software first (windows - software)?
In the description to the tools is explicitly a note that the tools should not be used with the creative suite (see below):
=> Is that a wrong information?
Thanks
IMPORTANT: THIS TOOL IS NOT FOR USE WITH ANY CREATIVE SUITE PRODUCTS INCLUDING SUITES THAT CONTAIN ACROBAT. IT CAN ONLY BE USED WITH STANDALONE VERSIONS OF ACROBAT AND ADOBE READER.
English
Download Adobe Reader and Acrobat Cleaner Tool for Windows (ZIP, 702 KB)
User Instructions
Follow either the User Interface Workflow or the Command Line Usage instructions below to use the Adobe Reader and Acrobat Cleaner Tool. Once you are done, please send us your comments and let us know about your experience.
User Interface Workflow
Do not proceed if you installed Acrobat or Reader as part of Creative Suite. This tool can only be used with standalone versions of Acrobat and Reader.

ERROR: Install MSI payload failed with error: 1612 - Die Installationsquelle ...

Hi,
wollte unter win7/64, CS5.5, Production Suite, Encore aufrufen. Wunderte mich, wieso nicht installiert. Dachte nämlich, ich hätte "damals" alle Komponenten installiert.
Also die Setup-Routine des Images (nicht die Trial-Version -- oder doch eine Trial benutzt? Mist, kann ich grad nicht genau nachvollziehen...) nochmals aufgerufen, um Encore noch zu installieren, bekomme jedoch Fehlermeldung. In Log-File dieser Hinweis:
ERROR: Install MSI payload failed with error: 1612 - Die Installationsquelle für dieses Produkt ist nicht verfügbar. Stellen Sie sicher, dass die Quelle vorhanden ist und Sie Zugriff darauf haben.
Glaube mich nun erinnern zu können, dass dies auch bei der Erstinstallation auftrat, ich mich jedoch nicht mehr drum gekümmert hatte.
Da ich aber alle anderen Komponenten installieren konnte, nur Encore nicht klappt -- Frage: könnte wirklich eine Datei des Images defekt oder fehlend sein?
Oder ich warte einfach ab, bis endlich CS6 im Haus ist und dann die Probleme von vorne beginnen

Hi Mylenium
Thanks for your fast replay, but...
=> Do i have to deinstall the Software first (windows - software)?
In the description to the tools is explicitly a note that the tools should not be used with the creative suite (see below):
=> Is that a wrong information?
Thanks
IMPORTANT: THIS TOOL IS NOT FOR USE WITH ANY CREATIVE SUITE PRODUCTS INCLUDING SUITES THAT CONTAIN ACROBAT. IT CAN ONLY BE USED WITH STANDALONE VERSIONS OF ACROBAT AND ADOBE READER.
English
Download Adobe Reader and Acrobat Cleaner Tool for Windows (ZIP, 702 KB)
User Instructions
Follow either the User Interface Workflow or the Command Line Usage instructions below to use the Adobe Reader and Acrobat Cleaner Tool. Once you are done, please send us your comments and let us know about your experience.
User Interface Workflow
Do not proceed if you installed Acrobat or Reader as part of Creative Suite. This tool can only be used with standalone versions of Acrobat and Reader.

Solution: WinXP Restricted users connecting to Oracle

For a while we've been having the problem that with a default install of the Oracle Client (in our case 9.2 - Not sure if the problem exists with earlier versions), restricted users on WinXP (possibly 2K too, I've not been able to test it) cannot connect to any server because they cannot see the oracle client files. For some reason, the oracle client install sets strange permissions that mean only administrators can access the client files. Worse still, any attempt to reset the permissions on the ORACLE_HOME directory and propagate them down all the sub directories always fails with Permission Denied (even for admins?!?!?!). Even attempting to take ownership fails.
Anyway, we've found a solution:
Logged in as an admin, we copied the c:\oracle\Ora92 directory from a fresh install of the oracle client on WinXP to a machine with Fat32 (Win98) - Thereby removing all permissions from the files. We then renamed the old Oracle directory on the WinXP PC, created a new one and copied back the Ora92 directory from the Win98 PC - This resulted in the c:\Oracle directory and all sub directories having default permissions, specifically Read and Execute to all users and Full to admins. We also reset the permission on all sub-directories of c:\program files\oracle to those of c:\program files\oracle ( Using the "Reset permission on all child objects and enable propagation of inheritable permissions" check box in windows advanced security ).
The end result is that restricted users can now access the necessary oracle client files, but don't have permission to alter them (which prevents them changing any connection parameters).
The problem still remains that the installer creates strange permissions on files in the Oracle Home directory, but at least there is a workaround until Oracle sorts out the installer.
Anyone think of a better way to get the same result?

if you set the restricted users into the power users group you may be asking for other troubles as these users will then have update permissions to most files on the system, including those files in the winnt folder.
it is not clear to me whether you are unable to set the file permissions to read/write access, or whether you are able to do so but that after you do so the users still get errors launching the client. it sounds like the solution to your problem may have been setting the read/write access in the \program files\oracle folder.
you should make sure you install oracle when you are logged in as administrator. note that this is different than doing the install while logged in as user "X", where "X" is a member of the administrator group.
if after doing the install as administrator you still have problems, i would recommend that you turn on auditing, reboot the system, launch the client as a restricted user, and then review the event log to see what file(s) are being denied access.
to set up auditing, go to start->programs->administrative tools->local security policy. select local policies, then audit policies. set "audit object access" to failure. then go to my computer, right click on C:, select properties, then the security tab. click on the advanced button, then the auditing tab. select the "everyone" group, then click ok. in the next window, check all boxes in the "failed" column. click ok.
don't forget to reverse the process and turn off auditing once you have found the problem files and set the necessary permissions.

MSI KT4V-L User Review.

MSI KT4V-L User Review.
The price of the mother board suprised me for what it was it seemd very cheep only £81 anyway,
I removed my old board and started to set the KT4V-L up and found it easyer than any other motherboard i have used.
I did not have to ajust any jumpers on the mainboard because everythign is in the bios also booting is a lot faster because
the boot is bypassed you now hit F11 and select your boot device. After i had set the bios to my preferd settings i
installed windows, the instalation went smooth and fast, When i was into Windows (XP) and had installed the motherboardes
drivers you really notice the speed of the board and the VIA KT400 chipset and is also very very stable, basicly this
motherboard is to good the only problems i found are with the Onbored Lan and the AC97 Audio. The Onbored Lan is good but
with my router when i need to restart it i have to unplug the system because when shut down the Lan is still active but i
also tested it with no router connected and had the same problem sometimes on first boot the net wont work but you can just
reboot and its fine also there is a Flash avalable for the lan option but i dont know if this prblem is in it. The sound
is very good but if you dont install windows and the drivers in a serten way the sound may not work, this is how i did mine.
Windows XP
Chipset Drivers
Service Pack *Latest*
Sound Drivers
USB 2.0
DirectX *latest*
Graphix
Mouse
Lan
(Note!) Even though after installing some drivers it does not ask to reboot it is best to!
And mine works fine
All in this motherboard is superb and as i used a MSI motherboard *MS-6340* for 2 years befor this upgrade all i am seeing
is good things well done MSI and keep up the good work.
Slay3r
© Slay3r.com

http://www.msi.com.tw/program/support/bios/bos/spt_bos_detail.php?UID=362%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20&NAME=MS-6712
turn off wake on lan and any others you dont use

Install MSI as restricted user?

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for