Installation Without Bundlet JRE

Hi,
i want to install JSC but it sends me that it can not start graphical mode.
i already know what the problem is:
i'm installing JSC in my linux machine, but it java has a bug about xde, and xinerama,
i already found a workaround for this, java and my graphical apps works just fine.
but at the moment of installation JSC tries to install his own copy of the JRE(which has no workaround aplied on it) so, i wonder how to install JSC with my working JDK/JRE.
is there any command line parameter or something where i can specify the path to an already installed java?
any help would be much apreciated!
Regards.

Hi,
I don't know about that application server, but many application servers need a JDK in order to run. The JDK is used to compile jsp-pages etc.
/Kaj

Similar Messages

  • Launching JVM without installing JRE

    Can you, somehow, launch a java application (provided in a jar file) without having the client to install the JRE?
    I don't mean to compile my java program into native code (if ever possible).
    I'd like to be able to launch a "live" version of JVM which will then run my java application.
    I think java IDEs like netbeans, work like that. They can launch without a JRE installed on the system since they rely on their own internal one to run.
    I guess they start running in a native way and then activate their internal VM which will manage the real application.
    Am I correct? Can you do that.
    Thanks in advance

    Can you, somehow, launch a java application (provided
    in a jar file) without having the client to install
    the JRE?
    I don't mean to compile my java program into
    native code (if ever possible).
    I'd like to be able to launch a "live" version of JVM
    which will then run my java application.To execute a .class file there has to be a JVM present. If you independently set and/or manage the execution path and the classpath the only "installation" required is that the JVM be present. The JVM that's internal to the SDK/JDK and totally contained within the JAVA_HOME\jre directory is like this - there are no external references made to it. For instance, if you use a command like this:
    C:\Program Files\Java\jdk1.5.0_01\bin\java.exe -classpath <whatever> <yourclass>
    Then the only requirement is that a JRE has a java.exe at that location.
    I think java IDEs like netbeans, work like that.No, they all require that a JRE already be present.
    They can launch without a JRE installed on the system
    since they rely on their own internal one to run.
    I guess they start running in a native way and then
    activate their internal VM which will manage the real
    application.
    Am I correct? Can you do that.
    Thanks in advance

  • Running java application without installing JRE

    We try to run Java application without installing JRE, by copying java.exe (and other JRE files) together with our jar file. This does not work.
    Can it be solved?

    Can you elaborate on the steps to create a java
    application without installing JRE.
    Regards,
    padmaPadma,
    The solution is to deploy my JAR together with JRE files, without running standard JRE installation. This makes possible to simply ensure that my JAR will run with THIS SPECIFIC JRE. This is important from QA point of view. Also, installation of my application does not change configuration of JVMs on the computer.
    The solved problem:
    Standard JRE installation may change the default JRE for many Java applets and application on computer. Changing version JRE may lead to some programs misbehaviour (JRE backward compatibility does not always work and different Java versions not always live together well). Thus, some IT departments are very nervous about JRE version change.
    Hope, this explains my problem and the solution.

  • How to package JavaFX 2 without boundle JRE

    Hi
    As the title, it's very useful to package java application as native installer. But the problem is, the package size is more than 50MB even my code is only 3 lines.
    If I already installed jre or jdk in my OS, can I choose to package without JRE?
    Regards,
    Hua Jie

    Wang, apparently you can create a native installer without a packaged Java runtime.
    I've never tried it, so you would have to try it and see.  (some of the items on the JavaFX deployment blog either weren't implemented or took a long time to implement).  Definitely use a recent JavaFX version if you try this (either the latest Java 7 release or - if that doesn't work - the most recent Java 8 pre-release).
    From Igor's blog post:
    Self-Contained Applications: Create Package without Java Runtime
    This may sound a bit puzzling at first glance. Package without embedded Java Runtime is not really self-contained and obviously will not help with:
    Deployment on fresh systems. JRE need to be installed separately (and this step will require admin permissions).
    Possible compatibility issues due to updates of system runtime.
    However, these packages are much much smaller in size. If download size matters and you are confident that user have recommended system JRE installed then this may be good option to consider if you want to improve user experience for install and launch.
    Technically, this is implemented as an extension of previous feature. Pass empty string as value for 'basedir' attribute and this will be treated as request to not bundle Java runtime, e.g.
    <fx:platform basedir=""/>
    https://blogs.oracle.com/talkingjavadeployment/entry/packaging_improvements_in_jdk_7#2

  • Create installer without labview

    Hi,
    Is it possible to create an installer without LabVIEW? I am supporting Windows 2000 through 7 and the versions of NI software varies with each OS, specifically when dealing with oscilloscopes running Windows due to VISA conflicts.
    The two main problems I have with creating installers with LabVIEW (Application Builder):
    1) Windows 2000 requires the Product Framework before 2.8.0. This makes it impossible for installers to run on Windows 2000 that require product installation newer than 2.8.0 which is basically every installation for Windows 7.
    2) As far as I am aware, the required software has to be installed on a local machine first before creating an installer. Then you navigate to the Additional Installers section when creating an installer to add to the installation. The location path will point to the orignal CD drive or location it was installed from on the local drive. I don't see why this required. Why can the installer be created directly from the extracted files without it being installed on machine?
    Thanks
    Solved!
    Go to Solution.

    Wow guys, thanks for two blatent insults. If you don't have anything nice to say don't say it at all.
    A little further explaination:
    Supporting and maintaining Windows 2000 in 2014, I agree, is cumbersome. However, you have to realize these oscilloscopes that run Windows 2000 in 2014 still cost upwards of $8,000 to replace and the operating system cannot be upgraded. Why do they still cost so much? Because they are very useful tools. And new ones cost $20,000 to $30,000. I don't think that this effort is "los[ing] [the company's] ability to make a profit".
    For those of you that are interested in the orignal question posted here is my solution.
    I used SFX Builder (http://sourceforge.net/projects/s-zipsfxbuilder/) to bundle NI's software into a single executeable file. Heres the steps:
    1) Download all necessary NI software
    2) Download SFX Builder
    3) Download 7-zip (http://www.7-zip.org/)
    1) Extract all NI software into a single folder and use 7-zip to compress into a .7z archive
    2) Open SFX Builder and add the .7z archive to the File tab
    3) You can easily set the path of extraction to anywhere on the computer, the temp (%temp%) is the most useful
    4) On the Tasks tab click the add/plus button and select Run Program, then enter the path where the extraction happened, here is an example
    5) Easy peasy!

  • Designing Java Apps for Users Without a JRE Installed Yet

    Hi, sorry if this post is in the wrong place, but here goes:
    I'm designing a Swing Java application for a client. My client intends to distribute/sell this application.
    I'm concerned because, chances are that at least one of the people he distributes this application to will not have the JRE installed and will thus be unable to run the application.
    Can anyone give me some suggestions on ways I can make my application more convenient for users without the JRE currently installed? Even some kind of error message that would direct the user to the JRE download site would be okay.
    kwikness
    Edited by: kwikness on Dec 2, 2009 5:56 PM

    Use NSIS and package your application with JRE.
    Add your jar files to lib/ext of the JRE package.
    NSIS can create a short cut (desktop/start menu) to launch java class/jar file
    I would not use webstart unless you are sure that clients will have access to the internet, the bandwidth is not an issue and installing the new JRE is allowed (permissions, SLA, etc.)
    Best regards.

  • I download Flash player, proceed through the steps, but it takes me to a page where Adobe wants me to buy photoshop and other products and no way to bypass this and just get on with the installation without buying anything.  Anyone out there know how to d

    I download Flash player, proceed through the steps, but it takes me to a page where Adobe wants me to buy photoshop and other products and no way to bypass this and just get on with the installation without buying anything.  Anyone out there know how to do it?

    Hi mansons67992701,
    No purchase is required to install Flash Player.  The offer you're seeing is optional.  There should be a yellow 'Install Now' button on the bottom right of the page. Is the button not displaying?  Please post a screenshot of the page (How to post a screenshot in the forum).
    Maria

  • How to uninstall java plugin without removing JRE completely

    how to uninstall java plugin without removing JRE completely.
    Hope someonce can help, all the documentation ive seen till now shows how to uninstall the Java plugin by completely removing the JRE.
    Also if you install JRE 1.4.1_01 and do not choose to install the browser plugin on the browers prompted ... does it not install the plugin?

    In IE
    Tools -> Internet Options -> Settings -> View Objects
    Delete the ActiveX control for the Java Plugin
    This removes the ActiveX control (plug-in) from the browser but doesn't delete the JRE.

  • Is it possible to convert Java to EXE and run this EXE file without any JRE

    hello friends
    I have GCC/GCJ for windows but dont know how to work with it... it creates file with .o extension but i m not able to create .exe from that... i installed mingw for that also .. unsuccessful ...
    tell me the solution for it... i want to generate machine dependent exe from java file...on the web i ve seen that GCC/GCJ is used on linux platform..not cleared properly..
    Again i m writing my question
    Is it possible to convert Java to EXE and run this EXE file without any JRE if yes then how... tell me the procedure to do that...

    Vipul wrote:
    Its software now hardware .... some times u need these things ...anyway do u ve solution for my questionSo what? By creating a native executable you are restricting the program to the OS for which that native executable was made, just like removing the engine from a car restricts driving to downhill only. So like the I said, the principle remains the same, "Why would you want to?"
    I am asking you, truthfully, why do you feel the need to negate the largest advantage of using Java by creating a native executable from it?
    What is your rationale?
    I can pretty much guarantee there is a much better way of achieving your wish without "removing the engine".

  • Mavericks installer without using the App store

    Where can I download a Mavericks installer without using the App store? My company has not sanctioned use the app store. I have admin rights and am allowed to upgrade myself if I am able to download a standalone version from the website. Which is what I usually do.

    Of course. I should have been more specific. I meant from the Apple website. Typically, I have always downloaded standalone installers from http://support.apple.com/downloads/. However, the 10.9.1 updates you will find here require 10.9. That's my probem. I can't find a 10.9 standalone as I have been able to in the past.

  • JRE installation without JDK

    Hi,
    I am using 9i AS on Solaris 8 as application server for J2EE application development. In production server, is it possible to install JRE alone so that I can run the deployment files without JDK.
    Thanks in advance,
    Karan.

    Hi,
    I don't know about that application server, but many application servers need a JDK in order to run. The JDK is used to compile jsp-pages etc.
    /Kaj

  • JDK installed in WindowsXP but without public jre. Problems!!

    Hello everyone. I have a few questions regarding a jdk installation. I never install a public copy of the jre mainly because I think it's a waste of space. But here are the down sides. I haven't been able to use the java plugin with Firefox, even though I have tried copying all related dll files into firefox's plugin folder. If I check "about:plugins" I see all the java plugins, but I can't see the applets (Firefox doesn't even tell me that the plugin is missing, the applet just doesn't show). The other thing is that I canno't double click an executable jar file to start an app, I have to open a console and run it myself.
    I refuse to believe that this can't be done without the public jre. Is there any way?
    Thanx for all your help

    You have to compare the space this uses with the time it takes.
    If you compress the folder it takes up 42 MB which costs about 2 pence or 4 cents.
    How much is your time worth?

  • If I download Mountain Lion on my MBP , can I use the same installer file on a different computer and continue the installation without Internet connectivity?

    Hi Folks,
    I have just downloaded Mountain lion on my  Macbook Pro(haven't installed it yet) . My question is, can I copy the same downloaded Mountain Lion from the Applications on to an external hard drive and use the same on a different computer? I am having problems with internet connectivity right now, it would be amazing if it can be installed on the iMac without internet connection.
    So is that doable?
    Thanks in advance

    And the 2nd installation would not require internet connectivity? Except , of course during the set up and the configuration of iCloud and location based services, which I can skip at the time

  • Running a labview installer without installing drivers

    Ouch. I have to install multiple LabView programs onto the same machine and they were all compiled with different versions. I don't have the luxury of rebuilding them. When I try installing some of them, the program won't let me install because newer drivers are already installed on the machine. Is there a way of running an installer to install the program without installing the drivers?
    Solved!
    Go to Solution.

    The folder where the installer was placed into should have a bunch of folder in the "bin" folder all starting with "p". These contain the various installers that are run. The actual installer for your executable should be in there somewhere, so you could try running it directly.

  • Creating addon installer without BIDE

    Hi all
    i would like to know how can an installer project can be created for an addon without the use of the BIDE tools
    appreciate the help
    Yoav

    Yoav,
    The SAP Business One SDK Help Center Documentation covers "packaging" your solution in very good detail.  You should review this.  In the SDK Help Center documentation, look under "Package and Deployment".  You can also search this forum and there are many posts on this subject.
    Eddy

Maybe you are looking for