IOS 7 update taking too long

I finally got my iphone to start the update, but the estimated time remaining was 41 hours. should I keep going on the update or should I stop? I don't want to see an error after waiting for two days.

were you finally able to get the update?
It just doesn't happen on my phone.
It is stuck on Preparing to update for over an hour now

Similar Messages

  • Ios 7 taking too long to download from iTunes

    Iam an iPad mini user.i am trying to download and update to ios7 software.but is taking too long(10 hours) and shows no sign of decrease.so what is the solution to this?

    It should not take so long.
    Try reset iPad and work from there.
    Hold down the Sleep/Wake button and the Home button at the same time for at least ten seconds, until the Apple logo appears
    Note: Data will not be affected.

  • After iOS update, screen too long??

    Not sure the best way to word this, but it's been only today that this has been happening. The bottom and edges of my screen are cut off, and it's only been since this latest iOS update. It's like they're expecting my screen to be longer? Sometimes it autocorrects it and bounces back but it's messing with my typing and everything, posting double letters and not letting me edit pictures. What is going on???

    Try:
    - Reset the iPod. Nothing will be lost
    Reset iPod touch: Hold down the On/Off button and the Home button at the same time for at
    least ten seconds, until the Apple logo appears.
    - Reset all settings
    Go to Settings > General > Reset and tap Reset All Settings.
    All your preferences and settings are reset. Information (such as contacts and calendars) and media (such as songs and videos) aren’t affected.
    - Restore from backup
    - Restore to factory settings/new iPod.
    - Make an appointment at the Genius Bar of an Apple store.
    Apple Retail Store - Genius Bar

  • UPDATE taking too long

    Hi everyone,
    I have a small problem with a simple update statement that takes more than 15 minutes to execute. I really don't understand why it's taking that much. I'm using Oracle 10g (release 5).
    Here is the statement:
    EXPLAIN PLAN FOR
         UPDATE local_persons a
            SET a.is_deleted = '1'
          WHERE NOT EXISTS (SELECT 1
                              FROM remote_persons_mv z
                             WHERE a.person_id = z.person_id
                               AND a.institution_code = z.institution_code
                             UNION ALL
                            SELECT 1
                              FROM cf_additional_persons z  
                             WHERE a.person_id = z.person_id
                               AND z.transform_type = 'CREATE');If you want to know how much records by table (remote_persons_mv is a materialized view).
    - local_persons : 48770 records
    - cf_additional_person: 4 records
    - remote_persons_mv: 48766 records
    Here is the execution plan I get.
    Plan hash value: 3382227091
    | Id  | Operation               | Name                      | Rows  | Bytes | Cost (%CPU)| Time     |
    |   0 | UPDATE STATEMENT        |                           |  2285 | 52555 |  7602K  (1)| 25:20:27 |
    |   1 |  UPDATE                 | LOCAL_PERSONS             |       |       |            |          |
    |*  2 |   FILTER                |                           |       |       |            |          |
    |   3 |    TABLE ACCESS FULL    | LOCAL_PERSONS             | 45702 |  1026K|   125   (3)| 00:00:02 |
    |   4 |    UNION-ALL            |                           |       |       |            |          |
    |*  5 |     MAT_VIEW ACCESS FULL| REMOTE_PERSONS_MV         |     5 |   175 |   176   (2)| 00:00:03 |
    |*  6 |     TABLE ACCESS FULL   | CF_ADDITIONAL_PERSONS     |     1 |    20 |     3   (0)| 00:00:01 |
    Predicate Information (identified by operation id):
       2 - filter( NOT EXISTS ( (SELECT 1 FROM "REMOTE_PERSONS_MV" "Z" WHERE "Z"."PERSON_ID"=:B1
                  AND "Z"."INSTITUTION_CODE"=:B2) UNION ALL  (SELECT 1 FROM "CF_ADDITIONAL_PERSONS" "Z"
                  WHERE "Z"."PERSON_ID"=:B3 AND "Z"."TRANSFORM_TYPE"='CREATE')))
       5 - filter("Z"."PERSON_ID"=:B1 AND "Z"."INSTITUTION_CODE"=:B2)
       6 - filter("Z"."PERSON_ID"=:B1 AND "Z"."TRANSFORM_TYPE"='CREATE')
    Note
       - dynamic sampling used for this statementI also checked if my statistics are correctly gathered and it seems so:
    SELECT table_name, pct_free, num_rows, blocks, avg_row_len, last_analyzed
      FROM all_tables
    WHERE table_name = 'LOCAL_PERSONS';
    LOCAL_PERSONS     10     48770     622     74     09/11/11
    SELECT table_name, pct_free, num_rows, blocks, avg_row_len, last_analyzed
      FROM all_tables
    WHERE table_name = 'REMOTE_PERSONS_MV';
    REMOTE_PERSONS_MV     10     48766     896     114     09/11/11I know that pct_free is not computed in statistics.
    Does anyone have any idea about why is it taking soooo long??
    Thanks,

    You could also try to change the query so that instead of a NOT exists you do an IN + left join.
    Looking at the execution plan the optimizer already seem to be doing this, but I might be mistaken. I just wonder where the second table access to local_persons is coming from.
    Also important might be how many rows are already marked as deleted. Your select each time reconsiders those rows, without any need to do so. This might take much time. I added "a.is_deleted = '0' " in the next example.
    untested
    UPDATE local_persons a
    SET a.is_deleted = '1'
    WHERE a.is_deleted = '0' /* might be IS NOT NULL expression, depending how your column is filled */
    AND a.id in ( /* here we build a list of IDs to be deleted */
      select p2.id
      from local_persons p2
      left join remote_persons_mv z on p2.person_id = z.person_id and p2.institution_code = z.institution_code
      left join cf_additional_persons ap on ap.person_id = p2.person_id and ap.transform_type = 'CREATE'
      where z.person_id is null
      and ap.person_id is null
      )Edited by: Sven W. on Nov 9, 2011 4:03 PM

  • Macbook air updates taking too long

    I just bought my macbook air.  It needs 13 program updates.  I started to do them all at once, and it was estimated to take over 900 hours.  I stopped it and started to do them one at a time.  Doing that, I was able to update 6 of them.  One of them is 66KB and is estimated to take 10 hours.  Seems pretty crazy.  Is this normal? 

    Don't get too anxious about estimated times. The estimator constantly updates as the download progresses. It observes how much data needs to be downloaded, how long it took for the portion already downloaded, and extrapolates from that. It gets more accurate as it goes. The numbers can be pretty wild at first. It's like trying to estimate your MPG after driving 2 blocks.

  • Software update taking too long!

    Hi,
    I recently got myself a Macbook Pro 13" newer version (late 2011 model) running Mac OS X Lion.
    Today I got a system update notification for safari, and it asked me to restart the Macbook for system update.
    Its been 15 minutes since that update is installing, and after reboot the Macbook is just stuck on "installing 1 item - Running package scripts" in Software Update window.
    Mouse is working fine though. Nothing seems frozen - even the progress bar is showing some animation, but it just isnt going ahead!
    Any ideas for a Mac noobie?
    Much Thanks!

    Those CD's that come with the BT HomeHub are a waste of time, they are full of rubbish that you dont need and waste space on the pc. My Hub has been running happily since day one without the software- the settings are changed here http://bthomehub.home the passwords etc are on the back of the Hub and wireless settings card.
    If you have Option 2 or 3 Broadband then BT Net Protect is not on the CD, but here:- https://www.securedownload.bt.com/BTGuard/Guard?beanName=OnlineCustomer&block=online&authenticationR...
    To get the hub going then you need a pin, push the reset to defaults on the side for about 10 seconds and release, wait for the Hub to boot then it will work as normal.
    If your connecting wirelessly then you need the wireless settings card this will tell you what your SSID name is and your passcode- open the wireless networks on your laptop and select device enter passcode- Done!
    Hope this helps!

  • BIOS Update taking too long

    I come across that the tablet/pc needes a BIOS Update which automatically began. But that was at 6pm(Puerto Rico Time) and its 10:43pm and its still going. I can not do anything else on the tablet/pc. I bought the tablet/pc online. I got it at the begining of the year. What can I do ?

    May I know the model name and number of your device? Also if you can remember the SP number of the BIOS update you used.

  • My iPod was updating to iOS 6 and i shut it off during the update because it was taking too long and now my screen in baby blue i've tried to drain the battery but when i plugged it in to charge the blue screen came back on.I dont know what to do

    My iPod was updating to iOS 6 and i shut it off during the update because it was taking too long and now my screen in baby blue i've tried to drain the battery but when i plugged it in to charge the blue screen came back on.I dont know what to do

    Try:
    - iOS: Not responding or does not turn on
    - If not successful and you can't fully turn the iPod fully off, let the battery fully drain. After charging for an least an hour try the above again.
    - If still not successful that indicates a hardware problem and an appointment at the Genius Bar of an Apple store is in order.

  • HT4623 Updating to iOS 7 is taking too long can I cancel?

    I want to abort. Upgrading to iOS 7 as it is taking too long,   I want to try later, can I?

    as long as you do not have a progress bar on the screen of the iphone you should be able to cancel
    Dante

  • Why iPad2 is taking too long time for a software update?

    Hi, i have iPad2 with iOS 4.3, now I'd like to update to iOS 6.1.2, but it is taking too long time to update when i connect to iYunes.My internet speed is 15mbps.I am unable to understand the problem.Please help me

    Hi, i have iPad2 with iOS 4.3, now I'd like to update to iOS 6.1.2, but it is taking too long time to update when i connect to iYunes.My internet speed is 15mbps.I am unable to understand the problem.Please help me

  • I am trying to update my ipad mini but taking too long time 5 hours

    i am trying to update my ipad mini to ios 7  but taking too long time 5 hours so what i have to do
    Message was edited by: GOPAL DHRUW

    You can try resetting your iPad by simultaneously pressing and holding the Home and Sleep/Wake buttons until you see the Apple Logo. This can take up to 15 seconds so be patient and don't release the buttons until the logo appears.
    Try again to see if the problem persists.

  • SQL Update statement taking too long..

    Hi All,
    I have a simple update statement that goes through a table of 95000 rows that is taking too long to update; here are the details:
    Oracle Version: 11.2.0.1 64bit
    OS: Windows 2008 64bit
    desc temp_person;
    Name                                                                                Null?    Type
    PERSON_ID                                                                           NOT NULL NUMBER(10)
    DISTRICT_ID                                                                     NOT NULL NUMBER(10)
    FIRST_NAME                                                                                   VARCHAR2(60)
    MIDDLE_NAME                                                                                  VARCHAR2(60)
    LAST_NAME                                                                                    VARCHAR2(60)
    BIRTH_DATE                                                                                   DATE
    SIN                                                                                          VARCHAR2(11)
    PARTY_ID                                                                                     NUMBER(10)
    ACTIVE_STATUS                                                                       NOT NULL VARCHAR2(1)
    TAXABLE_FLAG                                                                                 VARCHAR2(1)
    CPP_EXEMPT                                                                                   VARCHAR2(1)
    EVENT_ID                                                                            NOT NULL NUMBER(10)
    USER_INFO_ID                                                                                 NUMBER(10)
    TIMESTAMP                                                                           NOT NULL DATE
    CREATE INDEX tmp_rs_PERSON_ED ON temp_person (PERSON_ID,DISTRICT_ID) TABLESPACE D_INDEX;
    Index created.
    ANALYZE INDEX tmp_PERSON_ED COMPUTE STATISTICS;
    Index analyzed.
    explain plan for update temp_person
      2  set first_name = (select trim(f_name)
      3                    from ext_names_csv
      4                               where temp_person.PERSON_ID=ext_names_csv.p_id
      5                               and   temp_person.DISTRICT_ID=ext_names_csv.ed_id);
    Explained.
    @?/rdbms/admin/utlxpls.sql
    PLAN_TABLE_OUTPUT
    Plan hash value: 3786226716
    | Id  | Operation                   | Name           | Rows  | Bytes | Cost (%CPU)| Time     |
    |   0 | UPDATE STATEMENT            |                | 82095 |  4649K|  2052K  (4)| 06:50:31 |
    |   1 |  UPDATE                     | TEMP_PERSON    |       |       |            |          |
    |   2 |   TABLE ACCESS FULL         | TEMP_PERSON    | 82095 |  4649K|   191   (1)| 00:00:03 |
    |*  3 |   EXTERNAL TABLE ACCESS FULL| EXT_NAMES_CSV  |     1 |   178 |    24   (0)| 00:00:01 |
    Predicate Information (identified by operation id):
       3 - filter("EXT_NAMES_CSV"."P_ID"=:B1 AND "EXT_NAMES_CSV"."ED_ID"=:B2)
    Note
       - dynamic sampling used for this statement (level=2)
    19 rows selected.By the looks of it the update is going to take 6 hrs!!!
    ext_names_csv is an external table that have the same number of rows as the PERSON table.
    ROHO@rohof> desc ext_names_csv
    Name                                                                                Null?    Type
    P_ID                                                                                         NUMBER
    ED_ID                                                                                        NUMBER
    F_NAME                                                                                       VARCHAR2(300)
    L_NAME                                                                                       VARCHAR2(300)Anyone can help diagnose this please.
    Thanks
    Edited by: rsar001 on Feb 11, 2011 9:10 PM

    Thank you all for the great ideas, you have been extremely helpful. Here is what we did and were able to resolve the query.
    We started with Etbin's idea to create a table from the ext table so that we can index and reference easier than an external table, so we did the following:
    SQL> create table ext_person as select P_ID,ED_ID,trim(F_NAME) fst_name,trim(L_NAME) lst_name from EXT_NAMES_CSV;
    Table created.
    SQL> desc ext_person
    Name                                                                                Null?    Type
    P_ID                                                                                         NUMBER
    ED_ID                                                                                        NUMBER
    FST_NAME                                                                                     VARCHAR2(300)
    LST_NAME                                                                                     VARCHAR2(300)
    SQL> select count(*) from ext_person;
      COUNT(*)
         93383
    SQL> CREATE INDEX EXT_PERSON_ED ON ext_person (P_ID,ED_ID) TABLESPACE D_INDEX;
    Index created.
    SQL> exec dbms_stats.gather_index_stats(ownname=>'APPD', indname=>'EXT_PERSON_ED',partname=> NULL , estimate_percent=> 30 );
    PL/SQL procedure successfully completed.We had a look at the plan with the original SQL query that we had:
    SQL> explain plan for update temp_person
      2  set first_name = (select fst_name
      3                    from ext_person
      4                               where temp_person.PERSON_ID=ext_person.p_id
      5                               and   temp_person.DISTRICT_ID=ext_person.ed_id);
    Explained.
    SQL> @?/rdbms/admin/utlxpls.sql
    PLAN_TABLE_OUTPUT
    Plan hash value: 1236196514
    | Id  | Operation                    | Name           | Rows  | Bytes | Cost (%CPU)| Time     |
    |   0 | UPDATE STATEMENT             |                | 93383 |  1550K|   186K (50)| 00:37:24 |
    |   1 |  UPDATE                      | TEMP_PERSON    |       |       |            |          |
    |   2 |   TABLE ACCESS FULL          | TEMP_PERSON    | 93383 |  1550K|   191   (1)| 00:00:03 |
    |   3 |   TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID| EXTT_PERSON    |     9 |  1602 |     1   (0)| 00:00:01 |
    |*  4 |    INDEX RANGE SCAN          | EXT_PERSON_ED  |     1 |       |     1   (0)| 00:00:01 |
    Predicate Information (identified by operation id):
       4 - access("EXT_PERSON"."P_ID"=:B1 AND "RS_PERSON"."ED_ID"=:B2)
    Note
       - dynamic sampling used for this statement (level=2)
    20 rows selected.As you can see the time has dropped to 37min (from 6 hrs). Then we decided to change the SQL query and use donisback's suggestion (using MERGE); we explained the plan for teh new query and here is the results:
    SQL> explain plan for MERGE INTO temp_person t
      2  USING (SELECT fst_name ,p_id,ed_id
      3  FROM  ext_person) ext
      4  ON (ext.p_id=t.person_id AND ext.ed_id=t.district_id)
      5  WHEN MATCHED THEN
      6  UPDATE set t.first_name=ext.fst_name;
    Explained.
    SQL> @?/rdbms/admin/utlxpls.sql
    PLAN_TABLE_OUTPUT
    Plan hash value: 2192307910
    | Id  | Operation            | Name         | Rows  | Bytes |TempSpc| Cost (%CPU)| Time     |
    |   0 | MERGE STATEMENT      |              | 92307 |    14M|       |  1417   (1)| 00:00:17 |
    |   1 |  MERGE               | TEMP_PERSON  |       |       |       |            |          |
    |   2 |   VIEW               |              |       |       |       |            |          |
    |*  3 |    HASH JOIN         |              | 92307 |    20M|  6384K|  1417   (1)| 00:00:17 |
    |   4 |     TABLE ACCESS FULL| TEMP_PERSON  | 93383 |  5289K|       |   192   (2)| 00:00:03 |
    |   5 |     TABLE ACCESS FULL| EXT_PERSON   | 92307 |    15M|       |    85   (2)| 00:00:02 |
    Predicate Information (identified by operation id):
       3 - access("P_ID"="T"."PERSON_ID" AND "ED_ID"="T"."DISTRICT_ID")
    Note
       - dynamic sampling used for this statement (level=2)
    21 rows selected.As you can see, the update now takes 00:00:17 to run (need to say more?) :)
    Thank you all for your ideas that helped us get to the solution.
    Much appreciated.
    Thanks

  • Update statement taking too long to execute

    Hi All,
    I'm trying to run this update statement. But its taking too long to execute.
        UPDATE ops_forecast_extract b SET position_id = (SELECT a.row_id
            FROM s_postn a
            WHERE UPPER(a.desc_text) = UPPER(TRIM(B.POSITION_NAME)))
            WHERE position_level = 7
            AND b.am_id IS NULL;
            SELECT COUNT(*) FROM S_POSTN;
            214665
            SELECT COUNT(*) FROM ops_forecast_extract;
            49366
    SELECT count(*)
            FROM s_postn a, ops_forecast_extract b
            WHERE UPPER(a.desc_text) = UPPER(TRIM(B.POSITION_NAME));
    575What could be the reason for update statement to execute so long?
    Thanks

    polasa wrote:
    Hi All,
    I'm trying to run this update statement. But its taking too long to execute.
    What could be the reason for update statement to execute so long?You haven't said what "too long" means, but a simple reason could be that the scalar subquery on "s_postn" is using a full table scan for each execution. Potentially this subquery gets executed for each row of the "ops_forecast_extract" table that satisfies your filter predicates. "Potentially" because of the cunning "filter/subquery optimization" of the Oracle runtime engine that attempts to cache the results of already executed instances of the subquery. Since the in-memory hash table that holds these cached results is of limited size, the optimization algorithm depends on the sort order of the data and could suffer from hash collisions it's unpredictable how well this optimization works in your particular case.
    You might want to check the execution plan, it should tell you at least how Oracle is going to execute the scalar subquery (it doesn't tell you anything about this "filter/subquery optimization" feature).
    Generic instructions how to generate a useful explain plan output and how to post it here follow:
    Could you please post an properly formatted explain plan output using DBMS_XPLAN.DISPLAY including the "Predicate Information" section below the plan to provide more details regarding your statement. Please use the {noformat}[{noformat}code{noformat}]{noformat} tag before and {noformat}[{noformat}/code{noformat}]{noformat} tag after or the {noformat}{{noformat}code{noformat}}{noformat} tag before and after to enhance readability of the output provided:
    In SQL*Plus:
    SET LINESIZE 130
    EXPLAIN PLAN FOR <your statement>;
    SELECT * FROM TABLE(DBMS_XPLAN.DISPLAY);Note that the package DBMS_XPLAN.DISPLAY is only available from 9i on.
    In 9i and above, if the "Predicate Information" section is missing from the DBMS_XPLAN.DISPLAY output but you get instead the message "Plan table is old version" then you need to re-create your plan table using the server side script "$ORACLE_HOME/rdbms/admin/utlxplan.sql".
    In previous versions you could run the following in SQL*Plus (on the server) instead:
    @?/rdbms/admin/utlxplsA different approach in SQL*Plus:
    SET AUTOTRACE ON EXPLAIN
    <run your statement>;will also show the execution plan.
    In order to get a better understanding where your statement spends the time you might want to turn on SQL trace as described here:
    When your query takes too long ...
    and post the "tkprof" output here, too.
    Regards,
    Randolf
    Oracle related stuff blog:
    http://oracle-randolf.blogspot.com/
    SQLTools++ for Oracle (Open source Oracle GUI for Windows):
    http://www.sqltools-plusplus.org:7676/
    http://sourceforge.net/projects/sqlt-pp/

  • My iPad is taking too long to contact update software server during recovery.

    My iPad is taking too long to contact update software server during recovery. It can go on for 30 minutes and it would not load. What can I do?

    If the links are blocked by who-ever, you will keep getting those errors.
    About the only option would be to use a proxy.
    http://www.bing.com/search?q=proxy

  • Update is taking too long to install

    I'm in the process of installing an update to iTunes (11.0.4) and what I think is a security update on my MBP. However, the installation process is taking too long. First, it was stuck for about 2 hours on "registering updated components", and now (for the last hour) I'm seeing a blue screen with the spinning gear. Should I just keep waiting? Has anyone had a similar experience? 

    zornie,
    Try going to safari>preferences, general tab, and setting the "save downloaded files to your desktop (if desktop is not in the drop down menu, click other then select desktop from the left side bar). This will download the update to your dektop as a stand alone installer. Also if for some reason the download is interupted you can click the download icon on the desktop and it will resume where it left off. When the download is complete double click the icon/installer package and follow the prompts. Do them one at a time. (Thsi is not using software update, which can some times get corrupted during DL, especially if your are doing it wireless)
    Security update:
    http://support.apple.com/kb/DL1660
    iTunes:
    http://www.apple.com/itunes/download/
    Hope this helps

Maybe you are looking for

  • Problem with JFrame.setUndecorated(true)

    I am using a L&F that overrides the JFrame's default title bar, which requires that the following methods are called before showing my main gui. JFrame.setDefaultLookAndFeelDecorated(true); JDialog.setDefaultLookAndFeelDecorated(true);after gui is sh

  • How can i eject a bad cd from macbook air external drive?

    I have a Macbook Air and an external superdrive. On the mac keyboard doesn't have an eject button.. how to eject a bad cd? Thanks in advance!

  • Toggling between single and multiple selection in a table

    I am working on ADF faces. I need to switch between single and multiple selection in <af:table based on a button I select. I cannot use switcher or rendered property inside <af:table. Only the first one is rendering the second one is not rendering ba

  • Identify the size of unwrapped text in TextArea

    Here is the deal. I have a popup of fixed width where I dynamically add the textAreas. The PercentWidth of textArea is 100. Once the long url (as my custom text) is added into the definite textArea.htmlText, the text is wrapped. What I need is: I'd l

  • Most of my movie loads in frame 0

    Hello, I try to put a preloader on my movie but (according to "simulate preloading" most of the items loads on frame zero (yes 0) ... so the preloader appears only *after* most of it has been loaded. Is there a way to go around this. Explanation.: Th