Is index range scan the reason for query running long time

I would like to know whether index range scan is the reason for the query running long time. Below is the explain plan. If so, how to optimise it? Please help
Operation     Object     COST     CARDINALITY     BYTES
SELECT STATEMENT ()          413     1000     265000
COUNT (STOPKEY)                    
FILTER ()                    
TABLE ACCESS (BY INDEX ROWID)     ORDERS     413     58720     15560800
INDEX (RANGE SCAN)     IDX_SERV_PROV_ID     13     411709     
TABLE ACCESS (BY INDEX ROWID)     ADDRESSES     2     1     14
INDEX (UNIQUE SCAN)     SYS_C004605     1     1     
TABLE ACCESS (BY INDEX ROWID)     ADDRESSES     2     1     14
INDEX (UNIQUE SCAN)     SYS_C004605     1     1     
TABLE ACCESS (BY INDEX ROWID)     ADDRESSES     2     1     14
INDEX (UNIQUE SCAN)     SYS_C004605     1     1

The index range scan means that the optimiser has determined that it is better to read the index rather than perform a full table scan. So in answer to your question - quite possibly but the alternative might take even longer!
The best thing to do is to review your query and check that you need every table included in the query and that you are accessing the tables via the best route. For example if you can access a table via primary key index that would be better than using a non-unique index. But the best way of reducing the time the query takes to run is to give it less tables (and indexes) to read.
John Seaman
http://www.asktheoracle.net

Similar Messages

  • What is the reason for query take more time to execute

    Hi,
    What is the reason for the query take more time inside procedure.
    but if i execute that query alone then it excute within a minutes.
    query includes update and insert.

    I have a insert and update query when I execute
    without Procedure then that query execute faster but
    If I execute inside procedure then It takes 2 hours
    to execute.Put you watch 2 hours back and the problem will disappear.
    do you understand what I want to say?I understood what you wanted to say and I understood you didn't understood what I said.
    What does the procedure, what does the query, how can you say the query does the same as the procedure that takes longer. You didn't say anything useful to have an idea of what you're talking about.
    Everyone knows what means that something is slower than something else, but it means nothing if you don't say what you're talking about.
    To begin with something take a look at this
    When your query takes too long ...
    especially the part regarding the trace.
    Bye Alessandro

  • Select query running long time

    Hi,
    DB version : 10g
    platform : sunos
    My select sql query running long time (more than 20hrs) .Still running .
    Is there any way to find sql query completion time approximately. (Pending time)
    Also is there any possibilities to increase the speed of sql query (already running) like adding hints.
    Please help me on this .
    Thanks

    Hi Sathish thanks for your reply,
    I have already checked in V$SESSION_LONGOPS .But it's showing TIME_REMAINING -->0
    select TOTALWORK,SOFAR,START_TIME,TIME_REMAINING from V$SESSION_LONGOPS where SID='10'
    TOTALWORK      SOFAR START_TIME      TIME_REMAINING
         1099759    1099759 27-JAN-11                    0Any idea ?
    Thanks.

  • Query running long time

    hi
    I'm having a query running for long time, Im new to dba can any one suggest me methods to make it faster it's running now and i have to make it execute it faster
    parallel servers=4, and there are no inactive sessions.
    thanks in advance

    Make a habit of putting the database version in the post
    As i told u before i depends on lot of things not only merge(cartisian ) joins,
    1)It depends on the load the database is having,Was this query running fastly before?if it was running fastly then was the workload same as today?
    2)Any changes done to database recently or the server?
    3)only this query is slow all the queris are slow?
    4)When was database last restarted?
    5)Are u using bind variable in the query?
    6)Is you library cache properly sized?If the query is doing lots of sorts then is your PGA properly sized?
    7)Database buffer cache is properly sized?
    8)How much memory your database is having?
    9)Is your SGA properly fits in your memory or its getting swaped?
    Etc...Etc
    Check all these things
    Regards
    Kaunain

  • Query running longer time

    Hi All,
    when i run the query in Analyzer,it is taking longer time.the query is built on DSO.
    can anyone give me inputs why the query is taking much time
    Thanks in Advance
    Reddy

    Hi,
    Follow this thread to find out how to improve Query performance on ODS.
    ODS Query Performance  
    Achieving BI Query Performance Building Business Intelligence
    http://www.dmreview.com/issues/20051001/1038109-1.html
    Hope this helps.
    Thanks,
    JituK

  • Request for the reasons of Query taking much time

    Hi,
    I have one SQL query.When i execute that query from TOAD it is taking some 120 sec,but the same query when i execute from Forms(Front End) it is taking nearly 5 mints.I don't understand where the problem is.Can any one please help me on this with the resons & solutions(Steps to the overcome).
    Regards,
    Rao.

    Can you do an explain plan of the query in Toad?
    And a sql_trace of the form when it executes the query?
    If you have dba-rights you can enable sql-trace in the forms session by using:
    dbms_system.set_sql_trace_in_session(..sid.., ..serial#.., true);where sid and serial# are the values of the forms session (can be found in v$session).
    Toon

  • No data query runs longer time

    I have a table with 50 million records, partitioned based on date.
    if i do the query select * from test where trade_date = '01-mar-2010' brings
    the records in less than a second. works perfect
    but if there is no data for any given date in the table, the query takes more than 1 to 2 minute to completed.
    why the query takes that longer to comes back with NO DATA?
    comments are appreciated..
    note:
    i use 11g.
    statistics are collected.

    hello,
    the trade_date range partitioned..and every day the table will have data exception weekends and holidays..
    PARTITION BY RANGE (transaction_DT)
    PARTITION P001 VALUES LESS THAN (TO_DATE(' 2002-01-01 00:00:00', 'SYYYY-MM-DD HH24:MI:SS', 'NLS_CALENDAR=GREGORIAN')),
    PARTITION P002 VALUES LESS THAN (TO_DATE(' 2003-01-01 00:00:00', 'SYYYY-MM-DD HH24:MI:SS', 'NLS_CALENDAR=GREGORIAN')),
    PARTITION P003 VALUES LESS THAN (TO_DATE(' 2004-01-01 00:00:00', 'SYYYY-MM-DD HH24:MI:SS', 'NLS_CALENDAR=GREGORIAN')),
    PARTITION P004 VALUES LESS THAN (TO_DATE(' 2005-01-01 00:00:00', 'SYYYY-MM-DD HH24:MI:SS', 'NLS_CALENDAR=GREGORIAN')),
    PARTITION P005 VALUES LESS THAN (TO_DATE(' 2006-01-01 00:00:00', 'SYYYY-MM-DD HH24:MI:SS', 'NLS_CALENDAR=GREGORIAN')),
    PARTITION P006 VALUES LESS THAN (TO_DATE(' 2007-01-01 00:00:00', 'SYYYY-MM-DD HH24:MI:SS', 'NLS_CALENDAR=GREGORIAN')),
    PARTITION P007 VALUES LESS THAN (TO_DATE(' 2008-01-01 00:00:00', 'SYYYY-MM-DD HH24:MI:SS', 'NLS_CALENDAR=GREGORIAN')),
    PARTITION P008 VALUES LESS THAN (TO_DATE(' 2009-01-01 00:00:00', 'SYYYY-MM-DD HH24:MI:SS', 'NLS_CALENDAR=GREGORIAN')),
    PARTITION P009 VALUES LESS THAN (TO_DATE(' 2010-01-01 00:00:00', 'SYYYY-MM-DD HH24:MI:SS', 'NLS_CALENDAR=GREGORIAN')),
    PARTITION P010 VALUES LESS THAN (TO_DATE(' 2011-01-01 00:00:00', 'SYYYY-MM-DD HH24:MI:SS', 'NLS_CALENDAR=GREGORIAN')),
    PARTITION P011 VALUES LESS THAN (TO_DATE(' 2012-01-01 00:00:00', 'SYYYY-MM-DD HH24:MI:SS', 'NLS_CALENDAR=GREGORIAN')),
    PARTITION P012 VALUES LESS THAN (TO_DATE(' 2013-01-01 00:00:00', 'SYYYY-MM-DD HH24:MI:SS', 'NLS_CALENDAR=GREGORIAN')),
    PARTITION P013 VALUES LESS THAN (TO_DATE(' 2014-01-01 00:00:00', 'SYYYY-MM-DD HH24:MI:SS', 'NLS_CALENDAR=GREGORIAN')),
    PARTITION P014 VALUES LESS THAN (TO_DATE(' 2015-01-01 00:00:00', 'SYYYY-MM-DD HH24:MI:SS', 'NLS_CALENDAR=GREGORIAN')),
    PARTITION P015 VALUES LESS THAN (TO_DATE(' 2016-01-01 00:00:00', 'SYYYY-MM-DD HH24:MI:SS', 'NLS_CALENDAR=GREGORIAN')),
    PARTITION P016 VALUES LESS THAN (TO_DATE(' 2017-01-01 00:00:00', 'SYYYY-MM-DD HH24:MI:SS', 'NLS_CALENDAR=GREGORIAN')),
    PARTITION P017 VALUES LESS THAN (TO_DATE(' 2018-01-01 00:00:00', 'SYYYY-MM-DD HH24:MI:SS', 'NLS_CALENDAR=GREGORIAN')),
    PARTITION P018 VALUES LESS THAN (TO_DATE(' 2019-01-01 00:00:00', 'SYYYY-MM-DD HH24:MI:SS', 'NLS_CALENDAR=GREGORIAN')),
    PARTITION P019 VALUES LESS THAN (TO_DATE(' 2020-01-01 00:00:00', 'SYYYY-MM-DD HH24:MI:SS', 'NLS_CALENDAR=GREGORIAN')),
    PARTITION P020 VALUES LESS THAN (TO_DATE(' 2021-01-01 00:00:00', 'SYYYY-MM-DD HH24:MI:SS', 'NLS_CALENDAR=GREGORIAN')),
    PARTITION P021 VALUES LESS THAN (TO_DATE(' 2022-01-01 00:00:00', 'SYYYY-MM-DD HH24:MI:SS', 'NLS_CALENDAR=GREGORIAN')),
    PARTITION P022 VALUES LESS THAN (TO_DATE(' 2023-01-01 00:00:00', 'SYYYY-MM-DD HH24:MI:SS', 'NLS_CALENDAR=GREGORIAN')),
    PARTITION P023 VALUES LESS THAN (TO_DATE(' 2024-01-01 00:00:00', 'SYYYY-MM-DD HH24:MI:SS', 'NLS_CALENDAR=GREGORIAN')),
    PARTITION P024 VALUES LESS THAN (TO_DATE(' 2025-01-01 00:00:00', 'SYYYY-MM-DD HH24:MI:SS', 'NLS_CALENDAR=GREGORIAN')),
    PARTITION P025 VALUES LESS THAN (TO_DATE(' 9999-01-01 00:00:00', 'SYYYY-MM-DD HH24:MI:SS', 'NLS_CALENDAR=GREGORIAN'))
    Edited by: user520824 on Sep 1, 2010 12:12 PM

  • Direct Path Reads instead of Sequential Reads for index range scan

    Database is 11.2. I have two development schemas, with the same table loaded in each schema - a 5 million row table. The execution path for the sql statement is the same against both tables; it's doing an index range scan.
    But it would appear Oracle performs a direct path read against one schema, and performs sequential reads against the other schema. I don't understand why I'm seeing different behavior when the execution plan is the same. Any ideas? These are two different schemas in the same database.

    There is not enough information.So you even these tables located same database and you gathered statistics it is not mean both run time wait event statistics must be same.Really they are different tables.If both query use INDEX RANGE SCAN the it is not mean these plans are same.What about table and their index statistics? are they same? for example num_row or num_blocks of both tables are same? also about indexes.In additionally if you want to get exact reason you can enable sql trace(using dbms_monitor or setting sql_trace parameter to true according session) and need analyze result trace file using tkprof utility.In additionally in 11g here when query execution time oracle automatically choose direct read path(serial) based on size of tables and size of buffer cache(also here is available some hidden parameter to controlling this behavior).

  • SQL Query Executing longer time

    Hi , The below SQL query executing longer time . Please help to Improve the query performance. The query continuously running for more than 24 hours and failing with roolback segment error. Not getting the final output. Most of the tables are having milions of records.
    Select distinct
    IBS.ADSL_ACCESS_INFO,
    IBS.LIJ ,
    regexp_substr(OBVS.REFERENTIE_A,'[[:digit:]]+') as O_NUMBER,
    DBS.CKR_NUMMER_CONTRACTANT,
    DBS.DNUMBER
    FROM CD.IBS,
    CD.OIBL,
    CD.IH,
    CD.ODL,
    CD.OH,
    CD.DBS,
    CD.OBVS
    Where IBS.END_DT = To_Date('31129999', 'ddmmyyyy')
    AND OIBL.END_DT = to_date('31129999', 'ddmmyyyy')
    AND DBS.END_DT = to_date('31129999', 'ddmmyyyy')
    AND OBVS.END_DT = to_date('31129999', 'ddmmyyyy')
    AND OBVS.REFERENTIE_A LIKE 'OFM%'
    AND OIBL.INFRA_KEY = IH.INFRA_KEY
    AND OIBL.ORDERS_KEY = OH.ORDERS_KEY
    AND IBS.INFH_ID = IH.INFH_ID
    AND ODL.ORDH_ID = OH.ORDH_ID
    AND DBS.DEBH_ID = ODL.DEBH_ID
    AND OBVS.ORDH_ID = ODL.ORDH_ID
    Order By IBS.LIJ
    All the columns which are present in the where condition are having either Index/key (Primary/unique) except END_DT column.
    Please Advise

    Predicate pushing can help when it greatlly restricts the number of rows - you must experiment - might not work with all predicates pushed (as shown here)
    select distinct
           ibs.adsl_access_info,
           ibs.lij,
           obvs.o_number,
           dbs.ckr_nummer_contractant,
           dbs.dnumber
      from (select infh_id,adsl_access_info,lij
              from cd.ibs
             where end_dt = to_date('31129999','ddmmyyyy')
           ) ibs,
           (select infra_key,orders_key
              from cd.oibl
             where end_dt = to_date('31129999','ddmmyyyy')
           ) oibl,
           (select ordh_id,regexp_substr(obvs.referentie_a,'[[:digit:]]+') as o_number
              from cd.obvs
             where end_dt = to_date('31129999','ddmmyyyy')
               and referentie_a like 'OFM%'
           ) obvs,
           (select debh_id,ckr_nummer_contractant,dnumber
              from cd.dbs
             where end_dt = to_date('31129999','ddmmyyyy')
           ) dbs,
           cd.ih,
           cd.odl,
           cd.oh
    where oibl.infra_key = ih.infra_key
       and oibl.orders_key = oh.orders_key
       and ibs.infh_id = ih.infh_id
       and odl.ordh_id = oh.ordh_id
       and dbs.debh_id = odl.debh_id
       and obvs.ordh_id = odl.ordh_id
    order by ibs.lijRegards
    Etbin

  • OS 10.3 - Hub shows huge "message deleted" sign for a very long time

    I genereally really like the 10.3 OS update, but there has been a change to the hub which is puzzling me:
    When, for example, I open my email account in the hub, I get the option to show trash bins next to all messages so I can delete them more easily. Great!
    If I do that, however, I get a huge sign "message deleted / retrieve message" (or something similar, my OS is in German) - and it covers one third of the display for a very long time (four seconds or so), making the feature super slow instead of fast. Because, if I want to delete the next message, I will have to wait for it to disappear. Otherwise I might retreive the deleted message and start from zero again. Most of the time I cannot even see the next message which I would like to delete as the pop up is covering two to three messages entirely.
    The problem would be solved if a) the pop up sign were significantly smaller or b) it would not show up for such a long time. 
    Is there any fix to this issue?

    Hi,
    I know what you mean but I think for the moment it can ot be changed. JSanders has opened a feature request post.
    http://supportforums.blackberry.com/t5/BlackBerry-​10-OS-Device-Software/Feature-Requests-beyond-Blac​...
    I recommend you put this item there. Hopefully someone from BB reads it and changes it for the future.
    Alex
    Please feel free to hit "Like" if my post was helpful :-) Thank You!

  • Taking more time in INDEX RANGE SCAN compare to the full table scan

    Hi all ,
    Below are the version og my database.
    SQL> select * from v$version;
    BANNER
    Oracle Database 10g Enterprise Edition Release 10.2.0.4.0 - 64bi
    PL/SQL Release 10.2.0.4.0 - Production
    CORE 10.2.0.4.0 Production
    TNS for HPUX: Version 10.2.0.4.0 - Production
    NLSRTL Version 10.2.0.4.0 - Production
    I have gather the table statistics and plan change for sql statment.
    SELECT P1.COMPANY, P1.PAYGROUP, P1.PAY_END_DT, P1.PAYCHECK_OPTION,
    P1.OFF_CYCLE, P1.PAGE_NUM, P1.LINE_NUM, P1.SEPCHK  FROM  PS_PAY_CHECK P1
    WHERE P1.FORM_ID = :1 AND P1.PAYCHECK_NBR = :2 AND
    P1.CHECK_DT = :3 AND P1.PAYCHECK_OPTION <> 'R'
    Plan before the gather stats.
    Plan hash value: 3872726522
    | Id  | Operation         | Name         | Rows  | Bytes | Cost (%CPU)| Time     |
    |   0 | SELECT STATEMENT  |              |       |       | *14306* (100)|          |
    |   1 |  *TABLE ACCESS FULL| PS_PAY_CHECK* |     1 |    51 | 14306   (4)| 00:02:52 |
    Plan after the gather stats:
    Operation     Object Name     Rows     Bytes     Cost
    SELECT STATEMENT Optimizer Mode=CHOOSE
              1           4
      *TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID     SYSADM.PS_PAY_CHECK*     1     51     *4*
        *INDEX RANGE SCAN     SYSADM.PS0PAY_CHECK*     1           3After gather stats paln look good . but when i am exeuting the query it take 5 hours. before the gather stats it finishing the within 2 hours. i do not want to restore my old statistics. below are the data for the tables.and when i am obserrving it lot of db files scatter rea
    NAME                                 TYPE        VALUE
    _optimizer_cost_based_transformation string      OFF
    filesystemio_options                 string      asynch
    object_cache_optimal_size            integer     102400
    optimizer_dynamic_sampling           integer     2
    optimizer_features_enable            string      10.2.0.4
    optimizer_index_caching              integer     0
    optimizer_index_cost_adj             integer     100
    optimizer_mode                       string      choose
    optimizer_secure_view_merging        boolean     TRUE
    plsql_optimize_level                 integer     2
    SQL> select count(*) from sysadm.ps_pay_check;
    select num_rows,blocks from dba_tables where table_name ='PS_PAY_CHECK';
      COUNT(*)
       1270052
    SQL> SQL> SQL>
      NUM_ROWS     BLOCKS
       1270047      63166
    Event                                 Waits    Time (s)   (ms)   Time Wait Class
    db file sequential read           1,584,677       6,375      4   36.6   User I/O
    db file scattered read            2,366,398       5,689      2   32.7   User I/Oplease let me know why it taking more time in INDEX RANGE SCAN compare to the full table scan?

    suresh.ratnaji wrote:
    NAME                                 TYPE        VALUE
    _optimizer_cost_based_transformation string      OFF
    filesystemio_options                 string      asynch
    object_cache_optimal_size            integer     102400
    optimizer_dynamic_sampling           integer     2
    optimizer_features_enable            string      10.2.0.4
    optimizer_index_caching              integer     0
    optimizer_index_cost_adj             integer     100
    optimizer_mode                       string      choose
    optimizer_secure_view_merging        boolean     TRUE
    plsql_optimize_level                 integer     2
    please let me know why it taking more time in INDEX RANGE SCAN compare to the full table scan?Suresh,
    Any particular reason why you have a non-default value for a hidden parameter, optimizercost_based_transformation ?
    On my 10.2.0.1 database, its default value is "linear". What happens when you reset the value of the hidden parameter to default?

  • I am passing range table from the method of ODATA Service to FM but In FM range table is becoming initial.What would be the reason for the same?

    I am passing range table from the method of ODATA Service to FM but In FM range table is becoming initial.What would be the reason for the same?

    Vinod, Can you share detail on how are you sending and how are you reading.

  • What is mean by index range scan and fast full scan

    What is mean by the following execution plans
    1)Table access by index rowid
    2) Index range scan
    3) Index fast full scan
    4) global index by rowid
    ..etc
    where i can get this information.In what situation CBO take these paths.Can you pls give me a link where i can find all these.I read these long time ago but not able to recollect
    Thanks
    Anand

    Oracle® Database Performance Tuning Guide
    10g Release 2 (10.2)
    Part Number B14211-01
    13.5 Understanding Access Paths for the Query Optimizer
    http://download-east.oracle.com/docs/cd/B19306_01/server.102/b14211/optimops.htm#sthref1281

  • Dblink + local function: INDEX RANGE SCAN not used

    Hi All,
    I have an sql query to remote database:
    SELECT N FROM [email protected] WHERE cd_n = 60
    It works with INDEX RANGE SCAN for "N" field of table "tab", it's ok.
    Now I'm replacing the constant value with the local database function:
    SELECT N FROM [email protected] WHERE cd_n = dannis.foo()
    Then 'INDEX RANGE SCAN' is removed out from query execution plan :-(
    I've tried some tricks as
    /*+ rule index(user.tab TAB$PK) */,
    driving_site(tab),
    to_number(dannis.foo()),
    (select dannis.foo from [email protected])
    and so on...
    but INDEX RANGE SCAN wasn't appear while using the local function.
    Is it true when dblink is used in combination with local function then INDEX RANGE SCAN will never used?
    /Oracle 9.0.1.2/
    Thanx,
    dannis.

    See Optimizer not taking the hint

  • Index Range Scan / Deleted Leaf Blocks

    Hello guys,
    i have such a scenario on a big index / table which i can not reproduce on my test database, so i need to know how oracle handles the index range scan.
    For example:
    TABLE TAB with the following columns NR (number), I_DATE (date), TEXT (VARCHAR2(50))
    INDEX I_TAB on the column I_DATE.
    Now the index has blevel 2 and many leaf blocks. And now my question.
    Query: SQL> SELECT * from TAB WHERE I_DATE < 10.10.2004
    The index had stored some values which are a less than 2003 but these ones are already deleted (so the leaf blocks are gone to the freelist), but it was not reorganized.
    The execution plan is a INDEX RANGE SCAN on the INDEX I_TAB. Does the branch block still have pointers to the deleted leaf blocks which contained only 2003 values before (and so the INDEX RANGE SCAN scans all these blocks too) or are the pointers to these leaf blocks deleted in the branch block?
    Thanks and Regards
    Stefan

    You can verify it by yourself. See following:
    SELECT count(*) FROM index_test;
    ==> 1569408
    SELECT count(*) FROM index_test WHERE id <= 2;
    ==> 12
    -- Delete all except first 12 rows
    DELETE FROM index_test WHERE id > 2;
    -- Query and SQL Trace
    BEGIN
    FOR C IN (SELECT /*+index(index_test index_test_idx) deleted */ * FROM INDEX_TEST WHERE ID < 1000000) LOOP
    NULL;
    END LOOP;
    END;
    SELECT /*+index(index_test index_test_idx) deleted */ *
    FROM
    INDEX_TEST WHERE ID < 1000000
    call count cpu elapsed disk query current rows
    Parse 1 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 0
    Execute 1 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 0
    Fetch 1 0.00 0.00 0 3490 0 12
    total 3 0.00 0.01 0 3490 0 12
    ==> 3490 logical reads only for 12 rows and range scan??
    -- Index tree dump
    ALTER SESSION SET EVENTS 'IMMEDIATE TRACE NAME TREEDUMP LEVEL 67513'
    ----- begin tree dump
    branch: 0x1000124 16777508 (0: nrow: 6, level: 2)
    branch: 0x100b1ca 16822730 (-1: nrow: 557, level: 1)
    leaf: 0x1000125 16777509 (-1: nrow: 512 rrow: 12)
    leaf: 0x1000126 16777510 (0: nrow: 484 rrow: 0)
    leaf: 0x1000127 16777511 (1: nrow: 479 rrow: 0)
    leaf: 0x1000128 16777512 (2: nrow: 479 rrow: 0)
    leaf: 0x1000139 16777529 (3: nrow: 479 rrow: 0)
    leaf: 0x100013a 16777530 (4: nrow: 478 rrow: 0)
    branch: 0x100b401 16823297 (0: nrow: 558, level: 1)
    leaf: 0x100b1c9 16822729 (-1: nrow: 449 rrow: 0)
    leaf: 0x100b1cb 16822731 (0: nrow: 449 rrow: 0)
    leaf: 0x100b1cc 16822732 (1: nrow: 449 rrow: 0)
    ==> leaf:3488, branch: 7
    This means that almost all the branch and leaf nodes are read only for 12 keys.
    You can cross check this with the result of "10200" event which traces cr reads. You would find out that the blocks that are read by the query are exactly same as all the index blocks.
    This is what you mean? that the deleted leaf blocks(which contain no actual data) are read by range scan? Through the simple test, the anwer is "yes".

Maybe you are looking for