Is number of users affect the performance?

Hi,
Is number of user affect the performance?
Is there any limit to number of user that java can handle at a time.

PrasadW_Java_forum wrote:
Is number of user affect the performance?Not directly. It just eats memory, network traffic and CPU power. If one or more of them runs out, then it will affect performance. Bad code design will speed up this effect.
Is there any limit to number of user that java can handle at a time.I am not sure, but it shouldn't surprise me if there is some technical limitation with the same value as Integer.MAX_VALUE. Though, you still need a lot of memory/storage to achieve this :)

Similar Messages

Make the relationship in between multiple table storage's tables will affect the performance

Hi,
i'm going to develop business application,the product ID needs to be generic one and it should automatically generate the unique id(like identity in sql ) but,it has to be generate in formatted way
for example the ID would be "cityCode+areaCode+uniqueNumber" . here, cityCode and areaCode are going to maintain in separate table. while generate the product id, going to find the cityCode table and AreaCode table the generate unique
number by merge all the respective information.
1) while doing all this will affect the performance Azure table storage performance and web application ?
2) making multiple relationship among multi-Table Storage will decrease the performance ?.

Hello,
When you say tables, are referring to Azure Storage Tables or Relational Databases?
Please note Windows Azure tables do not function in the same manner as tables in a relational database since they do not make use of relationships or have schemas.
And if you are referring to relational databases, the latency in performance would depend on the logic used to generate the unique ID.
You should be able to use the logic in an On-Prem SQL database and check for the latency.
Regards,
Malar.

Do the enhancements affect the performance even if they are blank?

I means that SAP has preserved so many user exit for developer to do enhancement, is it has effect to system performance even though we didn't implement them? because the system must always check if there is implemented enhancements.
Moderator Message: Moved from ABAP General as the Performance Experts are here.
Edited by: kishan P on Aug 31, 2010 12:18 PM

No, enhancements doesn't affect the performance at all.
It's true that there are a huge amount of enhancements, but to check every one for your current process doesn't affect. You don't do a lot of access to database in order to check every enhancement.

Will my graphics card affect the performance of Flash Professional on my computer?

Hello everyone,
I want to know if the graphics card in a computer affects the performance of Flash Professional. Or if I am going to experience any issues with computer such as lag or errors. I want to use a computer that has an hd 4600 graphics card with and i5 dual core processor. Will this be more than enough or should I opt for a i5 quadcore with an intel iris?

Hi LaangDao,
These are the system requirements for Flash Professional
System requirements | Flash Professional
Thanks,
Preran

For adding about 70 shift registers to my VI , will it affect the performance of the project or it depends on my PC ??

I have 70 shift registers to accumulate date from 70 channels to plot it every channel individually , will these shift registers affect the performance of the project or it depends on my PC ??

Osama90 wrote:
I have 70 shift registers to accumulate date from 70 channels to plot it every channel individually , will these shift registers affect the performance of the project or it depends on my PC ??
It will certainly affect your performance and ability to handle/change your code. Change it to an array of plots, either as a 2D array (if using the same sampling rate), or an array of clusters with the channels (1D array?) as data. From a machine perspective 70 SRs should work, but not from a person perspective.
/Y
LabVIEW 8.2 - 2014
"Only dead fish swim downstream" - "My life for Kudos!" - "Dumb people repeat old mistakes - smart ones create new ones."
G# - Free award winning reference based OOP for LV

How autoextend affects the performance of a big data load

I'm doing a bit of reorganization on a datawarehouse, and I need to move almost 5 TB worth of tables, and rebuild their indexes. I'm creating a tablespace por each month, using BIGFILE tablespaces, and assigning to them 600GB, that is the approximate of size of the tables for each month. The process of just assigning the space takes a lot of time, and I decided to try a different approach and change the datafile to AUTOEXTEND ON NEXT 512M, and then run the ALTER TABLE MOVE command to move the tables. The database is Oracle 11g Release 2, and it uses ASM. I was wondering what would be the best approach between these two:
1. Create the tablespace, with AUTOEXTEND OFF, and assign 600GB to it, and then run the ALTER TABLE MOVE command. The space would be enough for all the tables.
2. Create the tablespace, with AUTOEXTEND ON, and without assigning more than 1GB, run the ALTER TABLE MOVE command. The diskgroup has enough space for the expected size of the tablespace.
With the first approach my database is taking 10 minutes approx moving each partition (there's one for each day of the month). Would this number be impacted in a big way if the database has to do an AUTOEXTEND each 512 MB?

If you measure the performance as the time required to allocate the initial 600 GB data file plus the time to do the load and compare that to allocating a small file and doing the load, letting the data file autoextend, it's unlikely that you'll see a noticable difference. You'll get far more variation just in moving 600 GB around than you'll lose waiting on the data file to extend. If there is a difference, allocating the entire file up front will be slightly more efficient.
More likely, however, is that you wouldn't count the time required to allocate the initial 600 GB data file since that is something that can be done far in advance. If you don't count that time, then allocating the entire file up front will be much more efficient.
If you may need less than 600 GB, on the other hand, allocating the entire file at once may waste some space. If that is a concern, it may make sense to compromise and allocate a 500 GB file initially (assuming that is a reasonable lower bound on the size you'll actually need) and let the file extend in 1 GB chunks. That won't be the most efficient approach and you may waste up to a GB of space but that may be a reasonable compromise.
Justin

Number of elements in the FP affecting the performance of my application ?

I developed a simple application which consists of aquiring a signal through a channel of a PXI 5102 module and commanding some relays of a SCXI 1161 module.
This application has the following features :
-The user can, at any time, change the configuration of the PXI 5102 module.
-The signal acquired can be saved to a file whenever the user wants.
-Instead of showing the signal acquired through the PXI 5102 channel, the user can load a given file which contains a saved signal.
-The user can increase or decrease the pressure on a line through a VI that commands SCXI 1161 relays.
As you can see, it is a fairly simple application but the problem is that it have been running for a time the fron
t panel crashes. Is it because the high number of elements I have in the front panel ?
To give you more information I tell you that the processes of saving, loading, decreasing and increasing the pressure on the line are event cases of an event structure.
The front panel consists of a tab structure, 20 controls and indicators and a cluster consisting of 9 controls.

No error take place. By crashing I mean that after a period of time the frontpanel control´s response to inputs of the user become so slow that after a short time there´s no response at all.
The problem is that I´ve been dealing with this problem in this aplication for quite a while and although I´ve optimized, I think, its execution time and the way it deals with memory usage this problem persists.
Since most of the operations performed by it depends on inputs by the user I´ve decided to use an event structure to manage them and decided to load the VIs related to them dynamically into memory to somewoh optimize memory usage.
In order to make things more clear to you I´m sending you a zipped file containing pics that completely describe the frontpane
l ad the block diagram of the appliction.
Any help you can give will be deeply appreciated.
PS : I´ve tried to sent the zipped file but awindow appeared notifying me that Developer Exchange is down for maintenance. If you need any more information to clarify what I mean please let me know.
Sincerely,
Giovani Marcelino Nesi
DRV Desenvolvimento e Representação Virtual Ltda.

Does the number of file in the virtual folder affect the performance?

Will the ucm performance decrease, if I change the number of the folder is greater than 10000?

Performance will definitely decrease. The main reason for this is that when opening a folder you have huge resultsets that need to be processed. As there is no pagination (you see all the items in the folder on one screen) the 'pages' that are sent over HTTP can get very large/slow.
Personally I would seriously question your strategy. How useful is it to have a folder with 10,000 items?
Tim

Do big includes affect the performance of a program?

Hello,
We are using an include (CRM_DIRECT) which has about 45 other includes (sub includes), the includes containts constants. We are wondering if it is better to include a sub include, when using a constant from only that sub include, then using the global include? Does this make a difference in performance or optimizes SAP this when compiling?
With regards,
Frank Roels

Hi,
if you are using a "big include" then it will be declaring lots of tables,structures,types etc...which needs memory allocation.Directly including a parent may reduce work but again memory wastage will cost you performance in overall running time....
Regards
Byju

Antivirus affects the performance

Hi,
I installed Trend Micro Anti-virus on the Terminal Server and only 5 users could work their. But when I removed the antivirus everiting is fine with the performence. How can I setup SAP B1 with this antivirus or maybe we have to work with another antivirus?
Thanks,
Olga

Ok. Lets see:
In the server machine that hosts SB1 server tools (license service) you should open ports like: 30000, 30001.
In the server hosting SQL Server, you should open: 1433, 1434.
In DC server, ports like: 443, 42424, 2725, 2393.
If you have TS installed in the same SB1 server, no extra ports are needed, but, if the TS server is other different to SB1 server, then you should open the ports required by SB1 client application.
Check if the Trend Micro Firewall allows to create exceptions by application name, so, you only have to search for the application executable file and select it.
Check too, if Windows Firewall is still active, if so, you could try to disable it, or add exception rules by sellecting the application name or browsing the executable files.
I can't remember the other ports asociated to other Server Tools services. I think they could be finded in the SB1 System administration documentation. However, if the frewall allow to create exception rules using the name or executable files, no port is needed to do that. Only add the aplications and firewall handles the ports automatically.
Best Regards.

Is there anyway to limit the number of users?

Very straightforward, is there anyway to limit the number of users of the Airport Express for only a certain amount of time during the day?
There are certain periods during the day that I don't want my cousin to use the wifi, but the only way I can think of is to change the password and only type in the password for him when he needs it, however this is very troublesome? Is there a more sufficient way to do this?
Thank you.

You have the ability using Timed Access to establish daily time limits (or no time limits) for each computer that will be connecting to the AirPort Express.
Open Macintosh HD > Applications > Utilities > AirPort Utility
Click Manual Setup
Click the Access Control tab located under the row of icons
For MAC Access Control select Timed Access
For complete instructions, click the Help menu at the top of the screen and then click AirPort Utility Help. Enter the following phrase into the search box:
controlling access to your wireless network

Number of user sessions in the Application Server for a config entry

Hi All
I am using 10g AS, with 9i DB.
My requirement is that -
i need to find the total number of users of the application in any moment, and to
display that information to the users. say, config=abc, super users need to find all
those who are using the link from the application itself.
I can see that information from the 10 g Enterprise Manager -> Forms -> User Sessions.
But is there any means of transfering that information to forms.
Can this be done by using PJC's ?
Please post your solutions/suggestions
Thanks in Advance
Deepa

Any help/ideas Please
Deepa

Long-running transactions and the performance penalty

If I change the orch or scope Transaction Type to "Long Running" and do not create any other transaction scopes inside, I'm getting this warning:
warning X4018: Performance Warning: marking service '***' as a longrunning transaction is not necessary and incurs the performance penalty of an extra commit
I didn't find any description of such penalties.
So my questions to gurus:
Does it create some additional persistence point(s) / commit(s) in LR orchestration/scope?
Where are these persistence points happen, especially in LR orchestration?
Leonid Ganeline [BizTalk MVP] BizTalk Development Architecture

The wording may make it sound so but IMHO, if during the build of an orchestration we get carried away with scope shapes we end up with more persistence points which do affect the performance so one additional should not make soo much of a difference. It
may have been put because of end-user feed back where people may have opted for long running transactions without realizing about performance overheads and in subsequent performance optimization sessions with Microsoft put it on the product enhancement list
as "provide us with an indication if we're to incurr performance penalties". A lot of people design orchestration like they write code (not saying that is a bad thing) where they use the scope shape along the lines of a try catch block and what with
Microsoft marketing Long Running Transactions/Compensation blocks as USP's for BizTalk, people did get carried away into using them without understanding the implications.
Not saying that there is no additional persistence points added but just wondering if adding one is sufficient to warrant the warning. But if I nest enough scope shapes and mark them all as long-running, they may add up.
So when I looked at things other than persistence points, I tried to think on how one might implement the long running transaction (nested, incorporating atomic, etc), would you be able to leverage the .Net transaction object (something the pipeline
use and execute under) or would that model not handle the complexities of the Long Running Transaction which by very definiton span across days/months and keeping .Net Transaction objects active or serialization/de-serialization into operating context will
cause more issues.
Regards.

Is custom views effect the performance of EBS?

We are using EBS r12.0.6,, database 0g R2.
Our developers are writting some views to sumarize the data and those views are using in custom reports.
Is this effect the EBS performance?

Technically, just doing select 1 from dual will affect the performance. The impact may be a pico second but it will certainly be there.
My point is that it is very difficult to answer this question without knowing the kind of views and the queries that are run on the views. It is best to analyze the report request to identify performance impact (if any).
views to sumarize the data Keep in mind, for some summary type of reports, it might be better to write materialized views instead of regular views OR do the summarization on a data w/h
instance or a reporting instance if you have one.
Sandeep Gandhi

Delegated Admin and Number of Users

Recently we deleted about 3K users using: commadmin domain purge, and while
it appears to have successfully deleted the users -- ldapsearch doesn't yield any
output. The lower number of users is NOT reflected in the field "Number of Users"
on the Delegated Admin page. It still shows the same number of users >11K we
"had" prior to the deletion process.
Any ideas to explain this discrepancy?
-- Bob

rkbunca wrote:
Recently we deleted about 3K users using: commadmin domain purge, and while
it appears to have successfully deleted the users -- ldapsearch doesn't yield any
output. The lower number of users is NOT reflected in the field "Number of Users"
on the Delegated Admin page. It still shows the same number of users >11K we
"had" prior to the deletion process.
Any ideas to explain this discrepancy?The number of users displayed in the DA GUI is recorded in the "sunNumUsers" attribute associated with the domain e.g.
dn: o=aus.sun.com,dc=aus,dc=sun,dc=com
sunNumUsers: 11
This is to avoid having to do an ldapsearch across the domain to get a count. You can manually update this attribute to get the number back-in-sync.
The commadmin domain purge should have updated this value -- I couldn't find any pre-existing bugs to explain why it didn't happen in your case. I suggest you log a support case to get this looked into further.
You may also want to check your directory audit logs to see if an attempt was made to update this attribute but failed for some reason.
Regards,
Shane.

Is number of users affect the performance?

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for