Is thre any row limit in JDBC ?

Hi all .
I have a DB Table that I use for logging in my application .
And as you know a log table can have many rows ..
In my application an administrator can
se the log .
So my question is :
Is there any limit to the rows returned from a query .
I am afraid that in future my program throws an
OutOfMemory error or any other error.
Is there any way to get best performance in such situation ?
Thanks.
Omar Dawod.

> I can start , or give me sample codes ?
Well there are many threads in this forums addressing the same issue if you are still not satisfied use google by puttin the right key words...
http://onesearch.sun.com/search/onesearch/index.jsp?qt=pagination&qp_name=null&subCat=siteforumid%3Ajava48&site=dev&dftab=siteforumid%3Ajava48&chooseCat=javaall&col=developer-forums
http://onesearch.sun.com/search/onesearch/index.jsp?qt=pagination&qp_name=null&subCat=siteforumid%3Ajava45&site=dev&dftab=siteforumid%3Ajava45&chooseCat=javaall&col=developer-forums
http://www.google.co.in/search?hl=en&q=pagination+jdbc&meta=
> About the "pagination" , It would be very nice to
include "pagination" ,
but does JDBC offer this to me
It is not a readmade feature u may design it as per ur convinice......
and this is because it is highly application(DB) specific.
Just to quote an example....
Say
select COUNT(*) from TableName
gives you total number of records....
in a database like oracle... U can restructure the query like the one below
select * from TableName WHERE rownum >= [LIMIT1] and rownum <= [LIMIT2]
where LIMIT1 < LIMIT2 <= COUNT(*)
fix a value for [LIMIT2] - [LIMIT1] depending on SYSPARAMETERS.....
U can design a bean which does this task for U....
In similar ways different Databases offer a similar functionality
MYSQL --> use of LIMIT & OFFSET clause
SQL SERVER 2005 ---> rownum()
and so on....
Other than this approch there are few other methods by which one can acheive it.
Please go through the link below
http://www.devx.com/Java/Article/21383/1763
> any way to limit the rows in JDBC .
U can do it to certain extent Using ResultSet.setFetchSize(int rows) method as said by my fellow forum mate cotton.m.

Similar Messages

Is there any purchase limit?i buy something for three to four times and my purchase can't complete any more

Is there any purchase limit?i buy something for three to four times and my purchase can't complete any more

That would be the choice of the Game developer, not Apple. But it seems unlikely.

Is there any session limit in operator?

Hi,
I am trying to run a loop thru a query, like " select col1 from table1", then in this loop I am trying to call a scenario, like : OdiStartScen -SCEN_NAME=TESTEXTRACT -LOG_LEVEL=5 -SYNC_MODE=1 "-project.var1=#col" , the query should return about 7000 rows, that means the scenario should run for about 7000 times, but the fact is in operator is only run about 60 times, and no new session produced, and the main loop is hanging there?
Is there any session limit for the operator? or any other possible resovle method for this?
Thanks

Hi ,
You can limit the number of session u can view in the Operator.
In Operator--- > File --- > User parameters = In this you can see operator display limit. In tat you can set ....
Hope this helps !
Thanks
Ananda

TDMS Excel Add-in Does not support new Excel 2007 Row Limit

First off I would like to say the TDM/TMDS format is really useful. It allows you to do all kinds of things that would be a real pain if you tried to do it with tab delimited spreadsheets. You can format data into excel sheets for analysis with seperate tabs and channel names over the columns and the whole nine yards. You can even throw error messages into the properties that show up on the first tab.
The problem occurs when the user is working with really large files. Excel 2003 and all previous versions of Excel have limits of 65,536 rows by 256 columns. Until the latest version of the TDM Excel Add-in if you tried to import files larger than this it would throw an error and wouldn't create any file at all. Now it imports a file and you specify the index, which is so much better.
Excel 2007 supports 1,048,576 rows by 16,384 columns! This is really useful. But the current version of the TDM Excel Add-In does not support the new row limit. Is there any way we can get a version of this for 2007 that supports the new row limits? It would be cool if the Add-in could auto-detect the version and change the import limits accordingly but that may be too much to ask. Has anyone else run into these problems?
My client would like to record hour long files at 200Hz all day long. Thats 720,000 rows of data per file. Yes, thats a lot but excel can handle it. The TDMS importer cannot. Of course there are work arounds and we will have to use one if a new version of the TDM Excel Add-in is not made soon. Is there a new version coming? Please say yes.
[will work for kudos]
Solved!
Go to Solution.

I redownloaded the file. I couldnt figure out how to completely uninstall the verison of the TDM importer already installed, so I just tried to install the one i downloaded. The installer said "no software will be installed or removed" and I had to click cancel because there was no next option.
I tried to import the data again with the importer and got the same 'selective import' dialog box again, limiting me to the 65,535 rows.
Here is what I am getting.
How do I uninstall the add-in so that I may reinstall it?
I uploaded a copy of one of my tdms files to the ftp.ni.com/incoming directory for you to download and attempt to import.
File: "442732.zip" size: 82.2 mb
A little more information about the tdms file
The data is 14 columns of single precision float and is about 720k rows. There are four sections (sheets in the same excel document) with the data converted differently in each tab/section. The data is the same amount in each section as well. There are also a couple sections listing the constants and scalars used to convert the data, as well as the typical first page of tdms information about the data.
[will work for kudos]

Row Limit on Pivot Tables

Is there any way that we can set a row limit on Pivot Tables?
Thanks,
Bala.

Limits are set in the instanceconfig.xml file...
ANtonio
Bexpert, Brazil
SIebel/OBI Consulting & Training

Altering row limit from 5,000 to 1,000,000

I'm using Oracle SQL Developer Version 1.1.3. I have used the menu to get 1,000,000 rows as the result of my query but nothing appears. When I reduce that amount by a factor of 10 (but not more than 100,000), many data rows are suppressed. Please assist.SQL Developer

Jeff Smith Sqldev Pm-Oracle wrote:
>>Neither Oracle nor Sql Developer 'suppresses' rows
Yes, we do - check your worksheet preferences.
Max rows to print in a script: Limits the number of rows displayed.
Max lines in script output: Limits the number of lines output.
If you want a file, use the spool command and we'll write everything to the file regardless of that setting.
Neither of those 'suppress' any rows from a worksheet query for me.
Maybe we are talking about different things?
I read OPs post as performing a simple query in a worksheet:
I have used the menu to get 1,000,000 rows as the result of my query but nothing appears. When I reduce that amount by a factor of 10 (but not more than 100,000), many data rows are suppressed.
I set both 'max rows' and 'max lines' values to 50 and exited then relaunched sql dev.
I used a worksheet and a simple SELECT * query to select ALL rows from a table with 4000+ rows. The result window shows them being fetched 50 at a time and NONE of them are suppressed as more and more groups of 50 (my array fetch size value in preferences) are fetched. and the result window fetches them 50 at a time just like the fetch value is set to.
No rows are being suppressed. If I do a CTRL-END and go to the END of the result set I see the end of ALL 4000+ rows - no limit of 50 and the count shows the correct total number of rows.
I don't know if OP is doing the 'script' thing you refer to - don't know for sure. The usual thing I see is someone not seeing a particular row in that first 20/30/etc that gets returned and wondering where it is. Usually it is because they think that a query will return the rows in the same order that the user inserted them - which it won't of course.

Row limit in declarative list view web part

Hi,
Imagine you are in a scenario where you develop a custom web template or a site definition. Page Layouts with web part zones are being provisioned and out of them, decoratively web part pages are being created and populated with web parts. So something like:
<Elements xmlns="http://schemas.microsoft.com/sharepoint/">
<Module Name="XXXProjectPages" Url="$Resources:osrvcore,List_Pages_UrlName;" Path="" SetupPath="FEATURES\XXX_Intranet_PMO_PageLayouts\">

<File Url="FullPageLayout\XXXFullPageLayout.aspx" Name="Default.aspx" Type="GhostableInLibrary" IgnoreIfAlreadyExists="FALSE" ReplaceContent="TRUE" Level="Published">
<Property Name="Title" Value="Team & Collaboration" />
<Property Name="ContentType" Value="$Resources:cmscore,contenttype_page_name;" />
<Property Name="PublishingPageLayout" Value="~SiteCollection/_catalogs/masterpage/XXXFullPageLayout.aspx, ~SiteCollection/_catalogs/masterpage/XXXFullPageLayout.aspx" />

<View List="Lists/Announcements" BaseViewID="102" WebPartZoneID="wpZone1" WebPartOrder="2">
<![CDATA[
<WebPart xmlns="http://schemas.microsoft.com/WebPart/v2">
<Assembly>Microsoft.SharePoint, Version=15.0.0.0, Culture=neutral, PublicKeyToken=71e9bce111e9429c</Assembly>
<TypeName>Microsoft.SharePoint.WebPartPages.ListViewWebPart</TypeName>
<Title>Latest News</Title>
<FrameType>TitleBarOnly</FrameType>
</WebPart>
]]>
</View>
For simplicity, let's assume that we are working with instances of OOB list definitions, such as Announcements or Document Library. So far so good. And now the question...
In my understanding if you want to do something as simple as limiting the number of items returned, or specifying a custom view criteria (filter/sorting/grouping, whatever) or just remove the toolbar, you have to go as far as provisioning an ENTIRE LIST
DEFINITION, defining your custom View in it (which declares the toolbar type, row limit and View) and then reference this new View by its BaseViewID. Is that correct?
Is there really no other, simpler way, of 'provisioning' and referencing a new view, to an existing list instance, along with the
Module -> File -> View element? I see a couple of logical options:
1) I would imagine such metadata could be stored in the web part and not the actual list. i.e. the web parts sends a CAML query to the list, based on the View metadata stored in it.
2) As we know, when you Edit page and configure the View for a List View Web Part on the page, that view is stored as a new hidden view in the actual list (i.e. if you have two list view web parts that reference that list, you will have two additional hidden
views). Then why can't we provision such (hidden) view along with the List View WebPart when we declare it and create the page? It could be created on first access of the page, or during the page
provisioning.
Another option could be the XmlDefinition property of the XsltListViewWebPart, but
apparently it is being ignored. I have also tried using the 'CustomSchema' property of the ListInstance, but it totally makes no sense because:
a) You cannot define more than one view in it, i.e. you have to override the OOB view that comes with the definition (lol?!)
b) You are supposed to overwrite the entire list definition, instead of simply upgrading parts of it
So, let me elaborate: if I want to have a <View> (ListViewWebPart) in my Page and this view to have some custom criteria, I have to provision an entire List Definition, is that correct? This is crazy.

Hi Hristo,
According to your description, my understanding is that you want to know if you can use <view> tag in the list view web part to define the row limit of list view web part.
Per my knowledge, you can define rowlimit element in the view element for list view web part directly not necessary to modify the entire list definition.
View Element:
http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/office/ms438338(v=office.15).aspx
Also, if you want to do more customization, you can still orverride the xslt.
More reference:
http://www.glynblogs.com/2011/04/overriding-the-presentation-of-an-xslt-list-view-web-part.html
http://unorig.com/2012/08/15/format-a-list-web-part-with-xslt/
Best Regards
Forum Support
Please remember to mark the replies as answers if they help and unmark them if they provide no help. If you have feedback for TechNet Subscriber Support, contact
[email protected]
Zhengyu Guo
TechNet Community Support

SQL Query (PL/SQL Function Body returning SQL query) doesn't return any row

I have a region with the following type:
SQL Query (PL/SQL Function Body returning SQL query).
In a search screen the users can enter different numbers, separated by an ENTER.
I want to check these numbers by replacing the ENTER, which is CHR(13) || CHR(10) I believe, with commas. And then I can use it like this: POD IN (<<text>>).
It's something like this:
If (:P30_POD Is Not Null) Then
v_where := v_where || v_condition || 'POD IN (''''''''||REPLACE(''' || :P30_POD || ''', CHR(13) || CHR(10), '','')||'''''''''')';
v_condition := ' AND ';
End If;
But the query doesn't return any rows.
I tried to reproduce it in Toad:
select * from asx_worklistitem
where
POD IN (''''||REPLACE('541449200000171813'||CHR(13) || CHR(10)||'541449206006341366', CHR(13) || CHR(10), ''',''')||'''')
==> This is the query that does't return any rows
select (''''||REPLACE('541449200000171813'||CHR(13) || CHR(10)||'541449206006341366', CHR(13) || CHR(10), ''',''')||'''')
from dual;
==> This returns '541449200000171813','541449206006341366'
select * from asx_worklistitem
where pod in ('541449200000171813','541449206006341366');
==> and when I copy/paste this in the above query, it does return my rows.
So why does my first query doesn't work?
Doe anyone have any idea?
Kind regards,
Geert
Message was edited by:
Zorry

Thanks for the help.
I made it work, but via the following code:
If (:P30_POD Is Not Null) Then
v_pods := REPLACE(:P30_POD, CHR(13) || CHR(10));
v_where := v_where || v_condition || 'POD IN (';
v_counter := 1;
WHILE (v_counter < LENGTH(v_pods)) LOOP
v_pod := SUBSTR(v_pods, v_counter, 18);
IF (v_counter <> 1) THEN
v_where := v_where || ',';
END IF;
v_where := v_where || '''' || v_pod || '''';
v_counter := v_counter + 18;
END LOOP;
v_where := v_where || ')';
v_condition := ' AND ';
End If;But now I want to make an update of all the records that correspond to this search criteria. I can give in a status via a dropdownlist and that I want to update all the records that correspond to one of these POD's with that status.
For a region you can build an SQL query via PL/SQL, but for a process you only have a PL/SQL block. Is the only way to update all these records by making a loop and make an update for every POD that is specified.
Because I think this will have a lot of overhead.
I would like to make something like a multi row update in an updateable report, but I want to specify the status from somewhere else. Is this possible?

Any reported problems using jdbc over a WAN?

If im trying to connect to a Database that's on a WAN will I experience any issues in using jdbc to connect and execute queries to that database?
I know problems would come up if my wan network is slow, but has jdbc been able to handle long distance database queries? timeout values?

but why?
is it because of security? If a company had a database with your personal info hanging out on the Web for anyone to query without any validation or security, how would you feel about it?
design pattern issues? It's just good layered design.
just doesnt make sense?Not in my opinion.
have u experienced/heard of any problems of
connecting to a database over a WAN and executing
queries?You don't say anything about who the client is. If the database is behind a firewall, outside clients shouldn't be able to access the port where the listener is running. Only port 80 should be open on that firewall.
So you either write a servlet that listens on port 80 for HTTP requests from a browser-based client OR you ask your firewall admin to punch a hole in the firewall and open up the port on which your database is listening for queries and use a Swing client.
If s/he agrees to do it, quit immediately. It means your company doesn't know anything about security.
%

Trying to access row values in a table which does not have any rows yet

try{
                         MappedRecord importParams = recordFactory.createMappedRecord("CONTAINER_OF_IMPORT_PARAMS");
                         IFunction function1 = client.getFunctionsMetaData().getFunction(funModGetDet);
                         IStructureFactory strucFact = interaction.retrieveStructureFactory();
                         response.write("try2 :"+pnumber);
                        IRecord structure = (IRecord) strucFact.getStructure(function1.getParameter("PERNR_TAB").getStructure());
                         response.write("try111 :"+pnumber);
                         structure.setString("PERNR",pnumber);
I am getting the following error "Trying to access row values in a table which does not have any rows yet " where PERNR_TAB is a table containing field "PERNR".
Can anybody help me out?

Please re-post this question in the appropriate forum. It seems to have nothing to do with Web Dynpro.

What is the difference in the System Event triggers: Any queue limit set to zero and System queue reached its job limit

My co-worker and I are not sure what the difference between Any queue limit set to zero and System queue reached its job limit are in the System Events.

Hi jlayton,
System queue limit is the sum of all queue limits you have defined. For example, if you have a system queue limit of, say, 100 -- queue A has 50 jobs active, and queue B also has 50 jobs active, then you will receive an alert System queue reached its job limit since it is set to 100.
Any queue limit set to zero. Note, this may also include the System queue. For example, if you want to gracefully stop Tidal, you may want to set system queue = 0 so that there are no active jobs. When you do this, you will receive an alert queue limit set to zero.
BR,
Derrick Au

Mapping is done ....but it is not inserting any rows

hi,
Mapping is validated successfully.
We will deploy the code in the backend by generating the code.
When the package is created and executed It.It shows me procedure completed succesfully...But it will not insert any rows.
I am unable to find the reason for it.Please help me in solving this.
Thanks,
kiran

what is your owb version
how many rows are there in source
what is your filter criteria and are any rows returned through simple sql but using that filter criteria.
what is the loading type of your target table
the ebst way is to debug the map and find out, i wouldnt recomment using backend code to debug as the ebst option since debug facility is availabe in owb, if that doesnt work then probably you can try using the package code.
Edited by: Darthvader-647181 on Nov 18, 2008 1:54 AM

Report is exceeding row limit

Hi,
I have a report in BW and when I execute it, it is going beyond excel limit i.e. exceeding 65000 entries in excel and I am unable to see the whole report. Please let me know, how do I go about solving this issue.
Thanks & Regards

Several possible solutions:
- Run the report for a smaller set of data (e.g., 3 months instead of a year).
- Run the query on the Web, where there is no restriction on the number of rows, then export to a CSV file.
- Upgrade to Excel 2007, which has a much higher row limit (1 million).
Hope this helps...
Bob

10000 row limit in Portal Reports

Portal Team,
Will the 10000 row limit be ever removed
from the Portal Reports ? This limit
is pretty silly (at least let the developers set a limit, instead of hard coding it )
thanks

Bala,
3.0.7.6.2 on NT.
My question doesn't pertain to number of rows on a page. It pertains to the total number of rows that a query will return i.e if you have a table with 11,0000 records your query will return only 10,000 (or 10001) records.
My query in SQL*PLus returns more than
10,000 rows (okay I did not spool the output, just did a count(*) ). The same query
minus the count(*), but with columns , as a report gave 10001 rows. I base this on the following: The total row count on the report says Rows 1 to <n> of 10001. I must admit that I did not have the patience to paginate through to the end to see if 10,000 was the limit. I did go back to the wwv_advanced* package in WebDB (since its code is unwrapped) and saw that there was a global variable g_max_rows with a value of 10000.
Not sure if this is carried over to Portal.
The *render_report package in WebDB does a
check to see if total row count is >= to g_max_rows or the dyn. sql cursor returned nothing. This is a prob.
Would appreciate some feedback,
Thanks

Change partition type and 2 billion rows limit.

Hello experts ,
My DB's 1 table has 4 billion records , so I'm using range partition for this , I devided 10 partitions.
I want to change this range partition to hash partition.
In this time , I think I should do following .
1. execute "alter table bigtable merge partitions";
2. execute "alter table bigtable partition by hash (column1) partitons 10"
I think it will be correspond to 2 billion row limit in sequence 1.
How to execute re-partitioning in this case ? Should I unload current data to file or sometiong and load from this
Regards,
Jim

You can change the partitioning type without merging the partitions, and as you said you would hit the limit even if you did that. I would recommend stopping the SLT master job (if this is fed from SLT), then performing this operation. It will clearly take a good chunk of time to do so.
Also to note, hash will simply work on the column values that you partition on, you can't really guarantee that there will equal distributions across the 10 partitions.
Regards,
Justin

Is thre any row limit in JDBC ?

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for