Issue with extractor 0BBP_TD_SC_1

Hi All,
I have to add preferred vendor to the datasource 0BBP_TD_SC_1 in SRM 4.00. The two fields for preferred vendor are available in the extract structure but are marked with attribute value 'A' which is for hidden by SAP.
There is an OSS note to fix this but it is applicable for higher versions of SRM systems. Hence I want to extract and update the preferred vendor using user exit.
Can anyone please let me know if there is any other way to fix this issue?.
Regards,

Suresh,
Did you solve this issue?
What is the error message you are getting in the monitor?
thanks
Esan

Similar Messages

Issue with extractor

Hello All,
After the service pack and enhancement packs in CRM, the quotations extractor is pulling '0' records.
Kindly suggest what could be wrong if any one has any idea about the issue.
Vicky

Hello,
If you did not check yet. Please check the Transactions: " BWA1,BWA5,BWA7 SMQ1, SMQ2, SMW01 "for data availability.
Step2
Please replicate and reloade newly activated datasource and transfer rule.
Regards
Steven.
Edited by: Steven Mathew on Sep 5, 2009 9:43 AM

Issue with the SNP Extractor in APO-BI.

Hi Experts,
I am facing an issue with SNP Extractor. I have a SNP Extractor in APO system, and it has 4 datasources connected to it.Out of the 4 datasources, we are getting display of records for relevant selections in only one data source, but for the other three data sources, given what ever be the selections, it gives a message saying " 0 records available ".
Please could you suggest, what can be the issue and also indicate a solution to resolve it. Do we need to apply any SAP Note to resolve the issue?? And where can we see the Current Support Package that is installed in the system??
Replies in this regard, would be very helpful.
Thanks and Regards,
Bhargava

Hi,
you can see the Current Support Package in this way:
Log on in your BW system --> System --> Status --> Component Information (hand lens) -->
near the SAP_BW software component and release, there is the level (for example 0006).

Performance issue with BW Extractor 0CRM_SRV_PROCESS_H

Hi There,
We have a serious performance issue with BW extractor 0CRM_SRV_PROCESS_H in CRM . We recently applied SAP Note: 1330249 to optimise the performance, Even after applying the note it remains slow, Please can any one update the solution if they had same issue with this Extractor or know about this issue.
Thanks,
R

Hi Ramesh,
There are some instructions available in note 1330249 that shoul help you.
I don't know what is the current release in the system, but there are corrections to be implemented by Tcode SNOTE and also manual steps(in table SMOFPARSFA).
I hope it contributes.
Regards,
Sinara Moraes

Issue with 0HRPOSITION_ATTR extractor

We are live with BW HR application and having issue with 0HRPOSITION master data. We are extracting data from SAP using 0HRPOSITION_ATTR datasource. I noticed that data is not maintained correctly in master data tables in BW and giving us incorrect results in reporting. Consider below mentioned scenario:
Position A created as vacant on 04/01/2006 with start date (BEGDA/ Valid from) as 04/01/2006 and End date (ENDDA/ Valid to) as 12/31/9999 and is vacant. Below mentioned entry is shown under maintain master data for 0HRPOSITION in BW:
Position Valid To   Valid From Position Vacant
A        03/31/2006 01/01/1000
A        12/31/9999 04/01/2006        X
Position A is now delimited on 09/15/2006 as its no more required. In SAP, position has record only from 04/01/2006 till 09/15/2006 as vacant. When record is extracted in BW, it creates below mentioned entry in master data table.
Position Valid To    Valid From Position Vacant
A         03/31/2006 01/01/1000
A         09/15/2006 04/01/2006        X
A         12/31/9999 09/16/2006        X
Entry 09/16- 12/31 is incorrect as position doesnt exist for this duration. If we report on 0HRPOSTION with key date as 09/30/2006, it shows position A as vacant though position no longer exists.
Has anyone come across this situation. any help is greatly appreciated.
Thanks,
Milind

Hi
I have nt worked with this data source.
1)Is your data source delta enabled?
2)Try running RSA3 and check for record which is not coming fine. If in RSA3 record is fine then check calculations(if any ) in update/transfer rule.
Let me know if it helps..
Sorabh
Assign point if it helps**
Message was edited by: Sorabh Arora

Performance issues with 0CO_OM_WBS_1

We use BW3.5 & R/3 4.7 and encounter huge performance issues with 0CO_OM_WBS_1? Always having to do a full load involving approx 15M records even though there are on the average 100k new records since previous load. This takes a longtime.
Is there a way to delta-enable this datasource?

Hi,
This DS is not delta enabled and you can only do a full load. For a delta enabled one, you need to use 0CO_OM_WBS_6. This works as other Financials extractors, as it has a safety delta (configurable, default 2 hours, in table BWOM_SETTINGS).
What you should do is maybe, use the WBS_6 as a delta and only extract full loads for WBS_1 for shorter durations.
As you must have an ODS for WBS_1 at the first stage, I would suggest do a full load only for posting periods that are open. This will reduce the data load.
You may also look at creating your own generic data source with delta; if you are clear on the tables and logic used.
cheers...

Issue with 0hrposition master data

We are extracting data from SAP using 0HRPOSITION_ATTR datasource. I noticed that data is not maintained correctly in master data tables in BW and giving us incorrect results in reporting. Consider below mentioned scenario:
Position A created as vacant on 04/01/2006 with start date (BEGDA/ Valid from) as 04/01/2006 and End date (ENDDA/ Valid to) as 12/31/9999 and is vacant. Below mentioned entry is shown under maintain master data for 0HRPOSITION in BW:
Position Valid To Valid From Position Vacant
A 03/31/2006 01/01/1000
A 12/31/9999 04/01/2006 X
Position A is now delimited on 09/15/2006 as its no more required. In SAP, position has record only from 04/01/2006 till 09/15/2006 as vacant. When record is extracted in BW, it creates below mentioned entry in master data table.
Position Valid To Valid From Position Vacant
A 03/31/2006 01/01/1000
A 09/15/2006 04/01/2006 X
A 12/31/9999 09/16/2006 X
Entry 09/16- 12/31 is incorrect as position doesnt exist for this duration. If we report on 0HRPOSTION with key date as 09/30/2006, it shows position A as vacant though position no longer exists.
Has anyone come across this situation. any help is greatly appreciated.
Kamal
P.S: Milind Rane...I was searching through the forums and came across your post.I would appreciate if you could let me know how you solved this issue...
Message was edited by:
Kamal K

HI KK
I have a similar issue. Can you please let me know how this Issue with 0HRPOSITION_ATTR extractor was resolved. In my case i have incorrect data in BW when reporting is done. THrough the extractor untill the PSA i have the correct records coming but in the master data 0HRPOSITION i have incorrect records.
Please help.
Thanks
Hari
Message was edited by:
SAPCOOL

SAP BI 7.0 Transport issue with HR Structural Authorization DSO

Hi,
I am trying to transport HR Structural Authorization DSO Objects in BI 7.0 from Dev to QA system. The Data sources are 0PA_DS02 and 0PA_DS03. ( I am sure that there are lots of changes in Authrorization concept in BI 7.0),.
1. Please suggest me if I need to make any changes and tests before moving these authorization objects to QA system.
2. Also, do I need to take any pre-cautions while activating business content objects 0TCTAUTH and 0TCTAUTH_T (Datasources look like are from 3.x) as I am getting issue with the activation of the transfer structure for these objects?
Thanks a lot for your valuable inputs.
Regards
Paramesh
Edited by: paramesh kumar on May 5, 2009 12:45 AM

Hi Paramesh.
You can use the DSOs 0PA_DS02 and 0PA_DS03 in BI7.0 as well. You just need to use the new generation of analysis authorizations in transaction RSECADMIN.
You can use 0TCTAUTH and 0TCTAUTH_T in BI7.0, however we have experienced som problems with the 0TCTAUTH_T extractor, which dumped because of a poorly designed SELECT statement that was unable to cope with 10000 records. We have replaced it with a generic data source that uses table RSECTEXT directly.
Regards,
Lars

Issue with 2LIS_11_VAITM

Hi,
we are extracting sales related information from ECC through 2LIS_11_VAHDR & 2LIS_11_VAITM to the BW Evironment. but last few delta runs we are missing new/chanaged records from the VBAK/VBAP.
I am not able to understand why we are missing these documents in the the standard extractor. this was working fine till last week and never had any issues with the missing records.
I have tried to run RSA3 in ECC , but i am not able to get this records in ECC while running the extractor in Full update mode.
please suggest how to resolve the issue.
Regards,
Gowrisankar Nk

Durgesh,
I have checked with the functional team and they informed, while submitting the sales orders it ran in to Idoc errors, then they have manually processed this sales order via we21.
Moreover there are quite few documents like this are missing in RSA3 Extraction itself and all this documents are from one paritcular date(02/18/2012)
How we can pull this missing records to BW, (i.e. re-running the set up table for the missing records and run the repair full update to BW, is this right way ? if we do whats the pros and cons ?)
Regards,
Gowrisankar Nk

Issue with 0SRM_TD_IV data source delta

Hi experts,
I have an issue with the invoices numbers not updated correctly when one of invoice item is deleted in SRM.
For example:
In SRM:
Invoice number: 50001168
Invoice item : 1, quantity: 30 - deleted ( deletion indicator - x)
Invoice item : 2, quantity: 4
Invoice item : 3, quantity: 7
In standard extractor (0SRM_TD_IV) RSA3 : exactly same as SRM data.
In standard DSO (0SRIV_D3) : only invoice number and invoice item one is present, which suppose to be deleted in BI.
Invoice number: 50001168
Invoice item : 1, quantity: 30
When I did the full repair for this invoice number from SRM. I got all the 3 invoice items. It did not overwrite invoice item 1, which is deleted in SRM. the way it works in SRM is, it didn't delete the invoice item but flaged with the deletion indicator x.
Know every thing look good up to extractor RSA3. what should I do know to fix this issue? I see that we don't have tranformation rules in BI 7.0 insted we are using trnasfer rules and update rule. Please let me know.
Thanks,
Chandra

Hi Chandu,
The way I understand your issue is that,
when you do a full upload, you get the information correctly in RSA3 and DSO.
when you run a delta, you are not getting all the line items.
1) Please check whether there are any relevant SAP notes for this extractor to fix this delta issue.
2) Please check whether there is any code in the update rule or transfer rule that deletes the missing line item
Thanks,
Krishnan

Issues with loads

There has been issues with loads to a Sales cube. The issue is that delta loads for the first few days in January have been lost (also deleted from PSA). I wanted to check the following before I make a suggestion:
1. Data up until the end of last year is available and okay
2. Create a copy of the original Sales cube
3. Generate a DataSource from the original cube
4. Load up until the end of last year to the new cube via the Datamart
5. Load from Sales LO extractors, carrying out the init from the beginning of this year to 9999 into the new copy
6. Load Deltas into the new copy
Thanks

Hi,
I hope You had taken no restriction on the date when you were doing delta init.thats why you are getting delta for all records.It would continue in futue also.
We can easily find out the sales document number which was created somewhere in December ending( Iam not saying the document should be last document of the December). Use that documetn number to fil the setup table as starting document number.
Now do selective deletion of the data from the cube which has Calnder day >= 01.01.2007. Now Do repair request with selection on calender day(or the field which is used to map to Calnder day) with the range 01.01.2007,12.12.9999 .
Next time when you are doing delta load to the cube, it will bring the records as nothng was happend.
Ofcourse as Roberto mentioned ,it is possible only in a specific case: if you are sure that a every sales document created before 31/12/06 cannot change anymore after that date !
What ever the date you feel comfotable (i.e you feel that the records which were created before that date were not changed in after Jan 01) instead of 01.01.2007 in the above explanations.
With rgds,
Anil Kumar Sharma .P
Message was edited by:
Anil Kumar Sharma

Issues with Creative Cloud for teams deployment workflow

The Adobe Creative Cloud for teams IT Deployment Guide lists out steps for IT admins to deploy the CS6 applications and then have their end-users license the trial software with their Adobe IDs once they have been invited to the team. There are two major issues with this document.
First, the media that is on the FTP is not for North American English. We are working to get that posted on the FTP site ASAP. In the meantime, you can find the CS6 MC media from: http://www.adobe.com/downloads/
[Note: Getting media from that page requires the use of the Adobe Download Assistant which is very consumer focused. Sorry about that.]
Second, in order to have the ability to login properly with a Creative Cloud for Teams account the system needs to have the latest copy of Adobe Application Manager installed. If you do not do this step the end user will be prompted for a serial number.
Unfortunately the Adobe Application Manager can’t be packaged with AAMEE nor is it a native installer. I know, I know! Here are the links to the Adobe Application Manager installers:
Windows: http://www.adobe.com/support/downloads/detail.jsp?ftpID=4773
Mac: http://www.adobe.com/support/downloads/detail.jsp?ftpID=4774
It can be installed from command line by:
Win: <Path to Setup.exe>Set-up.exe –mode=silent –action=install
Mac: <path to ASU> /ASU/Install.app/Contents/MacOS/Install –mode=silent –action=install
Jody Rodgers | Sr. Product Manager | Creative Cloud for Enterprise | Adobe Systems

Hi Boncker,
I see that you have an active Subscription under your account . Please launch any of the installed product and when you get the trial prompt , please click on License this software and then Enter the Adobe Id & Password for the account that you have accepted the invite .
Please do let us know if that worked for you or not .
Cheers,
Kartikay Sharma

Issue with magsafe/charging (blinks green, amber, off)

Having a quirky issue with my mid-2009 Macbook Pro.
A month or so ago, I began having an issue with my macbook charging. When the computer is up and running and I plug in the magsafe it will say "Calculating..." and then say "Not Charging" and then switch to battery use. It constantly does this as long as the magsafe is connected. The lights on the magsafe will constantly cycle from green to amber to no light.
At first, it would do it a few times then it would start charging. Now it constantly does this without ever stopping. I was editing video the other day for a while and it never stopped the cycle.
Thinking it was the battery, I took it into the Apple Store last week and got a new battery because it had been saying "Service battery" for a while and the battery would only last about 20 minutes on a charge. So I just thought the battery finally refused to charge.
But the problem still exists.
The magsafe is new (only 3 months old) and here's the quirky thing: the computer will charge if it's asleep (lid closed) or shut down completely. No blinking lights at all. It will charge as long as it's asleep or shut down. So I don't think it's the charger. But as soon as you hit the power button to starting booting up, it will blink.
I have reset the SMC a couple times actually, but no change.
Is there something software/firmware related that I haven't tried? Any insight or suggestions would be greatly appreciated before I take it back to the Apple Store (which is about an hour away).
Thanks!

Try resetting the system management controller
http://support.apple.com/kb/HT3964?viewlocale=en_US
If that did nothing for you, try resetting the NVRAM
https://support.apple.com/kb/HT1379

Issue With Page Break When Sorting is also applied on group

Hi
I am facing an issue with Page break only when I have sorting applied on the grouping that I have in the template.
The following is the sample XML
<ROWSET>
<ROW>
<GRE>org1</GRE>
<ORGANIZATION>Accounts</ORGANIZATION>
<FULL_NAME>test1,</FULL_NAME>
<ELEMENT_NAME>TEST BONUS</ELEMENT_NAME>
<CLASSIFICATION>Supplemental Earnings</CLASSIFICATION>
<RUN_VALUE>250</RUN_VALUE>
<MONTH_VALUE>500</MONTH_VALUE>
<QUARTER_VALUE>500</QUARTER_VALUE>
<YEAR_VALUE>500</YEAR_VALUE>
</ROW>
<ROW>
<GRE>org1</GRE>
<ORGANIZATION>Finance</ORGANIZATION>
<FULL_NAME>test2</FULL_NAME>
<ELEMENT_NAME>VOLUNTARY AD AND D</ELEMENT_NAME>
<CLASSIFICATION>Voluntary Deductions</CLASSIFICATION>
<RUN_VALUE>5.19</RUN_VALUE>
<MONTH_VALUE>10.38</MONTH_VALUE>
<QUARTER_VALUE>10.38</QUARTER_VALUE>
<YEAR_VALUE>10.38</YEAR_VALUE>
</ROW>
<ROW>
<GRE>org1</GRE>
<ORGANIZATION>Finance</ORGANIZATION>
<FULL_NAME>test3</FULL_NAME>
<ELEMENT_NAME>HMO MEDICAL</ELEMENT_NAME>
<CLASSIFICATION>Pre-Tax Deductions</CLASSIFICATION>
<RUN_VALUE>19.67</RUN_VALUE>
<MONTH_VALUE>39.34</MONTH_VALUE>
<QUARTER_VALUE>39.34</QUARTER_VALUE>
<YEAR_VALUE>39.34</YEAR_VALUE>
</ROW>
<ROW>
<GRE>org1</GRE>
<ORGANIZATION>Finance</ORGANIZATION>
<FULL_NAME>test4</FULL_NAME>
<ELEMENT_NAME>PENSION NR DC</ELEMENT_NAME>
<CLASSIFICATION>Pre-Tax Deductions</CLASSIFICATION>
<RUN_VALUE>0</RUN_VALUE>
<MONTH_VALUE>360</MONTH_VALUE>
<QUARTER_VALUE>360</QUARTER_VALUE>
<YEAR_VALUE>360</YEAR_VALUE>
</ROW>
</ROWSET>
In the template I group the data based on CLASSIFICATION and then sort on the same column CLASSIFICATION. I have a page-break applied for every group.
When I generate the PDF, I am not getting the page-breaks for every group. Instead some of them are displayed in the same page.
But when I remove the sorting that I had in the template on the column CLASSIFICATION, I am getting the output in the desired way but not in a sorted order.
kumar

Hi All,
I am using MS-WORD 2007 and BI Publisher desktop 10.1.3.3.3.
When I use split-by-page-break, splitting is performed for every line .. but not for group of lines.
Can anybody throw some light on this?
FYI...
I am using this code:
?if: position() mod 6= 0?
?split-by-page-break:?
?end if?
(Of course with in tags)
in G_LINES loop.
Can anybody help me out :-(
--Saritha

Issue with PTO (Paid Time Off) quota generation

Hi All,
We have an issue with quota generation of PTO for our employees.
The issue goes like this:
We have a Paid time off for employees 5weeks( 200 hrs) for employees who have worked less than 5 years.
we have paid time off for employees 6 weeks ( 240 hrs) for employees who have worked more than 5 years.
we have the following logic that has to go in this config:
-- Our fiscal year starts on Feb 1st and ends on Jan end or Feb starts which has a full week of working days. ( ex: if 01/31/2012 falls on a Thursday the following Monday which has full 5 day working week would be the end of the fiscal year).
-- Depending on the working hours of the employees and the date of joining for the first year ( for new hires)0041 info type the eligibility gets varied and reduced. Ex( employees who joins on start of fiscal year and works 40hrs per week schedules is eligible for 200hrs of PTO. Employees who join in the month of august and works for 35 hrs per week ( i.e mid of fiscal year) would get 91 hrs of PTO.
I need to put this in the system. I am thinking this could be done with out tweaking PCR.I need help in configuring this in Absence quotas as to what are the things i need change in system config and how do i do it. Please help with some screen shots if possible. I really need this to get it done ASAP. Looking forward for help.
Thanks,
Chowdary.

We use TM00 schema. Can i call TS15 and TS 12 rules into TM00 acheieve my issue of quota entilements?
Iam doing this because my businees needs to see if an employee chages his work schedule from 40 to 30 or 20 etc.. the PTO has to vary accordingly.
As the minimum eligibility is to work for 20 hrs to avail the PTO days. If at any point the employee drops it under 20 he will not be eligible till he work any this >= 20hrs per month so the evaluation has to check periodically to update the quota availability.... I need help plz suggest ...

Issue with extractor 0BBP_TD_SC_1

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for