Item Validation Resulted in Error(s)

Hi,
We getting this message ' Item Validation Resulted in Error(s)' while doing the following.
- Changed the ship to address at the header level for the booked order
- Oracle is asking whether to cascade the changes to the line level
- On selection yes to cascade the changes to the line level we are getting
this error message' Item Validation Resulted in Error(s)'
Do you have any idea about the fix for this problem.
Note - Currently we are using a workaround for this.
Step 1) deselecting and the Item identifier type and Ordered item on the MAIN order line tab --> Saving the changes
Step 2) Changing the Ship to address to the new desired value on the ADDRESSES tab.
Thanks
Sunil

Hi - I am getting something similar when attempting to add a line to certain order via the Process Order API. The source for this new line is copied from a previous order but when I try to copy to the new order I get the same error. In order to get around the problem, I do not copt the original ORDERED_ITEM and ITEM_IDENTIFIER_TYPE (which was 'CUST'). When doing this, the order line copies to the new order successfully but shows the item's SEGMENT1 value rather than the ORDERED_ITEM from the source order. Any pointers would be much appreciated
Steve

Similar Messages

PLEASE HELP!!! Item Validation Resulted in error(s).

We get following error when using Oracle process_order API to create an Order.
Where should I check from? All the items seem valid.
There were errors in Oracle API
Item Validation Resulted in error(s).
Cannot get valid name for - Item_Relationship_Type

Pl see if ML Doc 417696.1 will help
Srini

Configuration validation resulted in error(s)

Hi,
I am facing a problem in configurator,we are using deferred booking workflow.When we are creating new orders with ATO/PTO items the standard BOOK Node in the workflow is getting completed with result Incomplete.
The error message on sales order, which we can see from View all open messages, is saying as"Configurator validation resulted in error(s)".
When we copy the above sales order which is failing with above error and create a new order, the new order is getting booked successfully.We are not changing anything in the copied order.
Also the deferred workflow is not giving any issues when creating a sales order using the Standard item.The OM debug is also not suggesting anything related to this.
Please let me know if anyone have come across this issue.
Thanks!

Thanks Sandeep for ur reply on this..
I followed the process u mentioned but it didnt work.Actually as I mentioned in my first question, this issue is coming up only when we are creating new sales order.If we copy the sales order which is not getting booked then the new one(copied) sales order's gets booked correctly.Though the copied sales order also have same configuration.
I also tried to validate the Configuration for the sales order having issue using the api CZ_CONFIG_API_PUB.verify_configuration and this resulting as SUCCESS.
Is there any thing in the deferred booking process which may cause this issue?
Also the error message Configuration Validation resulted in errors is coming through a exception, and the exception is being used in CZ_BATCH_VALIDATE.The batch validate is being called from Send_Input_xml procedure.It seems if we copy the order this procedure for batch validate is not being called.
but i m not getting any clue in Send_Input_xml procedure abt why exception is being raised.
Thanks!

When I book the PTO or ATO model, I am getting the error "Configuration validation resulted in error(s)."

Deal All,
When I try to BOOK the PTO or ATO model, I am getting this error "Configuration validation resulted in error(s).". System is not allowing me to BOOK the order.
Really appreciate if anyone faced this type of issue and please provide some solution on this.
Regards
Subramanyam Jayaram
Mobile : +91-888 680 1966

Please review the following docs and see if any helps.
Configuration Validation Resulted In Error(s) While Booking after Upgrade to R12 (Doc ID 1679380.1)
Configuration validation resulted in error(s); ORA-01403: no data found in Package oe_config_pvt (Doc ID 384266.1)
11.5.10.25.37 or lower - When Booking, Configuration Validation Resulted In Error(s) (Doc ID 727949.1)
"CONFIGURATION VALIDATION RESULTED IN ERROR(S)" WHEN BOOKING THE ORDER (Doc ID 1065818.1)
Configuration Validation Resulted In Error(s) While Booking (Doc ID 358164.1)
OEXOEORD: Booking Errors. Configuration Validation Resulted In Error(S). (Doc ID 311606.1)
Thanks,
Hussein

Using LOV with Validation on the Numeric Fields results in Error

Dear JHeadstart Team,
During my work with lov I encountered another problem. I defined a lov and attached the lov to a numeric field and check the LOV for validation. Now when I use LOV using the LOV button it works fine but when I enter some numbers and then press tab the LOV was not shown correctly and resulted in the following errors and the worst thing is that you can not navigate to any other pages and all try to navigate to other pages results in errors too. When we put the same LOV on a string field (which is not desirable for us) it worked fine.
It seems to me like a bug. Am I right? Is ther any solution or workaround for this problem?
Thanks in advance,
Navid
16:31:29 DEBUG (LovItemBean) -Cleared value of item HrTrainingCourseSchedulesTitle
16:31:29 DEBUG (LovItemBean) -Cleared value binding #{bindings.HrTrainingCourseSchedulesTitle.inputValue} of item HrTrainingCourseSchedulesTitle
16:31:29 ERROR (ApplyRequestValuesPhase) -java.lang.ClassCastException: java.lang.Long
javax.faces.el.EvaluationException: java.lang.ClassCastException: java.lang.Long
     at com.sun.faces.el.MethodBindingImpl.invoke(MethodBindingImpl.java:130)
     at oracle.adf.view.faces.component.UIXComponentBase.__broadcast(UIXComponentBase.java:1079)
     at oracle.adf.view.faces.component.UIXEditableValue.broadcast(UIXEditableValue.java:247)
     at oracle.adf.view.faces.component.UIXSelectInput.broadcast(UIXSelectInput.java:215)
     at javax.faces.component.UIViewRoot.broadcastEvents(UIViewRoot.java:249)
     at javax.faces.component.UIViewRoot.processDecodes(UIViewRoot.java:307)
     at com.sun.faces.lifecycle.ApplyRequestValuesPhase.execute(ApplyRequestValuesPhase.java:79)
     at com.sun.faces.lifecycle.LifecycleImpl.phase(LifecycleImpl.java:200)
     at com.sun.faces.lifecycle.LifecycleImpl.execute(LifecycleImpl.java:90)
     at javax.faces.webapp.FacesServlet.service(FacesServlet.java:197)
     at com.evermind.server.http.ResourceFilterChain.doFilter(ResourceFilterChain.java:64)
     at com.pooya.controller.jsf.PooyaAuthenticationFilter.doFilter(PooyaAuthenticationFilter.java:256)
     at com.evermind.server.http.EvermindFilterChain.doFilter(EvermindFilterChain.java:15)
     at oracle.adf.model.servlet.ADFBindingFilter.doFilter(ADFBindingFilter.java:332)
     at com.evermind.server.http.EvermindFilterChain.doFilter(EvermindFilterChain.java:17)
     at oracle.adfinternal.view.faces.webapp.AdfFacesFilterImpl._invokeDoFilter(AdfFacesFilterImpl.java:367)
     at oracle.adfinternal.view.faces.webapp.AdfFacesFilterImpl._doFilterImpl(AdfFacesFilterImpl.java:336)
     at oracle.adfinternal.view.faces.webapp.AdfFacesFilterImpl.doFilter(AdfFacesFilterImpl.java:196)
     at oracle.adf.view.faces.webapp.AdfFacesFilter.doFilter(AdfFacesFilter.java:87)
     at com.evermind.server.http.ServletRequestDispatcher.invoke(ServletRequestDispatcher.java:627)
     at com.evermind.server.http.ServletRequestDispatcher.forwardInternal(ServletRequestDispatcher.java:376)
     at com.evermind.server.http.HttpRequestHandler.doProcessRequest(HttpRequestHandler.java:870)
     at com.evermind.server.http.HttpRequestHandler.processRequest(HttpRequestHandler.java:451)
     at com.evermind.server.http.HttpRequestHandler.serveOneRequest(HttpRequestHandler.java:218)
     at com.evermind.server.http.HttpRequestHandler.run(HttpRequestHandler.java:119)
     at com.evermind.server.http.HttpRequestHandler.run(HttpRequestHandler.java:112)
     at oracle.oc4j.network.ServerSocketReadHandler$SafeRunnable.run(ServerSocketReadHandler.java:260)
     at oracle.oc4j.network.ServerSocketAcceptHandler.procClientSocket(ServerSocketAcceptHandler.java:230)
     at oracle.oc4j.network.ServerSocketAcceptHandler.access$800(ServerSocketAcceptHandler.java:33)
     at oracle.oc4j.network.ServerSocketAcceptHandler$AcceptHandlerHorse.run(ServerSocketAcceptHandler.java:831)
     at com.evermind.util.ReleasableResourcePooledExecutor$MyWorker.run(ReleasableResourcePooledExecutor.java:303)
     at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:595)
Caused by: java.lang.ClassCastException: java.lang.Long
     at oracle.jheadstart.controller.jsf.bean.LovItemBean.validateWithLov(LovItemBean.java:101)
     at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
     at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:39)
     at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:25)
     at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:585)
     at com.sun.faces.el.MethodBindingImpl.invoke(MethodBindingImpl.java:126)
     ... 31 more

Hi Navid,
We ran into the same bug and have the next workaround for it:
We extended the JHeadstart class 'LovItemBean' and we have overridden the method 'validateWithLov(...)' with:
public void validateWithLov(ValueChangeEvent valueChangeEvent)
    Object newValue = valueChangeEvent.getNewValue();
    if(newValue != null && !(newValue instanceof String))
      newValue = newValue.toString();
      ValueChangeEvent newEvent = new ValueChangeEvent(valueChangeEvent.getComponent(), valueChangeEvent.getOldValue(), newValue);
      newEvent.setPhaseId(valueChangeEvent.getPhaseId());
      super.validateWithLov(newEvent);
    else
      super.validateWithLov(valueChangeEvent);
}Next step is to use a custom template in your JHeaedstart Application Structure file for 'LOV_ITEM_BEAN'. In this custom template you should use your own class as 'managed-bean-class' instead of the default JHeadstart one.
Now you can safely generate LOV with validation of number fields.
Maybe something the JHeadstart can pcik up in the next release of JHeadstart :-)
Hope this helps.
Pascal

Item Validation on a Form - Receives ORA-0094: Invalid Idenitier error

I'm fairly new to APEX and having an issue with an Item Validation on a Form receiving the ORA-0094: <Column Name>: Invalid Identifier error. I have looked at postings in this form on this error and tried many of the suggestions. I still can not get it to work. My lack of experience with APEX is not helping either.
I'm using APEX release 2.2 with IE6.
I'm trying to create a new Invoice in the Invoice table (CTS_INVOICE). The RFA Number for this invoice must be an active RFA record in the RFA table (CTS_RFA). Before I add the check for the RFA active status, I wanted to get the code that checks for the existence of the RFA record working first.
After filling in the fields on the forms, click the Create button, and receives an error page with the following error ORA-0094: "RFA_NUMBER": Invalid Identifier.
I have checked to make sure the table name, column name, and item name were correct with spelling and capitalization.
Used the Wizard to setup the Item Validation.
Type: EXISTS
Validation Expression 1: Select 1 from CTS_RFA where RFA_Number = :P25_RFA_NUMBER
Error message: Enter an active RFA number.
location: Inline with Field and in Notification
Associated Item: P25_RFA_NUMBER
Any help would be greatly appreciated.
Thanks,
Vivian

Vivian - Might the column have been created as a quoted identifier with mixed upper/lower case characters?
Run this in SQL*Plus:
select count(rfa_number) from cts_rfa;
If that works without error then this is not the problem.
Scott

Failed Item Validation = Process Before Headers isn't run? (APEX 2.2.0)

Hi, all,
I have an item validation that fails. When the page reloads, I see the following in the debug output:
Do not run process "P41_BEFORE_HEADER", process point=BEFORE_HEADER, condition type=, when button pressed=If that process doesn't run, a flag I used to decide whether or not to display certain Page 0 regions never gets set properly, resulting in a mess.
Is there a way around this? The only thing that I can think of is to run the same code in a failed validation that gets run in my process. Is there a more elegant way?
Thanks!

I ended up finding Page rendering process doesn't run after validation error which basically says to make a PL/SQL region with an empty template and put any display-related PL/SQL there. I set the PL/SQL region's display point to "After Header", which is before any of my other regions.
I have a bunch of P0 regions that get conditionally displayed based on session state items set in the "Before Headers" process. All of the items are cleared by an application After Footer process. I don't want to rely on the session state, however, as the user might navigate using the browser buttons on a failed submit, and that might produce odd results. Unfortunately, I've realized that the application-wide processes don't get run either.
It seems that my option is just to create a PL/SQL function
FUNCTION SHOW_REGIONS
THIS_REGION BOOLEAN := FALSE
, THAT_REGION BOOLEAN := FALSE
, THE_OTHER_REGION BOOLEAN := FALSE
and call that function from my empty PL/SQL region, passing in true values for the regions that I want to show. Either this function would set application-level items, or other functions to get the individual flags could be called from each of the Page 0 region conditional display code. I think I will do the latter, unless there is some better way.
Thanks!
Message was edited by:
Don_84
CREATE OR REPLACE PACKAGE BODY
    TEST_PAGE_0_CONDITIONS
AS
    my_flag_one BOOLEAN := FALSE;
    my_flag_two BOOLEAN := FALSE;
    PROCEDURE SET_DISPLAY_FLAGS
            FLAG_ONE BOOLEAN := FALSE,
          , FLAG_TWO BOOLEAN := FALSE
    IS
    BEGIN
        my_flag_one := FLAG_ONE;
        my_flag_two := FLAG_TWO;
    END;
    FUNCTION GET_ONE
        RETURN BOOLEAN
    IS
    BEGIN
        RETURN my_flag_one;
    END;
    FUNCTION GET_TWO
        RETURN BOOLEAN
    IS
    BEGIN
        RETURN my_flag_two;
    END;
END;

Problem with Item Validation

Hello,
I am running an advanced tutorial: http://download.oracle.com/docs/cd/E14373_01/appdev.32/e13363/issue_track_ui.htm#BGBJCGIC
and I have a problem with item Validation.
Tutorial offers the following:
You must manually create another validation to ensure that the Actual End Date is the same or later then the Start Date.
To add a validation for the Actual End Date:
1.Under Page Processing, Validations, click the Create icon.
2.For Level, accept the default, Item level validation, and click Next.
3.For Item, select Project Details: 50.P3_ACTUAL_END_DATE (Actual End Date) and click Next.
4.For Validation Method:
a.Select PL/SQL and click Next.
b.Accept the default, PL/SQL Expression and click Next.
5.For Sequence and Name:
a.Sequence - Enter 50.
b.Validation Name - Enter P3_END_AFTER_START.
c.Accept the remaining defaults and click Next.
6.For Validation:
a.Validation - Enter:
to_date(:P3_ACTUAL_END_DATE,:APP_DATE_FORMAT) >= to_date
(:P3_START_DATE,:APP_DATE_FORMAT)
b.Error Message - Enter:
Actual End Date must be same or after Start Date.
c.Click Next.
7.For Conditions:
a.Condition Type - Select Value of Item in Expression 1 is NOT NULL
b.Expression 1 - Enter P3_ACTUAL_END_DATE
8.Click Create.
Is there a mistake in explanation? I did it 3 times already, very carefully! I ran the page, entered the date, which is After the Start date, and get the error message: Actual End Date must be same or After Start Date!!
Thank you for your consideration...

I got it solved. I don't know if this is documented(or a bug) but what I did was declare an exception and then raise it and put the form_trigger_failure into the exception handler rather than raise form_trigger_failure in the body.
declare
alreadyExists exception;
begin
-- select .....
raise alreadyExists;
exception
when alreadyExists then
message('.....exists');
raise form_trigger_failure
end;

DSC: Importing Shared Variables results in error -1950679010

This post is more of an "FYI" rather than a question. I am using LV DSC 8.2.
ASIDE: I ran into this problem because I was trying to solve a related problem with Deploy Library.vi (I had dependant libraries that deployed manually, but not programmatically). Eventually, I found the answer in http://digital.ni.com/public.nsf/allkb/8EF71E1DDDC36C908625716900594B50 (not a very satisfactory answer however, IMHO).
During my solution search, another hint was provided with http://forums.ni.com/ni/board/message?board.id=170&message.id=177268&requireLogin=False which hints that using a "Network" defined SV, as opposed to a "Project" defined SV, could help. Then I discovered the difference between NetworkrojectPath and Network:URL in the SV property definition. Then I realized that NetworkrojectBinding is exposed in the Import fields (using the Multiple Variable Editor to do the importing of course), and this gave me the idea of being able to define a Network SV using the Import function.
Unfortunately, it does not work. In the csv file I set NetworkrojectBinding to FALSE, Network:UseBinding to TRUE and provide a valid Network SV path, but this results in error -1950679010: "Shared variable is bound but path or URL is not specified", which occurs when trying to save the LVLIB. It would be nice to know why this doesn't work, as I think it should. I think it is a problem with the SV import mechanism.
David Moerman
TruView Technology Integration Ltd.

Yes, you can do this programatically. I've attached a small chunk of example code (LV 8.5) that creates just 1 variable, as well as an image of it in case you are using an earlier version of LV. If you want to create multiple variables for the same library just put the "AddSharedVariableToLibrary" in a loop, of course.
David Moerman
Attachments:
Create Library and SV.PNG ‏48 KB
Create Library of SVs - BASIC.vi ‏24 KB

Page copy seems to mess up item validation referenced fields in new page

Hello team,
this morning i create two pages as a copy of an existing page in Apex 4.0.1.
This page contained 4 regions, each one containing 4 items, sort of:
reg1
P44_ITEM_A1
P44_ITEM_B1
P44_ITEM_C1
P44_ITEM_D1
reg2
P44_ITEM_A2
reg4
P44_ITEM_D4
There were field item validations defined on each pair of items P44_ITEMCn - P44_ITEMDn and each validation was associated with its corresponding field (the element attribute linking the validation with the error message visualization i mean).
After creating the new page, i saw that some of these validations in the new page had lost their associated item attribute value or they were associated to the item with the highest item sequence, for instance P44_ITEM_A1 lost its associated item, while P44_ITEM_D1 was associated to P44_ITEM_D4.
I just did this again a few seconds ago, so i am pretty sure this is a repeatable error.
Flavio
http://oraclequirks.blogspot.com
http://www.yocoya.com

Hi Flavio,
I was able to reproduce this, of sorts. I created 2 regions each containing 4 page items, named in the way you describe. Then created item validations on all of those page items. Copied the page and the copied page contains some validations with a null 'Associated Item' value. Although, none were changed to a different item as you describe, in my test case.
I have filed bug #10198224 for this issue.
Thanks for reporting.
Regards,
Anthony

OB28 line item validations

Hi Experts ,
Please help me for the following scnerio
My OB28 line item validation is as follows .
Prerequiste
BKPF-TCODE = 'FBVB' AND ( BSEG-KOART = 'S' ) AND (
BSEG-BSCHL = '40' OR BSEG-BSCHL = '50' )
check
BSEG-SAKNR = '' "
message
Error! SAKNR is initialised. Please delete this line and re-create again.
For the above scenario I need validation as follows .
<b>I am implementing validation to ensure when user performed posting of parked document (tcode FBVB, FBV0), the field SAKNR is not being initialised with any value when the line items contained posting key(BSCHL) 40/50.
]As I am unable to create a wrong document with the above scenario, I need a program to create such an entry (this entry should not hardcode the information) so I could test if the validation rightfully trigger and stopped such wrong entry from being created.</b>
may be I need to write user-exit for the above scenario , how I can validate SAKNR field with value and with out value ,
I debugged the program ZGGBR000 , and I inserted the field SAKNR with value , then the FI validation was triggered . but I want to implement the above bolded information.
Please help me as early as possible.
Thanks & Regards
Mohan

Hi Mohan,
First of all, I'm not sure if you can park a FI doc without a GL a/c (SAKNR) in a productive system? and therefore what's the use of this validation??
Anyways, you could change the values in the debugger (SAKNR = ' ') in program ZGGBR000 when you are trying to park a document. After changing values of the variables the validation should give you the correct error message.
Other way is to write a BDC program with SAKNR = ' ' but before reaching the validation the standard program will issue an error message...so I dont think this would be the correct approach.
Reward points if helpful.
Regards.

Apexlib page item validation not shown correctly

Good morning guys! I have a question concerning the Apexlib page item validations.
Basically I just want to validate page item values and have errors displayed in a notification region on the very same page on submit.
I set up the Apexlib, which works perfectly for reports. However, when it comes to the page item validations, I am always rerouted to the Oracle Error page.
Do you know why or have you experienced similar problems?
Here is a part of the debug code when the error page is initialized.
Processing point: ON_SUBMIT_BEFORE_COMPUTATION
0.03: ...Process "ApplyMRU": MULTI_ROW_UPDATE (ON_SUBMIT_BEFORE_COMPUTATION) #OWNER#:VT_TBL_TOTHOLZ:CNT_TOTHOLZ
0.04: Branch point: BEFORE_COMPUTATION
0.04: Computation point: AFTER_SUBMIT
0.04: Tabs: Perform Branching for Tab Requests
0.04: Branch point: BEFORE_VALIDATION
0.04: Perform validations:
0.04: Branch point: BEFORE_PROCESSING
0.04: Processing point: AFTER_SUBMIT
0.04: ...Process "ApexLib-Before Computation/Validation": PLSQL (AFTER_SUBMIT) BEGIN ApexLib_Lov.clearLovNullValues; ApexLib_Item.validateItems; ApexLib_TabForm.validateColumns; -- ApexLib_Error.showErrorStack; END;
0.06: Show ERROR page...
If you have an idea please be so kind as to let me know!
Many thanks,
Seb

Hi Peter!
Thanks for having a look!
I am using Apex 3.2 and Apexlib 1.6!
Like I said, the report validations are functioning properly! It's just the error message is not displayed on the same page in a notification field. Instead the user is redirected to the original Apex Error Page when the error is caught.
What validation do I want to carry out?
I tried to verify the input of a text box with $APEXLIB_MAX_VALUE=10$.
I thought it might be a minor problem, which I couldn't find. Already checked the installation of Apexlib twice. Seems to be alright.
Best regards,
Seb
PS: Have a splendid WE

Items in template contain errors, only correct items are transferred

Hi guys,
When we create SC with items from the old SC the message appears: "Items in template contain errors, only correct items are transferred". I checked SC, there are no error messages. I found that field SOURCE_REL_IND in the table BBP_PDIGP is initial. Can it be the reason of this error message?

Hello
I think the old items from the old SC will be validated, and therefore you got this error message.
I would suggest to uncheck the 'Validate Product Data' (In Additional
Functions in product catalog tab) for the external catalog in the
following path:
spro -> SAP IMG -> Enterprise Buyer -> Master Data ->
Define Catalogs. Select the catalog, and then 'Goto -> Details'
Hope this helps,
Daniel

'Check covered levels OKS' process results in error during QA checkup

Hi,
The following process in QA test, before submiting a service contract results in error.
'Check covered levels OKS' with the error message
"Atleast one covered line is required".
I'm not able to choose any product.
How to set the covered level as product in service contracts?
In the service contracts authoring window, under lines tab -->pricing/products-->
effectivity
line number
level- covered product. But the lov in name field doesn't list any value ?
what could be the possible reason for this?
Regards,
Nithya

Well, I think I can only give some limited info about these questions since I am only a contracts user, not a developer or administrator.
But here's a few things that might help.
1 & 2) I have always created contracts from scratch where I work. They can't seem to get OM to create contracts correctly (so I can't help with question 2). I don't use OM except for inqueries.
When you create such a contract, it should show up in the Install Base (IB) if you look up the IB record with the related Reference Number (which changed to Product Number in the IB when my company switched from 11.5.5 to 11.5.8). In my case it was the Contracts tab in 11.5.5 (Java interface) and the Contracts link in 11.5.8 (HTML interface).
3) From my experience, the Contract Number is the Sales Order Number in View Transactions if you had the AR Interface checked in the contract.
If you want to change from not having the AR Interface checked to having it checked, I think this works fine and the contract will bill the next time the Main Billing program is run after you make the change, as long as the Bill On Date (11.5.5) or Invoice Date (11.5.8) is set to the current date or earlier. An Invoice (INV line item with invoice # -99) will show up in the Billing History after the AR to Contracts Interface program is run. The actual invoice # will show up in this Billing History after the Invoicing programs are run.
In 11.5.5, if our contract started in the future, we not only had to make sure the Bill On Date was current or earlier, but also run the Main Billing program on that contract with a date equal to or later than the end date of the contract we wanted to bill before it would work. Do not do this on all your contracts at once if you have recurring billing on any of them. You must run it on the individual contracts, otherwise the recurring contracts will bill in full. This is supposedly fixed in 11.5.8, since you can use offsets of more than 31 days on the invoice date, but we haven't billed any yet, so I can't say for sure.
I had problems with billing when trying to change the ammounts in the line items after the billing program had already invoiced a contract in 11.5.5 and haven't tried this in 11.5.8 (it billed incorrect ammounts on the successive invoices).
Note that we have a highly customized version of Oracle Applications 11i, so your results may differ somewhat.

Can't hide validation results

After validating my document using the W3C Validator within Dreamweaver, I was unable to hide specific validation results. I would click "hide" and the error would still appear when I revalidate my code.
I then installed a validation extension (http://www.adobe.com/cfusion/exchange/index.cfm?event=extensionDetail&extid=2188524), which didn't work either. I removed this extension and now the option to "hide" validation results through the W3C validator is gone altogether.
Anyone else having this problem or have possible solutions?
Thanks!

Some things to try:
Hit F7 to hide the results panel.
Disable Extensions from Extension Manager.
Close DW. Restart computer. Launch DW
Delete corrupted Cache and/or Personal Configuration folder.
http://forums.adobe.com/thread/494811
Nancy O.

Item Validation Resulted in Error(s)

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for