JDeveloper 11g,when the release version finish

Hi JDev Team
I read in many threads the JDev 11g have many features and resolver some problems for users like Templates and others.
when the release version finish?
and why oracle not publish the plan for JDev and ADF Faces and ADF BC and SOA
Thanks oracle.

We don't commit to dates because of Sarbanes-Oxley Act - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sarbanes-Oxley_Act.
If all goes as planned you'll get your first taste of what's coming up in release 11 in a couple of weeks.
For the production version release dates I can only say that it is going to be in the next Financial Year.

Similar Messages

Unresolved external symbols when building release version of DLL

I have C code which I use to build a DLL project. I have used the same code to create this DLL project in several different solutions.
I am trying to build it in a new solution, and can build the debug version, but I receive a bunch of unresolved external errors when I try to build the release version.
I have painstakingly compared the project release properties with the debug properties, and with the release properties of the same project when I have included it in other solutions. I can't find the problem.
Here are a few of the errors:
1>OLDNAMES.lib(access.obj) : error LNK2001: unresolved external symbol _access
1>Cbase_filedir.obj : error LNK2001: unresolved external symbol __imp__strchr
1>Cusage.lib(CusageWebLog.obj) : error LNK2001: unresolved external symbol __imp__strchr
1>Cbase_filedir.obj : error LNK2001: unresolved external symbol __imp__fopen
Any Suggestions?
Mike

Hi Mike,
Thanks for posting in MSDN forum.
1.Please check project properties->Linker->Additional dependencies has the same libs in both debug and release version. Maybe the lib you added in bebug version but not working in release version.
2.Double check there is no code in something like that #ifdebug ... #endif
3.please use the same character set in your dll or the referenced lib. Both are unicode character set or multi-Bity.
4.Please use the same Runtime library in your dll or the referenced lib. Both are C\C++->code generation->runtime library ->/MD or /MT
Above are some general scenarios, hope this helps some.
Best regards,
Shu Hu
We are trying to better understand customer views on social support experience, so your participation in this interview project would be greatly appreciated if you have time. Thanks for helping make community forums a great place.
Click
HERE to participate the survey.

Deployment Rule Sets do not properly launch the latest available version from the JRE6 family when the jpi-version is specified by the RIA

Issue Summary
In Java 1.7 Update 71, Java 1.7 Update 72 and Java 1.8 Update 25 Deployment Rule Sets do not properly launch the latest available version from the JRE6 family when the jpi-version is specified by the RIA. We've noticed this with Oracle Forms and Reports 11g where we have forms that specify Java 1.6 Update 20. We used to be able to specify Java 1.6 Update 26 in our Ruleset, but now the only version a that works in our ruleset is Java 1.6 Update 20 which is the same version requested by the JPI-Version attribute of the jar. The long term solution would be to upgrade Oracle Forms and Reports, however this isn't currently in the cards.
RuleSet.xml Test
Ruleset.xml
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
<ruleset version="1.0+">
<rule>
   <id location="*.javatester.org" />
   <action permission="run" version="1.6*" />
</rule>
<ruleset version="1.0+">
<rule>
   <id location="*.internaldomain.name" />
   <action permission="run" version="1.6*" />
</rule>
</ruleset>
Test 1 (Control)
Installed Java Versions:
– 1.7 Update 51 b13 (both x86 and x64 however x86 is invoked)
– 1.6 Update 26 b03 (both x86 and x64 however x86 is invoked)
Deployment Ruleset works as expected for both URLs
Test 2
Installed Java Versions:
– 1.7 Update 72 (both x86 and x64 however x86 is invoked)
– 1.6 Update 26 b03 (both x86 and x64 however x86 is invoked)
The RuleSet works for JavaTester.org however on internaldomain.name we get the following error:
With the trace logging turned on, I suspected the version attribute supplied by the RIA. I was able to trick Java by adding the following to my system deployment.properties file:
deployment.javaws.jre.0.product=1.6.0_20
deployment.javaws.jre.0.path=C\:\\Program Files (x86)\\Java\\jre6\\bin\\javaw.exe
deployment.javaws.jre.0.enabled=true
Because the RIA requests 1.6.0_20 it matches 1.6* from the deployment ruleset sooner than 1.6.0_26. However, if 1.6.0_20 is not available 1.6.0_26 should match according to the Deployment Rule Set documentation:
http://docs.oracle.com/javase/7/docs/technotes/guides/jweb/security/deployment_rules.html
The version of the JRE that is used is determined by the following order of precedence:
1. The current version of the JRE is used if it is available and matches both the version attribute and the version requested by the RIA.
2. The latest available version of the JRE is used if it matches both the version attribute and the version requested by the RIA.
3. The current version of the JRE is used if it is available and matches the version attribute.
4. The latest available version of the JRE is used if it matches the version attribute.
If no version is available that meets the criteria, then the RIA is blocked, and a message is shown to the user. To provide a custom message, include the message element.
As a result:
If Java 1.6.0_20 is listed in the version requested by the RIA and 1.6.0_20 is listed in the deployment.properties file, #1 matches.
If Java 1.6.0_20 is listed in the version requested by the RIA, but 1.6.0_20 is NOT listed in the deployment.properties file the #1 SHOULD match, but doesn’t. It used to match up-to and including JRE 1.7 Update 51 however the ruleset appears to no longer match in subsequent versions.
#2 should never match with our current Deployment Ruleset. It would match if we specified 1.7* as a version in the Ruleset.xml.
#3 used to be broken as well after JRE 1.7 Update 51 however this bug has been marked as fixed. See: http://bugs.java.com/view_bug.do?bug_id=8032781
I have reproduced this issue with Java 1.7 Update 71, Java 1.7 Update 72, and Java 1.8 Update 25 when one of these versions are installed with Java 1.6 Update 26.

I can't seem to edit this post anymore, for some odd reason.
So here goes;
I found this post in NVIDIA's knowledge base;
When installing an after-market graphics card into a certified Windows 8 PC with UEFI enabled, the s...
The interesting parts in this post are as follows;
When an after-market graphics card is installed into a motherboard with UEFI enabled in the system BIOS, or if the system is a certified Windows 8 PC with Secure Boot enabled, the system may not boot.
UEFI is a new system BIOS feature that is provided on most new motherboards. A UEFI system BIOS is required in order for the Windows 8 Secure Boot feature to work. Secure boot is enabled by default on certified Windows 8 PCs.
In order to get the PC to boot with a graphics card that does not contain UEFI firmware, the end-user must first disable the secure boot feature in the system's SBIOS before installing the graphics card.
Note: Some system SBIOS's incorporate a feature called compatibility boot. These systems will detect a non-UEFI-enabled firmware VBIOS and allow the user to disable secure boot and then proceed with a compatibility boot. If the system contains a system SBIOS the supports compatibility boot, the user will need to disable secure boot when asked during boot process
This leads me to believe that the BIOS update that wrecked my setup was 9SKT58A/9SJT58A, which only contains one change;
"Adds support for updating BIOS from a WIN7 BIOS to a WIN8 BIOS".
I've just ordered a cheap UEFI-compatible GT640 from Gainward, so I hope I'll be able to try that out this weekend.

What's going to happen to all the iWeb hacks when the next version comes?

When I refer to iWeb hacks in the title, I'm thinking of non-Apple software like "iWebsites" and "iWebenhancer".
From reading this forum, I've already learned how to have multiple websites on iWeb by duplicating and copying the domain file to different folders in my computer, where I work on different websites separately.
Now, I am thinking of getting "iWebenhancer" because I want to paste in some things, like "google adsense" and "youtube"/"Revver" video clips into my sites. HOWEVER, I am worried that all my hard work on my iWeb sites is going to get thrown out-of-wack when the next version of iWeb comes out early next year with iLife 2007 (I am presuming it will be released).
What do other forum users think? I know it can be only speculation now, but still I'm curious to know if anyone else is pondering this.

All of what you are saying is certainly possible. The next version of iWeb could potentially make all the workarounds that we do to edit HTML obsolete. To be sure, this is a net positive. But for those of us with more complex and more "post-processing" heavy sites, it will probably mean that we need to make some changes.
From a purely speculative viewpoint, I'm going to guess that the next version of iWeb will make adding external HTML snippets via post-publishing unnecessary. This would probably mean that we will be able to put whatever code we want to add right into the iWeb workspace....maybe somewhat akin to how iWebEnhancer works....but all built into iWeb. So as far as retooling our websites, this would simply require a one-time "put all your external code into iWeb and make sure it works" overhaul.
And I'm going to further speculate that the next version of iWeb may present us with many more desireable features....some that may make us want to abandon the way we do things now and possibly also abandon the very things that we strive to add to our sites today.... I'm thinking about more dynamic content with more user-interactivity. My point here is only that we might not mind the chance to overhaul our sites too much once we see the new features available to us.
Maybe I'm hoping for too much, though. I don't know. Your guess is as good as mine.

Application Insights is not recording any data from the released version of my Windows Phone app

I released my first Windows Phone app a week ago, and Application Insights worked perfectly to collect usage data whilst in a debug build. However, the released version of the app is not returning any data at all. Is this a common problem for new apps or
is there a problem that I need to address?
I configured Application Insights for my app using the information on this guide - http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/dn509554.aspx
Any ideas or help would be greatly appreciated, thanks for your help.

Hi Bernard, thanks for your reply.
I tested the data using a release package of the Windows Phone app deployed directly to my phone from Visual Studio and the data appeared after around 10 minutes. However, once I published the exact same package to the Windows Phone Store and started using
the version downloaded from the store, no usage data has been uploaded even after several days of waiting.
I am using SDK 0.7.1 and Application Insights Tools for Visual Studio v1.3.2. The app is built for WP 8.0 and running on WP 8.1.
The instrumentation key is 757eeaff-605e-44a2-8eaa-6abf498bfcf5.
Thanks for your time and help, I really appreciate it.
Dan

My iTunes Match automatically charged me for a second year when the first year finished. In spite of that, I have lost all of my playlists on my iPhone. How can I get them back?

My iTunes Match automatically charged me for a second year when the first year finished. In spite of that, I have lost all of my playlists on my iPhone. How can I get them back?

Hi,
No need to post three times!
Is iTunes Match still turned on on your iPhone? If not, you need to turn it back on.
If it is still on, go to settings, music app and turn off match- sign out of iTunes Store. Reboot iPhone, sign back into iTunes and turn on match. Poem music app. Does this help?
jim

Why do I get a "can't import spreadsheet because it was created with an unsupported application version" alert when the updated version was purchased direct from the Mac App Store? The spreadsheet is now lost somewhere!

Why do I get a "can't import spreadsheet because it was created with an unsupported application version" alert when the updated version was purchased direct from the Mac App Store? The spreadsheet is now lost somewhere!

Pages 4.3 should still be in an iWorks folder within your Applications folder.
http://www.apple.com/feedback/pages.html

Can iTunes be set to play only one song and then stop when the song is finished and not go on to play another unless commanded?

Can iTunes be set to play only one song and then stop when the song is finished and not go on to play another unless commanded?

If you uncheck all of the songs, they will only play if explicitly commanded. Command-click in a checkbox and they will all be unchecked. Command-clicking again will check the all again should you want to do that.

When the next version of Symbian Belle will be r...

Plz will you tell me when the next version of Symbian Belle will be ready for updatibg Nokia E7? & the other smart phones,,,,,?
do you think this year 2011 or next year will be ready for update?
regards to all

Don´t know....but here is a review of Belle from GSM Arena today:
Symbian Belle
Nokia 808 again (delight Belle), Nokia E7 and X7 ( again, all on Delight Belle...after some time on Nokia Lumia 925 (retired), 1020 (not that great)and Lumia 820 (Replaced my router at home, great for internet sharing).., N9 The best device ever (use it as much as Lumia 1020), Nokia 700 (Sport Phone/My Love :-) ) Nokia 701, Nokia E6 (Should have a follow-up from Nokia among with larger screen, NFC, Autofocus), Lumia 800 (Retired After 6 weeks), -Sports Tracker-Nokia Internet Radio-Handy Safe-Skype-Bambuser-Screenshot app pro-fMobi-ComingNext-Manual TaskSwitcher-jagiTimer-Easy StopWatch-Boldbeast-Equalizer-Financial Calculator-WiMP Music-YTasks-Davi-Thumbnail Folders-BizCalendar-Tiny7-Situations-nn reeder-Sport Timer-CameraLover-CameraPro-GrabRadio-LiveScore-Poddi-Gravity-SkyFilesPro

When the new version will correct the error 10.0.0? program constantly hangs. will not start!

when the new version will correct the error 10.0.0? program constantly hangs. will not start!

Are you using any VST plug-ins or audio units? Then check, if they are still compatible. You may need to uninstall them.
See this support document:
Unexpected behavior with Audio Unit plug-ins http://support.apple.com/kb/TS5249

Approval Preview when the workflow is finished

Hello,
We have implemented the BADI to get multiple level approvals in Shopping Carts. When we display the approvers via Approval Preview the system works fine if the workflow is in process, but when the workflow is finished we donu2019t display anything.
We have SRM 4.00 and the support package SAPKIBKS13 for SRM_SERVER 500
Thanks in advance, Juan Manuel

Hi,
Please check for following excrepts from SAP help sites:
1. OSS Note 1093840, content here may help to debug.
2. You are using ad hoc agent objects to determine your agents, do not use rules directly as this limits the functionality
    available especially during approval preview and can have knock on effects in the display
3. Mark any steps you have added that are not approval steps as "step not     in workflow log" - the applet display is based on
   the graphical workflow log and unexpected steps can cause unexpected effects in the applet display
4. Make sure you follow the same pattern based approach if you are adding extra approval steps, e.g. make sure the approval
    step itself has the same group name as the other approval steps
Also additionaly check for workflow log(SWi6) . If WF is working fine.
Thanks

Moving from FlexBuilder Beta 3 to the Release Version

Hi All,
I have installed the release version of FlexBuilder 2.0 and
the app that I was testing in Beta 3 gives all kind of errors:
ex:
headerHeight = measureHeaderText().height + HEADER_PADDING;
gives te error: 1120: Access of undefined property
HEADER_PADDING.
<mx:Model id="registeredUser">
<firstname>{this.firstname.text}</firstname>
<email>{this.email.text}</email>
<password>{this.password.text}</password>
<confirmPassword>{this.confirmPassword.text}</confirmPassword>
</mx:Model>
gives: Only one root tag is allowed.
The same code works fine in Beta 3
Thanks

hi
i think u just read migration to get solution
u can find this doc in
flex.org site
bye

Does anyone have an idea when the new version of apple tv is coming out?

does anyone have an idea when the new version of apple tv is coming out? I want to buy apple tv, but would prefer to wait if it is expected to come out in the next month or so.

No, as this is a user forum and speculation is not permitted.

HT5957 Update beta version iOS7 to the release version

I need to update my beta version iOS7 to the release version, does anyone have the correct procedure?

Hi macsnt, and a warm welcome to the forums!
The latest you can update yours is to 10.5.x, which is 10.5.8 ay the moment.
Leopard requirements/10.5.x...
* Mac computer with an Intel, PowerPC G5, or PowerPC G4 (867MHz or faster) processor
minimum system requirements
* 512MB of memory (I say 2GB at least)
* DVD drive for installation
* 9GB of available disk space (I say 30GB at least)
You have to call Apple & likely ask for a Product Specialist to get it, if they still have it!
Snow Leopard/10.6.x is out of the question...
Snow Leopard/10.6.x Requirements...
General requirements
* Mac computer with an *Intel processor*
* 1GB of memory (I say 2GB at least)
* 5GB of available disk space (I say 30GB at least)
* DVD drive for installation
* Some features require a compatible Internet service provider; fees may apply.
* Some features require Apple’s MobileMe service; fees and terms apply.

I installed Firefox 4 beta, now that Firefox 4 is released, do I have to download the release version or I can apply updates to make it a release version?

See my question

It will automatically install the release version, though you already appear to have updated to the release version.

JDeveloper 11g,when the release version finish

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for