JSP Performance Problem

Hi,
In my web application one of the JSP is taking a lot of time to execute/transmit/render. The JSP in question has 17 HTML list boxes. some of them of size around 2000 items. JSP is written using struts tags to generate HTML select.
I tried putting logger statement inside JSP around "<select> < optionsCollection>" to get time it takes for different list boxes to generate.
Below are the observations.
1) One particular element (HTML SELECT/ optionsCollection) in JSP takes around 20 seconds.
2) If I move same HTML select Box 1 or 2 rows up then it takes milliseconds to generate but now another list box takes around 20 seconds.
3) Problem is only on the Solaris server we are using for testing. JSP runs perfectly fine when I run on my windows desktop or any other desktop in our LAN.
Note : Application when deployed on server is accessed using HTTPS while in local environment it is accessed using HTTP
Can anyone help explain this behavior?

Similar Messages

JSP causes serious performance problem in my EP

I have a native JSP application and running it on the EP. This application accessing a Oracle db (using oracle.jdbc.driver.OracleDriver driver).
When this db not running, my EP doesn't open any page. The EP try to connect with this db, but not get success.
I modify this application with TRY and CATCH to treat the application problem, but the EP problem continues.
In the EP Thread Overview (System Adm -> Monitoring -> Portal -> Thread Overview), I see threads (locked) about this application. To unlock this threads, I delete the par file from the Portal and re-deploy it.
When this threads is deleted, the application treat the problem (display a error message in the iView container) and EP work normally.
My questions:
1) Exists some way that the problem with this application does not cause performance problems with the EP (via code or property)?
2) Exists some property in the Config Tool where I configure the connection timeout for access the external DB?
3) Exists some way to liberate these (locked) threads of the EP (I see the page Clearing the Portal Runtime Cache - http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw04/helpdata/en/d2/a216e1bd7b431c82fa5ff105187112/frameset.htm - but I don't know if I can use it for this)
I use EP 6.0 SP 15.
Thanks,
Yuri Fiori de Almeida

Hi Umair,
the code is:
<%@ page contentType="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1" language="java" import="java.sql.*" %>
<%@ include file="isa_cad.jsp" %>
<%
Connection Connselect_localidade = null;
try{
     Driver Driverselect_localidade = (Driver)Class.forName(MM_isa_cad_DRIVER).newInstance();
     Connselect_localidade = DriverManager.getConnection(MM_isa_cad_STRING,MM_isa_cad_USERNAME,MM_isa_cad_PASSWORD);
     PreparedStatement Statementselect_localidade = Connselect_localidade.prepareStatement("SELECT DISTINCT X AS Y FROM Z.K WHERE W = 1 ORDER BY X");
     ResultSet select_localidade = Statementselect_localidade.executeQuery();
     boolean select_localidade_isEmpty = !select_localidade.next();
     boolean select_localidade_hasData = !select_localidade_isEmpty;
     Object select_localidade_data;
     int select_localidade_numRows = 0;
%>

<%
          select_localidade_hasData = select_localidade.next();
     select_localidade.close();
     Statementselect_localidade.close();
//Connselect_localidade.close();
%>

<%
catch(Exception e){
%>
<%
finally{
     try{
          if(Connselect_localidade != null) Connselect_localidade.close();
     catch(Exception e){
%>
Thanks,
Yuri.

JRC 2: Performance Problem

Hi.
Our reporting component used JRC 1.x before we upgraded to JRC 2.x. We got two issues after upgrading.
First issue I solved already with a workaround which I published on stackoverflow.com. (1) Does anyone knows where I will find the issue management system to report this issue?
Second issue occurs big performance problem within our project. We opened a report with 6 subreports (which includes 1 upto 3 tables) in 2-4 seconds using JRC 1. If we will open same report using JRC 2, we wait upto 60 seconds.
This methods requires more time with JRC 2 comparing to JRC 1:
ReportClientDocument#open(String, int);
SubreportController#setTableLocation(String, ITable, ITable)
DatabaseController#setTableLocation(ITable, ITable)
Each invocation of one of these methods requires 2-4 seconds.
Thank you in advance.
Best regards
Thomas
(1) http://stackoverflow.com/questions/479405/replace-a-database-connection-for-subreports-with-jrc

hello ....
my report is ''crystal report 11'' => "OLE DB" => "Add Command(select * from table) " .
code(JRC) : eclipse + crystal report for eclipse version 2 => "cr4e-all-in-one-win_2.0.1.zip"
<%@ page contentType="text/html; charset=UTF-8"
import="
com.crystaldecisions.report.web.viewer.CrystalReportViewer,
com.crystaldecisions.reports.sdk.ReportClientDocument,
com.crystaldecisions.sdk.occa.report.lib.ReportSDKExceptionBase,
java.sql.Connection,
java.sql.DriverManager,
java.sql.ResultSet,
java.sql.SQLException,
java.sql.Statement" %>
<%
     try {
          String reportName = "report.rpt";
          ReportClientDocument clientDoc = new ReportClientDocument();
          clientDoc.open(reportName, 0);
          String tableAlias = "Command";
          clientDoc.getDatabaseController().setDataSource(myResult("SELECT * FROM table"), tableAlias,tableAlias);
          CrystalReportViewer crystalReportPageViewer = new CrystalReportViewer();
          crystalReportPageViewer.setReportSource(clientDoc.getReportSource());
          crystalReportPageViewer.processHttpRequest(request, response, application, null);
     } catch (ReportSDKExceptionBase e) {
          e.printStackTrace();
         out.println(e);
%>
I simplified the code, *myResult("SELECT * FROM table") * is absolutely no problem ,
and this code is absolutely no problem in the "crystal report for eclipse "version 1
but in version 2 run error:
com.crystaldecisions.sdk.occa.report.lib.ReportSDKException: u7121u6CD5u9810u671Fu7684u8CC7u6599u5EABu9023u7DDAu5668u932Fu8AA4---- Error code:-2147467259 Error code name:failed
     at com.businessobjects.reports.sdk.JRCCommunicationAdapter.a(Unknown Source)
     at com.businessobjects.reports.sdk.JRCCommunicationAdapter.a(Unknown Source)
     at com.businessobjects.reports.sdk.JRCCommunicationAdapter.if(Unknown Source)
     at com.businessobjects.reports.sdk.JRCCommunicationAdapter.a(Unknown Source)
     at com.businessobjects.reports.sdk.JRCCommunicationAdapter$2.a(Unknown Source)
     at com.businessobjects.reports.sdk.JRCCommunicationAdapter$2.call(Unknown Source)
     at com.crystaldecisions.reports.common.ThreadGuard.syncExecute(Unknown Source)
     at com.businessobjects.reports.sdk.JRCCommunicationAdapter.for(Unknown Source)
     at com.businessobjects.reports.sdk.JRCCommunicationAdapter.int(Unknown Source)
     at com.businessobjects.reports.sdk.JRCCommunicationAdapter.request(Unknown Source)
     at com.businessobjects.sdk.erom.jrc.a.a(Unknown Source)
     at com.businessobjects.sdk.erom.jrc.a.execute(Unknown Source)
     at com.crystaldecisions.proxy.remoteagent.RemoteAgent$a.execute(Unknown Source)
     at com.crystaldecisions.proxy.remoteagent.CommunicationChannel.a(Unknown Source)
     at com.crystaldecisions.proxy.remoteagent.RemoteAgent.a(Unknown Source)
     at com.crystaldecisions.sdk.occa.report.application.ReportClientDocument.if(Unknown Source)
     at com.crystaldecisions.sdk.occa.report.application.ReportClientDocument.a(Unknown Source)
     at com.crystaldecisions.sdk.occa.report.application.ReportClientDocument.new(Unknown Source)
     at com.crystaldecisions.sdk.occa.report.application.b9.onDataSourceChanged(Unknown Source)
     at com.crystaldecisions.sdk.occa.report.application.DatabaseController.a(Unknown Source)
     at com.crystaldecisions.sdk.occa.report.application.DatabaseController.a(Unknown Source)
     at com.crystaldecisions.sdk.occa.report.application.DatabaseController.setDataSource(Unknown Source)
     at org.apache.jsp.No_005f1.Eclipse_005fJTDS_005fSQL2005_005fTable_002dviewer_jsp._jspService(Eclipse_005fJTDS_005fSQL2005_005fTable_002dviewer_jsp.java:106)
     at org.apache.jasper.runtime.HttpJspBase.service(HttpJspBase.java:70)
     at javax.servlet.http.HttpServlet.service(HttpServlet.java:717)
     at org.apache.jasper.servlet.JspServletWrapper.service(JspServletWrapper.java:374)
     at org.apache.jasper.servlet.JspServlet.serviceJspFile(JspServlet.java:342)
     at org.apache.jasper.servlet.JspServlet.service(JspServlet.java:267)
     at javax.servlet.http.HttpServlet.service(HttpServlet.java:717)
     at org.apache.catalina.core.ApplicationFilterChain.internalDoFilter(ApplicationFilterChain.java:290)
     at org.apache.catalina.core.ApplicationFilterChain.doFilter(ApplicationFilterChain.java:206)
     at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardWrapperValve.invoke(StandardWrapperValve.java:233)
     at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardContextValve.invoke(StandardContextValve.java:191)
     at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardHostValve.invoke(StandardHostValve.java:128)
     at org.apache.catalina.valves.ErrorReportValve.invoke(ErrorReportValve.java:102)
     at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardEngineValve.invoke(StandardEngineValve.java:109)
     at org.apache.catalina.connector.CoyoteAdapter.service(CoyoteAdapter.java:286)
     at org.apache.coyote.http11.Http11Processor.process(Http11Processor.java:845)
     at org.apache.coyote.http11.Http11Protocol$Http11ConnectionHandler.process(Http11Protocol.java:583)
     at org.apache.tomcat.util.net.JIoEndpoint$Worker.run(JIoEndpoint.java:447)
     at java.lang.Thread.run(Unknown Source)
Caused by: com.crystaldecisions.reports.common.QueryEngineException: u7121u6CD5u9810u671Fu7684u8CC7u6599u5EABu9023u7DDAu5668u932Fu8AA4
     at com.crystaldecisions.reports.queryengine.Connection.bf(Unknown Source)
     at com.crystaldecisions.reports.queryengine.Rowset.z3(Unknown Source)
     at com.crystaldecisions.reports.queryengine.Rowset.bL(Unknown Source)
     at com.crystaldecisions.reports.queryengine.Rowset.zM(Unknown Source)
     at com.crystaldecisions.reports.queryengine.Connection.a(Unknown Source)
     at com.crystaldecisions.reports.queryengine.Table.a(Unknown Source)
     at com.crystaldecisions.reports.queryengine.Table.if(Unknown Source)
     at com.crystaldecisions.reports.queryengine.Table.try(Unknown Source)
     at com.crystaldecisions.reports.queryengine.Table.a(Unknown Source)
     at com.crystaldecisions.reports.queryengine.Table.u7(Unknown Source)
     at com.crystaldecisions.reports.datafoundation.DataFoundation.a(Unknown Source)
     at com.crystaldecisions.reports.dataengine.dfadapter.DFAdapter.a(Unknown Source)
     at com.crystaldecisions.reports.dataengine.dfadapter.CheckDatabaseHelper.a(Unknown Source)
     at com.crystaldecisions.reports.dataengine.datafoundation.CheckDatabaseCommand.new(Unknown Source)
     at com.crystaldecisions.reports.common.CommandManager.a(Unknown Source)
     at com.crystaldecisions.reports.common.Document.a(Unknown Source)
     at com.crystaldecisions.reports.dataengine.VerifyDatabaseCommand.new(Unknown Source)
     at com.crystaldecisions.reports.common.CommandManager.a(Unknown Source)
     at com.crystaldecisions.reports.common.Document.a(Unknown Source)
     at com.businessobjects.reports.sdk.requesthandler.f.a(Unknown Source)
     at com.businessobjects.reports.sdk.requesthandler.DatabaseRequestHandler.a(Unknown Source)
     at com.businessobjects.reports.sdk.requesthandler.DatabaseRequestHandler.if(Unknown Source)
     at com.businessobjects.reports.sdk.JRCCommunicationAdapter.do(Unknown Source)
     ... 39 more
Please help me and tell me why....

Performance Problems on Faces Navigation Diagram and Hyperthreading query

Am I the only one having performance problems when dealing with Faces-Config Diagrams of about 35 JSPs displayed on the sheet. using Jdev 10.1.3 It's taking my workstation about a full minute and a half to update the name of an arrow. The most stressed component during this task seems to be the CPU.
And just another question has anybody investigated how is the performance of Jdev affected by either enabling or disabling hyperthreading? In my case my CPU usage manages to reach only 50%. I'm tempted to switch HT off to let JDev use all the cpu power. if that would be the case.

Hello Diego,
you mentioned that you compared a BEx Query with the Web INtelligence report. Could you provide more details here ?
- what are the elements in the rows, columns and free characterisitcs in the BEx Query ?
- was the query execute as designed in the BEx Query Designer with BEx Web Reporting ?
- what are the elements in the WebIntelligence Query panel ?
thanks
Ingo

Performance problem when running a personalization rule

We have a serious performance problem when running a personalization rule.
The rule is defined like this:
Definition
Rule Type: Content
Content Type: LoadedData
Name: allAnnouncements
Description: all announcements of types: announcement, deal, new release,
tip of the day
If the user has the following characteristics:
And when:
Then display content based on:
(CONTENT.RessourceType == announcement) or (CONTENT.RessourceType == deal)
or (CONTENT.RessourceType == new release) or (CONTENT.RessourceType == tip
of the week)
and CONTENT.endDate > now
and CONTENT.startDate <= now
END---------------------------------
and is invoked in a JSP page like this:
<%String customQuery = "(CONTENT.language='en') && (CONTENT.Country='nl'
|| CONTENT.Country='*' ) && (!(CONTENT.excludeIds like '*#7#*')) &&
(CONTENT.userType ='retailer')"%>
<pz:contentselector
id="cdocs"
ruleSet="jdbc://com.beasys.commerce.axiom.reasoning.rules.RuleSheetDefinitio
nHome/b2boost"
rule="allAnnouncements"
sortBy="startDate DESC"
query="<%=customQuery%>"
contentHome="<%=ContentHelper.DEF_DOCUMENT_MANAGER_HOME%>" />
The customQuery is constructed at runtime from user information, and cannot
be constructed with rules
administration interface.
When I turn on debugging mode, I can see that the rule is parsed and a SQL
query is generated, with the correct parameters.
This is the generated query (with the substitutions):
select
WLCS_DOCUMENT.ID,
WLCS_DOCUMENT.DOCUMENT_SIZE,
WLCS_DOCUMENT.VERSION,
WLCS_DOCUMENT.AUTHOR,
WLCS_DOCUMENT.CREATION_DATE,
WLCS_DOCUMENT.LOCKED_BY,
WLCS_DOCUMENT.MODIFIED_DATE,
WLCS_DOCUMENT.MODIFIED_BY,
WLCS_DOCUMENT.DESCRIPTION,
WLCS_DOCUMENT.COMMENTS,
WLCS_DOCUMENT.MIME_TYPE
FROM
WLCS_DOCUMENT
WHERE
((((WLCS_DOCUMENT.ID IN (
SELECT
WLCS_DOCUMENT_METADATA.ID
FROM
WLCS_DOCUMENT_METADATA
WHERE
WLCS_DOCUMENT_METADATA.ID = WLCS_DOCUMENT.ID
AND WLCS_DOCUMENT_METADATA.NAME = 'RessourceType'
AND WLCS_DOCUMENT_METADATA.VALUE = 'announcement'
)) OR (WLCS_DOCUMENT.ID IN (
SELECT
WLCS_DOCUMENT_METADATA.ID
FROM
WLCS_DOCUMENT_METADATA
WHERE
WLCS_DOCUMENT_METADATA.ID = WLCS_DOCUMENT.ID
AND WLCS_DOCUMENT_METADATA.NAME = 'RessourceType'
AND WLCS_DOCUMENT_METADATA.VALUE = 'deal'
)) OR (WLCS_DOCUMENT.ID IN (
SELECT
WLCS_DOCUMENT_METADATA.ID
FROM
WLCS_DOCUMENT_METADATA
WHERE
WLCS_DOCUMENT_METADATA.ID = WLCS_DOCUMENT.ID
AND WLCS_DOCUMENT_METADATA.NAME = 'RessourceType'
AND WLCS_DOCUMENT_METADATA.VALUE = 'new release'
)) OR (WLCS_DOCUMENT.ID IN (
SELECT
WLCS_DOCUMENT_METADATA.ID
FROM
WLCS_DOCUMENT_METADATA
WHERE
WLCS_DOCUMENT_METADATA.ID = WLCS_DOCUMENT.ID
AND WLCS_DOCUMENT_METADATA.NAME = ''
AND WLCS_DOCUMENT_METADATA.VALUE = 'tip of the week'
)) OR (WLCS_DOCUMENT.ID IN (
SELECT
WLCS_DOCUMENT_METADATA.ID
FROM
WLCS_DOCUMENT_METADATA
WHERE
WLCS_DOCUMENT_METADATA.ID = WLCS_DOCUMENT.ID
AND WLCS_DOCUMENT_METADATA.NAME = 'RessourceType'
AND WLCS_DOCUMENT_METADATA.VALUE = 'press release'
AND (WLCS_DOCUMENT.ID IN (
SELECT
WLCS_DOCUMENT_METADATA.ID
FROM
WLCS_DOCUMENT_METADATA
WHERE
WLCS_DOCUMENT_METADATA.ID = WLCS_DOCUMENT.ID
AND WLCS_DOCUMENT_METADATA.NAME = 'endDate'
AND WLCS_DOCUMENT_METADATA.VALUE > '2001-10-22 15:53:14.768'
AND (WLCS_DOCUMENT.ID IN (
SELECT
WLCS_DOCUMENT_METADATA.ID
FROM
WLCS_DOCUMENT_METADATA
WHERE
WLCS_DOCUMENT_METADATA.ID = WLCS_DOCUMENT.ID
AND WLCS_DOCUMENT_METADATA.NAME = 'startDate'
AND WLCS_DOCUMENT_METADATA.VALUE <= '2001-10-22 15:53:14.768'
AND ((WLCS_DOCUMENT.ID IN (
SELECT
WLCS_DOCUMENT_METADATA.ID
FROM
WLCS_DOCUMENT_METADATA
WHERE
WLCS_DOCUMENT_METADATA.ID = WLCS_DOCUMENT.ID
AND WLCS_DOCUMENT_METADATA.NAME = 'language'
AND WLCS_DOCUMENT_METADATA.VALUE = 'en'
AND ((WLCS_DOCUMENT.ID IN (
SELECT
WLCS_DOCUMENT_METADATA.ID
FROM
WLCS_DOCUMENT_METADATA
WHERE
WLCS_DOCUMENT_METADATA.ID = WLCS_DOCUMENT.ID
AND WLCS_DOCUMENT_METADATA.NAME = 'Country'
AND WLCS_DOCUMENT_METADATA.VALUE = 'nl'
)) OR (WLCS_DOCUMENT.ID IN (
SELECT
WLCS_DOCUMENT_METADATA.ID
FROM
WLCS_DOCUMENT_METADATA
WHERE
WLCS_DOCUMENT_METADATA.ID = WLCS_DOCUMENT.ID
AND WLCS_DOCUMENT_METADATA.NAME = 'Country'
AND WLCS_DOCUMENT_METADATA.VALUE = '*'
AND NOT (WLCS_DOCUMENT.ID IN (
SELECT
WLCS_DOCUMENT_METADATA.ID
FROM
WLCS_DOCUMENT_METADATA
WHERE
WLCS_DOCUMENT_METADATA.ID = WLCS_DOCUMENT.ID
AND WLCS_DOCUMENT_METADATA.NAME = 'excludeIds'
AND WLCS_DOCUMENT_METADATA.VALUE LIKE '%#7#%' ESCAPE '\'
AND (WLCS_DOCUMENT.ID IN (
SELECT
WLCS_DOCUMENT_METADATA.ID
FROM
WLCS_DOCUMENT_METADATA
WHERE
WLCS_DOCUMENT_METADATA.ID = WLCS_DOCUMENT.ID
AND WLCS_DOCUMENT_METADATA.NAME = 'userType'
AND WLCS_DOCUMENT_METADATA.VALUE = 'retailer'
At this moment, the server makes the user wait more than 10 min for the
query to execute.
This is what I found out about the problem:
1)When I run the query on an Oracle SQL client (We are using Oracle 8.1.7.0)
, it takes 5-10 seconds.
2)If I remove the second term of (CONTENT.Country='nl' ||
CONTENT.Country='*' ) in the custom query,
thus retricting to CONTENT.Country='nl', the performance is OK.
3)There are currently more or less 130 records in the DB that have
Country='*'
4)When I run the page on our QA server (solaris), which is at the same time
our Oracle server,
the response time is OK, but if I run it on our development server (W2K),
response time is ridiculously long.
5)The problem happens also if I add the term (CONTENT.Country='nl' ||
CONTENT.Country='*' )
to the rule definition, and I remove this part from the custom query.
Am I missing something? Am I using the personalization server correctly?
Is this performance difference between QA and DEV due to differences in the
OS?
Thank you,
Luis Muñiz

Luis,
I think you are working through Support on this one, so hopefully you are in good
shape.
For others who are seeing this same performance issue with the reference CM implementation,
there is a patch available via Support for the 3.2 and 3.5 releases that solves
this problem.
This issue is being tracked internally as CR060645 for WLPS 3.2 and CR055594 for
WLPS 3.5.
Regards,
PJL
"Luis Muniz" <[email protected]> wrote:
We have a serious performance problem when running a personalization
rule.
The rule is defined like this:
Definition
Rule Type: Content
Content Type: LoadedData
Name: allAnnouncements
Description: all announcements of types: announcement, deal, new release,
tip of the day
If the user has the following characteristics:
And when:
Then display content based on:
(CONTENT.RessourceType == announcement) or (CONTENT.RessourceType ==
deal)
or (CONTENT.RessourceType == new release) or (CONTENT.RessourceType ==
tip
of the week)
and CONTENT.endDate > now
and CONTENT.startDate <= now
END---------------------------------
and is invoked in a JSP page like this:
<%String customQuery = "(CONTENT.language='en') && (CONTENT.Country='nl'
|| CONTENT.Country='*' ) && (!(CONTENT.excludeIds like '*#7#*')) &&
(CONTENT.userType ='retailer')"%>
<pz:contentselector
id="cdocs"
ruleSet="jdbc://com.beasys.commerce.axiom.reasoning.rules.RuleSheetDefinitio
nHome/b2boost"
rule="allAnnouncements"
sortBy="startDate DESC"
query="<%=customQuery%>"
contentHome="<%=ContentHelper.DEF_DOCUMENT_MANAGER_HOME%>" />
The customQuery is constructed at runtime from user information, and
cannot
be constructed with rules
administration interface.
When I turn on debugging mode, I can see that the rule is parsed and
a SQL
query is generated, with the correct parameters.
This is the generated query (with the substitutions):
select
WLCS_DOCUMENT.ID,
WLCS_DOCUMENT.DOCUMENT_SIZE,
WLCS_DOCUMENT.VERSION,
WLCS_DOCUMENT.AUTHOR,
WLCS_DOCUMENT.CREATION_DATE,
WLCS_DOCUMENT.LOCKED_BY,
WLCS_DOCUMENT.MODIFIED_DATE,
WLCS_DOCUMENT.MODIFIED_BY,
WLCS_DOCUMENT.DESCRIPTION,
WLCS_DOCUMENT.COMMENTS,
WLCS_DOCUMENT.MIME_TYPE
FROM
WLCS_DOCUMENT
WHERE
((((WLCS_DOCUMENT.ID IN (
SELECT
WLCS_DOCUMENT_METADATA.ID
FROM
WLCS_DOCUMENT_METADATA
WHERE
WLCS_DOCUMENT_METADATA.ID = WLCS_DOCUMENT.ID
AND WLCS_DOCUMENT_METADATA.NAME = 'RessourceType'
AND WLCS_DOCUMENT_METADATA.VALUE = 'announcement'
)) OR (WLCS_DOCUMENT.ID IN (
SELECT
WLCS_DOCUMENT_METADATA.ID
FROM
WLCS_DOCUMENT_METADATA
WHERE
WLCS_DOCUMENT_METADATA.ID = WLCS_DOCUMENT.ID
AND WLCS_DOCUMENT_METADATA.NAME = 'RessourceType'
AND WLCS_DOCUMENT_METADATA.VALUE = 'deal'
)) OR (WLCS_DOCUMENT.ID IN (
SELECT
WLCS_DOCUMENT_METADATA.ID
FROM
WLCS_DOCUMENT_METADATA
WHERE
WLCS_DOCUMENT_METADATA.ID = WLCS_DOCUMENT.ID
AND WLCS_DOCUMENT_METADATA.NAME = 'RessourceType'
AND WLCS_DOCUMENT_METADATA.VALUE = 'new release'
)) OR (WLCS_DOCUMENT.ID IN (
SELECT
WLCS_DOCUMENT_METADATA.ID
FROM
WLCS_DOCUMENT_METADATA
WHERE
WLCS_DOCUMENT_METADATA.ID = WLCS_DOCUMENT.ID
AND WLCS_DOCUMENT_METADATA.NAME = ''
AND WLCS_DOCUMENT_METADATA.VALUE = 'tip of the week'
)) OR (WLCS_DOCUMENT.ID IN (
SELECT
WLCS_DOCUMENT_METADATA.ID
FROM
WLCS_DOCUMENT_METADATA
WHERE
WLCS_DOCUMENT_METADATA.ID = WLCS_DOCUMENT.ID
AND WLCS_DOCUMENT_METADATA.NAME = 'RessourceType'
AND WLCS_DOCUMENT_METADATA.VALUE = 'press release'
AND (WLCS_DOCUMENT.ID IN (
SELECT
WLCS_DOCUMENT_METADATA.ID
FROM
WLCS_DOCUMENT_METADATA
WHERE
WLCS_DOCUMENT_METADATA.ID = WLCS_DOCUMENT.ID
AND WLCS_DOCUMENT_METADATA.NAME = 'endDate'
AND WLCS_DOCUMENT_METADATA.VALUE > '2001-10-22 15:53:14.768'
AND (WLCS_DOCUMENT.ID IN (
SELECT
WLCS_DOCUMENT_METADATA.ID
FROM
WLCS_DOCUMENT_METADATA
WHERE
WLCS_DOCUMENT_METADATA.ID = WLCS_DOCUMENT.ID
AND WLCS_DOCUMENT_METADATA.NAME = 'startDate'
AND WLCS_DOCUMENT_METADATA.VALUE <= '2001-10-22 15:53:14.768'
AND ((WLCS_DOCUMENT.ID IN (
SELECT
WLCS_DOCUMENT_METADATA.ID
FROM
WLCS_DOCUMENT_METADATA
WHERE
WLCS_DOCUMENT_METADATA.ID = WLCS_DOCUMENT.ID
AND WLCS_DOCUMENT_METADATA.NAME = 'language'
AND WLCS_DOCUMENT_METADATA.VALUE = 'en'
AND ((WLCS_DOCUMENT.ID IN (
SELECT
WLCS_DOCUMENT_METADATA.ID
FROM
WLCS_DOCUMENT_METADATA
WHERE
WLCS_DOCUMENT_METADATA.ID = WLCS_DOCUMENT.ID
AND WLCS_DOCUMENT_METADATA.NAME = 'Country'
AND WLCS_DOCUMENT_METADATA.VALUE = 'nl'
)) OR (WLCS_DOCUMENT.ID IN (
SELECT
WLCS_DOCUMENT_METADATA.ID
FROM
WLCS_DOCUMENT_METADATA
WHERE
WLCS_DOCUMENT_METADATA.ID = WLCS_DOCUMENT.ID
AND WLCS_DOCUMENT_METADATA.NAME = 'Country'
AND WLCS_DOCUMENT_METADATA.VALUE = '*'
AND NOT (WLCS_DOCUMENT.ID IN (
SELECT
WLCS_DOCUMENT_METADATA.ID
FROM
WLCS_DOCUMENT_METADATA
WHERE
WLCS_DOCUMENT_METADATA.ID = WLCS_DOCUMENT.ID
AND WLCS_DOCUMENT_METADATA.NAME = 'excludeIds'
AND WLCS_DOCUMENT_METADATA.VALUE LIKE '%#7#%' ESCAPE '\'
AND (WLCS_DOCUMENT.ID IN (
SELECT
WLCS_DOCUMENT_METADATA.ID
FROM
WLCS_DOCUMENT_METADATA
WHERE
WLCS_DOCUMENT_METADATA.ID = WLCS_DOCUMENT.ID
AND WLCS_DOCUMENT_METADATA.NAME = 'userType'
AND WLCS_DOCUMENT_METADATA.VALUE = 'retailer'
At this moment, the server makes the user wait more than 10 min for the
query to execute.
This is what I found out about the problem:
1)When I run the query on an Oracle SQL client (We are using Oracle 8.1.7.0)
, it takes 5-10 seconds.
2)If I remove the second term of (CONTENT.Country='nl' ||
CONTENT.Country='*' ) in the custom query,
thus retricting to CONTENT.Country='nl', the performance is OK.
3)There are currently more or less 130 records in the DB that have
Country='*'
4)When I run the page on our QA server (solaris), which is at the same
time
our Oracle server,
the response time is OK, but if I run it on our development server (W2K),
response time is ridiculously long.
5)The problem happens also if I add the term (CONTENT.Country='nl' ||
CONTENT.Country='*' )
to the rule definition, and I remove this part from the custom query.
Am I missing something? Am I using the personalization server correctly?
Is this performance difference between QA and DEV due to differences
in the
OS?
Thank you,
Luis Muñiz

Large number of JSP performance

Hi,
a colleague of me made tests with a large number of JSP and identified a
performance problem.
I believe I found a solution to his problem. I tested it with WLS 5.1 SP2
and SP3 and MS jview SDK 4.
The issue was related to the duration of the initial call of the nth JSP,
our situation as we are doing site hosting.
The solution is able to perform around 14 initial invocations/s no matter if
the invocation is the first one or the
3000th one and the throughput can go up to 108 JSPs/s when the JSP are
already loaded, the JSPs being the
snoopservlet example copied 3000 times.
The ratio have more interest than the values as the test machine (client and
WLS 5.1) was a 266Mhz laptop.
I repeat the post of Marc on 2/11/2000 as it is an old one:
Hi all,
I'm wondering if any of you has experienced performance issue whendeploying
a lot of JSPs.
I'm running Weblogic 4.51SP4 with performance pack on NT4 and Jdk1.2.2.
I deployed over 3000 JSPs (identical but with a distinct name) on myserver.
I took care to precompile them off-line.
To run my tests I used a servlet selecting randomly one of them and
redirecting the request.
getServletContext().getRequestDispatcher(randomUrl).forward(request,response);
The response-time slow-down dramaticaly as the number of distinct JSPs
invoked is growing.
(up to 100 times the initial response time).
I made some additional tests.
When you set the properties:
weblogic.httpd.servlet.reloadCheckSecs=-1
weblogic.httpd.initArgs.*.jsp=..., pageCheckSeconds=-1, ...
Then the response-time for a new JSP seems linked to a "capacity increase
process" and depends on the number of previously activated JSPs. If you
invoke a previously loaded page the server answers really fast with no
delay.
If you set previous properties to any other value (0 for example) the
response-time remains bad even when you invoke a previously loaded page.SOLUTION DESCRIPTION
Intent
The package described below is design to allow
* Fast invocation even with a large number of pages (which can be the case
with Web Hosting)
* Dynamic update of compiled JSP
Implementation
The current implementation has been tested with JDK 1.1 only and works with
MS SDK 4.0.
It has been tested with WLS 5.1 with service packs 2 and 3.
It should work with most application servers, as its requirements are
limited. It requires
a JSP to be able to invoke a class loader.
Principle
For a fast invocation, it does not support dynamic compilation as described
in the JSP
model.
There is no automatic recognition of modifications. Instead a JSP is made
available to
invalidate pages which must be updated.
We assume pages managed through this package to be declared in
weblogic.properties as
weblogic.httpd.register.*.ocg=ocgLoaderPkg.ocgServlet
This definition means that, when a servlet or JSP with a .ocg extension is
requested, it is
forwarded to the package.
It implies 2 things:
* Regular JSP handling and package based handling can coexist in the same
Application Server
instance.
* It is possible to extend the implementation to support many extensions
with as many
package instances.
The package (ocgLoaderPkg) contains 2 classes:
* ocgServlet, a servlet instantiating JSP objects using a class loader.
* ocgLoader, the class loader itself.
A single class loader object is created.
Both the JSP instances and classes are cached in hashtables.
The invalidation JSP is named jspUpdate.jsp.
To invalidate an JSP, it has simply to remove object and cache entries from
the caches.
ocgServlet
* Lazily creates the class loader.
* Retrieves the target JSP instance from the cache, if possible.
* Otherwise it uses the class loader to retrieve the target JSP class,
create a target JSP
instance and stores it in the cache.
* Forwards the request to the target JSP instance.
ocgLoader
* If the requested class has not the extension ocgServlet is configured to
process, it
behaves as a regular class loader and forwards the request to the parent
or system class
loader.
* Otherwise, it retrieves the class from the cache, if possible.
* Otherwise, it loads the class.
Do you thing it is a good solution?
I believe that solution is faster than standard WLS one, because it is a
very small piece of code but too because:
- my class loader is deterministic, if the file has the right extension I
don't call the classloader hierarchy first
- I don't try supporting jars. It has been one of the hardest design
decision. We definitely need a way to
update a specific page but at the same time someone post us NT could have
problems handling
3000 files in the same directory (it seems he was wrong).
- I don't try to check if a class has been updated. I have to ask for
refresh using a JSP now but it could be an EJB.
- I don't try to check if a source has been updated.
- As I know the number of JSP I can set pretty accurately the initial
capacity of the hashtables I use as caches. I
avoid rehash.

Use a profiler to find the bottlenecks in the system. You need to determine where the performance problems (if you even have any) are happening. We can't do that for you.

Large number of JSP performance [repost for grandemange]

Hi,
a colleague of me made tests with a large number of JSP and identified a
performance problem.
I believe I found a solution to his problem. I tested it with WLS 5.1 SP2
and SP3 and MS jview SDK 4.
The issue was related to the duration of the initial call of the nth JSP,
our situation as we are doing site hosting.
The solution is able to perform around 14 initial invocations/s no matter if
the invocation is the first one or the
3000th one and the throughput can go up to 108 JSPs/s when the JSP are
already loaded, the JSPs being the
snoopservlet example copied 3000 times.
The ratio have more interest than the values as the test machine (client and
WLS 5.1) was a 266Mhz laptop.
I repeat the post of Marc on 2/11/2000 as it is an old one:
Hi all,
I'm wondering if any of you has experienced performance issue whendeploying
a lot of JSPs.
I'm running Weblogic 4.51SP4 with performance pack on NT4 and Jdk1.2.2.
I deployed over 3000 JSPs (identical but with a distinct name) on myserver.
I took care to precompile them off-line.
To run my tests I used a servlet selecting randomly one of them and
redirecting the request.
getServletContext().getRequestDispatcher(randomUrl).forward(request,response);
The response-time slow-down dramaticaly as the number of distinct JSPs
invoked is growing.
(up to 100 times the initial response time).
I made some additional tests.
When you set the properties:
weblogic.httpd.servlet.reloadCheckSecs=-1
weblogic.httpd.initArgs.*.jsp=..., pageCheckSeconds=-1, ...
Then the response-time for a new JSP seems linked to a "capacity increase
process" and depends on the number of previously activated JSPs. If you
invoke a previously loaded page the server answers really fast with no
delay.
If you set previous properties to any other value (0 for example) the
response-time remains bad even when you invoke a previously loaded page.SOLUTION DESCRIPTION
Intent
The package described below is design to allow
* Fast invocation even with a large number of pages (which can be the case
with Web Hosting)
* Dynamic update of compiled JSP
Implementation
The current implementation has been tested with JDK 1.1 only and works with
MS SDK 4.0.
It has been tested with WLS 5.1 with service packs 2 and 3.
It should work with most application servers, as its requirements are
limited. It requires
a JSP to be able to invoke a class loader.
Principle
For a fast invocation, it does not support dynamic compilation as described
in the JSP
model.
There is no automatic recognition of modifications. Instead a JSP is made
available to
invalidate pages which must be updated.
We assume pages managed through this package to be declared in
weblogic.properties as
weblogic.httpd.register.*.ocg=ocgLoaderPkg.ocgServlet
This definition means that, when a servlet or JSP with a .ocg extension is
requested, it is
forwarded to the package.
It implies 2 things:
* Regular JSP handling and package based handling can coexist in the same
Application Server
instance.
* It is possible to extend the implementation to support many extensions
with as many
package instances.
The package (ocgLoaderPkg) contains 2 classes:
* ocgServlet, a servlet instantiating JSP objects using a class loader.
* ocgLoader, the class loader itself.
A single class loader object is created.
Both the JSP instances and classes are cached in hashtables.
The invalidation JSP is named jspUpdate.jsp.
To invalidate an JSP, it has simply to remove object and cache entries from
the caches.
ocgServlet
* Lazily creates the class loader.
* Retrieves the target JSP instance from the cache, if possible.
* Otherwise it uses the class loader to retrieve the target JSP class,
create a target JSP
instance and stores it in the cache.
* Forwards the request to the target JSP instance.
ocgLoader
* If the requested class has not the extension ocgServlet is configured to
process, it
behaves as a regular class loader and forwards the request to the parent
or system class
loader.
* Otherwise, it retrieves the class from the cache, if possible.
* Otherwise, it loads the class.
Do you thing it is a good solution?
I believe that solution is faster than standard WLS one, because it is a
very small piece of code but too because:
- my class loader is deterministic, if the file has the right extension I
don't call the classloader hierarchy first
- I don't try supporting jars. It has been one of the hardest design
decision. We definitely need a way to
update a specific page but at the same time someone post us NT could have
problems handling
3000 files in the same directory (it seems he was wrong).
- I don't try to check if a class has been updated. I have to ask for
refresh using a JSP now but it could be an EJB.
- I don't try to check if a source has been updated.
- As I know the number of JSP I can set pretty accurately the initial
capacity of the hashtables I use as caches. I
avoid rehash.
Cheers - Wei

I dont know the upper limit, but I think 80 is too much. I have never used more than 15-20. For Nav attributes, a seperate tables are created which causes the Performance issue as result in new join at query run time. Just ask your business guy, if these can be reduced.One way could be to model these attributes as seperate characteristics. It will certainly help.
Thanks...
Shambhu

Out.print performance problems?

Hi
I'm facing strange performance problems I would not expect generating long html pages on the fly.
I have a page that is approximately 30 to 40Kb long. Profiling code generation I obtain a 30 second time to process. I have excluded every server-side processing activity since I have also used a StringBuffer to accumulate all the html code to be flushed: generating the StringBuffer content require less than 1ms... flushing out the content with:
out.print(stb);
out.flush()
is taking 5 to 6 seconds. The same happens both on a development environment using CQ servlet engine, both in production where we are using CQ with JBoss as app server.
I tried the same operation on a simple tomcat installation with a JSP... less than 10 ms to generate the full page.
This problem is slowing down a lot performances.
The contents are generated inside a nested component included with a <cq:include> tag.
Anyone can give me suggestions on how to cut down a so big delay in html content generation?
thanks

I made further analysis and now I can give a clearer scenario.
The *very low* performances has been registered on CQ 5.2.1 when generating html code full of relative links. Every link *cost* big processing time. With 60-70 links the component ends up paying 3 to 4 seconds (too much!).
The same component on a CQ 5.4 instance takes approximately 500 milliseconds, still too much considering that without link the same html code is generated in less than 10 milliseconds.
The reason is clearly in the filters applied in the output pipeline --> link checker? remapping on links based on etc/map configurations?
How can I change configurations in order to avoid these performance problems?
thanks
Ignazio

Performance problem with CR SDK

Hi,
I'am currently on a customer site and I have the following problem :
The client have a performance problem with a J2EE application wich call a Crystal report with th CR SDK. To reproduce the problem on the local machine (the CR server), I have developped a little jsp page wich used the Crystal SDK to open a Crystal report on the server (this report is based on a XML data source), setting the new data source (with a new xml data flow) and refresh the report in PDF format.
The problem is that the 2 first sequences take about 5 seconde each (5 sec for the opening report and 5 seconds for the setting data source). Then the total process take about 15 seconds to open and refresh the document that is very long for a little document.
The document is a 600Ko file, the xml source is a 80Ko file.
My jsp page is directly deployed on the tomcat of the Crystal Report Server (CRXIR2 without Service Pack).
The Filestore and the MySQL database are on the CR server.
The server is a 4 quadripro (16 proc) with 16Go of RAM and is totally dedicated to Crystal Report. For the moment, there is no activity on the server (it is also used for the test).
The mains jsp orders are the followings :
IEnterpriseSession es = CrystalEnterprise.getSessionMgr().logon("administrator", "", "EDITBI:6400", "secEnterprise");
    IInfoStore infoStore = (IInfoStore) es.getService("", "InfoStore");
    IInfoObjects infoObjects = infoStore.query("SELECT * FROM CI_INFOOBJECTS WHERE SI_NAME='CPA_EV' AND SI_INSTANCE=0 ");
    IInfoObject report = (IInfoObject) infoObjects.get(0);
IReportAppFactory reportAppFactory = (IReportAppFactory)es.getService("RASReportFactory");
ReportClientDocument reportClientDoc = reportAppFactory.openDocument(report.getID(), 0, null);
IXMLDataSet xmlDataSet = new XMLDataSet();
xmlDataSet.setXMLData(new ByteArray(ligne_data_xml));
xmlDataSet.setXMLSchema(new ByteArray(ligne_schema_xml));
DatabaseController db = reportClientDoc.getDatabaseController();
db.setDataSource(xmlDataSet, "", "");
ByteArrayInputStream bt = (ByteArrayInputStream)reportClientDoc.getPrintOutputController().export(ReportExportFormat.PDF);
My question is : does this method is the good one to do this ?
Thank's in advance for your help
Best regards
Emmanuel

Hi,
My problem is not resolved and I have'nt news from the support.
If you have any idea/info, don't forget me
Thank's in advance
Emmanuel

JSP Performance Troubleshooting

I am running into some performance problems with my JSP application. We are using JRun as the server. My page is executing a stored procedure in SQL Server, storing the data from the resultset in an arraylist of objects that I created to store the data and displaying the data in increments of 50 in an html page. I store the arraylist as a session attribute.
In one particular example the resultset is 278 records. The stored procedure takes about a second to run using the Query Analyzer. The page takes several minutes to display.
Does anyone know where I should begin to look to improve the performance of this page? I could post the code from the page, but I didn't want to just throw that out there without a specific question about it.
Thanks for your time.
Matt

If you are facing this problem for large amount of records that you are trying to retrive and trying to do tha pagination in jsp then you may also think in this following way to to improve performance.
I'm not sure how far it will be useful for you but its just my idea.
1.First dont keep the ArrayList object in session.
2.dont retrive all records and retrive only current page rows from database that you want to display on the jsp
3.when you click next for pagination again retrive only current page rows.
let me know if you need more info

Severe performance problem

Hi,
We have developed a e-commerce application using weblogic 4.5.1. We use
jdk1.2.2 and have installed service pack 7.
We use a progress database with a jdbc driver provided by Merant.
This jdbc driver doesn't support connection pooling so we get the connection
each time we need it.
We developed some servlets and jsp pages, also compiled using jdk1.2.2.
The problem we have is that there is one query that when we execute it,
results in a time out error after 3 minutes. The keepalivesecs are set to
more than 6000 secs. It is according to me not a problem of neither the
database nor the jdbc driver, since I tested the same code without using
weblogic and the servlet. Then the query performs fine. After 10 secs I get
the disered result.(run on a client machine).
I have looked at the performance tuning document but there is not much
information about how to handle this. Even if there is only 1 (one) user
connected performance is terrible.
Kind regards,
Patrick

Hi,
We have a similiar setup and also have performance problems.
We are using Weblogic 4.5.1 towards a Sybase database.
We are using JSP (pages) and it doesn't seem to be the actual
application that needs tuning(?). It more looks like it is some
weserver/application server setup somewhere.
The site is at http://www.awardit.se (it's in swedish though).
Any ideas/solutions?
Best Regards
Kenneth Ljunggren
"Patrick Vanbrabant" <[email protected]> skrev i meddelandet
news:8a8kmb$jso$[email protected]..
Hi,
We have developed a e-commerce application using weblogic 4.5.1. We use
jdk1.2.2 and have installed service pack 7.
We use a progress database with a jdbc driver provided by Merant.
This jdbc driver doesn't support connection pooling so we get theconnection
each time we need it.
We developed some servlets and jsp pages, also compiled using jdk1.2.2.
The problem we have is that there is one query that when we execute it,
results in a time out error after 3 minutes. The keepalivesecs are set to
more than 6000 secs. It is according to me not a problem of neither the
database nor the jdbc driver, since I tested the same code without using
weblogic and the servlet. Then the query performs fine. After 10 secs Iget
the disered result.(run on a client machine).
I have looked at the performance tuning document but there is not much
information about how to handle this. Even if there is only 1 (one) user
connected performance is terrible.
Kind regards,
Patrick

PL/SQL Performance problem

I am facing a performance problem with my current application (PL/SQL packaged procedure)
My application takes data from 4 temporary tables, does a lot of validation and
puts them into permanent tables.(updates if present else inserts)
One of the temporary tables is parent table and can have 0 or more rows in
the other tables.
I have analyzed all my tables and indexes and checked all my SQLs
They all seem to be using the indexes correctly.
There are 1.6 million records combined in all 4 tables.
I am using Oracle 8i.
How do I determine what is causing the problem and which part is taking time.
Please help.
The skeleton of the code which we have written looks like this
MAIN LOOP ( 255308 records)-- Parent temporary table
-----lots of validation-----
update permanent_table1
if sql%rowcount = 0 then
insert into permanent_table1
Loop2 (0-5 records)-- child temporary table1
-----lots of validation-----
update permanent_table2
if sql%rowcount = 0 then
insert into permanent_table2
end loop2
Loop3 (0-5 records)-- child temporary table2
-----lots of validation-----
update permanent_table3
if sql%rowcount = 0 then
insert into permanent_table3
end loop3
Loop4 (0-5 records)-- child temporary table3
-----lots of validation-----
update permanent_table4
if sql%rowcount = 0 then
insert into permanent_table4
end loop4
-- COMMIT after every 3000 records
END MAIN LOOP
Thanks
Ashwin N.

Do this intead of ditching the PL/SQL.
DECLARE
TYPE NumTab IS TABLE OF NUMBER(4) INDEX BY BINARY_INTEGER;
TYPE NameTab IS TABLE OF CHAR(15) INDEX BY BINARY_INTEGER;
pnums NumTab;
pnames NameTab;
t1 NUMBER(5);
t2 NUMBER(5);
t3 NUMBER(5);
BEGIN
FOR j IN 1..5000 LOOP -- load index-by tables
pnums(j) := j;
pnames(j) := 'Part No. ' || TO_CHAR(j);
END LOOP;
t1 := dbms_utility.get_time;
FOR i IN 1..5000 LOOP -- use FOR loop
INSERT INTO parts VALUES (pnums(i), pnames(i));
END LOOP;
t2 := dbms_utility.get_time;
FORALL i IN 1..5000 -- use FORALL statement
INSERT INTO parts VALUES (pnums(i), pnames(i));
get_time(t3);
dbms_output.put_line('Execution Time (secs)');
dbms_output.put_line('---------------------');
dbms_output.put_line('FOR loop: ' || TO_CHAR(t2 - t1));
dbms_output.put_line('FORALL: ' || TO_CHAR(t3 - t2));
END;
Try this link, http://download-west.oracle.com/docs/cd/B10501_01/appdev.920/a96624/05_colls.htm#23723

Re: [iPlanet-JATO] sp3 jsp compiler problem

Weiguo,
First, Matt is correct, the regular expression tool is perfect for general text
substitution situations, and as a completely independent tool its use is not
restricted to migration situations (or file types for that matter).
Second, I sympathize with the unfortunate trouble you are experiencing due to
Jasper's (perhaps more strict) compilation, but in what way did the iMT
automated translation contribute to these inconsistencies that you cited?
1. Changed the case of the tag attribute to be the same as what's
defined in tld.
example: changed OnClick to onClick
The iMT does not generate any OnClick or onClick clauses per se. In a
translation situation, the only way "OnClick" would have been introduced was if
it had been part of the pre-existing project's "extraHTML" (which was written
by the original customer and just passed through unchanged by the iMT) or if it
was added manually by the post-migration developer.
2. Removed attributes which are not defined in tld.
example: escape attribute only defined in three tags
but in some pages, it's used although it's not defined as an
attribute
of certain tags. The jasper compiler doesn't like it.Can you give soem examples? Is there a definite pattern? Again, this might be
similar to the OnClick situation described above?
3. In an end tag, there can't be any space.
example: </content > doesn't work. </content> works.
Again, the content tag would never have been generated by the iMT. There was no
equivalent in the NetDynamics world, so any content tags in your code must have
been introduced by your developers manually. Its a shame that jasper is so
particular, but the iMT could not help you out here even if we wanted to. The
constants that are used by the iMT are defined in
com.iplanet.moko.jsp.convert.JspConversionConstants. From what I can see, the
only situation of a closing tag with any space in it is
public static final String CLOSE_EMPTY_ELEMENT = " />";
But that should not cause the type of problem you are referring to.
Mike
----- Original Message -----
From: Matthew Stevens
Sent: Thursday, September 06, 2001 10:16 AM
Subject: RE: [iPlanet-JATO] sp3 jsp compiler problem
Weiguo,
Others will chime in for sure...I would highly recommend the Regex Tool from
the iMT 1.1.1 for tackling this type of problem. Mike, Todd and myself have
posted to the group (even recently) on directions and advantages of creating
your own RULES (rules file) in XML for arbitary batch processing of source.
matt
-----Original Message-----
From: weiguo.wang@b...
[mailto:<a href="/group/SunONE-JATO/post?protectID=125056020108194190033029175101192165174144234026000079108238073194105057099246073154180137239239223019162">weiguo.wang@b...</a>]
Sent: Thursday, September 06, 2001 12:25 PM
Subject: [iPlanet-JATO] sp3 jsp compiler problem
Matt/Mike/Todd,
We are trying to migrate to sp3 right now, but have had a lot of
issues with the new jasper compiler.
The following workaround has been employed to solve the issues:
1. Changed the case of the tag attribute to be the same as what's
defined in tld.
example: changed OnClick to onClick
2. Removed attributes which are not defined in tld.
example: escape attribute only defined in three tags
but in some pages, it's used although it's not defined as an
attribute
of certain tags. The jasper compiler doesn't like it.
3. In an end tag, there can't be any space.
example: </content > doesn't work. </content> works.
As I see it, we have two options to go about solving this problem:
1. Write a script which will iterate through all the jsp files and
call jspc on them. Fix the errors manually when jspc fails. Jspc will
flag the line number where an error occurs.
2. Write a utility which scans the jsp files and fix the errors when
they are encountered. We should define what's an error and how to
correct it. It's best if we combine this with solution 1 since we
might miss an error condition.
Actually, there might be another option, which is seeking help from
you guys since you have better understanding of JATO and iAS. Can you
do anything to help us?
We would be happy to hear your thoughts.
At last, I would like to suggest modifying the moko tool so that
these rules are enforced and the generated JSPs work with the new
compiler. This is for the benefit of any new migration projects.
Thanks a lot.
Weiguo
[email protected]
Choose from 1000s of job listings!
[email protected]
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Thanks a lot Matt and Mike for your prompt replies.
I agree completely that iMT doesn't introduce the inconsistencies.
About the three cases I mentioned, the third one happens only in
manually created JSPs. So it has nothing to do with iMT. The first
two are mainly due to the existing HTML code, as you rightly pointed
out.
The reason I made the suggestion is since we know that case 1 and 2
won't pass the japser compiler in sp3, we have to do something about
it. The best place to do this, in my mind, is iMT. Of course, there
might be some twists that make it impossible or difficult to do this
kind of case manipulation or attribute discard.
Weiguo
--- In iPlanet-JATO@y..., "Mike Frisino" <Michael.Frisino@S...> wrote:
Weiguo,
First, Matt is correct, the regular expression tool is perfect for general text substitution situations, and as a completely independent
tool its use is not restricted to migration situations (or file types
for that matter).
>
Second, I sympathize with the unfortunate trouble you are experiencing due to Jasper's (perhaps more strict) compilation, but
in what way did the iMT automated translation contribute to these
inconsistencies that you cited?
>
1. Changed the case of the tag attribute to be the same as what's
defined in tld.
example: changed OnClick to onClick
The iMT does not generate any OnClick or onClick clauses per se. In a translation situation, the only way "OnClick" would have been
introduced was if it had been part of the pre-existing
project's "extraHTML" (which was written by the original customer and
just passed through unchanged by the iMT) or if it was added manually
by the post-migration developer.
>
2. Removed attributes which are not defined in tld.
example: escape attribute only defined in three tags
but in some pages, it's used although it's not defined as an
attribute
of certain tags. The jasper compiler doesn't like it.Can you give soem examples? Is there a definite pattern? Again, this might be similar to the OnClick situation described above?
>
>
3. In an end tag, there can't be any space.
example: </content > doesn't work. </content> works.
Again, the content tag would never have been generated by the iMT. There was no equivalent in the NetDynamics world, so any content tags
in your code must have been introduced by your developers manually.
Its a shame that jasper is so particular, but the iMT could not help
you out here even if we wanted to. The constants that are used by the
iMT are defined in
com.iplanet.moko.jsp.convert.JspConversionConstants. From what I can
see, the only situation of a closing tag with any space in it is
public static final String CLOSE_EMPTY_ELEMENT = " />";
But that should not cause the type of problem you are referring to.
Mike
----- Original Message -----
From: Matthew Stevens
Sent: Thursday, September 06, 2001 10:16 AM
Subject: RE: [iPlanet-JATO] sp3 jsp compiler problem
Weiguo,
Others will chime in for sure...I would highly recommend the Regex Tool from
the iMT 1.1.1 for tackling this type of problem. Mike, Todd and myself have
posted to the group (even recently) on directions and advantages of creating
your own RULES (rules file) in XML for arbitary batch processing of source.
>
matt
-----Original Message-----
From: weiguo.wang@b...
[mailto:<a href="/group/SunONE-JATO/post?protectID=125056020108194190033029175101192165174048139046">weiguo.wang@b...</a>]
Sent: Thursday, September 06, 2001 12:25 PM
Subject: [iPlanet-JATO] sp3 jsp compiler problem
Matt/Mike/Todd,
We are trying to migrate to sp3 right now, but have had a lot of
issues with the new jasper compiler.
The following workaround has been employed to solve the issues:
1. Changed the case of the tag attribute to be the same as
what's
defined in tld.
example: changed OnClick to onClick
2. Removed attributes which are not defined in tld.
example: escape attribute only defined in three tags
but in some pages, it's used although it's not defined as an
attribute
of certain tags. The jasper compiler doesn't like it.
3. In an end tag, there can't be any space.
example: </content > doesn't work. </content> works.
As I see it, we have two options to go about solving this problem:
>>
1. Write a script which will iterate through all the jsp files and
call jspc on them. Fix the errors manually when jspc fails. Jspc will
flag the line number where an error occurs.
2. Write a utility which scans the jsp files and fix the errors when
they are encountered. We should define what's an error and how to
correct it. It's best if we combine this with solution 1 since we
might miss an error condition.
Actually, there might be another option, which is seeking help from
you guys since you have better understanding of JATO and iAS. Can you
do anything to help us?
We would be happy to hear your thoughts.
At last, I would like to suggest modifying the moko tool so that
these rules are enforced and the generated JSPs work with the new
compiler. This is for the benefit of any new migration projects.
Thanks a lot.
Weiguo
[email protected]
Choose from 1000s of job listings!
[email protected]
Service.
>
>
>
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Performance problem in Zstick report...

Hi Experts,
I am facing performance problem in Custoom Stock report of Material Management.
In this report i am fetching all the materials with its batches to get the desired output, at a time this report executes 36,000 plus unique combination of material and batch.
This report takes around 30 mins to execute. And this report is to be viewed regularly in every 2 hours.
To read the batch characteristics value I am using FM -> '/SAPMP/CE1_BATCH_GET_DETAIL'
Is there any way out to increase the performance of this report, the output of the report is in ALV.
May i have any refresh button in the report so that data may get refreshed automatically without executing it again. or is there any cache memory concept.
Note: I have declared all the itabs with type sorted, all the select queries are fetched with key and index.
Thanks
Rohit Gharwar

Hello,
SE30 is old. Switch on trace on ST12 while running this progarm and identify where exactly most of the time is being spent. If you see high CPU time this problem with the ABAP code. You can exactly figure out the program/function module from ST12 trace where exactly time is being spent. If you see high database time in ST12, problem is with database related issue. So basically you have to analyze sql statement from performance traces in ST12. These could resolve your issue.
Yours Sincerely
Dileep

SQL report performance problem

I have a SQL classic report in Apex 4.0.2 and database 11.2.0.2.0 with a performance problem.
The report is based on a PL/SQL function returning a query. The query is based on a view and pl/sql functions. The Apex parsing schema has select grant on the view only, not the underlying objects.
The generated query runs in 1-2 sec in sqlplus (logged in as the Apex parsing schema user), but takes many minutes in Apex. I have found, by monitoring the database sessions via TOAD, that the explain plan in the Apex and sqlplus sessions are very different.
The summary:
In sqlplus SELECT STATEMENT ALL_ROWS Cost: 3,695
In Apex SELECT STATEMENT ALL_ROWS Cost: 3,108,551
What could be the cause of this?
I found a blog and Metalink note about different explain plans for different users. They suggested to set optimizer_secure_view_merging='FALSE', but that didn't help.

Hmmm, it runs fast again in SQL Workshop. I didn't expect that, because both the application and SQL Workshop use SYS.DBMS_SYS_SQL to parse the query.
Only the explain plan doesn't show anything.
To add: I changed the report source to the query the pl/sql function would generate, so the selects are the same in SQL Workshop and in the application. Still in the application it's horribly slow.
So, Apex does do something different in the application compared to SQL Workshop.
Edited by: InoL on Aug 5, 2011 4:50 PM

JSP Performance Problem

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for