LabVIEW 8.2 - Custom Probe mystery behavior

Hi:
I recently updated code built in v7.1 to v8.2. In one section, I have a simple wire that contains I16 data array. When I put a probe on the wire, the probe shows the data as it should. When I select a custom probe via 'custom probe,' 'controls,' 'waveform graph.', the waveform graph probe remains grayed and does not show the data. Had no problem with this in v7.1.
Attachments:
mystery_probe_behavior.vi ‏13 KB

Interesting...
I can confirm that it does not work for integer probes (tried I16, I32, U32). It works if the data is set to DBL.
(Downconverted, all data types work fine in LabVIEW 8.0.)
My vote is that this is a bug, and a pretty annoying one.
Message Edited by altenbach on 08-29-2006 08:43 AM
LabVIEW Champion . Do more with less code and in less time .

Similar Messages

LVOOP Custom Probe Question

Hello,
I just read up a lot about custom probes and want to use them in a class system I set up. I wanted to have the parent class be the only one that actually has a probe, as it can call a method vi to get some dynamic information with no problem. I set it up, and the general probe of the parent class works great in the parent class, but it doesn't get called when I probe any of the child classes. Is this how it should be working? I already set the probe in the parent class properties to use the custom probe, and I don't want to have to make a bunch of child probes. I wanted to have the probe only be a part of the class because if it is outside the class, the probe will load with labview, along with the children classes, which adds up to about 1000 VIs that get loaded, all for a probe I may not use unless I am using the class.
Any help would be appreciated.

Hi Britoa,
I found that this is a known bug. This was reported to R&D (# 46P7BRWS) for further investigation. Thanks you for reporting it though. We are always working to improve LabVIEW.
Nick R
NI

Adding an "IMAQ Image.ctl" to the "Display State.ctl" of an XControl prevents LabVIEW from creating a probe of "Display State.ctl"

I am working on an extended IMAQ Display control using LabVIEWs XControl capabilities.
I need a copy of the original image passed to add some overlays which must not affect the original image. To achieve this I am creating a backup image in the "Init.vi" and deleting it in the "Uninit.vi". I am storing the reference of this image in the "Display State.ctl" which is part of every XControl.
As soon as I am adding an "IMAQ Image.ctl" to the Display State cluster, it is no longer possible to generate a probe of the Display State cluster for debugging purposses. I am always getting the message: "Failed to load or create probe."
Deleting the "IMAQ Image.ctl" from the cluster makes the probe working again.
Is it a bug or am I doing something wrong?
I am working with LabVIEW 8.5 and Vision 8.5.
Regards
Ingo Bartsch

Hello Mr. Bartsch,
is it possible for you to post a small example to reproduce the behaviour? It would be helpful to get a description in which way you use the typedef files.
I found a example/knowledge base where some informations were included to XControl and LV but not with Vision.
http://digital.ni.com/public.nsf/allkb/1DC1ADD2A136DA298625712C00635758?OpenDocument
Best wishes
Jan Kniewasser
Jan Kniewasser | Applications Engineer | Tel.: +49 89 7413130 | Fax: +49 89 7146035

How to use LabVIEW FPGA on Custom FPGA board other than NI products .....Also how to develop RTx DLL for a customised motion controller hardware

I'm using RTx, LabVIEW RT and LabVIEW FPGA.
The GUI is windows based. The motion control and FPGA are RTx based.
Is there any way to develop device drivers for the custom hardware in RTx. For example motion controller hardware, FPGA hardware, PCI hardware.
Is there a possibility to use custom FPGA boards to use with LabVIEW FPGA.
Please send me some links
Thanks
Bhoopathy
Take life as it comes! you may never know what's gonna happen Tommorrow

CODE WARRIOR Hello. I believe this question was answered in a previous post. Please let us know if you have any new questioins or if you need some clarification.
You are able to develop device drivers for your custom hardware using the NI Measurement Hardware Driver Development Kit.
However, it is not possible to use custom FPGA boards with LabVIEW FPGA. The FPGA boards have to be one of our R Series boards. Here are some links that should shed some light on the Measurement Hardware DDK.
Measurement Hardware Driver Development Kit Frequently Asked Questions
NI Measurement Hardware DDK (Driver Development Kit)
Please post if you have further questios.
Efosa O.
NIAE

Machine config entry of wcf custom end point behavior on deployment

Hi All,
We have created a custom wcf end point behavior and added to the wcf-custom isolated adapter.We are in the process of creating deployment package where we are struggling to add the wcf behavior detail in the machine config automatically but not manually(we
have 4 prd biztalk server).
Is there any tool or way to add the wcf behavior detail in the machine config without manual steps.We are using BTDF deployment tool to create a package but could not find a way to do using BTDF.
Thanks in advance.
Manish

Hi Manish,
Personally, I would not include the machine.config file in BizTalk deployment MSI. I would keep it separate process, as this file not specific to BizTalk alone, but depended on other programs in the machine.
Anyway, if you still need a way to add machine.config file (or any resource file). This is where the combination of "AdditionalFiles" tags under "ItemGroup" and "Target" comes in to use.
As per the BTDF document
"The AdditionalFiles ItemGroup is appropriate for any files that do not fall into a more specific ItemGroup that need to be packaged in the MSI and installed on the server along
with your application."
"To include miscellaneous individual files (vs. an entire folder or a large number of files) in the MSI, you may simply include one or both of the ItemGroup's
ExternalAssemblies(.NET DLL's to be installed in the GAC) or
AdditionalFiles(miscellaneous files). They will be automatically included in the MSI.
Following cnfig is for specifying the machine.config into the msi
<ItemGroup>
<AdditionalFiles Include="machine.config">
<LocationPath>..\SupportingConfig</LocationPath>
</AdditionalFiles>
</ItemGroup>
And use the "Target" add the included file in the destination location.
Reference: In the following BTDF documentation, search for terms "MSBuild ItemGroups" and "Packaging
an Application for Deployment"
http://www.tfabraham.com/BTDFDocs/V5_0/DeploymentFrameworkForBizTalkDocs.html?Step2CreateaBTDFProject.html
If this answers your question please mark it accordingly. If this post is helpful, please vote as helpful by clicking the upward arrow mark next to my reply.

"Disable tracing" as part of custom step type behavior

Hi !
Currently writing custom step types based on sequences (my step type's default adapter is a sequence), I would like to set the "disable tracing" right in my step type definition.
The problem is that this option isn't visible in the 'Default Run Options" tab... The only way I found to do this is using Pre and Post Expression to set 'ThisContext.Tracing = True /False'.
But I don't like the fact to use Pre/Post Expressions in my step type (I would prefer to let it blank for end users).
Is there any way to achieve this without using Expressions ?
Solved!
Go to Solution.

Here a printscreen on the properties available for my custom step... No TS container...
Am I missing something ?
Attachments:
Step Prop.png ‏15 KB

Editor Kit Mystery behavior. I don't get how this works.

I build a JTextPane which is editable, save it to a file, and load it back after which it's editing behavior is completely whacked out.
The text region is originally built like this:
 textRegion = new JTextPane();
 StyledDocument doc = textRegion.getStyledDocument();
 MutableAttributeSet attr = new SimpleAttributeSet();
 StyleConstants.setForeground(attr, Color.black);
 if ( text!=null ) {
 try {
 doc.insertString(doc.getLength(), text, attr);
 catch (BadLocationException ble) {
 System.err.println("Couldn't insert initial text into text pane.");
 ...After which I can edit the text and change font, size, color, bold, and italic.
Then I save the contents as a string put into a larger XML file like this:
 public String getXmlText() {
 // translate content and all its embedded style attributes into XML
 // Using class: MinimalHTMLWriter
 CharArrayWriter writer = null;
 try {
 writer = new CharArrayWriter();
 MinimalHTMLWriter htmlWriter = new MinimalHTMLWriter(writer, (StyledDocument)textRegion.getDocument());
 htmlWriter.write();
 catch (IOException ex) {
 System.out.println("Save error");
 catch (BadLocationException ex) {
 System.out.println("HTML File Corrupt");
 finally {
 if (writer != null) {
 writer.close();
 return writer.toString();
 }Then I reload the contents from HTML String in the saved XML file like this:
 public void setXmlText( String text ) {
 // Translate HTML in "text" into styled document
 System.out.println(text);
 CharArrayReader reader = new CharArrayReader( text.toCharArray() );
 textRegion.setContentType("text/html");
 textRegion.setText(text);
 }After which the editing of the text in the JTextPane is completely messed up.
For example, I type the text "16 point", highlight it and set it to 16 point
font and what ends up in the saved document looks like this:
 
 
 1
 
 
 6
 
 
 
 
 p
 
 
 o
 
 
 i
 
 
 n
 
 
 t
 
 Not only the wrong font size, but it puts paragraph tags between every single character I type! Why is this behaving so strangely?
Thanks for any insights.
--gary

Thanks,
Well I guess there's always the solution of parsing out the HTML tags and rebuilding the document by applying styles, the way it was built in the first place.
--gary

Custom Login Module Behavior (JAAS)...Help!

Problem: After successful authentication through a custom login module, the screen stays on the login screen and does not go to the iview you clicked on...
I have created a login module as documented [here|http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw04s/helpdata/en/46/3ce9402f3f8031e10000000a1550b0/frameset.htm].
I have added a new entry in the authschemes.xml file:
<authscheme name="cglogon">
 <authentication-template>
 form
 </authentication-template>
 <priority>21</priority>
 <frontendtype>2</frontendtype>
 <frontendtarget>com.sap.portal.runtime.logon.certlogon</frontendtarget>
 </authscheme>
As you can see above, i wanted to try to use the standard sap screen: com.sap.portal.runtime.logon.certlogon
Also, the logon module stack called "form" contains one and only one login module: mycompany.com.CGLoginModuleClass (REQUISITE)
Here is also the code to my Login() method of my module:
 public boolean login() throws LoginException
 Exception exception_on_the_way = null;
 String passwordString = "";
 NameCallback nc = new NameCallback("User:");
 PasswordCallback pc = new PasswordCallback("Password:", false);
 Callback[] callbacks = new Callback[] { nc, pc };
 try
 callbackHandler.handle(callbacks);
 catch (IOException e)
 exception_on_the_way = e;
 catch (UnsupportedCallbackException e)
 exception_on_the_way = e;
 String userid = nc.getName();
 char[] password = pc.getPassword();
 pc.clearPassword();
 if (userid.length() == 0)
 throw new LoginException(MISSING_UID);
 else
 userName = userid;
 if (password.length == 0)
 throw new LoginException(MISSING_PASSWORD);
 else
 passwordString = new String(password);
 try
 refreshUserInfo(userName);
 catch (SecurityException e)
 exception_on_the_way = e;
 if (exception_on_the_way != null)
 // A productive application should write an entry
 // into the trace here
 exception_on_the_way.printStackTrace();
 throw new LoginException("Could not handle callbacks");
 String eccLoginResult = "";
 //eccLoginResult = validateECCAuthentication(userName, passwordString);
 if (!eccLoginResult.equals(""))
 //throwNewLoginException(eccLoginResult);
 //throw new LoginException(USER_AUTH_FAILED);
 throwNewLoginException("Wrong UserId/Password", LoginExceptionDetails.WRONG_USERNAME_PASSWORD_COMBINATION);
 else
 successful = true;
 if (sharedState.get(AbstractLoginModule.NAME) == null)
 sharedState.put(AbstractLoginModule.NAME, userName);
 nameSet = true;
 return true;
I set up a random iview in the portal to use our new authentication scheme: cglogon by changing the iview property Authentication Scheme.
After clicking the logon button, My login() method gets called and sucessful is set to true. Also the commit() method gets called.
Problem: However, the screen gets redirected to the logon screen again...
Here is the trace in the logs:
Used Passport Type: 3
#[Security Context : [Security Session (3929) for kcf created at Thu Nov 06 08:40:44 PST 2008]]#
#1.5 #0018FE8C6FD8007200003781000041C100045B07FD434AB8#1225989778316#com.sap.engine.services.security.sessionmanagement##com.sap.engine.services.security.sessionmanagement#kcf#3929##castoldi_EPX_176065950#KCF#a839a030ac2111ddb3dd0018fe8c6fd8#SAPEngine_Application_Thread[impl:3]_35##0#0#Debug##Java###Persistent listeners of {0} notified#1#[Security Context : [Security Session (3929) for kcf created at Thu Nov 06 08:40:44 PST 2008]]#
#1.5 #0018FE8C6FD8007200003782000041C100045B07FD4353D2#1225989778319#com.sap.engine.services.security.authentication.programmatic#sap.com/irj#com.sap.engine.services.security.authentication.programmatic.logon#kcf#3929##castoldi_EPX_176065950#KCF#a839a030ac2111ddb3dd0018fe8c6fd8#SAPEngine_Application_Thread[impl:3]_35##0#0#Path##Java###Entering method with ({0})#1#com.sap.engine.services.servlets_jsp.server.runtime.client.HttpServletRequestFacade@2cbd9a10, com.sap.engine.services.servlets_jsp.server.runtime.client.HttpServletResponseFacade@5db3e73e, cglogon#
#1.5 #0018FE8C6FD8007200003783000041C100045B07FD435510#1225989778319#com.sap.engine.services.security.policyconfiguration#sap.com/irj#com.sap.engine.services.security.policyconfiguration#kcf#3929##castoldi_EPX_176065950#KCF#a839a030ac2111ddb3dd0018fe8c6fd8#SAPEngine_Application_Thread[impl:3]_35##0#0#Debug##Java###Security context [{0}] successfully loaded from cache.#1#form#
#1.5 #0018FE8C6FD8007200003784000041C100045B07FD43559B#1225989778319#com.sap.engine.services.security.policyconfiguration#sap.com/irj#com.sap.engine.services.security.policyconfiguration#kcf#3929##castoldi_EPX_176065950#KCF#a839a030ac2111ddb3dd0018fe8c6fd8#SAPEngine_Application_Thread[impl:3]_35##0#0#Path##Plain###Entering PolicyConfigurationSecurityContext.getAuthenticationContext()#
#1.5 #0018FE8C6FD8007200003785000041C100045B07FD43560F#1225989778319#com.sap.engine.services.security.policyconfiguration#sap.com/irj#com.sap.engine.services.security.policyconfiguration#kcf#3929##castoldi_EPX_176065950#KCF#a839a030ac2111ddb3dd0018fe8c6fd8#SAPEngine_Application_Thread[impl:3]_35##0#0#Path##Plain###Exiting PolicyConfigurationSecurityContext.getAuthenticationContext()#
#1.5 #0018FE8C6FD8007200003786000041C100045B07FD435864#1225989778320#com.sap.engine.services.security.policyconfiguration#sap.com/irj#com.sap.engine.services.security.policyconfiguration#kcf#3929##castoldi_EPX_176065950#KCF#a839a030ac2111ddb3dd0018fe8c6fd8#SAPEngine_Application_Thread[impl:3]_35##0#0#Debug##Java###New policy configuration modification context successfully created for configuration with path [{0}].#1#security/configurations/form#
#1.5 #0018FE8C6FD8007200003787000041C100045B07FD4358F8#1225989778320#com.sap.engine.services.security.policyconfiguration#sap.com/irj#com.sap.engine.services.security.policyconfiguration#kcf#3929##castoldi_EPX_176065950#KCF#a839a030ac2111ddb3dd0018fe8c6fd8#SAPEngine_Application_Thread[impl:3]_35##0#0#Path##Plain###Entering Storage.getStorage(Configuration config)#
#1.5 #0018FE8C6FD8007200003788000041C100045B07FD435983#1225989778320#com.sap.engine.services.security.policyconfiguration#sap.com/irj#com.sap.engine.services.security.policyconfiguration#kcf#3929##castoldi_EPX_176065950#KCF#a839a030ac2111ddb3dd0018fe8c6fd8#SAPEngine_Application_Thread[impl:3]_35##0#0#Debug##Java###New storage [{0}] created.#1#com.sap.engine.services.security.server.storage.AtomicStorage@3091c97c#
#1.5 #0018FE8C6FD8007200003789000041C100045B07FD435A00#1225989778320#com.sap.engine.services.security.policyconfiguration#sap.com/irj#com.sap.engine.services.security.policyconfiguration#kcf#3929##castoldi_EPX_176065950#KCF#a839a030ac2111ddb3dd0018fe8c6fd8#SAPEngine_Application_Thread[impl:3]_35##0#0#Path##Plain###Exiting Storage.getStorage(Configuration config)#
#1.5 #0018FE8C6FD800720000378A000041C100045B07FD435A7B#1225989778320#com.sap.engine.services.security.policyconfiguration#sap.com/irj#com.sap.engine.services.security.policyconfiguration#kcf#3929##castoldi_EPX_176065950#KCF#a839a030ac2111ddb3dd0018fe8c6fd8#SAPEngine_Application_Thread[impl:3]_35##0#0#Path##Plain###Entering Storage.begin()#
#1.5 #0018FE8C6FD800720000378B000041C100045B07FD435B31#1225989778321#com.sap.engine.services.security.policyconfiguration#sap.com/irj#com.sap.engine.services.security.policyconfiguration#kcf#3929##castoldi_EPX_176065950#KCF#a839a030ac2111ddb3dd0018fe8c6fd8#SAPEngine_Application_Thread[impl:3]_35##0#0#Debug##Java###New configuration handler [{0}] created.#1#com.sap.engine.core.configuration.impl.ConfigurationHandlerImpl@334304cd#
#1.5 #0018FE8C6FD800720000378C000041C100045B07FD435BC8#1225989778321#com.sap.engine.services.security.policyconfiguration#sap.com/irj#com.sap.engine.services.security.policyconfiguration#kcf#3929##castoldi_EPX_176065950#KCF#a839a030ac2111ddb3dd0018fe8c6fd8#SAPEngine_Application_Thread[impl:3]_35##0#0#Path##Plain###Exiting Storage.begin()#
#1.5 #0018FE8C6FD800720000378D000041C100045B07FD435C3A#1225989778321#com.sap.engine.services.security.policyconfiguration#sap.com/irj#com.sap.engine.services.security.policyconfiguration#kcf#3929##castoldi_EPX_176065950#KCF#a839a030ac2111ddb3dd0018fe8c6fd8#SAPEngine_Application_Thread[impl:3]_35##0#0#Debug##Plain###New modification bundle started for the current thread.#
#1.5 #0018FE8C6FD800720000378E000041C100045B07FD435CC6#1225989778321#com.sap.engine.services.security.policyconfiguration#sap.com/irj#com.sap.engine.services.security.policyconfiguration#kcf#3929##castoldi_EPX_176065950#KCF#a839a030ac2111ddb3dd0018fe8c6fd8#SAPEngine_Application_Thread[impl:3]_35##0#0#Debug##Java###Trying to get configuration [{0}] from storage; write access [{1}]; create if missing [{2}]#3#security/configurations/form/security/authentication#false#false#
#1.5 #0018FE8C6FD800720000378F000041C100045B07FD435DC0#1225989778321#com.sap.engine.services.security.policyconfiguration#sap.com/irj#com.sap.engine.services.security.policyconfiguration#kcf#3929##castoldi_EPX_176065950#KCF#a839a030ac2111ddb3dd0018fe8c6fd8#SAPEngine_Application_Thread[impl:3]_35##0#0#Debug##Java###Configuration returned from storage successfully [{0}].#1#security/configurations/form/security/authentication#
#1.5 #0018FE8C6FD8007200003790000041C100045B07FD436148#1225989778322#com.sap.engine.services.security.policyconfiguration#sap.com/irj#com.sap.engine.services.security.policyconfiguration#kcf#3929##castoldi_EPX_176065950#KCF#a839a030ac2111ddb3dd0018fe8c6fd8#SAPEngine_Application_Thread[impl:3]_35##0#0#Path##Plain###Entering Storage.forget()#
#1.5 #0018FE8C6FD8007200003791000041C100045B07FD436225#1225989778322#com.sap.engine.services.security.policyconfiguration#sap.com/irj#com.sap.engine.services.security.policyconfiguration#kcf#3929##castoldi_EPX_176065950#KCF#a839a030ac2111ddb3dd0018fe8c6fd8#SAPEngine_Application_Thread[impl:3]_35##0#0#Path##Plain###Exiting Storage.forget()#
#1.5 #0018FE8C6FD8007200003792000041C100045B07FD43629D#1225989778322#com.sap.engine.services.security.policyconfiguration#sap.com/irj#com.sap.engine.services.security.policyconfiguration#kcf#3929##castoldi_EPX_176065950#KCF#a839a030ac2111ddb3dd0018fe8c6fd8#SAPEngine_Application_Thread[impl:3]_35##0#0#Debug##Plain###Successful forget of modification bundle for the current thread.#
#1.5 #0018FE8C6FD8007200003793000041C100045B07FD4363B9#1225989778323#com.sap.engine.services.security.authentication.logincontext#sap.com/irj#com.sap.engine.services.security.authentication.logincontext#kcf#3929##castoldi_EPX_176065950#KCF#a839a030ac2111ddb3dd0018fe8c6fd8#SAPEngine_Application_Thread[impl:3]_35##0#0#Info##Plain###Re-authentication requested.#
#1.5 #0018FE8C6FD8007200003794000041C100045B07FD4364BA#1225989778323#com.sap.engine.services.security.policyconfiguration#sap.com/irj#com.sap.engine.services.security.policyconfiguration#kcf#3929##castoldi_EPX_176065950#KCF#a839a030ac2111ddb3dd0018fe8c6fd8#SAPEngine_Application_Thread[impl:3]_35##0#0#Debug##Java###Security context [{0}] successfully loaded from cache.#1#form#
#1.5 #0018FE8C6FD8007200003795000041C100045B07FD436534#1225989778323#com.sap.engine.services.security.policyconfiguration#sap.com/irj#com.sap.engine.services.security.policyconfiguration#kcf#3929##castoldi_EPX_176065950#KCF#a839a030ac2111ddb3dd0018fe8c6fd8#SAPEngine_Application_Thread[impl:3]_35##0#0#Path##Plain###Entering PolicyConfigurationSecurityContext.getAuthenticationContext()#
#1.5 #0018FE8C6FD8007200003796000041C100045B07FD4365A6#1225989778323#com.sap.engine.services.security.policyconfiguration#sap.com/irj#com.sap.engine.services.security.policyconfiguration#kcf#3929##castoldi_EPX_176065950#KCF#a839a030ac2111ddb3dd0018fe8c6fd8#SAPEngine_Application_Thread[impl:3]_35##0#0#Path##Plain###Exiting PolicyConfigurationSecurityContext.getAuthenticationContext()#
#1.5 #0018FE8C6FD8007200003797000041C100045B07FD439765#1225989778336#com.sap.engine.services.security.authentication.logincontext#sap.com/irj#com.sap.engine.services.security.authentication.logincontext#kcf#3929##castoldi_EPX_176065950#KCF#a839a030ac2111ddb3dd0018fe8c6fd8#SAPEngine_Application_Thread[impl:3]_35##0#0#Info##Java###User [{0}] attempt to re-authenticate.#1#kcf#
#1.5 #0018FE8C6FD8007200003798000041C100045B07FD439CA1#1225989778337#com.sap.engine.services.security.sessionmanagement#sap.com/irj#com.sap.engine.services.security.sessionmanagement#kcf#3929##castoldi_EPX_176065950#KCF#a839a030ac2111ddb3dd0018fe8c6fd8#SAPEngine_Application_Thread[impl:3]_35##0#0#Info##Java###Principal {0} assigned to {1}#2#kcf#[Security Session (3929) for kcf created at Thu Nov 06 08:40:44 PST 2008]#
#1.5 #0018FE8C6FD8007200003799000041C100045B07FD439D6C#1225989778338#com.sap.engine.services.security.sessionmanagement#sap.com/irj#com.sap.engine.services.security.sessionmanagement#kcf#3929##castoldi_EPX_176065950#KCF#a839a030ac2111ddb3dd0018fe8c6fd8#SAPEngine_Application_Thread[impl:3]_35##0#0#Info##Java###Subject {0} assigned to {1}#2#Subject:
 Principal: kcf
#[Security Session (3929) for kcf created at Thu Nov 06 08:40:44 PST 2008]#
#1.5 #0018FE8C6FD800720000379A000041C100045B07FD439DF3#1225989778338#com.sap.engine.services.security.authentication.logincontext#sap.com/irj#com.sap.engine.services.security.authentication.logincontext#kcf#3929##castoldi_EPX_176065950#KCF#a839a030ac2111ddb3dd0018fe8c6fd8#SAPEngine_Application_Thread[impl:3]_35##0#0#Info##Java###Re-authentication for user [{0}] successfull.#1#kcf#
#1.5 #0018FE8C6FD800720000379C000041C100045B07FD439F9B#1225989778338#com.sap.engine.services.security.authentication.logincontext#sap.com/irj#com.sap.engine.services.security.authentication.logincontext#kcf#3929##castoldi_EPX_176065950#KCF#a839a030ac2111ddb3dd0018fe8c6fd8#SAPEngine_Application_Thread[impl:3]_35##0#0#Info#1#/System/Security/Authentication#Plain###LOGIN.OK
User: kcf
Authentication Stack: form
Login Module Flag Initialize Login Commit Abort Details
1. mycompany.com.CGLoginModuleClass REQUISITE ok true true
Central Checks true #
#1.5 #0018FE8C6FD800720000379D000041C100045B07FD43A10D#1225989778338#com.sap.engine.services.security.authentication.programmatic#sap.com/irj#com.sap.engine.services.security.authentication.programmatic.logon#kcf#3929##castoldi_EPX_176065950#KCF#a839a030ac2111ddb3dd0018fe8c6fd8#SAPEngine_Application_Thread[impl:3]_35##0#0#Debug##Plain###Security session assigned successfully to the http session.#
#1.5 #0018FE8C6FD800720000379F000041C100045B07FD43CC17#1225989778349#com.sap.engine.services.security.authentication.programmatic#sap.com/irj#com.sap.engine.services.security.authentication.programmatic#kcf#3929##castoldi_EPX_176065950#KCF#a839a030ac2111ddb3dd0018fe8c6fd8#SAPEngine_Application_Thread[impl:3]_35##0#0#Path##Plain###Exiting logon with authenticated subject.#
#1.5 #0018FE8C6FD80072000037A0000041C100045B07FD43D9FE#1225989778353#com.sap.engine.services.security.authentication.programmatic#sap.com/irj#com.sap.engine.services.security.authentication.programmatic.isAuthenticated#kcf#3929##castoldi_EPX_176065950#KCF#a839a030ac2111ddb3dd0018fe8c6fd8#SAPEngine_Application_Thread[impl:3]_35##0#0#Path##Java###Entering method with ({0})#1#KCF#
#1.5 #0018FE8C6FD80072000037A1000041C100045B07FD43DAC6#1225989778353#com.sap.engine.services.security.authentication.programmatic#sap.com/irj#com.sap.engine.services.security.authentication.programmatic.isAuthenticated#kcf#3929##castoldi_EPX_176065950#KCF#a839a030ac2111ddb3dd0018fe8c6fd8#SAPEngine_Application_Thread[impl:3]_35##0#0#Path##Java###Exiting method with {0}#1#false#
#1.5 #0018FE8C6FD80072000037A2000041C100045B07FD440358#1225989778364#com.sap.engine.services.security.authentication.logonapplication#sap.com/irj#com.sap.engine.services.security.authentication.logonapplication.initBeans#kcf#3929##castoldi_EPX_176065950#KCF#a839a030ac2111ddb3dd0018fe8c6fd8#SAPEngine_Application_Thread[impl:3]_35##0#0#Info##Plain###LanguagesBean created#
#1.5 #0018FE8C6FD80072000037A3000041C100045B07FD44045E#1225989778364#com.sap.engine.services.security.authentication.logonapplication#sap.com/irj#com.sap.engine.services.security.authentication.logonapplication.executeRequest#kcf#3929##castoldi_EPX_176065950#KCF#a839a030ac2111ddb3dd0018fe8c6fd8#SAPEngine_Application_Thread[impl:3]_35##0#0#Info##Plain###No command found, forwarding to umLogonPage#
#1.5 #0018FE8C6FD80072000037A4000041C100045B07FD4429BF#1225989778373#com.sap.engine.services.security.sessionmanagement##com.sap.engine.services.security.sessionmanagement#kcf#3929##castoldi_EPX_176065950#KCF#a839a030ac2111ddb3dd0018fe8c6fd8#SAPEngine_Application_Thread[impl:3]_35##0#0#Path##Java###Entering SecurityContext.empty() on {0}#1#[Security Context : [Security Session (3929) for kcf created at Thu Nov 06 08:40:44 PST 2008]]#
#1.5 #0018FE8C6FD80072000037A5000041C100045B07FD442AC1#1225989778374#com.sap.engine.services.security.sessionmanagement##com.sap.engine.services.security.sessionmanagement#Guest#0##castoldi_EPX_176065950#KCF#a839a030ac2111ddb3dd0018fe8c6fd8#SAPEngine_Application_Thread[impl:3]_35##0#0#Debug##Java###Notifying persistent listener {0} of {1}#2#
User ID : kcf
Service Type : Web Request
Action Name : Appl.: irj:com.cg.ivu_saplogon_0
Action Type : http
Additional Info : null
CPU Time [us] : 0
Queue Time [us] : 4295152
No of ext. calls : 0
Edited by: K Ferguson on Nov 6, 2008 6:07 PM

I am facing the same problem.
And how was is solved ?
Thanks

Use labview command line custom

Hay,
This is the forst time i wanna try the command line tool for Labview. i want to use the command line to fill in a parameter. In the end i want to do this:
C:\hex.vi --5340020A0050 //the digits represent hex values
copy the hex values into a string(type hex string) and send this to my comport.
Can some one help me out? I did find something about property nodes but i have no idea how to use them.
Tnx

Note: You would actually have to build an application from your VI to get command-line arguments. If you open a VI into the development environment it's actually LabVIEW that would receive the command-line arguments, not your VI.

AirPort Utility mystery behavior

Is it normal or even possible for the AirPort Utility.app to launch by itself?
When I woke up this morning the app was open for no apparent reason. I know I didn't launch it since I haven't had cause to use it in a few months.
I have a WPA2 network but changed all my passwords anyway. This seemed odd.

Hey PVC. I am not sure if you are a Comcast customer or not, but I JUST had the exact same thing happen. They are releasing some sort of update or something and it total hosed my system for the last hour resulting in my Airport Utility to pop up .. freaking the heck out of me. But .. all seems well now.
Hope maybe that might help you out.

Assess finance charges on Customer statement - MYSTERY Un-Resolved

Hi all,
This is the 5th time I am requesting somebody to help me on displaying finance charges on customer's monthly statement. Can somebody pls guide me on the various t.codes to show finance charges (interest rate) levied on a customer's monthly financial statement.
Pls folks, help me with this. Its been more than a week I have been posing this question on this forum for which I haven't got any solution yet.
Thank you,
SONY
(Please do not worry of your reward, i will surely assign points for every kind of helpful answer)

Hi,
Follow the following steps
Financial Accounting> Accounts Receivable and Accounts Payable> Business Transactions> Interest Calculation
Interest Calculation Global Settings>
Define Interest Calculation Types
Give the Interest Indicator (your choice)
Select the interest cal. Type as Intem Interest Calculation
Define Number Ranges for Interest Forms
Define the number range here with internal numbering
Prepare Item Interest Calculation
New entries>
Check Open Items Check Box
Check radio buttons as required
Ref. Date-4
Calendar type-G
Factory Calendar ID-select your factory calander
Check box Post Interest
Save your entries
Define Reference Interest Rates
Ref.int.rate- Give the Code
Long text-
Date from- Effective Date of the interest
Currency
Save your entry
Define Time-Based Terms
Int.calc.indicator-Give your indicator
Currency Key
Eff. From- Date
Sequential number-1
Term-Credit interest: arrears interest calc.
Ref. interest rate- Give the ref. rate as defined above
Save your entries
Enter Interest Values
New Entries
Select your Reference as defined above
Enter the Interest Rate
Interest Posting
Create Symbols- Create symbol for interest received
Save your entry
Create- Posting Specifications Click on the create symbol
Business Transaction-1000
Enter the Debit and Credit Posting Key and the account symbol as created: Interest Receivd
Accounts
Chart of Accounts
Select Account Symbol for Interest Received
Currency-
GL Account- Give the Account for interest received-Revenue account
Your Configuration is complete here.
Now mention this interest indicator in your Customr account.

Urgent: Mysterious behavior in class instantiation

Hi
I have a Class A trying to instantiate a Class B , both of them being in the same jar. When a class C ( located in another jar) calls this method on Class A that instantiates B, execution seems to stop at that point. However there are no errors visible.
When i create an Instance of class A and call the same method that instantiates B in a Junit test, it works fine.
I am using jboss and have put the jars in the default/lib folder.
Any insights into this would be highly appreciated.
Thanks
-DD

The key words are "seems" and "visible." If execution really does stop there, then it's almost certainly because there was a Throwable. If this is the case, then the problem is the visibility of the error. The other likely possibility is that execution does not actually stop there, and you are misunderstanding what's happening. In ether case, you need more output statements around the area of the problem to find out what's going on.

Help needed: custom text click behavior

Hi,
When a section of text in Flex's TextArea formatted with a
URL through a TextFormat object is clicked, an application will try
to go to the URL. In one of my applications, I need to customize
this to have a Flex window popped up etc.. Is there a way to do
this? Does anyone know if the source code of Flex 3 is available
somewhere for reference?
Thanks in advance!

This sample code shows opening a link in a new window using
navigateToURL(new URLRequest(event.text), '_blank'):
<?xml version="1.0"?>

<mx:Application xmlns:mx="
http://www.adobe.com/2006/mxml"
borderStyle="solid"
backgroundGradientColors="[#FFFFFF, #FFFFFF]">
<mx:Script>
<![CDATA[
import flash.events.TextEvent;
public function linkHandler(event:TextEvent):void {
myTA.text="link occured.";
// Open the link in a new window.
navigateToURL(new URLRequest(event.text), '_blank')
]]>
</mx:Script>
<mx:Label selectable="true"
link="linkHandler(event);">
<mx:htmlText><![CDATA[<a href='event:
http://www.adobe.com'>Adobe</a>
</mx:Label>
<mx:TextArea id="myTA"/>
</mx:Application>

Lombard mysterious behavior

The bronze powerbook (400 MHZ) that I just bought looks great but it is acting very flaky. It took a long time to start up so I reset the PMU. It still seemed kind of slow for me so I checked with the disk utility and it checked out, but took a long time to read throught the catalog file I thought. So I tried to boot with Disk Warrior and it won't boot into it now. Since I set DW as the Startup Disk, it just hangs at the happy Mac. So right now, DW is still in the machine but I am stuck. It's running OS 9 so I just wanted to make sure it was running right before I upgraded the system. So that's where it's at. Any ideas?
Thanks.

Denison,
Desktop and Finder performance is slower, less "snappy", in OSX than 9.x. And as you state, a 400Mhz G3 with a 66MHz system bus is no speed demon. You install OSX on these older machines for compatibility with other OSX computers, modern software, and the multiple features OSX has; speed is doesn't enter the equation.
Be sure to check which microprocessor you have. I posted this is an earlier thread:
"Some Lombards can have a problem with any version of OSX if you have memory in the top memory slot. (You have two memory slots...one on the bottom side of the microprocessor card and one on the top.) So before going any further, download 'PPC Checker' here:
http://www.xlr8yourmac.com/G3CARDS/PPCchecker/
Then see if it gives this report:
PowerPC 750L (LoneStar, Rev2.2) Copper G3 PVR = 0x00088202
If you have this CPU, you can only run a maximum of 256MB of RAM in the bottom memory slot."
If this is the case, remove the top memory module and see how it runs.

Custom / default probe LV 8.2

Hi All,
I have recently created myself a custom probe by right clicking on a string, creating a new probe giving it a name and saving it under the Labview/probes directory. However when i right click a string and select probe (I am wanting the default small box probe) i instead get my custom one automatically. I want access to the default one all the time but instead keep getting my custom one! Surely if i want my custom one i shall select probe->custom probes->mycustomProbe. Does anyone know how to undo this?
Thanks in advance
Craig
LabVIEW 2012
Solved!
Go to Solution.

Ahhh Wonderfull,
As you said, select generic probe, then you get the last probe used as default
Thanks Mike
LabVIEW 2012

LabVIEW 8.2 - Custom Probe mystery behavior

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for