Large File Support

Hi all,
I'm new to the fourms but not new to the products. Recently
I've been working on a project that requires very large XML files,
like over 200,000 lines of code. I have noticed that when I work on
these large files the software is really buggy. First I can't use
the scroll wheel on my mouse. It just doesn't work. Second, half
the time when I open a file it will trunkate the code after a few
hundred thousand lines. I don't think it should do this. Visual
Studio sure doesn't. I would rather work with dreamweaver, but
because of these problems on large files I am forced to use Visual
Studio. So, here's the question, Is there something I should do to
make dreamweaver work with large files or is this something that
Adobe needs to fix?
Thanks for the replys.

man mount_ufs
-o largefiles | nolargefiles

Similar Messages

(urgent) SQL*Loader Large file support in O734

hi there,
i have the following sqlloader error when trying to upload data file(s),
each has size 10G - 20G to Oracle 734 DB on SunOS 5.6 .
>>
SQL*Loader-500: Unable to open file (..... /tstt.dat)
SVR4 Error: 79: Value too large for defined data type
<<
i know there's bug fix for large file support in Oracle 8 -
>>
Oracle supports files over 2GB for the oracle executable.
Contact Worldwide Support for information about fixes for bug 508304,
which will add large file support for imp, exp, and sqlldr
<<
however, really want to know if any fix for Oracle 734 ?
thx.

Example
Control file
C:\DOCUME~1\MAMOHI~1>type dept.ctl
load data
infile dept.dat
into table dept
append
fields terminated by ',' optionally enclosed by '"'
trailing nullcols
(deptno integer external,
dname char,
loc char)
Data file
C:\DOCUME~1\MAMOHI~1>type dept.dat
50,IT,VIKARABAD
60,INVENTORY,NIZAMABAD
C:\DOCUME~1\MAMOHI~1>
C:\DOCUME~1\MAMOHI~1>dir dept.*
Volume in drive C has no label.
Volume Serial Number is 9CCC-A1AF
Directory of C:\DOCUME~1\MAMOHI~1
09/21/2006 08:33 AM               177 dept.ctl
04/05/2007 12:17 PM                41 dept.dat
               2 File(s)          8,043 bytes
               0 Dir(s)   1,165 bytes free
Intelligent sqlldr command
C:\DOCUME~1\MAMOHI~1>sqlldr userid=hary/hary control=dept.ctl
SQL*Loader: Release 10.2.0.1.0 - Production on Thu Apr 5 12:18:26 2007
Copyright (c) 1982, 2005, Oracle. All rights reserved.
Commit point reached - logical record count 2
C:\DOCUME~1\MAMOHI~1>sqlplus hary/hary
SQL*Plus: Release 10.2.0.1.0 - Production on Thu Apr 5 12:18:37 2007
Copyright (c) 1982, 2005, Oracle. All rights reserved.
Connected to:
Oracle Database 10g Enterprise Edition Release 10.2.0.1.0 - Production
With the Partitioning, OLAP and Data Mining options
As I am appending I got two extra rows. One department in your district and another in my district :)
SQL> select * from dept;
    DEPTNO DNAME          LOC
        10 ACCOUNTING     NEW YORK
        20 RESEARCH       DALLAS
        30 SALES          CHICAGO
        40 OPERATIONS     BOSTON
        50 IT             VIKARABAD
        60 INVENTORY      NIZAMABAD
6 rows selected.
SQL>

Large File Support OEL 5.8 x86 64 bit

All,
I have downloaded some software from OTN and would like to combine the individual zip files into one large file. I assumed that I would unzip the individual files and then create a single zip file. However, my OEL zip utility fails with the file is too large error.
Perhaps related, I can't ls the directories that contain huge files. For example, a huge VM image file.
Do I need to rebuild the utilities to support huge files or do I need install/upgrade rpm's? If I need to relink lint programs, what are the commands to do such?
Thanks.

Correction: This is occurring on a 5.7 release and not a 5.8. The command uname -a yields 2.6.32-200.13.1.2...
The file size I'm trying to assemble is ~ 4 GB (the zip files for 12c DB). As for using tar, as I understand it, EM 12c wants a single zip file for software deployments.
I'm assuming that the large file support was not linked into the utilities. For example when I try to list contents of a directory which has huge/large files, I get the following message:
ls: V29653-01.iso: Value too large for defined data type
I'm assuming that I need to upgrade to later release.
Thanks.

IdcApache2Auth.so Compiled With Large File Support

Hi, I'm installing UCM 10g on solaris 64 Bit plattform and Apache 2.0.63 , everything went fine until I update configuration in the httpd.conf file. When I query server status it seems to be ok:
+./idcserver_query+
Success checking Content Server idc status. Status: Running
but in the apache error_log and I found the next error description:
Content Server Apache filter detected a bad request_rec structure. This is possibly a problem with LFS (large file support). Bad request_rec: uri=NULL;
Sizing information:
sizeof(*r): 392
+[int]sizeof(r->chunked): 4+
+[apr_off_t]sizeof(r->clength): 4+
+[unsigned]sizeof(r->expecting_100): 4+
If the above size for r->clength is equal to 4, then this module
was compiled without LFS, which is the default on Apache 1.3 and 2.0.
Most likely, Apache was compiled with LFS, this has been seen with some
stock builds of Apache. Please contact Support to obtain an alternate
build of this module.
When I search at My Oracle Support for suggestions about how to solve my problem I found a thread which basically says that Oracle ECM support team could give me a copy IdcApache2Auth.so compiled with LFS.
What do you suggest me?
Should I ask for ECM support team help? (If yes please tell me How can I do it)
or should I update the apache web server to version 2.2 and use IdcApache22Auth.so wich is compiled with LFS?
Thanks in advance, I hope you can help me.

Hi ,
Easiest approach would be to use Apache2.2 and the corresponding IdcApache22Auth.so file .
Thanks
Srinath

Mounting CIFS on MAC with large file support

Dear All,
We are having issues copying large files ( > 3.5 GB) from MAC to a CIFS Share (smb mounted on MAC) whereby the copy fails if files are larger than 3.5 GB in size and hence I was wondering if there is any special way to mount CIFS Shares (special option in the mount_smbfs command perhaps ) to support large file transfer?
Currently we mount the share using the command below
mount_smbfs //user@server/<share> /destinationdir_onMAC

If you haven't already, I would suggest trying an evaluation of DAVE from Thursby Software. The eval is free, fully functional, and supported.
DAVE is able to handle large file transfer without interruption or data loss when connecting to WIndows shared folders. If it turns out that it doesn't work as well as you like, you can easily remove it with the uninstaller.
(And yes, I work for Thursby, and have supported DAVE since 1998)

[REQ] gpac with Large File Support (solved)

Hi All
I´m getting desperated.
I´m using mp4box from the gpac package to mux x264 and aac into mp4 containers.
Unfortunately all mp4box version don´t support files bigger then 2Gb.
There is already a discussion going on at the bugtracker
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.ph … tid=571738
I tried all those methods with gpac 4.4 and the csv version.
But it still breaks up after 2Gb when importing files with mp4box.
So..anybody an idea how to get a version build on arch which supports big files?
thanks
Last edited by mic64 (2007-07-16 17:16:44)

ok after looking at this tuff with patience I got it working.
You have to use the cvs version AND the patch AND extra flags from the link above.
After that Files >2Gb work.
Last edited by mic64 (2007-07-16 17:27:33)

Apache 2.0.x and large file support (bigger than 2GB)

I've seen on the mail list people complaining that apache 2.0.55 can't serve files bigger than 2GB.
The sollution is to compile with this option:
export CPPFLAGS="-D_LARGEFILE_SOURCE -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64"
(and this is default in 2.2.x)
Now, an Apache compiled with those options is most probably not binary compatible with mod_php or mod_python or other out-of-tree apache modules, so they'll need recompileing too.
Now, I've noticed that /home/httpd/build/config_vars.mk needs to be patched too, so that the php and python modules pick up the setting when compiled.
You need to find the EXTRA_CPPFLAGS variable and add the two defines from above to it.. At the end it should look something like this:
EXTRA_CPPFLAGS = -DLINUX=2 -D_REENTRANT -D_XOPEN_SOURCE=500 -D_BSD_SOURCE -D_SVID_SOURCE -D_GNU_SOURCE -D_LARGEFILE_SOURCE -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64
BTW in lighttpd (well at least in 1.4.11) the --enable-lfs is enabled by default.

I've seen on the mail list people complaining that apache 2.0.55 can't serve files bigger than 2GB.
The sollution is to compile with this option:
export CPPFLAGS="-D_LARGEFILE_SOURCE -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64"
(and this is default in 2.2.x)
Now, an Apache compiled with those options is most probably not binary compatible with mod_php or mod_python or other out-of-tree apache modules, so they'll need recompileing too.
Now, I've noticed that /home/httpd/build/config_vars.mk needs to be patched too, so that the php and python modules pick up the setting when compiled.
You need to find the EXTRA_CPPFLAGS variable and add the two defines from above to it.. At the end it should look something like this:
EXTRA_CPPFLAGS = -DLINUX=2 -D_REENTRANT -D_XOPEN_SOURCE=500 -D_BSD_SOURCE -D_SVID_SOURCE -D_GNU_SOURCE -D_LARGEFILE_SOURCE -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64
BTW in lighttpd (well at least in 1.4.11) the --enable-lfs is enabled by default.

Can't Upload Large Files (Upload Fails using Internet Explorer but works with Google Chrome)

I've been experience an issue uploading large (75MB & greater) PDF files to a SharePoint 2010 document library. Using normal upload procedures using Internet Explorer 7 (our company standard for the time being) the upload fails. No error message is thrown,
the upload screen goes away and the page refreshes and the document isn't there. I tried upload multiple and it says throws a failed error after a while.
Using google chrome I made an attempt just to see what it did and the file using the "Add a document" uploaded in seconds. Can't figure out why one browser worked and the other doesn't. We are getting sporadic inquiries with the same issue.
We have previously setup large file support in the appropriate areas and large files are uploaded to the sites successfully. Any thoughts?

File size upload has to be configured on the server farm level. Your administrator most likely set
up the limit to size of files that can be uploaded. This size can be increased and you would then be able to upload your documents.

Need PDF Information for large files

Hi experts,
I need some information from you regarding PDF related.
is there any newer adobe version for large files support - over 15mb, over 30 pages.
is it possible Batch technology with PDF
if not please suggest me Possible adobe replacements.
Thanks
Kishore

Thanks so long.
acroread renders the pages very fast. That's what i want - but it's proprietary:/
For the moment it's ok but i'd like to have a free alternative to acroread that shows the pages as quick as acroread or preloads more than 1 page.
lucke wrote:Perhaps, just perhaps it'd work better if you copied it to tmpfs and read from there?
I've tried it: no improvement.
Edit: tried Sumatra: an improvement compared to Okular etc. Thanks.
Last edited by oneway (2009-05-12 21:50:10)

Does SAP XI (PI 7.0) support streaming to support large file/Idoc

Does SAP XI (PI 7.0) support streaming to support large file/Idoc/Message Structure transfers?

AFAIK, that is possible with flat files, when you use File Content Conversion.
Check this blog: /people/sravya.talanki2/blog/2005/11/29/night-mare-processing-huge-files-in-sap-xi
Regards,
Henrique.

Large waveform file support?

I have read a great deal recently on how to write/read large files in LV. Unless I am missing something, there doesn't seem to be a clean "native" LV implementation of large file i/o? OpenG has some vis that do the trick for Write/Read Bytes to/from File, but I need to find a way of Writing/Reading Arrays of Waveforms to/from a file of perhaps up to 50 GB. Currently, even though the record number input on the Read WF from File vi is an I32 (leading me to think I can have a really large number of records!) there appears to be the same 2 GB limit as other native LV file i/o vis. Has anyone solved this issue (writing and reading arrays of WF to "large" files)?

Managing large data sets in LabVIEW has been othen discussed in Info-LabVIEW, but I think this NI-link could help too:
http://zone.ni.com/devzone/conceptd.nsf/webmain/6A56C174EABA7BBD86256E58005D9712?opendocument

BT Cloud - large file ( ~95MB) uploads failing

I am consistently getting upload failures for any files over approximately 95MB in size. This happens with both the Web interface, and the PC client.
With the Web interface the file upload gets to a percentage that would be around the 95MB amount, then fails showing a red icon with a exclamation mark.
With the PC client the file gets to the same percentage equating to approximately 95MB, then resets to 0%, and repeats this continuously. I left my PC running 24/7 for 5 days, and this resulted in around 60GB of upload bandwidth being used just trying to upload a single 100MB file.
I've verified this on two PCs (Win XP, SP3), one laptop (Win 7, 64 bit), and also my work PC (Win 7, 64 bit). I've also verified it with multiple different types and sizes of files. Everything from 1KB to ~95MB upload perfectly, but anything above this size ( I've tried 100MB, 120MB, 180MB, 250MB, 400MB) fails every time.
I've completely uninstalled the PC Client, done a Windows "roll-back", reinstalled, but this has had no effect. I also tried completely wiping the cloud account (deleting all files and disconnecting all devices), and starting from scratch a couple of times, but no improvement.
I phoned technical support yesterday and had a BT support rep remote control my PC, but he was completely unfamiliar with the application and after fumbling around for over two hours, he had no suggestion other than trying to wait for longer to see if the failure would clear itself !!!!!
Basically I suspect my Cloud account is just corrupted in some way and needs to be deleted and recreated from scratch by BT. However I'm not sure how to get them to do this as calling technical support was futile.
Any suggestions?
Thanks,
Elinor.
Solved!
Go to Solution.

Hi,
I too have been having problems uploading a large file (362Mb) for many weeks now and as this topic is marked as SOLVED I wanted to let BT know that it isn't solved for me.
All I want to do is share a video with a friend and thought that BT cloud would be perfect! Oh, if only that were the case :-(
I first tried web upload (as I didn't want to use the PC client's Backup facility) - it failed.
I then tried the PC client Backup.... after about 4 hrs of "progress" it reached 100% and an icon appeared. I selected it and tried to Share it by email, only to have the share fail and no link. Cloud backup thinks it's there but there are no files in my Cloud storage!
I too spent a long time on the phone to Cloud support during which the tech took over my PC. When he began trying to do completely inappropriate and irrelevant things such as cleaning up my temporary internet files and cookies I stopped him.
We did together successfully upload a small file and sharing that was successful - trouble is, it's not that file I want to share!
Finally he said he would escalate the problem to next level of support.
After a couple of weeks of hearing nothing, I called again and went through the same farce again with a different tech. After which he assured me it was already escalated. I demanded that someone give me some kind of update on the problem and he assured me I would hear from BT within a week. I did - they rang to ask if the problem was fixed! Needless to say it isn't.
A couple of weeks later now and I've still heard nothing and it still doesn't work.
Why can't Cloud support at least send me an email to let me know they exist and are working on this problem.
I despair of ever being able to share this file with BT Cloud.
C'mon BT Cloud surely you can do it - many other organisations can!

Can you share large files on iCloud drive like dropbox?

I am exploring how to use iCloud drive now...and had a basic question. Can you share large files from it in a similar way as you can with dropbox? This is a great feature of dropbox...or google drive when mailing large files just doesn't work.
I have a Yosemite beta currently, and it doesn't look like you can do this.
I also was wondering if anyone has figured out how to make an alias of the iCloud drive on the desktop rather than always opening a finder window in order to drop files into iCloud drive....
Yosemite Beta and Mavericks, iMac 2012/Mac Pro/Mac book air

I am exploring how to use iCloud drive now...and had a basic question. Can you share large files from it in a similar way as you can with dropbox?
Have a look at the iCloud Drive FAQ: The file size limit is 15 G: iCloud Drive FAQ http://support.apple.com/kb/HT201104
You can store any type of file in iCloud Drive, as long as it's less than 15 GB in size. There's no restriction on file type, so you keep all of your work documents, school projects, presentations, and more up to date across all of your devices. Learn more about managing your iCloud Drive files.
If you make an alias to a folder on iCloud Drive, you can drag it to the Favourites in the Finder sidebar. That is the best I could do.

Windows Explorer misreads large-file .zip archives

   I just spent about 90 minutes trying to report this problem through
the normal support channels with no useful result, so, in desperation,
I'm trying here, in the hope that someone can direct this report to some
useful place.
   There appears to be a bug in the .zip archive reader used by Windows
Explorer in Windows 7 (and up, most likely).
   An Info-ZIP Zip user recently reported a problem with an archive
created using our Zip program. The archive was valid, but it contained
a file which was larger than 4GiB. The complaint was that Windows
Explorer displayed (and, apparently believed) an absurdly large size
value for this large-file archive member. We have since reproduced the
problem.
   The original .zip archive format includes uncompressed and compressed
sizes for archive members (files), and these sizes were stored in 32-bit
fields. This caused problems for files which are larger than 4GiB (or,
on some system types, where signed size values were used, 2GiB). The
solution to this fundamental limitation was to extend the .zip archive
format to allow storage of 64-bit member sizes, when necessary. (PKWARE
identifies this format extension as "Zip64".)
   The .zip archive format includes a mechanism, the "Extra Field", for
storing various kinds of metadata which had no place in the normal
archive file headers. Examples include OS-specific file-attribute data,
such as Finder info and extended attributes for Apple Macintosh; record
format, record size, and record type data for VMS/OpenVMS; universal
file times and/or UID/GID for UNIX(-like) systems; and so on. The Extra
Field is where the 64-bit member sizes are stored, when the fixed 32-bit
size fields are too small.
   An Extra Field has a structure which allows multiple types of extra
data to be included. It comprises one or more "Extra Blocks", each of
which has the following structure:
       Size (bytes) | Description
      --------------+------------
            2       | Type code
            2       | Number of data bytes to follow
        (variable) | Extra block data
   The problem with the .zip archive reader used by Windows Explorer is
that it appears to expect the Extra Block which includes the 64-bit
member sizes (type code = 0x0001) to be the first (or only) Extra Block
in the Extra Field. If some other Extra Block appears at the start of
the Extra Field, then its (non-size) data are being incorrectly
interpreted as the 64-bit sizes, while the actual 64-bit size data,
further along in the Extra Field, are ignored.
   Perhaps the .zip archive _writer_ used by Windows Explorer always
places the Extra Block with the 64-bit sizes in this special location,
but the .zip specification does not demand any particular order or
placement of Extra Blocks in the Extra Field, and other programs
(Info-ZIP Zip, for example) should not be expected to abide by this
artificial restriction. For details, see section "4.5 Extensible data
fields" in the PKWARE APPNOTE:
      http://www.pkware.com/documents/casestudies/APPNOTE.TXT
   A .zip archive reader is expected to consider the Extra Block type
codes, and interpret accordingly the data which follow. In particular,
it's not sufficient to trust that any particular Extra Block will be the
first one in the Extra Field. It's generally safe to ignore any Extra
Block whose type code is not recognized, but it's crucial to scan the
Extra Field, identify each Extra Block, and handle it according to its
type.
   Here are some relatively small (about 14MiB each) test archives which
illustrate the problem:
      http://antinode.info/ftp/info-zip/ms_zip64/test_4g.zip
      http://antinode.info/ftp/info-zip/ms_zip64/test_4g_V.zip
      http://antinode.info/ftp/info-zip/ms_zip64/test_4g_W.zip
   Correct info, from UnZip 6.00 ("unzip -lv"):
Archive: test_4g.zip
Length   Method    Size Cmpr    Date    Time   CRC-32   Name
4362076160 Defl:X 14800839 100% 05-01-2014 15:33 6d8d2ece test_4g.txt
Archive: test_4g_V.zip
Length   Method    Size Cmpr    Date    Time   CRC-32   Name
4362076160 Defl:X 14800839 100% 05-01-2014 15:33 6d8d2ece test_4g.txt
Archive: test_4g_W.zip
Length   Method    Size Cmpr    Date    Time   CRC-32   Name
4362076160 Defl:X 14800839 100% 05-01-2014 15:33 6d8d2ece test_4g.txt
(In these reports, "Length" is the uncompressed size; "Size" is the
compressed size.)
   Incorrect info, from (Windows 7) Windows Explorer:
Archive        Name          Compressed size   Size
test_4g.zip    test_4g.txt         14,454 KB   562,951,376,907,238 KB
test_4g_V.zip test_4g.txt         14,454 KB   8,796,110,221,518 KB
test_4g_W.zip test_4g.txt         14,454 KB   1,464,940,363,777 KB
   Faced with these unrealistic sizes, Windows Explorer refuses to
extract the member file, for lack of (petabytes of) free disk space.
   The archive test_4g.zip has the following Extra Blocks: universal
time (type = 0x5455) and 64-bit sizes (type = 0x0001). test_4g_V.zip
has: PWWARE VMS (type = 0x000c) and 64-bit sizes (type = 0x0001).
test_4g_W.zip has: NT security descriptor (type = 0x4453), universal
time (type = 0x5455), and 64-bit sizes (type = 0x0001). Obviously,
Info-ZIP UnZip has no trouble correctly finding the 64-bit size info in
these archives, but Windows Explorer is clearly confused. (Note that
"1,464,940,363,777 KB" translates to 0x0005545500000400 (bytes), and
"0x00055455" looks exactly like the size, "0x0005" and the type code
"0x5455" for a "UT" universal time Extra Block, which was present in
that archive. This is consistent with the hypothesis that the wrong
data in the Extra Field are being interpreted as the 64-bit size data.)
   Without being able to see the source code involved here, it's hard to
know exactly what it's doing wrong, but it does appear that the .zip
reader used by Windows Explorer is using a very (too) simple-minded
method to extract 64-bit size data from the Extra Field, causing it to
get bad data from a properly formed archive.
   I suspect that the engineer involved will have little trouble finding
and fixing the code which parses an Extra Field to extract the 64-bit
sizes correctly, but if anyone has any questions, we'd be happy to help.
   For the Info-ZIP (http://info-zip.org/) team,
   Steven Schweda

> We can't get the source (info-zip) program for test.
   I don't know why you would need to, but yes, you can:
      http://www.info-zip.org/
      ftp://ftp.info-zip.org/pub/infozip/src/
You can also get pre-built executables for Windows:
      ftp://ftp.info-zip.org/pub/infozip/win32/unz600xn.exe
      ftp://ftp.info-zip.org/pub/infozip/win32/zip300xn.zip
> In addition, since other zip application runs correctly. Since it should
> be your software itself issue.
   You seem to misunderstand the situation. The facts are these:
   1. For your convenience, I've provided three test archives, each of
which includes a file larger than 4GiB. These archives are valid.
   2. Info-ZIP UnZip (version 6.00 or newer) can process these archives
correctly. This is consistent with the fact that these archives are
valid.
   3. Programs from other vendors can process these archives correctly.
I've supplied a screenshot showing one of them (7-Zip) doing so, as you
requested. This is consistent with the fact that these archives are
valid.
   4. Windows Explorer (on Windows 7) cannot process these archives
correctly, apparently because it misreads the (Zip64) file size data.
I've supplied a screenshot of Windows Explorer showing the bad file size
it gets, and the failure that occurs when one tries to use it to extract
the file from one of these archives, as you requested. This is
consistent with the fact that there's a bug in the .zip reader used by
Windows Explorer.
   Yes, "other zip application runs correctly." Info-ZIP UnZip runs
correctly. Only Windows Explorer does _not_ run correctly.

Printing problem with ads on as java when printing large files

hi all
we have an wd for java application running on as java 7.0 sp18 and adobe document service if we print
small files everything works fine with large files it fails with the following error (after arround 2 minutes)
any ideas
#1.5^H#869A6C5E590200710000092C000B20D000046E16922042E2#1246943126766#com.sap.engine.services.servlets_js
p.server.HttpHandlerImpl#sap.com/tcwddispwda#com.sap.engine.services.servlets_jsp.server.HttpHandlerImp
l#KRATHHO#8929##sabad19023_CHP_5307351#KRATHHO#63a60b106ab311de9cb4869a6c5e5902#SAPEngine_Application_Thr
ead[impl:3]_15##0#0#Error#1#/System/Server/WebRequests#Plain###application [webdynpro/dispatcher] Process
ing HTTP request to servlet [dispatcher] finished with error.^M
The error is: com.sap.tc.webdynpro.clientserver.adobe.pdfdocument.base.core.PDFDocumentRuntimeException:
Failed to UPDATEDATAINPDF^M
Exception id: [869A6C5E590200710000092A000B20D000046E1692201472]#

Hello
on which support package level is the java stack ?
kr,
andreas

Large File Support

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for