Large pool size

Hi, how to resolve the problem ORA-04031 my SGA is
504439252
455124
478150656
25165824
667648
java_pool_size 159383552
large_pool_size 16777216
shared_pool_reserved_size 10485760
shared_pool_size 209715200
This problem occurred when export full the DB

hi froylan,
this is the portal content management forum. for your database question please use the database forums:
http://forums.oracle.com/forums/index.jsp?cat=18
thanks,
christian

Similar Messages

Issue with shared pool size while upgrading from 10.2.0.4 to 11.2.0.2

Hi Team,
Below is my issue
I am running dbua as part of the upgrade from 10.2.0.4 to 11.2.0.2. Its almost 59% and nothing is happening on the instance. The logs directory contian the below
-bash-3.00$ ls -ltr
total 280
-rw-r----- 1 ora8014 ems8014 3662 Oct 16 08:58 upgrade.xml
-rw-r----- 1 ora8014 ems8014 1127 Oct 16 09:00 Upgrade_Directive.log
-rw-r----- 1 ora8014 ems8014 7452 Oct 16 09:00 mapfile.txt
-rw-r----- 1 ora8014 ems8014 297 Oct 16 09:04 SpaceUsage.txt
-rw-r----- 1 ora8014 ems8014 9803 Oct 16 09:04 PreUpgradeResults.html
-rw-r----- 1 ora8014 ems8014 1572 Oct 16 09:06 PreUpgrade.log
-rw-r----- 1 ora8014 ems8014 2850 Oct 16 09:06 Oracle_Text.log
-rw-r----- 1 ora8014 ems8014 157816 Oct 16 09:09 trace.log
-rw-r----- 1 ora8014 ems8014 71368 Oct 16 09:09 sqls.log
-rw-r----- 1 ora8014 ems8014 339 Oct 16 09:09 Oracle_Server.log
-bash-3.00$ date
Sat Oct 16 22:54:27 PDT 2010
-bash-3.00$ pwd
/slot/ems8014/oracle/app/ora8014/cfgtoollogs/dbua/ebs11i10/upgrade1
It seems its almost more 12 hrs nothing has happened. When I check the oracle_server.log it has the error
-bash-3.00$ tail Oracle_Server.log
ERROR at line 1:
ORA-01034: ORACLE not available
Process ID: 0
select count(*) from v$instance
ERROR at line 1:
ORA-01034: ORACLE not available
Process ID: 0
ORA-00371: not enough shared pool memory, should be atleast 424463564 bytes
Hence I started the Db in 10g oracle home to check and below is the details.
SQL> select * from V$SGAINFO;
NAME BYTES RES
Fixed SGA Size 1267908 No
Redo Buffers 11313152 No
Buffer Cache Size 614400000 Yes
Shared Pool Size 301989888 Yes
Large Pool Size 8388608 Yes
Java Pool Size 67108864 Yes
Streams Pool Size 50331648 Yes
Granule Size 4194304 No
Maximum SGA Size 1056964608 No
Startup overhead in Shared Pool 188743680 No
Free SGA Memory Available 0
11 rows selected.
I tried to increase the space of shared pool as below
SQL> ALTER SYSTEM SET shared_pool_size ='301M' SCOPE=MEMORY SID='ebs11i10';
ALTER SYSTEM SET shared_pool_size ='301M' SCOPE=MEMORY SID='ebs11i10'
ERROR at line 1:
ORA-02097: parameter cannot be modified because specified value is invalid
ORA-04033: Insufficient memory to grow pool
I am stuck and cant proceed further. Could you please help me on this issue so that I overcome this and proceed further.
Thanks
Shyam.

These are the logs. Could you please let me know which one you want.
-bash-3.00$ pwd
/slot/ems8014/oracle/app/ora8014/cfgtoollogs/dbua/ebs11i10/upgrade1
-bash-3.00$ ls -ltr
total 280
-rw-r----- 1 ora8014 ems8014 3662 Oct 16 08:58 upgrade.xml
-rw-r----- 1 ora8014 ems8014 1127 Oct 16 09:00 Upgrade_Directive.log
-rw-r----- 1 ora8014 ems8014 7452 Oct 16 09:00 mapfile.txt
-rw-r----- 1 ora8014 ems8014 297 Oct 16 09:04 SpaceUsage.txt
-rw-r----- 1 ora8014 ems8014 9803 Oct 16 09:04 PreUpgradeResults.html
-rw-r----- 1 ora8014 ems8014 1572 Oct 16 09:06 PreUpgrade.log
-rw-r----- 1 ora8014 ems8014 2850 Oct 16 09:06 Oracle_Text.log
-rw-r----- 1 ora8014 ems8014 157816 Oct 16 09:09 trace.log
-rw-r----- 1 ora8014 ems8014 71368 Oct 16 09:09 sqls.log
-rw-r----- 1 ora8014 ems8014 339 Oct 16 09:09 Oracle_Server.log

LARGE POOL의 개념 및 사용 방법

제품 : ORACLE SERVER
작성날짜 : 2004-05-03
LARGE POOL의 개념 및 사용 방법
1. 개념 및 사용 목적
Oracle8.0에서 large pool이라는 새로운 SGA 내의 구성이 도입되었다. large pool
이란 shared pool과 유사하나 실제 shared pool 내의 일부분을 사용하는 것은
아니고 SGA 내에 직접 할당하며, 이 pool을 사용할 수 있는 작업들을 제한하고 있다.
Oracle8에서 large pool을 사용하는 주요 목적은 다음과 같이 두가지로 볼 수 있다.
- MTS connection에서 session 정보, 즉 UGA를 할당하기 위해서
- sequential file IO의 buffering을 위해서
(예를 들어, multiple I/O slave를 사용하는 경우의 recovery)
MTS connection이 large pool을 사용하는 경우, 일단 fixed UGA라고 하는 부분은
shared large pool을 사용하고, 나머지 session memory(UGA)는 large pool에
할당된다. 만약 large pool이 충분하지 않으면 ORA-4031이 발생한다.
2. 사용 방법
large pool을 지정하기 위해서는 init.ora file 내에 large_pool_size라는
parameter를 사용하고, larlge_pool_min_alloc parameter는 이 large pool에
할당될 최소한의 memory chunk size를 제한한다. 이 large_pool_min_alloc의
값이 클수록 large pool의 fragmentation은 줄어든다.
만약 이 parameter를 지정하지 않으면 large pool은 사용하지 않는다. 그러나 다음
중 하나라도 만족되는 상황에서는 large pool에 관한 parameter가 설정되어 있지
않다 하더라도 Oracle이 자동으로 필요한 large pool을 계산하여 할당하여 사용한다.
- parallel_automatic_tuning = true
- parallel_min_servers=n
- dbwr_io_slaves=n
large pool size에 대한 계산은 다음 값에 의해서 결정된다.
- parallel_max_servers
- parallel_threads_per_cpu
- parallel_server_instances
- mts_dispatchers
- dbwr_io_slaves
이러한 default에 의해 계산된 large pool이 너무 크게 되면, performance에
문제가 생기거나 db startup이 안 될 수 있다. 그러므로 이러한 때에는 적당
한 값의 large_pool_size로 지정한 후 다시 startup하여야 한다.

Calculating Large Pool value

Hi,
I need to determine the 'large pool' size to be implemented for using RMAN. (We already have RMAN running). I need to know what parameters I need to set in init.ora for large_pool to work efficiently in conjunction with RMAN. How do I calculate the required size. I found some material on this, here, but it's confusing.
By default LARGE POOL = 0, unless PARALLEL_AUTOMATIC_TUNING = TRUE, (in which case LP will be set automatically). Also, set LARGE_POOL_MIN_ALLOC to a non-zero value to enable a minimum allocation with LP.
When I read document (ID 73079.1) it gets more confusing, as whether to take MULTIBLOCK-READ-COUNT value or DB_FILE_DIRECT_IO_COUNT into consideration. Also, what is the number of datafiles, (is it the same as db_files in init.ora ??)
Thanks in advance, Sreedhar
[email protected]
null

Hi ...
Take care about use LARGE_POOL if your database also use MTS . All MTS services will be deployed at the large_pool.
Just consider it ...
Regards,
Jose Ramon

ORA-4031 [512024] [large pool] [unknown object] [large pool] [PX msg pool]

Hello Friends,
I am frequently getting error in alert.log file.
ORA-4031 [512024] [large pool] [unknown object] [large pool] [PX msg pool]
Database version: 11gR2
OS : Solaris 10
SGA Size 4gb
SGA Target 4112mb
I am unable to identify the cause for above error.
Some time database become hang.
I can also see many wait events "latch: parallel query alloc buffer"
Please guide me what could be the cause of this problem

Hi
Please check below which could be helpful for your issue:
Master Note for Diagnosing ORA-4031 [ID 1088239.1]
https://support.oracle.com/CSP/ui/flash.html#tab=Dashboard%28page=GRHome&id=gkzpuq90%28domainId=ORA4031%29%29
Regard
Helios

Increased Shared Pool size longer hot backup time?

Hello,
I have hot backup that usually took 2 hours to complete. Then we had to increase Shared pool size from 280Mb to 380Mb due to some performance issue.
One week after increase of size the hot backup is taking 4 hours to complete. Since there was no other changes to the system I am suspecting size increase
of Shared Pool from 280Mb to 380Mb might be is reason for such drastic increase of backup time.
I would like to get your comments on my suspicion to the problem.
thank you

Paul.S wrote:
One week after increase of size the hot backup is taking 4 hours to complete. Since there was no other changes to the system I am suspecting size increase of Shared Pool from 280Mb to 380Mb might be is reason for such drastic increase of backup time.Hmm... at first glance it does not seem that this is the problem.. but perhaps it contributes to it.
When a SQL hits the SQL engine, the 1st thing the SQL engine does is determine if there is an existing parsed and ready-to-use copy of that SQL. If there is, that existing SQL is re-used - thus the name SQL Shared Pool. The resulting soft parse of the SQL is a lot faster (or should be) than a hard parse . A hard parse is where there is no re-usable copy, and the SQL needs to be parsed, validated and execution plan determined, etc.
Kind of like re-using an existing compiled program (with different input data) versus compiling that program before using it. (and that is what source SQL is - a program that needs to be compiled).
Okay, now what happens if there 100's of 1000's of SQLs in your shared pool? The scan that the SQL engine does to determine if there is a re-usable cursor, becomes pretty slow. A soft parse quickly becomes very expensive.
The problem is typically clients that create SQLs that are not sharable (where the input data is hardcoded into the program, instead of input variables to the program). In other words, SQLs that do not use bind variables.
Each and every hardcoded SQL that hits the SQL engine, is now a brand new SQL. And requires storage in the SQL Shared Pool. Shared Pool footprint grows and you start getting errors like insufficient shared pool memory.. and increase the shared pool which means even more space to store even more unique non-sharable SQLs and making soft and hard parses even more expensive.
Like moving the wall a few metres further and then running even faster into it. !http://www.pprune.org/forums/images/smilies2/eusa_wall.gif!
Now if the backup fires off a load of SQLs against the SQL engine, the fast soft/hard parses can now be a lot slower than previously, thanks to a larger shared pool that now caters for more junk than before.
Unsure if this is the problem that you are experiencing.. but assuming that your suspicion is correct, it offers an explanation as to why there can be a degradation in performance.

ORA-04031 on 10g - should I just adjust my SGA POOL SIZE?

Has anyone gotten this message frequently:
ORA-04031: unable to allocate 37536 bytes of shared memory ("shared pool","unknown object","sga heap(1,0)","session parame")
We are a business intelligence application that issues lots of large queries. We just migrated to 10g and we are seeing this every 2-3 days on our testing machine.
In particular, I am not sure about "sga heap"... I would just set my Shared Pool Size higher - currently 144 MB but will this help here? Thoughts?

In Oracle 10g a new feature called "automatic memory management" allows the dba to reserve a pool of shared memory that is used to allocate the shared pool, the buffer cache, the java pool and the large pool.
In general, when the database needs to allocate a large object into the shared pool and cannot find contiguous space available, it will automatically increase the shared pool size using free space from other SGA structure.
Since the space allocation is automatically managed by Oracle, the probability of getting ora-4031 errors may be greatly reduced. Automatic Memory Management is enabled when the parameter SGA_TARGET is greater than zero and the current setting can be obtained quering the v$sga_dynamic_components view.
Please refer to the 10g Administration Manual for further reference
http://download-west.oracle.com/docs/cd/B19306_01/server.102/b14231/toc.htm

Altering the Shared Pool Size

I am trying to start an oracle instance and tell it to use the init.ora file. However i am receiveing an error about my pool size being too small. Please see below:
SQL> startup pfile=/home/oracle/OraHome_1/dbs/init.ora
ORA-00371: not enough shared pool memory, should be atleast 52132659 bytes
I checked init.ora and the shared_pool_size is set to 3500000. However, i tried the other settings, as it had a medium and a large option, i tried these just to see what would happen. It didn't work, and i don't think this is the problem.
I then tried this query:
SQL> SELECT shared_pool_size_for_estimate,
2 shared_pool_size_factor,
3 estd_lc_time_saved
4 FROM v$shared_pool_advice;
And it output the settings for my shared_pool_size. The setting for "level 1: 76".
Can anyone tell me if this is too low, or how to fix this problem?
Thanks,
Gary

Set shared_pool_size to 83886080. Depending on your
RAM and your applications you may need to further
increase this value.I did this and tried to start oracle, i then got this error:
SQL> startup pfile=/home/oracle/OraHome_1/dbs/init.ora
ORACLE instance started.
Total System Global Area 117440512 bytes
Fixed Size 777952 bytes
Variable Size 116400416 bytes
Database Buffers 0 bytes
Redo Buffers 262144 bytes
ORA-00205: error in identifying controlfile, check alert log for more info
Any ideas on what this means?
I have googled, but i'm not sure. In init.ora i found this abotu control files:
# define two control files by default
control_files = (ora_control1, ora_control2)
Does this look right?
Gary.

Look into the Large Pool

Can some one told me , how to check Large pool inside.
Why Large pool is using more memory.
Which processes are running in the Large Pool

Hi,
The V$SGASTAT dynamic performance view has a column called POOL. It is used to contain the pool area where that particular type of object is being stored. By issuing a summation select against the V$SGASTAT view, a DBA can quickly determine the size of the large pool area currently being used.
SELECT name, SUM(bytes) FROM V$SGASTAT WHERE pool='LARGE POOL' GROUP BY ROLLUP(name);
Sizing the large pool can be complex. The large pool, if configured, must be at least 600 kilobytes in size. Usually, for most MTS applications, 600 is enough. However, if PQO (parallel query option) is also used in your Oracle8,Oracle8i, or Oracle9i environment, then the size of the large pool will increase dramatically.
The V$SGASTAT dynamic performance view has a new column in Oracle8 called POOL. It is used to contain the pool area where that particular type of object is being stored. By issuing a summation select against the V$SGASTAT view, a DBA can quickly determine the size of the large pool area currently being used.
Hope this helps. . .
Don Burleson
Oracle Press author

Connection pool size limit error

Hi all,
I am trying to execute a BAPI function from MII, execution fails with the following message;
[ERROR] Unable to make RFC call Exception: [Problem retrieving JCO.Function object: Connection pool <ECC_Server>:800:02:EN:ECCUser is exhausted. The current pool size limit (max connections) is 1 connections.]
[WARN] [SAP_JCo_Function_0] Skipping execution of output links due to action failure.
[ERROR] Uncaught exception from SAP_JCo_Function_0, Problem retrieving JCO.Function object: Connection pool <ECC_Server>:800:02:EN:ECCUser is exhausted. The current pool size limit (max connections) is 1 connections.
Config:
1. In 'SAP MII: Connections' of type JCO and have given pool size to 100.
2. In 'SAP MII: Credential Stores' store is created and same is being used in Start Session.
3. In JCO_Function block, we can search for the Function Module and set it.
MII Version:
14.0.2 Build(82)
Am I missing something?
Has any one seen this? please advise.
Thanks,
Message was edited by: Shridhar N

Check if there is another JCo connection configured with the same IP and User. I have found in the past that even though there are two connections configured because they have the same ip and user they are put into one pool with the lowest max pool of the two connections.

How do I set up iPhoto '11 version 9.2.1 to send emails with medium/Large/actual size? I try sending photos to a publisher and iPhoto automatically shrinks them to about 40 kB. Publisher needs between 0.5 and 7 MB. My ISP has a limit of 12MB

How can I get to email photos at higher resolution?
My "iPhoto" or "Mail" automatically reduces photos to about 40 KB .
My photos, taken with a common Panasonic Lumix DMC-TZ20 include flora which I send to a publisher.
I am fairly new to my MacBook (Mac S X Version 10.6.8). I have been using it for a year.
I found I could not successfully send Large or Full size photos.
A few days ago I downloaded a new version of iPhoto (iPhoto '11 version 9.2.1).
Again, although I get the option of choosing to send small/medium/large//full size photos, it actually only sends them as "Small" (ie about 40kb) which is useless to publish. If I drag a picture onto the desktop (where my EXIF tells me it is full size) then attach it to an email by dragging, againg the sent email is at "small" size ~40KB).
My ISP (Westnet) tells me that their maximum accepted size is 12 MB.
I suspect that I have failed to set up iPhoto for this purpose. (I am well into retirement but, although geriatric, did study University Physics about half a century ago)

Also, just a note. iMac PPC is about iMacs that were available up to early 2006. iMac Intel is for iMacs that were made available early in to 2006 to present. Forums for what you have in your profile include:
https://discussions.apple.com/community/mac_os/mac_os_x_v10.6_snow_leopard
https://discussions.apple.com/community/ilife/iphoto
https://discussions.apple.com/community/notebooks/macbook
Please consider posting and reviewing those locations in the future when you have a question that pertains to one of those products. You'll much more likely get a resposne then. This is a user to user forum, and you have to seek knowledge in the areas that are most likely to have the topic of your interest.

How do I set the initial servlet pool size in WL 5.1

 In WL 4.5, I can set the initial servlet pool size using the
 weblogic.httpd.servlet.SingleThreadedModelPoolSize. I tried to set this property in WL 5.1, and get an "Found undeclared property..." message when booting WL. Is this feature still supported in WL 5.1? If so, how do I set it?
 Thankx


It appears that pool size of 5 is hardcoded somewhere - no matter where you specify
 weblogic.httpd.servlet.SingleThreadedModelPoolSize, the following test servlet:
 import javax.servlet.*;
 import javax.servlet.http.*;
 public class SingleT extends HttpServlet implements SingleThreadModel {
 static int instanceCount = 0;
 public SingleT() {
 super();
 System.out.println("Instance " + (++instanceCount) + " created");
 always produces:
 Instance 1 created
 Wed Nov 01 11:15:36 PST 2000: <ServletContext-General> SingleT: init
 Instance 2 created
 Wed Nov 01 11:15:36 PST 2000: <ServletContext-General> SingleT: init
 Instance 3 created
 Wed Nov 01 11:15:36 PST 2000: <ServletContext-General> SingleT: init
 Instance 4 created
 Wed Nov 01 11:15:36 PST 2000: <ServletContext-General> SingleT: init
 Instance 5 created
 Wed Nov 01 11:15:36 PST 2000: <ServletContext-General> SingleT: init
 Joe Trung <[email protected]> wrote:
 > Hi Huy,
 > There are lot of 'undeclared' stuffes if you move from 451 to 51.
 > However, if you run WLS with
 > '-Dweblogic.httpd.servlet.SingleThreadedModelPoolSize=10'
 > You will get what you want. I think BEA has moved this option to the <System props>, no more in its <config>
 > Joe
 > "Huy Pham" <[email protected]> wrote:
 >>
 >>In WL 4.5, I can set the initial servlet pool size using the
 >>weblogic.httpd.servlet.SingleThreadedModelPoolSize. I tried to set this property in WL 5.1, and get an "Found undeclared property..." message when booting WL. Is this feature still supported in WL 5.1? If so, how do I set it?
 >>
 >>Thankx
 Dimitri

"max-pool-size" what is it good for?

SCreator simple CRUD use:
After a while I get:
" Error in allocating a connection. Cause: In-use connections equal max-pool-size and expired max-wait-time. Cannot allocate more connection"
Which is odd, because its just me using the server/database. It looks like every tiime I run a test, another conection is lost.
Do I have to restart the server? Is there a way to say "its only me, reuse a single connection"
why does "connection pooling" make life harder?
Can I turn it of?
cheers
cts

I got the same error in my JSC project. I search for few days and i found the solution. I do a mistake in my page Navigation. I forgot a slash in <to-view-id>.
A bad example:
<navigation-rule>
<from-view-id>/*</from-view-id>
<navigation-case>
<from-outcome>page13</from-outcome>
<to-view-id>page13.jsp</to-view-id>
</navigation-case>
A good example:
<from-view-id>/*</from-view-id>
<navigation-case>
<from-outcome>page13</from-outcome>
<to-view-id>/page13.jsp</to-view-id>
</navigation-case>
with this mistake, the afterRenderedResponse() was never called, and the ResultRowSet was never closed.
Korbben.

SharePoint - Error_1_Error occurred in deployment step 'Add Solution': Timeout expired. The timeout period elapsed prior to obtaining a connection from the pool. This may have occurred because all pooled connections were in use and max pool size was rea

Hi,
I am Shanmugavel, SharePoint developer,
I am facing the below SharePoint 2013 deployment issue while deploying using VS2012.
If i will deploy the same wsp or existing wsp
(last build) using direct powershell deployment, the solution adding properly, but the same timeout exception coming while activation the features. Please find the below error.
I tried the below activists:
1. Restarted my dev server, DB server.
2. tried the same solution id different server
3. tried existing wsp file (last build version)
4. Deactivated all the features, including project Active deployment configuration.... but still i am facing the same issue.
I hope this is not coding level issue, because still my code is not start running, before that some problem coming.
Please help me any one..... Last two days i am struck because of this...

What you need to understand is the installation of a WSP does not do much. It just makes sure that you relevant solution files are deployed to the SharePoint farm.
Next comes the point when you activate the features. It is when the code which you have written to "Activate" certain features for your custom solution.
Regarding the error you are getting, it typically means that you have more connections (default is I guess 100) open for a SQL database then you are allowed to.
If you have a custom database and you are opening a connection, make sure you close it as well.
Look at the similar discussion here:
The timeout period elapsed prior to obtaining a connection from the pool. This may have occurred because all pooled connections were in use and max pool
size was reached[^]
I would suggest further to look at the
ULS logs[^] to get better insight.
Manas Bhardwaj's Stream : www.manasbhardwaj.net

Large page sizes on Solaris 9

I am trying (and failing) to utilize large page sizes on a Solaris 9 machine.
# uname -a
SunOS machinename.lucent.com 5.9 Generic_112233-11 sun4u sparc SUNW,Sun-Blade-1000
I am using as my reference "Supporting Multiple Page Sizes in the Solaris� Operating System" http://www.sun.com/blueprints/0304/817-6242.pdf
and
"Taming Your Emu to Improve Application Performance (February 2004)"
http://www.sun.com/blueprints/0204/817-5489.pdf
The machine claims it supports 4M page sizes:
# pagesize -a
8192
65536
524288
4194304
I've written a very simple program:
main()
int sz = 10*1024*1024;
int x = (int)malloc(sz);
print_info((void**)&x, 1);
while (1) {
int i = 0;
while (i < (sz/sizeof(int))) {
x[i++]++;
I run it specifying a 4M heap size:
# ppgsz -o heap=4M ./malloc_and_sleep
address 0x21260 is backed by physical page 0x300f5260 of size 8192
pmap also shows it has an 8K page:
pmap -sx `pgrep malloc` | more
10394: ./malloc_and_sleep
Address Kbytes RSS Anon Locked Pgsz Mode Mapped File
00010000 8 8 - - 8K r-x-- malloc_and_sleep
00020000 8 8 8 - 8K rwx-- malloc_and_sleep
00022000 3960 3960 3960 - 8K rwx-- [ heap ]
00400000 6288 6288 6288 - 8K rwx-- [ heap ]
(The last 2 lines above show about 10M of heap, with a pgsz of 8K.)
I'm running this as root.
In addition to the ppgsz approach, I have also tried using memcntl and mmap'ing ANON memory (and others). Memcntl gives an error for 2MB page sizes, but reports success with a 4MB page size - but still, pmap reports the memcntl'd memory as using an 8K page size.
Here's the output from sysinfo:
General Information
Host Name is machinename.lucent.com
Host Aliases is loghost
Host Address(es) is xxxxxxxx
Host ID is xxxxxxxxx
/opt/default/bin/sysinfo: /dev/ksyms is not a 32-bit kernel namelist
Manufacturer is Sun (Sun Microsystems)
/opt/default/bin/sysinfo: /dev/ksyms is not a 32-bit kernel namelist
/opt/default/bin/sysinfo: /dev/ksyms is not a 32-bit kernel namelist
System Model is Blade 1000
/opt/default/bin/sysinfo: /dev/ksyms is not a 32-bit kernel namelist
ROM Version is OBP 4.10.11 2003/09/25 11:53
Number of CPUs is 2
CPU Type is sparc
App Architecture is sparc
Kernel Architecture is sun4u
OS Name is SunOS
OS Version is 5.9
Kernel Version is SunOS Release 5.9 Version Generic_112233-11 [UNIX(R) System V Release 4.0]
/opt/default/bin/sysinfo: /dev/ksyms is not a 32-bit kernel namelist
Kernel Information
/opt/default/bin/sysinfo: /dev/ksyms is not a 32-bit kernel namelist
SysConf Information
Max combined size of argv[] and envp[] is 1048320
Max processes allowed to any UID is 29995
Clock ticks per second is 100
Max simultaneous groups per user is 16
Max open files per process is 256
System memory page size is 8192
Job control supported is TRUE
Savid ids (seteuid()) supported is TRUE
Version of POSIX.1 standard supported is 199506
Version of the X/Open standard supported is 3
Max log name is 8
Max password length is 8
Number of processors (CPUs) configured is 2
Number of processors (CPUs) online is 2
Total number of pages of physical memory is 262144
Number of pages of physical memory not currently in use is 4368
Max number of I/O operations in single list I/O call is 4096
Max amount a process can decrease its async I/O priority level is 0
Max number of timer expiration overruns is 2147483647
Max number of open message queue descriptors per process is 32
Max number of message priorities supported is 32
Max number of realtime signals is 8
Max number of semaphores per process is 2147483647
Max value a semaphore may have is 2147483647
Max number of queued signals per process is 32
Max number of timers per process is 32
Supports asyncronous I/O is TRUE
Supports File Synchronization is TRUE
Supports memory mapped files is TRUE
Supports process memory locking is TRUE
Supports range memory locking is TRUE
Supports memory protection is TRUE
Supports message passing is TRUE
Supports process scheduling is TRUE
Supports realtime signals is TRUE
Supports semaphores is TRUE
Supports shared memory objects is TRUE
Supports syncronized I/O is TRUE
Supports timers is TRUE
/opt/default/bin/sysinfo: /dev/ksyms is not a 32-bit kernel namelist
Device Information
SUNW,Sun-Blade-1000
cpu0 is a "900 MHz SUNW,UltraSPARC-III+" CPU
cpu1 is a "900 MHz SUNW,UltraSPARC-III+" CPU
Does anyone have any idea as to what the problem might be?
Thanks in advance.
Mike

I ran your program on Solaris 10 (yet to be released) and it works.
Address Kbytes RSS Anon Locked Pgsz Mode Mapped File
00010000 8 8 - - 8K r-x-- mm
00020000 8 8 8 - 8K rwx-- mm
00022000 3960 3960 3960 - 8K rwx-- [ heap ]
00400000 8192 8192 8192 - 4M rwx-- [ heap ]
I think you don't this patch for Solaris 9
i386 114433-03
sparc 113471-04
Let me know if you encounter problem even after installing this patch.
Saurabh Mishra

Large pool size

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for