Limit Group Policy to specific OS
Hi. I'm sure this is a common scenario, but I would like to hear the forum members opinion as to the best way to do this. I have a Domain (currently Server 2003 DC) consisting of Windows 7 and Windows 8.1 workstations. I've created a GPO to control what
Windows 8 "modern" apps are available to users, using a PowerShell script. I only want it to run on Windows 8 machines, but I want it to be per user (in other words, I have it set in the user configurations). Do I put all those workstations into
a separate OU and link the GPO there, or do I use a wmi filter?
Thanks!
Thanks, Don for your reply. Indeed I am using that setting. I haven't actually tried either way yet, but yes, the idea is to put all the Win 8 machines into their own OU and use Loopback processing (merge). Or I could simply go with a wmi filter.
I was wondering what would be the better way to go.
Hmm, if you go down the WMI Filtering road, you'd need to link the GPO to the OU where your user accounts reside (since it's a \User Configuration\ setting that you're doing).
Otherwise, put the machines into an OU, link the GPO there, and enable Loopback processing. Replace or Merge is up to you/your requirements, i.e. if you need to override other inherited or linked \User Configuration\ settings..
Loopback processing can cause other unintended side-effects, to be on the lookout for those, plus, Loopback causes an extended processing time (due to the nature of loopback processing), so if you already have a long-ish processing time / logon time, you
might want to consider that.
An efficient WMI filter might be less-costly (processing-wise).
Test out both approaches in your environment to see which suits your situation - both are valid approaches.
Don
(Please take a moment to "Vote as Helpful" and/or "Mark as Answer", where applicable.
This helps the community, keeps the forums tidy, and recognises useful contributions. Thanks!)
Similar Messages
-
ISE 1.2 & AD & Meraki - Per User Group Policy ?
I am working on a PoC for a deployment in an MDU. We are using Meraki switches and access points. There are 250 units in the building, each unit will have it's own subnet. The goal is to have the tenant be able to connect to a common building SSID and be placed into their assigned VLAN. There will also be physical ports in each unit that will need to do the same. I am trying to figure out a way to use ISE to authorize on a per user basis and not based on groups of users. On the Meraki system there are group policies that will assign the VLAN for the user as well as any type of layer 7 firewalling and bandwidth control. So there will be 250 group policies, one for each unit. There is a deployment guide that shows how to setup ISE for use with Meraki and it is great but it assumes that there will be large groups like Employees, Contractors, etc.. that will be used. This is where I'm being tripped up, also... this is my first swing at a NAC deployment so I have a lot to learn.
1.Can I setup each user in Active Directory to have a tag that ISE can then forward on to Meraki for the group policy? Say it's unit 101 and I have a group policy called 101 in Meraki, Meraki documentation says to use the Airespace-ACL-Name attribute in ISE to indicate the group policy to use. This gives me the ability to place a group into that policy but not an individual. Or would this be better done by creating the users in ISE directly? Omit AD entirely?
2. Each unit will have devices that will need MAB because they are not 802.1x compatible. I need to do the same as above with them. I would create a separate SSID for these devices but then use the MAC address to authenticate them but will need to authorize them to go into a specific group policy.
I know this isn't a typical ISE application but I think that this will work really well in the end, just need to iron out these details and get a test system functioning. Any help would be greatly appreciated!!!
Thanks,
NathanPlease find the Meraki_ISE integration doc. in attachment.
When VLAN tagging is configured per user, multiple users can be associated to the same SSID, but their traffic is tagged with different VLAN IDs. This configuration is achieved by authenticating wireless devices or users against a customer-premise RADIUS server, which can return RADIUS attributes that convey the VLAN ID that should be assigned to a particular user’s traffic.
In order to perform per-user VLAN tagging, a RADIUS server must be used with one of the following settings:
MAC-based access control (no encryption)
WPA2-Enterprise with 802.1x authentication
A per-user VLAN tag can be applied in 3 different ways:
The RADIUS server returns a Tunnel-Private-Group-ID attribute in the Access-Accept message, which specifies the VLAN ID that should be applied to the wireless user. This VLAN ID could override whatever may be configured in the MCC (which could be no VLAN tagging, or a per-SSID VLAN tag). To have this VLAN ID take effect, “RADIUS override” must be set to “RADIUS response can override VLAN tag” under the Configure tab on the Access Control page in the “VLAN setup” section.
The RADIUS server returns a group policy attribute (e.g., Filter-ID) in the Access-Accept message. The group policy attribute specifies a group policy that should be applied to the wireless user, overriding the policy configured on the SSID itself. If the group policy includes a VLAN ID, the group policy’s VLAN ID will be applied to the user.
On the Client Details page, a client can be manually assigned a group policy. If the group policy includes a VLAN ID, the group policy’s VLAN ID will be applied to the user. -
The first, most important question of this thread is if I can form a wireless domain or if I have to do it wired.
If it matters, I have a Linksys E1200 router that does wireless and wired.
My second question refers to Group Policy. Is this the way domains limit their user account's capabilities? Because I was planning on making a domain, so that I could have unified user accounts that I could control from the server, limiting what those accounts
can access for further security. Is this what Group Policy does, and how would I move with starting that?Hi Adrian,
>>The first, most important question of this thread is if I can form a wireless domain or if I have to do it wired.
Just as Alan suggested, Active Directory domains support both wired and wireless connections.
>>My second question refers to Group Policy. Is this the way domains limit their user account's capabilities?
Group Policy is an infrastructure that allows you to implement specific configurations for users and computers. Group Policy settings are contained in Group Policy objects
(GPOs), which are linked to the following Active Directory directory service containers: sites, domains, or organizational units (OUs). The settings within GPOs are then evaluated by the affected targets, using the hierarchical nature of Active Directory.
Consequently, Group Policy is one of the top reasons to deploy Active Directory because it allows you to manage user and computer objects.
Regarding group policy, the following link and articles can be referred to for more information.
Group Policy for Beginners
http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/hh147307(v=WS.10).aspx
Group Policy Planning and Deployment Guide
http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/cc754948(v=WS.10).aspx
Group Policy
http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/windowsserver/bb310732.aspx
Best regards,
Frank Shen -
Very specific group policy for IE 11
Got a very interesting GPO I need created. I need a GPO that forces all users on a certain machine to use InPrivate browsing at all times while they are using IE. Or even for a specific website.
I have an application that has a bug that is fixed by using private browsing, weirdly enough. To limit problems with users saying "But I did use private browsing" I would ideally like to force the use of it while they are on the machine. If I have
to apply it to a specific group, that will be fine too, but the end result needs to be private browsing they cannot turn off at all.
Any suggestions? Open to Powershell solutions, or creative options.Hi Noah ,
The only group policy I have found related to the InPrivateBrowsing is this :
User Configuration, Administrative Templates, Windows Components, Internet Explorer, Privacy and Turn off InPrivate Browsing
But it is used to turn on /off the Inprivate Browsing feature and it can not be used to force the Inprivate Browsing .
I am afraid the only good option is to create a shortcut for the user if you want the user to open the Internet Explorer in private browsing mode every time .
Best regards
Please remember to mark the replies as answers if they help, and unmark the answers if they provide no help. If you have feedback for TechNet Support, contact [email protected] -
How to apply Software Restriction policy for specific user in local group policy object ?
I am working on implementing user based software restriction policy programmatically for local group policy object.
If i create a policy through Domain Controller,i do have option for software restriction policy in user configuration but in local group policy editor i don't have option for that.
When i look for the changes made by policy applied from Domain Controller in registry, they modifies registry values for specific users on path HKEY_USERS\(SID of User)\Softwares\Policies\Microsoft\Windows\Safer\Codeidentifiers
They also have registry.pol stored in SYSvol folder in Domain Controller. When i make the same changes in registry to block any other application, application is getting blocked.
I achieved what i wanted but is it right to modify registry values ?
PS:- I am using Igrouppolicyobject APII achieved what I wanted but is it right to modify registry values ?
You also can modify a registry programmatically based policy. Check this:
http://blogs.msdn.com/b/dsadsi/archive/2009/07/23/working-with-group-policy-objects-programmatically-simple-c-example-illustrating-how-to-modify-a-registry-based-policy.aspx
We are trying to better understand customer views on social support experience, so your participation in this interview project would be greatly appreciated if you have time. Thanks for helping make community forums a great place.
Click
HERE to participate the survey. -
Group policy -- Limit Developer Access to prod
I was asked to see if it's possible to prevent developers from using BIDS/SSDT, Visual Studio, SSIS or third-party
tool to pull data from production servers. It's ok for developers to us SSMS for read access to production servers,
but no pulling of prod data to his/her desktop or DEV servers. We do not want to revoke production read access
from developers, but we would like to prevent the extracting/pulling of production data by developers.
Is there such a way via group policy or whatever way possible? From top of my head, I think it's
a "NO".
Thanks,
John
JohnHi.
Within the scope of 'SQL SERVER' you can do this:
CREATE TRIGGER trg_bad_app
ON ALL SERVER WITH
EXECUTE AS 'some user'
FOR LOGON
AS
BEGIN
IF EXISTS (SELECT
FROM sys.dm_exec_sessions
WHERE session_id =
@@SPID
AND program_name IN
(N'Program', N'Program2', N'Program3')
ROLLBACK;
END;
But the program name is easily worked around if someone really wanted to connect.
Also, VSDT may not have a specific program name other than SQL Client.
Chas -
Group Policy Item level targeting LDAP Query for specific AD Sites
Hi Everyone,
I'm looking to try and take advantage of Group Policy Preference Item Level Targeting to publish user Proxy settings based on what AD Site a user is located in.
The company I work for has multiple proxies (for multiple regions). We have hundreds of AD Sites listed within our AD S and S setup. I know that I could potentially list every AD Site that requires a particular proxy, but this would generate additional admin
overhead each time a new site is commissioned, as well as each time a site is decommissioned (this is a construction company, so may "sites" can fluctuate rapidly).
Due to this, I would like to know if it is possible to filter by LDAP query, and filter for each proxy, based on a portion of the text/name of the AD Sites (as we use a specific naming convention for our sites, this could be dynamic enough for us to not
have to add or remove additional AD sites).
Is this possible, and, if so, how would I write the LDAP Filter/Query??
Right now I would assume I would do it in the following manner:
(&(objectCategory=site)(objectClass=site)(cn=AU-*)
Any assistance would be greatly appreciated.
Cheers,
Simon> Right now I would assume I would do it in the following manner:
>
> (&(objectCategory=site)(objectClass=site)(cn=AU-*)
Sites do NOT reside in the domain partition, but in the configuration
partition... You can verify your LDAP filter with
dsquery * -filter "(your filter here)"
This query will return all matching objects' distinguished names (DN).
But why don't you use the "Sites" ILT instead? This ILT supports ? and *
as wildcards, so it might be sufficient.
Martin
Mal ein
GUTES Buch über GPOs lesen?
NO THEY ARE NOT EVIL, if you know what you are doing:
Good or bad GPOs?
And if IT bothers me - coke bottle design refreshment :)) -
Question on a specific Group Policy setting for SCCM Updates
Hello,
This may not exactly be the correct forum for this question but in looking around I didn't come up with an immediate answer and was hoping someone else had this issue.
I have a WSUS server and am moving over to SCCM for updates. I've actually had success in getting 2 sets of patches installed after some very frustrating days thanks to people here.
I've noticed that when I switch workstations to my AD folder that has the SCCM Updates GPO instead of our standard WSUS GPO that we get action center errors "Set up Windows Update", "Windows Update is not set up". When we click
the flag it tells us to "Choose an Update Option".
In my new GPO I do have Configure Automatic Updates Enabled for "Auto Download and notify for install" but we still get this warning. Is there a differnet setting that controls this action that anyone is aware of in their experience? I looked
through the other settings but didn't se anything obvious.
Thanks for any help!Hi Dustin,
I'd read a number of different things trying to solve the problem. That article looked a little familiar but I re-read it carefully.
I do have "specify intranet Microsoft Update service location" set to Not Configured as someone had correctly pointed me to that as the reason I was not getting updates.
I did not have "Allow signed updates from an Intranet Micorsoft update server" enabled so that shoudl help some.
"Configure Automatic Updates" was enabled because I, incorectly, thoguth that's all that might be needed since Ihad to make sure I'd Not Configured the first setting.
I had "Turn on Recommended Updates" Enabled so I put it back to not configured.
I understand that turning things to Not Configured doesn't necessarily change any previous group policy settings so I may be getting some fallout from having a WSUS server on these systems before. I'd just like to aviod having to have everyone go into the
action center and manually click to configure updates.
I'll see if my one setting change has any effect.
UPDATE: I forced a gpupdate and the red flag in the action center has not disappeared. -
Group Policy "Restricted Groups" (local groups) using group policy preferences
I was recently tasked a solution with creating a group policy to manage RDP user access to a set of Active Directory computer objects.
Part of the solution was to create a policy so that this would only apply a specific security group(users) to a specific set of Active Directory computer objects within the OU to which it was applied so that other machines
and/or user accounts in this OU remain un affected by this policy.
The policy was to be able to include multiple sets of Security groups(users) for the associated machines isolating those security groups(users) to only their sets of Active Directory computer objects.
Reduce the requirement to create multiple group policies to apply different "Local Group"/"Restricted groups" management for computer objects in the domain.
I thouhgt about using System based policies and creating different WMI filters to target sets of AD Computer objects, but came to the conclusion this would not help due to the limited of WMI quries I would be able to create for a standard
Image.
So I then thought about group policy preferences and came up with the solution
I created a new Group policy and created a new item for the local group, in this instance but not limited to "Remote Desktop users (built-in)" and added the security group(users). In my case I did not need to use the "delete
all member users" or "delete all member groups" as I wanted other groups in this local group for the computer objects to remain intact.
Then what I did is set the "item-level-target" setting from "the common tab" on the GPP and set it to the security group which containd the AD computer objects the user accounts required access to. I then did a couple of standard
tests to confirm the local security group(users) appeared only on the machine in the item level target security group and applied to no other machines in the outside of SOM.
So with this in place, if I needed to create any other entries for different groups and access to specific machines all I need to do is create a new GPP item within this policy.
Being mindful that system policies settings if applied to same OU will take preceedence over GPP settings....
Thought I would just share this in-case anyone else has had similar requests/thoughts and or has other methods that they have used that they would like to share.
I am not sure either on the limit of entries that GPP have either so if anyone does know please post and possible links?
I have struggled to find an answer, however it could be that I am not asking the right question!good sharing...
Best,
Howtodo -
Using WMI Filter to apply group policy to users on computers in a security group
Hello all,
I've got a bunch of computers that I want to apply some user side polices that affect all users that log on to these specific computers (they are used for exams).
Unfortunately it is company policy to have a flat OU structure and as such moving these computers into their own OU is out of the question. Which brings me to wanting to create a WMI filter to limit the policy to running on computers only within the security
group and then set the security filtering to "Authenticated Users". The policy will be linked to the all student computers OU where a few thousand machines sit, but will only apply to 20 or so machines (I know it's messy).
Anyway that brings me to my question, can someone point me in the right direction for how I would go about creating this WMI query?
Cheers> I've got a bunch of computers that I want to apply some user side
> polices that affect all users that log on to these specific computers
> (they are used for exams).
That's what "Loopback" initially was designed for. Nowadays, we can use
some other tricks :)
http://evilgpo.blogspot.de/2012/02/loopback-demystified.html
http://blogs.technet.com/b/askds/archive/2013/02/08/circle-back-to-loopback.aspx
Martin
Mal ein
GUTES Buch über GPOs lesen?
NO THEY ARE NOT EVIL, if you know what you are doing:
Good or bad GPOs?
And if IT bothers me - coke bottle design refreshment :)) -
New to Windows Server 2008 R2 Administration.
I setup this Windows 2008 R2 Server on a Dell 2950 Poweredge server and have been migrating users off of an old NT style domain running on Samba 3.6 on CentOS.
I have the domain setup (nicholas.sacredheartsaratoga.org), added users, and have moved users / computers over to the new domain and working.
When attempting to setup Group Policy Objects, I continually get the "Failed to Open Group Policy Object" Error. This is driving me nuts and seems to be a 49 error.. which I have done a ton of research on but none of the suggested fixes seem
to be working.
I've been working at this for a couple of weeks and really need this fixed to be able to set GPO's correctly.
Here is my IPCONFIG /ALL
C:\Users\Administrator.NICHOLAS.000>ipconfig /all
Windows IP Configuration
Host Name . . . . . . . . . . . . : NICHOLAS
Primary Dns Suffix . . . . . . . : sacredheartsaratoga.org
Node Type . . . . . . . . . . . . : Hybrid
IP Routing Enabled. . . . . . . . : No
WINS Proxy Enabled. . . . . . . . : No
DNS Suffix Search List. . . . . . : nicholas.sacredheartsaratoga.org
Ethernet adapter Local Area Connection 2:
Connection-specific DNS Suffix . :
Description . . . . . . . . . . . : Broadcom BCM5708C NetXtreme II GigE (NDIS
VBD Client) #2
Physical Address. . . . . . . . . : 00-1D-09-27-F1-63
DHCP Enabled. . . . . . . . . . . : No
Autoconfiguration Enabled . . . . : Yes
Link-local IPv6 Address . . . . . : fe80::542:43f2:2aaf:d903%13(Preferred)
IPv4 Address. . . . . . . . . . . : 10.10.20.21(Preferred)
Subnet Mask . . . . . . . . . . . : 255.255.255.0
Default Gateway . . . . . . . . . : 10.10.20.3
DHCPv6 IAID . . . . . . . . . . . : 301997321
DHCPv6 Client DUID. . . . . . . . : 00-01-00-01-19-7D-DC-B6-00-1D-09-27-F1-61
DNS Servers . . . . . . . . . . . : 10.10.20.21
NetBIOS over Tcpip. . . . . . . . : Enabled
Tunnel adapter isatap.{41653A38-9372-4740-BB03-41950A9C9BC0}:
Media State . . . . . . . . . . . : Media disconnected
Connection-specific DNS Suffix . :
Description . . . . . . . . . . . : Microsoft ISATAP Adapter
Physical Address. . . . . . . . . : 00-00-00-00-00-00-00-E0
DHCP Enabled. . . . . . . . . . . : No
Autoconfiguration Enabled . . . . : Yes
Tunnel adapter Local Area Connection* 9:
Media State . . . . . . . . . . . : Media disconnected
Connection-specific DNS Suffix . :
Description . . . . . . . . . . . : Teredo Tunneling Pseudo-Interface
Physical Address. . . . . . . . . : 00-00-00-00-00-00-00-E0
DHCP Enabled. . . . . . . . . . . : No
Autoconfiguration Enabled . . . . : YesWill post the entire contents of my gpreport as soon as my account is verified... but this is the jist of the error being reported:
Component Status<v:group alt="Error" class="vmlimage" coordsize="100,100" style="width:15px;height:15px;vertical-align:middle;"><v:oval class="vmlimage" fillcolor="red" strokecolor="red" style="width:100px;height:100px;"></v:oval><v:line
class="vmlimage" from="25,25" strokecolor="white" strokeweight="3px" style="" to="75,75"></v:line><v:line class="vmlimage" from="75,25" strokecolor="white" strokeweight="3px" style="" to="25,75"></v:line></v:group>
Component Name
Status
Last Process Time
Group Policy Infrastructure
Failed
2/17/2014 2:50:06 PM
Group Policy Infrastructure failed due to the error listed below.
Logon failure: unknown user name or bad password.
Note: Due to the GP Core failure, none of the other Group Policy components processed their policy. Consequently, status information for the other components is not available.
Additional information may have been logged. Review the Policy Events tab in the console or the application event log for events between 2/17/2014 2:50:05 PM and 2/17/2014 2:50:06 PM.
Registry
(N/A)
1/4/2014 1:45:29 PM
Security
(N/A)
1/4/2014 1:45:35 PM
User Configuration Summary -
Group Policy processing failure on 2008 when MIX Domain 2003 with DC 2008
Dear I try to add additional Windows 2008 Domain to My Domain controller 2003 and I ma Receiving Group policy error in DC 2008 With Event ID 1055
The processing of Group Policy failed. Windows could not resolve the computer name. This could be caused by one of more of the following:
a) Name Resolution failure on the current domain controller.
b) Active Directory Replication Latency (an account created on another domain controller has not replicated to the current domain controller).
- <Event xmlns="http://schemas.microsoft.com/win/2004/08/events/event">
- <System>
<Provider Name="Microsoft-Windows-GroupPolicy" Guid="{AEA1B4FA-97D1-45F2-A64C-4D69FFFD92C9}" />
<EventID>1055</EventID>
<Version>0</Version>
<Level>2</Level>
<Task>0</Task>
<Opcode>1</Opcode>
<Keywords>0x8000000000000000</Keywords>
<TimeCreated SystemTime="2014-03-06T14:36:44.411955300Z" />
<EventRecordID>3859</EventRecordID>
<Correlation ActivityID="{28DAD258-26D0-4C1E-A4B7-F37DEE04C8F1}" />
<Execution ProcessID="952" ThreadID="3276" />
<Channel>System</Channel>
<Computer>PRIMARYDC.Qtit.com</Computer>
<Security UserID="S-1-5-18" />
</System>
- <EventData>
<Data Name="SupportInfo1">1</Data>
<Data Name="SupportInfo2">1632</Data>
<Data Name="ProcessingMode">0</Data>
<Data Name="ProcessingTimeInMilliseconds">1578</Data>
<Data Name="ErrorCode">5</Data>
<Data Name="ErrorDescription">Access is denied.</Data>
</EventData>
</Event>
I install See KB939820 for a hotfix applicable to Microsoft DC 2003 regrading to he KRBTGT account
Refer Url : http://support.microsoft.com/kb/939820
I run dcdiag /v on and repadmin /showrepl at DC 2008
the dcdiag /v result
Directory Server Diagnosis
Performing initial setup:
Trying to find home server...
* Verifying that the local machine PRIMARYDC, is a Directory Server.
Home Server = PRIMARYDC
* Connecting to directory service on server PRIMARYDC.
* Identified AD Forest.
Collecting AD specific global data
* Collecting site info.
Calling ldap_search_init_page(hld,CN=Sites,CN=Configuration,DC=Qtit,DC=com,LDAP_SCOPE_SUBTREE,(objectCategory=ntDSSiteSettings),.......
The previous call succeeded
Iterating through the sites
Looking at base site object: CN=NTDS Site Settings,CN=Default-First-Site-Name,CN=Sites,CN=Configuration,DC=Qtit,DC=com
Getting ISTG and options for the site
* Identifying all servers.
Calling ldap_search_init_page(hld,CN=Sites,CN=Configuration,DC=Qtit,DC=com,LDAP_SCOPE_SUBTREE,(objectClass=ntDSDsa),.......
The previous call succeeded....
The previous call succeeded
Iterating through the list of servers
Getting information for the server CN=NTDS Settings,CN=SECONDAD,CN=Servers,CN=Default-First-Site-Name,CN=Sites,CN=Configuration,DC=Qtit,DC=com
objectGuid obtained
InvocationID obtained
dnsHostname obtained
site info obtained
All the info for the server collected
Getting information for the server CN=NTDS Settings,CN=PRIMARYDC,CN=Servers,CN=Default-First-Site-Name,CN=Sites,CN=Configuration,DC=Qtit,DC=com
objectGuid obtained
InvocationID obtained
dnsHostname obtained
site info obtained
All the info for the server collected
* Identifying all NC cross-refs.
* Found 2 DC(s). Testing 1 of them.
Done gathering initial info.
Doing initial required tests
Testing server: Default-First-Site-Name\PRIMARYDC
Starting test: Connectivity
* Active Directory LDAP Services Check
Determining IP4 connectivity
* Active Directory RPC Services Check
......................... PRIMARYDC passed test Connectivity
Doing primary tests
Testing server: Default-First-Site-Name\PRIMARYDC
Starting test: Advertising
The DC PRIMARYDC is advertising itself as a DC and having a DS.
The DC PRIMARYDC is advertising as an LDAP server
The DC PRIMARYDC is advertising as having a writeable directory
The DC PRIMARYDC is advertising as a Key Distribution Center
The DC PRIMARYDC is advertising as a time server
The DS PRIMARYDC is advertising as a GC.
......................... PRIMARYDC passed test Advertising
Test omitted by user request: CheckSecurityError
Test omitted by user request: CutoffServers
Starting test: FrsEvent
* The File Replication Service Event log test
There are warning or error events within the last 24 hours after the
SYSVOL has been shared. Failing SYSVOL replication problems may cause
Group Policy problems.
A warning event occurred. EventID: 0x800034C8
Time Generated: 03/06/2014 10:18:56
Event String:
The File Replication Service has detected an enabled disk write cache on the drive containing the directory c:\windows\ntfrs\jet on the computer PRIMARYDC. The File Replication Service might not recover when power to
the drive is interrupted and critical updates are lost.
A warning event occurred. EventID: 0x800034C8
Time Generated: 03/06/2014 10:53:21
Event String:
The File Replication Service has detected an enabled disk write cache on the drive containing the directory c:\windows\ntfrs\jet on the computer PRIMARYDC. The File Replication Service might not recover when power to
the drive is interrupted and critical updates are lost.
......................... PRIMARYDC passed test FrsEvent
Starting test: DFSREvent
The DFS Replication Event Log.
Skip the test because the server is running FRS.
......................... PRIMARYDC passed test DFSREvent
Starting test: SysVolCheck
* The File Replication Service SYSVOL ready test
File Replication Service's SYSVOL is ready
......................... PRIMARYDC passed test SysVolCheck
Starting test: KccEvent
* The KCC Event log test
Found no KCC errors in "Directory Service" Event log in the last 15 minutes.
......................... PRIMARYDC passed test KccEvent
Starting test: KnowsOfRoleHolders
Role Schema Owner = CN=NTDS Settings,CN=SECONDAD,CN=Servers,CN=Default-First-Site-Name,CN=Sites,CN=Configuration,DC=Qtit,DC=com
Role Domain Owner = CN=NTDS Settings,CN=SECONDAD,CN=Servers,CN=Default-First-Site-Name,CN=Sites,CN=Configuration,DC=Qtit,DC=com
Role PDC Owner = CN=NTDS Settings,CN=SECONDAD,CN=Servers,CN=Default-First-Site-Name,CN=Sites,CN=Configuration,DC=Qtit,DC=com
Role Rid Owner = CN=NTDS Settings,CN=SECONDAD,CN=Servers,CN=Default-First-Site-Name,CN=Sites,CN=Configuration,DC=Qtit,DC=com
Role Infrastructure Update Owner = CN=NTDS Settings,CN=SECONDAD,CN=Servers,CN=Default-First-Site-Name,CN=Sites,CN=Configuration,DC=Qtit,DC=com
......................... PRIMARYDC passed test KnowsOfRoleHolders
Starting test: MachineAccount
Checking machine account for DC PRIMARYDC on DC PRIMARYDC.
* SPN found :LDAP/PRIMARYDC.Qtit.com/Qtit.com
* SPN found :LDAP/PRIMARYDC.Qtit.com
* SPN found :LDAP/PRIMARYDC
* SPN found :LDAP/PRIMARYDC.Qtit.com/QTIT
* SPN found :LDAP/e3d8c76c-1b59-4de6-9f7f-c438df9a2863._msdcs.Qtit.com
* SPN found :E3514235-4B06-11D1-AB04-00C04FC2DCD2/e3d8c76c-1b59-4de6-9f7f-c438df9a2863/Qtit.com
* SPN found :HOST/PRIMARYDC.Qtit.com/Qtit.com
* SPN found :HOST/PRIMARYDC.Qtit.com
* SPN found :HOST/PRIMARYDC
* SPN found :HOST/PRIMARYDC.Qtit.com/QTIT
* SPN found :GC/PRIMARYDC.Qtit.com/Qtit.com
......................... PRIMARYDC passed test MachineAccount
Starting test: NCSecDesc
* Security Permissions check for all NC's on DC PRIMARYDC.
The forest is not ready for RODC. Will skip checking ERODC ACEs.
* Security Permissions Check for
DC=ForestDnsZones,DC=Qtit,DC=com
(NDNC,Version 3)
Error NT AUTHORITY\ENTERPRISE DOMAIN CONTROLLERS doesn't have
Replicating Directory Changes In Filtered Set
access rights for the naming context:
DC=ForestDnsZones,DC=Qtit,DC=com
* Security Permissions Check for
DC=DomainDnsZones,DC=Qtit,DC=com
(NDNC,Version 3)
Error NT AUTHORITY\ENTERPRISE DOMAIN CONTROLLERS doesn't have
Replicating Directory Changes In Filtered Set
access rights for the naming context:
DC=DomainDnsZones,DC=Qtit,DC=com
* Security Permissions Check for
CN=Schema,CN=Configuration,DC=Qtit,DC=com
(Schema,Version 3)
* Security Permissions Check for
CN=Configuration,DC=Qtit,DC=com
(Configuration,Version 3)
* Security Permissions Check for
DC=Qtit,DC=com
(Domain,Version 3)
......................... PRIMARYDC failed test NCSecDesc
Starting test: NetLogons
* Network Logons Privileges Check
Verified share \\PRIMARYDC\netlogon
Verified share \\PRIMARYDC\sysvol
......................... PRIMARYDC passed test NetLogons
Starting test: ObjectsReplicated
PRIMARYDC is in domain DC=Qtit,DC=com
Checking for CN=PRIMARYDC,OU=Domain Controllers,DC=Qtit,DC=com in domain DC=Qtit,DC=com on 1 servers
Object is up-to-date on all servers.
Checking for CN=NTDS Settings,CN=PRIMARYDC,CN=Servers,CN=Default-First-Site-Name,CN=Sites,CN=Configuration,DC=Qtit,DC=com in domain CN=Configuration,DC=Qtit,DC=com on 1 servers
Object is up-to-date on all servers.
......................... PRIMARYDC passed test ObjectsReplicated
Test omitted by user request: OutboundSecureChannels
Starting test: Replications
* Replications Check
* Replication Latency Check
DC=ForestDnsZones,DC=Qtit,DC=com
Latency information for 18 entries in the vector were ignored.
18 were retired Invocations. 0 were either: read-only replicas and are not verifiably latent, or dc's no longer replicating this nc. 0 had no latency information (Win2K DC).
DC=DomainDnsZones,DC=Qtit,DC=com
Latency information for 18 entries in the vector were ignored.
18 were retired Invocations. 0 were either: read-only replicas and are not verifiably latent, or dc's no longer replicating this nc. 0 had no latency information (Win2K DC).
CN=Schema,CN=Configuration,DC=Qtit,DC=com
Latency information for 20 entries in the vector were ignored.
20 were retired Invocations. 0 were either: read-only replicas and are not verifiably latent, or dc's no longer replicating this nc. 0 had no latency information (Win2K DC).
CN=Configuration,DC=Qtit,DC=com
Latency information for 20 entries in the vector were ignored.
20 were retired Invocations. 0 were either: read-only replicas and are not verifiably latent, or dc's no longer replicating this nc. 0 had no latency information (Win2K DC).
DC=Qtit,DC=com
Latency information for 20 entries in the vector were ignored.
20 were retired Invocations. 0 were either: read-only replicas and are not verifiably latent, or dc's no longer replicating this nc. 0 had no latency information (Win2K DC).
* Replication Site Latency Check
......................... PRIMARYDC passed test Replications
Starting test: RidManager
* Available RID Pool for the Domain is 14607 to 1073741823
* SecondAD.Qtit.com is the RID Master
* DsBind with RID Master was successful
* rIDAllocationPool is 14107 to 14606
* rIDPreviousAllocationPool is 14107 to 14606
* rIDNextRID: 14124
......................... PRIMARYDC passed test RidManager
Starting test: Services
* Checking Service: EventSystem
* Checking Service: RpcSs
* Checking Service: NTDS
* Checking Service: DnsCache
* Checking Service: NtFrs
* Checking Service: IsmServ
* Checking Service: kdc
* Checking Service: SamSs
* Checking Service: LanmanServer
* Checking Service: LanmanWorkstation
* Checking Service: w32time
* Checking Service: NETLOGON
......................... PRIMARYDC passed test Services
Starting test: SystemLog
* The System Event log test
A warning event occurred. EventID: 0x0000A001
Time Generated: 03/06/2014 16:04:05
Event String:
The Security System could not establish a secured connection with the server ldap/PRIMARYDC.Qtit.com/[email protected]. No authentication protocol was available.
An error event occurred. EventID: 0x0000041F
Time Generated: 03/06/2014 16:06:35
Event String:
The processing of Group Policy failed. Windows could not resolve the computer name. This could be caused by one of more of the following:
a) Name Resolution failure on the current domain controller.
b) Active Directory Replication Latency (an account created on another domain controller has not replicated to the current domain controller).
An error event occurred. EventID: 0x0000041F
Time Generated: 03/06/2014 16:11:36
Event String:
The processing of Group Policy failed. Windows could not resolve the computer name. This could be caused by one of more of the following:
a) Name Resolution failure on the current domain controller.
b) Active Directory Replication Latency (an account created on another domain controller has not replicated to the current domain controller).
An error event occurred. EventID: 0x0000041F
Time Generated: 03/06/2014 16:16:38
Event String:
The processing of Group Policy failed. Windows could not resolve the computer name. This could be caused by one of more of the following:
a) Name Resolution failure on the current domain controller.
b) Active Directory Replication Latency (an account created on another domain controller has not replicated to the current domain controller).
An error event occurred. EventID: 0x0000041F
Time Generated: 03/06/2014 16:21:39
Event String:
The processing of Group Policy failed. Windows could not resolve the computer name. This could be caused by one of more of the following:
a) Name Resolution failure on the current domain controller.
b) Active Directory Replication Latency (an account created on another domain controller has not replicated to the current domain controller).
An error event occurred. EventID: 0x0000041F
Time Generated: 03/06/2014 16:26:41
Event String:
The processing of Group Policy failed. Windows could not resolve the computer name. This could be caused by one of more of the following:
a) Name Resolution failure on the current domain controller.
b) Active Directory Replication Latency (an account created on another domain controller has not replicated to the current domain controller).
An error event occurred. EventID: 0x00000457
Time Generated: 03/06/2014 16:30:46
Event String:
Driver TOSHIBA e-STUDIO16/20/25 PCL 6 required for printer TOSHIBA e-STUDIO16/20/25 PCL 6 is unknown. Contact the administrator to install the driver before you log in again.
An error event occurred. EventID: 0x00000457
Time Generated: 03/06/2014 16:30:48
Event String:
Driver Microsoft XPS Document Writer v4 required for printer Microsoft XPS Document Writer is unknown. Contact the administrator to install the driver before you log in again.
An error event occurred. EventID: 0x00000457
Time Generated: 03/06/2014 16:30:49
Event String:
Driver Send to Microsoft OneNote 15 Driver required for printer Send To OneNote 2013 is unknown. Contact the administrator to install the driver before you log in again.
An error event occurred. EventID: 0x00000457
Time Generated: 03/06/2014 16:31:14
Event String:
Driver Send to Microsoft OneNote 15 Driver required for printer Send To OneNote 2013 is unknown. Contact the administrator to install the driver before you log in again.
An error event occurred. EventID: 0x00000457
Time Generated: 03/06/2014 16:31:16
Event String:
Driver Microsoft XPS Document Writer v4 required for printer Microsoft XPS Document Writer is unknown. Contact the administrator to install the driver before you log in again.
An error event occurred. EventID: 0x00000457
Time Generated: 03/06/2014 16:31:16
Event String:
Driver WebEx Document Loader required for printer WebEx Document Loader is unknown. Contact the administrator to install the driver before you log in again.
An error event occurred. EventID: 0x0000041F
Time Generated: 03/06/2014 16:31:42
Event String:
The processing of Group Policy failed. Windows could not resolve the computer name. This could be caused by one of more of the following:
a) Name Resolution failure on the current domain controller.
b) Active Directory Replication Latency (an account created on another domain controller has not replicated to the current domain controller).
......................... PRIMARYDC failed test SystemLog
Test omitted by user request: Topology
Test omitted by user request: VerifyEnterpriseReferences
Starting test: VerifyReferences
The system object reference (serverReference)
CN=PRIMARYDC,OU=Domain Controllers,DC=Qtit,DC=com and backlink on
CN=PRIMARYDC,CN=Servers,CN=Default-First-Site-Name,CN=Sites,CN=Configuration,DC=Qtit,DC=com
are correct.
The system object reference (serverReferenceBL)
CN=PRIMARYDC,CN=Domain System Volume (SYSVOL share),CN=File Replication Service,CN=System,DC=Qtit,DC=com
and backlink on
CN=NTDS Settings,CN=PRIMARYDC,CN=Servers,CN=Default-First-Site-Name,CN=Sites,CN=Configuration,DC=Qtit,DC=com
are correct.
The system object reference (frsComputerReferenceBL)
CN=PRIMARYDC,CN=Domain System Volume (SYSVOL share),CN=File Replication Service,CN=System,DC=Qtit,DC=com
and backlink on CN=PRIMARYDC,OU=Domain Controllers,DC=Qtit,DC=com are
correct.
......................... PRIMARYDC passed test VerifyReferences
Test omitted by user request: VerifyReplicas
Test omitted by user request: DNS
Test omitted by user request: DNS
Running partition tests on : ForestDnsZones
Starting test: CheckSDRefDom
......................... ForestDnsZones passed test CheckSDRefDom
Starting test: CrossRefValidation
......................... ForestDnsZones passed test
CrossRefValidation
Running partition tests on : DomainDnsZones
Starting test: CheckSDRefDom
......................... DomainDnsZones passed test CheckSDRefDom
Starting test: CrossRefValidation
......................... DomainDnsZones passed test
CrossRefValidation
Running partition tests on : Schema
Starting test: CheckSDRefDom
......................... Schema passed test CheckSDRefDom
Starting test: CrossRefValidation
......................... Schema passed test CrossRefValidation
Running partition tests on : Configuration
Starting test: CheckSDRefDom
......................... Configuration passed test CheckSDRefDom
Starting test: CrossRefValidation
......................... Configuration passed test CrossRefValidation
Running partition tests on : Qtit
Starting test: CheckSDRefDom
......................... Qtit passed test CheckSDRefDom
Starting test: CrossRefValidation
......................... Qtit passed test CrossRefValidation
Running enterprise tests on : Qtit.com
Test omitted by user request: DNS
Test omitted by user request: DNS
Starting test: LocatorCheck
GC Name: \\PRIMARYDC.Qtit.com
Locator Flags: 0xe00031fc
PDC Name: \\SecondAD.Qtit.com
Locator Flags: 0xe00001bd
Time Server Name: \\PRIMARYDC.Qtit.com
Locator Flags: 0xe00031fc
Preferred Time Server Name: \\PRIMARYDC.Qtit.com
Locator Flags: 0xe00031fc
KDC Name: \\PRIMARYDC.Qtit.com
Locator Flags: 0xe00031fc
......................... Qtit.com passed test LocatorCheck
Starting test: Intersite
Skipping site Default-First-Site-Name, this site is outside the scope
provided by the command line arguments provided.
......................... Qtit.com passed test Intersite
repadmin /showrepl Result
******************************8
==== INBOUND NEIGHBORS ===================================
DC=Qtit,DC=com
Default-First-Site-Name\SECONDAD via RPC
DSA object GUID: c5ef6e17-77f0-43f6-8d39-5497c563f
Last attempt @ 2014-03-06 16:41:04 was successful.
CN=Configuration,DC=Qtit,DC=com
Default-First-Site-Name\SECONDAD via RPC
DSA object GUID: c5ef6e17-77f0-43f6-8d39-5497c563f
Last attempt @ 2014-03-06 16:41:39 was successful.
CN=Schema,CN=Configuration,DC=Qtit,DC=com
Default-First-Site-Name\SECONDAD via RPC
DSA object GUID: c5ef6e17-77f0-43f6-8d39-5497c563f
Last attempt @ 2014-03-06 15:53:01 was successful.
DC=DomainDnsZones,DC=Qtit,DC=com
Default-First-Site-Name\SECONDAD via RPC
DSA object GUID: c5ef6e17-77f0-43f6-8d39-5497c563f
Last attempt @ 2014-03-06 16:27:31 was successful.
DC=ForestDnsZones,DC=Qtit,DC=com
Default-First-Site-Name\SECONDAD via RPC
DSA object GUID: c5ef6e17-77f0-43f6-8d39-5497c563f
Last attempt @ 2014-03-06 15:53:01 was successful.
I try to down the DC 2003 and access \\Qtit.com it success open the syslog on DC 2008
Any help or adviceHi,
Were there other error codes logged in Event Viewer?
Regarding Event ID 1055, the following article can be referred to for troubleshooting.
Event ID 1055 — Group Policy Preprocessing (Security)
http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/cc727272(v=ws.10).aspx
Based on the report you posted, this issue may be related to FRS replication service. As a result, we can use ntfrsutl tool to check whether the replication service is healthy.
Regarding this point, the following articles can be referred to for more information.
Troubleshooting File Replication Service
http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/bb727056.aspx
Ntfrsutl
http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/hh875636.aspx
In addition, we can also try doing a non-authoritative Sysvol restore on Windows Server 2008 DC to see whether the issue persists.
Using the BurFlags registry key to reinitialize File Replication Service replica sets
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/290762/en-us
Hope it helps.
Best regards,
Frank Shen -
The processing of Group Policy failed. Windows attempted to read the file...
Hello all-
I am currently trying to configure group policy (specifically folder redirects) from a new Windows Server 2008 in my home... the server acts as both an AD DS and file server for 4 client computers, all running Windows Vista Ultimate.
Here are the steps I am currently taking:
I create a new Group Policy called All Users and Computers and apply it to the All Users and Computers OU, which contains exactly what it says (all users and computers in the domain).
I verify that a new folder was created in \\<FQDN>\sysvol\<FQDN>\Policies. The new folder created is named {6479C8E0-3134-4B4F-B047-7ADD51684684}
I change the GPO Enforced setting to Enforced.
I attempt to use the gpupdate command to see if the group policy can be updated successfully. In a command prompt, I type gpupdate <enter>. I receive the message 'Updating Policy...' then after about 15 seconds the message 'User Policy update has completed successfully.'
I keep the cmd window open. After about 10 seconds another message apperas which says "Computer policy could not be updated successfully. The following errors were encountered: The processing of Group Policy failed. Windows attempted to read the file \\<FQDN>\sysvol\<FQDN>\Policies\{6AC1786C-016F-11D2-945F-00C04Fb984F9}\gpt.ini from a domain controller and was not successful. Group Policy settings may not be applied until this event is resolved. This issue may be transient and could be caused by one or more of the following:
a) Name Resolution/Network Connectivity to the current domain controller.
b) File Replication Service Latency (a file created on another domain controller has not replicated to the current domain controller).
c) The Distributed File System (DFS) client has been disabled.
To diagnose the failure, review the event log or invoke gpmc.msc to access information about Group Policy results."
I confirm that the error code is #3 using the Event Log, "The system cannot find the file specificed"
Of course the system cannot find the file specified because the folder does not exist in the sysvol folder. I am wondering why Windows is trying to read from this location when it does not exist, and is not the new group policy I created! I have no other group policies linked or enforced to any other OU/Domain/etc. Any help resolving this issue would be greatly appreciated.Hello all and thanks for the help. First a few things:
I understand that the DC should not be running RRAS, but this a simple server being used in aa home environment by 4 users and getting another server just for RRAS would be overkill.
Secondly, I currently have it so that while the router is handling DHCP, I have reserved a fixed IP for the server, so it always has 192.168.1.100. If I were to use the server as the DHCP, what would my hardware configuration have to look like? I currently have the router plugged into the ISP modem, and then server plugged into the router. All other clients connect to the router wirelessly.
Here's the dcdiag output. I tried dcdiag /fix but to no avail.
Directory Server Diagnosis
Performing initial setup:
Trying to find home server...
* Verifying that the local machine KELLERDCFS, is a Directory Server.
Home Server = KELLERDCFS
* Connecting to directory service on server KELLERDCFS.
* Identified AD Forest.
Collecting AD specific global data
* Collecting site info.
Calling ldap_search_init_page(hld,CN=Sites,CN=Configuration,DC=keller-pa,DC=net,LDAP_SCOPE_SUBTREE,(objectCategory=ntDSSiteSettings),.......
The previous call succeeded
Iterating through the sites
Looking at base site object: CN=NTDS Site Settings,CN=Default-First-Site-Name,CN=Sites,CN=Configuration,DC=keller-pa,DC=net
Getting ISTG and options for the site
* Identifying all servers.
Calling ldap_search_init_page(hld,CN=Sites,CN=Configuration,DC=keller-pa,DC=net,LDAP_SCOPE_SUBTREE,(objectClass=ntDSDsa),.......
The previous call succeeded....
The previous call succeeded
Iterating through the list of servers
Getting information for the server CN=NTDS Settings,CN=KELLERDCFS,CN=Servers,CN=Default-First-Site-Name,CN=Sites,CN=Configuration,DC=keller-pa,DC=net
objectGuid obtained
InvocationID obtained
dnsHostname obtained
site info obtained
All the info for the server collected
* Identifying all NC cross-refs.
* Found 1 DC(s). Testing 1 of them.
Done gathering initial info.
Doing initial required tests
Testing server: Default-First-Site-Name\KELLERDCFS
Starting test: Connectivity
* Active Directory LDAP Services Check
Determining IP4 connectivity
Determining IP6 connectivity
* Active Directory RPC Services Check
......................... KELLERDCFS passed test Connectivity
Doing primary tests
Testing server: Default-First-Site-Name\KELLERDCFS
Starting test: Advertising
The DC KELLERDCFS is advertising itself as a DC and having a DS.
The DC KELLERDCFS is advertising as an LDAP server
The DC KELLERDCFS is advertising as having a writeable directory
The DC KELLERDCFS is advertising as a Key Distribution Center
The DC KELLERDCFS is advertising as a time server
The DS KELLERDCFS is advertising as a GC.
......................... KELLERDCFS passed test Advertising
Test omitted by user request: CheckSecurityError
Test omitted by user request: CutoffServers
Starting test: FrsEvent
* The File Replication Service Event log test
Skip the test because the event log File Replication Service does not exist.
......................... KELLERDCFS passed test FrsEvent
Starting test: DFSREvent
The DFS Replication Event Log.
......................... KELLERDCFS passed test DFSREvent
Starting test: SysVolCheck
* The File Replication Service SYSVOL ready test
File Replication Service's SYSVOL is ready
......................... KELLERDCFS passed test SysVolCheck
Starting test: KccEvent
* The KCC Event log test
Found no KCC errors in "Directory Service" Event log in the last 15 minutes.
......................... KELLERDCFS passed test KccEvent
Starting test: KnowsOfRoleHolders
Role Schema Owner = CN=NTDS Settings,CN=KELLERDCFS,CN=Servers,CN=Default-First-Site-Name,CN=Sites,CN=Configuration,DC=keller-pa,DC=net
Role Domain Owner = CN=NTDS Settings,CN=KELLERDCFS,CN=Servers,CN=Default-First-Site-Name,CN=Sites,CN=Configuration,DC=keller-pa,DC=net
Role PDC Owner = CN=NTDS Settings,CN=KELLERDCFS,CN=Servers,CN=Default-First-Site-Name,CN=Sites,CN=Configuration,DC=keller-pa,DC=net
Role Rid Owner = CN=NTDS Settings,CN=KELLERDCFS,CN=Servers,CN=Default-First-Site-Name,CN=Sites,CN=Configuration,DC=keller-pa,DC=net
Role Infrastructure Update Owner = CN=NTDS Settings,CN=KELLERDCFS,CN=Servers,CN=Default-First-Site-Name,CN=Sites,CN=Configuration,DC=keller-pa,DC=net
......................... KELLERDCFS passed test KnowsOfRoleHolders
Starting test: MachineAccount
Checking machine account for DC KELLERDCFS on DC KELLERDCFS.
* SPN found :LDAP/KELLERDCFS.keller-pa.net/keller-pa.net
* SPN found :LDAP/KELLERDCFS.keller-pa.net
* SPN found :LDAP/KELLERDCFS
* SPN found :LDAP/KELLERDCFS.keller-pa.net/KELLER-PA
* SPN found :LDAP/42268b36-801f-4a6d-b162-34f3b01e04bb._msdcs.keller-pa.net
* SPN found :E3514235-4B06-11D1-AB04-00C04FC2DCD2/42268b36-801f-4a6d-b162-34f3b01e04bb/keller-pa.net
* SPN found :HOST/KELLERDCFS.keller-pa.net/keller-pa.net
* SPN found :HOST/KELLERDCFS.keller-pa.net
* SPN found :HOST/KELLERDCFS
* SPN found :HOST/KELLERDCFS.keller-pa.net/KELLER-PA
* SPN found :GC/KELLERDCFS.keller-pa.net/keller-pa.net
......................... KELLERDCFS passed test MachineAccount
Starting test: NCSecDesc
* Security Permissions check for all NC's on DC KELLERDCFS.
* Security Permissions Check for
DC=ForestDnsZones,DC=keller-pa,DC=net
(NDNC,Version 3)
* Security Permissions Check for
DC=DomainDnsZones,DC=keller-pa,DC=net
(NDNC,Version 3)
* Security Permissions Check for
CN=Schema,CN=Configuration,DC=keller-pa,DC=net
(Schema,Version 3)
* Security Permissions Check for
CN=Configuration,DC=keller-pa,DC=net
(Configuration,Version 3)
* Security Permissions Check for
DC=keller-pa,DC=net
(Domain,Version 3)
......................... KELLERDCFS passed test NCSecDesc
Starting test: NetLogons
* Network Logons Privileges Check
Verified share \\KELLERDCFS\netlogon
Verified share \\KELLERDCFS\sysvol
......................... KELLERDCFS passed test NetLogons
Starting test: ObjectsReplicated
KELLERDCFS is in domain DC=keller-pa,DC=net
Checking for CN=KELLERDCFS,OU=Domain Controllers,DC=keller-pa,DC=net in domain DC=keller-pa,DC=net on 1 servers
Object is up-to-date on all servers.
Checking for CN=NTDS Settings,CN=KELLERDCFS,CN=Servers,CN=Default-First-Site-Name,CN=Sites,CN=Configuration,DC=keller-pa,DC=net in domain CN=Configuration,DC=keller-pa,DC=net on 1 servers
Object is up-to-date on all servers.
......................... KELLERDCFS passed test ObjectsReplicated
Test omitted by user request: OutboundSecureChannels
Starting test: Replications
* Replications Check
* Replication Latency Check
......................... KELLERDCFS passed test Replications
Starting test: RidManager
* Available RID Pool for the Domain is 1600 to 1073741823
* KELLERDCFS.keller-pa.net is the RID Master
* DsBind with RID Master was successful
* rIDAllocationPool is 1100 to 1599
* rIDPreviousAllocationPool is 1100 to 1599
* rIDNextRID: 1111
......................... KELLERDCFS passed test RidManager
Starting test: Services
* Checking Service: EventSystem
* Checking Service: RpcSs
* Checking Service: NTDS
* Checking Service: DnsCache
* Checking Service: DFSR
* Checking Service: IsmServ
* Checking Service: kdc
* Checking Service: SamSs
* Checking Service: LanmanServer
* Checking Service: LanmanWorkstation
* Checking Service: w32time
* Checking Service: NETLOGON
......................... KELLERDCFS passed test Services
Starting test: SystemLog
* The System Event log test
An Error Event occurred. EventID: 0x00000422
Time Generated: 07/07/2009 17:53:59
Event String:
The processing of Group Policy failed. Windows attempted to read the file \\keller-pa.net\sysvol\keller-pa.net\Policies\{6AC1786C-016F-11D2-945F-00C04FB984F9}\gpt.ini from a domain controller and was not successful. Group Policy settings may not be applied until this event is resolved. This issue may be transient and could be caused by one or more of the following:
a) Name Resolution/Network Connectivity to the current domain controller.
b) File Replication Service Latency (a file created on another domain controller has not replicated to the current domain controller).
c) The Distributed File System (DFS) client has been disabled.
An Error Event occurred. EventID: 0x00000422
Time Generated: 07/07/2009 17:59:02
Event String:
The processing of Group Policy failed. Windows attempted to read the file \\keller-pa.net\sysvol\keller-pa.net\Policies\{6AC1786C-016F-11D2-945F-00C04FB984F9}\gpt.ini from a domain controller and was not successful. Group Policy settings may not be applied until this event is resolved. This issue may be transient and could be caused by one or more of the following:
a) Name Resolution/Network Connectivity to the current domain controller.
b) File Replication Service Latency (a file created on another domain controller has not replicated to the current domain controller).
c) The Distributed File System (DFS) client has been disabled.
An Error Event occurred. EventID: 0x00000422
Time Generated: 07/07/2009 18:04:04
Event String:
The processing of Group Policy failed. Windows attempted to read the file \\keller-pa.net\sysvol\keller-pa.net\Policies\{6AC1786C-016F-11D2-945F-00C04FB984F9}\gpt.ini from a domain controller and was not successful. Group Policy settings may not be applied until this event is resolved. This issue may be transient and could be caused by one or more of the following:
a) Name Resolution/Network Connectivity to the current domain controller.
b) File Replication Service Latency (a file created on another domain controller has not replicated to the current domain controller).
c) The Distributed File System (DFS) client has been disabled.
An Error Event occurred. EventID: 0x00000422
Time Generated: 07/07/2009 18:09:06
Event String:
The processing of Group Policy failed. Windows attempted to read the file \\keller-pa.net\sysvol\keller-pa.net\Policies\{6AC1786C-016F-11D2-945F-00C04FB984F9}\gpt.ini from a domain controller and was not successful. Group Policy settings may not be applied until this event is resolved. This issue may be transient and could be caused by one or more of the following:
a) Name Resolution/Network Connectivity to the current domain controller.
b) File Replication Service Latency (a file created on another domain controller has not replicated to the current domain controller).
c) The Distributed File System (DFS) client has been disabled.
An Error Event occurred. EventID: 0x00000422
Time Generated: 07/07/2009 18:14:08
Event String:
The processing of Group Policy failed. Windows attempted to read the file \\keller-pa.net\sysvol\keller-pa.net\Policies\{6AC1786C-016F-11D2-945F-00C04FB984F9}\gpt.ini from a domain controller and was not successful. Group Policy settings may not be applied until this event is resolved. This issue may be transient and could be caused by one or more of the following:
a) Name Resolution/Network Connectivity to the current domain controller.
b) File Replication Service Latency (a file created on another domain controller has not replicated to the current domain controller).
c) The Distributed File System (DFS) client has been disabled.
An Error Event occurred. EventID: 0x00000422
Time Generated: 07/07/2009 18:19:10
Event String:
The processing of Group Policy failed. Windows attempted to read the file \\keller-pa.net\sysvol\keller-pa.net\Policies\{6AC1786C-016F-11D2-945F-00C04FB984F9}\gpt.ini from a domain controller and was not successful. Group Policy settings may not be applied until this event is resolved. This issue may be transient and could be caused by one or more of the following:
a) Name Resolution/Network Connectivity to the current domain controller.
b) File Replication Service Latency (a file created on another domain controller has not replicated to the current domain controller).
c) The Distributed File System (DFS) client has been disabled.
An Error Event occurred. EventID: 0x00000422
Time Generated: 07/07/2009 18:24:12
Event String:
The processing of Group Policy failed. Windows attempted to read the file \\keller-pa.net\sysvol\keller-pa.net\Policies\{6AC1786C-016F-11D2-945F-00C04FB984F9}\gpt.ini from a domain controller and was not successful. Group Policy settings may not be applied until this event is resolved. This issue may be transient and could be caused by one or more of the following:
a) Name Resolution/Network Connectivity to the current domain controller.
b) File Replication Service Latency (a file created on another domain controller has not replicated to the current domain controller).
c) The Distributed File System (DFS) client has been disabled.
An Error Event occurred. EventID: 0x00000422
Time Generated: 07/07/2009 18:29:15
Event String:
The processing of Group Policy failed. Windows attempted to read the file \\keller-pa.net\sysvol\keller-pa.net\Policies\{6AC1786C-016F-11D2-945F-00C04FB984F9}\gpt.ini from a domain controller and was not successful. Group Policy settings may not be applied until this event is resolved. This issue may be transient and could be caused by one or more of the following:
a) Name Resolution/Network Connectivity to the current domain controller.
b) File Replication Service Latency (a file created on another domain controller has not replicated to the current domain controller).
c) The Distributed File System (DFS) client has been disabled.
An Error Event occurred. EventID: 0x00000422
Time Generated: 07/07/2009 18:34:17
Event String:
The processing of Group Policy failed. Windows attempted to read the file \\keller-pa.net\sysvol\keller-pa.net\Policies\{6AC1786C-016F-11D2-945F-00C04FB984F9}\gpt.ini from a domain controller and was not successful. Group Policy settings may not be applied until this event is resolved. This issue may be transient and could be caused by one or more of the following:
a) Name Resolution/Network Connectivity to the current domain controller.
b) File Replication Service Latency (a file created on another domain controller has not replicated to the current domain controller).
c) The Distributed File System (DFS) client has been disabled.
An Error Event occurred. EventID: 0x00000422
Time Generated: 07/07/2009 18:39:19
Event String:
The processing of Group Policy failed. Windows attempted to read the file \\keller-pa.net\sysvol\keller-pa.net\Policies\{6AC1786C-016F-11D2-945F-00C04FB984F9}\gpt.ini from a domain controller and was not successful. Group Policy settings may not be applied until this event is resolved. This issue may be transient and could be caused by one or more of the following:
a) Name Resolution/Network Connectivity to the current domain controller.
b) File Replication Service Latency (a file created on another domain controller has not replicated to the current domain controller).
c) The Distributed File System (DFS) client has been disabled.
The processing of Group Policy failed. Windows attempted to read the file \\keller-pa.net\sysvol\keller-pa.net\Policies\{6AC1786C-016F-11D2-945F-00C04FB984F9}\gpt.ini from a domain controller and was not successful. Group Policy settings may not be applied until this event is resolved. This issue may be transient and could be caused by one or more of the following:
a) Name Resolution/Network Connectivity to the current domain controller.
b) File Replication Service Latency (a file created on another domain controller has not replicated to the current domain controller).
c) The Distributed File System (DFS) client has been disabled.
An Error Event occurred. EventID: 0x00000422
Time Generated: 07/07/2009 18:49:23
Event String:
The processing of Group Policy failed. Windows attempted to read the file \\keller-pa.net\sysvol\keller-pa.net\Policies\{6AC1786C-016F-11D2-945F-00C04FB984F9}\gpt.ini from a domain controller and was not successful. Group Policy settings may not be applied until this event is resolved. This issue may be transient and could be caused by one or more of the following:
a) Name Resolution/Network Connectivity to the current domain controller.
b) File Replication Service Latency (a file created on another domain controller has not replicated to the current domain controller).
c) The Distributed File System (DFS) client has been disabled.
......................... KELLERDCFS failed test SystemLog
Test omitted by user request: Topology
Test omitted by user request: VerifyEnterpriseReferences
Starting test: VerifyReferences
The system object reference (serverReference)
CN=KELLERDCFS,OU=Domain Controllers,DC=keller-pa,DC=net and backlink
on
CN=KELLERDCFS,CN=Servers,CN=Default-First-Site-Name,CN=Sites,CN=Configuration,DC=keller-pa,DC=net
are correct.
The system object reference (serverReferenceBL)
CN=KELLERDCFS,CN=Topology,CN=Domain System Volume,CN=DFSR-GlobalSettings,CN=System,DC=keller-pa,DC=net
and backlink on
CN=NTDS Settings,CN=KELLERDCFS,CN=Servers,CN=Default-First-Site-Name,CN=Sites,CN=Configuration,DC=keller-pa,DC=net
are correct.
......................... KELLERDCFS passed test VerifyReferences
Test omitted by user request: VerifyReplicas
Test omitted by user request: DNS
Test omitted by user request: DNS
Running partition tests on : ForestDnsZones
Starting test: CheckSDRefDom
......................... ForestDnsZones passed test CheckSDRefDom
Starting test: CrossRefValidation
......................... ForestDnsZones passed test
CrossRefValidation
Running partition tests on : DomainDnsZones
Starting test: CheckSDRefDom
......................... DomainDnsZones passed test CheckSDRefDom
Starting test: CrossRefValidation
......................... DomainDnsZones passed test
CrossRefValidation
Running partition tests on : Schema
Starting test: CheckSDRefDom
......................... Schema passed test CheckSDRefDom
Starting test: CrossRefValidation
......................... Schema passed test CrossRefValidation
Running partition tests on : Configuration
Starting test: CheckSDRefDom
......................... Configuration passed test CheckSDRefDom
Starting test: CrossRefValidation
......................... Configuration passed test CrossRefValidation
Running partition tests on : keller-pa
Starting test: CheckSDRefDom
......................... keller-pa passed test CheckSDRefDom
Starting test: CrossRefValidation
......................... keller-pa passed test CrossRefValidation
Running enterprise tests on : keller-pa.net
Test omitted by user request: DNS
Test omitted by user request: DNS
Starting test: LocatorCheck
GC Name: \\KELLERDCFS.keller-pa.net
Locator Flags: 0xe00013fd
PDC Name: \\KELLERDCFS.keller-pa.net
Locator Flags: 0xe00013fd
Time Server Name: \\KELLERDCFS.keller-pa.net
Locator Flags: 0xe00013fd
Preferred Time Server Name: \\KELLERDCFS.keller-pa.net
Locator Flags: 0xe00013fd
KDC Name: \\KELLERDCFS.keller-pa.net
Locator Flags: 0xe00013fd
......................... keller-pa.net passed test LocatorCheck
Starting test: Intersite
Skipping site Default-First-Site-Name, this site is outside the scope
provided by the command line arguments provided.
......................... keller-pa.net passed test Intersite
Here's the nslookup from Vista client:
Microsoft Windows [Version 6.0.6001]
Copyright (c) 2006 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.
C:\Users\Andrew>nslookup KELLERDCFS
Server: UnKnown
Address: 192.168.1.100
Name: KELLERDCFS.keller-pa.net
Addresses: 192.168.1.150
192.168.1.100
C:\Users\Andrew>
Thanks again! -
How to configure RDS to let a specific RDS group access a specific RDS server (no VDI or farm) ?
Hi there,
We have one domain with 40 sites. On each site is a RODC, wich also has RDS. (RDS the old way, no broker installed)
The RODC's are 2008R2 and 2012R2 servers.
Everything works fine, however everyone can access all servers as a straight forward RDS user (no VDI).
Everyone is in the build in group for remote user.
I'd like to have people that work on ServerA only are able to contact serverA for RDS.
B on B, C on C and so on ... This for all 40 sites.
I made a policy for each site allowing RDS_A to access server A and so on. Is this the right way to do it, or can I do it having less GPO's ? I need 40 right now!!! Linking the policy to the right OU, containing the specific server.
Something is still wrong, because other people still can access serverA.
I get into it, but maybe I'm doing it wrong, so please give me some advice :)
Thanks,
Ben.
Ben van der MeerHi Ben,
Thank you for posting in Windows Server Forum.
You can achieve this through group policy but you can do one thing. You can create one group for one server (Suppose group A for server A, B for B, so on). After creating that group add particular user to that group and apply the group policy setting on that
group for particular group.
The group policy which can apply is “Allow users to connect remotely using Remote Desktop Services” under below mention path.
Computer Configuration\Policies\Administrative Templates\Windows Components\Remote Desktop Services\Remote Desktop Session Host\Connections
More information.
http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ee791922(v=ws.10).aspx
Hope it helps!
Thanks.
Dharmesh Solanki
TechNet Community Support -
Error Message when logging on "The Group Policy Client service failed the logon. Access is denied"
Since the move to Windows 7 we have started getting this error above when people login at random times and on random machines, at first we thought it was only a select few users, but now it seems to have occurred to about 20 different Staff members working
at the school. Also of those 20 odd users it has happened to them on a few occasions.
What we know
We know this problem is only occurring to staff with Roaming Profiles, it seems like somehow the profile is not Synchronizing with the Servers File Share that houses the profiles, which causes the NTUSER.DAT file to become corrupt and go from being around
2 – 3 MBs to 256KB (In all cases where a user has had this issue there NTUSER.DAT file has been 256KB)
Current Resolution to the problem
When a staff member contact us with this problem, we fortunately have Previous Versions working on the profiles folder on the server, so we are able to restore their NTUSER.DAT file from 1 to 2 days before it became corrupt, which then seems to allow them
to log on fine
What we have tried so far & suggested so far
After some research on Google, we found the following thread on EduGeek
http://www.edugeek.net/forums/windows-7/78733-windows-7-user-profile-failed-error-again.html#post700415
Which suggested that the problem may lay within registry, so we implemented the Script that was posted on the website, however this has not seemed to make any difference
In the early stages when only 5 – 10 staff seemed to be having the problem, we believed the issue could be with just certain AD accounts. It had not seemed to happen to any recently created AD accounts so we thought it could be a corrupt attribute on
the user so we delete one of the staff AD accounts that had the problem and creating a brand new one, however within about 2 – 3 weeks that staff member had the issue occur again
Leading on from point two, we also thought the problem could be with people using multiple computers, logging on in 2 places and not logging off properly, but unfortunately the staff member referred to in point 2 only uses the one computer in reception.
Another potential cause that we figured might be the route of the problem, was it could be specific computers that are not communicating properly with the server, which could be causing this problem to occur, but we have no real way of testing this,
as the staff generally log onto 3 – 4 different computers throughout the day and in different location
We log a call with EE and they just pointed us to various websites that we had already checked and wasn’t much help.
In Summary
This error has now occurred with about 20 members of staff, we currently only use Windows 7 at our Senior School & Moving to Windows 7 at our Prep School in the Summer
holidays, we would like to find out the route of this problem ideally before then, as we could potentially be doubling the amount of staff with the problem after the move. Has anyone else seen this problem or have a brain wave on how to solve it?
Regards
AndyHi Dudleya,
First of all ,I would suggest to check the permissions of the NTUSER.DAT registry hive .Here is a link for reference :
The Group Policy Client service failed the logon. Access is denied(Juke Chou`s answer)
https://social.technet.microsoft.com/Forums/windows/en-US/8c0054a3-35be-4fc4-839c-e2176613eb23/the-group-policy-client-service-failed-the-logon-access-is-denied?forum=w7itpronetworking
Please refer to this link and add the registry keys to have a check .Please backup the registry keys before you made modifications to them.
The Group Policy Client Service Failed The Logon In Windows 8(It should also work on windows 7 )
http://www.thewindowsclub.com/fix-group-policy-client-service-failed-logon-windows-8
If the issue persists ,we can refer to this link to troubleshoot this issue .
Troubleshoot User Profiles with Events(It should also be applied to windows 7 )
https://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/jj649075.aspx
NOTE: This response contains a reference to a third party World Wide Web site. Microsoft is providing this information as a convenience to you. Microsoft does not control these sites and has not tested any software or information found on these sites.
Best regards
Maybe you are looking for
-
Keep My Email How Does It Work With Outlook
I have two internet service providers, Verizon and another small local DSL/Phone provider. I have kept the Verizon for several years because neither has very good bandwidth and my household bogs down without 2 mediocre services, and for the email, w
-
I cn't open my E-Mails with a download or a video It read's The movie file isent recognized
-
Hello, I have a problem with logging on multiple servers at the same time. I would like to have a single file with every log formated like this : "yyyyMMdd HH:mm:ss - $Env:ComputerName - result of the command" To know what computer is doing what, I a
-
Dear Moderator, This particular user is promoting hatred against a community with his abusive post here. Also he justifies it when warned to remove the content. Re: Please clarify these doubts........ I hope the modeator takes firm action in the best
-
HT204382 I have no sound with avi
I have no sound with avi file