Logical Partitioning -How much %age improvement.

Hello All,
I want to know if we use Logical partitioning for cube then how much %age performance will be improve and how about its depends on loaded data into the cube.
Q1:Logical partitioning of cubes - How much % of performance can be expected.
Q2:How much % of performance improvement can be expected if say no. of records in cube is half the current no. of records.
Thanks in advance,
Bandana.

Bandana,
I would say that the question is incorrect ..( Carl Sagan..? )
First - the percentage improvement depends on the amount of data - if my cube has 100 records and I do a logical partition I will not see any improvement - but then ramp up the numbers to 1 billion records - I see very significant improvements..
Lets say your cube has data for 2010 and 2011 and you want to logically separate out the data . Typically logical partitions would mean separating out the data into separate cubes by year / country etc - any partition that is not using the default partitioning of 0FISCPER / 0CALMONTH etc...
If this is not what you are looking at or if I am wrong - please correct me here...
Now if you split your cube into two parts - one cube for 2010 and one for 2011 - the time required to access the data in the 2010 cube decreases - because it has a cube of its own - this is the benefit you get in terms of data access times - but then this is not going to be a 100% improvement because you have a cube for each year... it depends to a large extent on the query also - but in almost all cases you will have a performance benefit.
I am not able to understand your second question.

Similar Messages

  • How much improvement can I get from this upgrade?

    I'm planning to upgrade my system and I'm looking for suggestions on my plan. My current system is:
    Intel Core i7 3770
    Radeon HD 7570
    500Gb SSD for everything
    1tb HDD of extra storage
    10Gb of RAM
    Rendering is slow and a lot of dropped frames occurs when editing 4k in Premiere Pro CC. And my graphics drivers crashes when push the system too hard
    This is my parts list for my future build:
    Intel Core i7 5820k(will be overclocked)
    Asus x99 deluxe motherboard
    16Gb ddr4 RAM
    Asus STRIX GTX 970
    240Gb SSD
    the 500Gb SSD and 1tb hard drive will be put I this build.
    I have a few questions. How much of a performance improvement(faster renders, lower dropped frames etc.)would I see with this build? If I just upgrade the GPU, an SSD and increase the RAM size to 16Gb to my original system, how much performance improvement would I see? The upgrade to the 5820k will cost $1000 and I'm wondering if I can upgrade everything else except for the CPU, motherboard and ddr4 RAM?
    Thanks in advance!

    Ok, I'll chime in with an opinion at least.
    Wait on the new book. Do a $90 ram/$29 OS upgrade and give up on spending money on a HDD.
    Ive been looking at upgrades to speed up my laptop till I can afford a new one and have decided to wait 12months till SSD prices drop to $1.75-$2.50/GB. I think I will windup with a faster computer than anything that will come out for another 12 more months. I love getting the latest and greatest, but since I wont be able to afford a whole new computer next year I will be happy with a much faster book.
    I am using 65% of my upgraded ram(4/3.3whatever), never all of my cpu and only 35% of my drive space. Also happy with my external LCD monitor.
    If this http://www.amazon.com/Intel-160GB-Mainstream-Retail-SSDSA2MH160G2R5/dp/B002IJA1E Q/ref=sr12?ie=UTF8&s=electronics&qid=1262409156&sr=8-2 hits $360 it will be a no brainer for me. The 'new computer' option will be right out the window.
    Marco

  • Impact of logical partitioning on BIA

    We are on BI release 701, SP 5. We are planning to create logical partition for some of the infocubes in our system. These cubes are already BIA enabled, so will creation of logical indexes have any impact on the BIA or improve the BIA rollup runtime

    Hi Leonel,
    Logical partitioning will have impact on BIA in terms of performance .
    Current cube is already indexed on BIA. Now if you divide current cube data into different cubes and create multiprovider on it then each cube will have its own F table index on BIA.
    you have to put new cubes to BIA and Execute Initial filling step on BIA and place rollups for respective cubes.
    Point to be noted :
    As Data will be deleted from Current cube and move to other cubes , Indexes will not get deleted
    from corresponding F table indexes in BIA . There will be indexes for records which are not present in cube. Thus it is always a good practice to flush BIA which will remove all the indexes from BIA for current cube and create new Indexes on BIA.
    In this case , we will have consistent indexes on BIA which will not hamper performance.
    This will also improve rollup time as data will be less in each cube after logical partitioning. For rollup
    improvement time , we can implement Delta indexing on BIA as well.
    Question : Why do we want to create logical partitioning for cubes which are present on BIA as queries will never come to Cubes in BI system ?
    Regards,
    Kishanlal Kumawat.

  • How much benefit  do I get going to 5 GB for Logic 7.2.3?

    OK, here's the deal...
    I've recently come into a little extra cash and I'm considering purchasing a RAM upgrade for my 2.66 Mac Pro.
    I run Logic 7.2.3 and I currently have 3 GB RAM and a separate internal 300GB drive for audio.
    In Logic, my songs typically use 15-25 tracks or so comprised of audio files and loops, virtual instruments such as Kontakt 2.2, Guitar Rig 2, Dimension Pro and Stylus RMX. My songs usually have Ableton Live 6 and Reason 3.0.5 rewired as well. I sprinkle a few Space Designers into the songs here and there.
    That said, here is my question:
    Considering how Logic and OS X handle memory, how much benefit would I really see if upgraded to 5GB versus just upgrading to 4GB? Am I correct in assuming that I'd need to wait until Leopard to see benefits beyond 4 GB?
    I only ask because Mac Pro RAM modules are kind of expensive and I don't want to overpay if its not needed. I am hoping that some of you Logic experts can help me out on this!
    Thanks,
    Ken
    Mac Pro "JUGGERNAUT": 2.66 GHz, 3 GB RAM   Mac OS X (10.4.8)   Logic Pro 7.2.3 User

    On PPC machines, I used to have 4GB and went to 8GB as I cannibalized another machine, and I was surprised that memory above 4GB did seem to make a difference. I do run external programs quite often, like Melodyne Studio, so I assumed that it would help a bit, but I found that on bigger song files I think I noticed increased smoothness and stability.
    So perhaps Logic + OS does benefit from increased RAM more than conventional wisdom has suggested. Particularly as you're using processor intensive plugs. I don't know if using these instruments can benefit from RAM over and above Logic's partition in Intel's architecture.

  • How much room should be partitioned for Windows XP?

    Alright, I have a different install disc for XP with SP3 which should work. Since I'll only be using XP for a couple of things (mainly small programs, but also for office and such), how much room should I leave for XP on my 320 gig HD so that both OSs have some breathing room (most of my other stuff like music and pictures are on the Leopard side of things)?

    But I hear that it has better compatibility to run FAT32 than NTFS. Does it really matter too much?
    While OSX is able to read and write to FAT32 partition, it can only read from NTFS partitions.
    With the help of apps like NTFS-3G http://www.ntfs-3g.org/ and/or NTFS for Mac http://www.paragon-software.com/home/ntfs-mac/ OSX can also write to NTFS partitions.
    To me personally this is no problem, since I want OSX and Windows to seperated (I even have Windows on a harddisk of its own in my Mac Pro) and for file exchange between OSX and Windows I use an external FAT32 HD.
    But the advantage of the newer, better and more robust NTFS file system outweighs these 'disadvantages'.
    And FAT32 has a file-size limitation for single-files of 4GB.
    Also, not to be pessimistic, but what if something goes wrong with the partition or install? Can I restart my Mac and would it be unaffected? This disc should work, but I want to know just in case...
    Before 'fumbling' with any kind of partitioning on a harddisk I always make a backup of my important files, or better said I use SuperDuper to make a bootable clone of my OSX.
    While the chances that something goes wrong are quite slim (I have made the partitioning with the BootCamp Assistant for about 10 times now), the possibility is always there.
    Stefan

  • Hi there! How much of Logic can I Install on an external drive ?

    I decided to see how far I could take my beloved eMac G4, 1.25Mz, 2G work horse, so I decided to load it up with as much of Logic9 as poss.
    Now I'm also using a 320G external HD, so I was wondering how much of the Logic I could install on it to ease matters on my 80G internal?
    Many thanks for any pointers.

    If you want to, you can install your OS and ALL of logic on an external drive and boot from it.

  • How much does a logic board cost?

    So apparently my logic board needs to be replaced. I have the apple protection care package, but was told that if I have any liquid spilt on my logic board that I would have to paid to get it fixed. I was just wondering how much one cost, and if my laptop has a blue tint on it would the damage have came from a drink being spilt on it? I read somewhere it tints the computer blue if the computer gets too hot.

    Usually if you have to pay for a new logicboard, you might as well buy a new machine because basically the whole computer is the logicboard.
    I've done some thinking about if it's worth it or not to get your machine fixed and have come ot this sort of rough forumla.
    A Mac has a life expectancy of about 4 years
    One needs to determine where along their life expancy their machine is.
    Then divide the investment into the machine, including the cost of new software that won't work on the new OS, by the 4 years, then from that determine if it's worth it to spend the money to get the remaining life out of it or to sell it once fixed and come out ahead.
    If a machine is just out of the 1 year warranty, no AppleCare, costs $4000 originally, then it might be cost feasible to pay another $700 to get the $3000 due on it. Sell it used for $3500 say and the burn is only $200 (4700-3500 - one year use $1000 = $200)
    Usually third party software a mere year old the developer won't have a paid upgrade, but then again with Appel issuing new OS X versions left and right they may, depending upon how much you pay for third party software and what the upgrade price is also is a factor..

  • Hello there,  there is a rare window that keeps popping up every time i start Logic.  I'd like to send a screenshot... anyway, it's a "tempo" window with strange layout about midi effects and so,.... is it normal?  How can i improve this?  Thanks.

    hello there,  there is a rare window that keeps popping up every time i start Logic.  It's a "tempo" window with strange layout about midi effects and so,.... is it normal?  How can i improve this?  Thanks.

    Hmm, that's some sort of MIDI Arpeggiator setup in your environment. Strange that you don't know it, this has to be custom-installed, it is not part of the standard setup.
    You can do two things about it:
    1.unlock your current screenset (shift-L), then close the (Bass Driver) window, then relock the screenset (shift-L). Next time you open up this project you won't see the Bass Driver, but it is still in the project.
    2. You can remove the whole page: open the Environment (cmd-8), then go to the dropdown menu arrow top left of the Environment window and select the Bass Driver layer. If it is selected, dropdown again and choose Delete. Now Save your project under a different name (Save As...), so that you still keep the Bass Driver setup in the original project. If you don't need to keep it, you can simply Save.

  • How much can high ISO RAWs really be improved?

    Hi everyone,
    I've taken some test pictures with my new Panasonic FZ150, some of them in difficult conditions (night and/or lens at full tele) and at various ISOs. I then tried to see how much of an improvement can be brought about by the processed RAW file, in comparison with the JPG that was produced by the camera at the same time. I did this test because, in my opinion, the JPGs of the FZ150 at high ISO are too noisy to be of any use, and to see whether the (already good) low ISO ones can be improved even further.
    Howver, after playing around with the Develop settings in LightRoom 3 (lum/hue NR, sharpness, detail, etc), I did not manage to get the RAWs to really look any better than their JPG counterparts, at least in terms of the trade-off between noise and detail. So I am now wondering if this is really the limit of the camera's RAW pics and/or of LightRoom (in other words: whether it's worth even bothering with RAW), or whether I am simply not using LightRoom skillfully enough!
    Therefore, if anyone enjoys a RAW challenge, I'd be very curious to see just how good the following RAWs can be processed to become, particularly the high ISO ones. Many thanks in advance!
    http://www.2shared.com/file/y20QhJHX/observator3200_P.html
    http://www.2shared.com/file/GDWtbYlG/observator800_P.html
    http://www.2shared.com/file/qI1xsZC0/P_ISO100_16s_RAW.html
    http://www.2shared.com/file/7ebRkMrI/cladiri800_P.html
    http://www.2shared.com/file/AopjNfPz/night_ISO100.html
    http://www.2shared.com/file/WePPfmbb/day_ISO100.htmld
    http://www.2shared.com/file/zRT_oTwt/cladiri3200_P.html
    http://www.2shared.com/file/eGK68E1U/P_ISO3200_RAW.html

    Been playing around with LR some more, as well as with RawTherapee, but still can't obtain a significant improvement in terms of noise/detail. Any input from more experienced RAW users out there would be very much appreciated

  • How much disk space necessary for a Mac OS 10.4.7 partition?

    I'm planning to replace the stock 80GB HD in my G4 iMac with a 320GB seagate HD. I'll partition it into 3 parts: 1) OS and Apps
    2) Music and Photo libraries
    3) FCE workspace
    How much space should I reserve in the first partition for Mac OS X 10.4.7, iLife 06 and a bunch of additional apps such as iWork, Microsoft Office, Photoshop elements 4, FCE HD 3.5 and Soundtrack and Garageband loops?

    How much are you using now? or don't you have those programs currently?
    I would go 'backwards' and try to guess what you think you need for #2 and #3.
    You also want to leave "ample" space for iDVD to work with temp space for burning etc (32GB).
    It is rarely perfect no matter what the partition scheme. And as a drive fills, it tends to bog down as you get to 65% full.
    I'll say you are going to need at least 80GB plus 32GB and you still want to have 40GB (half of 80GB) free as well. Or, about half your new drive.
    Maybe even another 320GB FW drive for your music and photo libraries would make sense.
    One of the reasons I stopped short of buying iMacIntel and went with the Mac Pro. At least 4-5 hard drives, 2-16GB RAM. And FW800 and option to use eSATA at some point.
    G4 MDD WD 320 OEM 9600 1.75GB SoftAID 3   Mac OS X (10.4.7)   Mac Pro "soon"

  • How much to partition on External HD for Time Machine?

    Hi- I have an 80GB MacBook. I have a new External HD that has 500GB. How much space should I partition so that I can run Time Machine? WIll 100GB do the trick,or should I use more? Thanks for your advice. -Tim

    JG!
    Whew, am I blushing! I totally missed the FAQ-I just came to the forums and started searching for the answer and just blew by the FAQ. My aplogies. Thanks for directing me that way. I appreciate it.
    pat

  • How much should I partition for Time Machine/Backup?

    Hi all,
    I upgraded my PB G4 HD to a 160GB recently and have just purchased a 1TB External HD. How much should I partition in the external to be used for Time Machine backup purposes of my internal HD? Will the same size suffice, or should I allocate more?
    Also, I was thinking of formatting the drive so that it's both Windows and OS X friendly, but that means formatting it to MS-DOS something (I was just reading about it in another thread), will that cause any issues for the partition for Time Machine that I created? Thanks.

    Also, I was thinking of formatting the drive so that it's both Windows and OS X friendly, but that means formatting it to MS-DOS something (I was just reading about it in another thread), will that cause any issues for the partition for Time Machine that I created? Thanks.
    That's not practical. If you want to use the hard drive on a Windows machin while still being useful for Time Machine you should use MacDrive.
    I upgraded my PB G4 HD to a 160GB recently and have just purchased a 1TB External HD. How much should I partition in the external to be used for Time Machine backup purposes of my internal HD? Will the same size suffice, or should I allocate more?
    I would make the partition at least twice the size of the internal drive. Preferably, you would want 50 GB for a Leopard install that includes just the base operating system so you can boot off the 50 GB to recover your Time Machine data if your Leopard installer disc ever becomes unusable.
    Also since you have a Powerbook, your 1 TB hard drive should be Firewire. USB will not boot Powerbooks. If it is USB only, you can remove the external hard drive case and replace it with one compatible with the drive inside that case from http://www.macsales.com/ that has Firewire.

  • How much should I partition?

    I use mac os for the most part bc I do a lot of graphic work on my laptop. Other than that work, I prefer to use windows. How much do you think would be a good size to partition for windows? I was thinking about 100 ( I have a 300 GB hard drive)

    Windows cannot boot from an external drive so that idea is not going to work without some real pain in the butt creativity. I won't recommend that headache.
    To give you an idea, I have a 45GB NTFS partition I use with Windows XPSP2. I mainly and only use it for Internet applications and ALL of MS OFFICE 2007 for Windows programs. Throw in some odds and ends and I have over half of the drive still empty.
    I recommend a minimum of 32GB so that you don't have to have the need for expanding real soon.
    Axel F.

  • How Much Ram Do I Need To Run Logic Pro 9

    Howdy.
    I'm getting ready to do some recording and editing in Logic Pro 9. I'm running a 2011 iMac
    2.7 GHz Intel Cor iS
    Memory 8 GB 1333 MHz DDR3
    I TB HD
    OSX 10.6.8
    Is 8 GB enough memory for Logic, or should I bump it up to 16 GB?
    Thanks!

    diaphones wrote:
    To answer your question... Much of what I do invoves "raiding" the loop library and piecing things together. As time goes on, I'm getting more & more into original "progressive" type stuff. I'm not in a band nor am I affiliated with any other musicians, so I heavily dependent on loops.
    I haven't had any memory issues (yet), but I just read something about freezing tracks taking some of the load off of memory.
    If you're using mostly loops you have plenty of RAM.
    Also, if you're not laying down a bunch of recorded audio tracks.. (like recording a band) your single TB hard drive should do fine. Freezing comes into play when the CPU is nearing load limit because of heavy use of software instruments and effects that demand a lot of CPU.
    I would say for what you're doing at this time, your system is fine as it is.
    If it ain't broke don't fix it.. if/when you run into a problem then deal with it, it's not like you're operating a commercial studio.
    My suggestion would be to learn how to use Logic's effects correctly.. (Reverbs, Compressors, EQ, Delay...etc)
    Use a Reverb or Delay on a bus, then several tracks and use the same effect, if you use all effects as inserts you're wasting CPU.
    Learning how to use your system (as is) is FAR more important than how much RAM, what model Mac or how fast your CPU is.
    A good engineer can make a world class recording in Garageband. Don't get to caught up in what you have or don't have.. have fun, be creative.

  • How much for new mid 2010 logic board?

    So I had my hard drive replaced and ever since then when I am using my computer if it gets knocked at all the screen will either go solid black, blue or orange. Why? I brought my computer into mac life and they said that it was most likely a bad logic board and to take it into apple and they could tell me right then and there what it was. How much do you think that a new logic board will cost? Also, how long do you think it will take to be repaired from the time I take it to the apple store? Oh! and also whenever I close the lid to my computer it doesn't go to sleep. I have a mid 2010 13'' mbp. HELP

    A logic board is an expensive repair.  Only the Apple store genius bar can furnish you with definitive answers to your questions.
    Ciao.

Maybe you are looking for

  • Why can't i open my contacts in yahoo mail when using firefox?

    when i use firefox i can open my yahoo mail & use all its functions excpet i can't access my contacts list, it does not open the list. but i can do this while using Explorer.

  • Home Hub 4 to Sony CMT-G2BNiP home stereo

    I've recently switched to BT BB, using HH3. Everything worked fine! I just upgarded to HH4, where all is good except I can't get a relaible wireless connection to my Sony home stereo CMT-G2BNiP. If I connect using Access Point Scan + manual entry of

  • Profile for POS inbound

    Hi folks, ma client want to use a Profile for POS inbound but without site data. How i can use the profile in this case? Thanks for help. Best regards Michael

  • X11.app problem

    Sorry if this is the wrong forum I wasent sure were to ask this. I am trying to get ethereal to work so I installed x11 from the OSX cd now when I open x11 it bounces in my dock once or twice and then dissapears. When I try to launch it from a termin

  • Read statement from 4.6 to 6.0

    Hi plz help me this statement is working on 4.6 but not working on 6.0   READ TABLE it_konv WITH KEY knumv = it_header-knumv                                 kposn = it_item-posnr                                 kschl = 'ZDSC'