Low cpu usage when exporting

Is it normal to have only 4-12% of cpu usage when exporting video out of ae? I´m exporting it from render queue.
My computer is 2x dual 3,0 ghz prosessor, 8 gb ram, nvidia 8600 gt in xp professional x64
thanks

As Jonas suggested, CPU utilization may be somewhat low because the bottleneck isn't the processing of the data but moving (reading and writing) it.
I'm not saying that this is necessarily what's going on for you, but it's worth pointing out that the CPU is often not the bottleneck.
If disk I/O is what's slowing you down, one way that you can speed things up is to use three disks for your work: one to run the program from, one to store input assets, and one to write output files to.
There are a lot of tips for improving performance in the
"Improve performance" section of After Effects CS3 Help on the Web.

Similar Messages

High CPU usage when graphics card is put at work

I have a 13inch Air with 2GB RAM and 256GB with Windows 7 Ultimate 64bit. All possible updates have been installed.
I noticed some tearing when trying to move program windows across the screen so I started checking the CPU usage. I saw that it is spiking to 25-35% when moving a window across the screen.When you drag down a window you can see the different copies of the top bar across the screen. Not smooth at all like on a standard PC windows system. Same issue when scrolling through webpages which spikes the cpu
I also noticed a high cpu usage when playing mkv files 25-30% while on an Atom HTPC i get a lower load playing the same file. The Air should be faster than an atom with a nvidia 9400m when playing video files.
I already tried updating the nvidia files to the latest version on their site by hacking the driver inf but this did not resolve the issue.
Has anyone experienced the same or know what could be causing the beavior?
Many thanks

Maybe my initial post was not clear so let me add some clarifications.
I have the problem with Aero disabled
I have the problem on the Apple site which does not have any flash content.
I have already hacked the lastest nvidia drivers to get them on my system which did not change anything. Can you provide a link to some other 'supported' beta drivers?
I am using the new 13 inch air so it has the newer graphics card so I would expect it to be faster than an old HTPC with a 9400m in it. I wasn't stating that my Air had a 9400m.
It would be great if someone you also do the test to check the cpu load:
- when playing a 720 mkv
- when dragging a window across the screen
Just open task manager and see if the CPU spikes.
Many thanks!

ITunes 10.6 has High CPU Usage when switched to Mini Player

iTunes has high CPU usage when switched to mini player. The CPU usage goes to 80-100% when the next song is played in Mini Player. iTunes then stays at high CPU usage.
Upon exiting mini player the CPU usage will drop back to the normal 0-5% levels.
This only happens when playing from the main music library; which my library is at 7089 items, 42.04 GB.
When playing from a smaller playlist such as a smart playlist with about 15 songs in it for example, the CPU usage stays low/normal.

Do you have any better luck with that if you update to iTunes 10.6.1.7?
From the notes for the release:
iTunes 10.6.1 provides a number of improvements, including:
• Fixes several issues that may cause iTunes to unexpectedly quit while playing videos, changing artwork size in Grid view and syncing photos to devices.
• Addresses an issue where some iTunes interface elements are incorrectly described by VoiceOver and WindowEyes.
• Fixes a problem where iTunes may become unresponsive while syncing iPod nano or iPod shuffle.
• Resolves an ordering problem while browsing TV episodes in your iTunes library on Apple TV.
http://www.apple.com/itunes/download/

Google Earth Plugin and LabVIEW: High CPU usage when adding placemarks

Hi,
I posted this question on stackoverflow earlier this week but feel it might be better suited to the LabVIEW community specifically so I'm reposting here:
I'm writing an application which uses the Google Earth Plugin to display events on the globe. Each event is a single point kml placemark with an icon which is a 3kb png file. Placemarks are uploaded to the plugin as they are received by the software. I am experiencing increasing CPU usage with the number of placemarks that are added.
I have tested displaying a new placemark every second and running until the software running the plugin completely froze (graph attached). The GEPlugin (green trace) stopped responding (i.e. the globe did not respond to the mouse) at around 1200 placemarks added and CPU usage was at ~30%. When the software itself (red trace) froze the plugin was using around 50% CPU and ~3700 placemarks had been added). After the freeze, no new placemarks were added which caused the software to respond (but not the plugin) so I could clear all the placemarks. After the placemarks were cleared from the globe, the CPU usage of the plugin returned to around 5% CPU.
So what I've seen is that GEPlugin CPU usage increases linearly with each kml placemark added. Is this the expected behaviour/ a normal limitation of the plugin? If not is there a more efficient way of adding many placemarks to the globe?
I am using GEPlugin version 7.1.1.1580 (API version 1.010) and LabVIEW 12.0f3
Please see the test results attached. Any input greatly appreciated!
Original stackoverflow post:
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/20994323/google-earth-plugin-with-labview-high-cpu-usage-when-add...
Attachments:
Performance Log 020114_095115.png ‏82 KB

Hello,
I have had a look at your graphs and understood what you are trying to do. To me it seems that as the image gets more complex it gets harde to render which wold likely cause increase in CPU usage resulting in the freeze. I would suggest you try running the program on anoher computer to check on the RAM front of things. If this is a limitation of the GE Plugin then unfortunately I can not do much to help, but if you think this is a problem coming from your LabVIEW code then you can post your code here and I can take a look.

Reduce CPU Usage when Runnig Telnet on Win2000

Does any one knows how to reduce CPU usage when iam running my telnet developed using java classes.Every time when i start Telnet CPU usage is shooting to 100%.Can any one help to me solve my problem.

You are probably doing some kind of loop that is eating all the CPU idle time. You could reduce your use of the CPU by calling Thread.yield() when you do not need to do anything for a bit, or even better, Thread.sleep(...) to pause your program for a specified number of milliseconds.
Hope this helps some.

BookmarkDav Client spikes my cpu usage when I start up my computer

Has anyone noticed that the BookmarkDav client spikes the CPU usage when it first starts up? Is this something that can be fixed or is there a problem? Thanks for the help.

It has to startup just like everything else in the system, so it's probably normal

High CPU usage when downloading Files

Hi there,
i noticed somethign strage when I download file off the internet or intranet. As soon as my download speed surpasses 1MB/s the CPU usage increases. To be exact the process kernel_task.
For example:
2,5 MB/s -> ~30%
10 MB/s -> ~60-70%
10+ MB/s -> ~80%
This is really annoying and I have now clue how to fix this. The Harddrive is a SAMSUNG HM320JI with a Journaled HFS+ partition. No Virus Scanner or anything. Also just reinstalled Snow Leopard yesterday.
Hope someone can give me some useful information how to fix this.

Hiya,
could it have something to do with the write speed/ cache/ram? On a "slow" disk, or one that is nearly full or one that is partitioned, it will take a great deal more ram and cache to "digest" the faster download and write it onto disk. I tend to do downloads to a separate drive. Have you got one? and can you repeat the high CPU usage when downloading / saving to the external drive? I note your drive might have 5,400 rpm, with "just" 8mB cache and 320 GB (quite a few SATA's have 7,200 rpm and 32 mB cache).
NB: If anything, I found SL more efficient, especially on my 4 year old Macbook, which is running much faster and has got more responsive after installation of (full version of) SL.
Message was edited by: Alexandre

High cpu usage when moving application windows

Hello all,
I have two machines with arch installed:
- an eeepc 701 surf/intel gpu(xorg driver) with xfce
- an amd 3800+ X2/nvidia 8860 gt(proprietary driver) with kdemod3(also checked with xfce4)/arch amd64 installed.
I noticed that when i move a window of an application(for example konsole, etc..) too fast i get high cpu usage(30-40 %), when checking with htop.
Is it normal that the X server uses the cpu so much when moving a window??
EDIT: up to now i tested it in a friends windows machine, and it happens exactly the same, so i guess is normal. It seems i need to be informed better about how X works :-)
Last edited by mechmg93 (2008-10-15 08:04:10)

today i switced back my desktop system to debian unstable and tried to see what the difference is concerning this problem.
I found out that in kde3 the solution to the "problem" is debians kde default configuration about window behaviour.
Especially the one mentioned below :
In debian this is not ticked and this has as a result zero cpu usage when windows are moved.
Last edited by mechmg93 (2008-10-23 18:36:58)

High cpu usage when the system is idle

I do have a high cpu usage problem when the system is idle. I bought the laptop (lenovo x230 tablet) with windows 7 installed in it. Then upgraded to windows 8. But ever since I have problems with high cpu usage by the system even when the computer is idle.
Only the system by itself uses around 30% of the cpu all the time. I ran xperf, and here is the result of it:
http://sdrv.ms/Kj6CFN
I appreciate any help you can provide.
Thanks,

Hi,
I'm sorry for that the log you provide can't be opened on my computer. While according to your description, it should had a special process that consume CPU usage when system idle Iguess, isn't it?
You can use
Process Explorer to monitor the process activity, may be we can find the reason of this problem.
Note: We can use Process Explorer to check the Stack of every process then analyize the problem in deep.
To gave a better insight about this problem, you can take a ScreenShot for this problem and provide the picture here.
Roger Lu
TechNet Community Support

High CPU usage when downloading from ITunes Match

When attempting to download matched songs from ITunes Match, ITunes utilization spikes to over 70% and makes it almost impossible to do any other function on the computer. Eventually ITunes fails to respond. I have tried several remedies including reseting winsock. Is there any other options I should try?

Hiya,
could it have something to do with the write speed/ cache/ram? On a "slow" disk, or one that is nearly full or one that is partitioned, it will take a great deal more ram and cache to "digest" the faster download and write it onto disk. I tend to do downloads to a separate drive. Have you got one? and can you repeat the high CPU usage when downloading / saving to the external drive? I note your drive might have 5,400 rpm, with "just" 8mB cache and 320 GB (quite a few SATA's have 7,200 rpm and 32 mB cache).
NB: If anything, I found SL more efficient, especially on my 4 year old Macbook, which is running much faster and has got more responsive after installation of (full version of) SL.
Message was edited by: Alexandre

High CPU usage when updating or instlling s/w

When updating Win8 or installing MS Office system slows down and has to run all night to make any progress. Task Manager shows "System" using 49%. "go to process" shows "NT Kernel & System". The system was bought with Win7 and is now double booting both 7 & 8. Win 8 partition has 500 GB.
This question was solved.
View Solution.

Hello @Dan-44,
Welcome to the HP Forums, I hope you enjoy your experience! To help you get the most out of the HP Forums I would like to direct your attention to the HP Forums Guide First Time Here? Learn How to Post and More.
I have read your post on how your computer is displaying a high CPU usage when installing updates or other software. I would be happy to assist you in this matter!
What other programs are in use when these updates take place? How full is your computer's Local Disk hard drive? In the meantime, I recommend following the steps in this document on Resolving Slow System Performance (Windows 8). This should help improve the speed and efficiency of your operating system.
Please re-post with the results of your troubleshooting, as well as the requested information above. I look forward to your reply!
Regards
MechPilot
I work on behalf of HP
Please click “Accept as Solution ” if you feel my post solved your issue, it will help others find the solution.
Click the “Kudos, Thumbs Up" on the right to say “Thanks” for helping!

High CPU usage when editing large MXML files

I am using Flash Builder 4.5 Plug-in on OSX. When I have a large MXML file open, Eclipse will consume 100% of the CPU as long as that file is open, even if I am not doing anything. If I close that editor the CPU usage goes back down. I've seen this in Flash Builder standalone as well as the plugin. Is there a workaround to stop this CPU usage problem?
Thanks

Hiya,
could it have something to do with the write speed/ cache/ram? On a "slow" disk, or one that is nearly full or one that is partitioned, it will take a great deal more ram and cache to "digest" the faster download and write it onto disk. I tend to do downloads to a separate drive. Have you got one? and can you repeat the high CPU usage when downloading / saving to the external drive? I note your drive might have 5,400 rpm, with "just" 8mB cache and 320 GB (quite a few SATA's have 7,200 rpm and 32 mB cache).
NB: If anything, I found SL more efficient, especially on my 4 year old Macbook, which is running much faster and has got more responsive after installation of (full version of) SL.
Message was edited by: Alexandre

100% CPU usage when writing to disk

Hi.
I have an Athlon XP 2000+ with 768 MB RAM, a SATA disk, formated to ntfs (running XP) and a IDE disk running Arch (ext3, KDE).
When I copy a big file, the CPU usage stucks to 100% . Doesn't matter the disk I write to or from. The CPU usage is always 100%.
My maximum writing speeds are:
ntfs-3g-->ext3 max ~30 MB/sec
ext3-->ext3 max ~28 MB/sec
ext3-->ntfs-3g max ~15MB/sec
ntfs-3g-->ntfs-3g max ~15 MB/sec
I understand that writing to ext3 is much faster because it is a native linux fs, but I cant understand why the high CPU usage.
While coping, ksysguard shows that the progress with the higher system% is kio_file when coping ext3-->ext3, or kio_file and ntfs-3g, when coping from or to a ntfs disk.
The problem is not with the CPU, in windows the writing speed is higher and the CPU usage is much lower. So I thing this is an Arch configuration problem but don't know where exactly to look. Searched the forum but didnt find any solution.
Any ideas? Anyone with similar problems?
Last edited by matersci (2007-09-09 22:37:00)

with hdparm -I /dev/sda I get:
hdparm -I /dev/sda
/dev/sda:
ATA device, with non-removable media
Model Number: Maxtor 6L200M0
Serial Number: L41ZFT2C
Firmware Revision: BACE1G10
Standards:
Used: ATA/ATAPI-7 T13 1532D revision 0
Supported: 7 6 5 4
Configuration:
Logical max current
cylinders 16383 16383
heads 16 16
sectors/track 63 63
CHS current addressable sectors: 16514064
LBA user addressable sectors: 268435455
LBA48 user addressable sectors: 398297088
device size with M = 1024*1024: 194481 MBytes
device size with M = 1000*1000: 203928 MBytes (203 GB)
Capabilities:
LBA, IORDY(can be disabled)
Queue depth: 32
Standby timer values: spec'd by Standard, no device specific minimum
R/W multiple sector transfer: Max = 16 Current = 16
Advanced power management level: unknown setting (0x0000)
Recommended acoustic management value: 192, current value: 254
DMA: mdma0 mdma1 mdma2 udma0 udma1 udma2 udma3 udma4 udma5 *udma6
Cycle time: min=120ns recommended=120ns
PIO: pio0 pio1 pio2 pio3 pio4
Cycle time: no flow control=120ns IORDY flow control=120ns
Commands/features:
Enabled Supported:
* SMART feature set
Security Mode feature set
* Power Management feature set
* Write cache
* Look-ahead
* Host Protected Area feature set
* WRITE_VERIFY command
* WRITE_BUFFER command
* READ_BUFFER command
* NOP cmd
* DOWNLOAD_MICROCODE
Advanced Power Management feature set
SET_MAX security extension
* Automatic Acoustic Management feature set
* 48-bit Address feature set
* Device Configuration Overlay feature set
* Mandatory FLUSH_CACHE
* FLUSH_CACHE_EXT
* SMART error logging
* SMART self-test
Media Card Pass-Through
* General Purpose Logging feature set
* WRITE_{DMA|MULTIPLE}_FUA_EXT
* URG for READ_STREAM[_DMA]_EXT
* URG for WRITE_STREAM[_DMA]_EXT
* SATA-I signaling speed (1.5Gb/s)
* Native Command Queueing (NCQ)
Software settings preservation
* SMART Command Transport (SCT) feature set
* SCT Data Tables (AC5)
Security:
Master password revision code = 65534
supported
not enabled
not locked
not frozen
not expired: security count
not supported: enhanced erase
Checksum: correct
It says ATA device, with non-removable media but this is a SATA disk!
Also,
# hdparm -t /dev/sda
/dev/sda:
Timing buffered disk reads: 166 MB in 3.01 seconds = 55.23 MB/sec (SATA Disk)
and
# hdparm -t /dev/hdb
/dev/hdb:
Timing buffered disk reads: 176 MB in 3.02 seconds = 58.26 MB/sec (IDE Disk)
hdprm says dma is on for the ide disk, but says nothing about dma for the SATA.
I think the problem is because the kernel recognize the SATA disk as IDE.
Last edited by matersci (2007-09-19 20:24:10)

Only max 30% cpu usage when rendering

I making an animation that I have done in 3dsMax and save it as a .png sequence. Have done the editing in Premiere cs3, but when I export it with Adobe media encoder as .wmv, it only uses max 30% of the CPU, I have a quadcore 9550, and Vista buisniess64 with 8GB ram.
I have tried to de-select de-interlace option in the output tab as suggested from other forums.
But the strange is when I export from the same timeline and have a clip from the HDV camera the CPU goes up to 100%. Why does not premiere uses 100% the whole time?

Maybe the extra CPU usage is related to the HDV decoding process, which is probably more intensive than PNG decoding... Or, the PNG reader is not multi-threaded at all and this "bottleneck" is slowing down the entire process. ???
Also: Do not check the "deinterlace" box unless you want to deinterlace and even then you should perhaps look for other options. Premiere's deinterlacer is utter garbage.

Beachballing and extreme GUI latency with low CPU usage

I generally only have two applications open. iTunes 11 playing MP3s of about 128kbps, and latest Google Chrome with up to 4-5 tabs. Usually I have gmail open, Facebook, and maybe 1-2 sites such as YouTube or Slashdot. I don't have any servers running.
The CPU load is usually 90% idle. The system load hovers around 1.5 for some reason. Though at times it jumps up to 3.5 even though CPU remains at 90% idle. I read a ton of Facebook pages. After about 30-40 page loads, Chrome stops letting me scroll. I can still click in the address bar, so I know the whole system isn't frozen. I can change tasks via ALT-TAB, however, when I do that, it takes 10 seconds for it to switch to Terminal. When Termianl is finally shown, it jumps to 90% CPU for a few seconds, and updates 5 times in a row, quickly, like a stuttering video, and then it is normal. If I activate Expose by moving the mouse to the bottom left corner, it shows the Dock right away, but then it just sits there frozen for 15 seconds, and then it shows the windows and whatnot. If I switch to the Finder and click on an icon, it doesn't do anything. I then click on another icon. Nothing. I then try to draw a bounding square on the empty desktop. Nothing. Then after about 30 seconds of being frozen, the system does EVERYTHING I did in a quick hurry. It selects the first icon, the second, draws a square, selects another icon.. etc. It seems to be queueing all my actions but not responding to them immediately. If I try to delete a file, the beachball shows up, and then after about 30 seconds it shows a progress bar, even for a tiny little text file, the progress bar takes 5 seconds, and then it removes it from the desktop. If I press Mac-T to open a new tab in Chrome, I get a beachball and it takes up to a full minute before the new tab shows up!
While all of this is happening I've been monitoring my system with top, the CPU keeps at 90% idle! And the load is usually below 2.0! I have a Core 2 Duo 2.1 gHz MacBook 13" with 2GB of RAM, and there's about 25 GB free on the main disk. There is also an external firewire drive connected. Every 5 minutes the Mac OS wakes up the drive from sleep even though I'm not using it, and while the drive is starting up the whole system freezes for 5-10 seconds again!!
What the **** kinda joke of an operating system is this?!?!!? I thought Macs were multitasking and everything! I'm seriously concerned.... I"ve never had these problems in Windows, and never had these problems in Linux. ***?!!!?! I can't use more than 5 tabs in Chrome either. It's way too slow. And most videos on YouTube I can't watch unless I lower to 340p or 240p, otherwise they freeze and stuff. Even though I have enough bandwdith.. The system can't handle the video. It's so frustrating. Oh and one more thing. While scrolling through pages on Facebook, iTunes pauses at random points as if it can't handle the scrolling.... ***??!?!?!
Please help me!!!

Hello? Does anyone from Adobe know why this is happening?
I understand why frames would be dropped if you set high
quality and your CPU can't encode in real time however the 30% cpu
usage I am getting while encoding isn't indicating to me I have a
cpu issue.
Also as a note when I change the quality settings at no point
can I get my CPU to actually get busy enough where I think frames
should be dropping.
Another side question. Is FME mult-threaded? We all know dual
cores are popular now. Also when I say 30% if its a single threaded
app, that would mean 100% = 2 cores, 50% = 1 core, so 30% of of
that 100% would be all on one core if its a single threaded
application.
This would mean perhaps the utilization is higher than
expected and frames are dropping perhaps.
Any insight would be great.
Thanks and take care.

Low cpu usage when exporting

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for