Many to Many Relationship

In powerpivot we are facing problem in resolving the many-to-many relationship between tables.
Current table schema is:
Having 4 tables-
Bills - columns are- Bill No(primary key)
Billing Fee Table-Fee ID(primary key), Bill Type, Sub Bill Type
FeeList Table-FeeList ID(primary key),Fee ID(Foriegn Key to Billingble),
Bill No(Foriegn Key to Bills)
Payments Table-Pay ID(Primary Key), Bill No(Foriegn Key to Bills)
Bills is the primary table for Feelist Table
and Payments Table -Bill No is the primary key.
Billing Fee Table is primary table for FeeList Table -
Fee ID is the primary key.
To create a pivot table using Payments Table, I need
Bill Type and Sub Bill Type. Hence fetched from
Biling Fee Table to FeeList Table based on the
Fee ID column using RELATED function.
As FeeList Table and Payments Table is having duplicate
Bill Nos, it is not possible to get Bill Type and
Sub Bill Type to Payments Table. I am trying to use LOOKUPVALUE
function to get data based on the Bill No, as there is no direct relationship exists between these two tables.
I have tried using
=LOOKUPVALUE('FeeList Table'[Sub Bill Type], 'FeeList Table'[Bill No], 'Payments Table'[Bill No]) function. But
the lookupvalue function returns an error if a duplicate is found.
Error is as below:
Calculation error in column 'Payments Table'[Sub Bill Type]: A table of multiple values was supplied where a single value was expected.
Kindly assist to resolve this issue.
Thanks

Hi Rekha,
What should your LOOKUPVALUE return if multiple rows are found in the FeeListTable? By the way it should work if a really finds "duplicates" (i.e. multiple times the same return value) but fails if it returns multiple rows with different values.
If you for example would want to return the first entry that was found, you could try (have not checked in PP for typos):
CALCULATE(MIN('FeeList Table'[Sub Bill Type]),
  FILTER('FeeList Table',
     'FeeList Table'[Bill No] = 'Payments Table'[Bill No]
Edit: a very nice way to handle Many-to-Many relationships is explained here:
http://blog.gbrueckl.at/2012/05/resolving-many-to-many-relationships-leveraging-dax-cross-table-filtering/
Julian Wissel | BI for NAV @ http://en.navbi.com | Blog @ blog.navida.eu

Similar Messages

  • Problem with 1-to-many relationship between entity beans

    Hi All!
    I have two tables TMP_GROUP and TMP_EMPLOYEE with following fields:
    TMP_GROUP: ID, CAPTION, COMMENT, STATUS.
    TMP_EMPLOYEE: ID, LOGIN, GROUP_ID.
    For this tables i create two entity beans GROUP and EMPLOYEE respectively.
    The relationship looks like this
    descriptor ejb.xml:
    <ejb-relation>
                <description>description</description>
                <ejb-relation-name>employeesOfGroup</ejb-relation-name>
                <ejb-relationship-role>
                    <ejb-relationship-role-name>com.mypackage.GroupBean</ejb-relationship-role-name>
                    <multiplicity>One</multiplicity>
                    <relationship-role-source>
                        <ejb-name>GroupBean</ejb-name>
                    </relationship-role-source>
                    <cmr-field>
                        <cmr-field-name>employees</cmr-field-name>
                        <cmr-field-type>java.util.Collection</cmr-field-type>
                    </cmr-field>
                </ejb-relationship-role>
                <ejb-relationship-role>
                    <ejb-relationship-role-name>com.mypackage.EmployeeBean</ejb-relationship-role-name>
                    <multiplicity>Many</multiplicity>
                    <relationship-role-source>
                        <ejb-name>EmployeeBean</ejb-name>
                    </relationship-role-source>
                </ejb-relationship-role>
            </ejb-relation>
    descriptor persistent.xml:
    <table-relation>
                   <table-relationship-role
                        key-type="PrimaryKey">
                        <ejb-name>GroupBean</ejb-name>
                        <cmr-field>employees</cmr-field>
                   </table-relationship-role>
                   <table-relationship-role
                        key-type="NoKey">
                        <ejb-name>EmployeeBean</ejb-name>
                        <fk-column>
                             <column-name>GROUP_ID</column-name>
                             <pk-field-name>ejb_pk</pk-field-name>
                        </fk-column>
                   </table-relationship-role>
              </table-relation>
    Now i implement business method:
    public Long addEmployee(String login, long groupId) {
              Long result;
              try {
                   EmployeeLocal employee = employeeHome.create(login);
                   GroupLocal group =
                        groupHome.findByPrimaryKey(new Long(groupId));
                   Collection employees = group.getEmployees();
                   employees.add(employee);
                   result = (Long) employee.getPrimaryKey();
              } catch (CreateException ex) {
                   result = new Long(0);
              } catch (FinderException ex) {
                   result = new Long(0);
              return result;
    When i call this method from web service, the following exception is raised:
    com.sap.engine.services.ejb.exceptions.BaseTransactionRolledbackLocalException: Exception in method com.mypackage.GroupLocalHomeImpl0.findByPrimaryKey(java.lang.Object).
    P.S.
    1) I have transaction attribute set to "Required" for all methods of all beans
    2) I have unique index for each table:
    TMP_GROUP_I1: CAPTION
    TMP_EMPLOYEE_I1: LOGIN (however i think GROUP_ID must be added here too)
    3) I tried many:many relationship with this tables and it works fine
    4) I try another implementation of addEmployee method with
    EmployeeLocal employee = employeeHome.create(login, groupId);
    without using GroupLocal cmr-field and GroupLocalHome findByPrimaryKey method, the result is same error.
    Can somebody help me with this problem?
    Thanks in advance.
    Best regards, Abramov Andrey.

    gimbal2 wrote:
    1: The @JoinColumn on the listOfDepartments collection in Company is wrong. It should be something like this for a bidirectional relationship:
    @OneToMany(mappedBy="company") // company is the matching property name in Department
    private List <Department> listOfDepartment = new ArrayList<Department>();Note that I removed the fetch configuration; onetomany is fetched lazy by design. Saves some clutter eh.
    2: use a Set in stead of a List (hibernate doesn't like lists much in entities and will break when you create slightly more complex entity relations)
    3: don't just slap cascades on collections, especially of type ALL. Do it with care. In the many years I've been using JPA I've only had to cascade deletes in very specific situations, maybe once or twice. I never needed any of the other cascade types, they just invite sloppy code if you ask me. When working with persistence you should apply a little precision.I made all changes as you mentioned but still compID in department table shows null value...

  • Problem with 1:many relationship between entity beans.

    Hi All!
    I have two tables TMP_GROUP and TMP_EMPLOYEE with following fields:
    TMP_GROUP: ID, CAPTION, COMMENT, STATUS.
    TMP_EMPLOYEE: ID, LOGIN, GROUP_ID.
    For this tables i create two entity beans GROUP and EMPLOYEE respectively.
    The relationship looks like this
    descriptor ejb.xml:
    <ejb-relation>
                <description>description</description>
                <ejb-relation-name>employeesOfGroup</ejb-relation-name>
                <ejb-relationship-role>
                    <ejb-relationship-role-name>com.mypackage.GroupBean</ejb-relationship-role-name>
                    <multiplicity>One</multiplicity>
                    <relationship-role-source>
                        <ejb-name>GroupBean</ejb-name>
                    </relationship-role-source>
                    <cmr-field>
                        <cmr-field-name>employees</cmr-field-name>
                        <cmr-field-type>java.util.Collection</cmr-field-type>
                    </cmr-field>
                </ejb-relationship-role>
                <ejb-relationship-role>
                    <ejb-relationship-role-name>com.mypackage.EmployeeBean</ejb-relationship-role-name>
                    <multiplicity>Many</multiplicity>
                    <relationship-role-source>
                        <ejb-name>EmployeeBean</ejb-name>
                    </relationship-role-source>
                </ejb-relationship-role>
            </ejb-relation>
    descriptor persistent.xml:
    <table-relation>
                   <table-relationship-role
                        key-type="PrimaryKey">
                        <ejb-name>GroupBean</ejb-name>
                        <cmr-field>employees</cmr-field>
                   </table-relationship-role>
                   <table-relationship-role
                        key-type="NoKey">
                        <ejb-name>EmployeeBean</ejb-name>
                        <fk-column>
                             <column-name>GROUP_ID</column-name>
                             <pk-field-name>ejb_pk</pk-field-name>
                        </fk-column>
                   </table-relationship-role>
              </table-relation>
    Now i implement business method:
    public Long addEmployee(String login, long groupId) {
              Long result;
              try {
                   EmployeeLocal employee = employeeHome.create(login);
                   GroupLocal group =
                        groupHome.findByPrimaryKey(new Long(groupId));
                   Collection employees = group.getEmployees();
                   employees.add(employee);
                   result = (Long) employee.getPrimaryKey();
              } catch (CreateException ex) {
                   result = new Long(0);
              } catch (FinderException ex) {
                   result = new Long(0);
              return result;
    When i call this method from web service, the following exception is raised:
    com.sap.engine.services.ejb.exceptions.BaseTransactionRolledbackLocalException: Exception in method com.mypackage.GroupLocalHomeImpl0.findByPrimaryKey(java.lang.Object).
    P.S.
    1) I have transaction attribute set to "Required" for all methods of all beans
    2) I have unique index for each table:
    TMP_GROUP_I1: CAPTION
    TMP_EMPLOYEE_I1: LOGIN (however i think GROUP_ID must be added here too)
    3) I tried many:many relationship with this tables and it works fine
    4) I try another implementation of addEmployee method with
    EmployeeLocal employee = employeeHome.create(login, groupId);
    without using GroupLocal cmr-field and GroupLocalHome findByPrimaryKey method, the result is same error.
    Can somebody help me with this problem?
    Thanks in advance.
    Best regards, Abramov Andrey.

    I have posted excerpts from my orion-ejb-jar.xml file in this posting: Problem mapping a 1:M relationship between two entity EJBs w/ a compound PK
    Sorry for the duplicate postings, but I was getting errors on the submission.
    April

  • ONE-to-MANY relationship between tables and forms in APEX

    I recently started using APEX and I have run into an issue.
    I have a ONE-TO-MANY relationship between two tables, A1 and A2, respectively.
    A1:
    A1_ID
    Item
    A2:
    A2_ID
    SubItem
    A1_ID
    I have 2 forms (lets call it F1 and F2) that I use to capture data for A1 and A2.
    On F2, I have the following fields that are setup to capture data:
         A2.A1_ID
    **A1.Item (this is a drop down that is populated using a SELECT statement where the select uses A1.Item field)
         A2.SubItem (user would enter SubItem)
    Note: A2.A2_ID is populated using a SEQ
    Everytime I pick **A1.Item on F2, is there a way to link to A1 table and display A1.A1_ID for every **A1.Item selected on F2?
    If so, I want to store the value captured in F2 for the A1_ID field into A2 table to maintain my 1-to-MANY relationship.
    If this will work, how do I go about implementing this solution?
    Can someone help me?

    I think it sounds like you are asking for a Master-Detail form. Try that and see what you get.
    chris.

  • Many to Many Relationships in ejb.....Urgent Pls help

    hi all,
    Am working in EJB.Now we are coding for many to many relationship.
    Company and Salary register
    One Company can have many salary register and More than one company can have one salary register
    Companyand Salary register are the two tables having details of it.And the intermediate table having pk of company and salary register is Company_salary_register table,I want to add the value in this table having seperate interface.
    How to model it? I have given the add method of this company_salary_register table in company bean.I am getting the value of this one as collection.But it is asking me to add the values as the instance of LocalSalary(interfaceand entitybean).If i type cast it as Local Salary Class castexception occurs
    Please help me.Even Material of Modelling Many to Many relationship in EJB is enough.
    thanx in advance,

    THaaaaaanks alottt for the quick reply...
    I used the first way to insert the document and i was successful...
    but thing is that..
    when i do
    SQL>desc message_type
    message_type is NOT FINAL
    Name Null? Type
    SYS_XDBPD$ XDB.XDB$RAW_LIST_T
    to VARCHAR2(4000 CHAR)
    from VARCHAR2(4000 CHAR)
    subject VARCHAR2(4000 CHAR)
    body VARCHAR2(4000 CHAR)
    i can see the structure...
    and when i
    select count(*) from messages
    it says count is 1.
    so how to know where the data is ..like below in the data :
    'to' it has '[email protected]'
    and for 'from' it has '[email protected]'..and so on..
    <message>
    <to>[email protected]</to>
    <from>[email protected]</from>
    <subject>Question</subject>
    <body>Does this demo work?</body>
    </message>
    so what is the command to get that data...
    because when i do
    select * from message_type..it says
    select * from message_type
    ERROR at line 1:
    ORA-04044: procedure, function, package, or type is not allowed here
    Plss help me outt.......this will be my final step...
    Thankssssssssssssssss

  • Urgent : java bean having bidirectional one to many relationship

    Hi,
    We have complex requirement in our application.
    We need to copy java bean having bidirectional one to many relationship to another javabean having bidirectional one to many relationship..
    E.g
    Class Basket1 {
    public String color;
    pubic String type;
    public List<Basket1> basketList = new ArrayList()
    Class Basket2 {
    public String color;
    pubic String type;
    public List<Basket2> basketList = new ArrayList()
    We need to exact copy Basket1 to Basket2. We are in trouble to copy List of child because we do not have how many child Basket1 have of same type..
    Can someone help us how we can implement such kind of complex object bidirectional one to many relationship??

    I can't see anything bidirectional about these relationships. What I can see is a couple of BasketN classes that look identical so I don't know why they both exist, and they both contain lists of themselves as members, which suggests some kind of tree structure. Nothing bidirectional there. I can see tat these things can form circular object graphs but I don't see why you would want to do that.
    We need to exact copy Basket1 to Basket2And I don't know what that means. Please explain.

  • Creating data in a many-to-many-relationship

    Hello,
    we really have problems in implementing a JClient dialog based on BC4J for creating data in a many to many relationship - especially with cascade delete on both sides.
    Simplified our tables look like:
    create table A_TABLE
    A_ID VARCHAR2(5) not null,
    A_NAME VARCHAR2(30) not null,
    constraint PK_A_TABLE primary key (A_ID),
    constraint UK_A_TABLE unique (A_NAME)
    create table B_TABLE
    B_ID VARCHAR2(5) not null,
    B_NAME VARCHAR2(30) not null,
    constraint PK_B_TABLE primary key (B_ID),
    constraint UK_B_TABLE unique (B_NAME)
    create table AB_TABLE
    A_ID VARCHAR2(5) not null,
    B_ID VARCHAR2(5) not null,
    constraint PK_AB_TABLE primary key (A_ID, B_ID),
    constraint FK_AB_A foreign key (A_ID) references A_TABLE (A_ID) on delete cascade,
    constraint FK_AB_B foreign key (B_ID) references B_TABLE (B_ID) on delete cascade
    Could JDev Team please provide a BC4J/JClient sample that performs the following task:
    The dialog should use A_TABLE as master and AB_TABLE as detail. The detail displays the names associated with the IDs. Next to AB_TABLE should be a view of B_TABLE which only displays rows that are currently not in AB_TABLE. Two buttons are used for adding and removing rows in AB_TABLE. After adding or removing rows in the intersection the B_TABLE view should be updated. The whole thing should work in the middle and client tier. This means no database round trips after each add/remove, no posts for AB_TABLE and no query reexecution for B_TABLE until commit/rollback.
    This is a very common szenario: For an item group (A_TABLE) one can select and deselect items (AB_TABLE) from a list of available items (B_TABLE). Most of JDeveloper4s wizards use this. They can handle multi/single selections, selections from complex structures like trees and so on. Ok, the wizards are not based on BC4J - or? How can we do it with BC4J?
    Our main problems are:
    1. Updating the view of B_TABLE after add/remove reflecting the current selection
    2. A good strategy for displaying the names instead of the IDs (subqueries or joining the three tables)
    3. A JBO-27101 DeadEntityAccessException when removing an existing row from AB_TABLE and adding it again
    Other problems:
    4. We get a JBO-25030 InvalidOwnerException when creating a row in AB_TABLE. This is caused by the composition. We workaround this using createAndInitRow(AttributeList) on the view object (instead of create()). This is our add-Action:
    ViewObject abVO = panelBinding.getApplicationModule().findViewObject("ABView");
    ViewObject bVO = panelBinding.getApplicationModule().findViewObject("BView");
    Row bRow = bVO.getCurrentRow();
    NameValuePairs attribList = new NameValuePairs(
    new String[]{"BId"}, new Object[]{bRow.getAttribute("BId")});
    Row newRow = abVO.createAndInitRow(attribList);
    abVO.insertRow(newRow);
    5. After inserting the new row the NavigationBar has enabled commit/rollback buttons and AB_TABLE displays the row. But performing a commit does nothing. With the following statement after insertRow(newRow) the new row is created in the database:
    newRow.setAttribute("BId", bRow.getAttribute("BId"));
    Please give us some help on this subject.
    Best regards
    Michael Thal

    <Another attempt to post a reply. >
    Could JDev Team please provide a BC4J/JClient sample
    that performs the following task:
    The dialog should use A_TABLE as master and AB_TABLE
    as detail. The detail displays the names associated
    with the IDs. Next to AB_TABLE should be a view of
    B_TABLE which only displays rows that are currently
    not in AB_TABLE. Two buttons are used for adding and
    removing rows in AB_TABLE. After adding or removing
    rows in the intersection the B_TABLE view should be
    updated. The whole thing should work in the middle
    and client tier. This means no database round trips
    after each add/remove, no posts for AB_TABLE and no
    query reexecution for B_TABLE until commit/rollback.
    This is a very common szenario: For an item group
    (A_TABLE) one can select and deselect items
    (AB_TABLE) from a list of available items (B_TABLE).
    Most of JDeveloper4s wizards use this. They can
    handle multi/single selections, selections from
    complex structures like trees and so on. Ok, the
    wizards are not based on BC4J - or? How can we do it
    with BC4J?
    Our main problems are:
    1. Updating the view of B_TABLE after add/remove
    reflecting the current selectionYou should be able to use insertRow() to insert the row into proper collection.
    However to remove a row only from the collection, you need to add a method on the VO subclasses (and perhaps export this method so that the client side should see it) to unlink a row from a collection (but not remove the associated entities from the cache).
    This new method should use ViewRowSetImpl.removeRowAt() method to remove the row entry at the given index from it's collection. Note that this is an absolute index and not a range index in the collection.
    2. A good strategy for displaying the names instead
    of the IDs (subqueries or joining the three tables)You should join the three tables by using reference (and perhaps readonly) entities.
    3. A JBO-27101 DeadEntityAccessException when
    removing an existing row from AB_TABLE and adding it
    againThis is happening due to remove() method on the Row which is marking the row as removed. Attempts to add this row into another collection will throw a DeadEntityAccessException.
    You may 'remove the row from it's collection, then call 'Row.refresh' on it to revert the entity back to undeleted state.
    >
    Other problems:
    4. We get a JBO-25030 InvalidOwnerException when
    creating a row in AB_TABLE. This is caused by the
    composition. We workaround this using
    createAndInitRow(AttributeList) on the view object
    (instead of create()). This is our add-Action:
    ViewObject abVO =
    O =
    panelBinding.getApplicationModule().findViewObject("AB
    iew");
    ViewObject bVO =
    O =
    panelBinding.getApplicationModule().findViewObject("BV
    ew");
    Row bRow = bVO.getCurrentRow();
    NameValuePairs attribList = new NameValuePairs(
    new String[]{"BId"}, new
    String[]{"BId"}, new
    Object[]{bRow.getAttribute("BId")});
    Row newRow = abVO.createAndInitRow(attribList);
    abVO.insertRow(newRow);This is a handy approach. Note that Bc4j framework does not support dual composition where the same detail can be owned by two or more masters. In those cases, you also need to implement post ordering to post the masters before the detail (and reverse ordering for deletes).
    >
    5. After inserting the new row the NavigationBar has
    enabled commit/rollback buttons and AB_TABLE displays
    the row. But performing a commit does nothing. With
    the following statement after insertRow(newRow) the
    new row is created in the database:
    newRow.setAttribute("BId",
    d", bRow.getAttribute("BId"));This bug in JDev 903 was fixed and a patch set (9.0.3.1) is (I believe) available now via MetaLink.
    >
    >
    Please give us some help on this subject.
    Best regards
    Michael Thal

  • How to insert data in a one-to-many relationship

    How do you insert data into the client, my model entity beans have a one-to-many relationship.
    PARENT ENTITY BEAN
    PARENT-ID
    PARENT-NAME
    The ejbCreate(Integer parentID,String name)
    CHILD ENTITY BEAN
    CHILD-ID
    CHILD-NAME
    PARENT-ID(foreign key of PARENTID).
    ejbCreate(Integer parentID,String name,String foreignparentID)
    In a jsp page i collect the parent details and 3 corresponding chld details in a text box.
    Can you please tell me how do i proceed from here...
    ie. how to i insert data into the entity beans..
    Do i pass the child as a collection, and within parents ejbCreate() method do i lookup for the childs home interface and insert one -by -one from the collection.
    1. Considering the above example, can some one pls tell how the ejbCreate() mehod signatures, for the parent and child entity beans should be.
    2. Pls also show some sample client code as to how to make an insertion.
    3. In case you are passing a collection of child data, then in what format does one have to insert into a collection and also how does the container know how to insert the values in the child table , bcoz we are passing as a collection.
    4.In case collections cannot be inserted do we need to iterate into the collection in parent's ejbCreate() method, and manually insert into the database of the childtable, thereby creating child entity beans.
    Thanks for your time and support...
    regards
    kartik

    Hi,
    3. In this case of course child's ejbCreate(and postCreate) looks like
    ejbCreate(Integer childID,String name,ParentLocal parent) {
    setId(Id);
    setName(name);
    ejbPostCreate(Integer childID,String name,ParentLocal parent) {
    setParent(parent);
    Here you don't need IDs, but it happens only using Locals, not Remotes, if I'm not wrong. Container does it itself.
    1. Of course, if you have parent.getChildren() and parent.setChildren() then you don't need any loops, but it should be done anyway in postCreate, because in ejbCreate there no parent exists yet.
    Once more 3: example - I'm using JBoss 3.2.5 as EJB container. It has tomcat inside and EJB and JSP+Struts use the same jvm. It means for me that I don't need to use remote interfaces, just locals. And in this case I can implement ejb-relations. So, a have the abstract method parent.getChildren() which returns Collection of ChildLocal - s and method parent.setChildren(Collection childrenLocals) which creates/modifies children by itself.
    I have not used remotes for a long time, but as I remember it was not possible to implement ejb-relations using remotes.
    regards,
    Gio

  • Many-to-many relationship - show all values

    Hi,
    I'm building a cube in 2008R2 and have a many-to-many relationship through a bridging table but when displaying the results it is effectively an inner join and I would like to see a full outer join with the unknown rows set to "unknown".
    I've managed to achieve this by doing a full outer join in the view that creates my bridging table and having an unknown member in my dimensions but then when I added in a dimension that wasn't directly related to the bridging table the unknown rows
    were removed again. I was able to get past this by adding a row to my fact table with all the keys set to unknown and the metrics set to zero.
    Whilst this works it really does not seem like an ideal solution, especially as previously empty metrics are now returning a zero.
    Is there any way to achieve this in SSAS? Perhaps in the way unknown members are processed?
    Thanks,

    cccparkhill,
    What you did is the only way to achieve what you want.
    In cubes you connect Dimensions throw Facts. By definition dimensions are
    “How do business people describe the data that
    results from the business process?”
     and facts are “What are we measuring?”, noting the underlined
    we can understand that _normally and usually_ the relation between the dimensions and the facts represent incidents happened in the real world ... the way you approach, think, and deal with dimensions and facts in cubes is different than dealing with tables
    in normal relational transnational database.
    Personally I do what you did when I want to achieve "Left join"
    Please mark this reply as the answer
    or vote as helpful, as appropriate, to make it useful for other readers

  • Many to many relationship mapping.

    Hi
    I have a basic question on how to create a good java class model (POJOs) based on the database model.
    I Have to follwing tables
    Table1 with columns as
    ID1
    name
    description
    Table2 with columns as
    ID2
    dateCreated ..etc.
    Since there is a many to many relationship between table1 and table2
    So to map that we have a table3 with columns
    ID3
    ID1 // fk table1
    ID2 // fk table2
    browserName
    startTime
    endTime
    So when I create Java classes:
    // corresponding to table 1
    Class MyTable1
    private Integer ID1;
    private List ID2; // to map with the table2
    // corresponding to table 2
    Class MyTable2
    private Integer ID2
    private List ID1; // to map with table 1
    In this way I can create my classes. Is this the best way to put it together.
    And where to put the attributed specific to table3. Like the BrowserName and the StartTime and the EndTime.
    Any suggestion please.
    Thanks.

    Your names leave a lot to be desired. Let's start with an example. Suppose I have a problem involving employees and the tasks assigned to them. An employee may have any number of tasks assigned to them and a task can be assigned to any number of employees. The assignment itself has more attributes: when it was assigned, its priority and so on.
    public interface Employee {
        Long getId(); //etc...
        Set<Assignment> getAssignments();
        void setAssignments(Set<Assignment> assignments);
    public interface Task {
        Long getId(); //etc...
        Set<Assignment> getAssignments();
        void setAssignments(Set<Assignment> assignments);
    public interface Assignment {
        Long getId(); //etc...
        Employee getEmployee();
        void setEmployee(Employee employee);
        Task getTask();
        void setTask(Task task);
    }This assumes you want to navigate in all directions: from an employee to their assignments, from a task to its assignments and from an assignment to it employee and task.

  • Many to many relationship does not work on certain role played dimension

    Hi,
    I have a cube with role playing Account dimension, used once as “Account” and once as “Other Account” dimension.
    I’ve added Trip dimension related to the account dimension by a bridge table AccountTrip 
    making a many to many relationship (many accounts can be in one trip and one account can go to many trips).
    When I added the bridge measure group to the cube, I saw in the dimension usage tab that the relationship between the bridge and the Account dimension was done automatically.
     I added the trip dimension with regular relationship to the bridge measure group and many to many relationship to the main fact table using the bridge group.
    All compiled fine and gave correct results. Then I noticed that when slicing the fact table by the Other account dimension I get correct results,
     but when I add the Trip dimension I get the results as if I was slicing by the Account dimension, not by the “Other account” dimension.
    I checked the cube and noticed I did not set the relationship between the bridge to the “Other Account” dimension (role playing). I set it now (regular relationship, same as the account dimension), but still getting the same results.
    Conclusion-  when slicing by the new Trip (M2M) dimension and the “Other Account”
     (role played) dimension I get the results of the “Account” dimension, not those of the “Other Account” dimension.
    I checked the relationships of the “Other Account” dimension in the cube but it looks correctly set (to the external account of the main fact table and to account of the bridge table).
    (Just to note I have two other bridges on the cube which are not related and don’t look like they need to be related, plus two other measure groups of the main fact table used for distinct count which are related appropriately).
    What else should be done???
    I would greatly appreciate your help!
    Thanks
    Namnami

    The update server is down; try this temporary workaround
    App Store>Purchased>Select "All"
    Note: Look out for apps that have the word "Update"
    http://i1224.photobucket.com/albums/ee374/Diavonex/9c256282736869f322d4b3071bbb2 a82_zps51a6f546.jpg

  • Many to many relationships (Again)

    Hello,
    There was a posting on above subject.
    Re: Many to many relationships between Fact and Dimension
    They asked to look chapter 3 in the user's guide... <http://download.oracle.com/docs/pdf/B10996_01.pdf>. chapter 3 talks about defining Oracle Data Objects. I could find above subject in chapter 3 .
    Here is our situation We are using OWB 9.2.0.2.8. We are in a situation to build ETL from denormalized (relational tables) source to normalized target (relational tables). It is not a data warehouse situation. It could be a reverse of data warehouse. As given below
    Supplier >--------------------<Item
    becomes Supplier ------<supp_item.>--------------Item after many to many resolution, Where supp_item is interface table.
    We were able build Supplier and Item through seprate mapping. I could build supp_item through post mapping process. I look for alternate thought as well.
    We are using separate sequence number for Supplier , Item and supp_item. The sequences will be surrogate keys such as Supplier ( Suppseq(PK)), Item (Itemseq (PK)) and supp_item(suppitemseq (PK)) Here is the sample
    Supplier
    001|S001
    002|S002
    003|S003
    004|S004
    Item
    001|I001
    002|I002
    003|I003
    Supp_item (Suppseq|ItemSeq)
    001|002 --- S001 I002
    001003 -----S001 I003
    001|004 ----- S001 I 004
    002|002 ---- S 002 I002
    002|003 ---- S 002 I003
    003|001 --- S 003 I 003
    003|003 --- S 003 I 003
    Did any body face such situation? What is the best way to create a mapping (single map or multiple map with processflow sequence) for this situation?
    Let me know the steps exercised in OWB for this situation.
    I appreciate your help.
    Regards
    Ram

    Hi Ram,
    The easiest way to do this, would be to:
    - Load supplier in one mapping and generate the surrogate key.
    - Load item another (or the same) mapping and generate the surrogate key.
    - Load supplier_item in its own separate mapping, using a key lookup (or join) to (with) the supplier and item tables.
    Needless to say, you should create unique keys on the natural key of the supplier and item tables, to enable quick index-based lookups and make sure you get one unique value for every value of the natural key.
    Hope this helps,
    Mark.

  • Struggling with a one to many relationship in a sub-report

    Post Author: Scott_tansley
    CA Forum: General
    I have a database schema as per below: tblENQUIRY                 tblDatasheets                  tblReportParasIRSID (PK)       1 --> &  IRSID (FK)                       UID (PK)Attribute1                     SHEETID (PK)     1 > &  SHEETID (FK)Attribute2                     Attribute1                         LIST_ORDER                         tblStandardParasAttribute3                     Attribute2                         PARA_CODE (FK)    & < 1   CODE     (PK)etc...                            Attribute3                                                                     TEXT                                   etc...
    The PROBLEM I am a Crystal Reports Newbie, and having to work through things bit by bitu2026  I've managed to achieve quite a lot, but I'm totally stuck with this and would appreciate some help. I need to create a report (essentially a letter and some datasheets) around a one-to-many relationship, which I have managed to compile using a main report (for the one &#91;tblENQUIRY&#93;) and sub report (for the many &#91;tblDatasheets&#93;).  Essentially I need a covering letter, then the u2018manyu2019 datasheets, and then a number of other pages (which are largely static text). I have created a main report which includes the covering letter, holds a subreport for the datasheets, and then contains the text for the additional pages.  This all works fine, and I get the correct number of datasheets for each main report. My problem stems from the use of this sub report.  This sub-report needs to hold some attribute values for each datasheet, which is fine.  However, on each datasheet page I need to have some paragraphs, which are held in another one to many relationship.  Each datasheet may have up to six paragraphs held as a code in tblReportParas, with a relationship to the text as held in tblStandardParas. My original thought would have been to embed another sub report, containing the values from tblStandardParas!TEXT, into the first sub report.  However, I have found that it is not possible to have a sub-report inside another sub-report.  I had seperated the first sub-report out from the main report, and then embedded another sub-report into it.  This worked fine until I tried to stitch the sub-report back into the main report (at which point the sub-sub-report dissapeared from view). I have therefore reworked my sub-report a little, and the attribution is now stored in a pageheader, with the tblStandardParas!TEXT in a detail section below it.  This almost works! The only problem is that there is no relationship between the pageheader and detail sections.  To clarify, I would expect to have one datasheet, with the attribution at the top, and then the six paras below.  Then, the same on the next page (assuming there is a second datasheet) for that report.  Instead, I get the correct attribution, but the detail section actually gives every paragraph in the database, no matter which datasheet/or report it related to!  I therefore need to limit the detail section to only show those paragraphs where the SHEETID in tblReportParas is the same as the tblDatasheets SHEETID. Any offers of advice would be appreciated.

    Post Author: Scott_tansley
    CA Forum: General
    I managed to resolve this myself in the end.  I moves the tblEnquiry data into report header/footer sections, this allowed me to add the tblDatasheets information into the details section, which gave me multiple pages - and then finally, the Paragraphs were added through the use of a sub report. 
    There's probably an even better way, but for now it works, it's quick - and so I'm going to go with it!
    Thanks for your interest.

  • How do I create a One to many relationship page in Dreamweaver?

    How do I create a page in dreamweaver that comes up after the user logs in from the log in page that will allow the user to:
    Add, change and delete in 2 tables that are in my MYSQL database that is a one to many relationship
    One thing that is confusing is how the foreign key that links to the one side of the relationship is created in the many side without the user inputting the foreign key each time adding information to the many side table.
    I am creating this in Dreamweaver using a MYSQL database and PHP.

    >Would the following be a part of it:
    >
    >Outer join
    Probably not. When updating/inserting/deleting from 2 tables you perform each seperately. Table updates may join two or more tables to resolve the correct row(s) but you still only update one table at a time. Procedurally you would create a transaction, update the first table, update the second table and then commit the transaction.
    EDIT: Well I take back my last comment. I see that MySQL does seem to support multiple table updates. I don't use MySQL so I can't really help you on that but the MySQL manual gives pretty clear syntax.

  • Defining a many-to-many relationship with CMP EJBs  : does it work for you

    Curious to know whether someone has been able to set up a many to many relationship between two entity beans.
    I have been struggling with this for days now and I can't get it to work.
    In my test project I have two entity beans, resp. Consultant and Solution.
    Consultant has a cmr field called 'solutions', which is a collection object from the opposite side (Solution).
    This is the source of the ejb-jar.xml file
    <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
    <!DOCTYPE ejb-jar PUBLIC "-//Sun Microsystems, Inc.//DTD Enterprise JavaBeans 2.0//EN" "http://java.sun.com/dtd/ejb-jar_2_0.dtd">
    <ejb-jar>
         <description>EJB JAR description</description>
         <display-name>EJB JAR</display-name>
         <enterprise-beans>
              <session>
                   <ejb-name>ProfilerBean</ejb-name>
                   <home>com.atosorigin.tcc.testing.ejbses.profiling.ProfilerHome</home>
                   <remote>com.atosorigin.tcc.testing.ejbses.profiling.Profiler</remote>
                   <local-home>com.atosorigin.tcc.testing.ejbses.profiling.ProfilerLocalHome</local-home>
                   <local>com.atosorigin.tcc.testing.ejbses.profiling.ProfilerLocal</local>
                   <ejb-class>com.atosorigin.tcc.testing.ejbses.profiling.ProfilerBean</ejb-class>
                   <session-type>Stateless</session-type>
                   <transaction-type>Container</transaction-type>
                   <ejb-local-ref>
                        <ejb-ref-name>EJBTesting/Solution</ejb-ref-name>
                        <ejb-ref-type>Entity</ejb-ref-type>
                        <local-home>com.atosorigin.tcc.testing.ejbcmp.profiling.SolutionLocalHome</local-home>
                        <local>com.atosorigin.tcc.testing.ejbcmp.profiling.SolutionLocal</local>
                        <ejb-link>SolutionBean</ejb-link>
                   </ejb-local-ref>
                   <ejb-local-ref>
                        <ejb-ref-name>EJBTesting/Consultant</ejb-ref-name>
                        <ejb-ref-type>Entity</ejb-ref-type>
                        <local-home>com.atosorigin.tcc.testing.ejbcmp.profiling.ConsultantLocalHome</local-home>
                        <local>com.atosorigin.tcc.testing.ejbcmp.profiling.ConsultantLocal</local>
                        <ejb-link>ConsultantBean</ejb-link>
                   </ejb-local-ref>
              </session>
              <entity>
                   <ejb-name>ConsultantBean</ejb-name>
                   <home>com.atosorigin.tcc.testing.ejbcmp.profiling.ConsultantHome</home>
                   <remote>com.atosorigin.tcc.testing.ejbcmp.profiling.Consultant</remote>
                   <local-home>com.atosorigin.tcc.testing.ejbcmp.profiling.ConsultantLocalHome</local-home>
                   <local>com.atosorigin.tcc.testing.ejbcmp.profiling.ConsultantLocal</local>
                   <ejb-class>com.atosorigin.tcc.testing.ejbcmp.profiling.ConsultantBean</ejb-class>
                   <persistence-type>Container</persistence-type>
                   <prim-key-class>java.lang.String</prim-key-class>
                   <reentrant>False</reentrant>
                   <cmp-version>2.x</cmp-version>
                   <abstract-schema-name>Consultant</abstract-schema-name>
                   <cmp-field>
                        <field-name>firstname</field-name>
                   </cmp-field>
                   <cmp-field>
                        <field-name>lastname</field-name>
                   </cmp-field>
                   <cmp-field>
                        <field-name>country</field-name>
                   </cmp-field>
                   <cmp-field>
                        <field-name>id</field-name>
                   </cmp-field>
                   <primkey-field>id</primkey-field>
                   <query>
                        <query-method>
                             <method-name>findBySolution</method-name>
                             <method-params>
                                  <method-param>java.lang.String</method-param>
                             </method-params>
                        </query-method>
                        <ejb-ql>SELECT Object(c) FROM Consultant AS c,
                        IN(c.solutions) s WHERE s.id = ?1 </ejb-ql>
                   </query>
              </entity>
              <entity>
                   <ejb-name>SolutionBean</ejb-name>
                   <home>com.atosorigin.tcc.testing.ejbcmp.profiling.SolutionHome</home>
                   <remote>com.atosorigin.tcc.testing.ejbcmp.profiling.Solution</remote>
                   <local-home>com.atosorigin.tcc.testing.ejbcmp.profiling.SolutionLocalHome</local-home>
                   <local>com.atosorigin.tcc.testing.ejbcmp.profiling.SolutionLocal</local>
                   <ejb-class>com.atosorigin.tcc.testing.ejbcmp.profiling.SolutionBean</ejb-class>
                   <persistence-type>Container</persistence-type>
                   <prim-key-class>java.lang.String</prim-key-class>
                   <reentrant>False</reentrant>
                   <cmp-version>2.x</cmp-version>
                   <abstract-schema-name>Solution</abstract-schema-name>
                   <cmp-field>
                        <field-name>description</field-name>
                   </cmp-field>
                   <cmp-field>
                        <field-name>name</field-name>
                   </cmp-field>
                   <cmp-field>
                        <field-name>parent</field-name>
                   </cmp-field>
                   <cmp-field>
                        <field-name>id</field-name>
                   </cmp-field>
                   <primkey-field>id</primkey-field>
                   <query>
                        <query-method>
                             <method-name>findChildSolutions</method-name>
                             <method-params>
                                  <method-param>java.lang.String</method-param>
                             </method-params>
                        </query-method>
                        <ejb-ql>SELECT Object(s) FROM Solution AS s WHERE
                        s.parent = ?1</ejb-ql>
                   </query>
                   <query>
                        <query-method>
                             <method-name>findTopLevelSolutions</method-name>
                             <method-params/>
                        </query-method>
                        <ejb-ql>Select Object(s) FROM Solution AS s WHERE
                        (s.parent = &apos;none&apos;)</ejb-ql>
                   </query>
              </entity>
         </enterprise-beans>
         <relationships>
              <ejb-relation>
                   <description>A consultant may have one or more areas of expertise</description>
                   <ejb-relation-name>Consultant_Solutions</ejb-relation-name>
                   <ejb-relationship-role>
                        <ejb-relationship-role-name>com.atosorigin.tcc.testing.ejbcmp.profiling.ConsultantBean</ejb-relationship-role-name>
                        <multiplicity>Many</multiplicity>
                        <relationship-role-source>
                             <ejb-name>ConsultantBean</ejb-name>
                        </relationship-role-source>
                        <cmr-field>
                             <cmr-field-name>solutions</cmr-field-name>
                             <cmr-field-type>java.util.Collection</cmr-field-type>
                        </cmr-field>
                   </ejb-relationship-role>
                   <ejb-relationship-role>
                        <ejb-relationship-role-name>com.atosorigin.tcc.testing.ejbcmp.profiling.SolutionBean</ejb-relationship-role-name>
                        <multiplicity>Many</multiplicity>
                        <relationship-role-source>
                             <ejb-name>SolutionBean</ejb-name>
                        </relationship-role-source>
                   </ejb-relationship-role>
              </ejb-relation>
         </relationships>
         <assembly-descriptor>
              <container-transaction>
                   <description>container-transaction</description>
                   <method>
                        <ejb-name>SolutionBean</ejb-name>
                        <method-name>*</method-name>
                   </method>
                   <method>
                        <ejb-name>ProfilerBean</ejb-name>
                        <method-name>*</method-name>
                   </method>
                   <method>
                        <ejb-name>ConsultantBean</ejb-name>
                        <method-name>*</method-name>
                   </method>
                   <trans-attribute>Required</trans-attribute>
              </container-transaction>
         </assembly-descriptor>
    </ejb-jar>
    I created a stateless session bean as a business facade for the two entity beans. I then created a webservice to test the beans.
    What works :
    - create a consultant
    - get a consultant
    - create a solution
    - get a solution
    (basically everything that doesn't involve the relationship field.
    However, what doesn't work is the method call assignSolution:
    - assign solution : this is implemented as follows
    Business Method.
         public void assignSolution(String consultantID, String solutionID)
              throws ProfilingException {
              // TODO : Implement
              ConsultantLocal cons = null;
              SolutionLocal sol = null;
              try {
                   cons = consHome.findByPrimaryKey(consultantID);
                   sol = solHome.findByPrimaryKey(solutionID);
                   Collection solutions = cons.getSolutions();
                   solutions.add(sol);
                   //sol.getConsultants().add(cons);
              } catch (FinderException ex) {
                   ex.printStackTrace();
                   throw new ProfilingException("failed to retrieve data from DB", ex);
    As you can see I am trying to use the CM Relationship in this methhod. Adding the solution to a consultant should be as simple as adding a solution object to the collection retrieved with the getSolutions accessor. The Container is expected to persist the information in my MAXDB database.
    However this doesn't happen.
    The ORM details as defined in the persistent.xml follows :
    <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
    <!DOCTYPE persistent-ejb-map SYSTEM "persistent.dtd">
    <persistent-ejb-map>
         <locking
              type="Table"/>
         <db-properties>
              <data-source-name>TCC_PORTAL_PROFILER</data-source-name>
              <database-vendor
                   name="SAPDB"/>
         </db-properties>
         <entity-beans>
              <entity-bean>
                   <ejb-name>ConsultantBean</ejb-name>
                   <table-name>PFL_CONSULTANTS</table-name>
                   <field-map
                        key-type="NoKey">
                        <field-name>firstname</field-name>
                        <column>
                             <column-name>FIRSTNAME</column-name>
                        </column>
                   </field-map>
                   <field-map
                        key-type="NoKey">
                        <field-name>lastname</field-name>
                        <column>
                             <column-name>LASTNAME</column-name>
                        </column>
                   </field-map>
                   <field-map
                        key-type="NoKey">
                        <field-name>country</field-name>
                        <column>
                             <column-name>COUNTRY</column-name>
                        </column>
                   </field-map>
                   <field-map
                        key-type="PrimaryKey">
                        <field-name>id</field-name>
                        <column>
                             <column-name>ID</column-name>
                        </column>
                   </field-map>
                   <finder-descriptor>
                        <method-name>findBySolution</method-name>
                        <method-params>
                             <method-param>java.lang.String</method-param>
                        </method-params>
                        <load-selected-objects
                             lock="read"/>
                   </finder-descriptor>
              </entity-bean>
              <entity-bean>
                   <ejb-name>SolutionBean</ejb-name>
                   <table-name>PFL_SAPSOLUTIONS</table-name>
                   <field-map
                        key-type="NoKey">
                        <field-name>description</field-name>
                        <column>
                             <column-name>DESCRIPTION</column-name>
                        </column>
                   </field-map>
                   <field-map
                        key-type="NoKey">
                        <field-name>name</field-name>
                        <column>
                             <column-name>NAME</column-name>
                        </column>
                   </field-map>
                   <field-map
                        key-type="NoKey">
                        <field-name>parent</field-name>
                        <column>
                             <column-name>PARENTID</column-name>
                        </column>
                   </field-map>
                   <field-map
                        key-type="PrimaryKey">
                        <field-name>id</field-name>
                        <column>
                             <column-name>ID</column-name>
                        </column>
                   </field-map>
                   <finder-descriptor>
                        <method-name>findChildSolutions</method-name>
                        <method-params>
                             <method-param>java.lang.String</method-param>
                        </method-params>
                        <load-selected-objects
                             lock="read"/>
                   </finder-descriptor>
                   <finder-descriptor>
                        <method-name>findTopLevelSolutions</method-name>
                        <method-params/>
                        <load-selected-objects
                             lock="read"/>
                   </finder-descriptor>
              </entity-bean>
         </entity-beans>
         <relationships>
              <table-relation>
                   <help-table>PFL_CONS_SOL_MAP</help-table>
                   <table-relationship-role
                        key-type="PrimaryKey">
                        <ejb-name>ConsultantBean</ejb-name>
                        <cmr-field>solutions</cmr-field>
                        <fk-column>
                             <column-name>CONSULTANTID</column-name>
                             <pk-field-name>id</pk-field-name>
                        </fk-column>
                   </table-relationship-role>
                   <table-relationship-role
                        key-type="PrimaryKey">
                        <ejb-name>SolutionBean</ejb-name>
                        <fk-column>
                             <column-name>SOLUTIONID</column-name>
                             <pk-field-name>id</pk-field-name>
                        </fk-column>
                   </table-relationship-role>
              </table-relation>
         </relationships>
    </persistent-ejb-map>
    The error in the default trace file when calling the method states, there is an "inconsistency in the number of primary keys". Details follow.
    #1.5#000F1F188E5C004400000000000010480003E76C80EFD57A#1098880364327#com.sap.engine.services.ejb#com.atosorigin.tcc/EJBCMPProfilingTest#com.sap.engine.services.ejb#Guest#2####4d2b2370281411d9a40d000f1f188e5c#SAPEngine_Application_Thread[impl:3]_31##0#0#Error##Java###
    [EXCEPTION]
    #1#com.sap.engine.services.ejb.exceptions.BaseRemoteException: Exception in method assignSolution.
         at com.atosorigin.tcc.testing.ejbses.profiling.ProfilerObjectImpl0.assignSolution(ProfilerObjectImpl0.java:822)
         at com.atosorigin.tcc.testing.ejbses.profiling.Profiler_Stub.assignSolution(Profiler_Stub.java:533)
         at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
         at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:39)
         at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:25)
         at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:324)
         at com.sap.engine.services.ejb.session.stateless_sp5.ObjectStubProxyImpl.invoke(ObjectStubProxyImpl.java:187)
         at $Proxy73.assignSolution(Unknown Source)
         at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
         at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:39)
         at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:25)
         at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:324)
         at com.sap.engine.services.webservices.runtime.EJBImplementationContainer.invokeMethod(EJBImplementationContainer.java:126)
         at com.sap.engine.services.webservices.runtime.RuntimeProcessor.process(RuntimeProcessor.java:146)
         at com.sap.engine.services.webservices.runtime.RuntimeProcessor.process(RuntimeProcessor.java:68)
         at com.sap.engine.services.webservices.runtime.servlet.ServletDispatcherImpl.doPost(ServletDispatcherImpl.java:92)
         at SoapServlet.doPost(SoapServlet.java:51)
         at javax.servlet.http.HttpServlet.service(HttpServlet.java:760)
         at javax.servlet.http.HttpServlet.service(HttpServlet.java:853)
         at com.sap.engine.services.servlets_jsp.server.HttpHandlerImpl.runServlet(HttpHandlerImpl.java:385)
         at com.sap.engine.services.servlets_jsp.server.HttpHandlerImpl.handleRequest(HttpHandlerImpl.java:263)
         at com.sap.engine.services.httpserver.server.RequestAnalizer.startServlet(RequestAnalizer.java:339)
         at com.sap.engine.services.httpserver.server.RequestAnalizer.startServlet(RequestAnalizer.java:317)
         at com.sap.engine.services.httpserver.server.RequestAnalizer.invokeWebContainer(RequestAnalizer.java:810)
         at com.sap.engine.services.httpserver.server.RequestAnalizer.handle(RequestAnalizer.java:238)
         at com.sap.engine.services.httpserver.server.Client.handle(Client.java:92)
         at com.sap.engine.services.httpserver.server.Processor.request(Processor.java:147)
         at com.sap.engine.core.service630.context.cluster.session.ApplicationSessionMessageListener.process(ApplicationSessionMessageListener.java:37)
         at com.sap.engine.core.cluster.impl6.session.UnorderedChannel$MessageRunner.run(UnorderedChannel.java:71)
         at com.sap.engine.core.thread.impl3.ActionObject.run(ActionObject.java:37)
         at java.security.AccessController.doPrivileged(Native Method)
         at com.sap.engine.core.thread.impl3.SingleThread.execute(SingleThread.java:94)
         at com.sap.engine.core.thread.impl3.SingleThread.run(SingleThread.java:162)
    Caused by: com.sap.engine.services.applocking.exception.SAPAppLockingIllegalArgumentException: Inconsistency in number of primary keys
         at com.sap.engine.services.applocking.TableLockingImpl.getArgument(TableLockingImpl.java:385)
         at com.sap.engine.services.applocking.TableLockingImpl.lock(TableLockingImpl.java:128)
         at com.sap.engine.services.applocking.TableLockingImpl.lock(TableLockingImpl.java:138)
         at com.sap.engine.services.ejb.entity.pm.lock.TableLockingSystem.write(TableLockingSystem.java:82)
         at com.sap.engine.services.ejb.entity.pm.PersistentM2M.create(PersistentM2M.java:172)
         at com.sap.engine.services.ejb.entity.pm.PersistentCacheM2M.add(PersistentCacheM2M.java:197)
         at com.sap.engine.services.ejb.entity.pm.multiple.CollectionM2M.add(CollectionM2M.java:57)
         at com.atosorigin.tcc.testing.ejbses.profiling.ProfilerBean.assignSolution(ProfilerBean.java:201)
         at com.atosorigin.tcc.testing.ejbses.profiling.ProfilerObjectImpl0.assignSolution(ProfilerObjectImpl0.java:771)
         ... 32 more
    I can't figure out what the problem is with the ORM mapping defined.
    On the database level I have three tables. Consultant maps to PFL_CONSULTANT, Solution to PFL_SAPSOLUTIONS. The third table PFL_CONS_SOL_MAP is the help table used for the relationship (having two fields, which are in fact foreign keys from the other two tables to express the assignment of solutions to consultants (where a consultant can have one or more solutions).
    ps. : I am running Netweaver Developer Workplace (Netweaver 2004, at stack level 5)
    Message was edited by: Theo Paesen

    Hm, after disabling 'automatic locking' it works.

Maybe you are looking for

  • FCServer noob, transcription, keywords, timecode and web deployment

    Hi all, My company has a potential job coming up where we will be shooting interviews and b-roll at many various locations around the country. Our client wants that footage to be accessible pretty quickly, in a searchable, web-friendly way. They want

  • BDLS cancelled in the midaway - urgent help needed

    Hello All, After refresh from production into test system, we ran BDLS in the test system for logical system name coneversion in background. But the job got aborted throwing some database error (as some other activity was going on and due to which ro

  • Email on N97 mini

    Hi all, can anyone help with setting up email on my phone. I have 2 problems with my setup. 1. When downloading emails to my phone, they also disappear off the server so won't download to my Outlook account, and 2. I have it set to delete emails afte

  • Help! seriously heavy processor issues for 'no reason'

    hi guys, i've inherited an AS3 project now compiled in FlashBuilder4 it's and Away3D / AwayBuilder based project which i've updated but the  problem is that it isn't overly complicated but something within it is  killing the memory and processors. I'

  • Alter database compared to alter system

    Hi all, Please,I think -and I hope I'm not wrong- that we use ALTER SYSTEM to modify the value of an initialization parameter.But when do we use alter database? Thanks.