Mapping Dock Version field in Shipment Create

Hi Guru's
i am facing problem in mapping dock version field in shipment create. Details are as fallows..............
Dock Version reference number is mapping to VTTK-TPBEZ(Shipment Description) from TIBCO. And the reqiure ment is there was a field VTTK-ZZVERSION (z field). I need to map VTTK-ZZVERSION field to (Basic type TPSSHT01)
Segment E1TPSHH-DESCRP which is typically linked to TPBEZ.
i have to make changes in the ZFM(Shipment Idoc Create). After executing the function module shipment will be created.
And when i run the Transacion VT03N in TAB IDENTIFICATION the "Shipment Description" field should be blank.
Thanks in advance..........

Hello.
I have no solution to your problem, but I have noticed something which I very much need. I want to be able to extract entries from JAR file which I specified in JNLP application descriptor. The word is about COM libraries which I want to copy and register on every client. But I have no chance to open JAR file which is specified in the JNLP app-desc.
In your code, you do this:
InputStream bla = clazz.getResourceAsStream();
which is not different from delegating the call directly to class' ClassLoader, which is the thing I do. I refer to the JAR file without path, like this:
InputStream huh = this.getClass().getClassLoader().getResourceAsStream("some.jar");
Returns null pointer. As far as I know (I tested it before) Java Web Start does not put its cache paths in "java.class.path" and "java.library.path" system properties, so I cannot hope to know certain path from which I could download my JAR.
So, is there a way to access those JAR files, to copy them locally somewhere, to extract files from them, etc?
Dimitar

Similar Messages

Missing version field in response from server when accessing resource

HY
I have a problem to use the version option of the webstart. All files are included into a war file (created with jar cvf xx.war *). This file is in the webapps folder of the Tomcat 5. The jar files from the dev. kit (jnlp-servlet.jar, jaxp.jar, parser.jar are in the WEB-INF/lib folder).
Every time I get the same message:
Category: Download Error
Missing version field in response from server when accessing resource: (http://localhost:8080/version/ademo.jar, 1.1)
Do I need a aditional file or must Iwrite a servlet???
Whats wrong
my JNLP file
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>

<jnlp codebase="http://localhost:8080/version/" href="wstest.jnlp">
<information>
<title>HJP3 WebStart Demo Application</title>
<vendor>Guido Krueger</vendor>
<homepage href="http://www.javabuch.de"/>
<description>HJP3 WebStart Demo Application</description>
<icon href="wstest.gif"/>
<offline-allowed/>
</information>
<information locale="de">
<description>HJP3 WebStart Demo-Applikation</description>
<offline-allowed/>
</information>
<security>

</security>
<resources>
<j2se version="1.4+"/>
<jar href="ademo.jar" version="1.1"/>
</resources>
<application-desc main-class="Listing3813"/>
</jnlp>
my version.xml file
<jnlp-versions>
<resource>
<pattern>
<name>ademo.jar</name>
<version-id>1.1</version-id>
</pattern>
<file>application.jar</file>
</resource>
</jnlp-versions>
my web.xml file
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE web-app PUBLIC "-//Sun Microsystems, Inc.//DTD Web Application 2.3//EN" "http://java.sun.com/dtd/web-app_2_3.dtd">
<web-app>
     <servlet>
          <servlet-name>JnlpDownloadServlet</servlet-name>
          <servlet-class>com.sun.javaws.servlet.JnlpDownloadServlet</servlet-class>
     </servlet>
     <servlet-mapping>
          <servlet-name>JnlpDownloadServlet</servlet-name>
          <url-pattern>*.jnlp</url-pattern>
     </servlet-mapping>
</web-app>

The log file (jnlpdownloadservlet.log) would show the calls for the jar files if the servlet is called for the jar files (did you correct the url mapping ?). Here are a few lines from a log file
JnlpDownloadServlet(4): Initializing
JnlpDownloadServlet(3): Request: /maportal/wfe/wfeguiv.jnlp
JnlpDownloadServlet(3): User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.6) Gecko/20040206 Firefox/0.8
JnlpDownloadServlet(4): DownloadRequest[path=/wfe/wfeguiv.jnlp isPlatformRequest=false]
JnlpDownloadServlet(4): Basic Protocol lookup
JnlpDownloadServlet(4): JnlpResource: JnlpResource[WAR Path: /wfe/wfeguiv.jnlp lastModified=Tue Mar 23 17:06:56 CET 2004]]
JnlpDownloadServlet(3): Resource returned: /wfe/wfeguiv.jnlp
JnlpDownloadServlet(4): lastModified: 1080058016000 Tue Mar 23 17:06:56 CET 2004
JnlpDownloadServlet(3): Request: /maportal/wfe/wfegui.gif
JnlpDownloadServlet(3): User-Agent: JNLP/1.0.1 javaws/1.4.2_03 (b02) J2SE/1.4.2_03
JnlpDownloadServlet(4): DownloadRequest[path=/wfe/wfegui.gif isPlatformRequest=false]
JnlpDownloadServlet(3): Request: /maportal/wfe/wfegui.jar
JnlpDownloadServlet(3): User-Agent: JNLP/1.0.1 javaws/1.4.2_03 (b02) J2SE/1.4.2_03
JnlpDownloadServlet(4): DownloadRequest[path=/wfe/wfegui.jar isPlatformRequest=false]
JnlpDownloadServlet(4): Basic Protocol lookup
JnlpDownloadServlet(4): JnlpResource: JnlpResource[WAR Path: /wfe/wfegui.jar lastModified=Tue Mar 23 17:06:30 CET 2004]]
JnlpDownloadServlet(3): Resource returned: /wfe/wfegui.jarYou should see all the resources (including jar files) being requested, and whether a specific version was requested or not (in above sample, not).
I put my problems down to my application server (Orion) as other people seem to have this working. The deployment in Orion keeps the original timestamps of the jars, so I explicitly set the timestamps in my build so that the unchanged jars do not have to be downloaded all the time. This is not really a good solution, so maybe someone else can give further advice.
Brendan

Missing version field

Hello everyone.
I have problem with version-download protocol. Every time I start up the application using JWS an error ocurred:Missing version field in response from server when accessing resource: (http://localhost:8080/PzP_Test/front01.jar, 1.0)
This is my web.xml code:
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE web-app PUBLIC '-//Sun Microsystems, Inc.//DTD Web Application 2.3//EN' 'http://java.sun.com/dtd/web-app_2_3.dtd'>
<web-app>
<display-name>PzP_Test</display-name>
<servlet>
    <servlet-name>JnlpDownloadServlet</servlet-name>
    <display-name>JnlpDownloadServlet</display-name>
    <servlet-class>com.sun.javaws.servlet.JnlpDownloadServlet</servlet-class>
    <init-param>
      <param-name>logLevel</param-name>
      <param-value>DEBUG</param-value>
    </init-param>
    <init-param>
      <param-name>logPath</param-name>
      <param-value>/jnlpdownloadservlet.log</param-value>
    </init-param>
</servlet>
<servlet-mapping>
    <servlet-name>JnlpDownloadServlet</servlet-name>
    <url-pattern>/PzP_Test/*</url-pattern>
</servlet-mapping>
<session-config>
    <session-timeout>30</session-timeout>
</session-config>
<mime-mapping>
    <extension>jar</extension>
    <mime-type>application/x-java-archive</mime-type>
</mime-mapping>
<mime-mapping>
    <extension>jnlp</extension>
    <mime-type>application/x-java-jnlp-file</mime-type>
</mime-mapping>
<welcome-file-list>
    <welcome-file>pzpj.jnlp</welcome-file>
</welcome-file-list>
</web-app>This is my jnlp file (the jnlp is creting dynamicly) :
jnlp.jsp
<%
response.setContentType("application/x-java-jnlp-file");
%>
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<jnlp spec="1.0+" codebase="http://localhost:8080/PzP_Test/" href="jnlp.jsp">
<information>
    <title>aaaa</title>
    <vendor>dddd/vendor>
    <homepage href="Login.jsp"/>
    <description>some text</description>
</information>
<security>
      <all-permissions/>
</security>
<resources>
    <j2se version="1.4+"/>
    <jar href="front01.jar" main="true" download="eager" version="1.0"/>
    <jar href="front02.jar" main="false" download="eager" version="1.0"/>
    <jar href="front03.jar" main="false" download="eager" version="1.0"/>
    <jar href="front04.jar" main="false" download="eager" version="1.0"/>
</resources>
<application-desc main-class="pl.dd.aa.DDD"/>
</jnlp>This is my version.xml file:
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<jnlp-versions>
      <resource>
         <pattern>
           <name>front01.jar</name>
            <version-id>1.0</version-id>
         </pattern>
         <file>front01.jar</file>
      </resource>
      <resource>
         <pattern>
           <name>front02.jar</name>
            <version-id>1.0</version-id>
         </pattern>
         <file>front02.jar</file>
      </resource>
      <resource>
         <pattern>
           <name>front03.jar</name>
            <version-id>1.0</version-id>
         </pattern>
         <file>front03.jar</file>
      </resource>
      <resource>
         <pattern>
           <name>front04.jar</name>
            <version-id>1.0</version-id>
         </pattern>
         <file>front04.jar</file>
      </resource>
   </jnlp-versions>And the PzP_Test.war file looks like this:
/PzP_Test/front01.jar
/PzP_Test/front02.jar
/PzP_Test/front03.jar
/PzP_Test/front04.jar
/PzP_Test/jnlp.jsp
/PzP_Test/version.xml
/PzP_Test/WEB-INF/web.xml
/PzP_Test/WEB-INF/lib/jnlp-servlet.jar
Any ideas!?

Ok I resolved it by myself. I have problems with mapping in web.xml file.
But now I have another problem. My jnlp file is created dynamicly. Jsp page create it. When I lunch my app using test.jnlp everything is working fine but when I want to start app with test.jsp then webstart doesn't start and the message occures "Save file as"
Has someon got any idea on this?

Is it possible to map the cmp fields of the entity bean with out dictionary

Dear sirs,
I have created the EJB project module and WEB Module. Now i have to map the CMP fields of the entity bean to the underlying table. Is it possible to map the cmp fields of the entity bean with out java dictionary? If yes how can we do that.
I have got some error while mapping an EJB's CMP fields to the table through dictionary. I was actually intended to map 79 fields but it gives an error that more than 64 fields are not allowed while building the dictionary.
1. Can you tell me what could be the possible reason?
2. Is it possible to map the cmp fields of the entity bean with out java dictionary? If yes how can we do that.
Kindly helo me,
Sudheesh K S

Hi,
Sudheesh please check up if the below link helps,there are other ways of writing the persistent.xml for container managed entity bean.
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw04s/helpdata/en/9b/f695f0c84acf46a4e0b31f69d8a9b7/frameset.htm, probably in the studio you cannot browse through tables not in the java dictionary,but manually editing it may still solve the problem.
Also here is another link that specifies the databases supported by J2EE Engine.
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw04s/helpdata/en/66/a5283eeb47b40be10000000a114084/frameset.htm
The below link shows how to specify the database vendor and datasource
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw04s/helpdata/en/e1/67fc3ee241ba28e10000000a114084/frameset.htm
Hope you are able to solve the problem.
Do let us know if you come up with the solution.
Regards,
Harish
Message was edited by: HARISH SUBRAMANIAN

Missing version field in response...( Tomcat, JBuilder )

Hello,
(Sorry for a long message, but I saw several times messages with the only
response like "write more details...")
I'm trying to execute a simple Web Start application using version-based download.
I'm constantly receiving the following error:
Missing version field in response from server when accessing resource:
(http://localhost:8083/checkboxcontrol/CheckBoxControl.jar, 1.1)
Is it possible that there is a bug somewhere within Web Start ?
The download is working in a basic version - the problem starts to occur when
I'm changing JNLP to:
<jar href="CheckBoxControl.jar" version="1.1"/>
Is there anybody that can help me ?
(I've read all past messages about "Missing version field in response...")
Below is all information about the case.
URL:
===================
http://localhost:8083/checkboxcontrol/CheckBoxControlLauncher.jnlp
Software configuration:
======================================
JBuilder 9 Enterprise Trial
Java Web Start 1.4.2
Tomcat 4.1 (included for debugging inside the JBuilder)
Windows NT 4.0 SP6a
Mozilla Firebird 0.6.1
Please note that I've tried also with IBM Websphere 4 - the same result.
JNLP file:
===================
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<jnlp spec="1.0+" codebase="http://localhost:8083/checkboxcontrol">
<information>
<title>CheckBox Example</title>
<vendor>Borland</vendor>
<homepage href="CheckBoxControlLauncher.html" />
<description>Web Start Example for CheckBoxControl</description>
</information>
<resources>
<j2se version="1.3+" />
<jar href="CheckBoxControl.jar" version="1.1"/>
</resources>
<application-desc main-class="com.borland.samples.swing.checkboxcontrol.Application1" />
</jnlp>
File directory contents:
========================
.\Lib (empty)
.\WEB-INF
->\classes
->->\checkboxcontrol
->->->\WEB-INF
->->->->\Lib
->->->->->\jardiff.jar
->->->->->\jnlp-servlet.jar
->->->->->\jnlp.jar
->->\classes\com\borland\samples\swing\checkboxcontrol\
->->->\Application1.class
->->->\Frame1$1.class
->->->\Frame1$2.class
->->->\Frame1$3.class
->->->\Frame1$4.class
->->->\Frame1$5.class
->->->\Frame1.class
->\lib
->->\jardiff.jar
->->\jnlp-servlet.jar
->->\jnlp.jar
->\web.xml
CheckBoxControl.jar
CheckBoxControlLauncher.html
CheckBoxControlLauncher.jnlp
CheckBoxControl__V1.1.jar
version.xml
web.xml contents:
===================
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE web-app PUBLIC "-//Sun Microsystems, Inc.//DTD Web Application 2.3//EN"
"http://java.sun.com/dtd/web-app_2_3.dtd">
<web-app>
<servlet>
<servlet-name>JnlpDownloadServlet</servlet-name>
<servlet-class>com.sun.javaws.servlet.JnlpDownloadServlet</servlet-class>
</servlet>
[... cut ....]
<servlet-mapping>
<servlet-name>JnlpDownloadServlet</servlet-name>
<url-pattern>*.jnlp</url-pattern>
</servlet-mapping>
<mime-mapping>
<extension>jar</extension>
<mime-type>application/x-java-archive</mime-type>
</mime-mapping>
<mime-mapping>
<extension>jnlp</extension>
<mime-type>application/x-java-jnlp-file</mime-type>
</mime-mapping>
</web-app>
version.xml contents:
======================================
<jnlp-versions>
<resource>
<pattern>
<name>CheckBoxControl.jar</name>
<version-id>1.1</version-id>
</pattern>
<file>CheckBoxControl.jar</file>
</resource>
</jnlp-versions>
Stack trace:
===================
JNLPException[category: Download Error : Exception: null : LaunchDesc: null ]
     at com.sun.javaws.cache.DownloadProtocol.doDownload(DownloadProtocol.java:566)
     at com.sun.javaws.cache.DownloadProtocol.getDownloadSize(DownloadProtocol.java:850)
     at com.sun.javaws.LaunchDownload.downloadJarFiles(LaunchDownload.java:580)
     at com.sun.javaws.LaunchDownload.downloadEagerorAll(LaunchDownload.java:544)
     at com.sun.javaws.Launcher.downloadResources(Launcher.java:735)
     at com.sun.javaws.Launcher.handleApplicationDesc(Launcher.java:291)
     at com.sun.javaws.Launcher.handleLaunchFile(Launcher.java:199)
     at com.sun.javaws.Launcher.run(Launcher.java:167)
     at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:534)

I took a scan through what you posted and it looked OK - it has to be something simple. Sometimes it helps to compare against a working system - try looking at ScheduleWorld's jnlp.

Message Mapping - SUM a field per unique combination of 2 other fields?

I'm receiving a proxy with detail records, and I need to create a subtotals file. Here an example:
BEFORE MAPPING
   <ROW>
      <KOSTL>0000010300</KOSTL>
      <POSID>DUMMY</POSID>
      <FTE>0.51</FTE>
   </ROW>
   <ROW>
      <KOSTL>0000010400</KOSTL>
      <POSID>123</POSID>
      <FTE>0.49</FTE>
   </ROW>
   <ROW>
      <KOSTL>0000010400</KOSTL>
      <POSID>DUMMY</POSID>
      <FTE>0.72</FTE>
   </ROW>
   <ROW>
      <KOSTL>0000010400</KOSTL>
      <POSID>123</POSID>
      <FTE>0.82</FTE>
   </ROW>
   <ROW>
      <KOSTL>0000010300</KOSTL>
      <POSID>DUMMY</POSID>
      <FTE>0.18</FTE>
   </ROW>
AFTER MAPPING:
   <ROW>
      <KOSTL>0000010300</KOSTL>
      <POSID>DUMMY</POSID>
      <FTE>0.59</FTE>
   </ROW>
   <ROW>
      <KOSTL>0000010400</KOSTL>
      <POSID>123</POSID>
      <FTE>1.31</FTE>
   </ROW>
   <ROW>
      <KOSTL>0000010400</KOSTL>
      <POSID>DUMMY</POSID>
      <FTE>0.72</FTE>
   </ROW>
How do I create a new record for all unquie combinations of KOSTL and POSID? And total the FTE field for each line? Can this be done in a message mapping?

Hello,
How do I create a new record for all unquie combinations of KOSTL and POSID? And total the FTE field for each line? Can this be done in a message mapping?
Yes, very much possible with or without UDF. See sample mapping below without using UDF:
For ROW:
KOSTL(set context to row) -> concat: -> sort: case insensitive ascending -> splitByValue:valueChanged -> collapseContext -> ROW
POSID(set context to row) -> /
For KOSTL:
KOSTL(set context to row) -> concat: ----------------> sortByKey: case insensitive ascending -> formatByExample -> collapseContext -> splitByValue:eachValue -> KOSTL
POSID(set context to row) -> /      KOSTL(set context to row) ->/                                          /
KOSTL(set context to row) -> concat: -> sort: case insensitive ascending -> splitByValue:valueChanged -> /
POSID(set context to row) -> /
For POSID:
KOSTL(set context to row) -> concat: ----------------> sortByKey: case insensitive ascending -> formatByExample -> collapseContext -> splitByValue:eachValue -> POSID
POSID(set context to row) -> /      POSID(set context to row) ->/                                          /
KOSTL(set context to row) -> concat: -> sort: case insensitive ascending -> splitByValue:valueChanged -> /
POSID(set context to row) -> /
For FTE:
KOSTL(set context to row) -> concat: ----------------> sortByKey: case insensitive ascending -> formatByExample -> sum -> splitByValue:eachValue -> FTE
POSID(set context to row) -> /      FTE(set context to row) ->/                                            /
KOSTL(set context to row) -> concat: -> sort: case insensitive ascending -> splitByValue:valueChanged -> /
POSID(set context to row) -> /
Hope this helps,
Mark

How to create a duplicate of the Manager ID field in the Create user menu

Hi,
I´m trying to create a duplicate of the Manager ID field in the Create user menu (with a different label). I need to add it a field with the same funtionality of the Manager ID field (search users with filters) but I don´t know how.
I try to made a new adapter using the Thor.API.Operations.tcUserOperationsIntf but it don´t let me to map the input parameters.
Also I try to assing an existent Lookup to a new UDF, but I couldn´t find the correct one.
Did anybody do that??
Thanks!

Hi Kevin,
First I created a a user defined field called USR_UDF_CONDUCTOR (Lookupfield type).
Then I added the following lines to de FormMetaData.xml file:
</Attribute name="-750" label="global.label.conductor" displayComponentType="LookupField" variantType="long" dataLength="50" map="USR_UDF_CONDUCTOR">
<ValidValues lookupMethod="findUsersFiltered" operationClass="Thor.API.Operations.tcUserOperationsIntf" displayColumns="Users.User ID,Users.Last Name,Users.First Name" selectionColumn="Users.User ID"/>
</Attribute>
<AttributeReference editable="true" optional="true">-750</AttributeReference>
When I try yo Create a new user, the OIM System Administrator returns a System Error.

How to Map Proces form field with Resource form field?

Hi,
How to Map Proces form field with Resource form field while creating Process form in Form designer

Are you talking about Provisioning ?
then you do that in Data Flow under Process Defintion in OIM 10g
In OIM 11g you use Request Dataset. In that you can directly map fields to process form.

Optimistic Locking fails when version field is part of a Aggregate

I'm trying to persist a Mapped Object using 9.0.3 Toplink.
The object uses optimistic locking while the Timestamp versioning field is part of an Aggreate Descriptor. This works well in the Workbench (does not complain).
Unfortunally it does not work whenever I use the UnitOfWork to register and commit the chances.
Sample code:
Object original;
UnitOfWork unitOfWork = ...
Object clone =   unitOfWork.registerExistingObject(original);
clone.setBarcode("bliblalbu");
unitOfWork.commit();This throws an nasty OptimisticLockException, complaining about a missing versioning field:
LOCAL EXCEPTION STACK:
EXCEPTION [TOPLINK-5004] (TopLink - 9.0.3 (Build 423)): oracle.toplink.exceptions.OptimisticLockException
EXCEPTION DESCRIPTION: An attempt was made to update the object [BusinessObject:{id:12382902,shorttext:null,barcode:bliblablu,ownerLocation:null,IdEntryName:0,idCs:20579121}], but it has no version number in the identity map.
It may not have been read before the update was attempted.
CLASS> de.grob.wps.domain.model.BusinessObjectBO PK> [12382902]
     at oracle.toplink.exceptions.OptimisticLockException.noVersionNumberWhenUpdating(Unknown Source)
     at oracle.toplink.descriptors.VersionLockingPolicy.addLockValuesToTranslationRow(Unknown Source)
     at oracle.toplink.internal.queryframework.DatabaseQueryMechanism.updateObjectForWrite(Unknown Source)
     at oracle.toplink.queryframework.WriteObjectQuery.executeCommit(Unknown Source)
     at oracle.toplink.internal.queryframework.DatabaseQueryMechanism.executeWrite(Unknown Source)
     at oracle.toplink.queryframework.WriteObjectQuery.execute(Unknown Source)
     at oracle.toplink.queryframework.DatabaseQuery.execute(Unknown Source)
     at oracle.toplink.publicinterface.Session.internalExecuteQuery(Unknown Source)
     at oracle.toplink.publicinterface.UnitOfWork.internalExecuteQuery(Unknown Source)
     at oracle.toplink.publicinterface.Session.executeQuery(Unknown Source)
     at oracle.toplink.publicinterface.Session.executeQuery(Unknown Source)
     at oracle.toplink.internal.sessions.CommitManager.commitAllObjects(Unknown Source)
     at oracle.toplink.publicinterface.Session.writeAllObjects(Unknown Source)
     at oracle.toplink.publicinterface.UnitOfWork.commitToDatabase(Unknown Source)
     at oracle.toplink.publicinterface.UnitOfWork.commitRootUnitOfWork(Unknown Source)
     at oracle.toplink.publicinterface.UnitOfWork.commitAndResume(Unknown Source)
     at de.grob.wps.dwarf.domainstore.toplink.ToplinkTransaction.commit(ToplinkTransaction.java:60)
     at de.grob.wps.dwarf.domainstore.toplink.ToplinkPersistenceManager.commit(ToplinkPersistenceManager.java:396)
     at de.grob.wps.dwarf.domainstore.toplink.ToplinkPersistenceManagerTest.testPersistSerializableWithBusinessObjects(ToplinkPersistenceManagerTest.java:87)
     at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
     at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:39)
     at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:25)
     at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:324)
     at junit.framework.TestCase.runTest(TestCase.java:154)
     at junit.framework.TestCase.runBare(TestCase.java:127)
     at junit.framework.TestResult$1.protect(TestResult.java:106)
     at junit.framework.TestResult.runProtected(TestResult.java:124)
     at junit.framework.TestResult.run(TestResult.java:109)
     at junit.framework.TestCase.run(TestCase.java:118)
     at junit.framework.TestSuite.runTest(TestSuite.java:208)
     at junit.framework.TestSuite.run(TestSuite.java:203)
     at org.eclipse.jdt.internal.junit.runner.RemoteTestRunner.runTests(RemoteTestRunner.java:392)
     at org.eclipse.jdt.internal.junit.runner.RemoteTestRunner.run(RemoteTestRunner.java:276)
     at org.eclipse.jdt.internal.junit.runner.RemoteTestRunner.main(RemoteTestRunner.java:167)So what can I to fix this problem? BTW the Object I try to persists has been read from database and the IDE debugger shows what that the aggregate object contains java.sql.Timestamp instances.

Sorry guys. My debugger fooled me. The locking field wasn't initialized in the database. This caused the problem which is fixed now.
Thx anyway.
Bye
Toby

Object ID and Object ID Version fields in Displaying Object Properties - XI

Hi,
In displaying Object Properties in XI we can see different fields like Type, Description, SCV, Object ID, Object ID Version, Status, Person Responsible, Changed On, Changed By, Display Language, Original Language.
But when i refer to the SAP Library documentation for these fields, Object ID and Object ID Version are not included. Here is the link for the documentation
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw04/helpdata/en/f0/fc9a3de2ec0753e10000000a114084/frameset.htm
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw04s/helpdata/en/f0/fc9a3de2ec0753e10000000a114084/frameset.htm
With that said, i have no information on those two fields, only assumptions i've made that i would like to verify in this forum with the questions below
1.
Please correct me if i'm wrong, the Object ID is the unique identifier for the object and the Object ID Version is directly connected with the versioning concept for IR and ID, so the Object ID is generated when you create the object (e.g. MM) and the Object ID Version changes every time that object is edited and change list activated for it. Is this correct?
Or does the Object ID change every time the object is edited and change list activated for it?
What is the behavior of these two fields when transported? e.g. dev to qa... are they both retained on the target IB's? (specifically for ID objects because the change list needs to be activated first on the target ID)
2.
Does any one know where the Object ID and Object ID Version gets stored? (saved on a table in the ABAP stack or saved somewhere in the Java stack? e.g. can be viewed in Visual Admin or a URL) I am thinking of extracting all the XI objects with their corresponding Object ID and Object ID Version (per system) in one step. I know this is possible only if the Object ID & Object ID Version are stored in an ABAP table...
Kindly give me some inputs.
Please answer directly with the questions above. I will reward points for it.
Thanks in advance.

HI,
>Please correct me if i'm wrong, the Object ID is the unique identifier for the object and the Object ID Version is directly connected with the versioning concept for IR and ID, so the Object ID is generated when you create the object (e.g. MM) and the Object ID Version changes every time that object is edited and change list activated for it. Is this correct?
The Object Id is created the first time you create the object.
Object Version Id is created the first time you save/activate a object.
Now suppose if you modify the object a new Object Version Id will be created but the Object ID will remain the same.
For IR Objects the Object Id & Object Version ID will remain the same across systems.
For ID Objects the Object Id & Object Version ID is not the same across systems.
Not sure about the table. Can you try in SE11 and check all tables with SXMS*. Could be also that tables might not be available from GUI i.e you might have to login to DB to find out.
Regards,
Sumit

Version Based Downloading w/JBoss Missing Version Field....

Here we go again, version based downloading difficulties.
I cannot get version based downloading to work using the version.xml file or using file based versioning.
My environment is
JBoss 4.0.3 SP1 (whatever version of tomcat container this contains)
JRE 1.5.0_06
I have a .ear file which contains a .war file which contains the appropriate folder format and loose application jars, html, jnlp, etc., as described in the "Packaging JNLP Applications in a Web Archive" document.
My web.xml file looks like this:
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<web-app xmlns="http://java.sun.com/xml/ns/j2ee"
    xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"
    xsi:schemaLocation="http://java.sun.com/xml/ns/j2ee http://java.sun.com/xml/ns/j2ee/web-app_2_4.xsd"
    version="2.4">
<display-name>TotalZilla</display-name>
<description> TotalVU application </description>
   <servlet>
      <servlet-name>JnlpDownloadServlet</servlet-name>
      <servlet-class>jnlp.sample.servlet.JnlpDownloadServlet</servlet-class>
           <init-param>
              <param-name>logLevel</param-name>
              <param-value>DEBUG</param-value>
           </init-param>
           <init-param>
              <param-name>logPath</param-name>
              <param-value>jnlpdownloadservlet.log</param-value>
           </init-param>
   </servlet>
      <servlet-mapping>
     <servlet-name>JnlpDownloadServlet</servlet-name>
     <url-pattern>*.jnlp</url-pattern>
   </servlet-mapping>
</web-app>
]NOTE: changing the <url-pattern> value to anything but *.jnlp causes JBoss to throw an exception during application deployment[i]
My version.xml file looks like this:
I believe this to be the culprit but I am at a loss as to why.
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<jnlp-versions>
      <resource>
         <pattern>
           <name>utilities.jar</name>
            <version-id>1.0</version-id>
         </pattern>
         <file>utilities.jar</file>
      </resource>
      <resource>
         <pattern>
           <name>totalvu.jar</name>
            <version-id>2.0</version-id>
         </pattern>
         <file>totalvu.jar</file>
      </resource>
      <resource>
         <pattern>
           <name>images.jar</name>
            <version-id>1.0</version-id>
         </pattern>
         <file>images.jar</file>
      </resource>
      <resource>
         <pattern>
           <name>common.jar</name>
            <version-id>1.0</version-id>
         </pattern>
         <file>common.jar</file>
      </resource>
   </jnlp-versions>
My jnlp file looks like this:
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<jnlp
spec="1.0+"
codebase="$$codebase"
href="$$name" context="$$context">
<information>
    <title>Total VU Application</title>
    <vendor>Perimeter Aquisition Corp.</vendor>
    <homepage href="docs/totalvu.html"/>
    <description>TotalVU application from Perimeter</description>
    <description kind="short">The perfect application.</description>
    <offline-allowed/>
     <shortcut online="false">
      <desktop/>
      <menu submenu="Perimeter - TotalVU"/>
    </shortcut>
</information>
   <security>
      <all-permissions/>
</security>
<resources>
     <j2se version="1.5.0+"/>
    <jar href="totalvu.jar" version="1.0+"/>
    <jar href="utilities.jar" version="1.0"/>
    <jar href="common.jar" version="1.0"/>
    <jar href="images.jar" version="1.0"/>
    <jar href="jlfgr-1_0.jar"/>
    <jar href="jboss-j2ee.jar"/>
    <jar href="jnpserver.jar"/>
    <jar href="jboss-common-client.jar"/>
    <jar href="jbossmq.jar"/>
    <jar href="concurrent.jar"/>
    <jar href="swing-worker.jar"/>
    <jar href="log4j.jar"/>
    <extension name="Sun Signed Jars" href="sunsignedjars.jnlp"/>
</resources>
<application-desc main-class="com.perimeter.totalvu.framework.TotalVU"/>
</jnlp>
The other jnlp file (temporary) which contains a version of activation.jar signed by sun looks like this:
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
    <jnlp spec="1.0+"
      codebase="$$codebase"
      href="$$name"
      context="$$context">
    <information>
        <title>SunSignedJars</title>
        <vendor>Sun Microsystems, Inc.</vendor>
        <description>Jars signed by Sun Microsystems</description>
    </information>
    <security>
      <all-permissions/>
    </security>
    <resources>
        <jar href="activation.jar"/>
    </resources>
   <component-desc>
   </component-desc>
</jnlp>
My war file (which is in an ear file) has this format:
META-INF\MANIFEST.MF
WEB-INF\lib\jnlp-servlet.jar
WEB-INF\lib\jardiff.jar
WEB-INF\lib\jnlp.jar
version.xml
*.jar
*.jnlp
*.html
This configuration spits out the famous "Missing version field from server....." that I have seen many times in this forum. The download servlet is getting executed because I am getting a log file generated every time. Debug is the only value that will put out a log. The log output looks like this:
JnlpDownloadServlet(3): Request: /totalvu/totalvu.jnlp
JnlpDownloadServlet(3): User-Agent: JNLP/1.5 javaws/1.5.0_06 (b05) J2SE/1.5.0_06
JnlpDownloadServlet(4): DownloadRequest[path=/totalvu.jnlp isPlatformRequest=false]
JnlpDownloadServlet(4): Basic Protocol lookup
JnlpDownloadServlet(4): JnlpResource: JnlpResource[WAR Path: /totalvu.jnlp lastModified=Mon Dec 05 11:17:46 EST 2005]]
JnlpDownloadServlet(3): Resource returned: /totalvu.jnlp
JnlpDownloadServlet(4): SupportQuery in Href: true
JnlpDownloadServlet(4): lastModified: 1133799466000 Mon Dec 05 11:17:46 EST 2005
JnlpDownloadServlet(3): Request: /totalvu/sunsignedjars.jnlp
JnlpDownloadServlet(3): User-Agent: JNLP/1.5 javaws/1.5.0_06 (b05) J2SE/1.5.0_06
JnlpDownloadServlet(4): DownloadRequest[path=/sunsignedjars.jnlp isPlatformRequest=false]
JnlpDownloadServlet(4): Basic Protocol lookup
JnlpDownloadServlet(4): JnlpResource: JnlpResource[WAR Path: /sunsignedjars.jnlp lastModified=Mon Dec 05 10:00:20 EST 2005]]
JnlpDownloadServlet(3): Resource returned: /sunsignedjars.jnlp
JnlpDownloadServlet(4): SupportQuery in Href: true
JnlpDownloadServlet(4): lastModified: 1133794820000 Mon Dec 05 10:00:20 EST 2005If I remove the version= tag from the main jnlp file, everything loads fine, but there is no versioning. I have also tried to remove the version.xml file from the package and change my jar files to use file based versioning, but that didn't work either. I rebuilt my jar files with the __V1.0 extension and the complaint was that it couldn't load the resource totalvu.jar. Well, ya, it is now named totalvu__V1.0.jar! Again, versioning is being ignored. The double underscore and V was not recognized as anything special.
The servlet is running long enough to spit out a log file, no errors. It looks like it succesfully processed the jnlp files, but there is no indication of any versioning.
Doe the jnlp.jar and jardiff.jar files need to be included in the lib folder in the .war file? I am only including the jnlp-servlet.jar. They were not referenced in the example war file in the documentation, but I have seen them referenced in older doc for other app servers. I did try including them, but it made no difference of course. Guess this question is just a housekeeping question.
Does anyone have any insight on this problem?
I am at the point where I think I would like to get the source and debug through it to see what is going on, but that should be unecessary.

Thanks. I had the same problem.
As danrak suggests, just add this to your web.xml file to parse .jar and/or .zip file extensions:
<servlet-mapping>
<servlet-name>JnlpDownloadServlet</servlet-name>
<url-pattern>*.zip</url-pattern>
</servlet-mapping>
<servlet-mapping>
<servlet-name>JnlpDownloadServlet</servlet-name>
<url-pattern>*.jar</url-pattern>
</servlet-mapping>

JWS1.2 & Missing version field in response

I must say that the guys with JWS1.2 have done well in getting around the proxy issues with the previous versions. However, its disappointing to see this error still occuring when you perform a version based download which is one of the most useful pieces of functionality in JWS (see quote below) . So when a cleint has proxy issues its goodbye 'Bad MIME type error' and hello 'Missing version field in response from server when accessing resource'. Is this really progress? Surely most people use version based downloads?
Will this be fixed for 1.4.1 final and / or does anybody know of a workaround? I've included a previous quote, our jnlp, errors and stack dump below.
Many thanks
Ian
Quote from dietz Jul9, 2002
"The problem is probably that your proxy server is not passing on the correct mime type. Some proxy servers (I'm sorry I don't remember which ones) will only pass on mime types that they are aware of, and will substitute text/html, for others. This should be no problem when using Java Web Start 1.2, since it itself does not require that jnlp files download come with the proper mime type. You may still have a problem using these proxy servers if you are running a servlet implementing the jardiff (incremental update) protocol, since Java Web Start may use the mime type to differenciate between jar files (application/x-java-archive) and jardiff files (application/x-java-archive-diff) "
An error occurred while launching/running the application.
Title: OS MasterMap Viewer
Vendor: Snowflake Software
Category: Download Error
Missing version field in response from server when accessing resource: (http://www.snowflakesoft.co.uk/app/viewer.jar, 1.1)
Stack dump:
JNLPException[category: Download Error : Exception: null : LaunchDesc: null ]      at com.sun.javaws.cache.DownloadProtocol.doDownload(Unknown Source)      at com.sun.javaws.cache.DownloadProtocol.getDownloadSize(Unknown Source)      at com.sun.javaws.LaunchDownload.downloadJarFiles(Unknown Source)      at com.sun.javaws.LaunchDownload.downloadEagerorAll(Unknown Source)      at com.sun.javaws.Launcher.downloadResources(Unknown Source)      at com.sun.javaws.Launcher.handleApplicationDesc(Unknown Source)      at com.sun.javaws.Launcher.handleLaunchFile(Unknown Source)      at com.sun.javaws.Launcher.run(Unknown Source)      at java.lang.Thread.run(Unknown Source)
JNLP:
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<jnlp spec="1.0+" codebase="http://www.snowflakesoft.co.uk/app/" href="viewer.jnlp">
<information>
<title>OS MasterMap Viewer</title>
     <vendor>Snowflake Software</vendor>
     <description kind="one-line">A Java based map viewer for OS MasterMap</description>
     <description kind="short">A Java based viewer for OS MasterMap capable of reading both Topology and Independent Polygons in either GZip, WinZip or uncompressed GML</description>
     <description kind="tooltip">OS MasterMap Viewer</description>
     <homepage href="http://www.snowflakesoft.co.uk"/>
     <icon width="64" height="64" href="images/SnowflakeLogo64.gif"/>
     <icon width="32" height="32" href="images/SnowflakeLogo32.gif"/>
     <icon kind="splash" href="images/SnowflakeSplash.gif"/>
     <offline-allowed/>
</information>
     <security>
          <all-permissions/>
     </security>
<resources>
     <j2se version="1.3*" href="http://java.sun.com/products/autodl/j2se" initial-heap-size="8m" max-heap-size="1024m"/>
     <j2se version="1.4*" href="http://java.sun.com/products/autodl/j2se" initial-heap-size="8m" max-heap-size="1024m"/>
     <jar href="viewer.jar" version="1.1"/>
</resources>
<application-desc main class="uk.co.snowflakesoft.jme.application.Viewer"/>
</jnlp>

Version based download protocol is not available with vanila web server.
You need to either run some form of script, jsp, or a servlet such as the JNLPDownloadServlet included in the developers pack, to return the requested version, and with the version information.
If you are currently running the servlet you may still be having problem with your proxy having security settings that prohibit sending the additional version information on to the client, although I have never heard of this before.
/Dietz

Mapping too many fields can cause load on the system?

Hi Experts,
I have a question about a mapping .. I am mapping an IDOC to a web-service. The Web-service structure is having the exact same structure as the idoc, but all the fields are not necessary. But the Owner of the web-service is requesting me to map all fields even though it is not required. So my question is ,Will this unwanted field mappings can create an overload/burden on xi system ? I am getting the idoc from an R/3 system and then I use a BPM to send it to web-service to send the invoice to ORACLE ERP and the response I am getting is used to update the status of IDOC in R/3. Your thoughts on this please..
Thanks

Hi,
normally a standard mapping (I guess graphical) which is 1:1 will definetely not cause any performace issues! Sometimes negative effects are experienced with very complex mappings and many transformations, calculations, value-based actions, etc. Even XSLTs and large mssages could be a problem, because each time the whole message is read. In such cases JAVA mappings may help.
But your case all should be fine ;o)
Regards,
Kai

Value mapping with 1000 fields?

Hi
We are having 1000 fields and trying to map using value mapping,
How to map these 1000 fields automatically without entering manuvally using value mapping?
thanq
krishna

HI krishna,
I would prepare a csv with key values and upload them in "imported archive".
Now in message mapping create UDF and read the imported archiv:
try {
     InputStream fstream = this.getClass().getClassLoader().getResourceAsStream(fileName);
     DataInputStream in = new DataInputStream(fstream);
     BufferedReader br = new BufferedReader(new InputStreamReader(in));
     String strLine;
     // Read File Line By Line
     while ((strLine = br.readLine()) != null) {
          String ValueLeft = strLine.substring(0, strLine.indexOf(";"));
          if (WertLinks.equals(key)) {
               return (strLine.substring(strLine.indexOf(";")+1, strLine.length()));
          }//if
     }// while
     // Close the input stream
     in.close();
     return "no Value found; check CSV : " + key;
} catch (Exception e) {// Catch exception if any
     return "Error: " + e.getMessage();
The import-paremeters for UDF are:
- key
- fileName
Regards Mario
Edited by: Mario Müller on Apr 24, 2008 8:27 AM

Add a custom tab to include custom fields in Shipment Screen (VT03N)

Hello every one,
We have a requirement to add a custom tab to include custom fields in shipment header.
Can any one of you help me on this?
Thanks in advance !!!
Regards,
Ganga

Hi Ganga,
This is the question of customer exit....you will get very good links on the forum itself...but i can give you some hint:
1. fing out the package or program name for the transaction(by gng in the setting)
2. go to se84 and in the enhancement->customer exit tab...with the help of pkg name got above find out the various enhacement for this tcode.
3.find out the appropriate one by putting in the break point.
4. You can get an exit with a screen exit where you will create your own screen(with the custom field if.....then you have to append them in the table) or with the std fields.
5. there you will get the fm exit for PBO and PAI as well.
Hope this might help you in solving the problem.
Pooja

Mapping Dock Version field in Shipment Create

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for