Mapping issue with Qualifier table

Hi,
1. I have an issue after mapping all 3 non-qual flds of a qualifier table in main table getting the compound fld enabled but selecting it , not mapping automatically to the appropiate compound field in the destination side, but giving an error message
"unable to retrieve source record".
2. The second issue is that after mapping some of the fields and qualified table and loading the maintable data, saving the map but subsequently when trying to open the saved map , it is coming out with the usual main error window
SAP MDM Import Manager
SAP Import manager has encountered a problem and needs to close.
We are sorry for the inconvenience.
Debug Close
Appreciate your help/suggestion on this issues.
regards
-reo

Answer for Qn2:
First you have to map all the display fields to individual Source Fields..
Once you have mapped all the dispaly fields of the Qualified Table, you have to do value mapping for the Fields that require Value Mapping.
Ex: Source Field A -> Destination Display Field 1
Source Field B -> Destination Display Field 2
Source Field C -> Destination Display Field 3
Now Value Mapping where required should be done.
Once the value mapping is done, then you can create a Compound Field.
If you have done the previous steps correclty, then the compound field name is enabled for you to create Compound Field.
Now map the newly created Compound Field to the Qualified Lookup field of the main table.
Now you have to click on the Automap for value mapping.
Hope this helps.
Please reward if you find this helpful

Similar Messages

Hello Gurus..... ISSUE with child Table update

I have an issue with child table update
I have created a GTC with one parent table and two child tables. I'm able to update the parent table and the values are found in db, but the ISSUE is the child Table values are not updating the db.
please give me a solution
regards
Srikanth

If you are keeping referential integrity in the database, not in the application, it is easy to find the child and parent tables. Here is a quick and dirty query. You can join this to dba_cons_columns to find out on which columns the referential constraints are defined. This lists all child-parent table including SYS and SYSTEM users. You can run this for specific users of course.
select cons1.owner child_owner,cons1.table_name child_table,
cons2.owner parent_owner,cons2.table_name parent_table
from dba_constraints cons1,dba_constraints cons2
where cons1.constraint_type='R'
and cons1.r_constraint_name=cons2.constraint_name;

Issues with Advance Table Add Row New Row not work in some scenarios.

Hi,
Wondering if there's any issue with Advanced Tables where it does not create any rows. I don't know if anyone tried this or not. I have one OA Page with Advanced Table and a button that when clicked open a new OA Page in a POP-UP Window. The pop-up page conatins one textbox where u enter a data and this gets saved in one of the VO's transient attribute. Now on the ase page if you don't click a button to open a pop-up page you can Add New Rows in the Advanced Table by clicking Add Row Button. But as soon as you open a popup window and close it Add New Rows button doesn't work and is not creating any new rows. Basically page stops working. Both the POP-UP and the base page share the same AM but have different controllers.
POP-UP page is a custom page that I open giving the Destination URI value in the button item and target frame _blank.
I even tried creating rows programmatically for Advance Table but this too doesn't work once u open a pop-up. Also I have used pageContext.putTransactionValue in the pop-up page and am checking and removing this in the base page.
Any help is appreciated.
Thanks

anyone

Graphical mapping issue with useOneAsMany if segment does not exist

Hi all
I have an issue with graphical mapping in an IDoc to file scenario. I need to have header level fields mapped to line item fields. Whether or not and how many source header segments of the same type exist depends on a qualifier (QUALF). This is generally working if I use the following graphical mapping:
if QUALF = 001 then <source> -> removeContext -> useOneAsMany -> splitByValue -> <target>
... with setting QUALF, <source>, and the second input for the useOneAsMany to the highest possible context node.
Nevertheless, if the segment with the qualifier 001 does not exist in the source then the mapping throws the error "Too few values in first queue in fuction useOneAsMany". Whatever I've tried, the mapping wants to execute the useOneAsMany statement anyway and I haven't found a way to omit this. Whether the target would be created with an empty value or not created at all would be secondary. Would eventually somebody have a solution to this problem?
Thanks in advance,
Daniel

Daniel,
try using mapWithDefault function before useAsmany
if QUALF = 001 then <source> -> removeContext -> MapwithDefault->useOneAsMany -> splitByValue -> <target>
I think it takes care even if the value occur in the contaxt or.
Babu

Performance issues with pipelined table functions

I am testing pipelined table functions to be able to re-use the base_query function. Contrary to my understanding, the with_pipeline procedure runs 6 time slower than the legacy no_pipeline procedure. Am I missing something? The processor function is from [url http://www.oracle-developer.net/display.php?id=429]improving performance with pipelined table functions .
Edit: The underlying query returns 500,000 rows in about 3 minutes. So there are are no performance issues with the query itself.
Many thanks in advance.
CREATE OR REPLACE PACKAGE pipeline_example
IS
 TYPE resultset_typ IS REF CURSOR;
 TYPE row_typ IS RECORD (colC VARCHAR2(200), colD VARCHAR2(200), colE VARCHAR2(200));
 TYPE table_typ IS TABLE OF row_typ;
 FUNCTION base_query (argA IN VARCHAR2, argB IN VARCHAR2)
 RETURN resultset_typ;
 c_default_limit CONSTANT PLS_INTEGER := 100;
 FUNCTION processor (
 p_source_data IN resultset_typ,
 p_limit_size IN PLS_INTEGER DEFAULT c_default_limit)
 RETURN table_typ
 PIPELINED
 PARALLEL_ENABLE(PARTITION p_source_data BY ANY);
 PROCEDURE with_pipeline (argA IN VARCHAR2,
 argB IN VARCHAR2,
 o_resultset OUT resultset_typ);
 PROCEDURE no_pipeline (argA IN VARCHAR2,
 argB IN VARCHAR2,
 o_resultset OUT resultset_typ);
END pipeline_example;
CREATE OR REPLACE PACKAGE BODY pipeline_example
IS
 FUNCTION base_query (argA IN VARCHAR2, argB IN VARCHAR2)
 RETURN resultset_typ
 IS
 o_resultset resultset_typ;
 BEGIN
 OPEN o_resultset FOR
 SELECT colC, colD, colE
 FROM some_table
 WHERE colA = ArgA AND colB = argB;
 RETURN o_resultset;
 END base_query;
 FUNCTION processor (
 p_source_data IN resultset_typ,
 p_limit_size IN PLS_INTEGER DEFAULT c_default_limit)
 RETURN table_typ
 PIPELINED
 PARALLEL_ENABLE(PARTITION p_source_data BY ANY)
 IS
 aa_source_data table_typ;-- := table_typ ();
 BEGIN
 LOOP
 FETCH p_source_data
 BULK COLLECT INTO aa_source_data
 LIMIT p_limit_size;
 EXIT WHEN aa_source_data.COUNT = 0;
 /* Process the batch of (p_limit_size) records... */
 FOR i IN 1 .. aa_source_data.COUNT
 LOOP
 PIPE ROW (aa_source_data (i));
 END LOOP;
 END LOOP;
 CLOSE p_source_data;
 RETURN;
 END processor;
 PROCEDURE with_pipeline (argA IN VARCHAR2,
 argB IN VARCHAR2,
 o_resultset OUT resultset_typ)
 IS
 BEGIN
 OPEN o_resultset FOR
 SELECT /*+ PARALLEL(t, 5) */ colC,
 SUM (CASE WHEN colD > colE AND colE != '0' THEN colD / ColE END)de,
 SUM (CASE WHEN colE > colD AND colD != '0' THEN colE / ColD END)ed,
 SUM (CASE WHEN colD = colE AND colD != '0' THEN '1' END) de_one,
 SUM (CASE WHEN colD = '0' OR colE = '0' THEN '0' END) de_zero
 FROM TABLE (processor (base_query (argA, argB),100)) t
 GROUP BY colC
 ORDER BY colC
 END with_pipeline;
 PROCEDURE no_pipeline (argA IN VARCHAR2,
 argB IN VARCHAR2,
 o_resultset OUT resultset_typ)
 IS
 BEGIN
 OPEN o_resultset FOR
 SELECT colC,
 SUM (CASE WHEN colD > colE AND colE != '0' THEN colD / ColE END)de,
 SUM (CASE WHEN colE > colD AND colD != '0' THEN colE / ColD END)ed,
 SUM (CASE WHEN colD = colE AND colD != '0' THEN 1 END) de_one,
 SUM (CASE WHEN colD = '0' OR colE = '0' THEN '0' END) de_zero
 FROM (SELECT colC, colD, colE
 FROM some_table
 WHERE colA = ArgA AND colB = argB)
 GROUP BY colC
 ORDER BY colC;
 END no_pipeline;
END pipeline_example;
ALTER PACKAGE pipeline_example COMPILE;Edited by: Earthlink on Nov 14, 2010 9:47 AM
Edited by: Earthlink on Nov 14, 2010 11:31 AM
Edited by: Earthlink on Nov 14, 2010 11:32 AM
Edited by: Earthlink on Nov 20, 2010 12:04 PM
Edited by: Earthlink on Nov 20, 2010 12:54 PM

Earthlink wrote:
Contrary to my understanding, the with_pipeline procedure runs 6 time slower than the legacy no_pipeline procedure. Am I missing something? Well, we're missing a lot here.
Like:
- a database version
- how did you test
- what data do you have, how is it distributed, indexed
and so on.
If you want to find out what's going on then use a TRACE with wait events.
All nessecary steps are explained in these threads:
HOW TO: Post a SQL statement tuning request - template posting
http://oracle-randolf.blogspot.com/2009/02/basic-sql-statement-performance.html
Another nice one is RUNSTATS:
http://asktom.oracle.com/pls/asktom/ASKTOM.download_file?p_file=6551378329289980701

Issue with Multiple Tables in Report

Post Author: dwessell
CA Forum: General
Hi,
I'm using Crystal Reports 2k8.
I'm doing a report with three tables, CQ_HEADER, SO_HEADER and SALESPERSON. Both the CQ_HEADER and the SO_HEADER tables link to the SALESPERSON table via a SPN_AUTO_KEY field.
However, I always receive duplicates in my result set, due to the joins made, and I don't receive results that are valid in one table, and empty in another (Such that it only counts a CQ, if there is a SO associated with it. Here's the query that's produced by CR.
SELECT "CQ_HEADER"."CQ_NUMBER", "CQ_HEADER"."ENTRY_DATE", "CQ_HEADER"."TOTAL_PRICE", "SALESPERSON"."SALESPERSON_NAME", "SO_HEADER"."ENTRY_DATE", "SO_HEADER"."TOTAL_PRICE"
FROM "CQ_HEADER" "CQ_HEADER" INNER JOIN ("SO_HEADER" "SO_HEADER" INNER JOIN "SALESPERSON" "SALESPERSON" ON "SO_HEADER"."SPN_AUTO_KEY"="SALESPERSON"."SPN_AUTO_KEY") ON "CQ_HEADER"."SPN_AUTO_KEY"="SALESPERSON"."SPN_AUTO_KEY"
WHERE ("CQ_HEADER"."ENTRY_DATE">={ts '2007-12-01 00:00:00'} AND "CQ_HEADER"."ENTRY_DATE"<{ts '2007-12-18 00:00:00'}) AND ("SO_HEADER"."ENTRY_DATE">={ts '2007-12-01 00:00:00'} AND "SO_HEADER"."ENTRY_DATE"<{ts '2007-12-18 00:00:00'})
ORDER BY "SALESPERSON"."SALESPERSON_NAME"
There is no link between the SO_HEADER and the CQ_HEADER. Can anyone make a suggestion as to how I could go about structuring this such that it doesn't return duplicate values?
Thanks
David

Hey,
I understand you used Retainsameconnection property true for all the OLEDB connections you used in the package if not make sure its for all the connection including file connection as well.
Additionally, you can try to set Delayvalidation property to true for all the dataflows and control flows in the connection and try running the package for 10MB file.
I hope this will fix the intermittent failure issue you are facing with SSIS.
(Please mark solved if I've answered your question, vote for it as helpful to help other user's find a solution quicker)
Thanks,
Atul Gaikwad.

Issue with Temp tables in SSIS 2012 with RetainSameConnection=true

Hello,
We have few packages written in 2008 and are being upgraded to 2012. Our package mostly uses temp tables during the process. During initial migration, we faced issue with handling temp table in the OLE Db destination provider and found a solution for
the same under
usage of Temp tables in SSIS 2012
Most of our packages execute fine now.
we came across a different issue recently. For one of our package, which merges 3 feeds into a temp table and then executes a stored procedure for processing, the package fails intermittently.
Below are properties of SSIS and its components, which you might be interested
* Retainsameconnection for the OLE Db connection manager set to True
* properties of OLEDB Destination
AccessMode : SQL Command
CommandTimeOut : 0
SQLCommand : Select * from #tmp
* using SSIS 2012 and SQL OLEDB Native Provider 11 (Provider=SQLNCLI11.1)
* one of the feed is 10MB
During investigation using profiler, found that though I use RetainSameConnection, I often could see that more than one SPId is used during the scope of SSIS execution and when ever this happens, package fails with below error message
An OLE DB record is available. Source: "Microsoft SQL Server Native Client 11.0" Hresult: 0x80040E14 Description: "Statement(s) could not be prepared.".
An OLE DB record is available. Source: "Microsoft SQL Server Native Client 11.0" Hresult: 0x80040E14 Description: "Invalid object name '#tmp'."
Now, Why SSIS uses a different SPId during its execution when RetainSameconnection is set to True (note : I have only one OLEDB connection in that package)?
To simulate the issue, Instead of 10MB file, I used a 500KB file and execute the package twice and all went fine.
Is it because of 10 MB file taking long time to process causing the time out of that OLEDB destionation forcing the SSIS to go for another connection? but remember, CommandTimeout is set to infinite(0) for that OLEDB destination.
Much appreciated your response.

Hey,
I understand you used Retainsameconnection property true for all the OLEDB connections you used in the package if not make sure its for all the connection including file connection as well.
Additionally, you can try to set Delayvalidation property to true for all the dataflows and control flows in the connection and try running the package for 10MB file.
I hope this will fix the intermittent failure issue you are facing with SSIS.
(Please mark solved if I've answered your question, vote for it as helpful to help other user's find a solution quicker)
Thanks,
Atul Gaikwad.

Mapping Issue with UDF

I am in the middle of doing a webservice call from within a UDF.
The problem is that when I am declaring my message part of the definition is a url. So I am trying to declare a string like the following:
String m = "<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><msgType xmlns:ns0=http://www.webservice.com ......
Now my problem is with the
xmlns:ns0=http://www.webservice.com
// is a comment in java so everything after this is being seen as a comment how do I solve this issue?
I had the same issue with "
"<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
but I solved it using \ like the following:
"<?xml version=\"1.0\" encoding=\"UTF-8\"?>
The problem is this is working for the //

Hi Alex,
I had a scenario like this in the past.
In most cases you call Services for Lookups.
In such a Case use the
Com.sap.aii.mapping.lookup.api and use the accessor and the lookup services for the same.
In such a case the Communication Channel can store the web addresses and XML,
you just need to
1. Create a Channel object based on the channel
2. Derive a accessor out of it
3. Use the accessor to Bulid your payload
4. parse your payload.
[https://help.sap.com/javadocs/pi/SP3/xpi/index.html]
let me know if this was helpful and do reward points
regards,
Abhishek

Mapping issue with context again

I again need help with a mapping issue. I dont know how to handle the contexts to get this working in the xi graphical mapping tool. I have previously logged a question regarding this structure but the requirements have now changed.
I have a source document that has multiple delivery line items and for each delivery line item, there are multiple handling units. Each handling unit contains the line number of the delivery line item it belongs to. This structure has been simplified below.
Source Sample
<DOCUMENT>
<DELIVERY_LINEITEM>
<LINENUMBER>10</LINENUMBER>
<MATERIAL>mat 1</MATERIAL>
</DELIVERY_LINEITEM >
<DELIVERY_LINEITEM >
<LINENUMBER>20</LINENUMBER>
<MATERIAL>mat 2</MATERIAL>
</DELIVERY_LINEITEM >
<HANDLING_UNITS>
<HU_LABEL>123</HU_LABEL>
<HU_ITEM>
<LINENUMBER>10</LINENUMBER>
</HU_ITEM>
</HANDLING_UNITS>
<HANDLING_UNITS>
<HU_LABEL>456</HU_LABEL>
<HU_ITEM>
<LINENUMBER>10</LINENUMBER>
</HU_ITEM>
</HANDLING_UNITS>
<HANDLING_UNITS>
<HU_LABEL>789</HU_LABEL>
<HU_ITEM>
<LINENUMBER>20</LINENUMBER>
</HU_ITEM>
</HANDLING_UNITS>
</DOCUMENT>
Source Structure
DOCUMENT 1..1
DELIVERY_LINEITEM 1..unbounded
LINENUMBER 1..1
MATERIAL 1..1
HANDLING_UNITS 1..unbounded
HU_LABEL 1..1
HU_ITEM 1..1
LINENUMBER 1..1
In the target structure, I need to output each handling unit along with the corresponding DELIVERY_LINEITEM material. Target structure has been simplified below:
Target Sample
<DOCUMENT>
<ROW>
<PACKAGING>
<HU_LABEL>123</HU_LABEL>
</PACKAGING>
<PACKAGING_ITEM>
<LINENUMBER>10</LINENUMBER>
<MATERIAL>mat 1</MATERIAL>
</PACKAGING_ITEM>
</ROW>
<ROW>
<PACKAGING>
<HU_LABEL>456</HU_LABEL>
</PACKAGING>
<PACKAGING_ITEM>
<LINENUMBER>10</LINENUMBER>
<MATERIAL>mat 1</MATERIAL>
</PACKAGING_ITEM>
</ROW>
<ROW>
<PACKAGING>
<HU_LABEL>789</HU_LABEL>
</PACKAGING>
<PACKAGING_ITEM>
<LINENUMBER>20</LINENUMBER>
<MATERIAL>mat 2</MATERIAL>
</PACKAGING_ITEM>
</ROW>
</DOCUMENT>
Target Structure
DOCUMENT 1..1
ROW 1..unbounded
PACKAGING 1...1
HU_LABEL 1..1
PACKAGING_ITEM 1..1
LINENUMBER 1..1
MATERIAL 1..1
Note, 1 ROW in the target structure = 1 HANDLING_UNITS from the source structure.
Can anyone help me to achieve this? I do not know how to map the relevant DELIVERY_LINEITEM\MATERIAL from the source structure to the target structure.

JM,
Please find the solution. Reply back if it helps or not
http://www.flickr.com/photo_zoom.gne?id=1045178998&size=o
http://www.flickr.com/photo_zoom.gne?id=1045179010&size=o
http://www.flickr.com/photo_zoom.gne?id=1045179022&size=o
Results :http://www.flickr.com/photo_zoom.gne?id=1045179134&size=o
Code used:
for(int j=0;j<Handling_Linenum.length;j++)
for(int k=0;k<Delivery_Linenum.length;k++)
if(Handling_Linenum[j].equals(Delivery_Linenum[k]))
result.addValue(""Material[k]"");
result.addContextChange();
Best regards,
raj.

Rebate related issue with database table VKDFS & VBAK

Hi everybody,
I am facing the problem with the tables VKDFS and VBAK.
In my program the report has to display the details of the agrement numbers concerning to the sale or billing doucmnets later on it has to create a credit memo for that particular customer.
In the coding the program in very beging step, it is fetching all sales documents from VKDFS as per selections like following.
select        * from vkdfs into table ivkdfs
         where fktyp in r_fktyp
         and    vkorg in s_vkorg
         and    fkdat in s_fkdat
         and    kunnr in s_kunnr
         and    fkart in s_fkart
         and    vbeln in s_vbeln
         and    faksk in s_faksk
         and    vtweg in s_vtweg
         and    spart in s_spart
         and    netwr in s_netwr
         and    waerk in s_waerk.
After this whatever the sales orders fetched here, for those all again its fetching from VBAK table as following.
SVBAK[] = IVKDFS[]
select * from vbak into table ivbak
for all entries in svbak
where vbeln = svbak-vbeln
and   knuma in s_knuma
and   auart in s_auart
and   submi in s_submi
and (vbak_wtab).
So, its filtering from VBAK.
But the exact issue is that, there is one sales order which is available in VBAK but does not available in VKDFS table.
So, my program fails to display the report regarding to that agreement number.
As per my analysis I came to know that there are no entries in VKDFS table against to the sales orders in VBAK concerning agreement numbers.
VKDFS-SD index: billing initiator table.
I want to know how come this VKDFS table is updating against to VBAK table. If possible how to make this entry in that table against to the values in VBAK. But it should not effect other tables.
Please let me know the solution if you people have any .
Its an urgent and sev 1 tickets
eagerly waiting for solution or some information.
Thanks&Regards.
J.

Hi everybody,
I am facing the problem with the tables VKDFS and VBAK.
In my program the report has to display the details of the agrement numbers concerning to the sale or billing doucmnets later on it has to create a credit memo for that particular customer.
In the coding the program in very beging step, it is fetching all sales documents from VKDFS as per selections like following.
select        * from vkdfs into table ivkdfs
         where fktyp in r_fktyp
         and    vkorg in s_vkorg
         and    fkdat in s_fkdat
         and    kunnr in s_kunnr
         and    fkart in s_fkart
         and    vbeln in s_vbeln
         and    faksk in s_faksk
         and    vtweg in s_vtweg
         and    spart in s_spart
         and    netwr in s_netwr
         and    waerk in s_waerk.
After this whatever the sales orders fetched here, for those all again its fetching from VBAK table as following.
SVBAK[] = IVKDFS[]
select * from vbak into table ivbak
for all entries in svbak
where vbeln = svbak-vbeln
and   knuma in s_knuma
and   auart in s_auart
and   submi in s_submi
and (vbak_wtab).
So, its filtering from VBAK.
But the exact issue is that, there is one sales order which is available in VBAK but does not available in VKDFS table.
So, my program fails to display the report regarding to that agreement number.
As per my analysis I came to know that there are no entries in VKDFS table against to the sales orders in VBAK concerning agreement numbers.
VKDFS-SD index: billing initiator table.
I want to know how come this VKDFS table is updating against to VBAK table. If possible how to make this entry in that table against to the values in VBAK. But it should not effect other tables.
Please let me know the solution if you people have any .
Its an urgent and sev 1 tickets
eagerly waiting for solution or some information.
Thanks&Regards.
J.

Issue creating qualified tables in MDM 5.5 SP04 Console

Try the following:
1) Make sure you are using SP04 Patch 1 (Build 5.5.33.13)
2) Unarchieve one of the supplied business content repositories (Eg. Customer, Material, etc).
3) Create a flat lookup table
4) Create a qualified table with only one field: Field type lookup flat referencing the flat lookup table created in step 3, non-qualifier, display field.
5) Create a new field in main table, type qualified multi-value, referencing the qualified table created in step 4.
6) Load the repository
7) Login to repository with data manager
8) Create 1 entry in lookup table created in step 3
9) Create 1 entry in main table, also creating 1 sub-entry in qualified table, save the record with SHIFT-ENTER
10) Make sure the record was saved, including qualified table entry
11) Close data manager
12) Open data manager again
13) Select your record and try to go in to the qualified sub-entry
In my case this produces data manager to crash.
This does not happen for qualified tables created in SP03 and updated to SP04, only for tables created directly in the SP04 console.
Please let me know if everybody is having the same problem.

Hi, Jorge,
I have MDM5.5 SP4 P1 HF1 and followed your steps (except in step 4 (THANK YOU for numbering them), I have more than one field.) At step 13, I selected my record and to my amazement the record was there but my qualified table data was gone. And I then performed your step 14, and opened the qualified lookup table, and again to my amazement the console crashed.
This definitely appears to be a bug and you should report it. I will also see if I can ask around for other solutions.
Kristin

SQL Query : Order By issue with HUGE Table

Hello friends,
I have been through a terrible issue with order by. I would appreciate your help. Please let me know, your input for my case:
=> if i run select query it returns result quick in some milliseconds. (sql dev. fetches 50 rows at a time)
=> if i run select query with where condition and column (say A) in where condition is even indexed and i have order by and that order by column (say B) is also indexed.
Now, here is the issue:
1. if no. of rows with that where condition can filter yielding small result set then order by works fine .. 1-5 sec which is good.
2.*if no. of rows with that where condition can filter yielding Large result set, say more than 50,000 then with order by then the wait time is exponential.... i have even waited 10+ mins to get the result back for 120,000 records.*
Is order by takes that long for 100K records ... i think something else if wrong... your pointer will really be helpful... i am very new to sql and even newer for large table case.
I am using SQL Developer Version 2.1.1.64
and Oracle Database 11g Enterprise Edition Release 11.1.0.7.0 - 64bit Production
Thank you so much.
Edited by: 896719 on Jan 11, 2013 8:38 AM

Yes you are correct, but my concentration was on order by thing, so it will do full scan of table so i was putting that ... and was also wondering if millions of record in table should not be a issue...???
Any way for the explain plan , when just a value in the where changes there is the huge difference i want to point out too as below:
SELECT
FROM
    EES_EVT EES_EVT where APLC_EVT_CD= 'ABC' ORDER BY CRE_DTTM DESC
execution time : 0.047 sec
Plan hash value: 290548126
| Id | Operation                    | Name        | Rows | Bytes | Cost (%CPU)| Time     |
|   0 | SELECT STATEMENT             |             |    27 | 14688 |    25   (4)| 00:00:01 |
|   1 | SORT ORDER BY               |             |    27 | 14688 |    25   (4)| 00:00:01 |
|   2 |   TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID| EES_EVT     |    27 | 14688 |    24   (0)| 00:00:01 |
|* 3 |    INDEX RANGE SCAN          | XIE1EES_EVT |    27 |       |     4   (0)| 00:00:01 |
Predicate Information (identified by operation id):
   3 - access("APLC_EVT_CD"='ABC')
Note
   - SQL plan baseline "SYS_SQL_PLAN_6d41e6b91925c463" used for this statement
=============================================================================================
SELECT
FROM
    EES_EVT EES_EVT where APLC_EVT_CD= 'XYZ' ORDER BY CRE_DTTM DESC
execution : 898.672 sec.
Plan hash value: 290548126
| Id | Operation                    | Name        | Rows | Bytes |TempSpc| Cost (%CPU)| Time     |
|   0 | SELECT STATEMENT             |             |   121K|    62M|       |   102K (1)| 00:11:02 |
|   1 | SORT ORDER BY               |             |   121K|    62M|    72M|   102K (1)| 00:11:02 |
|   2 |   TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID| EES_EVT     |   121K|    62M|       | 88028   (1)| 00:09:27 |
|* 3 |    INDEX RANGE SCAN          | XIE1EES_EVT |   121K|       |       |   689   (1)| 00:00:05 |
Predicate Information (identified by operation id):
   3 - access("APLC_EVT_CD"='XYZ')
Note
   - SQL plan baseline "SYS_SQL_PLAN_ef5709641925c463" used for this statementAlso Note this table contains 74328 MB data in it.
Thanks

Strange issue with ADF table in chrome browser

I have ADF table which should display 23 rows, but only 20 rows are visible in chrome browser, but other browsers like IE, firefox displays the 23 rows correctly. I have used default ADF table with Drag&drop behaviour in this table. All the 23 rows exported correctly to Excel with export to Excel behaviour and inspect page source also shows all the rows in Chrome browser, but display in the adf is only problem in chrome browser. We're having a production issue with this, any ideas are appreciated.
Thanks,
Surya

Hi All,
Is this issue fixed yet? There are a couple of threads reporting this issue and the original thread has been Archived. It is a real issue, and it remains an issue. The Chrome browser cuts off the last row of a table in the display. IE displays the row correctly. I am working with JDev 12.1.2 and I am building an application using ADF Tables. Without exception, on every page that has one, the last row of the table is cut off from display in a very ugly way and you cannot scroll down to display the full row. I have tried wrapping the table in a Panel Collection - same result, I have tried setting the height of the table - same result. I have tried surrounding the table with a PanelGroupLayout component (layout set to scroll) - same result. I have even tried surrounding the table with a PanelHeaderComponent component, Type set to both default and Stretch - yes, you guessed it, same result! I've even put the table in the middle of a PanelStretchLayout component - but the last row is always cut off.
This should be easy for you to reproduce, just drop a data control on a ADF page and select a table. When you view it in the Chrome browser and you will see what I'm talking about. I'm using Google Chrome version 31.0.1650.63 m.
I have experimented with AFStretchWidth and AutoHeightRows (as suggested by previous threads), nothing seems to work.
Here's another suggestion, if the forum would allow you to insert an image, I could actually show you what I'm talking about. Food for thought perhaps?
Best regards,
Nigel
"Life's too short not to use ADF"

Insert performance issue with Partitioned Table.....

Hi All,
I have a performance issue during with a table which is partitioned. without table being partitioned
it ran in less time but after partition it took more than double.
1) The table was created initially without any partition and the below insert took only 27 minuts.
Total Rec Inserted :- 2424233
PL/SQL procedure successfully completed.
Elapsed: 00:27:35.20
2) Now I re-created the table with partition(range yearly - below) and the same insert took 59 minuts.
Is there anyway i can achive the better performance during insert on this partitioned table?
[ similerly, I have another table with 50 Million records and the insert took 10 hrs without partition.
with partitioning the table, it took 18 hours... ]
SQL> select * from table(dbms_xplan.display);
PLAN_TABLE_OUTPUT
Plan hash value: 4195045590
| Id | Operation | Name | Rows | Bytes |TempSpc| Cost (%CPU)| Time |
| 0 | SELECT STATEMENT | | 643K| 34M| | 12917 (3)| 00:02:36 |
|* 1 | HASH JOIN | | 643K| 34M| 2112K| 12917 (3)| 00:02:36 |
| 2 | VIEW | index$_join$_001 | 69534 | 1290K| | 529 (3)| 00:00:07 |
|* 3 | HASH JOIN | | | | | | |
| 4 | INDEX FAST FULL SCAN| PK_ACCOUNT_MASTER_BASE | 69534 | 1290K| | 181 (3)| 00:00
| 5 | INDEX FAST FULL SCAN| ACCOUNT_MASTER_BASE_IDX2 | 69534 | 1290K| | 474 (2)| 00:00
PLAN_TABLE_OUTPUT
| 6 | TABLE ACCESS FULL | TB_SISADMIN_BALANCE | 2424K| 87M| | 6413 (4)| 00:01:17 |
Predicate Information (identified by operation id):
1 - access("A"."VENDOR_ACCT_NBR"=SUBSTR("B"."ACCOUNT_NO",1,8) AND
"A"."VENDOR_CD"="B"."COMPANY_NO")
3 - access(ROWID=ROWID)
Open C1;
Loop
Fetch C1 Bulk Collect Into C_Rectype Limit 10000;
Forall I In 1..C_Rectype.Count
Insert test
     col1,col2,col3)
Values
     val1, val2,val3);
V_Rec := V_Rec + Nvl(C_Rectype.Count,0);
Commit;
Exit When C_Rectype.Count = 0;
C_Rectype.delete;
End Loop;
End;
Total Rec Inserted :- 2424233
PL/SQL procedure successfully completed.
Elapsed: 00:51:01.22
Edited by: user520824 on Jul 16, 2010 9:16 AM

I'm concerned about the view in step 2 and the index join in step 3. A composite index with both columns might eliminate the index join and result in fewer read operations.
If you know which partition the data is going into beforehand you can save a little bit of processing by specifying the partition (which may not be a scalable long-term solution) in the insert - I'm not 100% sure you can do this on inserts but I know you can on selects.
The APPEND hint won't help the way you are using it - the VALUES clause in an insert makes it be ignored. Where it is effective and should help you is if you can do the insert in one query - insert into/select from. If you are using the loop to avoid filling up undo/rollback you can use a bulk collect to batch the selects and commit accordingly - but don't commit more often than you have to because more frequent commits slow transactions down.
I don't think there is a nologging hint :)
So, try something like
insert /*+ hints */ into ...
Select
     A.Ing_Acct_Nbr, currency_Symbol,
     Balance_Date,     Company_No,
     Substr(Account_No,1,8) Account_No,
     Substr(Account_No,9,1) Typ_Cd ,
     Substr(Account_No,10,1) Chk_Cd,
     Td_Balance,     Sd_Balance,
     Sysdate,     'Sisadmin'
From Ideaal_Cons.Tb_Account_Master_Base A,
     Ideaal_Staging.Tb_Sisadmin_Balance B
Where A.Vendor_Acct_Nbr = Substr(B.Account_No,1,8)
   And A.Vendor_Cd = b.company_no
      ;Edited by: riedelme on Jul 16, 2010 7:42 AM

Performance issue with COEP table in ECC 6

Hi,,
Any idea how to resonlve performance issue on COEP table in ECC6.0
We are not using COEP table right now. this table occupies 100gb of 900 gb in PRD system.
Can i directly archive/delete the table?
Regards
Siva

Hi Siva,
You cannot archive COEP table alone. It should be archived along with the respective archive object. Just deleting the table is not at all a good idea.
For finding out the appropriate archive object contributing to the entries in COEP, you need to perform CO table analysis using programs RARCCOA1 and RARCCOA2. For further informaton refer to SAP note 138688.
Hope this helps,
Naveen

Mapping issue with Qualifier table

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for