Mass Maintain for F-04 Post For Clearing

Hi SAP Expert,
Is there any mass maintain for transaction F-04 Post For Clearing
i have about 1500 data ( debit and credit ). if i do manually entering i need to enter about 1500 times  then save the document, i have using LSMW to pum the 1500 line item data but the LSMW got error,
When i recording i'm using two data and save, in the live it grap two data and save, actually i'm need to enter about 1500 in one document number,
please assist

HI
If your requirement is for clearing the open items in a GL account please use F.13 which will do automatic clearing.You need not select each and every line item via F-04.
Good luck
Hari

Similar Messages

  • BAPI for F.04 (Posting with Clearing)

    Hi Experts,
    I got 2  Function Modules for F.04. T.code,
    1. BAPI_ACC_DOCUMENT_POST.
    2. BAPI_ACC_GL_POSTING_POST.
    please tell me which one is more suitable and if possible  then please provide code
    Thanks & Regards,
    Vimarsh B.

    Hi,
    Please find the code below:
    LOOP AT it_upload_rec.
        header-bus_act = 'RFBU'.
        header-doc_date = it_upload_rec-bldat.
        header-pstng_date = it_upload_rec-budat.               header-header_txt = 'F-02 Posting'.
        header-comp_code = 'PL10'.
        header-doc_type = 'SA'.
        header-username = sy-uname.
        APPEND header.
        CLEAR header.
        account_gl-itemno_acc = '1'.
        account_gl-gl_account = it_upload_rec-account1.
        APPEND account_gl.
        CLEAR account_gl.
        account_payable-itemno_acc = '2'.
        account_payable-vendor_no = it_upload_rec-account2.
        APPEND account_payable.
        CLEAR account_payable.
        currency_amount-itemno_acc = '1'.
        currency_amount-currency = 'INR'.
        currency_amount-amt_doccur = it_upload_rec-amount.
        APPEND currency_amount.
        CLEAR currency_amount.
      ENDLOOP.
      CALL FUNCTION 'BAPI_ACC_DOCUMENT_POST'
        EXPORTING
          documentheader          = header
    *   CUSTOMERCPD             =
    *   CONTRACTHEADER          =
       IMPORTING
      obj_type = gv_obj_type
      obj_key = gv_obj_key
      obj_sys = gv_obj_sys
        TABLES
         accountgl               = account_gl
       ACCOUNTRECEIVABLE       =
         accountpayable          = account_payable
    *   ACCOUNTTAX              =
          currencyamount          = currency_amount
    *   CRITERIA                =
    *   VALUEFIELD              =
    *   EXTENSION1              =
        return                  = it_return
    *   PAYMENTCARD             =
    *   CONTRACTITEM            =
    *   EXTENSION2              =
    *   REALESTATE              =
    CALL FUNCTION 'BAPI_TRANSACTION_COMMIT'.
    KR Jaideep,

  • BAPI function modules for F-30(Post with clearing)

    Hello,
    Is there any BAPI FM that can be used for F-30?
    I am trying to program a BDC for this transaction. 
    But it turns out very difficult since there are a few radio buttons and also it's hard to determine the line number of an open invoice.
    Thanks,
    Karen

    Hi,
    try to use rfbibl00 with structures bselk and bselp and TA FB05
    look here: Re: BAPI for F-30
    Andreas

  • Generic service() for request, specify POST for response?

    I'm designing a servlet that can communicate with Macromedia's FLASH. This program does things a little strangely. It has a myXML.sendAndLoad() method which sends an xml object to a server, and expects one back (the objects are serialised as a single unwrapped text line). It claims to send using POST, but actually, when you look at the headers, is sends using GET, and then appends the data in a seperate transmission (in the body of the request) as POST would.
    to get around this annoyence, I'm reading in the data like this
    public void service(HttpServletRequest req, HttpServletResponse resp)
         throws ServletException, IOException
              //Read the xml from the HTTP request into a String
              BufferedReader reader = req.getReader();
              String xmlString = reader.readLine();this works fine.
    Just one thing - FLASH will expect the response to be POST. At the moment FLASH receives a response, but can't decipher it as (I assume) the service() method sends a response back in the same format that it received the request.
    Q - how do I keep the service() bit for receiving th request, but specify a doPost() for the response?
    thanks for any help
    RT

    That's what I'm doing. However, I should think (though I'm not sure) that when the service method is called, it fires a doGet (as the req Header is GET). Therefore (?) the response would also be a GET . OK, the output will be written to the body with this method, but I think FLASH needs a POST. Am not sure on the last one - but no one else seems to be either!

  • Y will mi car for sale not post for craigslist ive ben trying for hours i sign in give info load picktuers add push to post it just cant conect can u make this happen

    thats it above i dont know what u want i need to do this but ive ben trying 15hours strait please make it happen before i lie in the flore and kick my feet

    thats it above i dont know what u want i need to do this but ive ben trying 15hours strait please make it happen before i lie in the flore and kick my feet

  • Creating a "Post with clearing" document in workflow.

    Hi All.
    Do you know if there exists a standard task or business object that would allow for creating a "post with clearing" document in workflow as a result of a user decision?
    Best
    Greg

    Hi,
    You need to check the original program generating the batch job.
    If it is a custom program, then you can include a check on currency, so that no batch data gets created for incorrect currency.
    Regards,
    Gaurav

  • FB05 (post and clearing) u0093The difference is too large for clearingu0094

    I am passing entry through FB05 (Post and clear). The entry is between two GL accounts maintained as open items. At the time of passing the entry there is difference between these two accounts. I want this difference to be posted automatically to profit and loss account. (I don’t want to charge of the difference manually). I can not post the entry because system is throwing error such as “The difference is too large for clearing”. I checked the tolerance limit(OBA4), but the difference is within the tolerance limit.
    Does anybody know how to configure for this situation?
    Do I need to do any configuration in FBKP?
    (Please consider this very urgent)
    Regards,
    Amit Bedekar.

    Hello
    Check if this helps.
    Reason Codes
    Use
    To use the clearing document to find out why a difference existed, you can assign reason codes to the line items. Reason codes are indicated by keys that you define in Customizing.
    You can assign reason codes for the following:
    Partial payments made for open items.
    Residual items created for an open item. Here you can assign one or more reason codes. In this case, you divide the difference amount into a corresponding number of partial amounts.
    Differences posted on account without reference to an open item.
    For each line item you enter in the clearing procedure, if the reason code field for the account is ready for input.
    Integration
    When you process residual items, the reason code also controls how the remaining amount is posted. The remaining amount can be posted as follows:
    To a G/L account that is assigned to the reason code you enter.
    As a new customer or vendor open item if you do not enter a reason code, or if the reason code you enter is not indicated as described.
    Features
    Properties of Reason Codes
    For incoming payments, you can send a payment notification to the customer. This process can run automatically if differences arise during clearing. In the tolerance group set up for the customer, you can define what type of notice to create for partial payments, residual items, and payments on account.
    The system can use the specified reason code to determine the type of notice to create as long as only one reason code is specified in the entire clearing transaction.
    In order to check a customer's credit limit, the total of open items is taken into account. If certain contentious items should not be considered, you can define a separate reason code for these items.
    Reason codes control:
    How the difference is posted (as a new open item or to a predefined G/L account)
    What type of payment notice is created
    Whether an item is included in credit limit checks
    For information on defining reason codes, see the following activities in the Financial Accounting  Implementation Guide:
    Define Reason Codes (Incoming Payments)
    Define Reason Codes (Manual Outgoing Payments)
    Define Standard Reason Codes for Clearing with Payment Advice Notes
    Reg
    *assign points if useful

  • Maintain acct determination (table T030B) for posting key IRX / IGX (M8395)

    Dear Guru,
    I am testing IS-Oil & Gas (Downstream) - Exchanges.
    Created Exchange Agreement and Purchase Contract and Sales Contract, Purchase Contract and Sales Contract are assigned to the Exchange Contract.
    A PO is created with reference to the Purchase Contract.
    Upon post goods receipt in MIGO, encountered error message "Maintain account determination (table T030B) for posting key IRX (Message no. M8395)" that does not allow PGR to get through.
    A call-off is created with reference to the Sales Contract.
    Similarly, when PGI is performed in VL01N, encountered error message "Maintain account determination (table T030B) for posting key IGX (Message no. M8395)" that does not allow PGI to get through.
    Checked in OBYC, there is no transaction key for IRX and IGX.
    Please advise. Thank you.
    Regards,
    WL

    Hi WL,
    Please use transaction code O54E to maintain the required configuration.
    I hope this helps you.
    Thanks & Regards
    Kalpesh Chavda

  • Maintain account determination (table T030B) for posting key IRX (M8395)

    Dear Guru,
    I am testing IS-OIL - Exchanges.
    Created Exchange Agreement and Purchase Contract and Sales Contract, Purchase Contract and Sales Contract are assigned to the Exchange Contract.
    A PO is created with reference to the Purchase Contract.
    Upon post goods receipt in MIGO, encountered error message "Maintain account determination (table T030B) for posting key IRX (Message no. M8395)" that does not allow PGR to get through.
    A call-off is created with reference to the Sales Contract.
    Similarly, when PGI is performed in VL01N, encountered error message "Maintain account determination (table T030B) for posting key IGX (Message no. M8395)" that does not allow PGI to get through.
    Checked in OBYC, there is no transaction key for IRX and IGX.
    Please advise. Thank you.
    Regards,
    WL

    Hi WL,
    In an Exchange scenario, the account determination entry would have to go added through tcode O54E for this purpose. You would see both the IRX and IGX entry in the above mentioned tcode.
    Menu path: IS-OIL Downstream --> EXG --> Account Assignment
    You would not be able to see the IRX or IGX transaction key in OBYC.
    Hope the above helps.
    Thanks.
    Edited by: Kok Wai Phang on Jul 10, 2011 7:58 AM

  • Post with Clearing: BAPI for clearing open items

    Hi,
    I'm looking for a way to use the logic of transaction F-30 (Post with Clearing) in an external application. I want to clear open items. Is there a BAPI or something else for it? While debugging transaction F-30 I found the function module POST_DOCUMENT together with function module FI_DOCUMENT_PROCESS which are used to actually clear the selected open items. But there is lot more coding around these function modules that might be needed/important. So, is there a BAPI that puts all together? Or what's the best way to do it at all?
    Regards,
    Robert

    Hi,
    BAPI_CR_ACC_GETOLDESTOPENITEM BAPI/BUS1010: Determine Oldest Open Item .... BAPI_AR_ACC_GETBALANCEDITEMS Customer account clearing transactions
    thanks
    abdul

  • Maintain number range interval 01 for posting change notices

    Hi,
    I am doing transfer posting using movement type 321 (quality to unrestricted) for one material.While posting i am getting error"Maintain number range interval 01 for posting change notices" Message no. L0015
    WM is active for this material and doing this movement for one plant which is newly created in system.Wil you please advice for which document type i had to maintain number range.Please inform SPRO path / Transaction to be used to make required changes.
    Thanks & Regards
    Atharva

    Maintain number range for posting change in tcode  OMLW

  • Bapi for Transfer posting with clearing

    Hello,
    please let me know the bapi for Transfer posting with clearing for transcation F-04 or FB05.
    quick reply wil be helpfull.
    Thanks,
    ram

    Hi
    I don't know in release greater than 4.7, but there isn't that BAPI.
    There's a BAPI to post a document, but the clearing is an internal transaction so I don't believe there's a BAPI for it.
    Anyway you can try to create one using the std BDC RFBIBL00: it suppoerts that transaction.
    Max

  • BAPI for Posting with clearing

    Hi all,
    Is there any BAPI which can do posting with clearing?Generally we can acheive this through a transaction F-04.BAPI required which can acheive the functionality of F-04.Any Inputs will be highly appreciated with points.
    Thanks and Regards
    Kiran

    hi,
    check this function module.
    POSTING_INTERFACE_CLEARING.

  • How to Maintain Payment with one check for Multiple Vendors?

    Dear Gurus,
    i have a scenario for outgoing payment, here it is
    i have some open items for multiple vendors. say it for open item
    1. with amount 5000 USD for vendor A
    2. wiht amount 10000 USD for vendor B
    my company pay both open item 1 & 2 with one check, say the check no is 27382830 and the amount is 15000 USD. The check is given to the Bank as an order to Pay the vendor. so the check does not have receiver name. i attach a formal letter to the bank to ask them for making payment with that check. the letter contains a detail the amount, vendor bank account number, account holder, and the vendor name.
    so how i can threat this business scenario into SAP? i want to trace check number used to pay the vendors.
    hope you can give some clues. is it possible to maintain scenario above with automatic payment?
    best regards,
    land lord

    Hi,
    Yes you can map this scenario in SAP and use F110 for this. But you will also have to use some Z programs..
    1. For F110 FBZP configuration, maintain outgoing bank clearing Account (this will be a dummy account and not the actual Outgoing Bank Account) as the Bank Sub Account.
    By doing this when you run payment in F110, entry will be
    Vendor A A/c...Dr.
    outgoing bank clearing Account Cr.(1)
    Vendor B A/C... Dr.
    outgoing bank clearing Account Cr.(2)
    2.Then you will have to use Post with clearing transaction codes and make one entry
    outgoing bank clearing Account Cr.(1)..Dr.
    outgoing bank clearing Account Cr.(2)..Dr.
    To Bank Outgoing Account(Actual Bank outgoing Account) Cr.
    3. Now, when you get the single cheque no. from Bank against both the vendors, then thru FB02, change the assignment field/Reference field for Che No. updates.
    But do check BRS also for its reconciliation.. If you do it on a daily basis.. then it would not be difficult.
    Hope this helps you..
    Regards,
    SAPFICO

  • Help in CENVAT Posting for Import Asset Purchases

    Dear All,
    I have a Import Asset Purchase order that has excise posting.
    Excise duty rates are:
    HCESS 200
    BASIC 200
    CESS 200
    SED 200
    In Part 2 of Excising postings, I have the following entries:
    HCESS 100
    BASIC 100
    CESS 100
    SED 100
    Current system will have the following accounting postings:
    CENVAT Hold 400
    HCESS 100
    BASIC 100
    CESS 100
    CENVAT Clearing 400
    I would like to know why the SED Posting was combined in the CENVAT HOLD.
    Upon investigastion, the ETT for the PO is GRPO and subtransaction type of XX.
    In configuration for specify GL Account for Excise transaction, the Account is also different to the one actually posted in accounting.
    Customer also wants that for SED the Part 2 Posting should be 100 percent, so in the case above the Part 2 Posting should be 200 instead of 100.
    So I have a bunch of errors, the accounting document posting is not posting in the correct GL account as configured. The SED Posting is being bundled with the CENVAT Hold and customer wants 100% Part 2 Posting of the SED Excise rate.
    Appreciate if you could help.
    Thank you!

    hi
    please check that u have main tained the gl accounts for subtransaction IP for ETT CAPE
    check ur entry here
    spro>Logistics - General>Tax on Goods Movements>India>Account Determination>Specify Excise Accounts per Excise Transaction check combination of CAPE and IP is maintained here
    CAPE IP Credit CENVAT clearing account
    CAPE IP Debit CENVAT on hold account
    CAPE IP Debit RG 23 AED account
    CAPE IP Debit RG 23 AT1 Account
    CAPE IP Debit RG 23 BED account
    CAPE IP Debit RG 23 ECS Account
    and then for Specify G/L Accounts per Excise Transaction u have to maintain the GLs
    also check that u have maintained the material type as A asset for the material in J1id
    regards
    kunal

Maybe you are looking for