MBA - difference between early 2014 and mid 2014?

Today my new MBA 13", 1.7, 8 GB, 256 GB has arrived. When I checked the serial number I found out, that it is from early 2014. Is there a difference between early 2014 and mid 2014?
Should I send it back to the reseller?

Thank you for the quick reply. I wonder about that because in German online shops and communities there is often written about mid 2014.
One the Apple homepage I found out the early 2014 works with Mavericks. The current MBA in the apple store works with yosemite. But I could not find and hardware differences...

Similar Messages

  • What's the difference between InDesign CC and InDesign CC 2014?

    Hi,
    I am in the middle of projects and I see there is a whole new release of the Adobe Cloud apps.
    What is the What's the difference between InDesign CC and InDesign CC 2014?
    Are there different features?
    Different tutorials?
    I don't want to suddenly open my files in INDD CC 2014 unless it is fairly seamless.
    Thanks for any help and advice.
    — CR

    http://blogs.adobe.com/jkost/2014/06/installing-the-2014-release-of-creative-cloud.html
    -you may need to log OUT of your Cloud account and then log IN again to see the updates
    This messages says (at least some) CC 2014 programs use NEW plugins https://forums.adobe.com/thread/1499663
    -so do not uninstall the older CC programs if you use plugins in your programs until you are sure you have plugins that work in CC2014
    If you are sure you don't need the old CC programs
    -http://helpx.adobe.com/creative-cloud/help/install-apps.html to install or uninstall
    -read reply #3 about the ORDER of uninstalling & installing
    For program specifics, try InDesign
    The Cloud forum is not about using individual programs
    The Cloud forum is about the Cloud as a delivery & install process
    If you will start at the Forums Index https://forums.adobe.com/welcome
    You will be able to select a forum for the specific Adobe product(s) you use
    Click the "down arrow" symbol on the right (where it says All communities) to open the drop down list and scroll

  • Difference between photoshop cc and photoshop cc 2014   how do i know which one I am using?

    difference between photoshop cc and photoshop cc 2014   how do i know which one I am using?

    Hi Petereas,
    Both are different version of Photoshop application.
    In Photoshop CC 2014 there are several new feature introduced than CC.
    Please refer the following page on whats new in Photoshop 2014.
    Photoshop Help | New features summary
    When you go to Help>About Photoshop then Photoshop 2014 shows version 2014.0.0 Release.
    Hope this helps.
    Thanks and Regards,
    Sumit Singh

  • Difference between PS CC and PS CC 2014...?

    So what's the difference between PS CC and PS CC 2014...?
    And why is Adobe making two different products for what seems to be the exact same application audience?
    I am a Creative Cloud subscriber by the way, so I do have access to both. I had gotten used to Photoshop CC, then all of a sudden comes along Photoshop CC 2014 – yet at the same time Adobe is still updating my Photoshop CC as a part of the process.
    Sorry, but I'm confused…

    Hi JJMack,
    Thanks for your reply.
    I understand the specific feature differences between Photoshop CC and Photoshop CC 2014; but what has me confused is why Adobe decided to release two separate products, especially for people who are Creative Cloud subscribers?
    In other words, why not just incorporate everything now found with PS CC 2014 into PS CC?
    I continue to be confused by Adobe's rationale for going with two separate Photoshop apps updated/released at exactly the same time. I've been a long-time user of Photoshop (many years) and I'm just not getting the underlying rationale.
    Thanks again!

  • Show difference between the years and how much money increased ever year

    Hi everyone
    I need to make the following code show how many years it took for it to reach its required goal.
    show difference between the years and how much money increased ever year. ..
    I am totally confused at the moment... any help would be greatly appreciated...
    declare
    a number(9):=1000;
    b number(9);
    c number(9);
    d number(9);
    begin
    for d in 2012..2099
    loop
    dbms_output.put_line(a||' '||d);
    if a >2000 then
    exit;
    end if;
    a :=a + a*10/100;
    end loop;
    end;
    Result for above query:
    Price Years
    1000 2012
    1100 2013
    1200 2014 etc...
    I need to show the amount of years it took to reach its goal, which was $2000
    and also the change in price, how much it increased every year...
    Thanks
    Umair

    960361 wrote:
    Hi everyone
    I need to make the following code show how many years it took for it to reach its required goal.
    show difference between the years and how much money increased ever year. ..
    I am totally confused at the moment... any help would be greatly appreciated...
    declare
    a number(9):=1000;
    b number(9);
    c number(9);
    d number(9);
    begin
    for d in 2012..2099
    loop
    dbms_output.put_line(a||' '||d);
    if a >2000 then
    exit;
    end if;
    a :=a + a*10/100;
    end loop;
    end;
    Result for above query:
    Price Years
    1000 2012
    1100 2013
    1200 2014 etc...
    I need to show the amount of years it took to reach its goal, which was $2000
    and also the change in price, how much it increased every year...
    Thanks
    UmairHow do I ask a question on the forums?
    SQL and PL/SQL FAQ

  • What is the difference between relational database and NoSql DB

    HI,
    i never work with any nosql db. so i like to know What is the difference between relational database and NoSql DB ?
    in relational db sql server we can create relation between table by PK and FK. so is it possible in NoSql db like Mongo db ?
    sql server db use to in big data for any organization. does Mongo db like nosql db use for same purpose ?
    i like to know in what kind of situation people use Mongo db or any NoSql db. please tell me few sample scenario where people like to use Mongo db or any NoSql. thanks

    Here are some good links that describe the differences:
    http://www.mongodb.com/nosql-explained
    https://blog.udemy.com/nosql-vs-sql-2/
    http://www.thegeekstuff.com/2014/01/sql-vs-nosql-db/
    Mark as answer or vote as helpful if you find it useful | Igor

  • The difference between system restore and last good known configuration

    hi,
    what is the difference between system restore  and last good known configuration.
    in which situation you use system restore ,and in which situation you use last good known configuration.
    very short answer wil be enough.
    thanks
    johan
    h.david

    Last Known Good Configuration deals only with Starting Windows eg. a bad registry or incorrect driver is preventing Windows to start.It recovers the registry settings of HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\System\CurrentControlSet
    While System Restore uses restore points to return your system files and settings to an earlier point in time without affecting personal files. Restore points are created automatically every week, and just before significant system events, such as the installation
    of a program or device driver. You can also create a restore point manually.You can undone system restore but there is no such option in Last Known Good Configuration.
    Last Known Good Configuration is disabled in Windows 8 or,Windows 8.1 by default.
    Try using Last Known Good Configuration if you can't start Windows, but it started correctly the last time you turned on the computer.
    Try using System Restore to return the system to an earlier point in time when things worked correctly.
    S.Sengupta, Windows Entertainment and Connected Home MVP

  • What is the difference between Topic Keywords and Index File Keywords?

    What is the difference between Topic Keywords and Index File Keywords? Any advantages to using one over the other? Do they appear differently in the generated index?
    RH9.0.2.271
    I'm using Webhelp

    Hi there
    When you create a RoboHelp project you end up with many different ancillary files that are used to store different bits of information. Many of these files bear the name you assigned to the project at the time you created it. The index file has the project name and it ends with a .HHK file extension. (HHK meaning HTML Help Keywords)
    Generally, unless you change RoboHelp's settings, you add keywords to this file and associate topics to the keywords via the Index pod. At the time you compile a CHM or generate other types of output, the file is consulted and the index is built.
    As I said earlier, the default is to add keywords to the Index file until you configure RoboHelp to add the keywords to the topics themselves. Once you change this, any keyword added will become a META tag in the topic code. If your keyword is BOFFO, the META tag would look like this:
    <meta name="MS-HKWD" content="BOFFO" />
    When the help is compiled or generated, the Index (.HHK) file is consulted as normal, but any topics containing keywords added in this manner are also added to the Index you end up with. From the appearance perspective, the end user woudn't know the difference or be able to tell. Heck, if all you ever did was interact with the Index pod, you, as an author wouldn't know either. Well, other than the fact that the icons appear differently.
    Operationally, keywords added to the topics themselves may hold an advantage in that if you were to import these topics into other projects, the Index keywords would already be present.
    Hopefully this helps... Rick

  • Difference between open loop and closed loop mode when finding the index on a stepper motor axis.

    I have a test system which uses a PXI-7352 motion controller with a MID-7602 stepper motor drive to position a 200 step/revolution stepper motor with an attached 1000 line encoder.  The MID-7602 is configured for 64 microsteps per step, giving 12,800 microsteps and 4000 encoder counts per revolution.  The system is controlled using LabView 7.1 and NI-Motion 6.13.  To home the motor, I've defined a sequence in MAX which first finds the reverse limit switch and then moves forward to the encoder index pulse.
    When finding its reference in open loop mode, the system its reference at the same microstep each time.  When findings its reference in closed loop mode, the system finds its reference somewhere within about a 20 microstep wide range.
    I hope somebody out there with more experience with this controller can describe the difference between finding the encoder index in open loop mode and finding the encoder index in closed loop mode. 
    Thanks,
    Mark Moss

    Hello Mark,
    I suspect that the behavior you are experiencing has today
    with the resolution difference between your encoder and your
    microstepping.  Let me illustrate with an
    example:
    Example Setup
    Stepper
    Motor
    NI
    Motion Controller
    10
    steps per encoder pulse (Every 10 steps the controller gets an encoder
    pulse, therefore positions 0-9 all appear to be 0 to the controller)
    The
    system has a maximum of 3 pull in moves set
    Open Loop Scenario
    The
    system is commanded to go to position 9.
    The
    controller sends out 9 pulses.
    The
    motor moves to position 9.
    Closed Loop Scenario
    The
    system is commanded to go to position 9.
    The
    controller sends out 9 pulses.
    The
    motor moves to position 9.
    The
    controller checks its position and sees that it is still at position 0
    because it has not received an encoder pulse.
    Because
    the controller thinks it is still at position 0, it sends another 9 pulses
    as its first pull in move.
    The
    motor moves to position 18.
    The
    controller checks its position and sees that it is at position 10 because
    it has only received one encoder pulse.
    Because
    the controller thinks it is still at position 10, it sends1 reverse pulse
    as its second pull in move.
    The
    motor moves to position 17.
    The
    controller checks its position and sees that it is at position 10 because
    it has only received one encoder pulse.
    Because
    the controller thinks it is still at position 10, it sends and additional
    single reverse pulse as its third pull in move.
    The
    motor moves to its final position of 16.
    I believe something similar is happening with your
    application as it looks for the index pulse. 
    Because the controller does not compensate for what it perceives as
    position error in open loop mode, the motor always goes to the same commanded
    position.  In closed loop mode, the motor
    is bouncing around inside the single index encoder pulse trying to find a
    certain position.
    There are several recommendations I can make towards
    correcting this behavior.  These
    recommendations are in order of effectiveness:
    Setup
    your system so that there are more encoder counts per revolution than
    steps per revolution.
    Turn
    off pull-in moves by setting them to 0 in MAX.
    Use an
    open loop configuration.
    Play
    around with the pull in window in MAX.
    Regards,
    Luke H

  • Difference between oracle 8i and oracle 10g

    Hi,
    i need to know the difference between oracle 8i and oracle 10g. Also, to know the depreciated and delimited features in oracle 10g, as compared to oracle 8i.
    Earlier response is appreciated.

    Differences between 9i and 10g are detailed here: http://download-uk.oracle.com/docs/cd/B19306_01/server.102/b14214/toc.htm
    Differences between 9i and 8i are detailed here:
    http://download-west.oracle.com/docs/cd/B10501_01/server.920/a96531/toc.htm

  • DIFFERENCES between BASIC SCHEDULING and LEAD-TIME SCHEDULING.

    Hello SAP Gurus,
    Kindly let me know the differences between BASIC SCHEDULING and LEAD-TIME SCHEDULING.
    Looking for your early feedback.
    Warm regards,
    Kaushik.

    Hi,
    Basic scheduling :
    1.Basic dates are calculated.
    2.Exact to day.
    3.No cap reqmts are generated.
    4.uses the inhouse production time from material master.
    5.carried out automatically during planning run.
    In basic date calculation ( order start date/ order finish date ) the system always
    calculates backward scheduling.
    1. From the reqmts date the system subtracts the GR processing time to
    calculate the order fininsh date.
    2. From the order finish date the system subtracts the inhouse production time to calculate the order start date.
    3. From the order start date the system subtracts the opening period given in scheduling margin key to calculate the order opening date.
    Lead time scheduling :
    1.Exact to second
    2.ie production start date /time and finish date and time are calculated.
    3. cap reqmts are generated.
    4. uses times from routing.
    5. carried out only if the scheduling mode in MD02 screen is kept with indicator 2.
    From the order finish date the system subtracts the float after production to calculate the production finish date.
    From the production finish date the individual operations in the routing are scheduled backwards to calculate production start date.
    From the production start date the system subtracts the float before production
    to calculate order start date.
    Regards,
    nandha

  • What is the difference between undo tablespace and online redo log files.

    what is the difference between undo tablespace and online redo log files. I am confused
    as per my knowledge undo tablespace is used to store the undo information when a table is being updated so that, just incase we need to rollback a transaction we know what was present in the table earlier.
    when a transaction fails the SMON performs the rollback of the data.
    This undo data is stored in the undo tablespace and read consistency if any is enforced.
    is my understanding till here correct?
    Now, can this undo data/before image not be stored in the redo log buffer and online redolog files?
    can redo-log files not store this information?
    in fact, is it that when undo tablespaces exist in a database, the undo data/before image is stored in both the undo tablespace and also the redo log files?
    kindly clarify my doubt.
    thank you.

    This question has been asked many times before. The answer is always the same.
    Yes, redo contains the before image of data (and the after-image). Therefore, it **COULD** be used to roll back a transaction.
    BUT... Redo is written sequentially. Using it to rollback your transaction would involve reading through all the redo written by maybe thousands of other people. It would be painfully slow.
    Your transaction is, however, directly linked to just the UNDO that it generates (which is JUST the before image of the data). So, your undo is your undo and doesn't share space with anyone else's undo. Therefore, using it to roll back YOUR transaction is fast.
    The fact that undo is only the before image of the data also makes it faster than wading through a sea of before and AFTER images as you'd find in redo. About twice as fast, in fact, since there's half the data. Roughly.
    Redo also gets written and flushed to disk whenever there's a commit, 3 seconds are up or too much (1MB, actually) redo gets generated between flushes caused by other factors. Your redo gets flushed when those things happen, even if you haven't actually committed your transaction. And redo logs recycle themselves, meaning that your redo -even if your transaction hasn't been committed yet- can be over-written by later transactions. Try rolling back when that's happened, if redo was the source of your rollback data!
    Undo, however, cannot be over-written if the transaction has not been committed. Ever. If you don't commit for three years, there will be three years' undo stored in your database (assuming you had the space, of course!).
    I could go on, but that will do. Redo is there fore RECOVERY, after catastrophe. Undo is there for read-consistency (and the occasional change of mind). Two different functions. Two different mechanisms. Each one highly tuned to doing what it does, why it does it, most efficiently and effectively.

  • Difference between .jar, .war and .ear file

    Hi,
    I am pretty new to J2EE technology.
    I would like to know what is the difference between .jar, .war and .ear files and how they are deployed on webserver.
    Thanks,

    Files with a .jar extension or JAR files, are essentially just a collection of files compressed using the ZIP/ZLIB compression format.
    JAR (short for Java Archive) files were introduced in the early days of Java as a means to conveniently package and distribute Java applications and components. Since then, a number of additions to the Java platform have followed suit. The introduction of the EAR file is one such addition.
    An EAR (Enterprise Archive) file is a JAR file that contains a J2EE application.
    A J2EE application is a group of Web modules that collectively perform as a single entity.
    A Web Module is an entity consisting of one or more resources such as HTML files, Java class files, XML files, etc. Web Modules are packaged in Web Archive (WAR) files.
    Looking at it from a top-down view, EAR files contain JAR files and WAR files. Packaging resources in WAR files, JAR files and eventually EAR files, makes it easy to reuse and reassemble components as new J2EE applications and distribute them to new environments.
    For example, Tomcat deals only with WAR files.
    So, in order to auto-deploy a Web application to a Tomcat environment, you must place an application's WAR file in the appropriate directory or use Tomcat's deployment tools to manually deploy the file.
    If you already have an EAR file that contains the WAR file, you can extract the WAR file and use it as is. If you do not have the EAR file or the WAR file, you can use any number of compliant tools to create the WAR file. Tomcat is a servlet/JSP container available from the jakarta.apache.org site.

  • Difference between 4.6c and 4.7e

    1. what is the difference between 4.6c and 4.7e?

    Hi,
      Commonalities:
    SAP 4.7 has all the features such as development workbench, transport management system, monitoring, versioning and business object repository of already existing SAP 4.6C.
    Web Application Server6.20 of 4.7 includes all the features of SAP Basis of SAP 4.6C.
    Differences:
    SAP 4.7 has a more structured approach as compared to SAP 4.6C from a technical perspective. It is based on mySAP.com technology, which is actually the Web Application Server 6.2C. This not only includes SAP Basis Technologies with their latest advancements but also the new features of SAP Web AS 6.20.
    SAP 4.7 is more structured even from a functional perspective as this version has been developed after functional and infrastructure developments of earlier SAP R/3 4.6C.
    In SAP 4.7 the functional and infrastructure developments are made on separate levels. The functional developments are made in the Enterprise Extensions and infrastructure developments are made in the Enterprise Core unlike SAP 4.6C in which both the developments take place within the systems.
    SAP in its Web AS has additional enhancements in the form of package concept, global parameterization with business configuration sets, Unicode compliance and accessibility that are not present in 4.6C.
    SAP 4.7 Core supports the above-mentioned enhancements that SAP 4.6C does not.
    SAP 4.7 unlike 4.6C has Enterprise Extensions that can be separately deployed and have their own releases.
    Commonalities:
    - SAP 4.7 has all the features such as development workbench, transport management system, monitoring, versioning and business object repository of already existing SAP 4.6C.
    - Web Application Server6.20 of 4.7 includes all the features of SAP Basis of SAP 4.6C.
    Differences:
    - SAP 4.7 has a more structured approach as compared to SAP 4.6C from a technical perspective. It is based on mySAP.com technology, which is actually the Web Application Server 6.2C. This not only includes SAP Basis Technologies with their latest advancements but also the new features of SAP Web AS 6.20.
    - SAP 4.7 is more structured even from a functional perspective as this version has been developed after functional and infrastructure developments of earlier SAP R/3 4.6C.
    - In SAP 4.7 the functional and infrastructure developments are made on separate levels. The functional developments are made in the Enterprise Extensions and infrastructure developments are made in the Enterprise Core unlike SAP 4.6C in which both the developments take place within the systems.
    - SAP in its Web AS has additional enhancements in the form of package concept, global parameterization with business configuration sets, Unicode compliance and accessibility that are not present in 4.6C.
    - SAP 4.7 Core supports the above-mentioned enhancements that SAP 4.6C does not.
    - SAP 4.7 unlike 4.6C has Enterprise Extensions that can be separately deployed and have their own releases.
    Hope this will help.
    Regards
    Kiran Sure

  • Difference between Scan Listener and Node listener

    Hi,
    I read the concept of SCAN in 11g R2 Grid Infrastructure. In that i come accross the below statements
    " 3 SCAN IP's and 3 SCAN Listeners will be up in the Cluster even if onlu ONE NODE IS UP with Clusterware active. This is BECAUSE SCAN listeners are not like NODE LISTENERS; they simply reroute connections so they do not need an instance to be available beneath them to make a database connections".
    Could some one please explan me the difference between Scan Listener and Node listener?
    Thanks in advance.
    Regards,
    Stephen

    The SCAN listener is the new feature in 11g. RAC in 9i and 10g had only node listeners. In earlier releases, the clients had to know each of the node listeners and define load balancing / failover between the node listener.
    Each node in the RAC cluster has a TNS Listener listening on the VIP.
    The SCAN is a single cluster-wide listener (although actually running as three separate processes, one on each node).. The client now needs to know only the SCAN listener. It does not need information of the node listeners to be maintained in the client-side tnsnames.ora file. SCAN allows for automatic load balancing as the client is directed to the nodes that are "up and able to take new connections" only. Also, as new nodes are added to the cluster, SCAN keeps track of them, the client tnsnames.ora does not need to be updated for new nodes.
    Hemant K Chitale

Maybe you are looking for